|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
430 5.92 0.08 1-Jenkins-Shallenberger vs 1-Gollehon-Reimers
450 4.75 1.25 3-Marshall-Cumbie vs 4-Jezierski-Gilbert
480 2.42 3.58 4-Roulier-Anderson vs 6-Lunne-Adler
480 2.42 3.58 6-Willard-Willard vs 3-Boesche-Boesche
480 2.42 3.58 7-Champion-Yingst vs 5-Riley-Riley
510 0.08 5.92 8-Gartner-Clydesdale vs 7-Goldston-Murphy
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
50 5.92 0.08 4-Roulier-Anderson vs 6-Lunne-Adler
170 4.75 1.25 6-Willard-Willard vs 3-Boesche-Boesche
430 3.58 2.42 1-Jenkins-Shallenberger vs 1-Gollehon-Reimers
460 1.83 4.17 3-Marshall-Cumbie vs 4-Jezierski-Gilbert
460 1.83 4.17 7-Champion-Yingst vs 5-Riley-Riley
490 0.08 5.92 8-Gartner-Clydesdale vs 7-Goldston-Murphy
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
50 5.33 0.67 1-Jenkins-Shallenberger vs 1-Gollehon-Reimers
50 5.33 0.67 4-Roulier-Anderson vs 6-Lunne-Adler
100 3.58 2.42 7-Champion-Yingst vs 5-Riley-Riley
110 2.42 3.58 6-Willard-Willard vs 3-Boesche-Boesche
200 1.25 4.75 8-Gartner-Clydesdale vs 7-Goldston-Murphy
600 0.08 5.92 3-Marshall-Cumbie vs 4-Jezierski-Gilbert
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
150 4.17 1.83 1-Jenkins-Shallenberger vs 1-Gollehon-Reimers
150 4.17 1.83 4-Roulier-Anderson vs 6-Lunne-Adler
150 4.17 1.83 6-Willard-Willard vs 3-Boesche-Boesche
150 4.17 1.83 7-Champion-Yingst vs 5-Riley-Riley
100 1.25 4.75 8-Gartner-Clydesdale vs 7-Goldston-Murphy
100 0.08 5.92 3-Marshall-Cumbie vs 4-Jezierski-Gilbert
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
50 3.58 2.42 2-Scott-Olson vs 2-Johnson-McGill
50 3.58 2.42 4-Roulier-Anderson vs 5-Riley-Riley
50 3.58 2.42 6-Willard-Willard vs 1-Gollehon-Reimers
50 3.58 2.42 7-Champion-Yingst vs 4-Jezierski-Gilbert
50 3.58 2.42 8-Gartner-Clydesdale vs 6-Lunne-Adler
430 0.08 5.92 5-Thomas-Sandoval vs 7-Goldston-Murphy
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
140 5.92 0.08 7-Champion-Yingst vs 4-Jezierski-Gilbert
100 4.75 1.25 5-Thomas-Sandoval vs 7-Goldston-Murphy
50 3.00 3.00 6-Willard-Willard vs 1-Gollehon-Reimers
50 3.00 3.00 8-Gartner-Clydesdale vs 6-Lunne-Adler
110 1.25 4.75 2-Scott-Olson vs 2-Johnson-McGill
300 0.08 5.92 4-Roulier-Anderson vs 5-Riley-Riley
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
120 5.92 0.08 7-Champion-Yingst vs 4-Jezierski-Gilbert
100 4.75 1.25 6-Willard-Willard vs 1-Gollehon-Reimers
130 3.58 2.42 8-Gartner-Clydesdale vs 6-Lunne-Adler
200 1.83 4.17 4-Roulier-Anderson vs 5-Riley-Riley
200 1.83 4.17 5-Thomas-Sandoval vs 7-Goldston-Murphy
910 0.08 5.92 2-Scott-Olson vs 2-Johnson-McGill
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
980 5.92 0.08 7-Champion-Yingst vs 4-Jezierski-Gilbert
480 3.00 3.00 2-Scott-Olson vs 2-Johnson-McGill
480 3.00 3.00 5-Thomas-Sandoval vs 7-Goldston-Murphy
480 3.00 3.00 6-Willard-Willard vs 1-Gollehon-Reimers
480 3.00 3.00 8-Gartner-Clydesdale vs 6-Lunne-Adler
450 0.08 5.92 4-Roulier-Anderson vs 5-Riley-Riley
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
100 5.33 0.67 5-Thomas-Sandoval vs 6-Lunne-Adler
100 5.33 0.67 7-Champion-Yingst vs 2-Johnson-McGill
90 3.58 2.42 2-Scott-Olson vs 1-Gollehon-Reimers
120 1.83 4.17 1-Jenkins-Shallenberger vs 7-Goldston-Murphy
120 1.83 4.17 8-Gartner-Clydesdale vs 5-Riley-Riley
150 0.08 5.92 3-Marshall-Cumbie vs 3-Boesche-Boesche
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
620 5.33 0.67 5-Thomas-Sandoval vs 6-Lunne-Adler
620 5.33 0.67 7-Champion-Yingst vs 2-Johnson-McGill
140 3.58 2.42 3-Marshall-Cumbie vs 3-Boesche-Boesche
100 1.25 4.75 1-Jenkins-Shallenberger vs 7-Goldston-Murphy
100 1.25 4.75 2-Scott-Olson vs 1-Gollehon-Reimers
100 1.25 4.75 8-Gartner-Clydesdale vs 5-Riley-Riley
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
200 5.92 0.08 5-Thomas-Sandoval vs 6-Lunne-Adler
170 4.75 1.25 2-Scott-Olson vs 1-Gollehon-Reimers
150 3.00 3.00 1-Jenkins-Shallenberger vs 7-Goldston-Murphy
150 3.00 3.00 7-Champion-Yingst vs 2-Johnson-McGill
140 1.25 4.75 8-Gartner-Clydesdale vs 5-Riley-Riley
110 0.08 5.92 3-Marshall-Cumbie vs 3-Boesche-Boesche
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
380 5.92 0.08 5-Thomas-Sandoval vs 6-Lunne-Adler
100 3.58 2.42 2-Scott-Olson vs 1-Gollehon-Reimers
100 3.58 2.42 3-Marshall-Cumbie vs 3-Boesche-Boesche
100 3.58 2.42 8-Gartner-Clydesdale vs 5-Riley-Riley
120 1.25 4.75 7-Champion-Yingst vs 2-Johnson-McGill
200 0.08 5.92 1-Jenkins-Shallenberger vs 7-Goldston-Murphy
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
100 5.92 0.08 8-Gartner-Clydesdale vs 3-Boesche-Boesche
90 4.75 1.25 7-Champion-Yingst vs 1-Gollehon-Reimers
120 2.42 3.58 1-Jenkins-Shallenberger vs 6-Lunne-Adler
120 2.42 3.58 3-Marshall-Cumbie vs 2-Johnson-McGill
120 2.42 3.58 4-Roulier-Anderson vs 4-Jezierski-Gilbert
150 0.08 5.92 6-Willard-Willard vs 7-Goldston-Murphy
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
230 5.92 0.08 8-Gartner-Clydesdale vs 3-Boesche-Boesche
450 4.17 1.83 1-Jenkins-Shallenberger vs 6-Lunne-Adler
450 4.17 1.83 3-Marshall-Cumbie vs 2-Johnson-McGill
480 1.25 4.75 4-Roulier-Anderson vs 4-Jezierski-Gilbert
480 1.25 4.75 6-Willard-Willard vs 7-Goldston-Murphy
480 1.25 4.75 7-Champion-Yingst vs 1-Gollehon-Reimers
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
50 5.92 0.08 7-Champion-Yingst vs 1-Gollehon-Reimers
140 4.75 1.25 1-Jenkins-Shallenberger vs 6-Lunne-Adler
170 3.00 3.00 3-Marshall-Cumbie vs 2-Johnson-McGill
170 3.00 3.00 6-Willard-Willard vs 7-Goldston-Murphy
420 1.25 4.75 8-Gartner-Clydesdale vs 3-Boesche-Boesche
450 0.08 5.92 4-Roulier-Anderson vs 4-Jezierski-Gilbert
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
150 5.92 0.08 1-Jenkins-Shallenberger vs 6-Lunne-Adler
100 4.17 1.83 4-Roulier-Anderson vs 4-Jezierski-Gilbert
100 4.17 1.83 6-Willard-Willard vs 7-Goldston-Murphy
80 2.42 3.58 7-Champion-Yingst vs 1-Gollehon-Reimers
50 1.25 4.75 3-Marshall-Cumbie vs 2-Johnson-McGill
150 0.08 5.92 8-Gartner-Clydesdale vs 3-Boesche-Boesche
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
100 5.92 0.08 5-Thomas-Sandoval vs 5-Riley-Riley
50 4.17 1.83 1-Jenkins-Shallenberger vs 4-Jezierski-Gilbert
50 4.17 1.83 2-Scott-Olson vs 7-Goldston-Murphy
110 1.83 4.17 4-Roulier-Anderson vs 3-Boesche-Boesche
110 1.83 4.17 8-Gartner-Clydesdale vs 2-Johnson-McGill
150 0.08 5.92 3-Marshall-Cumbie vs 1-Gollehon-Reimers
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
400 5.92 0.08 4-Roulier-Anderson vs 3-Boesche-Boesche
420 4.17 1.83 5-Thomas-Sandoval vs 5-Riley-Riley
420 4.17 1.83 8-Gartner-Clydesdale vs 2-Johnson-McGill
460 1.25 4.75 1-Jenkins-Shallenberger vs 4-Jezierski-Gilbert
460 1.25 4.75 2-Scott-Olson vs 7-Goldston-Murphy
460 1.25 4.75 3-Marshall-Cumbie vs 1-Gollehon-Reimers
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
100 5.33 0.67 2-Scott-Olson vs 7-Goldston-Murphy
100 5.33 0.67 8-Gartner-Clydesdale vs 2-Johnson-McGill
140 3.58 2.42 3-Marshall-Cumbie vs 1-Gollehon-Reimers
620 1.25 4.75 1-Jenkins-Shallenberger vs 4-Jezierski-Gilbert
620 1.25 4.75 4-Roulier-Anderson vs 3-Boesche-Boesche
620 1.25 4.75 5-Thomas-Sandoval vs 5-Riley-Riley
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
170 5.92 0.08 3-Marshall-Cumbie vs 1-Gollehon-Reimers
620 4.17 1.83 4-Roulier-Anderson vs 3-Boesche-Boesche
620 4.17 1.83 5-Thomas-Sandoval vs 5-Riley-Riley
650 1.83 4.17 1-Jenkins-Shallenberger vs 4-Jezierski-Gilbert
650 1.83 4.17 2-Scott-Olson vs 7-Goldston-Murphy
790 0.08 5.92 8-Gartner-Clydesdale vs 2-Johnson-McGill
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
50 5.92 0.08 6-Willard-Willard vs 6-Lunne-Adler
150 3.58 2.42 2-Scott-Olson vs 5-Riley-Riley
150 3.58 2.42 5-Thomas-Sandoval vs 4-Jezierski-Gilbert
150 3.58 2.42 8-Gartner-Clydesdale vs 1-Gollehon-Reimers
170 1.25 4.75 4-Roulier-Anderson vs 2-Johnson-McGill
400 0.08 5.92 1-Jenkins-Shallenberger vs 3-Boesche-Boesche
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
400 5.92 0.08 2-Scott-Olson vs 5-Riley-Riley
200 4.75 1.25 1-Jenkins-Shallenberger vs 3-Boesche-Boesche
130 3.58 2.42 4-Roulier-Anderson vs 2-Johnson-McGill
120 2.42 3.58 8-Gartner-Clydesdale vs 1-Gollehon-Reimers
110 0.67 5.33 5-Thomas-Sandoval vs 4-Jezierski-Gilbert
110 0.67 5.33 6-Willard-Willard vs 6-Lunne-Adler
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
650 4.17 1.83 1-Jenkins-Shallenberger vs 3-Boesche-Boesche
650 4.17 1.83 2-Scott-Olson vs 5-Riley-Riley
650 4.17 1.83 4-Roulier-Anderson vs 2-Johnson-McGill
650 4.17 1.83 5-Thomas-Sandoval vs 4-Jezierski-Gilbert
200 1.25 4.75 8-Gartner-Clydesdale vs 1-Gollehon-Reimers
170 0.08 5.92 6-Willard-Willard vs 6-Lunne-Adler
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
300 5.92 0.08 1-Jenkins-Shallenberger vs 3-Boesche-Boesche
490 4.75 1.25 2-Scott-Olson vs 5-Riley-Riley
990 3.58 2.42 4-Roulier-Anderson vs 2-Johnson-McGill
1020 1.25 4.75 5-Thomas-Sandoval vs 4-Jezierski-Gilbert
1020 1.25 4.75 6-Willard-Willard vs 6-Lunne-Adler
1020 1.25 4.75 8-Gartner-Clydesdale vs 1-Gollehon-Reimers
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
100 6.00 0.00 4-Roulier-Anderson vs 1-Gollehon-Reimers
140 5.00 1.00 6-Willard-Willard vs 5-Riley-Riley
600 4.00 2.00 1-Jenkins-Shallenberger vs 2-Johnson-McGill
620 2.50 3.50 2-Scott-Olson vs 4-Jezierski-Gilbert
620 2.50 3.50 7-Champion-Yingst vs 7-Goldston-Murphy
630 0.50 5.50 3-Marshall-Cumbie vs 6-Lunne-Adler
630 0.50 5.50 5-Thomas-Sandoval vs 3-Boesche-Boesche
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
690 6.00 0.00 2-Scott-Olson vs 4-Jezierski-Gilbert
660 3.50 2.50 1-Jenkins-Shallenberger vs 2-Johnson-McGill
660 3.50 2.50 4-Roulier-Anderson vs 1-Gollehon-Reimers
660 3.50 2.50 6-Willard-Willard vs 5-Riley-Riley
660 3.50 2.50 7-Champion-Yingst vs 7-Goldston-Murphy
630 1.00 5.00 5-Thomas-Sandoval vs 3-Boesche-Boesche
100 0.00 6.00 3-Marshall-Cumbie vs 6-Lunne-Adler
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
460 4.00 2.00 2-Scott-Olson vs 4-Jezierski-Gilbert
460 4.00 2.00 4-Roulier-Anderson vs 1-Gollehon-Reimers
460 4.00 2.00 5-Thomas-Sandoval vs 3-Boesche-Boesche
460 4.00 2.00 6-Willard-Willard vs 5-Riley-Riley
460 4.00 2.00 7-Champion-Yingst vs 7-Goldston-Murphy
430 1.00 5.00 1-Jenkins-Shallenberger vs 2-Johnson-McGill
170 0.00 6.00 3-Marshall-Cumbie vs 6-Lunne-Adler
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
620 6.00 0.00 2-Scott-Olson vs 4-Jezierski-Gilbert
100 5.00 1.00 1-Jenkins-Shallenberger vs 2-Johnson-McGill
100 3.50 2.50 3-Marshall-Cumbie vs 6-Lunne-Adler
100 3.50 2.50 4-Roulier-Anderson vs 1-Gollehon-Reimers
300 2.00 4.00 6-Willard-Willard vs 5-Riley-Riley
500 1.00 5.00 5-Thomas-Sandoval vs 3-Boesche-Boesche
800 0.00 6.00 7-Champion-Yingst vs 7-Goldston-Murphy
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
950 5.92 0.08 4-Roulier-Anderson vs 7-Goldston-Murphy
660 4.75 1.25 7-Champion-Yingst vs 6-Lunne-Adler
300 3.58 2.42 3-Marshall-Cumbie vs 5-Riley-Riley
100 2.42 3.58 5-Thomas-Sandoval vs 2-Johnson-McGill
300 0.67 5.33 2-Scott-Olson vs 3-Boesche-Boesche
300 0.67 5.33 6-Willard-Willard vs 4-Jezierski-Gilbert
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
420 5.92 0.08 5-Thomas-Sandoval vs 2-Johnson-McGill
430 4.75 1.25 2-Scott-Olson vs 3-Boesche-Boesche
450 2.42 3.58 3-Marshall-Cumbie vs 5-Riley-Riley
450 2.42 3.58 4-Roulier-Anderson vs 7-Goldston-Murphy
450 2.42 3.58 7-Champion-Yingst vs 6-Lunne-Adler
980 0.08 5.92 6-Willard-Willard vs 4-Jezierski-Gilbert
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
620 5.33 0.67 2-Scott-Olson vs 3-Boesche-Boesche
620 5.33 0.67 5-Thomas-Sandoval vs 2-Johnson-McGill
170 3.58 2.42 4-Roulier-Anderson vs 7-Goldston-Murphy
140 1.83 4.17 3-Marshall-Cumbie vs 5-Riley-Riley
140 1.83 4.17 6-Willard-Willard vs 4-Jezierski-Gilbert
100 0.08 5.92 7-Champion-Yingst vs 6-Lunne-Adler
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
420 5.33 0.67 2-Scott-Olson vs 3-Boesche-Boesche
420 5.33 0.67 4-Roulier-Anderson vs 7-Goldston-Murphy
170 3.58 2.42 7-Champion-Yingst vs 6-Lunne-Adler
140 1.83 4.17 5-Thomas-Sandoval vs 2-Johnson-McGill
140 1.83 4.17 6-Willard-Willard vs 4-Jezierski-Gilbert
50 0.08 5.92 3-Marshall-Cumbie vs 5-Riley-Riley
|