|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
130 4.00 0.00 5-Krupp-Holmgren vs 4-Hamilton-Houtkooper
50 2.00 2.00 1-Mikkelson-Hancock vs 1-Fleckner-Fleckner
50 2.00 2.00 2-Harrigan-Quintero vs 3-Chun-Vasilevsky
50 2.00 2.00 3-Caplan-Lotief vs 5-Poh-Fisher
100 0.00 4.00 4-Frawley-Vasilevsky vs 2-Baltz-Cooper
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
150 4.00 0.00 4-Frawley-Vasilevsky vs 2-Baltz-Cooper
140 1.50 2.50 1-Mikkelson-Hancock vs 1-Fleckner-Fleckner
140 1.50 2.50 2-Harrigan-Quintero vs 3-Chun-Vasilevsky
140 1.50 2.50 3-Caplan-Lotief vs 5-Poh-Fisher
140 1.50 2.50 5-Krupp-Holmgren vs 4-Hamilton-Houtkooper
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
100 3.00 1.00 2-Harrigan-Quintero vs 3-Chun-Vasilevsky
100 3.00 1.00 4-Frawley-Vasilevsky vs 2-Baltz-Cooper
100 3.00 1.00 5-Krupp-Holmgren vs 4-Hamilton-Houtkooper
150 1.00 3.00 1-Mikkelson-Hancock vs 1-Fleckner-Fleckner
170 0.00 4.00 3-Caplan-Lotief vs 5-Poh-Fisher
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
120 3.50 0.50 1-Mikkelson-Hancock vs 1-Fleckner-Fleckner
120 3.50 0.50 4-Frawley-Vasilevsky vs 2-Baltz-Cooper
150 1.00 3.00 2-Harrigan-Quintero vs 3-Chun-Vasilevsky
150 1.00 3.00 3-Caplan-Lotief vs 5-Poh-Fisher
150 1.00 3.00 5-Krupp-Holmgren vs 4-Hamilton-Houtkooper
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
150 3.50 0.50 2-Harrigan-Quintero vs 3-Chun-Vasilevsky
150 3.50 0.50 5-Krupp-Holmgren vs 4-Hamilton-Houtkooper
100 1.50 2.50 3-Caplan-Lotief vs 5-Poh-Fisher
100 1.50 2.50 4-Frawley-Vasilevsky vs 2-Baltz-Cooper
90 0.00 4.00 1-Mikkelson-Hancock vs 1-Fleckner-Fleckner
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
400 4.00 0.00 4-Frawley-Vasilevsky vs 1-Fleckner-Fleckner
100 2.50 1.50 2-Harrigan-Quintero vs 2-Baltz-Cooper
100 2.50 1.50 5-Krupp-Holmgren vs 3-Chun-Vasilevsky
100 1.00 3.00 1-Mikkelson-Hancock vs 5-Poh-Fisher
170 0.00 4.00 3-Caplan-Lotief vs 4-Hamilton-Houtkooper
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
150 4.00 0.00 1-Mikkelson-Hancock vs 5-Poh-Fisher
120 3.00 1.00 3-Caplan-Lotief vs 4-Hamilton-Houtkooper
110 2.00 2.00 4-Frawley-Vasilevsky vs 1-Fleckner-Fleckner
90 0.50 3.50 2-Harrigan-Quintero vs 2-Baltz-Cooper
90 0.50 3.50 5-Krupp-Holmgren vs 3-Chun-Vasilevsky
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
90 4.00 0.00 4-Frawley-Vasilevsky vs 1-Fleckner-Fleckner
100 3.00 1.00 1-Mikkelson-Hancock vs 5-Poh-Fisher
150 1.50 2.50 2-Harrigan-Quintero vs 2-Baltz-Cooper
150 1.50 2.50 5-Krupp-Holmgren vs 3-Chun-Vasilevsky
200 0.00 4.00 3-Caplan-Lotief vs 4-Hamilton-Houtkooper
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
100 4.00 0.00 1-Mikkelson-Hancock vs 5-Poh-Fisher
80 3.00 1.00 4-Frawley-Vasilevsky vs 1-Fleckner-Fleckner
140 1.50 2.50 2-Harrigan-Quintero vs 2-Baltz-Cooper
140 1.50 2.50 3-Caplan-Lotief vs 4-Hamilton-Houtkooper
650 0.00 4.00 5-Krupp-Holmgren vs 3-Chun-Vasilevsky
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
650 4.00 0.00 2-Harrigan-Quintero vs 2-Baltz-Cooper
680 1.50 2.50 1-Mikkelson-Hancock vs 5-Poh-Fisher
680 1.50 2.50 3-Caplan-Lotief vs 4-Hamilton-Houtkooper
680 1.50 2.50 4-Frawley-Vasilevsky vs 1-Fleckner-Fleckner
680 1.50 2.50 5-Krupp-Holmgren vs 3-Chun-Vasilevsky
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
50 4.00 0.00 1-Mikkelson-Hancock vs 4-Hamilton-Houtkooper
400 3.00 1.00 4-Frawley-Vasilevsky vs 5-Poh-Fisher
420 2.00 2.00 2-Harrigan-Quintero vs 1-Fleckner-Fleckner
430 1.00 3.00 3-Caplan-Lotief vs 3-Chun-Vasilevsky
450 0.00 4.00 5-Krupp-Holmgren vs 2-Baltz-Cooper
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
100 3.50 0.50 3-Caplan-Lotief vs 3-Chun-Vasilevsky
100 3.50 0.50 4-Frawley-Vasilevsky vs 5-Poh-Fisher
50 2.00 2.00 5-Krupp-Holmgren vs 2-Baltz-Cooper
150 1.00 3.00 2-Harrigan-Quintero vs 1-Fleckner-Fleckner
400 0.00 4.00 1-Mikkelson-Hancock vs 4-Hamilton-Houtkooper
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
90 3.50 0.50 1-Mikkelson-Hancock vs 4-Hamilton-Houtkooper
90 3.50 0.50 4-Frawley-Vasilevsky vs 5-Poh-Fisher
100 1.00 3.00 2-Harrigan-Quintero vs 1-Fleckner-Fleckner
100 1.00 3.00 3-Caplan-Lotief vs 3-Chun-Vasilevsky
100 1.00 3.00 5-Krupp-Holmgren vs 2-Baltz-Cooper
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
120 4.00 0.00 2-Harrigan-Quintero vs 1-Fleckner-Fleckner
130 2.50 1.50 1-Mikkelson-Hancock vs 4-Hamilton-Houtkooper
130 2.50 1.50 4-Frawley-Vasilevsky vs 5-Poh-Fisher
140 1.00 3.00 3-Caplan-Lotief vs 3-Chun-Vasilevsky
480 0.00 4.00 5-Krupp-Holmgren vs 2-Baltz-Cooper
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
90 4.00 0.00 1-Mikkelson-Hancock vs 4-Hamilton-Houtkooper
110 2.50 1.50 3-Caplan-Lotief vs 3-Chun-Vasilevsky
110 2.50 1.50 5-Krupp-Holmgren vs 2-Baltz-Cooper
230 1.00 3.00 4-Frawley-Vasilevsky vs 5-Poh-Fisher
460 0.00 4.00 2-Harrigan-Quintero vs 1-Fleckner-Fleckner
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
200 4.00 0.00 4-Frawley-Vasilevsky vs 4-Hamilton-Houtkooper
650 1.50 2.50 1-Mikkelson-Hancock vs 3-Chun-Vasilevsky
650 1.50 2.50 2-Harrigan-Quintero vs 5-Poh-Fisher
650 1.50 2.50 3-Caplan-Lotief vs 2-Baltz-Cooper
650 1.50 2.50 5-Krupp-Holmgren vs 1-Fleckner-Fleckner
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
50 3.50 0.50 2-Harrigan-Quintero vs 5-Poh-Fisher
50 3.50 0.50 5-Krupp-Holmgren vs 1-Fleckner-Fleckner
430 1.50 2.50 3-Caplan-Lotief vs 2-Baltz-Cooper
430 1.50 2.50 4-Frawley-Vasilevsky vs 4-Hamilton-Houtkooper
460 0.00 4.00 1-Mikkelson-Hancock vs 3-Chun-Vasilevsky
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
620 4.00 0.00 3-Caplan-Lotief vs 2-Baltz-Cooper
250 3.00 1.00 4-Frawley-Vasilevsky vs 4-Hamilton-Houtkooper
170 2.00 2.00 2-Harrigan-Quintero vs 5-Poh-Fisher
140 1.00 3.00 5-Krupp-Holmgren vs 1-Fleckner-Fleckner
50 0.00 4.00 1-Mikkelson-Hancock vs 3-Chun-Vasilevsky
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
600 3.50 0.50 3-Caplan-Lotief vs 2-Baltz-Cooper
600 3.50 0.50 4-Frawley-Vasilevsky vs 4-Hamilton-Houtkooper
630 2.00 2.00 1-Mikkelson-Hancock vs 3-Chun-Vasilevsky
690 0.50 3.50 2-Harrigan-Quintero vs 5-Poh-Fisher
690 0.50 3.50 5-Krupp-Holmgren vs 1-Fleckner-Fleckner
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
110 4.00 0.00 3-Caplan-Lotief vs 2-Baltz-Cooper
100 3.00 1.00 5-Krupp-Holmgren vs 1-Fleckner-Fleckner
PASS 2.00 2.00 1-Mikkelson-Hancock vs 3-Chun-Vasilevsky
140 1.00 3.00 2-Harrigan-Quintero vs 5-Poh-Fisher
170 0.00 4.00 4-Frawley-Vasilevsky vs 4-Hamilton-Houtkooper
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
170 4.00 0.00 2-Harrigan-Quintero vs 4-Hamilton-Houtkooper
110 3.00 1.00 3-Caplan-Lotief vs 1-Fleckner-Fleckner
100 1.00 3.00 1-Mikkelson-Hancock vs 2-Baltz-Cooper
100 1.00 3.00 4-Frawley-Vasilevsky vs 3-Chun-Vasilevsky
100 1.00 3.00 5-Krupp-Holmgren vs 5-Poh-Fisher
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
200 4.00 0.00 5-Krupp-Holmgren vs 5-Poh-Fisher
100 3.00 1.00 2-Harrigan-Quintero vs 4-Hamilton-Houtkooper
90 1.50 2.50 3-Caplan-Lotief vs 1-Fleckner-Fleckner
90 1.50 2.50 4-Frawley-Vasilevsky vs 3-Chun-Vasilevsky
50 0.00 4.00 1-Mikkelson-Hancock vs 2-Baltz-Cooper
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
500 4.00 0.00 2-Harrigan-Quintero vs 4-Hamilton-Houtkooper
200 2.50 1.50 4-Frawley-Vasilevsky vs 3-Chun-Vasilevsky
200 2.50 1.50 5-Krupp-Holmgren vs 5-Poh-Fisher
170 1.00 3.00 3-Caplan-Lotief vs 1-Fleckner-Fleckner
150 0.00 4.00 1-Mikkelson-Hancock vs 2-Baltz-Cooper
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
50 3.50 0.50 1-Mikkelson-Hancock vs 2-Baltz-Cooper
50 3.50 0.50 3-Caplan-Lotief vs 1-Fleckner-Fleckner
400 2.00 2.00 2-Harrigan-Quintero vs 4-Hamilton-Houtkooper
430 1.00 3.00 5-Krupp-Holmgren vs 5-Poh-Fisher
450 0.00 4.00 4-Frawley-Vasilevsky vs 3-Chun-Vasilevsky
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
200 4.00 0.00 4-Frawley-Vasilevsky vs 3-Chun-Vasilevsky
80 3.00 1.00 3-Caplan-Lotief vs 1-Fleckner-Fleckner
110 1.00 3.00 1-Mikkelson-Hancock vs 2-Baltz-Cooper
110 1.00 3.00 2-Harrigan-Quintero vs 4-Hamilton-Houtkooper
110 1.00 3.00 5-Krupp-Holmgren vs 5-Poh-Fisher
|