|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
50 3.50 0.50 4-Blazek-Patrick vs 1-Gollehon-Reimers
50 3.50 0.50 9-Jacobson-Carnell vs 2-Hyden-Hague
100 2.00 2.00 7-Thomas-Sandoval vs 3-Cumbie-Nabors
110 1.00 3.00 6-Howell-Montgomery vs 5-Shallenberger-Dietrich
140 0.00 4.00 10-Scott-Turk vs 8-Yingst-Champion
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
130 4.00 0.00 9-Jacobson-Carnell vs 2-Hyden-Hague
150 3.00 1.00 7-Thomas-Sandoval vs 3-Cumbie-Nabors
400 2.00 2.00 4-Blazek-Patrick vs 1-Gollehon-Reimers
430 1.00 3.00 10-Scott-Turk vs 8-Yingst-Champion
460 0.00 4.00 6-Howell-Montgomery vs 5-Shallenberger-Dietrich
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
100 4.00 0.00 7-Thomas-Sandoval vs 3-Cumbie-Nabors
100 3.00 1.00 9-Jacobson-Carnell vs 2-Hyden-Hague
140 2.00 2.00 4-Blazek-Patrick vs 1-Gollehon-Reimers
620 0.50 3.50 6-Howell-Montgomery vs 5-Shallenberger-Dietrich
620 0.50 3.50 10-Scott-Turk vs 8-Yingst-Champion
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
110 4.00 0.00 8-Yingst-Champion vs 4-Blazek-Patrick
140 3.00 1.00 1-Gollehon-Reimers vs 3-Cumbie-Nabors
170 2.00 2.00 5-Shallenberger-Dietrich vs 2-Hyden-Hague
200 0.50 3.50 7-Thomas-Sandoval vs 6-Howell-Montgomery
200 0.50 3.50 10-Scott-Turk vs 9-Jacobson-Carnell
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
110 4.00 0.00 5-Shallenberger-Dietrich vs 2-Hyden-Hague
100 1.50 2.50 1-Gollehon-Reimers vs 3-Cumbie-Nabors
100 1.50 2.50 7-Thomas-Sandoval vs 6-Howell-Montgomery
100 1.50 2.50 8-Yingst-Champion vs 4-Blazek-Patrick
100 1.50 2.50 10-Scott-Turk vs 9-Jacobson-Carnell
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
300 4.00 0.00 10-Scott-Turk vs 9-Jacobson-Carnell
200 3.00 1.00 1-Gollehon-Reimers vs 3-Cumbie-Nabors
100 2.00 2.00 5-Shallenberger-Dietrich vs 2-Hyden-Hague
110 1.00 3.00 8-Yingst-Champion vs 4-Blazek-Patrick
140 0.00 4.00 7-Thomas-Sandoval vs 6-Howell-Montgomery
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
660 3.50 0.50 9-Jacobson-Carnell vs 5-Shallenberger-Dietrich
660 3.50 0.50 10-Scott-Turk vs 1-Gollehon-Reimers
630 2.00 2.00 6-Howell-Montgomery vs 3-Cumbie-Nabors
200 0.50 3.50 2-Hyden-Hague vs 4-Blazek-Patrick
200 0.50 3.50 8-Yingst-Champion vs 7-Thomas-Sandoval
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
400 4.00 0.00 2-Hyden-Hague vs 4-Blazek-Patrick
120 3.00 1.00 6-Howell-Montgomery vs 3-Cumbie-Nabors
50 2.00 2.00 9-Jacobson-Carnell vs 5-Shallenberger-Dietrich
50 0.50 3.50 8-Yingst-Champion vs 7-Thomas-Sandoval
50 0.50 3.50 10-Scott-Turk vs 1-Gollehon-Reimers
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
140 4.00 0.00 9-Jacobson-Carnell vs 5-Shallenberger-Dietrich
100 3.00 1.00 10-Scott-Turk vs 1-Gollehon-Reimers
140 2.00 2.00 6-Howell-Montgomery vs 3-Cumbie-Nabors
150 0.50 3.50 2-Hyden-Hague vs 4-Blazek-Patrick
150 0.50 3.50 8-Yingst-Champion vs 7-Thomas-Sandoval
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
100 4.00 0.00 3-Cumbie-Nabors vs 5-Shallenberger-Dietrich
PASS 3.00 1.00 1-Gollehon-Reimers vs 6-Howell-Montgomery
100 2.00 2.00 10-Scott-Turk vs 2-Hyden-Hague
140 1.00 3.00 7-Thomas-Sandoval vs 4-Blazek-Patrick
620 0.00 4.00 9-Jacobson-Carnell vs 8-Yingst-Champion
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
420 3.50 0.50 1-Gollehon-Reimers vs 6-Howell-Montgomery
420 3.50 0.50 10-Scott-Turk vs 2-Hyden-Hague
400 1.00 3.00 3-Cumbie-Nabors vs 5-Shallenberger-Dietrich
400 1.00 3.00 7-Thomas-Sandoval vs 4-Blazek-Patrick
400 1.00 3.00 9-Jacobson-Carnell vs 8-Yingst-Champion
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
200 4.00 0.00 7-Thomas-Sandoval vs 4-Blazek-Patrick
50 2.50 1.50 1-Gollehon-Reimers vs 6-Howell-Montgomery
50 2.50 1.50 10-Scott-Turk vs 2-Hyden-Hague
120 0.50 3.50 3-Cumbie-Nabors vs 5-Shallenberger-Dietrich
120 0.50 3.50 9-Jacobson-Carnell vs 8-Yingst-Champion
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
200 4.00 0.00 4-Blazek-Patrick vs 6-Howell-Montgomery
110 3.00 1.00 8-Yingst-Champion vs 5-Shallenberger-Dietrich
200 1.00 3.00 1-Gollehon-Reimers vs 9-Jacobson-Carnell
200 1.00 3.00 2-Hyden-Hague vs 7-Thomas-Sandoval
200 1.00 3.00 10-Scott-Turk vs 3-Cumbie-Nabors
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
460 4.00 0.00 8-Yingst-Champion vs 5-Shallenberger-Dietrich
400 2.50 1.50 2-Hyden-Hague vs 7-Thomas-Sandoval
400 2.50 1.50 10-Scott-Turk vs 3-Cumbie-Nabors
50 1.00 3.00 1-Gollehon-Reimers vs 9-Jacobson-Carnell
100 0.00 4.00 4-Blazek-Patrick vs 6-Howell-Montgomery
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
150 3.00 1.00 1-Gollehon-Reimers vs 9-Jacobson-Carnell
150 3.00 1.00 2-Hyden-Hague vs 7-Thomas-Sandoval
150 3.00 1.00 4-Blazek-Patrick vs 6-Howell-Montgomery
110 1.00 3.00 10-Scott-Turk vs 3-Cumbie-Nabors
100 0.00 4.00 8-Yingst-Champion vs 5-Shallenberger-Dietrich
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
110 3.50 0.50 5-Shallenberger-Dietrich vs 7-Thomas-Sandoval
110 3.50 0.50 10-Scott-Turk vs 4-Blazek-Patrick
50 1.50 2.50 2-Hyden-Hague vs 1-Gollehon-Reimers
50 1.50 2.50 3-Cumbie-Nabors vs 8-Yingst-Champion
100 0.00 4.00 9-Jacobson-Carnell vs 6-Howell-Montgomery
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
90 4.00 0.00 10-Scott-Turk vs 4-Blazek-Patrick
50 3.00 1.00 3-Cumbie-Nabors vs 8-Yingst-Champion
110 1.00 3.00 2-Hyden-Hague vs 1-Gollehon-Reimers
110 1.00 3.00 5-Shallenberger-Dietrich vs 7-Thomas-Sandoval
110 1.00 3.00 9-Jacobson-Carnell vs 6-Howell-Montgomery
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
600 3.50 0.50 2-Hyden-Hague vs 1-Gollehon-Reimers
600 3.50 0.50 5-Shallenberger-Dietrich vs 7-Thomas-Sandoval
300 2.00 2.00 3-Cumbie-Nabors vs 8-Yingst-Champion
100 1.00 3.00 10-Scott-Turk vs 4-Blazek-Patrick
50 0.00 4.00 9-Jacobson-Carnell vs 6-Howell-Montgomery
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
480 3.50 0.50 1-Gollehon-Reimers vs 7-Thomas-Sandoval
480 3.50 0.50 10-Scott-Turk vs 5-Shallenberger-Dietrich
450 2.00 2.00 4-Blazek-Patrick vs 9-Jacobson-Carnell
420 1.00 3.00 3-Cumbie-Nabors vs 2-Hyden-Hague
100 0.00 4.00 6-Howell-Montgomery vs 8-Yingst-Champion
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
620 4.00 0.00 10-Scott-Turk vs 5-Shallenberger-Dietrich
170 3.00 1.00 3-Cumbie-Nabors vs 2-Hyden-Hague
140 1.50 2.50 4-Blazek-Patrick vs 9-Jacobson-Carnell
140 1.50 2.50 6-Howell-Montgomery vs 8-Yingst-Champion
100 0.00 4.00 1-Gollehon-Reimers vs 7-Thomas-Sandoval
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
50 4.00 0.00 1-Gollehon-Reimers vs 7-Thomas-Sandoval
150 3.00 1.00 4-Blazek-Patrick vs 9-Jacobson-Carnell
170 2.00 2.00 10-Scott-Turk vs 5-Shallenberger-Dietrich
400 1.00 3.00 3-Cumbie-Nabors vs 2-Hyden-Hague
420 0.00 4.00 6-Howell-Montgomery vs 8-Yingst-Champion
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
200 4.00 0.00 5-Shallenberger-Dietrich vs 1-Gollehon-Reimers
100 3.00 1.00 2-Hyden-Hague vs 8-Yingst-Champion
120 2.00 2.00 7-Thomas-Sandoval vs 9-Jacobson-Carnell
140 0.50 3.50 4-Blazek-Patrick vs 3-Cumbie-Nabors
140 0.50 3.50 10-Scott-Turk vs 6-Howell-Montgomery
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
300 4.00 0.00 7-Thomas-Sandoval vs 9-Jacobson-Carnell
90 2.50 1.50 2-Hyden-Hague vs 8-Yingst-Champion
90 2.50 1.50 5-Shallenberger-Dietrich vs 1-Gollehon-Reimers
120 1.00 3.00 4-Blazek-Patrick vs 3-Cumbie-Nabors
200 0.00 4.00 10-Scott-Turk vs 6-Howell-Montgomery
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
110 3.00 1.00 2-Hyden-Hague vs 8-Yingst-Champion
110 3.00 1.00 5-Shallenberger-Dietrich vs 1-Gollehon-Reimers
110 3.00 1.00 10-Scott-Turk vs 6-Howell-Montgomery
50 1.00 3.00 7-Thomas-Sandoval vs 9-Jacobson-Carnell
50 0.00 4.00 4-Blazek-Patrick vs 3-Cumbie-Nabors
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
200 4.00 0.00 8-Yingst-Champion vs 1-Gollehon-Reimers
150 3.00 1.00 10-Scott-Turk vs 7-Thomas-Sandoval
630 2.00 2.00 6-Howell-Montgomery vs 2-Hyden-Hague
690 0.50 3.50 3-Cumbie-Nabors vs 9-Jacobson-Carnell
690 0.50 3.50 5-Shallenberger-Dietrich vs 4-Blazek-Patrick
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
680 3.50 0.50 5-Shallenberger-Dietrich vs 4-Blazek-Patrick
680 3.50 0.50 6-Howell-Montgomery vs 2-Hyden-Hague
1370 2.00 2.00 10-Scott-Turk vs 7-Thomas-Sandoval
1430 0.50 3.50 3-Cumbie-Nabors vs 9-Jacobson-Carnell
1430 0.50 3.50 8-Yingst-Champion vs 1-Gollehon-Reimers
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
100 4.00 0.00 5-Shallenberger-Dietrich vs 4-Blazek-Patrick
50 3.00 1.00 10-Scott-Turk vs 7-Thomas-Sandoval
140 2.00 2.00 3-Cumbie-Nabors vs 9-Jacobson-Carnell
400 1.00 3.00 8-Yingst-Champion vs 1-Gollehon-Reimers
430 0.00 4.00 6-Howell-Montgomery vs 2-Hyden-Hague
|