|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
50 5.00 0.00 5-Geil-Baltz vs 3-Achtman-Achtman
90 4.00 1.00 4-Schanz-Harrington vs 6-Dunkley-Graese
100 2.50 2.50 3-Caplan-Vasilevsky vs 4-Fineberg-Ledbetter
100 2.50 2.50 6-Poh-Fisher vs 5-Burke-Williams
110 0.50 4.50 1-Hayden-Marder vs 1-Mikkelson-Hancock
110 0.50 4.50 2-Chun-Sulerud vs 2-Harrigan-Gillespie
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
50 5.00 0.00 4-Schanz-Harrington vs 6-Dunkley-Graese
100 3.50 1.50 2-Chun-Sulerud vs 2-Harrigan-Gillespie
100 3.50 1.50 5-Geil-Baltz vs 3-Achtman-Achtman
120 2.00 3.00 3-Caplan-Vasilevsky vs 4-Fineberg-Ledbetter
200 1.00 4.00 6-Poh-Fisher vs 5-Burke-Williams
800 0.00 5.00 1-Hayden-Marder vs 1-Mikkelson-Hancock
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
430 5.00 0.00 3-Caplan-Vasilevsky vs 4-Fineberg-Ledbetter
400 2.50 2.50 2-Chun-Sulerud vs 2-Harrigan-Gillespie
400 2.50 2.50 4-Schanz-Harrington vs 6-Dunkley-Graese
400 2.50 2.50 5-Geil-Baltz vs 3-Achtman-Achtman
400 2.50 2.50 6-Poh-Fisher vs 5-Burke-Williams
120 0.00 5.00 1-Hayden-Marder vs 1-Mikkelson-Hancock
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
200 5.00 0.00 3-Caplan-Vasilevsky vs 4-Fineberg-Ledbetter
120 3.00 2.00 1-Hayden-Marder vs 1-Mikkelson-Hancock
120 3.00 2.00 2-Chun-Sulerud vs 2-Harrigan-Gillespie
120 3.00 2.00 5-Geil-Baltz vs 3-Achtman-Achtman
100 1.00 4.00 6-Poh-Fisher vs 5-Burke-Williams
100 0.00 5.00 4-Schanz-Harrington vs 6-Dunkley-Graese
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
430 4.00 1.00 2-Chun-Sulerud vs 1-Mikkelson-Hancock
430 4.00 1.00 3-Caplan-Vasilevsky vs 3-Achtman-Achtman
430 4.00 1.00 4-Schanz-Harrington vs 5-Burke-Williams
490 1.50 3.50 1-Hayden-Marder vs 6-Dunkley-Graese
490 1.50 3.50 6-Poh-Fisher vs 4-Fineberg-Ledbetter
990 0.00 5.00 5-Geil-Baltz vs 2-Harrigan-Gillespie
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
200 5.00 0.00 4-Schanz-Harrington vs 5-Burke-Williams
100 3.50 1.50 2-Chun-Sulerud vs 1-Mikkelson-Hancock
100 3.50 1.50 5-Geil-Baltz vs 2-Harrigan-Gillespie
90 2.00 3.00 3-Caplan-Vasilevsky vs 3-Achtman-Achtman
110 0.50 4.50 1-Hayden-Marder vs 6-Dunkley-Graese
110 0.50 4.50 6-Poh-Fisher vs 4-Fineberg-Ledbetter
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
100 4.50 0.50 4-Schanz-Harrington vs 5-Burke-Williams
100 4.50 0.50 5-Geil-Baltz vs 2-Harrigan-Gillespie
620 2.00 3.00 1-Hayden-Marder vs 6-Dunkley-Graese
620 2.00 3.00 2-Chun-Sulerud vs 1-Mikkelson-Hancock
620 2.00 3.00 6-Poh-Fisher vs 4-Fineberg-Ledbetter
660 0.00 5.00 3-Caplan-Vasilevsky vs 3-Achtman-Achtman
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
110 5.00 0.00 6-Poh-Fisher vs 4-Fineberg-Ledbetter
120 3.50 1.50 3-Caplan-Vasilevsky vs 3-Achtman-Achtman
120 3.50 1.50 5-Geil-Baltz vs 2-Harrigan-Gillespie
130 2.00 3.00 4-Schanz-Harrington vs 5-Burke-Williams
150 1.00 4.00 1-Hayden-Marder vs 6-Dunkley-Graese
180 0.00 5.00 2-Chun-Sulerud vs 1-Mikkelson-Hancock
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
460 5.00 0.00 1-Hayden-Marder vs 5-Burke-Williams
430 3.50 1.50 2-Chun-Sulerud vs 6-Dunkley-Graese
430 3.50 1.50 3-Caplan-Vasilevsky vs 2-Harrigan-Gillespie
400 1.50 3.50 5-Geil-Baltz vs 1-Mikkelson-Hancock
400 1.50 3.50 6-Poh-Fisher vs 3-Achtman-Achtman
50 0.00 5.00 4-Schanz-Harrington vs 4-Fineberg-Ledbetter
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
660 5.00 0.00 6-Poh-Fisher vs 3-Achtman-Achtman
620 2.50 2.50 2-Chun-Sulerud vs 6-Dunkley-Graese
620 2.50 2.50 3-Caplan-Vasilevsky vs 2-Harrigan-Gillespie
620 2.50 2.50 4-Schanz-Harrington vs 4-Fineberg-Ledbetter
620 2.50 2.50 5-Geil-Baltz vs 1-Mikkelson-Hancock
170 0.00 5.00 1-Hayden-Marder vs 5-Burke-Williams
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
170 5.00 0.00 6-Poh-Fisher vs 3-Achtman-Achtman
100 4.00 1.00 2-Chun-Sulerud vs 6-Dunkley-Graese
50 3.00 2.00 5-Geil-Baltz vs 1-Mikkelson-Hancock
50 2.00 3.00 4-Schanz-Harrington vs 4-Fineberg-Ledbetter
100 1.00 4.00 3-Caplan-Vasilevsky vs 2-Harrigan-Gillespie
130 0.00 5.00 1-Hayden-Marder vs 5-Burke-Williams
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
100 5.00 0.00 3-Caplan-Vasilevsky vs 2-Harrigan-Gillespie
50 4.00 1.00 5-Geil-Baltz vs 1-Mikkelson-Hancock
100 3.00 2.00 1-Hayden-Marder vs 5-Burke-Williams
130 1.50 3.50 4-Schanz-Harrington vs 4-Fineberg-Ledbetter
130 1.50 3.50 6-Poh-Fisher vs 3-Achtman-Achtman
200 0.00 5.00 2-Chun-Sulerud vs 6-Dunkley-Graese
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
200 5.00 0.00 3-Caplan-Vasilevsky vs 1-Mikkelson-Hancock
140 4.00 1.00 2-Chun-Sulerud vs 5-Burke-Williams
100 3.00 2.00 6-Poh-Fisher vs 2-Harrigan-Gillespie
100 1.50 3.50 1-Hayden-Marder vs 4-Fineberg-Ledbetter
100 1.50 3.50 5-Geil-Baltz vs 6-Dunkley-Graese
110 0.00 5.00 4-Schanz-Harrington vs 3-Achtman-Achtman
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
50 4.50 0.50 4-Schanz-Harrington vs 3-Achtman-Achtman
50 4.50 0.50 5-Geil-Baltz vs 6-Dunkley-Graese
100 2.50 2.50 2-Chun-Sulerud vs 5-Burke-Williams
100 2.50 2.50 6-Poh-Fisher vs 2-Harrigan-Gillespie
110 0.50 4.50 1-Hayden-Marder vs 4-Fineberg-Ledbetter
110 0.50 4.50 3-Caplan-Vasilevsky vs 1-Mikkelson-Hancock
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
140 5.00 0.00 2-Chun-Sulerud vs 5-Burke-Williams
110 4.00 1.00 4-Schanz-Harrington vs 3-Achtman-Achtman
100 2.00 3.00 1-Hayden-Marder vs 4-Fineberg-Ledbetter
100 2.00 3.00 5-Geil-Baltz vs 6-Dunkley-Graese
100 2.00 3.00 6-Poh-Fisher vs 2-Harrigan-Gillespie
300 0.00 5.00 3-Caplan-Vasilevsky vs 1-Mikkelson-Hancock
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
510 5.00 0.00 3-Caplan-Vasilevsky vs 1-Mikkelson-Hancock
400 4.00 1.00 5-Geil-Baltz vs 6-Dunkley-Graese
200 3.00 2.00 2-Chun-Sulerud vs 5-Burke-Williams
100 2.00 3.00 4-Schanz-Harrington vs 3-Achtman-Achtman
50 1.00 4.00 6-Poh-Fisher vs 2-Harrigan-Gillespie
110 0.00 5.00 1-Hayden-Marder vs 4-Fineberg-Ledbetter
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
520 4.00 1.00 1-Hayden-Marder vs 3-Achtman-Achtman
520 4.00 1.00 2-Chun-Sulerud vs 4-Fineberg-Ledbetter
520 4.00 1.00 5-Geil-Baltz vs 5-Burke-Williams
1020 1.00 4.00 3-Caplan-Vasilevsky vs 6-Dunkley-Graese
1020 1.00 4.00 4-Schanz-Harrington vs 2-Harrigan-Gillespie
1020 1.00 4.00 6-Poh-Fisher vs 1-Mikkelson-Hancock
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
660 5.00 0.00 3-Caplan-Vasilevsky vs 6-Dunkley-Graese
620 4.00 1.00 5-Geil-Baltz vs 5-Burke-Williams
600 2.00 3.00 1-Hayden-Marder vs 3-Achtman-Achtman
600 2.00 3.00 2-Chun-Sulerud vs 4-Fineberg-Ledbetter
600 2.00 3.00 4-Schanz-Harrington vs 2-Harrigan-Gillespie
150 0.00 5.00 6-Poh-Fisher vs 1-Mikkelson-Hancock
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
400 4.50 0.50 2-Chun-Sulerud vs 4-Fineberg-Ledbetter
400 4.50 0.50 4-Schanz-Harrington vs 2-Harrigan-Gillespie
100 3.00 2.00 1-Hayden-Marder vs 3-Achtman-Achtman
50 2.00 3.00 6-Poh-Fisher vs 1-Mikkelson-Hancock
150 0.50 4.50 3-Caplan-Vasilevsky vs 6-Dunkley-Graese
150 0.50 4.50 5-Geil-Baltz vs 5-Burke-Williams
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
600 5.00 0.00 5-Geil-Baltz vs 5-Burke-Williams
690 3.00 2.00 1-Hayden-Marder vs 3-Achtman-Achtman
690 3.00 2.00 2-Chun-Sulerud vs 4-Fineberg-Ledbetter
690 3.00 2.00 4-Schanz-Harrington vs 2-Harrigan-Gillespie
1370 1.00 4.00 6-Poh-Fisher vs 1-Mikkelson-Hancock
1430 0.00 5.00 3-Caplan-Vasilevsky vs 6-Dunkley-Graese
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
50 4.50 0.50 2-Chun-Sulerud vs 3-Achtman-Achtman
50 4.50 0.50 5-Geil-Baltz vs 4-Fineberg-Ledbetter
110 3.00 2.00 3-Caplan-Vasilevsky vs 5-Burke-Williams
130 1.00 4.00 1-Hayden-Marder vs 2-Harrigan-Gillespie
130 1.00 4.00 4-Schanz-Harrington vs 1-Mikkelson-Hancock
130 1.00 4.00 6-Poh-Fisher vs 6-Dunkley-Graese
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
150 4.00 1.00 1-Hayden-Marder vs 2-Harrigan-Gillespie
150 4.00 1.00 2-Chun-Sulerud vs 3-Achtman-Achtman
150 4.00 1.00 4-Schanz-Harrington vs 1-Mikkelson-Hancock
600 2.00 3.00 5-Geil-Baltz vs 4-Fineberg-Ledbetter
630 0.50 4.50 3-Caplan-Vasilevsky vs 5-Burke-Williams
630 0.50 4.50 6-Poh-Fisher vs 6-Dunkley-Graese
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
200 5.00 0.00 2-Chun-Sulerud vs 3-Achtman-Achtman
100 3.50 1.50 1-Hayden-Marder vs 2-Harrigan-Gillespie
100 3.50 1.50 3-Caplan-Vasilevsky vs 5-Burke-Williams
600 2.00 3.00 4-Schanz-Harrington vs 1-Mikkelson-Hancock
630 1.00 4.00 6-Poh-Fisher vs 6-Dunkley-Graese
660 0.00 5.00 5-Geil-Baltz vs 4-Fineberg-Ledbetter
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
430 5.00 0.00 2-Chun-Sulerud vs 3-Achtman-Achtman
400 3.00 2.00 1-Hayden-Marder vs 2-Harrigan-Gillespie
400 3.00 2.00 3-Caplan-Vasilevsky vs 5-Burke-Williams
400 3.00 2.00 4-Schanz-Harrington vs 1-Mikkelson-Hancock
50 0.50 4.50 5-Geil-Baltz vs 4-Fineberg-Ledbetter
50 0.50 4.50 6-Poh-Fisher vs 6-Dunkley-Graese
|