|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
150 4.00 0.00 6-Mikkelson-Dunkley vs 10-Kavall-Ambrosio
90 3.00 1.00 9-Geil-Geil vs 7-Holmgren-Holmgren
100 2.00 2.00 8-Vasilevsky-Vasilevsky vs 4-Holcombe-Holcombe
200 1.00 3.00 12-Hayden-Fidelman vs 1-Gagnon-Johnson
500 0.00 4.00 3-Reams-Reams vs 11-Hall-Arellano
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
690 4.00 0.00 9-Geil-Geil vs 7-Holmgren-Holmgren
680 2.50 1.50 8-Vasilevsky-Vasilevsky vs 4-Holcombe-Holcombe
680 2.50 1.50 12-Hayden-Fidelman vs 1-Gagnon-Johnson
630 1.00 3.00 6-Mikkelson-Dunkley vs 10-Kavall-Ambrosio
170 0.00 4.00 3-Reams-Reams vs 11-Hall-Arellano
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
200 4.00 0.00 6-Mikkelson-Dunkley vs 10-Kavall-Ambrosio
170 3.00 1.00 8-Vasilevsky-Vasilevsky vs 4-Holcombe-Holcombe
100 2.00 2.00 3-Reams-Reams vs 11-Hall-Arellano
620 1.00 3.00 12-Hayden-Fidelman vs 1-Gagnon-Johnson
850 0.00 4.00 9-Geil-Geil vs 7-Holmgren-Holmgren
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
110 4.00 0.00 6-Mikkelson-Dunkley vs 3-Reams-Reams
100 3.00 1.00 1-Gagnon-Johnson vs 8-Vasilevsky-Vasilevsky
130 1.00 3.00 7-Holmgren-Holmgren vs 10-Kavall-Ambrosio
130 1.00 3.00 11-Hall-Arellano vs 4-Holcombe-Holcombe
130 1.00 3.00 12-Hayden-Fidelman vs 2-Phillips-Phillips, Jr
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
200 4.00 0.00 1-Gagnon-Johnson vs 8-Vasilevsky-Vasilevsky
110 2.50 1.50 6-Mikkelson-Dunkley vs 3-Reams-Reams
110 2.50 1.50 7-Holmgren-Holmgren vs 10-Kavall-Ambrosio
90 1.00 3.00 11-Hall-Arellano vs 4-Holcombe-Holcombe
100 0.00 4.00 12-Hayden-Fidelman vs 2-Phillips-Phillips, Jr
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
100 4.00 0.00 7-Holmgren-Holmgren vs 10-Kavall-Ambrosio
50 3.00 1.00 12-Hayden-Fidelman vs 2-Phillips-Phillips, Jr
130 2.00 2.00 6-Mikkelson-Dunkley vs 3-Reams-Reams
150 0.50 3.50 1-Gagnon-Johnson vs 8-Vasilevsky-Vasilevsky
150 0.50 3.50 11-Hall-Arellano vs 4-Holcombe-Holcombe
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
140 4.00 0.00 12-Hayden-Fidelman vs 3-Reams-Reams
120 3.00 1.00 1-Gagnon-Johnson vs 6-Mikkelson-Dunkley
90 1.00 3.00 2-Phillips-Phillips, Jr vs 9-Geil-Geil
90 1.00 3.00 7-Holmgren-Holmgren vs 4-Holcombe-Holcombe
90 1.00 3.00 10-Kavall-Ambrosio vs 8-Vasilevsky-Vasilevsky
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
450 3.50 0.50 1-Gagnon-Johnson vs 6-Mikkelson-Dunkley
450 3.50 0.50 12-Hayden-Fidelman vs 3-Reams-Reams
420 2.00 2.00 2-Phillips-Phillips, Jr vs 9-Geil-Geil
300 1.00 3.00 10-Kavall-Ambrosio vs 8-Vasilevsky-Vasilevsky
50 0.00 4.00 7-Holmgren-Holmgren vs 4-Holcombe-Holcombe
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
100 4.00 0.00 10-Kavall-Ambrosio vs 8-Vasilevsky-Vasilevsky
90 3.00 1.00 2-Phillips-Phillips, Jr vs 9-Geil-Geil
140 1.00 3.00 1-Gagnon-Johnson vs 6-Mikkelson-Dunkley
140 1.00 3.00 7-Holmgren-Holmgren vs 4-Holcombe-Holcombe
140 1.00 3.00 12-Hayden-Fidelman vs 3-Reams-Reams
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
90 4.00 0.00 3-Reams-Reams vs 1-Gagnon-Johnson
110 3.00 1.00 12-Hayden-Fidelman vs 4-Holcombe-Holcombe
130 2.00 2.00 10-Kavall-Ambrosio vs 9-Geil-Geil
200 0.50 3.50 2-Phillips-Phillips, Jr vs 7-Holmgren-Holmgren
200 0.50 3.50 11-Hall-Arellano vs 6-Mikkelson-Dunkley
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
420 4.00 0.00 2-Phillips-Phillips, Jr vs 7-Holmgren-Holmgren
480 2.00 2.00 3-Reams-Reams vs 1-Gagnon-Johnson
480 2.00 2.00 10-Kavall-Ambrosio vs 9-Geil-Geil
480 2.00 2.00 12-Hayden-Fidelman vs 4-Holcombe-Holcombe
510 0.00 4.00 11-Hall-Arellano vs 6-Mikkelson-Dunkley
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
50 4.00 0.00 12-Hayden-Fidelman vs 4-Holcombe-Holcombe
130 3.00 1.00 11-Hall-Arellano vs 6-Mikkelson-Dunkley
150 2.00 2.00 10-Kavall-Ambrosio vs 9-Geil-Geil
170 1.00 3.00 2-Phillips-Phillips, Jr vs 7-Holmgren-Holmgren
180 0.00 4.00 3-Reams-Reams vs 1-Gagnon-Johnson
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
650 2.50 1.50 1-Gagnon-Johnson vs 10-Kavall-Ambrosio
650 2.50 1.50 4-Holcombe-Holcombe vs 2-Phillips-Phillips, Jr
650 2.50 1.50 7-Holmgren-Holmgren vs 11-Hall-Arellano
650 2.50 1.50 9-Geil-Geil vs 6-Mikkelson-Dunkley
200 0.00 4.00 3-Reams-Reams vs 8-Vasilevsky-Vasilevsky
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
450 3.50 0.50 1-Gagnon-Johnson vs 10-Kavall-Ambrosio
450 3.50 0.50 9-Geil-Geil vs 6-Mikkelson-Dunkley
140 2.00 2.00 4-Holcombe-Holcombe vs 2-Phillips-Phillips, Jr
110 1.00 3.00 7-Holmgren-Holmgren vs 11-Hall-Arellano
50 0.00 4.00 3-Reams-Reams vs 8-Vasilevsky-Vasilevsky
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
50 3.00 1.00 1-Gagnon-Johnson vs 10-Kavall-Ambrosio
50 3.00 1.00 4-Holcombe-Holcombe vs 2-Phillips-Phillips, Jr
50 3.00 1.00 7-Holmgren-Holmgren vs 11-Hall-Arellano
170 1.00 3.00 9-Geil-Geil vs 6-Mikkelson-Dunkley
200 0.00 4.00 3-Reams-Reams vs 8-Vasilevsky-Vasilevsky
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
150 4.00 0.00 8-Vasilevsky-Vasilevsky vs 11-Hall-Arellano
90 2.00 2.00 1-Gagnon-Johnson vs 7-Holmgren-Holmgren
90 2.00 2.00 4-Holcombe-Holcombe vs 9-Geil-Geil
90 2.00 2.00 12-Hayden-Fidelman vs 6-Mikkelson-Dunkley
110 0.00 4.00 2-Phillips-Phillips, Jr vs 10-Kavall-Ambrosio
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
110 4.00 0.00 1-Gagnon-Johnson vs 7-Holmgren-Holmgren
50 3.00 1.00 8-Vasilevsky-Vasilevsky vs 11-Hall-Arellano
100 2.00 2.00 12-Hayden-Fidelman vs 6-Mikkelson-Dunkley
150 1.00 3.00 4-Holcombe-Holcombe vs 9-Geil-Geil
430 0.00 4.00 2-Phillips-Phillips, Jr vs 10-Kavall-Ambrosio
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
140 4.00 0.00 4-Holcombe-Holcombe vs 9-Geil-Geil
170 3.00 1.00 2-Phillips-Phillips, Jr vs 10-Kavall-Ambrosio
420 1.00 3.00 1-Gagnon-Johnson vs 7-Holmgren-Holmgren
420 1.00 3.00 8-Vasilevsky-Vasilevsky vs 11-Hall-Arellano
420 1.00 3.00 12-Hayden-Fidelman vs 6-Mikkelson-Dunkley
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
200 4.00 0.00 6-Mikkelson-Dunkley vs 4-Holcombe-Holcombe
110 3.00 1.00 2-Phillips-Phillips, Jr vs 8-Vasilevsky-Vasilevsky
50 2.00 2.00 11-Hall-Arellano vs 9-Geil-Geil
100 1.00 3.00 10-Kavall-Ambrosio vs 3-Reams-Reams
150 0.00 4.00 12-Hayden-Fidelman vs 7-Holmgren-Holmgren
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
1430 3.50 0.50 11-Hall-Arellano vs 9-Geil-Geil
1430 3.50 0.50 12-Hayden-Fidelman vs 7-Holmgren-Holmgren
650 1.50 2.50 2-Phillips-Phillips, Jr vs 8-Vasilevsky-Vasilevsky
650 1.50 2.50 10-Kavall-Ambrosio vs 3-Reams-Reams
100 0.00 4.00 6-Mikkelson-Dunkley vs 4-Holcombe-Holcombe
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
430 3.50 0.50 10-Kavall-Ambrosio vs 3-Reams-Reams
430 3.50 0.50 11-Hall-Arellano vs 9-Geil-Geil
460 1.00 3.00 2-Phillips-Phillips, Jr vs 8-Vasilevsky-Vasilevsky
460 1.00 3.00 6-Mikkelson-Dunkley vs 4-Holcombe-Holcombe
460 1.00 3.00 12-Hayden-Fidelman vs 7-Holmgren-Holmgren
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
470 4.00 0.00 11-Hall-Arellano vs 1-Gagnon-Johnson
460 3.00 1.00 12-Hayden-Fidelman vs 8-Vasilevsky-Vasilevsky
430 2.00 2.00 6-Mikkelson-Dunkley vs 2-Phillips-Phillips, Jr
400 1.00 3.00 10-Kavall-Ambrosio vs 4-Holcombe-Holcombe
50 0.00 4.00 3-Reams-Reams vs 9-Geil-Geil
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
660 4.00 0.00 3-Reams-Reams vs 9-Geil-Geil
600 2.50 1.50 10-Kavall-Ambrosio vs 4-Holcombe-Holcombe
600 2.50 1.50 11-Hall-Arellano vs 1-Gagnon-Johnson
130 0.50 3.50 6-Mikkelson-Dunkley vs 2-Phillips-Phillips, Jr
130 0.50 3.50 12-Hayden-Fidelman vs 8-Vasilevsky-Vasilevsky
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
50 3.50 0.50 6-Mikkelson-Dunkley vs 2-Phillips-Phillips, Jr
50 3.50 0.50 10-Kavall-Ambrosio vs 4-Holcombe-Holcombe
430 2.00 2.00 12-Hayden-Fidelman vs 8-Vasilevsky-Vasilevsky
460 0.50 3.50 3-Reams-Reams vs 9-Geil-Geil
460 0.50 3.50 11-Hall-Arellano vs 1-Gagnon-Johnson
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
100 4.00 0.00 8-Vasilevsky-Vasilevsky vs 6-Mikkelson-Dunkley
140 3.00 1.00 7-Holmgren-Holmgren vs 3-Reams-Reams
650 1.00 3.00 2-Phillips-Phillips, Jr vs 11-Hall-Arellano
650 1.00 3.00 4-Holcombe-Holcombe vs 1-Gagnon-Johnson
650 1.00 3.00 12-Hayden-Fidelman vs 9-Geil-Geil
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
300 4.00 0.00 7-Holmgren-Holmgren vs 3-Reams-Reams
100 3.00 1.00 8-Vasilevsky-Vasilevsky vs 6-Mikkelson-Dunkley
300 2.00 2.00 12-Hayden-Fidelman vs 9-Geil-Geil
620 0.50 3.50 2-Phillips-Phillips, Jr vs 11-Hall-Arellano
620 0.50 3.50 4-Holcombe-Holcombe vs 1-Gagnon-Johnson
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
800 4.00 0.00 12-Hayden-Fidelman vs 9-Geil-Geil
300 3.00 1.00 7-Holmgren-Holmgren vs 3-Reams-Reams
200 1.50 2.50 2-Phillips-Phillips, Jr vs 11-Hall-Arellano
200 1.50 2.50 8-Vasilevsky-Vasilevsky vs 6-Mikkelson-Dunkley
110 0.00 4.00 4-Holcombe-Holcombe vs 1-Gagnon-Johnson
|