|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
100 4.00 0.00 10-Themis-Wilkie vs 8-Fineberg-Fidelman
50 2.50 1.50 4-Huckabay-Hall vs 1-Mikkelsen-Ambrosio
50 2.50 1.50 7-Ramakrishnan-Ramakrishnan vs 3-Johnson-Gagnon
90 1.00 3.00 6-Babbe-Sager vs 5-Kavall-Giberson
100 0.00 4.00 9-Vasilevsky-Vasilevsky vs 2-Lafleur-Wishnev
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
480 2.00 2.00 4-Huckabay-Hall vs 1-Mikkelsen-Ambrosio
480 2.00 2.00 6-Babbe-Sager vs 5-Kavall-Giberson
480 2.00 2.00 7-Ramakrishnan-Ramakrishnan vs 3-Johnson-Gagnon
480 2.00 2.00 9-Vasilevsky-Vasilevsky vs 2-Lafleur-Wishnev
480 2.00 2.00 10-Themis-Wilkie vs 8-Fineberg-Fidelman
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
200 4.00 0.00 10-Themis-Wilkie vs 8-Fineberg-Fidelman
100 3.00 1.00 9-Vasilevsky-Vasilevsky vs 2-Lafleur-Wishnev
140 2.00 2.00 4-Huckabay-Hall vs 1-Mikkelsen-Ambrosio
600 1.00 3.00 7-Ramakrishnan-Ramakrishnan vs 3-Johnson-Gagnon
630 0.00 4.00 6-Babbe-Sager vs 5-Kavall-Giberson
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
600 4.00 0.00 8-Fineberg-Fidelman vs 4-Huckabay-Hall
150 3.00 1.00 7-Ramakrishnan-Ramakrishnan vs 6-Babbe-Sager
110 2.00 2.00 1-Mikkelsen-Ambrosio vs 3-Johnson-Gagnon
100 1.00 3.00 5-Kavall-Giberson vs 2-Lafleur-Wishnev
200 0.00 4.00 10-Themis-Wilkie vs 9-Vasilevsky-Vasilevsky
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
600 4.00 0.00 7-Ramakrishnan-Ramakrishnan vs 6-Babbe-Sager
180 3.00 1.00 5-Kavall-Giberson vs 2-Lafleur-Wishnev
150 2.00 2.00 8-Fineberg-Fidelman vs 4-Huckabay-Hall
110 1.00 3.00 10-Themis-Wilkie vs 9-Vasilevsky-Vasilevsky
PASS 0.00 4.00 1-Mikkelsen-Ambrosio vs 3-Johnson-Gagnon
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
650 4.00 0.00 8-Fineberg-Fidelman vs 4-Huckabay-Hall
480 3.00 1.00 5-Kavall-Giberson vs 2-Lafleur-Wishnev
450 2.00 2.00 7-Ramakrishnan-Ramakrishnan vs 6-Babbe-Sager
170 1.00 3.00 10-Themis-Wilkie vs 9-Vasilevsky-Vasilevsky
50 0.00 4.00 1-Mikkelsen-Ambrosio vs 3-Johnson-Gagnon
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
140 4.00 0.00 10-Themis-Wilkie vs 1-Mikkelsen-Ambrosio
110 3.00 1.00 9-Vasilevsky-Vasilevsky vs 5-Kavall-Giberson
150 1.50 2.50 2-Lafleur-Wishnev vs 4-Huckabay-Hall
150 1.50 2.50 6-Babbe-Sager vs 3-Johnson-Gagnon
600 0.00 4.00 8-Fineberg-Fidelman vs 7-Ramakrishnan-Ramakrishnan
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
50 3.50 0.50 2-Lafleur-Wishnev vs 4-Huckabay-Hall
50 3.50 0.50 8-Fineberg-Fidelman vs 7-Ramakrishnan-Ramakrishnan
430 2.00 2.00 6-Babbe-Sager vs 3-Johnson-Gagnon
460 1.00 3.00 10-Themis-Wilkie vs 1-Mikkelsen-Ambrosio
650 0.00 4.00 9-Vasilevsky-Vasilevsky vs 5-Kavall-Giberson
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
200 4.00 0.00 9-Vasilevsky-Vasilevsky vs 5-Kavall-Giberson
100 2.00 2.00 6-Babbe-Sager vs 3-Johnson-Gagnon
100 2.00 2.00 8-Fineberg-Fidelman vs 7-Ramakrishnan-Ramakrishnan
100 2.00 2.00 10-Themis-Wilkie vs 1-Mikkelsen-Ambrosio
170 0.00 4.00 2-Lafleur-Wishnev vs 4-Huckabay-Hall
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
140 4.00 0.00 1-Mikkelsen-Ambrosio vs 6-Babbe-Sager
620 3.00 1.00 3-Johnson-Gagnon vs 5-Kavall-Giberson
650 1.50 2.50 9-Vasilevsky-Vasilevsky vs 8-Fineberg-Fidelman
650 1.50 2.50 10-Themis-Wilkie vs 2-Lafleur-Wishnev
690 0.00 4.00 7-Ramakrishnan-Ramakrishnan vs 4-Huckabay-Hall
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
120 4.00 0.00 1-Mikkelsen-Ambrosio vs 6-Babbe-Sager
100 2.50 1.50 3-Johnson-Gagnon vs 5-Kavall-Giberson
100 2.50 1.50 7-Ramakrishnan-Ramakrishnan vs 4-Huckabay-Hall
50 1.00 3.00 10-Themis-Wilkie vs 2-Lafleur-Wishnev
110 0.00 4.00 9-Vasilevsky-Vasilevsky vs 8-Fineberg-Fidelman
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
750 4.00 0.00 9-Vasilevsky-Vasilevsky vs 8-Fineberg-Fidelman
600 3.00 1.00 10-Themis-Wilkie vs 2-Lafleur-Wishnev
200 2.00 2.00 7-Ramakrishnan-Ramakrishnan vs 4-Huckabay-Hall
100 1.00 3.00 3-Johnson-Gagnon vs 5-Kavall-Giberson
170 0.00 4.00 1-Mikkelsen-Ambrosio vs 6-Babbe-Sager
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
600 3.00 1.00 4-Huckabay-Hall vs 6-Babbe-Sager
600 3.00 1.00 8-Fineberg-Fidelman vs 5-Kavall-Giberson
600 3.00 1.00 10-Themis-Wilkie vs 3-Johnson-Gagnon
500 1.00 3.00 2-Lafleur-Wishnev vs 7-Ramakrishnan-Ramakrishnan
200 0.00 4.00 1-Mikkelsen-Ambrosio vs 9-Vasilevsky-Vasilevsky
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
200 3.50 0.50 8-Fineberg-Fidelman vs 5-Kavall-Giberson
200 3.50 0.50 10-Themis-Wilkie vs 3-Johnson-Gagnon
150 2.00 2.00 2-Lafleur-Wishnev vs 7-Ramakrishnan-Ramakrishnan
50 0.50 3.50 1-Mikkelsen-Ambrosio vs 9-Vasilevsky-Vasilevsky
50 0.50 3.50 4-Huckabay-Hall vs 6-Babbe-Sager
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
100 3.50 0.50 2-Lafleur-Wishnev vs 7-Ramakrishnan-Ramakrishnan
100 3.50 0.50 4-Huckabay-Hall vs 6-Babbe-Sager
110 2.00 2.00 8-Fineberg-Fidelman vs 5-Kavall-Giberson
150 1.00 3.00 1-Mikkelsen-Ambrosio vs 9-Vasilevsky-Vasilevsky
400 0.00 4.00 10-Themis-Wilkie vs 3-Johnson-Gagnon
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
170 4.00 0.00 9-Vasilevsky-Vasilevsky vs 6-Babbe-Sager
100 2.50 1.50 3-Johnson-Gagnon vs 8-Fineberg-Fidelman
100 2.50 1.50 5-Kavall-Giberson vs 7-Ramakrishnan-Ramakrishnan
110 1.00 3.00 2-Lafleur-Wishnev vs 1-Mikkelsen-Ambrosio
130 0.00 4.00 10-Themis-Wilkie vs 4-Huckabay-Hall
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
200 4.00 0.00 9-Vasilevsky-Vasilevsky vs 6-Babbe-Sager
230 3.00 1.00 3-Johnson-Gagnon vs 8-Fineberg-Fidelman
480 2.00 2.00 10-Themis-Wilkie vs 4-Huckabay-Hall
490 0.50 3.50 2-Lafleur-Wishnev vs 1-Mikkelsen-Ambrosio
490 0.50 3.50 5-Kavall-Giberson vs 7-Ramakrishnan-Ramakrishnan
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
200 4.00 0.00 9-Vasilevsky-Vasilevsky vs 6-Babbe-Sager
400 2.50 1.50 3-Johnson-Gagnon vs 8-Fineberg-Fidelman
400 2.50 1.50 5-Kavall-Giberson vs 7-Ramakrishnan-Ramakrishnan
430 0.50 3.50 2-Lafleur-Wishnev vs 1-Mikkelsen-Ambrosio
430 0.50 3.50 10-Themis-Wilkie vs 4-Huckabay-Hall
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
200 4.00 0.00 6-Babbe-Sager vs 8-Fineberg-Fidelman
170 3.00 1.00 3-Johnson-Gagnon vs 2-Lafleur-Wishnev
50 2.00 2.00 1-Mikkelsen-Ambrosio vs 7-Ramakrishnan-Ramakrishnan
100 1.00 3.00 4-Huckabay-Hall vs 9-Vasilevsky-Vasilevsky
120 0.00 4.00 10-Themis-Wilkie vs 5-Kavall-Giberson
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
100 3.50 0.50 1-Mikkelsen-Ambrosio vs 7-Ramakrishnan-Ramakrishnan
100 3.50 0.50 3-Johnson-Gagnon vs 2-Lafleur-Wishnev
140 1.50 2.50 6-Babbe-Sager vs 8-Fineberg-Fidelman
140 1.50 2.50 10-Themis-Wilkie vs 5-Kavall-Giberson
200 0.00 4.00 4-Huckabay-Hall vs 9-Vasilevsky-Vasilevsky
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
480 4.00 0.00 1-Mikkelsen-Ambrosio vs 7-Ramakrishnan-Ramakrishnan
520 3.00 1.00 3-Johnson-Gagnon vs 2-Lafleur-Wishnev
980 2.00 2.00 10-Themis-Wilkie vs 5-Kavall-Giberson
1010 0.50 3.50 4-Huckabay-Hall vs 9-Vasilevsky-Vasilevsky
1010 0.50 3.50 6-Babbe-Sager vs 8-Fineberg-Fidelman
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
430 3.00 1.00 2-Lafleur-Wishnev vs 8-Fineberg-Fidelman
430 3.00 1.00 5-Kavall-Giberson vs 1-Mikkelsen-Ambrosio
430 3.00 1.00 10-Themis-Wilkie vs 6-Babbe-Sager
150 1.00 3.00 4-Huckabay-Hall vs 3-Johnson-Gagnon
150 0.00 4.00 7-Ramakrishnan-Ramakrishnan vs 9-Vasilevsky-Vasilevsk
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
200 4.00 0.00 5-Kavall-Giberson vs 1-Mikkelsen-Ambrosio
130 2.50 1.50 4-Huckabay-Hall vs 3-Johnson-Gagnon
130 2.50 1.50 7-Ramakrishnan-Ramakrishnan vs 9-Vasilevsky-Vasilevsk
120 1.00 3.00 2-Lafleur-Wishnev vs 8-Fineberg-Fidelman
110 0.00 4.00 10-Themis-Wilkie vs 6-Babbe-Sager
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
100 4.00 0.00 7-Ramakrishnan-Ramakrishnan vs 9-Vasilevsky-Vasilevsk
50 2.00 2.00 2-Lafleur-Wishnev vs 8-Fineberg-Fidelman
50 2.00 2.00 5-Kavall-Giberson vs 1-Mikkelsen-Ambrosio
50 2.00 2.00 10-Themis-Wilkie vs 6-Babbe-Sager
100 0.00 4.00 4-Huckabay-Hall vs 3-Johnson-Gagnon
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
200 4.00 0.00 5-Kavall-Giberson vs 4-Huckabay-Hall
140 3.00 1.00 8-Fineberg-Fidelman vs 1-Mikkelsen-Ambrosio
50 1.50 2.50 3-Johnson-Gagnon vs 9-Vasilevsky-Vasilevsky
50 1.50 2.50 10-Themis-Wilkie vs 7-Ramakrishnan-Ramakrishnan
110 0.00 4.00 6-Babbe-Sager vs 2-Lafleur-Wishnev
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
680 2.50 1.50 3-Johnson-Gagnon vs 9-Vasilevsky-Vasilevsky
680 2.50 1.50 5-Kavall-Giberson vs 4-Huckabay-Hall
680 2.50 1.50 8-Fineberg-Fidelman vs 1-Mikkelsen-Ambrosio
680 2.50 1.50 10-Themis-Wilkie vs 7-Ramakrishnan-Ramakrishnan
650 0.00 4.00 6-Babbe-Sager vs 2-Lafleur-Wishnev
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
90 4.00 0.00 5-Kavall-Giberson vs 4-Huckabay-Hall
190 3.00 1.00 8-Fineberg-Fidelman vs 1-Mikkelsen-Ambrosio
440 2.00 2.00 10-Themis-Wilkie vs 7-Ramakrishnan-Ramakrishnan
490 1.00 3.00 3-Johnson-Gagnon vs 9-Vasilevsky-Vasilevsky
920 0.00 4.00 6-Babbe-Sager vs 2-Lafleur-Wishnev
|