|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
450 1.50 0.50 4-Huckabay-Vasilevsky vs 2-Dunkley-Hancock
450 1.50 0.50 5-Stella-McCormick vs 3-Caplan-Vasilevsky
460 0.00 2.00 6-Mikkelsen-Wanamaker vs 1-Hayden-Finch
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
420 1.50 0.50 5-Stella-McCormick vs 3-Caplan-Vasilevsky
420 1.50 0.50 6-Mikkelsen-Wanamaker vs 1-Hayden-Finch
430 0.00 2.00 4-Huckabay-Vasilevsky vs 2-Dunkley-Hancock
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
200 2.00 0.00 4-Huckabay-Vasilevsky vs 2-Dunkley-Hancock
1430 0.50 1.50 5-Stella-McCormick vs 3-Caplan-Vasilevsky
1430 0.50 1.50 6-Mikkelsen-Wanamaker vs 1-Hayden-Finch
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
170 2.00 0.00 4-Huckabay-Vasilevsky vs 2-Dunkley-Hancock
200 1.00 1.00 5-Stella-McCormick vs 3-Caplan-Vasilevsky
620 0.00 2.00 6-Mikkelsen-Wanamaker vs 1-Hayden-Finch
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
520 2.00 0.00 6-Mikkelsen-Wanamaker vs 1-Hayden-Finch
1020 0.50 1.50 4-Huckabay-Vasilevsky vs 2-Dunkley-Hancock
1020 0.50 1.50 5-Stella-McCormick vs 3-Caplan-Vasilevsky
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
430 2.00 0.00 4-Huckabay-Vasilevsky vs 3-Caplan-Vasilevsky
420 1.00 1.00 6-Mikkelsen-Wanamaker vs 2-Dunkley-Hancock
400 0.00 2.00 1-Hayden-Finch vs 5-Stella-McCormick
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
650 1.50 0.50 1-Hayden-Finch vs 5-Stella-McCormick
650 1.50 0.50 6-Mikkelsen-Wanamaker vs 2-Dunkley-Hancock
680 0.00 2.00 4-Huckabay-Vasilevsky vs 3-Caplan-Vasilevsky
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
400 1.50 0.50 1-Hayden-Finch vs 5-Stella-McCormick
400 1.50 0.50 4-Huckabay-Vasilevsky vs 3-Caplan-Vasilevsky
50 0.00 2.00 6-Mikkelsen-Wanamaker vs 2-Dunkley-Hancock
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
1100 2.00 0.00 6-Mikkelsen-Wanamaker vs 2-Dunkley-Hancock
980 1.00 1.00 4-Huckabay-Vasilevsky vs 3-Caplan-Vasilevsky
480 0.00 2.00 1-Hayden-Finch vs 5-Stella-McCormick
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
140 2.00 0.00 4-Huckabay-Vasilevsky vs 3-Caplan-Vasilevsky
110 1.00 1.00 1-Hayden-Finch vs 5-Stella-McCormick
90 0.00 2.00 6-Mikkelsen-Wanamaker vs 2-Dunkley-Hancock
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
110 2.00 0.00 5-Stella-McCormick vs 4-Huckabay-Vasilevsky
50 1.00 1.00 6-Mikkelsen-Wanamaker vs 3-Caplan-Vasilevsky
100 0.00 2.00 2-Dunkley-Hancock vs 1-Hayden-Finch
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
650 2.00 0.00 2-Dunkley-Hancock vs 1-Hayden-Finch
620 1.00 1.00 6-Mikkelsen-Wanamaker vs 3-Caplan-Vasilevsky
140 0.00 2.00 5-Stella-McCormick vs 4-Huckabay-Vasilevsky
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
500 1.50 0.50 2-Dunkley-Hancock vs 1-Hayden-Finch
500 1.50 0.50 5-Stella-McCormick vs 4-Huckabay-Vasilevsky
100 0.00 2.00 6-Mikkelsen-Wanamaker vs 3-Caplan-Vasilevsky
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
140 1.50 0.50 2-Dunkley-Hancock vs 1-Hayden-Finch
140 1.50 0.50 5-Stella-McCormick vs 4-Huckabay-Vasilevsky
420 0.00 2.00 6-Mikkelsen-Wanamaker vs 3-Caplan-Vasilevsky
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
400 1.50 0.50 5-Stella-McCormick vs 4-Huckabay-Vasilevsky
400 1.50 0.50 6-Mikkelsen-Wanamaker vs 3-Caplan-Vasilevsky
500 0.00 2.00 2-Dunkley-Hancock vs 1-Hayden-Finch
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
200 2.00 0.00 2-Dunkley-Hancock vs 5-Stella-McCormick
100 1.00 1.00 3-Caplan-Vasilevsky vs 1-Hayden-Finch
140 0.00 2.00 6-Mikkelsen-Wanamaker vs 4-Huckabay-Vasilevsky
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
450 2.00 0.00 2-Dunkley-Hancock vs 5-Stella-McCormick
480 1.00 1.00 3-Caplan-Vasilevsky vs 1-Hayden-Finch
980 0.00 2.00 6-Mikkelsen-Wanamaker vs 4-Huckabay-Vasilevsky
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
200 2.00 0.00 3-Caplan-Vasilevsky vs 1-Hayden-Finch
420 1.00 1.00 2-Dunkley-Hancock vs 5-Stella-McCormick
480 0.00 2.00 6-Mikkelsen-Wanamaker vs 4-Huckabay-Vasilevsky
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
710 2.00 0.00 2-Dunkley-Hancock vs 5-Stella-McCormick
1460 0.50 1.50 3-Caplan-Vasilevsky vs 1-Hayden-Finch
1460 0.50 1.50 6-Mikkelsen-Wanamaker vs 4-Huckabay-Vasilevsky
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
180 2.00 0.00 6-Mikkelsen-Wanamaker vs 4-Huckabay-Vasilevsky
600 0.50 1.50 2-Dunkley-Hancock vs 5-Stella-McCormick
600 0.50 1.50 3-Caplan-Vasilevsky vs 1-Hayden-Finch
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
620 2.00 0.00 6-Mikkelsen-Wanamaker vs 5-Stella-McCormick
100 1.00 1.00 1-Hayden-Finch vs 4-Huckabay-Vasilevsky
200 0.00 2.00 3-Caplan-Vasilevsky vs 2-Dunkley-Hancock
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
140 2.00 0.00 6-Mikkelsen-Wanamaker vs 5-Stella-McCormick
600 1.00 1.00 1-Hayden-Finch vs 4-Huckabay-Vasilevsky
630 0.00 2.00 3-Caplan-Vasilevsky vs 2-Dunkley-Hancock
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
100 1.50 0.50 1-Hayden-Finch vs 4-Huckabay-Vasilevsky
100 1.50 0.50 3-Caplan-Vasilevsky vs 2-Dunkley-Hancock
110 0.00 2.00 6-Mikkelsen-Wanamaker vs 5-Stella-McCormick
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
420 2.00 0.00 6-Mikkelsen-Wanamaker vs 5-Stella-McCormick
50 0.50 1.50 1-Hayden-Finch vs 4-Huckabay-Vasilevsky
50 0.50 1.50 3-Caplan-Vasilevsky vs 2-Dunkley-Hancock
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
210 2.00 0.00 6-Mikkelsen-Wanamaker vs 5-Stella-McCormick
600 1.00 1.00 1-Hayden-Finch vs 4-Huckabay-Vasilevsky
630 0.00 2.00 3-Caplan-Vasilevsky vs 2-Dunkley-Hancock
|