1 |
♠KJ87632
♥42
♦4
♣QJT
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
♠AQ9
♥J7
♦A972
♣A532
|
♠T4
♥AQ653
♦T65
♣K84
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♠ ♣4/5 ♦5 ♥4/5 NT4/5 |
EW: 2♣ 2♦ 2♥ 2NT ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
150 4.00 0.00 2-Sopher-Benson vs 3-Hayden-Diamond
50 2.50 1.50 1-Halloran-Rhoden vs 1-Dahl-Lotief
50 2.50 1.50 4-Huckabay-Smith vs 2-Coffey-Coffey
100 1.00 3.00 3-Vasilevsky-Crawford vs 5-Lepscier-Boyles
200 0.00 4.00 5-Woelk-Keene vs 4-Harrington-Johnson
|
2 |
♠K654
♥K9832
♦4
♣AT9
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
♠JT9732
♥4
♦853
♣653
|
♠A8
♥AJ75
♦QT92
♣QJ8
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 2♦ 5♥ 1♠ 4NT |
EW: ♣3 ♦4/3 ♥2 ♠6 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
300 4.00 0.00 5-Woelk-Keene vs 4-Harrington-Johnson
170 2.50 1.50 1-Halloran-Rhoden vs 1-Dahl-Lotief
170 2.50 1.50 2-Sopher-Benson vs 3-Hayden-Diamond
150 1.00 3.00 4-Huckabay-Smith vs 2-Coffey-Coffey
140 0.00 4.00 3-Vasilevsky-Crawford vs 5-Lepscier-Boyles
|
3 |
♠AT865
♥J4
♦Q6
♣AKJ4
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
♠Q4
♥T8
♦A972
♣87632
|
♠KJ3
♥Q7652
♦85
♣T95
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 5♦ 3♥ 4♠ 5NT |
EW: ♣3 ♦1 ♥4 ♠3 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
490 4.00 0.00 2-Sopher-Benson vs 3-Hayden-Diamond
460 3.00 1.00 3-Vasilevsky-Crawford vs 5-Lepscier-Boyles
430 2.00 2.00 4-Huckabay-Smith vs 2-Coffey-Coffey
420 1.00 3.00 5-Woelk-Keene vs 4-Harrington-Johnson
170 0.00 4.00 1-Halloran-Rhoden vs 1-Dahl-Lotief
|
4 |
♠985
♥Q3
♦QT52
♣KJ43
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
♠KQJ76
♥762
♦K7
♣T62
|
♠A3
♥AKJ85
♦AJ94
♣AQ
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣2 ♦1 ♥0 ♠0 NT0 |
EW: 5♣ 6♦ 7♥ 7♠ 7NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
710 2.50 1.50 1-Halloran-Rhoden vs 1-Dahl-Lotief
710 2.50 1.50 2-Sopher-Benson vs 3-Hayden-Diamond
710 2.50 1.50 4-Huckabay-Smith vs 2-Coffey-Coffey
710 2.50 1.50 5-Woelk-Keene vs 4-Harrington-Johnson
1470 0.00 4.00 3-Vasilevsky-Crawford vs 5-Lepscier-Boyles
|
5 |
♠AKT5
♥J95
♦K832
♣74
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
♠9764
♥K32
♦JT
♣T932
|
♠QJ82
♥Q84
♦A64
♣K86
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 5♦ 4♥ 2♠ 4/3NT |
EW: ♣4/3 ♦2 ♥3/2 ♠5 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
660 3.50 0.50 1-Halloran-Rhoden vs 1-Dahl-Lotief
660 3.50 0.50 3-Vasilevsky-Crawford vs 5-Lepscier-Boyles
150 2.00 2.00 5-Woelk-Keene vs 4-Harrington-Johnson
120 1.00 3.00 2-Sopher-Benson vs 3-Hayden-Diamond
110 0.00 4.00 4-Huckabay-Smith vs 2-Coffey-Coffey
|
6 |
♠AJT7
♥AKJ3
♦K97
♣T8
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
♠9
♥Q752
♦Q85
♣AK732
|
♠KQ865
♥T8
♦J632
♣Q6
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♥ 1♠ 1NT ♦6 |
EW: -/1♦ ♣6 ♦6/7 ♥5/6 ♠6 NT5/6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
150 4.00 0.00 5-Woelk-Keene vs 3-Hayden-Diamond
120 3.00 1.00 1-Halloran-Rhoden vs 5-Lepscier-Boyles
100 2.00 2.00 2-Sopher-Benson vs 2-Coffey-Coffey
90 1.00 3.00 4-Huckabay-Smith vs 1-Dahl-Lotief
50 0.00 4.00 3-Vasilevsky-Crawford vs 4-Harrington-Johnson
|
7 |
♠AKQ
♥9652
♦J
♣KQJ54
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
♠85
♥T843
♦Q872
♣732
|
♠JT742
♥-
♦KT654
♣A86
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 6/5♣ 6♥ 2♠ 3NT ♦5 |
EW: 2♦ ♣1 ♥1 ♠4 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
1430 4.00 0.00 2-Sopher-Benson vs 2-Coffey-Coffey
680 2.00 2.00 1-Halloran-Rhoden vs 5-Lepscier-Boyles
680 2.00 2.00 3-Vasilevsky-Crawford vs 4-Harrington-Johnson
680 2.00 2.00 4-Huckabay-Smith vs 1-Dahl-Lotief
650 0.00 4.00 5-Woelk-Keene vs 3-Hayden-Diamond
|
8 |
♠T85
♥Q9753
♦AQ3
♣94
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
♠A9
♥KJT
♦KJT
♣AT853
|
♠K42
♥62
♦98652
♣KJ2
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ 1♠ ♣4 ♦3 NT5 |
EW: 3♣ 4♦ 2NT ♥6 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
110 4.00 0.00 5-Woelk-Keene vs 3-Hayden-Diamond
50 2.00 2.00 2-Sopher-Benson vs 2-Coffey-Coffey
50 2.00 2.00 3-Vasilevsky-Crawford vs 4-Harrington-Johnson
50 2.00 2.00 4-Huckabay-Smith vs 1-Dahl-Lotief
90 0.00 4.00 1-Halloran-Rhoden vs 5-Lepscier-Boyles
|
9 |
♠75
♥AQJ
♦Q643
♣KT92
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
♠KQ9864
♥9762
♦KT7
♣-
|
♠AJT3
♥T85
♦2
♣QJ753
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 3/4♦ 1♥ ♠4 NT6 |
EW: 3♠ 1NT ♣4 ♦3 ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
130 3.50 0.50 2-Sopher-Benson vs 2-Coffey-Coffey
130 3.50 0.50 3-Vasilevsky-Crawford vs 4-Harrington-Johnson
100 1.50 2.50 1-Halloran-Rhoden vs 5-Lepscier-Boyles
100 1.50 2.50 4-Huckabay-Smith vs 1-Dahl-Lotief
930 0.00 4.00 5-Woelk-Keene vs 3-Hayden-Diamond
|
10 |
♠AT5
♥653
♦AK98
♣KT8
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
♠64
♥J2
♦JT72
♣AQJ42
|
♠KQ83
♥KQ4
♦Q654
♣93
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♥ 1♠ ♣6 ♦5 NT6 |
EW: 2♦ ♣6 ♥5 ♠5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
120 4.00 0.00 3-Vasilevsky-Crawford vs 4-Harrington-Johnson
100 3.00 1.00 2-Sopher-Benson vs 2-Coffey-Coffey
180 2.00 2.00 1-Halloran-Rhoden vs 5-Lepscier-Boyles
200 0.50 3.50 4-Huckabay-Smith vs 1-Dahl-Lotief
200 0.50 3.50 5-Woelk-Keene vs 3-Hayden-Diamond
|
11 |
♠Q82
♥QJ43
♦Q
♣KQJ95
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
♠96
♥75
♦KJ8653
♣A64
|
♠JT54
♥A62
♦AT2
♣T72
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 4♥ 2♠ ♦5 NT5 |
EW: 2♦ 2NT ♣3 ♥3 ♠4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
420 3.50 0.50 1-Halloran-Rhoden vs 4-Harrington-Johnson
420 3.50 0.50 2-Sopher-Benson vs 1-Dahl-Lotief
140 2.00 2.00 5-Woelk-Keene vs 2-Coffey-Coffey
100 1.00 3.00 3-Vasilevsky-Crawford vs 3-Hayden-Diamond
110 0.00 4.00 4-Huckabay-Smith vs 5-Lepscier-Boyles
|
12 |
♠Q8
♥AK96432
♦A
♣986
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
♠KJ4
♥QJT
♦J9742
♣Q3
|
♠A95
♥75
♦KQ63
♣7542
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 4♥ 3♠ 1NT ♦5 |
EW: 2♦ ♣4 ♥3 ♠4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
170 4.00 0.00 3-Vasilevsky-Crawford vs 3-Hayden-Diamond
140 3.00 1.00 5-Woelk-Keene vs 2-Coffey-Coffey
100 1.50 2.50 2-Sopher-Benson vs 1-Dahl-Lotief
100 1.50 2.50 4-Huckabay-Smith vs 5-Lepscier-Boyles
400 0.00 4.00 1-Halloran-Rhoden vs 4-Harrington-Johnson
|
13 |
♠965
♥K9
♦JT972
♣AT7
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
♠AJ32
♥A64
♦64
♣K965
|
♠QT74
♥875
♦AK85
♣Q2
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5/4 ♦5 ♥5 ♠3 NT4 |
EW: 2♣ 2♦ 2♥ 4♠ 2NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
100 4.00 0.00 5-Woelk-Keene vs 2-Coffey-Coffey
140 2.50 1.50 1-Halloran-Rhoden vs 4-Harrington-Johnson
140 2.50 1.50 4-Huckabay-Smith vs 5-Lepscier-Boyles
170 0.50 3.50 2-Sopher-Benson vs 1-Dahl-Lotief
170 0.50 3.50 3-Vasilevsky-Crawford vs 3-Hayden-Diamond
|
14 |
♠JT875
♥43
♦AKJ642
♣-
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
♠Q964
♥8
♦97
♣T87543
|
♠3
♥AKQJT2
♦853
♣AQ9
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♦ 3♠ ♣3 ♥6 NT6 |
EW: 2♣ 1♥ ♦3 ♠3 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
420 4.00 0.00 2-Sopher-Benson vs 1-Dahl-Lotief
300 2.50 1.50 3-Vasilevsky-Crawford vs 3-Hayden-Diamond
300 2.50 1.50 5-Woelk-Keene vs 2-Coffey-Coffey
130 1.00 3.00 4-Huckabay-Smith vs 5-Lepscier-Boyles
110 0.00 4.00 1-Halloran-Rhoden vs 4-Harrington-Johnson
|
15 |
♠KJ95
♥J982
♦AQ2
♣JT
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
♠86
♥KQT4
♦865
♣K972
|
♠AQ732
♥A76
♦KT
♣A65
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦5 ♥2 ♠4/3 NT4 |
EW: 4♣ 2♦ 4♥ 3♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
50 4.00 0.00 3-Vasilevsky-Crawford vs 3-Hayden-Diamond
100 3.00 1.00 2-Sopher-Benson vs 1-Dahl-Lotief
110 2.00 2.00 1-Halloran-Rhoden vs 4-Harrington-Johnson
170 1.00 3.00 5-Woelk-Keene vs 2-Coffey-Coffey
630 0.00 4.00 4-Huckabay-Smith vs 5-Lepscier-Boyles
|
16 |
♠T
♥J9
♦742
♣KQT9542
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
♠A86432
♥T6
♦65
♣J76
|
♠J95
♥K875432
♦A3
♣8
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 4♦ 4NT ♥5 ♠6 |
EW: 1♥ 1♠ ♣2 ♦2 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
490 4.00 0.00 1-Halloran-Rhoden vs 3-Hayden-Diamond
460 3.00 1.00 3-Vasilevsky-Crawford vs 2-Coffey-Coffey
400 2.00 2.00 2-Sopher-Benson vs 5-Lepscier-Boyles
170 1.00 3.00 4-Huckabay-Smith vs 4-Harrington-Johnson
100 0.00 4.00 5-Woelk-Keene vs 1-Dahl-Lotief
|
17 |
♠9
♥KQJ7
♦KT65
♣J742
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
♠T762
♥93
♦QJ98
♣AT8
|
♠AKQ54
♥AT
♦73
♣KQ63
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♥ ♣3 ♦5 ♠2 NT3 |
EW: 4♣ 1♦ 4♠ 4NT ♥5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
450 2.00 2.00 1-Halloran-Rhoden vs 3-Hayden-Diamond
450 2.00 2.00 2-Sopher-Benson vs 5-Lepscier-Boyles
450 2.00 2.00 3-Vasilevsky-Crawford vs 2-Coffey-Coffey
450 2.00 2.00 4-Huckabay-Smith vs 4-Harrington-Johnson
450 2.00 2.00 5-Woelk-Keene vs 1-Dahl-Lotief
|
18 |
♠854
♥KT82
♦Q54
♣KJ3
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
♠QT7
♥A75
♦3
♣Q87654
|
♠K962
♥Q6
♦T8762
♣T9
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 4♥ 2♠ 3NT ♣6 |
EW: 1♣ ♦4 ♥3 ♠5 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
620 3.50 0.50 2-Sopher-Benson vs 5-Lepscier-Boyles
620 3.50 0.50 3-Vasilevsky-Crawford vs 2-Coffey-Coffey
100 2.00 2.00 4-Huckabay-Smith vs 4-Harrington-Johnson
100 0.50 3.50 1-Halloran-Rhoden vs 3-Hayden-Diamond
100 0.50 3.50 5-Woelk-Keene vs 1-Dahl-Lotief
|
19 |
♠J8
♥Q3
♦T652
♣J8532
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
♠AT76432
♥AK8
♦K94
♣-
|
♠-
♥JT9764
♦3
♣KT9764
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ ♣5 ♥2/1 ♠5 NT5 |
EW: 2♣ 5♥ 2♠ 2NT ♦4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
500 4.00 0.00 2-Sopher-Benson vs 5-Lepscier-Boyles
200 2.00 2.00 1-Halloran-Rhoden vs 3-Hayden-Diamond
200 2.00 2.00 3-Vasilevsky-Crawford vs 2-Coffey-Coffey
200 2.00 2.00 4-Huckabay-Smith vs 4-Harrington-Johnson
100 0.00 4.00 5-Woelk-Keene vs 1-Dahl-Lotief
|
20 |
♠A
♥5432
♦J6
♣AQ9765
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
♠KT73
♥QT87
♦Q7
♣KJ3
|
♠J9864
♥AJ
♦AK985
♣T
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ ♦4 ♥5 ♠3 NT4 |
EW: 3♦ 2♥ 4♠ 1/3NT ♣6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
140 3.50 0.50 3-Vasilevsky-Crawford vs 2-Coffey-Coffey
140 3.50 0.50 5-Woelk-Keene vs 1-Dahl-Lotief
170 2.00 2.00 1-Halloran-Rhoden vs 3-Hayden-Diamond
620 1.00 3.00 2-Sopher-Benson vs 5-Lepscier-Boyles
650 0.00 4.00 4-Huckabay-Smith vs 4-Harrington-Johnson
|
21 |
♠AQT8
♥QT753
♦AQ53
♣-
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
♠J54
♥-
♦T98642
♣J942
|
♠K76
♥A982
♦KJ7
♣AKT
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♥ 2♠ 2NT ♣5/6 ♦4 |
EW: 1♣ 3♦ ♥3/2 ♠5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
620 4.00 0.00 3-Vasilevsky-Crawford vs 1-Dahl-Lotief
300 3.00 1.00 5-Woelk-Keene vs 5-Lepscier-Boyles
200 2.00 2.00 4-Huckabay-Smith vs 3-Hayden-Diamond
200 1.00 3.00 1-Halloran-Rhoden vs 2-Coffey-Coffey
800 0.00 4.00 2-Sopher-Benson vs 4-Harrington-Johnson
|
22 |
♠9653
♥8764
♦4
♣QT32
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
♠2
♥J2
♦986532
♣9875
|
♠AQJ87
♥KQT
♦QJ
♣AKJ
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦4 ♥5 ♠5 NT6 |
EW: 2♣ 3♦ 2♠ 1/-NT ♥6 NT7/6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
200 4.00 0.00 5-Woelk-Keene vs 5-Lepscier-Boyles
100 3.00 1.00 4-Huckabay-Smith vs 3-Hayden-Diamond
110 2.00 2.00 2-Sopher-Benson vs 4-Harrington-Johnson
140 0.50 3.50 1-Halloran-Rhoden vs 2-Coffey-Coffey
140 0.50 3.50 3-Vasilevsky-Crawford vs 1-Dahl-Lotief
|
23 |
♠A6
♥T5
♦KT8432
♣A95
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
♠Q2
♥AK863
♦Q65
♣J74
|
♠KJ543
♥7
♦J9
♣KT632
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 2♥ 1NT ♣5 ♠6 |
EW: 1♣ ♦5 ♥5 ♠6 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
200 4.00 0.00 1-Halloran-Rhoden vs 2-Coffey-Coffey
130 2.50 1.50 2-Sopher-Benson vs 4-Harrington-Johnson
130 2.50 1.50 3-Vasilevsky-Crawford vs 1-Dahl-Lotief
100 1.00 3.00 4-Huckabay-Smith vs 3-Hayden-Diamond
110 0.00 4.00 5-Woelk-Keene vs 5-Lepscier-Boyles
|
24 |
♠KT
♥T8643
♦Q94
♣432
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
♠Q9732
♥5
♦J82
♣A986
|
♠65
♥AJ972
♦AT
♣QJT7
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ ♣4 ♥5 ♠5 NT5 |
EW: 3♣ 1/2♥ 1♠ ♦5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
100 4.00 0.00 1-Halloran-Rhoden vs 2-Coffey-Coffey
50 2.50 1.50 3-Vasilevsky-Crawford vs 1-Dahl-Lotief
50 2.50 1.50 4-Huckabay-Smith vs 3-Hayden-Diamond
110 1.00 3.00 2-Sopher-Benson vs 4-Harrington-Johnson
120 0.00 4.00 5-Woelk-Keene vs 5-Lepscier-Boyles
|
25 |
♠T8
♥QJ2
♦876
♣AK743
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
♠AJ43
♥AT98
♦542
♣95
|
♠Q97
♥K7653
♦J3
♣QT8
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 3♦ 1♠ 1NT ♥5 |
EW: 2♥ ♣4 ♦4 ♠6 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
460 4.00 0.00 2-Sopher-Benson vs 4-Harrington-Johnson
130 2.50 1.50 1-Halloran-Rhoden vs 2-Coffey-Coffey
130 2.50 1.50 3-Vasilevsky-Crawford vs 1-Dahl-Lotief
110 1.00 3.00 5-Woelk-Keene vs 5-Lepscier-Boyles
90 0.00 4.00 4-Huckabay-Smith vs 3-Hayden-Diamond
|