1 |
♠T864
♥T65
♦6
♣86543
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
♠73
♥A743
♦KQJ8
♣QJ9
|
♠AK92
♥KQJ8
♦A54
♣T7
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦3 ♥1 ♠4 NT2 |
EW: 2/1♣ 4♦ 5♥ 3♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
430 4.00 0.00 3N E 4 6-Dahl-Fineberg vs 5-Hayden-Lotief
450 2.50 1.50 4♥ E 5 7-Lepscier-Quintero vs 3-Boyles-Perkinson
450 2.50 1.50 4♥ E 5 9-Coffey-Coffey vs 2-Harrington-Johnson
460 1.00 3.00 3N W 5 4-Diamond-Kinsey vs 1-Houtkooper-Hamilton
480 0.00 4.00 4♥ E 6 10-Phillips-Phillips, Jr vs 8-Callahan-Holcomb
|
2 |
♠AQ6
♥QJ8
♦QT52
♣AQ8
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
♠JT95
♥9432
♦973
♣K9
|
♠87
♥KT7
♦K64
♣J7652
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 5♦ 4♥ 5♠ 5NT |
EW: ♣2 ♦2 ♥3 ♠2 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
690 4.00 0.00 3N N 6 4-Diamond-Kinsey vs 1-Houtkooper-Hamilton
660 3.00 1.00 5N N 5 10-Phillips-Phillips, Jr vs 8-Callahan-Holcomb
630 2.00 2.00 3N S 4 9-Coffey-Coffey vs 2-Harrington-Johnson
100 1.00 3.00 6N N -1 7-Lepscier-Quintero vs 3-Boyles-Perkinson
200 0.00 4.00 6N N -2 6-Dahl-Fineberg vs 5-Hayden-Lotief
|
3 |
♠652
♥A72
♦A32
♣9843
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
♠AJT4
♥K5
♦KT754
♣72
|
♠K9873
♥T863
♦8
♣AT5
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 2♦ 2♥ 1NT ♠4 |
EW: 3♠ ♣4 ♦5 ♥5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
130 4.00 0.00 3♣ N 4 10-Phillips-Phillips, Jr vs 8-Callahan-Holcomb
90 3.00 1.00 1N N 1 4-Diamond-Kinsey vs 1-Houtkooper-Hamilton
50 2.00 2.00 1N N -1 9-Coffey-Coffey vs 2-Harrington-Johnson
90 1.00 3.00 2♦ W 2 7-Lepscier-Quintero vs 3-Boyles-Perkinson
140 0.00 4.00 2♠ E 3 6-Dahl-Fineberg vs 5-Hayden-Lotief
|
4 |
♠QJ76
♥K7
♦97
♣KJ984
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
♠932
♥AJT543
♦J643
♣-
|
♠AK5
♥-
♦AK85
♣Q76532
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1/-NT ♣6/5 ♦3 ♥4 ♠5 NT7/6 |
EW: 1♣ 4♦ 3♥ 2♠ NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 4.00 0.00 2♣ E -1 1-Houtkooper-Hamilton vs 3-Boyles-Perkinson
90 3.00 1.00 2♣ E 2 10-Phillips-Phillips, Jr vs 9-Coffey-Coffey
140 2.00 2.00 2♥ W 3 7-Lepscier-Quintero vs 6-Dahl-Fineberg
170 1.00 3.00 2♥ W 4 8-Callahan-Holcomb vs 4-Diamond-Kinsey
870 0.00 4.00 2♥* E 3 5-Hayden-Lotief vs 2-Harrington-Johnson
|
5 |
♠8
♥AK965
♦9875
♣A96
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
♠T9543
♥QT2
♦Q
♣JT32
|
♠AKQ7
♥843
♦AT63
♣84
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 4♦ 3♥ 1NT ♠6 |
EW: 1♠ ♣4 ♦3 ♥2 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
50 4.00 0.00 3♠ W -1 5-Hayden-Lotief vs 2-Harrington-Johnson
100 3.00 1.00 4♣ S -1 10-Phillips-Phillips, Jr vs 9-Coffey-Coffey
110 1.50 2.50 2♠ W 2 1-Houtkooper-Hamilton vs 3-Boyles-Perkinson
110 1.50 2.50 2♠ W 2 8-Callahan-Holcomb vs 4-Diamond-Kinsey
200 0.00 4.00 3♣ S -2 7-Lepscier-Quintero vs 6-Dahl-Fineberg
|
6 |
♠Q86
♥AT8
♦QJ98
♣QT3
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
♠T754
♥Q652
♦T762
♣4
|
♠J932
♥K3
♦K5
♣AK872
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 3♦ 3♥ 3NT ♠6 |
EW: ♣4 ♦4 ♥4 ♠6/5 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
400 4.00 0.00 3N N 3 1-Houtkooper-Hamilton vs 3-Boyles-Perkinson
200 3.00 1.00 1♣ E -2 5-Hayden-Lotief vs 2-Harrington-Johnson
150 1.50 2.50 1N N 3 7-Lepscier-Quintero vs 6-Dahl-Fineberg
150 1.50 2.50 1N N 3 10-Phillips-Phillips, Jr vs 9-Coffey-Coffey
110 0.00 4.00 1♦ N 3 8-Callahan-Holcomb vs 4-Diamond-Kinsey
|
7 |
♠-
♥KJ94
♦AQJ6
♣KQ643
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
♠AJ9
♥AT6
♦75
♣AJ952
|
♠Q632
♥Q853
♦K983
♣T
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6 ♦6 ♥5 ♠6/5 NT5 |
EW: 1♣ -/1♦ 2♥ 1♠ 1/2NT ♦6/7 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 3.50 0.50 1N W -1 8-Callahan-Holcomb vs 7-Lepscier-Quintero
100 3.50 0.50 3♥ E -1 9-Coffey-Coffey vs 5-Hayden-Lotief
110 2.00 2.00 2♥ E 2 6-Dahl-Fineberg vs 3-Boyles-Perkinson
200 0.50 3.50 3N N -2 10-Phillips-Phillips, Jr vs 1-Houtkooper-Hamilton
200 0.50 3.50 3♣ N -2 2-Harrington-Johnson vs 4-Diamond-Kinsey
|
8 |
♠962
♥QJ93
♦Q74
♣Q85
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
♠AJ83
♥6
♦J965
♣K976
|
♠T4
♥AT75
♦AKT
♣JT43
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦3/4 ♥6/5 ♠4 NT5 |
EW: 4♣ 3♦ 1♥ 3♠ 2NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
50 4.00 0.00 3♦ E -1 9-Coffey-Coffey vs 5-Hayden-Lotief
50 3.00 1.00 3♥ N -1 6-Dahl-Fineberg vs 3-Boyles-Perkinson
100 2.00 2.00 2♥* N -1 10-Phillips-Phillips, Jr vs 1-Houtkooper-Hamilton
110 1.00 3.00 3♣ E 3 2-Harrington-Johnson vs 4-Diamond-Kinsey
150 0.00 4.00 2♥ S -3 8-Callahan-Holcomb vs 7-Lepscier-Quintero
|
9 |
♠KJ8
♥KQJT93
♦85
♣J4
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
♠Q962
♥76
♦AQ
♣AKQ76
|
♠743
♥A
♦T976432
♣T9
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♥ ♣4 ♦1 ♠4 NT2/4 |
EW: 3♣ 4♦ 2♠ ♥5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
200 4.00 0.00 5♣ W -2 2-Harrington-Johnson vs 4-Diamond-Kinsey
50 2.50 1.50 3♥ N -1 9-Coffey-Coffey vs 5-Hayden-Lotief
50 2.50 1.50 3♥ N -1 10-Phillips-Phillips, Jr vs 1-Houtkooper-Hamilton
150 1.00 3.00 4♦ E 5 6-Dahl-Fineberg vs 3-Boyles-Perkinson
500 0.00 4.00 5♥* N -3 8-Callahan-Holcomb vs 7-Lepscier-Quintero
|
10 |
♠QJ64
♥A92
♦QT43
♣Q8
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
♠75
♥T64
♦87
♣JT9652
|
♠AKT93
♥K753
♦A2
♣43
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ 1/-♠ 3/2NT ♣6/5 ♥6 ♠7/6 |
EW: 1♣ ♦4 ♥6 ♠6 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
630 4.00 0.00 3N N 4 10-Phillips-Phillips, Jr vs 2-Harrington-Johnson
110 3.00 1.00 3♦ S 3 9-Coffey-Coffey vs 8-Callahan-Holcomb
100 1.50 2.50 3♦ S -1 1-Houtkooper-Hamilton vs 6-Dahl-Fineberg
100 1.50 2.50 3♦ S -1 7-Lepscier-Quintero vs 4-Diamond-Kinsey
500 0.00 4.00 5♦* S -2 3-Boyles-Perkinson vs 5-Hayden-Lotief
|
11 |
♠K7643
♥53
♦JT65
♣T8
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
♠QJ95
♥Q
♦9872
♣K642
|
♠8
♥842
♦AQ43
♣Q9753
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♥ 3♠ 4NT ♣4 ♦5 |
EW: 2♣ 2♦ ♥3 ♠3 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
450 3.50 0.50 4♥ S 5 3-Boyles-Perkinson vs 5-Hayden-Lotief
450 3.50 0.50 4♥ S 5 9-Coffey-Coffey vs 8-Callahan-Holcomb
420 2.00 2.00 4♥ S 4 1-Houtkooper-Hamilton vs 6-Dahl-Fineberg
140 1.00 3.00 1♥ S 3 7-Lepscier-Quintero vs 4-Diamond-Kinsey
150 0.00 4.00 6♥ S -3 10-Phillips-Phillips, Jr vs 2-Harrington-Johnson
|
12 |
♠KQ92
♥QJ983
♦5
♣A97
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
♠J753
♥K54
♦A72
♣T52
|
♠A86
♥7
♦KQT93
♣Q843
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♥ 1♠ ♣6 ♦6 NT6 |
EW: 1♦ 1NT ♣6 ♥3 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
620 3.50 0.50 4♥ N 4 7-Lepscier-Quintero vs 4-Diamond-Kinsey
620 3.50 0.50 4♥ N 4 10-Phillips-Phillips, Jr vs 2-Harrington-Johnson
200 2.00 2.00 4♣ W -4 9-Coffey-Coffey vs 8-Callahan-Holcomb
170 1.00 3.00 3♥ N 4 3-Boyles-Perkinson vs 5-Hayden-Lotief
140 0.00 4.00 3♥ N 3 1-Houtkooper-Hamilton vs 6-Dahl-Fineberg
|
13 |
♠K85
♥A97654
♦AT3
♣5
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
♠QJ3
♥2
♦K942
♣J8632
|
♠A64
♥QT
♦Q85
♣AKT97
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♥ 1♠ ♣3 ♦4 NT6 |
EW: 4♣ 2♦ ♥4 ♠5/6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 3.50 0.50 5♣ E -1 4-Diamond-Kinsey vs 6-Dahl-Fineberg
100 3.50 0.50 4♣ E -1 1-Houtkooper-Hamilton vs 9-Coffey-Coffey
130 1.50 2.50 4♣ E 4 2-Harrington-Johnson vs 7-Lepscier-Quintero
130 1.50 2.50 3♣ S 4 8-Callahan-Holcomb vs 5-Hayden-Lotief
750 0.00 4.00 5♣* E 5 10-Phillips-Phillips, Jr vs 3-Boyles-Perkinson
|
14 |
♠J965
♥K952
♦QJ
♣Q82
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
♠743
♥QT86
♦K93
♣T64
|
♠AKQ2
♥J4
♦A8652
♣AK
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6 ♦3 ♥5/4 ♠4 NT4 |
EW: 1♣ 4♦ 2♥ 3♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
50 4.00 0.00 5♦ E -1 10-Phillips-Phillips, Jr vs 3-Boyles-Perkinson
130 3.00 1.00 1♦ E 4 1-Houtkooper-Hamilton vs 9-Coffey-Coffey
140 2.00 2.00 1♠ E 3 8-Callahan-Holcomb vs 5-Hayden-Lotief
400 1.00 3.00 3N E 3 2-Harrington-Johnson vs 7-Lepscier-Quintero
460 0.00 4.00 3N E 5 4-Diamond-Kinsey vs 6-Dahl-Fineberg
|
15 |
♠Q874
♥K3
♦QJ964
♣A3
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
♠53
♥AQ98
♦AKT
♣K842
|
♠96
♥J752
♦753
♣QJT6
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ 3♠ 1NT ♣5 ♥5 |
EW: 1/2♣ 2♥ ♦4 ♠4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
170 3.50 0.50 2♠ S 4 2-Harrington-Johnson vs 7-Lepscier-Quintero
170 3.50 0.50 2♠ S 4 10-Phillips-Phillips, Jr vs 3-Boyles-Perkinson
130 2.00 2.00 2♦ N 4 4-Diamond-Kinsey vs 6-Dahl-Fineberg
50 1.00 3.00 1N W -1 8-Callahan-Holcomb vs 5-Hayden-Lotief
150 0.00 4.00 1N W 3 1-Houtkooper-Hamilton vs 9-Coffey-Coffey
|
16 |
♠65
♥AT74
♦K943
♣876
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
♠AQ8743
♥Q65
♦A
♣K42
|
♠-
♥J932
♦JT87
♣AQJ95
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦6 ♥4 ♠5 NT4 |
EW: 3♣ 1♦ 3♥ 2♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
200 3.50 0.50 3♠ W -2 2-Harrington-Johnson vs 1-Houtkooper-Hamilton
200 3.50 0.50 2♠ W -2 10-Phillips-Phillips, Jr vs 4-Diamond-Kinsey
100 1.50 2.50 3♠ W -1 9-Coffey-Coffey vs 6-Dahl-Fineberg
100 1.50 2.50 2♠ W -1 3-Boyles-Perkinson vs 8-Callahan-Holcomb
110 0.00 4.00 2♠ W 2 5-Hayden-Lotief vs 7-Lepscier-Quintero
|
17 |
♠A8
♥86
♦8763
♣AJT64
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
♠J643
♥QJ73
♦KT5
♣53
|
♠Q2
♥A42
♦AQJ94
♣K82
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ ♦4 ♥5 ♠6 NT4 |
EW: 3♦ 1♥ 1NT ♣4 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
50 4.00 0.00 3♦ E -1 10-Phillips-Phillips, Jr vs 4-Diamond-Kinsey
50 2.50 1.50 3♠ N -1 5-Hayden-Lotief vs 7-Lepscier-Quintero
50 2.50 1.50 2♠ N -1 9-Coffey-Coffey vs 6-Dahl-Fineberg
90 1.00 3.00 2♦ E 2 2-Harrington-Johnson vs 1-Houtkooper-Hamilton
120 0.00 4.00 1N E 2 3-Boyles-Perkinson vs 8-Callahan-Holcomb
|
18 |
♠Q53
♥-
♦QT543
♣KJT97
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
♠98642
♥AQJ63
♦J
♣62
|
♠AKJ
♥KT87542
♦K87
♣-
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 5/4♦ ♥1 ♠2/1 NT1 |
EW: 6♥ 4♠ ♣1 ♦2 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
450 4.00 0.00 5♥ E 5 5-Hayden-Lotief vs 7-Lepscier-Quintero
480 2.00 2.00 5♥ E 6 3-Boyles-Perkinson vs 8-Callahan-Holcomb
480 2.00 2.00 4♥ E 6 2-Harrington-Johnson vs 1-Houtkooper-Hamilton
480 2.00 2.00 4♥ E 6 9-Coffey-Coffey vs 6-Dahl-Fineberg
1210 0.00 4.00 6♥* E 6 10-Phillips-Phillips, Jr vs 4-Diamond-Kinsey
|
19 |
♠874
♥AT73
♦K842
♣94
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
♠QT965
♥52
♦T63
♣KQ7
|
♠A2
♥J64
♦AQJ97
♣863
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 3/2♥ ♦5/4 ♠5 NT5 |
EW: 2♦ 1♠ 1NT ♣5 ♥4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
140 4.00 0.00 2♥ N 3 3-Boyles-Perkinson vs 2-Harrington-Johnson
50 2.00 2.00 3♥ S -1 4-Diamond-Kinsey vs 9-Coffey-Coffey
50 2.00 2.00 3♥ N -1 1-Houtkooper-Hamilton vs 7-Lepscier-Quintero
50 2.00 2.00 3♥ N -1 6-Dahl-Fineberg vs 8-Callahan-Holcomb
100 0.00 4.00 3♥ S -2 10-Phillips-Phillips, Jr vs 5-Hayden-Lotief
|
20 |
♠Q964
♥KT97
♦863
♣Q5
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
♠KJ2
♥A6
♦KT4
♣J8632
|
♠AT853
♥Q54
♦A72
♣KT
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦4 ♥5 ♠2 NT3/2 |
EW: 4♣ 3/2♦ 2/1♥ 5♠ 5/4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 4.00 0.00 4♠ E -1 3-Boyles-Perkinson vs 2-Harrington-Johnson
170 3.00 1.00 3♠ E 4 10-Phillips-Phillips, Jr vs 5-Hayden-Lotief
620 1.50 2.50 4♠ E 4 1-Houtkooper-Hamilton vs 7-Lepscier-Quintero
620 1.50 2.50 4♠ E 4 4-Diamond-Kinsey vs 9-Coffey-Coffey
630 0.00 4.00 3N W 4 6-Dahl-Fineberg vs 8-Callahan-Holcomb
|
21 |
♠AK952
♥K65
♦AK5
♣J5
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
♠J
♥AT9
♦9632
♣AT742
|
♠Q86
♥74
♦QJT
♣KQ983
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♥ 3♠ ♣4 ♦6 NT6 |
EW: 3♣ 1♦ 1NT ♥3 ♠3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
170 4.00 0.00 3♠ N 4 3-Boyles-Perkinson vs 2-Harrington-Johnson
140 2.50 1.50 3♠ N 3 4-Diamond-Kinsey vs 9-Coffey-Coffey
140 2.50 1.50 1♠ N 3 10-Phillips-Phillips, Jr vs 5-Hayden-Lotief
100 0.50 3.50 5♣* E -1 1-Houtkooper-Hamilton vs 7-Lepscier-Quintero
100 0.50 3.50 5♣* E -1 6-Dahl-Fineberg vs 8-Callahan-Holcomb
|
22 |
♠J87
♥AT84
♦KJT43
♣J
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
♠A
♥KQJ753
♦Q
♣AQT63
|
♠52
♥2
♦87652
♣98752
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 4♠ -/2NT ♣2 ♥3/4 NT5/8 |
EW: 4♣ 2♥ ♦2 ♠2 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
800 3.88 0.13 7♣* W -3 4-Diamond-Kinsey vs 3-Boyles-Perkinson
690 2.63 1.38 4♠* S 5 2-Harrington-Johnson vs 8-Callahan-Holcomb
AVE- AVE+ 1.60 2.40 Pass Out 5-Hayden-Lotief vs 1-Houtkooper-Hamilton
420 1.38 2.63 4♠ S 4 7-Lepscier-Quintero vs 9-Coffey-Coffey
790 0.13 3.88 4♥* W 4 10-Phillips-Phillips, Jr vs 6-Dahl-Fineberg
|
23 |
♠AQJ82
♥KT7542
♦-
♣T6
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
♠T743
♥A3
♦AKQ5
♣AKQ
|
♠65
♥9
♦JT87643
♣J92
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♥ 1♠ ♣6 ♦2 NT2 |
EW: 5♦ 2NT ♣6 ♥3 ♠3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
1070 4.00 0.00 2♠* N 4 4-Diamond-Kinsey vs 3-Boyles-Perkinson
790 2.50 1.50 4♥* S 4 10-Phillips-Phillips, Jr vs 6-Dahl-Fineberg
790 2.50 1.50 4♥* N 4 2-Harrington-Johnson vs 8-Callahan-Holcomb
100 1.00 3.00 5♥ N -1 5-Hayden-Lotief vs 1-Houtkooper-Hamilton
150 0.00 4.00 4♦ E 5 7-Lepscier-Quintero vs 9-Coffey-Coffey
|
24 |
♠542
♥AJ
♦AQJT7
♣AQ6
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
♠JT
♥98765
♦9
♣T8543
|
♠763
♥QT32
♦K854
♣J2
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 6♦ 1♥ 6♠ 6NT |
EW: ♣3 ♦1 ♥6 ♠1 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
990 3.50 0.50 6N N 6 2-Harrington-Johnson vs 8-Callahan-Holcomb
990 3.50 0.50 6N N 6 4-Diamond-Kinsey vs 3-Boyles-Perkinson
980 2.00 2.00 6♠ N 6 10-Phillips-Phillips, Jr vs 6-Dahl-Fineberg
490 0.50 3.50 3N N 6 5-Hayden-Lotief vs 1-Houtkooper-Hamilton
490 0.50 3.50 3N N 6 7-Lepscier-Quintero vs 9-Coffey-Coffey
|
25 |
♠K983
♥53
♦Q853
♣K72
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
♠52
♥T874
♦J962
♣A94
|
♠T764
♥KJ92
♦T7
♣QJ8
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 4♦ 2♥ 4♠ 4NT |
EW: ♣2 ♦3 ♥5 ♠2 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
460 4.00 0.00 3N S 5 10-Phillips-Phillips, Jr vs 7-Lepscier-Quintero
430 2.00 2.00 3N S 4 3-Boyles-Perkinson vs 9-Coffey-Coffey
430 2.00 2.00 3N S 4 5-Hayden-Lotief vs 4-Diamond-Kinsey
430 2.00 2.00 3N S 4 6-Dahl-Fineberg vs 2-Harrington-Johnson
400 0.00 4.00 3N S 3 8-Callahan-Holcomb vs 1-Houtkooper-Hamilton
|
26 |
♠T943
♥Q96
♦876
♣KQ5
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
♠J7
♥KJ4
♦AJT953
♣32
|
♠AK852
♥85
♦Q
♣JT874
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ ♣6 ♦5 ♠6 NT5 |
EW: 1♣ 2♦ 1♠ ♥5/6 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 3.50 0.50 3♦ W -1 5-Hayden-Lotief vs 4-Diamond-Kinsey
100 3.50 0.50 3♦ W -1 10-Phillips-Phillips, Jr vs 7-Lepscier-Quintero
100 2.00 2.00 2♥ S -1 6-Dahl-Fineberg vs 2-Harrington-Johnson
110 0.50 3.50 3♦ W 3 3-Boyles-Perkinson vs 9-Coffey-Coffey
110 0.50 3.50 3♦ W 3 8-Callahan-Holcomb vs 1-Houtkooper-Hamilton
|
27 |
♠K54
♥7642
♦T7
♣KQ87
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
♠JT
♥J9853
♦Q5
♣AJ43
|
♠8763
♥Q
♦K98432
♣52
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 2♦ 3♥ 5♠ 5NT |
EW: ♣2 ♦5 ♥4 ♠2 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
460 3.50 0.50 3N S 5 10-Phillips-Phillips, Jr vs 7-Lepscier-Quintero
460 3.50 0.50 3N N 5 6-Dahl-Fineberg vs 2-Harrington-Johnson
430 2.00 2.00 3N S 4 3-Boyles-Perkinson vs 9-Coffey-Coffey
400 1.00 3.00 3N S 3 5-Hayden-Lotief vs 4-Diamond-Kinsey
100 0.00 4.00 4♥ N -2 8-Callahan-Holcomb vs 1-Houtkooper-Hamilton
|