|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
50 4.00 0.00 2-Caplan-Vasilevsky vs 3-Geil-Geil
130 3.00 1.00 1-Quintero-Vasilevsky vs 1-Cooper-Heberlee
150 2.00 2.00 5-Holmgren-Krupp vs 4-Hancock-Mikkelson
400 1.00 3.00 3-Contarsy-Lotief vs 5-Dahl-Dunkley
430 0.00 4.00 4-Chun-Sulerud vs 2-Harrigan-Fineberg
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
50 3.50 0.50 1-Quintero-Vasilevsky vs 1-Cooper-Heberlee
50 3.50 0.50 5-Holmgren-Krupp vs 4-Hancock-Mikkelson
110 1.50 2.50 2-Caplan-Vasilevsky vs 3-Geil-Geil
110 1.50 2.50 4-Chun-Sulerud vs 2-Harrigan-Fineberg
800 0.00 4.00 3-Contarsy-Lotief vs 5-Dahl-Dunkley
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
520 3.00 1.00 2-Caplan-Vasilevsky vs 3-Geil-Geil
520 3.00 1.00 3-Contarsy-Lotief vs 5-Dahl-Dunkley
520 3.00 1.00 5-Holmgren-Krupp vs 4-Hancock-Mikkelson
460 1.00 3.00 4-Chun-Sulerud vs 2-Harrigan-Fineberg
450 0.00 4.00 1-Quintero-Vasilevsky vs 1-Cooper-Heberlee
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
710 4.00 0.00 3-Contarsy-Lotief vs 5-Dahl-Dunkley
1460 2.50 1.50 4-Chun-Sulerud vs 2-Harrigan-Fineberg
1460 2.50 1.50 5-Holmgren-Krupp vs 4-Hancock-Mikkelson
1470 0.50 3.50 1-Quintero-Vasilevsky vs 1-Cooper-Heberlee
1470 0.50 3.50 2-Caplan-Vasilevsky vs 3-Geil-Geil
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
80 4.00 0.00 2-Caplan-Vasilevsky vs 3-Geil-Geil
50 2.00 2.00 1-Quintero-Vasilevsky vs 1-Cooper-Heberlee
50 2.00 2.00 4-Chun-Sulerud vs 2-Harrigan-Fineberg
50 2.00 2.00 5-Holmgren-Krupp vs 4-Hancock-Mikkelson
PASS 0.00 4.00 3-Contarsy-Lotief vs 5-Dahl-Dunkley
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
120 4.00 0.00 5-Holmgren-Krupp vs 3-Geil-Geil
110 2.00 2.00 2-Caplan-Vasilevsky vs 2-Harrigan-Fineberg
110 2.00 2.00 3-Contarsy-Lotief vs 4-Hancock-Mikkelson
110 2.00 2.00 4-Chun-Sulerud vs 1-Cooper-Heberlee
90 0.00 4.00 1-Quintero-Vasilevsky vs 5-Dahl-Dunkley
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
620 4.00 0.00 3-Contarsy-Lotief vs 4-Hancock-Mikkelson
650 2.00 2.00 1-Quintero-Vasilevsky vs 5-Dahl-Dunkley
650 2.00 2.00 4-Chun-Sulerud vs 1-Cooper-Heberlee
650 2.00 2.00 5-Holmgren-Krupp vs 3-Geil-Geil
680 0.00 4.00 2-Caplan-Vasilevsky vs 2-Harrigan-Fineberg
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
150 4.00 0.00 2-Caplan-Vasilevsky vs 2-Harrigan-Fineberg
100 3.00 1.00 5-Holmgren-Krupp vs 3-Geil-Geil
150 1.00 3.00 1-Quintero-Vasilevsky vs 5-Dahl-Dunkley
150 1.00 3.00 3-Contarsy-Lotief vs 4-Hancock-Mikkelson
150 1.00 3.00 4-Chun-Sulerud vs 1-Cooper-Heberlee
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
100 4.00 0.00 1-Quintero-Vasilevsky vs 5-Dahl-Dunkley
170 2.50 1.50 4-Chun-Sulerud vs 1-Cooper-Heberlee
170 2.50 1.50 5-Holmgren-Krupp vs 3-Geil-Geil
620 0.50 3.50 2-Caplan-Vasilevsky vs 2-Harrigan-Fineberg
620 0.50 3.50 3-Contarsy-Lotief vs 4-Hancock-Mikkelson
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
400 4.00 0.00 4-Chun-Sulerud vs 1-Cooper-Heberlee
130 2.50 1.50 3-Contarsy-Lotief vs 4-Hancock-Mikkelson
130 2.50 1.50 5-Holmgren-Krupp vs 3-Geil-Geil
110 0.50 3.50 1-Quintero-Vasilevsky vs 5-Dahl-Dunkley
110 0.50 3.50 2-Caplan-Vasilevsky vs 2-Harrigan-Fineberg
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
170 4.00 0.00 3-Contarsy-Lotief vs 3-Geil-Geil
140 3.00 1.00 2-Caplan-Vasilevsky vs 1-Cooper-Heberlee
50 1.00 3.00 1-Quintero-Vasilevsky vs 4-Hancock-Mikkelson
50 1.00 3.00 4-Chun-Sulerud vs 5-Dahl-Dunkley
50 1.00 3.00 5-Holmgren-Krupp vs 2-Harrigan-Fineberg
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
200 3.50 0.50 1-Quintero-Vasilevsky vs 4-Hancock-Mikkelson
200 3.50 0.50 4-Chun-Sulerud vs 5-Dahl-Dunkley
170 2.00 2.00 3-Contarsy-Lotief vs 3-Geil-Geil
140 1.00 3.00 2-Caplan-Vasilevsky vs 1-Cooper-Heberlee
90 0.00 4.00 5-Holmgren-Krupp vs 2-Harrigan-Fineberg
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
620 4.00 0.00 2-Caplan-Vasilevsky vs 1-Cooper-Heberlee
140 3.00 1.00 1-Quintero-Vasilevsky vs 4-Hancock-Mikkelson
100 1.50 2.50 3-Contarsy-Lotief vs 3-Geil-Geil
100 1.50 2.50 5-Holmgren-Krupp vs 2-Harrigan-Fineberg
600 0.00 4.00 4-Chun-Sulerud vs 5-Dahl-Dunkley
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
800 4.00 0.00 4-Chun-Sulerud vs 5-Dahl-Dunkley
430 3.00 1.00 3-Contarsy-Lotief vs 3-Geil-Geil
100 2.00 2.00 5-Holmgren-Krupp vs 2-Harrigan-Fineberg
50 1.00 3.00 2-Caplan-Vasilevsky vs 1-Cooper-Heberlee
100 0.00 4.00 1-Quintero-Vasilevsky vs 4-Hancock-Mikkelson
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
140 4.00 0.00 2-Caplan-Vasilevsky vs 1-Cooper-Heberlee
100 2.50 1.50 1-Quintero-Vasilevsky vs 4-Hancock-Mikkelson
100 2.50 1.50 4-Chun-Sulerud vs 5-Dahl-Dunkley
200 0.50 3.50 3-Contarsy-Lotief vs 3-Geil-Geil
200 0.50 3.50 5-Holmgren-Krupp vs 2-Harrigan-Fineberg
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
200 4.00 0.00 5-Holmgren-Krupp vs 1-Cooper-Heberlee
50 3.00 1.00 3-Contarsy-Lotief vs 2-Harrigan-Fineberg
130 2.00 2.00 1-Quintero-Vasilevsky vs 3-Geil-Geil
150 1.00 3.00 4-Chun-Sulerud vs 4-Hancock-Mikkelson
250 0.00 4.00 2-Caplan-Vasilevsky vs 5-Dahl-Dunkley
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
50 4.00 0.00 3-Contarsy-Lotief vs 2-Harrigan-Fineberg
120 3.00 1.00 5-Holmgren-Krupp vs 1-Cooper-Heberlee
170 2.00 2.00 4-Chun-Sulerud vs 4-Hancock-Mikkelson
400 1.00 3.00 2-Caplan-Vasilevsky vs 5-Dahl-Dunkley
430 0.00 4.00 1-Quintero-Vasilevsky vs 3-Geil-Geil
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
630 4.00 0.00 5-Holmgren-Krupp vs 1-Cooper-Heberlee
600 3.00 1.00 1-Quintero-Vasilevsky vs 3-Geil-Geil
150 2.00 2.00 2-Caplan-Vasilevsky vs 5-Dahl-Dunkley
140 0.50 3.50 3-Contarsy-Lotief vs 2-Harrigan-Fineberg
140 0.50 3.50 4-Chun-Sulerud vs 4-Hancock-Mikkelson
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
490 4.00 0.00 3-Contarsy-Lotief vs 2-Harrigan-Fineberg
480 1.50 2.50 1-Quintero-Vasilevsky vs 3-Geil-Geil
480 1.50 2.50 2-Caplan-Vasilevsky vs 5-Dahl-Dunkley
480 1.50 2.50 4-Chun-Sulerud vs 4-Hancock-Mikkelson
480 1.50 2.50 5-Holmgren-Krupp vs 1-Cooper-Heberlee
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
100 4.00 0.00 5-Holmgren-Krupp vs 1-Cooper-Heberlee
110 3.00 1.00 1-Quintero-Vasilevsky vs 3-Geil-Geil
140 1.50 2.50 2-Caplan-Vasilevsky vs 5-Dahl-Dunkley
140 1.50 2.50 3-Contarsy-Lotief vs 2-Harrigan-Fineberg
170 0.00 4.00 4-Chun-Sulerud vs 4-Hancock-Mikkelson
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
150 3.50 0.50 2-Caplan-Vasilevsky vs 4-Hancock-Mikkelson
150 3.50 0.50 4-Chun-Sulerud vs 3-Geil-Geil
140 2.00 2.00 3-Contarsy-Lotief vs 1-Cooper-Heberlee
130 0.50 3.50 1-Quintero-Vasilevsky vs 2-Harrigan-Fineberg
130 0.50 3.50 5-Holmgren-Krupp vs 5-Dahl-Dunkley
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
400 4.00 0.00 1-Quintero-Vasilevsky vs 2-Harrigan-Fineberg
230 3.00 1.00 2-Caplan-Vasilevsky vs 4-Hancock-Mikkelson
200 2.00 2.00 3-Contarsy-Lotief vs 1-Cooper-Heberlee
150 1.00 3.00 4-Chun-Sulerud vs 3-Geil-Geil
100 0.00 4.00 5-Holmgren-Krupp vs 5-Dahl-Dunkley
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
100 4.00 0.00 5-Holmgren-Krupp vs 5-Dahl-Dunkley
620 3.00 1.00 3-Contarsy-Lotief vs 1-Cooper-Heberlee
650 1.50 2.50 2-Caplan-Vasilevsky vs 4-Hancock-Mikkelson
650 1.50 2.50 4-Chun-Sulerud vs 3-Geil-Geil
660 0.00 4.00 1-Quintero-Vasilevsky vs 2-Harrigan-Fineberg
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
480 3.00 1.00 1-Quintero-Vasilevsky vs 2-Harrigan-Fineberg
480 3.00 1.00 2-Caplan-Vasilevsky vs 4-Hancock-Mikkelson
480 3.00 1.00 4-Chun-Sulerud vs 3-Geil-Geil
450 0.50 3.50 3-Contarsy-Lotief vs 1-Cooper-Heberlee
450 0.50 3.50 5-Holmgren-Krupp vs 5-Dahl-Dunkley
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
180 4.00 0.00 3-Contarsy-Lotief vs 1-Cooper-Heberlee
150 3.00 1.00 4-Chun-Sulerud vs 3-Geil-Geil
120 2.00 2.00 2-Caplan-Vasilevsky vs 4-Hancock-Mikkelson
90 1.00 3.00 1-Quintero-Vasilevsky vs 2-Harrigan-Fineberg
50 0.00 4.00 5-Holmgren-Krupp vs 5-Dahl-Dunkley
|