1 |
♠KQ2
♥QT83
♦A86
♣A62
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
♠J963
♥AJ975
♦-
♣JT83
|
♠A84
♥-
♦KQT953
♣Q754
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♥ 1NT ♣4 ♦6 ♠6 |
EW: 3♣ 1♦ 1♠ ♥5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 3.00 0.00 2♥ W -3 ♣A 6-Costantino-Rasmussen vs 5-Elmore-Wilson
100 2.00 1.00 2♦ E -2 ♠T 7-Hoppe-Bowman vs 3-Walsh-Walsh
100 1.00 2.00 4♥ N -2 ♠A 4-Larson-Larson vs 1-Livingston-Nolan
150 0.00 3.00 4♥ S -3 ♣J 9-Waterman-Triffet vs 2-Shannon-Shannon
|
2 |
♠QT4
♥A7
♦T763
♣K852
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
♠KJ985
♥KT5
♦AQ
♣973
|
♠A6
♥QJ862
♦J85
♣QJ4
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦6 ♥3 ♠4 NT4 |
EW: 1/2♣ 1♦ 4♥ 3♠ 2NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 2.50 0.50 2♥ E 2 ♠2 7-Hoppe-Bowman vs 3-Walsh-Walsh
110 2.50 0.50 2♥ E 2 ♣A 4-Larson-Larson vs 1-Livingston-Nolan
140 0.50 2.50 2♠ W 3 ♣8 9-Waterman-Triffet vs 2-Shannon-Shannon
140 0.50 2.50 2♥ W 3 ♥3 6-Costantino-Rasmussen vs 5-Elmore-Wilson
|
3 |
♠KJ93
♥AKQ64
♦4
♣A92
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
♠AT
♥JT953
♦Q632
♣KJ
|
♠642
♥7
♦AKJT985
♣T6
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 1♥ 3♠ ♦3 NT4 |
EW: 4♦ 2NT ♣3 ♥5 ♠3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 3.00 0.00 4♠ N 4 ♦A 6-Costantino-Rasmussen vs 5-Elmore-Wilson
170 2.00 1.00 3♠ S 4 ♦Q 4-Larson-Larson vs 1-Livingston-Nolan
110 1.00 2.00 3♦ E 3 ♣8 9-Waterman-Triffet vs 2-Shannon-Shannon
130 0.00 3.00 2♦ E 4 ♥8 7-Hoppe-Bowman vs 3-Walsh-Walsh
|
4 |
♠975
♥KQ32
♦5
♣Q7653
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
♠J
♥T8
♦KQ86432
♣A92
|
♠AQT862
♥AJ4
♦J9
♣J4
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♥ ♦2 ♠4 NT4 |
EW: 4♦ 2♠ 2NT ♣6 ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.00 0.00 5♦ W -1 ♥K 5-Elmore-Wilson vs 2-Shannon-Shannon
110 1.50 1.50 3♦ W 3 ♠9 7-Hoppe-Bowman vs 6-Costantino-Rasmussen
110 1.50 1.50 3♦ W 3 ♣5 10-Peterson-Peterson vs 9-Waterman-Triffet
130 0.00 3.00 2♦ W 4 ♥K 1-Livingston-Nolan vs 3-Walsh-Walsh
|
5 |
♠QJ85
♥952
♦T87
♣AJ7
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
♠A764
♥KJT76
♦6542
♣-
|
♠3
♥AQ
♦QJ93
♣KQ9643
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦3 ♥3 ♠6 NT6 |
EW: 2♣ 4♦ 3♥ 1NT ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
90 3.00 0.00 2♣ E 2 ♦A 1-Livingston-Nolan vs 3-Walsh-Walsh
110 2.00 1.00 3♦ E 3 ♠2 10-Peterson-Peterson vs 9-Waterman-Triffet
120 1.00 2.00 2N E 2 ♦A 5-Elmore-Wilson vs 2-Shannon-Shannon
150 0.00 3.00 2N E 3 ♦A 7-Hoppe-Bowman vs 6-Costantino-Rasmussen
|
6 |
♠KT973
♥52
♦-
♣KT8753
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
♠A642
♥KQT
♦A9632
♣J
|
♠J8
♥A98
♦KQJT875
♣A
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ ♦1 ♥4 ♠5 NT1 |
EW: 6♦ 1♥ 2♠ 6NT ♣4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
600 3.00 0.00 5♦ E 5 ♦4 1-Livingston-Nolan vs 3-Walsh-Walsh
620 2.00 1.00 5♦ E 6 ♦4 5-Elmore-Wilson vs 2-Shannon-Shannon
1370 0.50 2.50 6♦ E 6 ♥3 7-Hoppe-Bowman vs 6-Costantino-Rasmussen
1370 0.50 2.50 6♦ E 6 ♣4 10-Peterson-Peterson vs 9-Waterman-Triffet
|
7 |
♠QJ
♥QJ54
♦A752
♣Q76
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
♠A98
♥A8
♦KT43
♣J542
|
♠54
♥KT97
♦J96
♣AKT9
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣2 ♦3 ♥3 ♠6 NT3 |
EW: 5♣ 4♦ 4♥ 1♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
300 3.00 0.00 2N W -3 ♠Q 10-Peterson-Peterson vs 1-Livingston-Nolan
100 2.00 1.00 2♠ S -1 ♥A 6-Costantino-Rasmussen vs 3-Walsh-Walsh
130 1.00 2.00 2♣ E 4 ♠T 2-Shannon-Shannon vs 4-Larson-Larson
660 0.00 3.00 3N W 5 ♥4 9-Waterman-Triffet vs 5-Elmore-Wilson
|
8 |
♠KQ963
♥KQ9
♦J
♣T865
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
♠875
♥JT752
♦Q964
♣4
|
♠JT
♥64
♦T732
♣AKQJ7
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 1♥ 4♠ 2NT ♦6 |
EW: 1♦ ♣5 ♥4 ♠3 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 3.00 0.00 4♠ S 4 ♣4 10-Peterson-Peterson vs 1-Livingston-Nolan
50 1.50 1.50 4♠ S -1 ♣4 9-Waterman-Triffet vs 5-Elmore-Wilson
50 1.50 1.50 3♠ N -1 ♣A 2-Shannon-Shannon vs 4-Larson-Larson
490 0.00 3.00 3N W 6 ♥5 6-Costantino-Rasmussen vs 3-Walsh-Walsh
|
9 |
♠T5
♥KQT962
♦Q
♣KJT2
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
♠J764
♥743
♦T864
♣65
|
♠AK82
♥J8
♦J932
♣AQ8
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 1♦ 4/2♥ 3NT ♠6 |
EW: ♣2 ♦5 ♥2 ♠6 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 3.00 0.00 4♥ N 4 ♠A 6-Costantino-Rasmussen vs 3-Walsh-Walsh
170 2.00 1.00 2♥ N 4 ♠A 10-Peterson-Peterson vs 1-Livingston-Nolan
100 1.00 2.00 1N E -1 ♣7 9-Waterman-Triffet vs 5-Elmore-Wilson
50 0.00 3.00 4♥ N -1 ♠A 2-Shannon-Shannon vs 4-Larson-Larson
|
10 |
♠K52
♥KJ4
♦T9874
♣J6
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
♠QT764
♥AQ6
♦63
♣KQ4
|
♠AJ8
♥T732
♦J52
♣872
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 2♦ ♥6 ♠5 NT5 |
EW: 1♥ 2♠ ♣5 ♦5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 2.50 0.50 3♠ W -1 ♣J 7-Hoppe-Bowman vs 4-Larson-Larson
100 2.50 0.50 2♠ W -1 ♣J 10-Peterson-Peterson vs 2-Shannon-Shannon
110 0.50 2.50 2♠ W 2 ♣J 3-Walsh-Walsh vs 5-Elmore-Wilson
110 0.50 2.50 1♠ W 2 ♣6 1-Livingston-Nolan vs 6-Costantino-Rasmussen
|
11 |
♠T732
♥K62
♦QJ85
♣J9
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
♠5
♥J5
♦A762
♣A87543
|
♠J9
♥T973
♦T3
♣KQT62
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♦ 3♥ 6♠ ♣4 NT6 |
EW: 3♣ ♦3 ♥3 ♠1 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
480 2.00 1.00 5♠ S 6 ♣A 3-Walsh-Walsh vs 5-Elmore-Wilson
480 2.00 1.00 4♠ S 6 ♠5 1-Livingston-Nolan vs 6-Costantino-Rasmussen
480 2.00 1.00 4♠ S 6 ♦A 7-Hoppe-Bowman vs 4-Larson-Larson
300 0.00 3.00 5♣* W -2 ♠2 10-Peterson-Peterson vs 2-Shannon-Shannon
|
12 |
♠52
♥AKJ763
♦A8
♣KQ3
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
♠AT6
♥9542
♦Q63
♣T96
|
♠K9843
♥T
♦KJT54
♣J2
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 5♥ 5NT ♦5 ♠5 |
EW: 2♦ 2♠ ♣1 ♥1 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
680 2.50 0.50 4♥ N 6 ♦J 7-Hoppe-Bowman vs 4-Larson-Larson
680 2.50 0.50 4♥ N 6 ♦J 10-Peterson-Peterson vs 2-Shannon-Shannon
650 1.00 2.00 4♥ N 5 ♠4 3-Walsh-Walsh vs 5-Elmore-Wilson
620 0.00 3.00 4♥ N 4 ♠7 1-Livingston-Nolan vs 6-Costantino-Rasmussen
|
13 |
♠JT652
♥Q
♦AK75
♣A76
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
♠8
♥KJT85
♦432
♣9542
|
♠K9
♥A743
♦J986
♣QJT
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 3♦ 6♠ 2NT ♥6 |
EW: ♣4 ♦3/2 ♥6 ♠1 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
680 2.50 0.50 4♠ N 6 ♥A 2-Shannon-Shannon vs 7-Hoppe-Bowman
680 2.50 0.50 4♠ N 6 ♣Q 10-Peterson-Peterson vs 3-Walsh-Walsh
650 0.50 2.50 4♠ N 5 ♣Q 1-Livingston-Nolan vs 9-Waterman-Triffet
650 0.50 2.50 4♠ N 5 ♣Q 4-Larson-Larson vs 6-Costantino-Rasmussen
|
14 |
♠J4
♥A53
♦T764
♣T764
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
♠A962
♥K
♦KQJ932
♣K3
|
♠KT873
♥Q9642
♦8
♣QJ
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ ♦3 ♥5 ♠3 NT3 |
EW: 4♦ 1♥ 4♠ 1NT ♣5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 3.00 0.00 3♠ E -1 ♦A 10-Peterson-Peterson vs 3-Walsh-Walsh
420 2.00 1.00 4♠ W 4 ♥A 1-Livingston-Nolan vs 9-Waterman-Triffet
450 0.50 2.50 4♠ E 5 ♥J 2-Shannon-Shannon vs 7-Hoppe-Bowman
450 0.50 2.50 4♠ E 5 ♦A 4-Larson-Larson vs 6-Costantino-Rasmussen
|
15 |
♠AJ84
♥AJT
♦-
♣AKT972
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
♠T72
♥K8743
♦AJ2
♣Q4
|
♠93
♥965
♦KT875
♣J53
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 6♣ 2♦ 2♥ 7♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣1 ♦5 ♥5 ♠0 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
710 2.00 1.00 4♠ S 7 ♠7 1-Livingston-Nolan vs 9-Waterman-Triffet
710 2.00 1.00 4♠ S 7 ♣Q 2-Shannon-Shannon vs 7-Hoppe-Bowman
710 2.00 1.00 4♠ N 7 ♥5 10-Peterson-Peterson vs 3-Walsh-Walsh
650 0.00 3.00 4♠ S 5 ♥3 4-Larson-Larson vs 6-Costantino-Rasmussen
|
16 |
♠T
♥KT9
♦AJ9743
♣AQ5
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
♠Q9632
♥Q63
♦K82
♣T8
|
♠8754
♥754
♦-
♣K97432
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2/1♣ 7♦ 7/6♥ 2♠ 7NT |
EW: ♣5 ♦0 ♥0 ♠5 NT0 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
920 3.00 0.00 6♦ N 6 ♠4 10-Peterson-Peterson vs 4-Larson-Larson
520 2.00 1.00 3N S 7 ♠3 2-Shannon-Shannon vs 1-Livingston-Nolan
420 0.50 2.50 5♦ N 6 ♠8 9-Waterman-Triffet vs 6-Costantino-Rasmussen
420 0.50 2.50 5♦ N 6 ♥7 5-Elmore-Wilson vs 7-Hoppe-Bowman
|
17 |
♠J5
♥AKQ654
♦9
♣KQ63
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
♠T943
♥T
♦KT8
♣JT742
|
♠A872
♥82
♦J653
♣A95
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 2♦ 5♥ 3NT ♠6 |
EW: ♣6 ♦4 ♥1 ♠6 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
450 2.00 1.00 5♥ N 5 ♠A 9-Waterman-Triffet vs 6-Costantino-Rasmussen
450 2.00 1.00 4♥ N 5 ♠A 5-Elmore-Wilson vs 7-Hoppe-Bowman
450 2.00 1.00 4♥ N 5 ♣A 10-Peterson-Peterson vs 4-Larson-Larson
50 0.00 3.00 6♥ N -1 ♠A 2-Shannon-Shannon vs 1-Livingston-Nolan
|
18 |
♠QT43
♥AQ76
♦T6
♣932
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
♠9852
♥J32
♦A32
♣Q86
|
♠A
♥KT9
♦K98754
♣K75
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ 1♠ ♣6 ♦3 NT4 |
EW: 1♣ 4♦ 2NT ♥6 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
130 2.00 1.00 3♦ E 4 ♥8 5-Elmore-Wilson vs 7-Hoppe-Bowman
130 2.00 1.00 3♦ E 4 ♥8 9-Waterman-Triffet vs 6-Costantino-Rasmussen
130 2.00 1.00 3♦ E 4 ♥3 2-Shannon-Shannon vs 1-Livingston-Nolan
200 0.00 3.00 2♥ N -2 ♠A 10-Peterson-Peterson vs 4-Larson-Larson
|
19 |
♠8642
♥A842
♦8
♣AK95
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
♠AT7
♥T96
♦J54
♣Q732
|
♠53
♥KQJ3
♦AQT972
♣J
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 3♠ 1NT ♦4 ♥6 |
EW: 2♦ 1♥ ♣4 ♠3 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.00 0.00 4♠ S -2 ♦4 4-Larson-Larson vs 9-Waterman-Triffet
110 1.50 1.50 2♦ E 3 ♠K 1-Livingston-Nolan vs 7-Hoppe-Bowman
110 1.50 1.50 2♦ E 3 ♠K 10-Peterson-Peterson vs 5-Elmore-Wilson
150 0.00 3.00 1N W 3 ♣5 3-Walsh-Walsh vs 2-Shannon-Shannon
|
20 |
♠J97
♥AKQ976
♦KT86
♣-
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
♠A3
♥JT842
♦Q53
♣A64
|
♠K654
♥-
♦J97
♣KQJT75
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 2♥ ♣2 ♠6 NT5 |
EW: 4♣ 1♠ 1/2NT ♦5/6 ♥5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.00 0.00 2♥ N -1 ♠4 4-Larson-Larson vs 9-Waterman-Triffet
130 1.50 1.50 4♣ E 4 ♥5 10-Peterson-Peterson vs 5-Elmore-Wilson
130 1.50 1.50 3♣ E 4 ♥5 1-Livingston-Nolan vs 7-Hoppe-Bowman
150 0.00 3.00 1N W 3 ♥A 3-Walsh-Walsh vs 2-Shannon-Shannon
|
21 |
♠954
♥T53
♦K842
♣832
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
♠T732
♥KJ987
♦T7
♣KT
|
♠KJ6
♥Q4
♦Q95
♣QJ654
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 2NT ♣6 ♥6 ♠6 |
EW: 1♥ 1/-♠ ♣6 ♦5/4 ♠7/6 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
120 3.00 0.00 1N S 2 ♥8 1-Livingston-Nolan vs 7-Hoppe-Bowman
90 1.50 1.50 2♦ S 2 ♠2 3-Walsh-Walsh vs 2-Shannon-Shannon
90 1.50 1.50 1♦ S 2 ♠2 10-Peterson-Peterson vs 5-Elmore-Wilson
100 0.00 3.00 2N S -1 ♥7 4-Larson-Larson vs 9-Waterman-Triffet
|
22 |
♠AJ5
♥432
♦QT42
♣J32
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
♠KT4
♥AQT97
♦8
♣AKT7
|
♠Q32
♥J85
♦J973
♣986
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ ♣4 ♥4 ♠6 NT5 |
EW: 3♣ 3♥ 1♠ 2NT ♦6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 3.00 0.00 3♦ S -1 ♣A 5-Elmore-Wilson vs 1-Livingston-Nolan
140 1.00 2.00 3♥ W 3 ♦2 7-Hoppe-Bowman vs 9-Waterman-Triffet
140 1.00 2.00 3♥ W 3 ♦2 10-Peterson-Peterson vs 6-Costantino-Rasmussen
140 1.00 2.00 2♥ W 3 ♦2 4-Larson-Larson vs 3-Walsh-Walsh
|
23 |
♠54
♥K6
♦KQT872
♣K82
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
♠872
♥8432
♦J94
♣A63
|
♠KQT63
♥J95
♦A653
♣J
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 6♣ 3♦ 3♥ 2♠ 4NT |
EW: ♣1 ♦4 ♥3 ♠5 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
660 3.00 0.00 3N S 5 ♠7 10-Peterson-Peterson vs 6-Costantino-Rasmussen
170 2.00 1.00 3♣ S 6 ♥3 4-Larson-Larson vs 3-Walsh-Walsh
150 0.50 2.50 4♣ S 5 ♠2 7-Hoppe-Bowman vs 9-Waterman-Triffet
150 0.50 2.50 2♣ S 5 ♠8 5-Elmore-Wilson vs 1-Livingston-Nolan
|
24 |
♠854
♥K8732
♦J6
♣KJ2
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
♠QT2
♥J64
♦Q743
♣T85
|
♠K9
♥QT9
♦AT9852
♣63
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 3♥ 4♠ 1NT ♦5 |
EW: 1♦ ♣3 ♥3 ♠3 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
450 2.50 0.50 4♠ S 5 ♦8 10-Peterson-Peterson vs 6-Costantino-Rasmussen
450 2.50 0.50 4♠ S 5 ♣T 5-Elmore-Wilson vs 1-Livingston-Nolan
420 0.50 2.50 4♠ S 4 ♥4 4-Larson-Larson vs 3-Walsh-Walsh
420 0.50 2.50 4♠ S 4 ♦3 7-Hoppe-Bowman vs 9-Waterman-Triffet
|
25 |
♠J9
♥64
♦KQT
♣AQ8643
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
♠T875
♥Q83
♦953
♣JT5
|
♠AKQ6
♥KT5
♦AJ872
♣9
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 1♥ 1NT ♦5/4 ♠4/3 |
EW: 2♦ 3♠ ♣4 ♥6 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 2.50 0.50 3♣ N 3 ♠A 10-Peterson-Peterson vs 7-Hoppe-Bowman
110 2.50 0.50 2♣ N 3 ♠A 6-Costantino-Rasmussen vs 2-Shannon-Shannon
110 0.50 2.50 2♠ E 2 ♣K 5-Elmore-Wilson vs 4-Larson-Larson
110 0.50 2.50 3♦ E 3 ♣K 3-Walsh-Walsh vs 9-Waterman-Triffet
|
26 |
♠J7
♥74
♦J862
♣A8742
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
♠KT862
♥K96
♦T9
♣K63
|
♠A543
♥AQ53
♦A54
♣95
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♦ ♥4 ♠3 NT4 |
EW: 3♥ 4♠ 3NT ♣5 ♦6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 2.50 0.50 3♠ W 4 ♦2 10-Peterson-Peterson vs 7-Hoppe-Bowman
170 2.50 0.50 2♠ W 4 ♥7 6-Costantino-Rasmussen vs 2-Shannon-Shannon
620 0.50 2.50 4♠ W 4 ♥7 5-Elmore-Wilson vs 4-Larson-Larson
620 0.50 2.50 4♠ W 4 ♦8 3-Walsh-Walsh vs 9-Waterman-Triffet
|
27 |
♠QJT5
♥76
♦AQ32
♣KT9
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
♠863
♥AK94
♦T7
♣AJ74
|
♠K9742
♥J53
♦KJ6
♣85
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 2♦ ♥5 ♠5 NT6 |
EW: 1♥ 2♠ 1NT ♣6 ♦5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 3.00 0.00 3♠ E -3 ♥2 10-Peterson-Peterson vs 7-Hoppe-Bowman
110 2.00 1.00 2♦ N 3 ♣8 5-Elmore-Wilson vs 4-Larson-Larson
100 1.00 2.00 4♦ N -2 ♣4 6-Costantino-Rasmussen vs 2-Shannon-Shannon
110 0.00 3.00 2♠ E 2 ♥2 3-Walsh-Walsh vs 9-Waterman-Triffet
|