|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
450 3.00 0.00 10-Contarsy-Lotief vs 8-Poh-Fisher
420 2.00 1.00 6-Jones-Ledbetter vs 5-Wanamaker-Sadi
170 1.00 2.00 9-Schanz-Harrington vs 2-Geil-Geil
450 0.00 3.00 4-Sulerud-Baltz vs 1-Gillespie-Huckabay
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
140 1.50 1.50 4-Sulerud-Baltz vs 1-Gillespie-Huckabay
140 1.50 1.50 6-Jones-Ledbetter vs 5-Wanamaker-Sadi
140 1.50 1.50 9-Schanz-Harrington vs 2-Geil-Geil
140 1.50 1.50 10-Contarsy-Lotief vs 8-Poh-Fisher
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
110 3.00 0.00 6-Jones-Ledbetter vs 5-Wanamaker-Sadi
120 2.00 1.00 9-Schanz-Harrington vs 2-Geil-Geil
140 1.00 2.00 4-Sulerud-Baltz vs 1-Gillespie-Huckabay
150 0.00 3.00 10-Contarsy-Lotief vs 8-Poh-Fisher
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
120 3.00 0.00 7-Dunkley-Vasilevsky vs 6-Jones-Ledbetter
200 1.50 1.50 5-Wanamaker-Sadi vs 2-Geil-Geil
200 1.50 1.50 8-Poh-Fisher vs 4-Sulerud-Baltz
300 0.00 3.00 10-Contarsy-Lotief vs 9-Schanz-Harrington
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
230 3.00 0.00 10-Contarsy-Lotief vs 9-Schanz-Harrington
460 1.00 2.00 5-Wanamaker-Sadi vs 2-Geil-Geil
460 1.00 2.00 7-Dunkley-Vasilevsky vs 6-Jones-Ledbetter
460 1.00 2.00 8-Poh-Fisher vs 4-Sulerud-Baltz
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
200 3.00 0.00 5-Wanamaker-Sadi vs 2-Geil-Geil
100 2.00 1.00 7-Dunkley-Vasilevsky vs 6-Jones-Ledbetter
140 1.00 2.00 8-Poh-Fisher vs 4-Sulerud-Baltz
170 0.00 3.00 10-Contarsy-Lotief vs 9-Schanz-Harrington
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
200 3.00 0.00 10-Contarsy-Lotief vs 1-Gillespie-Huckabay
170 2.00 1.00 8-Poh-Fisher vs 7-Dunkley-Vasilevsky
130 1.00 2.00 9-Schanz-Harrington vs 5-Wanamaker-Sadi
100 0.00 3.00 2-Geil-Geil vs 4-Sulerud-Baltz
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
420 3.00 0.00 8-Poh-Fisher vs 7-Dunkley-Vasilevsky
110 2.00 1.00 9-Schanz-Harrington vs 5-Wanamaker-Sadi
50 1.00 2.00 2-Geil-Geil vs 4-Sulerud-Baltz
50 0.00 3.00 10-Contarsy-Lotief vs 1-Gillespie-Huckabay
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
680 2.00 1.00 2-Geil-Geil vs 4-Sulerud-Baltz
680 2.00 1.00 9-Schanz-Harrington vs 5-Wanamaker-Sadi
680 2.00 1.00 10-Contarsy-Lotief vs 1-Gillespie-Huckabay
690 0.00 3.00 8-Poh-Fisher vs 7-Dunkley-Vasilevsky
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
140 3.00 0.00 7-Dunkley-Vasilevsky vs 4-Sulerud-Baltz
170 1.50 1.50 1-Gillespie-Huckabay vs 6-Jones-Ledbetter
170 1.50 1.50 9-Schanz-Harrington vs 8-Poh-Fisher
400 0.00 3.00 10-Contarsy-Lotief vs 2-Geil-Geil
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
250 3.00 0.00 7-Dunkley-Vasilevsky vs 4-Sulerud-Baltz
100 2.00 1.00 9-Schanz-Harrington vs 8-Poh-Fisher
50 1.00 2.00 10-Contarsy-Lotief vs 2-Geil-Geil
400 0.00 3.00 1-Gillespie-Huckabay vs 6-Jones-Ledbetter
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
600 2.50 0.50 1-Gillespie-Huckabay vs 6-Jones-Ledbetter
600 2.50 0.50 7-Dunkley-Vasilevsky vs 4-Sulerud-Baltz
100 1.00 2.00 9-Schanz-Harrington vs 8-Poh-Fisher
100 0.00 3.00 10-Contarsy-Lotief vs 2-Geil-Geil
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
140 3.00 0.00 1-Gillespie-Huckabay vs 9-Schanz-Harrington
620 2.00 1.00 4-Sulerud-Baltz vs 6-Jones-Ledbetter
650 0.50 2.50 2-Geil-Geil vs 7-Dunkley-Vasilevsky
650 0.50 2.50 8-Poh-Fisher vs 5-Wanamaker-Sadi
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
420 3.00 0.00 1-Gillespie-Huckabay vs 9-Schanz-Harrington
110 1.50 1.50 4-Sulerud-Baltz vs 6-Jones-Ledbetter
110 1.50 1.50 8-Poh-Fisher vs 5-Wanamaker-Sadi
50 0.00 3.00 2-Geil-Geil vs 7-Dunkley-Vasilevsky
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
150 3.00 0.00 2-Geil-Geil vs 7-Dunkley-Vasilevsky
120 2.00 1.00 1-Gillespie-Huckabay vs 9-Schanz-Harrington
100 1.00 2.00 8-Poh-Fisher vs 5-Wanamaker-Sadi
50 0.00 3.00 4-Sulerud-Baltz vs 6-Jones-Ledbetter
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
620 3.00 0.00 9-Schanz-Harrington vs 6-Jones-Ledbetter
650 1.00 2.00 2-Geil-Geil vs 1-Gillespie-Huckabay
650 1.00 2.00 5-Wanamaker-Sadi vs 7-Dunkley-Vasilevsky
650 1.00 2.00 10-Contarsy-Lotief vs 4-Sulerud-Baltz
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
50 3.00 0.00 2-Geil-Geil vs 1-Gillespie-Huckabay
170 2.00 1.00 10-Contarsy-Lotief vs 4-Sulerud-Baltz
420 0.50 2.50 5-Wanamaker-Sadi vs 7-Dunkley-Vasilevsky
420 0.50 2.50 9-Schanz-Harrington vs 6-Jones-Ledbetter
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
460 3.00 0.00 10-Contarsy-Lotief vs 4-Sulerud-Baltz
490 1.50 1.50 2-Geil-Geil vs 1-Gillespie-Huckabay
490 1.50 1.50 9-Schanz-Harrington vs 6-Jones-Ledbetter
770 0.00 3.00 5-Wanamaker-Sadi vs 7-Dunkley-Vasilevsky
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
400 3.00 0.00 1-Gillespie-Huckabay vs 7-Dunkley-Vasilevsky
200 2.00 1.00 10-Contarsy-Lotief vs 5-Wanamaker-Sadi
100 1.00 2.00 6-Jones-Ledbetter vs 8-Poh-Fisher
110 0.00 3.00 4-Sulerud-Baltz vs 9-Schanz-Harrington
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
200 3.00 0.00 4-Sulerud-Baltz vs 9-Schanz-Harrington
100 1.00 2.00 1-Gillespie-Huckabay vs 7-Dunkley-Vasilevsky
100 1.00 2.00 6-Jones-Ledbetter vs 8-Poh-Fisher
100 1.00 2.00 10-Contarsy-Lotief vs 5-Wanamaker-Sadi
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
620 1.50 1.50 1-Gillespie-Huckabay vs 7-Dunkley-Vasilevsky
620 1.50 1.50 4-Sulerud-Baltz vs 9-Schanz-Harrington
620 1.50 1.50 6-Jones-Ledbetter vs 8-Poh-Fisher
620 1.50 1.50 10-Contarsy-Lotief vs 5-Wanamaker-Sadi
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
110 3.00 0.00 2-Geil-Geil vs 8-Poh-Fisher
140 1.50 1.50 5-Wanamaker-Sadi vs 1-Gillespie-Huckabay
140 1.50 1.50 10-Contarsy-Lotief vs 6-Jones-Ledbetter
150 0.00 3.00 7-Dunkley-Vasilevsky vs 9-Schanz-Harrington
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
800 3.00 0.00 5-Wanamaker-Sadi vs 1-Gillespie-Huckabay
300 2.00 1.00 2-Geil-Geil vs 8-Poh-Fisher
200 1.00 2.00 10-Contarsy-Lotief vs 6-Jones-Ledbetter
140 0.00 3.00 7-Dunkley-Vasilevsky vs 9-Schanz-Harrington
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
50 2.50 0.50 2-Geil-Geil vs 8-Poh-Fisher
50 2.50 0.50 7-Dunkley-Vasilevsky vs 9-Schanz-Harrington
110 0.50 2.50 5-Wanamaker-Sadi vs 1-Gillespie-Huckabay
110 0.50 2.50 10-Contarsy-Lotief vs 6-Jones-Ledbetter
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
120 2.50 0.50 8-Poh-Fisher vs 1-Gillespie-Huckabay
120 2.50 0.50 10-Contarsy-Lotief vs 7-Dunkley-Vasilevsky
110 1.00 2.00 5-Wanamaker-Sadi vs 4-Sulerud-Baltz
50 0.00 3.00 6-Jones-Ledbetter vs 2-Geil-Geil
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
500 3.00 0.00 6-Jones-Ledbetter vs 2-Geil-Geil
200 2.00 1.00 8-Poh-Fisher vs 1-Gillespie-Huckabay
100 0.50 2.50 5-Wanamaker-Sadi vs 4-Sulerud-Baltz
100 0.50 2.50 10-Contarsy-Lotief vs 7-Dunkley-Vasilevsky
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
140 3.00 0.00 6-Jones-Ledbetter vs 2-Geil-Geil
50 1.00 2.00 5-Wanamaker-Sadi vs 4-Sulerud-Baltz
50 1.00 2.00 8-Poh-Fisher vs 1-Gillespie-Huckabay
50 1.00 2.00 10-Contarsy-Lotief vs 7-Dunkley-Vasilevsky
|