|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
980 2.00 0.00 5-Hancock-Mikkelson vs 3-Fineberg-Chun
420 1.00 1.00 6-Holmgren-Krupp vs 1-Poh-Latimer
50 0.00 2.00 4-Schanz-Harrington vs 2-Gillespie-Quintero
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
100 1.50 0.50 4-Schanz-Harrington vs 2-Gillespie-Quintero
100 1.50 0.50 6-Holmgren-Krupp vs 1-Poh-Latimer
420 0.00 2.00 5-Hancock-Mikkelson vs 3-Fineberg-Chun
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
300 2.00 0.00 4-Schanz-Harrington vs 2-Gillespie-Quintero
100 1.00 1.00 5-Hancock-Mikkelson vs 3-Fineberg-Chun
140 0.00 2.00 6-Holmgren-Krupp vs 1-Poh-Latimer
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
1440 1.00 1.00 4-Schanz-Harrington vs 2-Gillespie-Quintero
1440 1.00 1.00 5-Hancock-Mikkelson vs 3-Fineberg-Chun
1440 1.00 1.00 6-Holmgren-Krupp vs 1-Poh-Latimer
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
420 2.00 0.00 5-Hancock-Mikkelson vs 3-Fineberg-Chun
450 1.00 1.00 6-Holmgren-Krupp vs 1-Poh-Latimer
460 0.00 2.00 4-Schanz-Harrington vs 2-Gillespie-Quintero
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
130 2.00 0.00 6-Holmgren-Krupp vs 2-Gillespie-Quintero
100 0.50 1.50 1-Poh-Latimer vs 5-Hancock-Mikkelson
100 0.50 1.50 4-Schanz-Harrington vs 3-Fineberg-Chun
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
100 2.00 0.00 1-Poh-Latimer vs 5-Hancock-Mikkelson
630 1.00 1.00 4-Schanz-Harrington vs 3-Fineberg-Chun
660 0.00 2.00 6-Holmgren-Krupp vs 2-Gillespie-Quintero
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
130 2.00 0.00 6-Holmgren-Krupp vs 2-Gillespie-Quintero
120 1.00 1.00 4-Schanz-Harrington vs 3-Fineberg-Chun
50 0.00 2.00 1-Poh-Latimer vs 5-Hancock-Mikkelson
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
180 2.00 0.00 4-Schanz-Harrington vs 3-Fineberg-Chun
150 0.50 1.50 1-Poh-Latimer vs 5-Hancock-Mikkelson
150 0.50 1.50 6-Holmgren-Krupp vs 2-Gillespie-Quintero
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
500 2.00 0.00 1-Poh-Latimer vs 5-Hancock-Mikkelson
170 1.00 1.00 4-Schanz-Harrington vs 3-Fineberg-Chun
130 0.00 2.00 6-Holmgren-Krupp vs 2-Gillespie-Quintero
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
50 2.00 0.00 5-Hancock-Mikkelson vs 4-Schanz-Harrington
110 1.00 1.00 2-Gillespie-Quintero vs 1-Poh-Latimer
130 0.00 2.00 6-Holmgren-Krupp vs 3-Fineberg-Chun
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
620 1.50 0.50 5-Hancock-Mikkelson vs 4-Schanz-Harrington
620 1.50 0.50 6-Holmgren-Krupp vs 3-Fineberg-Chun
170 0.00 2.00 2-Gillespie-Quintero vs 1-Poh-Latimer
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
1430 2.00 0.00 6-Holmgren-Krupp vs 3-Fineberg-Chun
710 1.00 1.00 5-Hancock-Mikkelson vs 4-Schanz-Harrington
680 0.00 2.00 2-Gillespie-Quintero vs 1-Poh-Latimer
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
100 1.50 0.50 2-Gillespie-Quintero vs 1-Poh-Latimer
100 1.50 0.50 5-Hancock-Mikkelson vs 4-Schanz-Harrington
400 0.00 2.00 6-Holmgren-Krupp vs 3-Fineberg-Chun
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
150 2.00 0.00 2-Gillespie-Quintero vs 1-Poh-Latimer
400 1.00 1.00 5-Hancock-Mikkelson vs 4-Schanz-Harrington
1100 0.00 2.00 6-Holmgren-Krupp vs 3-Fineberg-Chun
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
200 2.00 0.00 3-Fineberg-Chun vs 1-Poh-Latimer
90 1.00 1.00 6-Holmgren-Krupp vs 4-Schanz-Harrington
150 0.00 2.00 2-Gillespie-Quintero vs 5-Hancock-Mikkelson
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
120 2.00 0.00 6-Holmgren-Krupp vs 4-Schanz-Harrington
150 1.00 1.00 3-Fineberg-Chun vs 1-Poh-Latimer
400 0.00 2.00 2-Gillespie-Quintero vs 5-Hancock-Mikkelson
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
460 2.00 0.00 3-Fineberg-Chun vs 1-Poh-Latimer
990 1.00 1.00 6-Holmgren-Krupp vs 4-Schanz-Harrington
1020 0.00 2.00 2-Gillespie-Quintero vs 5-Hancock-Mikkelson
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
100 2.00 0.00 3-Fineberg-Chun vs 1-Poh-Latimer
90 1.00 1.00 6-Holmgren-Krupp vs 4-Schanz-Harrington
630 0.00 2.00 2-Gillespie-Quintero vs 5-Hancock-Mikkelson
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
100 2.00 0.00 3-Fineberg-Chun vs 1-Poh-Latimer
170 1.00 1.00 2-Gillespie-Quintero vs 5-Hancock-Mikkelson
620 0.00 2.00 6-Holmgren-Krupp vs 4-Schanz-Harrington
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
50 2.00 0.00 6-Holmgren-Krupp vs 5-Hancock-Mikkelson
90 1.00 1.00 3-Fineberg-Chun vs 2-Gillespie-Quintero
140 0.00 2.00 1-Poh-Latimer vs 4-Schanz-Harrington
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
50 2.00 0.00 1-Poh-Latimer vs 4-Schanz-Harrington
100 1.00 1.00 3-Fineberg-Chun vs 2-Gillespie-Quintero
130 0.00 2.00 6-Holmgren-Krupp vs 5-Hancock-Mikkelson
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
210 2.00 0.00 1-Poh-Latimer vs 4-Schanz-Harrington
180 1.00 1.00 3-Fineberg-Chun vs 2-Gillespie-Quintero
200 0.00 2.00 6-Holmgren-Krupp vs 5-Hancock-Mikkelson
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
100 2.00 0.00 6-Holmgren-Krupp vs 5-Hancock-Mikkelson
50 1.00 1.00 3-Fineberg-Chun vs 2-Gillespie-Quintero
150 0.00 2.00 1-Poh-Latimer vs 4-Schanz-Harrington
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
490 2.00 0.00 6-Holmgren-Krupp vs 5-Hancock-Mikkelson
460 0.50 1.50 1-Poh-Latimer vs 4-Schanz-Harrington
460 0.50 1.50 3-Fineberg-Chun vs 2-Gillespie-Quintero
|