|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
460 1.00 0.00 4-Patrick-Blazek vs 2-Reimers-Gollehon
50 0.00 1.00 6-Lumpkins-Rychlik vs 1-Michael-Parker
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
50 1.00 0.00 4-Patrick-Blazek vs 2-Reimers-Gollehon
490 0.00 1.00 6-Lumpkins-Rychlik vs 1-Michael-Parker
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
420 1.00 0.00 6-Lumpkins-Rychlik vs 1-Michael-Parker
50 0.00 1.00 4-Patrick-Blazek vs 2-Reimers-Gollehon
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
620 1.00 0.00 4-Patrick-Blazek vs 2-Reimers-Gollehon
200 0.00 1.00 6-Lumpkins-Rychlik vs 1-Michael-Parker
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
90 1.00 0.00 4-Patrick-Blazek vs 2-Reimers-Gollehon
200 0.00 1.00 6-Lumpkins-Rychlik vs 1-Michael-Parker
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
510 1.00 0.00 6-Lumpkins-Rychlik vs 2-Reimers-Gollehon
200 0.00 1.00 1-Michael-Parker vs 5-Bredall-Hegarty
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
650 1.00 0.00 6-Lumpkins-Rychlik vs 2-Reimers-Gollehon
100 0.00 1.00 1-Michael-Parker vs 5-Bredall-Hegarty
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
130 1.00 0.00 6-Lumpkins-Rychlik vs 2-Reimers-Gollehon
110 0.00 1.00 1-Michael-Parker vs 5-Bredall-Hegarty
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
100 1.00 0.00 1-Michael-Parker vs 5-Bredall-Hegarty
680 0.00 1.00 6-Lumpkins-Rychlik vs 2-Reimers-Gollehon
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
130 1.00 0.00 6-Lumpkins-Rychlik vs 2-Reimers-Gollehon
100 0.00 1.00 1-Michael-Parker vs 5-Bredall-Hegarty
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
140 0.50 0.50 2-Reimers-Gollehon vs 1-Michael-Parker
140 0.50 0.50 5-Bredall-Hegarty vs 4-Patrick-Blazek
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
170 1.00 0.00 5-Bredall-Hegarty vs 4-Patrick-Blazek
140 0.00 1.00 2-Reimers-Gollehon vs 1-Michael-Parker
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
170 1.00 0.00 2-Reimers-Gollehon vs 1-Michael-Parker
620 0.00 1.00 5-Bredall-Hegarty vs 4-Patrick-Blazek
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
490 1.00 0.00 5-Bredall-Hegarty vs 4-Patrick-Blazek
520 0.00 1.00 2-Reimers-Gollehon vs 1-Michael-Parker
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
50 1.00 0.00 2-Reimers-Gollehon vs 1-Michael-Parker
140 0.00 1.00 5-Bredall-Hegarty vs 4-Patrick-Blazek
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
450 0.50 0.50 2-Reimers-Gollehon vs 5-Bredall-Hegarty
450 0.50 0.50 6-Lumpkins-Rychlik vs 4-Patrick-Blazek
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
420 0.50 0.50 2-Reimers-Gollehon vs 5-Bredall-Hegarty
420 0.50 0.50 6-Lumpkins-Rychlik vs 4-Patrick-Blazek
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
620 1.00 0.00 2-Reimers-Gollehon vs 5-Bredall-Hegarty
200 0.00 1.00 6-Lumpkins-Rychlik vs 4-Patrick-Blazek
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
650 0.50 0.50 2-Reimers-Gollehon vs 5-Bredall-Hegarty
650 0.50 0.50 6-Lumpkins-Rychlik vs 4-Patrick-Blazek
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
100 1.00 0.00 2-Reimers-Gollehon vs 5-Bredall-Hegarty
120 0.00 1.00 6-Lumpkins-Rychlik vs 4-Patrick-Blazek
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
140 1.00 0.00 1-Michael-Parker vs 4-Patrick-Blazek
100 0.00 1.00 6-Lumpkins-Rychlik vs 5-Bredall-Hegarty
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
170 1.00 0.00 1-Michael-Parker vs 4-Patrick-Blazek
140 0.00 1.00 6-Lumpkins-Rychlik vs 5-Bredall-Hegarty
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
150 0.50 0.50 1-Michael-Parker vs 4-Patrick-Blazek
150 0.50 0.50 6-Lumpkins-Rychlik vs 5-Bredall-Hegarty
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
130 0.50 0.50 1-Michael-Parker vs 4-Patrick-Blazek
130 0.50 0.50 6-Lumpkins-Rychlik vs 5-Bredall-Hegarty
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
110 1.00 0.00 1-Michael-Parker vs 4-Patrick-Blazek
140 0.00 1.00 6-Lumpkins-Rychlik vs 5-Bredall-Hegarty
|