1 |
♠KQ54
♥AK
♦T9
♣KQ732
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
♠6
♥J932
♦J8642
♣A85
|
♠AJ9732
♥Q87
♦A
♣JT4
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ ♣6 ♥5 ♠5 NT6 |
EW: 1♥ 2♠ ♣6 ♦5/6 NT5/6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
430 2.00 0.00 3N N 4 ♠7 5-Livingston-Mousley vs 6-Waterman-Denz
150 1.00 1.00 1N N 3 ♠7 2-Pratt-Mastic vs 4-Wainman-Roberts
120 0.00 2.00 1N N 2 ♠7 8-Peterson-Peterson vs 1-Wandersee-Wandersee
|
2 |
♠AQJ2
♥5
♦J976
♣AQT2
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
♠873
♥KQ63
♦T5
♣K864
|
♠KT65
♥AT87
♦AQ432
♣-
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ ♦5 ♥4 ♠6 NT6 |
EW: 2♦ 3♥ 1♠ ♣5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 1.50 0.50 4♥ W -1 ♣A 2-Pratt-Mastic vs 4-Wainman-Roberts
50 1.50 0.50 3♥ W -1 ♠A 8-Peterson-Peterson vs 1-Wandersee-Wandersee
420 0.00 2.00 4♥ W 4 ♣T 5-Livingston-Mousley vs 6-Waterman-Denz
|
3 |
♠2
♥9
♦KT952
♣AK9873
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
♠643
♥KQ63
♦Q87
♣T42
|
♠QJT98
♥J2
♦AJ6
♣QJ6
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 4♦ 2♥ 1♠ NT6 |
EW: ♣3 ♦3 ♥4 ♠5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 2.00 0.00 3♣ N -1 ♠Q 5-Livingston-Mousley vs 6-Waterman-Denz
100 1.00 1.00 4♥ S -2 ♠3 2-Pratt-Mastic vs 4-Wainman-Roberts
250 0.00 2.00 3N N -5 ♠Q 8-Peterson-Peterson vs 1-Wandersee-Wandersee
|
4 |
♠K52
♥T743
♦J752
♣73
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
♠QJ7
♥KQ986
♦K9
♣542
|
♠AT98
♥AJ5
♦64
♣AJ86
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ ♣4 ♥2 ♠2 NT2 |
EW: 3♣ 5♥ 5/4♠ 5/4NT ♦6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 2.00 0.00 3♥ W 4 ♦2 8-Peterson-Peterson vs 1-Wandersee-Wandersee
200 1.00 1.00 2♠ E 5 ♥2 2-Pratt-Mastic vs 4-Wainman-Roberts
650 0.00 2.00 4♥ W 5 ♣3 5-Livingston-Mousley vs 6-Waterman-Denz
|
5 |
♠KJ7
♥A763
♦KT864
♣6
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
♠T532
♥KQ542
♦QJ5
♣7
|
♠A64
♥J9
♦9
♣AQT9853
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ 1♥ 1♠ 2NT ♣6 |
EW: 1♣ ♦4 ♥6 ♠6 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 1.50 0.50 3♣ E -2 ♥T 6-Waterman-Denz vs 7-Elmore-Whitmore
100 1.50 0.50 3♣ E -2 ♦A 8-Peterson-Peterson vs 2-Pratt-Mastic
100 0.00 2.00 3♦ N -1 ♠A 4-Wainman-Roberts vs 1-Wandersee-Wandersee
|
6 |
♠AK954
♥K953
♦J6
♣A8
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
♠Q2
♥872
♦AKT42
♣K97
|
♠J8
♥AJ4
♦8753
♣QJ64
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♥ 3♠ ♣4/6 ♦4 NT6 |
EW: 1♣ 2♦ ♥4 ♠4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 1.50 0.50 2♠ N 4 ♥4 6-Waterman-Denz vs 7-Elmore-Whitmore
170 1.50 0.50 2♠ N 4 ♣Q 8-Peterson-Peterson vs 2-Pratt-Mastic
110 0.00 2.00 3♦ W 3 ♠A 4-Wainman-Roberts vs 1-Wandersee-Wandersee
|
7 |
♠K87
♥AK43
♦KJ76
♣T4
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
♠J9542
♥Q87
♦Q4
♣KJ5
|
♠T63
♥JT95
♦T98
♣872
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 6♦ 4♥ 3/4♠ 5NT |
EW: ♣2 ♦1 ♥3 ♠3 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
660 2.00 0.00 3N S 5 ♠4 6-Waterman-Denz vs 7-Elmore-Whitmore
630 1.00 1.00 3N S 4 ♠2 8-Peterson-Peterson vs 2-Pratt-Mastic
100 0.00 2.00 3N N -1 ♥J 4-Wainman-Roberts vs 1-Wandersee-Wandersee
|
8 |
♠7653
♥J
♦KQ763
♣T42
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
♠KQT2
♥A92
♦J42
♣AJ9
|
♠9
♥Q8
♦AT985
♣KQ876
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣2 ♦2 ♥6 ♠3 NT2 |
EW: 5/4♣ 4♦ 1♥ 5/4NT ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
130 2.00 0.00 4♣ E 4 ♥6 8-Peterson-Peterson vs 2-Pratt-Mastic
300 1.00 1.00 4♥* S -2 ♠K 6-Waterman-Denz vs 7-Elmore-Whitmore
490 0.00 2.00 3N W 6 ♦K 4-Wainman-Roberts vs 1-Wandersee-Wandersee
|
9 |
♠J4
♥AK7
♦AJ4
♣JT764
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
♠972
♥JT98
♦KQ8
♣A82
|
♠AKT853
♥62
♦T76
♣Q5
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 2♦ 2♥ ♠5 NT5 |
EW: 2♠ 1NT ♣4 ♦4/5 ♥5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 1.00 1.00 3♠ E 3 ♣K 4-Wainman-Roberts vs 6-Waterman-Denz
140 1.00 1.00 2♠ E 3 ♥5 5-Livingston-Mousley vs 2-Pratt-Mastic
140 1.00 1.00 2♠ E 3 ♣3 7-Elmore-Whitmore vs 1-Wandersee-Wandersee
|
10 |
♠A2
♥KJ92
♦KT
♣KQ875
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
♠T73
♥A753
♦QJ2
♣A94
|
♠QJ964
♥QT6
♦754
♣J3
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5/4♣ 3/4♦ 2♥ 1♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣2 ♦3 ♥4 ♠5/6 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 1.00 1.00 3N N -1 ♠6 4-Wainman-Roberts vs 6-Waterman-Denz
100 1.00 1.00 1N N -1 ♠6 5-Livingston-Mousley vs 2-Pratt-Mastic
100 1.00 1.00 3♣ N -1 ♠Q 7-Elmore-Whitmore vs 1-Wandersee-Wandersee
|
11 |
♠AQJ953
♥6
♦Q73
♣AK4
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
♠K872
♥842
♦A85
♣Q92
|
♠-
♥KT9
♦KT9642
♣8653
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 5/4♥ 5♠ 1NT ♦5 |
EW: 1♦ ♣5 ♥2 ♠2 NT2/5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 2.00 0.00 3♠ N 4 ♣3 5-Livingston-Mousley vs 2-Pratt-Mastic
140 1.00 1.00 2♥ S 3 ♠2 7-Elmore-Whitmore vs 1-Wandersee-Wandersee
100 0.00 2.00 3N N -2 ♦T 4-Wainman-Roberts vs 6-Waterman-Denz
|
12 |
♠AKQ32
♥AQ2
♦75
♣865
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
♠985
♥T985
♦AKQ6
♣Q7
|
♠J764
♥4
♦J94
♣KJT93
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 3♥ 2♠ 3NT ♣6 |
EW: 1♣ ♦6 ♥3 ♠3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
620 2.00 0.00 4♥ S 4 ♦A 5-Livingston-Mousley vs 2-Pratt-Mastic
170 1.00 1.00 2♠ N 4 ♥4 7-Elmore-Whitmore vs 1-Wandersee-Wandersee
100 0.00 2.00 2♠ N -1 ♥4 4-Wainman-Roberts vs 6-Waterman-Denz
|
13 |
♠987
♥Q85
♦JT
♣QJT97
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
♠KJ53
♥AK
♦9652
♣832
|
♠QT42
♥J94
♦AKQ
♣654
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6 ♦4 ♥6 ♠3 NT4 |
EW: 1♣ 3♦ 4♠ 3NT ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 1.00 1.00 3♠ W 3 ♦J 5-Livingston-Mousley vs 7-Elmore-Whitmore
140 1.00 1.00 2♠ W 3 ♥5 1-Wandersee-Wandersee vs 2-Pratt-Mastic
140 1.00 1.00 2♠ W 3 ♥5 8-Peterson-Peterson vs 4-Wainman-Roberts
|
14 |
♠AQ9
♥KQJ75
♦A7
♣752
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
♠JT62
♥-
♦KQJ98653
♣T
|
♠K753
♥9632
♦-
♣AKQJ9
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ 1NT ♣6/5 ♦2 ♠2 |
EW: 5♦ 5♠ ♣6 ♥5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 2.00 0.00 4♠ E -2 ♥A 8-Peterson-Peterson vs 4-Wainman-Roberts
50 1.00 1.00 4♠ W -1 ♥5 5-Livingston-Mousley vs 7-Elmore-Whitmore
130 0.00 2.00 4♦ W 4 ♥K 1-Wandersee-Wandersee vs 2-Pratt-Mastic
|
15 |
♠A984
♥KT8
♦JT
♣A983
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
♠KJ
♥9754
♦AK53
♣QT2
|
♠Q72
♥63
♦Q8762
♣654
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 2♥ 2♠ 1NT ♦5 |
EW: 2♦ ♣5 ♥5 ♠5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 2.00 0.00 3♥ S 3 ♦A 8-Peterson-Peterson vs 4-Wainman-Roberts
110 1.00 1.00 2♥ S 2 ♦A 5-Livingston-Mousley vs 7-Elmore-Whitmore
90 0.00 2.00 1♦ W 2 ♠A 1-Wandersee-Wandersee vs 2-Pratt-Mastic
|
16 |
♠QT8
♥6
♦JT65432
♣AQ
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
♠3
♥T532
♦98
♣K98753
|
♠J7542
♥AQ974
♦A
♣J4
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♦ 4♠ 5NT ♣6 ♥5 |
EW: 1♣ 2♥ ♦2 ♠3 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
500 2.00 0.00 3♥* E -2 ♠A 8-Peterson-Peterson vs 4-Wainman-Roberts
460 1.00 1.00 3N S 5 ♣9 5-Livingston-Mousley vs 7-Elmore-Whitmore
400 0.00 2.00 5♦ N 5 ♥A 1-Wandersee-Wandersee vs 2-Pratt-Mastic
|
17 |
♠876
♥AK86
♦JT8
♣AK7
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
♠5
♥QJ732
♦KQ54
♣T85
|
♠AKJ32
♥94
♦763
♣Q64
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ -/1♦ 1♠ 2NT ♦6/7 ♥6 |
EW: 1♥ ♣5 ♦6 ♠6 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 1.50 0.50 1N N 3 ♠A 8-Peterson-Peterson vs 5-Livingston-Mousley
150 1.50 0.50 2♠ E -3 ♥T 7-Elmore-Whitmore vs 4-Wainman-Roberts
120 0.00 2.00 1N N 2 ♠A 6-Waterman-Denz vs 1-Wandersee-Wandersee
|
18 |
♠J6
♥743
♦A652
♣AT95
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
♠QT8742
♥Q5
♦T97
♣KQ
|
♠9
♥T86
♦QJ843
♣8763
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 1♦ 6♥ 2/3♠ 6NT |
EW: ♣1 ♦4 ♥1 ♠4 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
650 1.50 0.50 4♥ S 5 ♣Q 8-Peterson-Peterson vs 5-Livingston-Mousley
650 1.50 0.50 4♥ S 5 ♣3 6-Waterman-Denz vs 1-Wandersee-Wandersee
620 0.00 2.00 4♥ S 4 ♣K 7-Elmore-Whitmore vs 4-Wainman-Roberts
|
19 |
♠A5
♥AK85
♦953
♣AQJ5
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
♠KQT96
♥J93
♦QJ2
♣73
|
♠J84
♥T
♦AK76
♣98642
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 4♥ 3NT ♦6 ♠4 |
EW: 1♦ 2♠ ♣5 ♥2 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
450 1.50 0.50 4♥ S 5 ♠K 6-Waterman-Denz vs 1-Wandersee-Wandersee
450 1.50 0.50 4♥ S 5 ♠T 8-Peterson-Peterson vs 5-Livingston-Mousley
200 0.00 2.00 3♥ N 5 ♣9 7-Elmore-Whitmore vs 4-Wainman-Roberts
|
20 |
♠AQ763
♥4
♦KQT54
♣KQ
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
♠J954
♥AJ52
♦J3
♣J53
|
♠KT2
♥983
♦A9762
♣84
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 2♦ 3♥ 2♠ 1NT |
EW: ♣2 ♦4 ♥4 ♠5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
630 1.50 0.50 3N S 4 ♠4 6-Waterman-Denz vs 1-Wandersee-Wandersee
630 1.50 0.50 3N S 4 ♥2 8-Peterson-Peterson vs 5-Livingston-Mousley
100 0.00 2.00 3N S -1 ♣J 7-Elmore-Whitmore vs 4-Wainman-Roberts
|
21 |
♠KJ7
♥A8
♦AK986
♣642
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
♠T4
♥T54
♦T54
♣AQ875
|
♠Q96532
♥976
♦73
♣93
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 4/6♦ 4/6♥ 2/1♠ 5/6NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦0 ♥1 ♠5 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
1470 1.50 0.50 6N N 7 ♠5 1-Wandersee-Wandersee vs 5-Livingston-Mousley
1470 1.50 0.50 6N N 7 ♠5 7-Elmore-Whitmore vs 2-Pratt-Mastic
1460 0.00 2.00 6♥ N 7 ♠2 8-Peterson-Peterson vs 6-Waterman-Denz
|
22 |
♠73
♥K97
♦AQT85
♣J63
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
♠KJ94
♥A
♦J7643
♣752
|
♠Q2
♥T653
♦2
♣AKQT84
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 2♥ 1♠ ♣3 NT5 |
EW: 4♣ 1NT ♦6 ♥4 ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 2.00 0.00 2♥ N 3 ♣A 8-Peterson-Peterson vs 6-Waterman-Denz
50 1.00 1.00 4♥ N -1 ♦2 1-Wandersee-Wandersee vs 5-Livingston-Mousley
800 0.00 2.00 5♥* N -4 ♦2 7-Elmore-Whitmore vs 2-Pratt-Mastic
|
23 |
♠K4
♥K74
♦QJT3
♣QJT3
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
♠AQ32
♥QJ5
♦752
♣975
|
♠JT765
♥AT862
♦98
♣4
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 4♦ 1NT ♥4 ♠4 |
EW: 3♥ 3♠ ♣3 ♦3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
660 2.00 0.00 3N N 5 ♥6 7-Elmore-Whitmore vs 2-Pratt-Mastic
630 0.50 1.50 3N N 4 ♠J 8-Peterson-Peterson vs 6-Waterman-Denz
630 0.50 1.50 3N N 4 ♥6 1-Wandersee-Wandersee vs 5-Livingston-Mousley
|
24 |
♠AK9765
♥A9
♦T6
♣A84
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
♠Q2
♥QT852
♦94
♣QT53
|
♠T3
♥J643
♦AK83
♣J92
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 3♦ 4♠ 4NT ♥6 |
EW: 1♥ ♣4 ♦3 ♠2 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
450 1.50 0.50 4♠ N 5 ♦A 7-Elmore-Whitmore vs 2-Pratt-Mastic
450 1.50 0.50 4♠ N 5 ♦6 1-Wandersee-Wandersee vs 5-Livingston-Mousley
200 0.00 2.00 2♠ N 5 ♦A 8-Peterson-Peterson vs 6-Waterman-Denz
|
25 |
♠QT8752
♥K4
♦J93
♣J4
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
♠A
♥QJT765
♦A4
♣Q853
|
♠K6
♥A83
♦QT865
♣T62
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♠ ♣3 ♦4 ♥3 NT3 |
EW: 4♣ 3♦ 4♥ 4NT ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 2.00 0.00 3♠ N 3 ♥A 8-Peterson-Peterson vs 7-Elmore-Whitmore
100 1.00 1.00 4♠ N -2 ♦T 2-Pratt-Mastic vs 6-Waterman-Denz
170 0.00 2.00 3♥ E 4 ♣J 4-Wainman-Roberts vs 5-Livingston-Mousley
|
26 |
♠AKJ743
♥K
♦Q7
♣T865
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
♠Q96
♥T4
♦AJT43
♣AK2
|
♠852
♥7652
♦962
♣973
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 2♦ 4♥ 4♠ 4NT |
EW: ♣3 ♦5 ♥1 ♠1/3 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
630 1.50 0.50 3N S 4 ♦4 8-Peterson-Peterson vs 7-Elmore-Whitmore
630 1.50 0.50 3N N 4 ♦4 4-Wainman-Roberts vs 5-Livingston-Mousley
140 0.00 2.00 3♠ N 3 ♦6 2-Pratt-Mastic vs 6-Waterman-Denz
|
27 |
♠T82
♥KJ7
♦AJT6
♣KQ3
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
♠KJ
♥Q62
♦95432
♣J74
|
♠AQ9654
♥T93
♦7
♣852
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 4♦ 4♥ 1♠ 1NT |
EW: ♣1 ♦2 ♥1 ♠6 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
130 1.50 0.50 3♦ N 4 ♥T 2-Pratt-Mastic vs 6-Waterman-Denz
130 1.50 0.50 3♣ N 4 ♠K 4-Wainman-Roberts vs 5-Livingston-Mousley
100 0.00 2.00 3N N -2 ♠6 8-Peterson-Peterson vs 7-Elmore-Whitmore
|
28 |
♠AKQ986
♥A9
♦T932
♣Q
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
♠75
♥KT87
♦AQ86
♣A73
|
♠2
♥QJ532
♦-
♣JT98542
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ 3/2♠ 1NT ♣2 ♥2 |
EW: 4♣ 4♥ ♦3 ♠3 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
620 1.00 1.00 4♠ N 4 ♥2 4-Wainman-Roberts vs 5-Livingston-Mousley
620 1.00 1.00 4♠ N 4 ♣J 2-Pratt-Mastic vs 6-Waterman-Denz
620 1.00 1.00 4♠ N 4 ♣8 8-Peterson-Peterson vs 7-Elmore-Whitmore
|