|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
140 4.00 0.00 2-Quintero-Fineberg vs 3-Poh-Fisher
110 2.50 1.50 3-Chun-Sulerud vs 5-Krupp-Bernard
110 2.50 1.50 5-Geil-Vasilevsky vs 4-Hancock-Mikkelson
110 1.00 3.00 4-Caplan-Thomas vs 2-Cooper-Rogots
500 0.00 4.00 1-Willis-Vasilevsky vs 1-Dunkley-Graese
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
140 4.00 0.00 4-Caplan-Thomas vs 2-Cooper-Rogots
100 2.00 2.00 2-Quintero-Fineberg vs 3-Poh-Fisher
100 2.00 2.00 3-Chun-Sulerud vs 5-Krupp-Bernard
100 2.00 2.00 5-Geil-Vasilevsky vs 4-Hancock-Mikkelson
200 0.00 4.00 1-Willis-Vasilevsky vs 1-Dunkley-Graese
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
100 4.00 0.00 1-Willis-Vasilevsky vs 1-Dunkley-Graese
130 2.00 2.00 2-Quintero-Fineberg vs 3-Poh-Fisher
130 2.00 2.00 3-Chun-Sulerud vs 5-Krupp-Bernard
130 2.00 2.00 5-Geil-Vasilevsky vs 4-Hancock-Mikkelson
150 0.00 4.00 4-Caplan-Thomas vs 2-Cooper-Rogots
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
200 3.50 0.50 2-Quintero-Fineberg vs 3-Poh-Fisher
200 3.50 0.50 4-Caplan-Thomas vs 2-Cooper-Rogots
170 2.00 2.00 3-Chun-Sulerud vs 5-Krupp-Bernard
100 0.50 3.50 1-Willis-Vasilevsky vs 1-Dunkley-Graese
100 0.50 3.50 5-Geil-Vasilevsky vs 4-Hancock-Mikkelson
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
110 4.00 0.00 2-Quintero-Fineberg vs 3-Poh-Fisher
50 2.50 1.50 3-Chun-Sulerud vs 5-Krupp-Bernard
50 2.50 1.50 4-Caplan-Thomas vs 2-Cooper-Rogots
90 1.00 3.00 5-Geil-Vasilevsky vs 4-Hancock-Mikkelson
100 0.00 4.00 1-Willis-Vasilevsky vs 1-Dunkley-Graese
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
110 3.50 0.50 2-Quintero-Fineberg vs 2-Cooper-Rogots
110 3.50 0.50 5-Geil-Vasilevsky vs 3-Poh-Fisher
120 1.50 2.50 3-Chun-Sulerud vs 4-Hancock-Mikkelson
120 1.50 2.50 4-Caplan-Thomas vs 1-Dunkley-Graese
140 0.00 4.00 1-Willis-Vasilevsky vs 5-Krupp-Bernard
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
600 3.50 0.50 1-Willis-Vasilevsky vs 5-Krupp-Bernard
600 3.50 0.50 5-Geil-Vasilevsky vs 3-Poh-Fisher
630 2.00 2.00 3-Chun-Sulerud vs 4-Hancock-Mikkelson
660 0.50 3.50 2-Quintero-Fineberg vs 2-Cooper-Rogots
660 0.50 3.50 4-Caplan-Thomas vs 1-Dunkley-Graese
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
50 4.00 0.00 2-Quintero-Fineberg vs 2-Cooper-Rogots
150 3.00 1.00 1-Willis-Vasilevsky vs 5-Krupp-Bernard
420 2.00 2.00 5-Geil-Vasilevsky vs 3-Poh-Fisher
450 1.00 3.00 3-Chun-Sulerud vs 4-Hancock-Mikkelson
1210 0.00 4.00 4-Caplan-Thomas vs 1-Dunkley-Graese
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
100 3.50 0.50 3-Chun-Sulerud vs 4-Hancock-Mikkelson
100 3.50 0.50 5-Geil-Vasilevsky vs 3-Poh-Fisher
300 2.00 2.00 1-Willis-Vasilevsky vs 5-Krupp-Bernard
720 1.00 3.00 2-Quintero-Fineberg vs 2-Cooper-Rogots
1440 0.00 4.00 4-Caplan-Thomas vs 1-Dunkley-Graese
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
300 4.00 0.00 2-Quintero-Fineberg vs 2-Cooper-Rogots
100 2.50 1.50 3-Chun-Sulerud vs 4-Hancock-Mikkelson
100 2.50 1.50 4-Caplan-Thomas vs 1-Dunkley-Graese
100 1.00 3.00 1-Willis-Vasilevsky vs 5-Krupp-Bernard
600 0.00 4.00 5-Geil-Vasilevsky vs 3-Poh-Fisher
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
110 4.00 0.00 1-Willis-Vasilevsky vs 4-Hancock-Mikkelson
50 2.50 1.50 2-Quintero-Fineberg vs 1-Dunkley-Graese
50 2.50 1.50 4-Caplan-Thomas vs 5-Krupp-Bernard
100 0.50 3.50 3-Chun-Sulerud vs 3-Poh-Fisher
100 0.50 3.50 5-Geil-Vasilevsky vs 2-Cooper-Rogots
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
50 4.00 0.00 2-Quintero-Fineberg vs 1-Dunkley-Graese
90 3.00 1.00 3-Chun-Sulerud vs 3-Poh-Fisher
100 2.00 2.00 4-Caplan-Thomas vs 5-Krupp-Bernard
140 1.00 3.00 5-Geil-Vasilevsky vs 2-Cooper-Rogots
470 0.00 4.00 1-Willis-Vasilevsky vs 4-Hancock-Mikkelson
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
100 4.00 0.00 1-Willis-Vasilevsky vs 4-Hancock-Mikkelson
210 3.00 1.00 4-Caplan-Thomas vs 5-Krupp-Bernard
620 2.00 2.00 5-Geil-Vasilevsky vs 2-Cooper-Rogots
660 0.50 3.50 2-Quintero-Fineberg vs 1-Dunkley-Graese
660 0.50 3.50 3-Chun-Sulerud vs 3-Poh-Fisher
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
430 4.00 0.00 1-Willis-Vasilevsky vs 4-Hancock-Mikkelson
100 3.00 1.00 5-Geil-Vasilevsky vs 2-Cooper-Rogots
50 1.50 2.50 2-Quintero-Fineberg vs 1-Dunkley-Graese
50 1.50 2.50 4-Caplan-Thomas vs 5-Krupp-Bernard
100 0.00 4.00 3-Chun-Sulerud vs 3-Poh-Fisher
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
200 4.00 0.00 2-Quintero-Fineberg vs 1-Dunkley-Graese
420 3.00 1.00 3-Chun-Sulerud vs 3-Poh-Fisher
450 1.50 2.50 1-Willis-Vasilevsky vs 4-Hancock-Mikkelson
450 1.50 2.50 5-Geil-Vasilevsky vs 2-Cooper-Rogots
480 0.00 4.00 4-Caplan-Thomas vs 5-Krupp-Bernard
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
100 3.50 0.50 1-Willis-Vasilevsky vs 3-Poh-Fisher
100 3.50 0.50 2-Quintero-Fineberg vs 5-Krupp-Bernard
120 1.50 2.50 3-Chun-Sulerud vs 2-Cooper-Rogots
120 1.50 2.50 4-Caplan-Thomas vs 4-Hancock-Mikkelson
170 0.00 4.00 5-Geil-Vasilevsky vs 1-Dunkley-Graese
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
50 3.50 0.50 2-Quintero-Fineberg vs 5-Krupp-Bernard
50 3.50 0.50 3-Chun-Sulerud vs 2-Cooper-Rogots
130 2.00 2.00 4-Caplan-Thomas vs 4-Hancock-Mikkelson
200 1.00 3.00 1-Willis-Vasilevsky vs 3-Poh-Fisher
420 0.00 4.00 5-Geil-Vasilevsky vs 1-Dunkley-Graese
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
100 4.00 0.00 1-Willis-Vasilevsky vs 3-Poh-Fisher
50 2.50 1.50 2-Quintero-Fineberg vs 5-Krupp-Bernard
50 2.50 1.50 5-Geil-Vasilevsky vs 1-Dunkley-Graese
110 1.00 3.00 4-Caplan-Thomas vs 4-Hancock-Mikkelson
120 0.00 4.00 3-Chun-Sulerud vs 2-Cooper-Rogots
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
90 4.00 0.00 2-Quintero-Fineberg vs 5-Krupp-Bernard
100 3.00 1.00 1-Willis-Vasilevsky vs 3-Poh-Fisher
120 2.00 2.00 3-Chun-Sulerud vs 2-Cooper-Rogots
140 1.00 3.00 5-Geil-Vasilevsky vs 1-Dunkley-Graese
150 0.00 4.00 4-Caplan-Thomas vs 4-Hancock-Mikkelson
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
200 3.50 0.50 1-Willis-Vasilevsky vs 3-Poh-Fisher
200 3.50 0.50 3-Chun-Sulerud vs 2-Cooper-Rogots
100 2.00 2.00 2-Quintero-Fineberg vs 5-Krupp-Bernard
140 1.00 3.00 5-Geil-Vasilevsky vs 1-Dunkley-Graese
170 0.00 4.00 4-Caplan-Thomas vs 4-Hancock-Mikkelson
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
300 4.00 0.00 4-Caplan-Thomas vs 3-Poh-Fisher
100 3.00 1.00 2-Quintero-Fineberg vs 4-Hancock-Mikkelson
140 2.00 2.00 5-Geil-Vasilevsky vs 5-Krupp-Bernard
200 1.00 3.00 3-Chun-Sulerud vs 1-Dunkley-Graese
400 0.00 4.00 1-Willis-Vasilevsky vs 2-Cooper-Rogots
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
120 4.00 0.00 5-Geil-Vasilevsky vs 5-Krupp-Bernard
600 3.00 1.00 4-Caplan-Thomas vs 3-Poh-Fisher
630 1.50 2.50 1-Willis-Vasilevsky vs 2-Cooper-Rogots
630 1.50 2.50 2-Quintero-Fineberg vs 4-Hancock-Mikkelson
660 0.00 4.00 3-Chun-Sulerud vs 1-Dunkley-Graese
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
100 3.00 1.00 3-Chun-Sulerud vs 1-Dunkley-Graese
100 3.00 1.00 4-Caplan-Thomas vs 3-Poh-Fisher
100 3.00 1.00 5-Geil-Vasilevsky vs 5-Krupp-Bernard
200 1.00 3.00 1-Willis-Vasilevsky vs 2-Cooper-Rogots
620 0.00 4.00 2-Quintero-Fineberg vs 4-Hancock-Mikkelson
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
140 4.00 0.00 3-Chun-Sulerud vs 1-Dunkley-Graese
50 2.00 2.00 2-Quintero-Fineberg vs 4-Hancock-Mikkelson
50 2.00 2.00 4-Caplan-Thomas vs 3-Poh-Fisher
50 2.00 2.00 5-Geil-Vasilevsky vs 5-Krupp-Bernard
110 0.00 4.00 1-Willis-Vasilevsky vs 2-Cooper-Rogots
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
1010 4.00 0.00 3-Chun-Sulerud vs 1-Dunkley-Graese
510 2.50 1.50 2-Quintero-Fineberg vs 4-Hancock-Mikkelson
510 2.50 1.50 5-Geil-Vasilevsky vs 5-Krupp-Bernard
50 1.00 3.00 4-Caplan-Thomas vs 3-Poh-Fisher
150 0.00 4.00 1-Willis-Vasilevsky vs 2-Cooper-Rogots
|