|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
490 1.00 0.00 4-Mikkelson-Hancock vs 2-Farrell-Farrell
170 0.00 1.00 5-Quintero-Vasilevsky vs 3-Cooper-Rogots
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
150 1.00 0.00 5-Quintero-Vasilevsky vs 3-Cooper-Rogots
110 0.00 1.00 4-Mikkelson-Hancock vs 2-Farrell-Farrell
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
620 1.00 0.00 5-Quintero-Vasilevsky vs 3-Cooper-Rogots
650 0.00 1.00 4-Mikkelson-Hancock vs 2-Farrell-Farrell
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
620 1.00 0.00 4-Mikkelson-Hancock vs 2-Farrell-Farrell
170 0.00 1.00 5-Quintero-Vasilevsky vs 3-Cooper-Rogots
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
620 1.00 0.00 4-Mikkelson-Hancock vs 2-Farrell-Farrell
300 0.00 1.00 5-Quintero-Vasilevsky vs 3-Cooper-Rogots
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
420 1.00 0.00 4-Mikkelson-Hancock vs 3-Cooper-Rogots
50 0.00 1.00 6-Caplan-Vasilevsky vs 2-Farrell-Farrell
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
200 1.00 0.00 6-Caplan-Vasilevsky vs 2-Farrell-Farrell
100 0.00 1.00 4-Mikkelson-Hancock vs 3-Cooper-Rogots
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
980 1.00 0.00 6-Caplan-Vasilevsky vs 2-Farrell-Farrell
480 0.00 1.00 4-Mikkelson-Hancock vs 3-Cooper-Rogots
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
140 0.50 0.50 4-Mikkelson-Hancock vs 3-Cooper-Rogots
140 0.50 0.50 6-Caplan-Vasilevsky vs 2-Farrell-Farrell
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
200 1.00 0.00 4-Mikkelson-Hancock vs 3-Cooper-Rogots
170 0.00 1.00 6-Caplan-Vasilevsky vs 2-Farrell-Farrell
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
420 1.00 0.00 6-Caplan-Vasilevsky vs 3-Cooper-Rogots
50 0.00 1.00 5-Quintero-Vasilevsky vs 4-Mikkelson-Hancock
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
110 1.00 0.00 6-Caplan-Vasilevsky vs 3-Cooper-Rogots
140 0.00 1.00 5-Quintero-Vasilevsky vs 4-Mikkelson-Hancock
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
100 1.00 0.00 5-Quintero-Vasilevsky vs 4-Mikkelson-Hancock
100 0.00 1.00 6-Caplan-Vasilevsky vs 3-Cooper-Rogots
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
50 1.00 0.00 5-Quintero-Vasilevsky vs 4-Mikkelson-Hancock
140 0.00 1.00 6-Caplan-Vasilevsky vs 3-Cooper-Rogots
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
150 1.00 0.00 5-Quintero-Vasilevsky vs 4-Mikkelson-Hancock
510 0.00 1.00 6-Caplan-Vasilevsky vs 3-Cooper-Rogots
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
460 1.00 0.00 6-Caplan-Vasilevsky vs 4-Mikkelson-Hancock
50 0.00 1.00 2-Farrell-Farrell vs 5-Quintero-Vasilevsky
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
140 1.00 0.00 6-Caplan-Vasilevsky vs 4-Mikkelson-Hancock
150 0.00 1.00 2-Farrell-Farrell vs 5-Quintero-Vasilevsky
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
480 1.00 0.00 6-Caplan-Vasilevsky vs 4-Mikkelson-Hancock
1010 0.00 1.00 2-Farrell-Farrell vs 5-Quintero-Vasilevsky
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
100 1.00 0.00 6-Caplan-Vasilevsky vs 4-Mikkelson-Hancock
150 0.00 1.00 2-Farrell-Farrell vs 5-Quintero-Vasilevsky
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
120 1.00 0.00 2-Farrell-Farrell vs 5-Quintero-Vasilevsky
210 0.00 1.00 6-Caplan-Vasilevsky vs 4-Mikkelson-Hancock
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
500 1.00 0.00 3-Cooper-Rogots vs 2-Farrell-Farrell
690 0.00 1.00 6-Caplan-Vasilevsky vs 5-Quintero-Vasilevsky
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
50 0.50 0.50 3-Cooper-Rogots vs 2-Farrell-Farrell
50 0.50 0.50 6-Caplan-Vasilevsky vs 5-Quintero-Vasilevsky
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
140 1.00 0.00 6-Caplan-Vasilevsky vs 5-Quintero-Vasilevsky
300 0.00 1.00 3-Cooper-Rogots vs 2-Farrell-Farrell
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
130 1.00 0.00 6-Caplan-Vasilevsky vs 5-Quintero-Vasilevsky
170 0.00 1.00 3-Cooper-Rogots vs 2-Farrell-Farrell
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
170 1.00 0.00 3-Cooper-Rogots vs 2-Farrell-Farrell
620 0.00 1.00 6-Caplan-Vasilevsky vs 5-Quintero-Vasilevsky
|