|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
130 1.50 0.50 5-Harrigan-Poh vs 3-Kavall-Vasilevsky
130 1.50 0.50 6-Rogots-Vasilevsky vs 1-Lotief-Fineberg
50 0.00 2.00 4-Mikkelson-Hancock vs 2-Holmgren-Krupp
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
50 1.50 0.50 4-Mikkelson-Hancock vs 2-Holmgren-Krupp
50 1.50 0.50 6-Rogots-Vasilevsky vs 1-Lotief-Fineberg
140 0.00 2.00 5-Harrigan-Poh vs 3-Kavall-Vasilevsky
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
90 2.00 0.00 4-Mikkelson-Hancock vs 2-Holmgren-Krupp
50 1.00 1.00 6-Rogots-Vasilevsky vs 1-Lotief-Fineberg
140 0.00 2.00 5-Harrigan-Poh vs 3-Kavall-Vasilevsky
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
660 2.00 0.00 6-Rogots-Vasilevsky vs 1-Lotief-Fineberg
690 1.00 1.00 4-Mikkelson-Hancock vs 2-Holmgren-Krupp
720 0.00 2.00 5-Harrigan-Poh vs 3-Kavall-Vasilevsky
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
630 2.00 0.00 5-Harrigan-Poh vs 3-Kavall-Vasilevsky
200 0.50 1.50 4-Mikkelson-Hancock vs 2-Holmgren-Krupp
200 0.50 1.50 6-Rogots-Vasilevsky vs 1-Lotief-Fineberg
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
300 2.00 0.00 1-Lotief-Fineberg vs 5-Harrigan-Poh
650 0.50 1.50 4-Mikkelson-Hancock vs 3-Kavall-Vasilevsky
650 0.50 1.50 6-Rogots-Vasilevsky vs 2-Holmgren-Krupp
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
690 2.00 0.00 4-Mikkelson-Hancock vs 3-Kavall-Vasilevsky
1370 1.00 1.00 1-Lotief-Fineberg vs 5-Harrigan-Poh
1470 0.00 2.00 6-Rogots-Vasilevsky vs 2-Holmgren-Krupp
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
50 2.00 0.00 4-Mikkelson-Hancock vs 3-Kavall-Vasilevsky
50 1.00 1.00 1-Lotief-Fineberg vs 5-Harrigan-Poh
300 0.00 2.00 6-Rogots-Vasilevsky vs 2-Holmgren-Krupp
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
200 1.50 0.50 1-Lotief-Fineberg vs 5-Harrigan-Poh
200 1.50 0.50 4-Mikkelson-Hancock vs 3-Kavall-Vasilevsky
110 0.00 2.00 6-Rogots-Vasilevsky vs 2-Holmgren-Krupp
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
200 2.00 0.00 4-Mikkelson-Hancock vs 3-Kavall-Vasilevsky
130 0.50 1.50 1-Lotief-Fineberg vs 5-Harrigan-Poh
130 0.50 1.50 6-Rogots-Vasilevsky vs 2-Holmgren-Krupp
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
50 2.00 0.00 6-Rogots-Vasilevsky vs 3-Kavall-Vasilevsky
50 1.00 1.00 5-Harrigan-Poh vs 4-Mikkelson-Hancock
110 0.00 2.00 2-Holmgren-Krupp vs 1-Lotief-Fineberg
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
230 2.00 0.00 6-Rogots-Vasilevsky vs 3-Kavall-Vasilevsky
130 1.00 1.00 2-Holmgren-Krupp vs 1-Lotief-Fineberg
50 0.00 2.00 5-Harrigan-Poh vs 4-Mikkelson-Hancock
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
150 2.00 0.00 5-Harrigan-Poh vs 4-Mikkelson-Hancock
110 1.00 1.00 6-Rogots-Vasilevsky vs 3-Kavall-Vasilevsky
90 0.00 2.00 2-Holmgren-Krupp vs 1-Lotief-Fineberg
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
110 2.00 0.00 2-Holmgren-Krupp vs 1-Lotief-Fineberg
50 1.00 1.00 6-Rogots-Vasilevsky vs 3-Kavall-Vasilevsky
110 0.00 2.00 5-Harrigan-Poh vs 4-Mikkelson-Hancock
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
600 1.50 0.50 5-Harrigan-Poh vs 4-Mikkelson-Hancock
600 1.50 0.50 6-Rogots-Vasilevsky vs 3-Kavall-Vasilevsky
100 0.00 2.00 2-Holmgren-Krupp vs 1-Lotief-Fineberg
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
100 2.00 0.00 2-Holmgren-Krupp vs 5-Harrigan-Poh
620 1.00 1.00 3-Kavall-Vasilevsky vs 1-Lotief-Fineberg
650 0.00 2.00 6-Rogots-Vasilevsky vs 4-Mikkelson-Hancock
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
50 1.50 0.50 2-Holmgren-Krupp vs 5-Harrigan-Poh
50 1.50 0.50 3-Kavall-Vasilevsky vs 1-Lotief-Fineberg
140 0.00 2.00 6-Rogots-Vasilevsky vs 4-Mikkelson-Hancock
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
720 2.00 0.00 3-Kavall-Vasilevsky vs 1-Lotief-Fineberg
640 1.00 1.00 6-Rogots-Vasilevsky vs 4-Mikkelson-Hancock
190 0.00 2.00 2-Holmgren-Krupp vs 5-Harrigan-Poh
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
1460 2.00 0.00 2-Holmgren-Krupp vs 5-Harrigan-Poh
1470 1.00 1.00 6-Rogots-Vasilevsky vs 4-Mikkelson-Hancock
2210 0.00 2.00 3-Kavall-Vasilevsky vs 1-Lotief-Fineberg
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
630 2.00 0.00 6-Rogots-Vasilevsky vs 4-Mikkelson-Hancock
620 1.00 1.00 2-Holmgren-Krupp vs 5-Harrigan-Poh
100 0.00 2.00 3-Kavall-Vasilevsky vs 1-Lotief-Fineberg
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
140 2.00 0.00 3-Kavall-Vasilevsky vs 2-Holmgren-Krupp
420 1.00 1.00 1-Lotief-Fineberg vs 4-Mikkelson-Hancock
430 0.00 2.00 6-Rogots-Vasilevsky vs 5-Harrigan-Poh
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
650 2.00 0.00 1-Lotief-Fineberg vs 4-Mikkelson-Hancock
680 0.50 1.50 3-Kavall-Vasilevsky vs 2-Holmgren-Krupp
680 0.50 1.50 6-Rogots-Vasilevsky vs 5-Harrigan-Poh
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
630 2.00 0.00 3-Kavall-Vasilevsky vs 2-Holmgren-Krupp
100 0.50 1.50 1-Lotief-Fineberg vs 4-Mikkelson-Hancock
100 0.50 1.50 6-Rogots-Vasilevsky vs 5-Harrigan-Poh
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
140 2.00 0.00 3-Kavall-Vasilevsky vs 2-Holmgren-Krupp
170 0.50 1.50 1-Lotief-Fineberg vs 4-Mikkelson-Hancock
170 0.50 1.50 6-Rogots-Vasilevsky vs 5-Harrigan-Poh
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
480 2.00 0.00 3-Kavall-Vasilevsky vs 2-Holmgren-Krupp
450 1.00 1.00 6-Rogots-Vasilevsky vs 5-Harrigan-Poh
50 0.00 2.00 1-Lotief-Fineberg vs 4-Mikkelson-Hancock
|