|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
170 3.50 0.50 1-Lotief-Contarsy vs 1-Graese-Dunkley
170 3.50 0.50 3-Caplan-Vasilevsky vs 5-Mikkelson-Hancock
420 1.00 3.00 2-Quintero-Fineberg vs 3-Chun-Sulerud
420 1.00 3.00 4-Huff-Carson vs 2-Cooper-Rogots
420 1.00 3.00 5-Holmgren-Krupp vs 4-Poh-Fisher
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
200 3.00 1.00 2-Quintero-Fineberg vs 3-Chun-Sulerud
200 3.00 1.00 3-Caplan-Vasilevsky vs 5-Mikkelson-Hancock
200 3.00 1.00 4-Huff-Carson vs 2-Cooper-Rogots
100 1.00 3.00 1-Lotief-Contarsy vs 1-Graese-Dunkley
200 0.00 4.00 5-Holmgren-Krupp vs 4-Poh-Fisher
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
100 4.00 0.00 3-Caplan-Vasilevsky vs 5-Mikkelson-Hancock
660 3.00 1.00 2-Quintero-Fineberg vs 3-Chun-Sulerud
690 1.50 2.50 4-Huff-Carson vs 2-Cooper-Rogots
690 1.50 2.50 5-Holmgren-Krupp vs 4-Poh-Fisher
720 0.00 4.00 1-Lotief-Contarsy vs 1-Graese-Dunkley
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
170 4.00 0.00 4-Huff-Carson vs 2-Cooper-Rogots
150 2.50 1.50 1-Lotief-Contarsy vs 1-Graese-Dunkley
150 2.50 1.50 5-Holmgren-Krupp vs 4-Poh-Fisher
130 1.00 3.00 2-Quintero-Fineberg vs 3-Chun-Sulerud
500 0.00 4.00 3-Caplan-Vasilevsky vs 5-Mikkelson-Hancock
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
630 3.00 1.00 1-Lotief-Contarsy vs 1-Graese-Dunkley
630 3.00 1.00 2-Quintero-Fineberg vs 3-Chun-Sulerud
630 3.00 1.00 3-Caplan-Vasilevsky vs 5-Mikkelson-Hancock
600 0.50 3.50 4-Huff-Carson vs 2-Cooper-Rogots
600 0.50 3.50 5-Holmgren-Krupp vs 4-Poh-Fisher
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
300 4.00 0.00 3-Caplan-Vasilevsky vs 4-Poh-Fisher
110 2.50 1.50 2-Quintero-Fineberg vs 2-Cooper-Rogots
110 2.50 1.50 4-Huff-Carson vs 1-Graese-Dunkley
100 1.00 3.00 1-Lotief-Contarsy vs 5-Mikkelson-Hancock
90 0.00 4.00 5-Holmgren-Krupp vs 3-Chun-Sulerud
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
200 4.00 0.00 3-Caplan-Vasilevsky vs 4-Poh-Fisher
120 3.00 1.00 2-Quintero-Fineberg vs 2-Cooper-Rogots
600 1.00 3.00 1-Lotief-Contarsy vs 5-Mikkelson-Hancock
600 1.00 3.00 4-Huff-Carson vs 1-Graese-Dunkley
600 1.00 3.00 5-Holmgren-Krupp vs 3-Chun-Sulerud
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
420 2.50 1.50 2-Quintero-Fineberg vs 2-Cooper-Rogots
420 2.50 1.50 3-Caplan-Vasilevsky vs 4-Poh-Fisher
420 2.50 1.50 4-Huff-Carson vs 1-Graese-Dunkley
420 2.50 1.50 5-Holmgren-Krupp vs 3-Chun-Sulerud
50 0.00 4.00 1-Lotief-Contarsy vs 5-Mikkelson-Hancock
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
130 3.50 0.50 1-Lotief-Contarsy vs 5-Mikkelson-Hancock
130 3.50 0.50 5-Holmgren-Krupp vs 3-Chun-Sulerud
150 1.00 3.00 2-Quintero-Fineberg vs 2-Cooper-Rogots
150 1.00 3.00 3-Caplan-Vasilevsky vs 4-Poh-Fisher
150 1.00 3.00 4-Huff-Carson vs 1-Graese-Dunkley
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
120 4.00 0.00 2-Quintero-Fineberg vs 2-Cooper-Rogots
110 3.00 1.00 1-Lotief-Contarsy vs 5-Mikkelson-Hancock
90 2.00 2.00 4-Huff-Carson vs 1-Graese-Dunkley
200 0.50 3.50 3-Caplan-Vasilevsky vs 4-Poh-Fisher
200 0.50 3.50 5-Holmgren-Krupp vs 3-Chun-Sulerud
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
980 4.00 0.00 4-Huff-Carson vs 5-Mikkelson-Hancock
480 2.50 1.50 2-Quintero-Fineberg vs 1-Graese-Dunkley
480 2.50 1.50 3-Caplan-Vasilevsky vs 3-Chun-Sulerud
460 1.00 3.00 5-Holmgren-Krupp vs 2-Cooper-Rogots
430 0.00 4.00 1-Lotief-Contarsy vs 4-Poh-Fisher
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
650 4.00 0.00 1-Lotief-Contarsy vs 4-Poh-Fisher
170 3.00 1.00 5-Holmgren-Krupp vs 2-Cooper-Rogots
140 1.50 2.50 2-Quintero-Fineberg vs 1-Graese-Dunkley
140 1.50 2.50 3-Caplan-Vasilevsky vs 3-Chun-Sulerud
100 0.00 4.00 4-Huff-Carson vs 5-Mikkelson-Hancock
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
100 3.50 0.50 2-Quintero-Fineberg vs 1-Graese-Dunkley
100 3.50 0.50 5-Holmgren-Krupp vs 2-Cooper-Rogots
660 1.00 3.00 1-Lotief-Contarsy vs 4-Poh-Fisher
660 1.00 3.00 3-Caplan-Vasilevsky vs 3-Chun-Sulerud
660 1.00 3.00 4-Huff-Carson vs 5-Mikkelson-Hancock
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
300 4.00 0.00 1-Lotief-Contarsy vs 4-Poh-Fisher
50 3.00 1.00 5-Holmgren-Krupp vs 2-Cooper-Rogots
50 1.50 2.50 3-Caplan-Vasilevsky vs 3-Chun-Sulerud
50 1.50 2.50 4-Huff-Carson vs 5-Mikkelson-Hancock
300 0.00 4.00 2-Quintero-Fineberg vs 1-Graese-Dunkley
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
50 3.00 1.00 2-Quintero-Fineberg vs 1-Graese-Dunkley
50 3.00 1.00 4-Huff-Carson vs 5-Mikkelson-Hancock
50 3.00 1.00 5-Holmgren-Krupp vs 2-Cooper-Rogots
200 1.00 3.00 3-Caplan-Vasilevsky vs 3-Chun-Sulerud
450 0.00 4.00 1-Lotief-Contarsy vs 4-Poh-Fisher
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
200 4.00 0.00 3-Caplan-Vasilevsky vs 2-Cooper-Rogots
50 3.00 1.00 1-Lotief-Contarsy vs 3-Chun-Sulerud
120 2.00 2.00 5-Holmgren-Krupp vs 1-Graese-Dunkley
140 0.50 3.50 2-Quintero-Fineberg vs 5-Mikkelson-Hancock
140 0.50 3.50 4-Huff-Carson vs 4-Poh-Fisher
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
420 2.50 1.50 1-Lotief-Contarsy vs 3-Chun-Sulerud
420 2.50 1.50 3-Caplan-Vasilevsky vs 2-Cooper-Rogots
420 2.50 1.50 4-Huff-Carson vs 4-Poh-Fisher
420 2.50 1.50 5-Holmgren-Krupp vs 1-Graese-Dunkley
480 0.00 4.00 2-Quintero-Fineberg vs 5-Mikkelson-Hancock
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
620 4.00 0.00 5-Holmgren-Krupp vs 1-Graese-Dunkley
600 3.00 1.00 3-Caplan-Vasilevsky vs 2-Cooper-Rogots
110 2.00 2.00 4-Huff-Carson vs 4-Poh-Fisher
100 1.00 3.00 1-Lotief-Contarsy vs 3-Chun-Sulerud
200 0.00 4.00 2-Quintero-Fineberg vs 5-Mikkelson-Hancock
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
480 3.50 0.50 3-Caplan-Vasilevsky vs 2-Cooper-Rogots
480 3.50 0.50 5-Holmgren-Krupp vs 1-Graese-Dunkley
450 1.50 2.50 1-Lotief-Contarsy vs 3-Chun-Sulerud
450 1.50 2.50 4-Huff-Carson vs 4-Poh-Fisher
230 0.00 4.00 2-Quintero-Fineberg vs 5-Mikkelson-Hancock
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
630 4.00 0.00 3-Caplan-Vasilevsky vs 2-Cooper-Rogots
660 3.00 1.00 2-Quintero-Fineberg vs 5-Mikkelson-Hancock
690 1.00 3.00 1-Lotief-Contarsy vs 3-Chun-Sulerud
690 1.00 3.00 4-Huff-Carson vs 4-Poh-Fisher
690 1.00 3.00 5-Holmgren-Krupp vs 1-Graese-Dunkley
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
50 4.00 0.00 1-Lotief-Contarsy vs 2-Cooper-Rogots
100 3.00 1.00 4-Huff-Carson vs 3-Chun-Sulerud
140 1.50 2.50 2-Quintero-Fineberg vs 4-Poh-Fisher
140 1.50 2.50 5-Holmgren-Krupp vs 5-Mikkelson-Hancock
300 0.00 4.00 3-Caplan-Vasilevsky vs 1-Graese-Dunkley
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
170 3.50 0.50 3-Caplan-Vasilevsky vs 1-Graese-Dunkley
170 3.50 0.50 4-Huff-Carson vs 3-Chun-Sulerud
250 2.00 2.00 1-Lotief-Contarsy vs 2-Cooper-Rogots
500 0.50 3.50 2-Quintero-Fineberg vs 4-Poh-Fisher
500 0.50 3.50 5-Holmgren-Krupp vs 5-Mikkelson-Hancock
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
150 4.00 0.00 3-Caplan-Vasilevsky vs 1-Graese-Dunkley
120 3.00 1.00 1-Lotief-Contarsy vs 2-Cooper-Rogots
140 1.00 3.00 2-Quintero-Fineberg vs 4-Poh-Fisher
140 1.00 3.00 4-Huff-Carson vs 3-Chun-Sulerud
140 1.00 3.00 5-Holmgren-Krupp vs 5-Mikkelson-Hancock
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
110 3.50 0.50 1-Lotief-Contarsy vs 2-Cooper-Rogots
110 3.50 0.50 2-Quintero-Fineberg vs 4-Poh-Fisher
100 1.50 2.50 3-Caplan-Vasilevsky vs 1-Graese-Dunkley
100 1.50 2.50 5-Holmgren-Krupp vs 5-Mikkelson-Hancock
50 0.00 4.00 4-Huff-Carson vs 3-Chun-Sulerud
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
200 3.00 1.00 1-Lotief-Contarsy vs 2-Cooper-Rogots
200 3.00 1.00 2-Quintero-Fineberg vs 4-Poh-Fisher
200 3.00 1.00 4-Huff-Carson vs 3-Chun-Sulerud
110 0.50 3.50 3-Caplan-Vasilevsky vs 1-Graese-Dunkley
110 0.50 3.50 5-Holmgren-Krupp vs 5-Mikkelson-Hancock
|