|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
90 3.00 0.00 7-Lotief-Ambrosio vs 3-Arellano-Modica
50 1.00 2.00 4-Hall-Mintz vs 2-Kavall-Fidelman
50 1.00 2.00 6-Vasilevsky-Vasilevsky vs 5-Reams-Reams
50 1.00 2.00 8-Phillips-Phillips, Jr vs 1-Chun-Mikkelson
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
660 3.00 0.00 6-Vasilevsky-Vasilevsky vs 5-Reams-Reams
630 1.00 2.00 4-Hall-Mintz vs 2-Kavall-Fidelman
630 1.00 2.00 7-Lotief-Ambrosio vs 3-Arellano-Modica
630 1.00 2.00 8-Phillips-Phillips, Jr vs 1-Chun-Mikkelson
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
110 3.00 0.00 8-Phillips-Phillips, Jr vs 1-Chun-Mikkelson
170 2.00 1.00 6-Vasilevsky-Vasilevsky vs 5-Reams-Reams
640 1.00 2.00 7-Lotief-Ambrosio vs 3-Arellano-Modica
680 0.00 3.00 4-Hall-Mintz vs 2-Kavall-Fidelman
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
140 3.00 0.00 6-Vasilevsky-Vasilevsky vs 5-Reams-Reams
100 2.00 1.00 8-Phillips-Phillips, Jr vs 1-Chun-Mikkelson
110 1.00 2.00 7-Lotief-Ambrosio vs 3-Arellano-Modica
120 0.00 3.00 4-Hall-Mintz vs 2-Kavall-Fidelman
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
1050 3.00 0.00 7-Lotief-Ambrosio vs 6-Vasilevsky-Vasilevsky
650 1.00 2.00 1-Chun-Mikkelson vs 4-Hall-Mintz
650 1.00 2.00 5-Reams-Reams vs 3-Arellano-Modica
650 1.00 2.00 8-Phillips-Phillips, Jr vs 2-Kavall-Fidelman
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
140 3.00 0.00 1-Chun-Mikkelson vs 4-Hall-Mintz
50 2.00 1.00 5-Reams-Reams vs 3-Arellano-Modica
100 1.00 2.00 7-Lotief-Ambrosio vs 6-Vasilevsky-Vasilevsky
670 0.00 3.00 8-Phillips-Phillips, Jr vs 2-Kavall-Fidelman
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
200 3.00 0.00 5-Reams-Reams vs 3-Arellano-Modica
100 2.00 1.00 1-Chun-Mikkelson vs 4-Hall-Mintz
140 1.00 2.00 8-Phillips-Phillips, Jr vs 2-Kavall-Fidelman
170 0.00 3.00 7-Lotief-Ambrosio vs 6-Vasilevsky-Vasilevsky
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
100 3.00 0.00 7-Lotief-Ambrosio vs 6-Vasilevsky-Vasilevsky
50 2.00 1.00 1-Chun-Mikkelson vs 4-Hall-Mintz
100 1.00 2.00 8-Phillips-Phillips, Jr vs 2-Kavall-Fidelman
110 0.00 3.00 5-Reams-Reams vs 3-Arellano-Modica
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
480 3.00 0.00 8-Phillips-Phillips, Jr vs 3-Arellano-Modica
200 1.00 2.00 1-Chun-Mikkelson vs 7-Lotief-Ambrosio
200 1.00 2.00 2-Kavall-Fidelman vs 5-Reams-Reams
200 1.00 2.00 6-Vasilevsky-Vasilevsky vs 4-Hall-Mintz
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
200 3.00 0.00 2-Kavall-Fidelman vs 5-Reams-Reams
150 2.00 1.00 1-Chun-Mikkelson vs 7-Lotief-Ambrosio
100 1.00 2.00 6-Vasilevsky-Vasilevsky vs 4-Hall-Mintz
100 0.00 3.00 8-Phillips-Phillips, Jr vs 3-Arellano-Modica
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
480 1.50 1.50 1-Chun-Mikkelson vs 7-Lotief-Ambrosio
480 1.50 1.50 2-Kavall-Fidelman vs 5-Reams-Reams
480 1.50 1.50 6-Vasilevsky-Vasilevsky vs 4-Hall-Mintz
480 1.50 1.50 8-Phillips-Phillips, Jr vs 3-Arellano-Modica
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
150 3.00 0.00 2-Kavall-Fidelman vs 5-Reams-Reams
110 2.00 1.00 6-Vasilevsky-Vasilevsky vs 4-Hall-Mintz
90 1.00 2.00 8-Phillips-Phillips, Jr vs 3-Arellano-Modica
110 0.00 3.00 1-Chun-Mikkelson vs 7-Lotief-Ambrosio
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
100 3.00 0.00 7-Lotief-Ambrosio vs 5-Reams-Reams
110 1.50 1.50 3-Arellano-Modica vs 6-Vasilevsky-Vasilevsky
110 1.50 1.50 8-Phillips-Phillips, Jr vs 4-Hall-Mintz
200 0.00 3.00 2-Kavall-Fidelman vs 1-Chun-Mikkelson
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
50 3.00 0.00 8-Phillips-Phillips, Jr vs 4-Hall-Mintz
980 2.00 1.00 3-Arellano-Modica vs 6-Vasilevsky-Vasilevsky
990 0.50 2.50 2-Kavall-Fidelman vs 1-Chun-Mikkelson
990 0.50 2.50 7-Lotief-Ambrosio vs 5-Reams-Reams
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
130 3.00 0.00 2-Kavall-Fidelman vs 1-Chun-Mikkelson
110 2.00 1.00 8-Phillips-Phillips, Jr vs 4-Hall-Mintz
100 0.50 2.50 3-Arellano-Modica vs 6-Vasilevsky-Vasilevsky
100 0.50 2.50 7-Lotief-Ambrosio vs 5-Reams-Reams
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
300 3.00 0.00 7-Lotief-Ambrosio vs 5-Reams-Reams
100 2.00 1.00 3-Arellano-Modica vs 6-Vasilevsky-Vasilevsky
140 1.00 2.00 8-Phillips-Phillips, Jr vs 4-Hall-Mintz
620 0.00 3.00 2-Kavall-Fidelman vs 1-Chun-Mikkelson
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
120 3.00 0.00 8-Phillips-Phillips, Jr vs 5-Reams-Reams
100 2.00 1.00 1-Chun-Mikkelson vs 6-Vasilevsky-Vasilevsky
90 1.00 2.00 3-Arellano-Modica vs 2-Kavall-Fidelman
120 0.00 3.00 4-Hall-Mintz vs 7-Lotief-Ambrosio
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
50 3.00 0.00 3-Arellano-Modica vs 2-Kavall-Fidelman
100 2.00 1.00 8-Phillips-Phillips, Jr vs 5-Reams-Reams
130 1.00 2.00 4-Hall-Mintz vs 7-Lotief-Ambrosio
550 0.00 3.00 1-Chun-Mikkelson vs 6-Vasilevsky-Vasilevsky
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
50 2.00 1.00 1-Chun-Mikkelson vs 6-Vasilevsky-Vasilevsky
50 2.00 1.00 4-Hall-Mintz vs 7-Lotief-Ambrosio
50 2.00 1.00 8-Phillips-Phillips, Jr vs 5-Reams-Reams
620 0.00 3.00 3-Arellano-Modica vs 2-Kavall-Fidelman
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
620 1.50 1.50 1-Chun-Mikkelson vs 6-Vasilevsky-Vasilevsky
620 1.50 1.50 3-Arellano-Modica vs 2-Kavall-Fidelman
620 1.50 1.50 4-Hall-Mintz vs 7-Lotief-Ambrosio
620 1.50 1.50 8-Phillips-Phillips, Jr vs 5-Reams-Reams
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
680 3.00 0.00 8-Phillips-Phillips, Jr vs 6-Vasilevsky-Vasilevsky
650 2.00 1.00 4-Hall-Mintz vs 3-Arellano-Modica
600 1.00 2.00 5-Reams-Reams vs 1-Chun-Mikkelson
130 0.00 3.00 2-Kavall-Fidelman vs 7-Lotief-Ambrosio
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
100 2.50 0.50 2-Kavall-Fidelman vs 7-Lotief-Ambrosio
100 2.50 0.50 5-Reams-Reams vs 1-Chun-Mikkelson
50 1.00 2.00 8-Phillips-Phillips, Jr vs 6-Vasilevsky-Vasilevsky
100 0.00 3.00 4-Hall-Mintz vs 3-Arellano-Modica
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
100 3.00 0.00 4-Hall-Mintz vs 3-Arellano-Modica
110 1.50 1.50 2-Kavall-Fidelman vs 7-Lotief-Ambrosio
110 1.50 1.50 5-Reams-Reams vs 1-Chun-Mikkelson
300 0.00 3.00 8-Phillips-Phillips, Jr vs 6-Vasilevsky-Vasilevsky
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
50 3.00 0.00 4-Hall-Mintz vs 3-Arellano-Modica
100 2.00 1.00 8-Phillips-Phillips, Jr vs 6-Vasilevsky-Vasilevsky
140 1.00 2.00 5-Reams-Reams vs 1-Chun-Mikkelson
170 0.00 3.00 2-Kavall-Fidelman vs 7-Lotief-Ambrosio
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
50 3.00 0.00 8-Phillips-Phillips, Jr vs 7-Lotief-Ambrosio
100 2.00 1.00 6-Vasilevsky-Vasilevsky vs 2-Kavall-Fidelman
130 1.00 2.00 5-Reams-Reams vs 4-Hall-Mintz
170 0.00 3.00 3-Arellano-Modica vs 1-Chun-Mikkelson
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
140 3.00 0.00 6-Vasilevsky-Vasilevsky vs 2-Kavall-Fidelman
200 2.00 1.00 8-Phillips-Phillips, Jr vs 7-Lotief-Ambrosio
300 0.50 2.50 3-Arellano-Modica vs 1-Chun-Mikkelson
300 0.50 2.50 5-Reams-Reams vs 4-Hall-Mintz
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
110 3.00 0.00 8-Phillips-Phillips, Jr vs 7-Lotief-Ambrosio
100 2.00 1.00 3-Arellano-Modica vs 1-Chun-Mikkelson
50 1.00 2.00 6-Vasilevsky-Vasilevsky vs 2-Kavall-Fidelman
180 0.00 3.00 5-Reams-Reams vs 4-Hall-Mintz
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
600 2.00 1.00 5-Reams-Reams vs 4-Hall-Mintz
600 2.00 1.00 6-Vasilevsky-Vasilevsky vs 2-Kavall-Fidelman
600 2.00 1.00 8-Phillips-Phillips, Jr vs 7-Lotief-Ambrosio
120 0.00 3.00 3-Arellano-Modica vs 1-Chun-Mikkelson
|