1 |
♠KQ987
♥T754
♦J54
♣9
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
♠AT63
♥A
♦62
♣KQJ542
|
♠J42
♥Q963
♦KT97
♣A6
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ ♣4 ♦6 ♠5 NT4 |
EW: 3♣ 2♠ 3NT ♦6 ♥5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
110 3.00 0.00 2♥ S 5-Gugick-Sullivan vs 6-Naschold-Joerger
100 2.00 1.00 3N E -2 3-Nadler-Nadler vs 7-Barrett-Micone
50 1.00 2.00 3♥ S -1 2-Gallagher-Devine vs 4-Rodzach-Smith
400 0.00 3.00 3N E 8-Shifrin-Barsky vs 1-Marquardt-Wood
|
2 |
♠AT63
♥9742
♦T6
♣K53
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
♠KJ2
♥K83
♦K74
♣QJ64
|
♠Q
♥AQ65
♦Q532
♣AT97
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣2 ♦4 ♥3 ♠6 NT3 |
EW: 5♣ 3♦ 4♥ 1♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
430 3.00 0.00 3N W +1 8-Shifrin-Barsky vs 1-Marquardt-Wood
460 1.00 2.00 3N W +2 2-Gallagher-Devine vs 4-Rodzach-Smith
460 1.00 2.00 3N W +2 3-Nadler-Nadler vs 7-Barrett-Micone
460 1.00 2.00 3N W +2 5-Gugick-Sullivan vs 6-Naschold-Joerger
|
3 |
♠QT62
♥J83
♦A65
♣J92
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
♠K73
♥KQ976
♦T74
♣Q6
|
♠94
♥52
♦J9832
♣K875
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2/3♣ 1/2♥ 4♠ 3NT ♦6 |
EW: ♣3/4 ♦5 ♥5 ♠3 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
170 3.00 0.00 2♠ S +2 3-Nadler-Nadler vs 7-Barrett-Micone
150 2.00 1.00 1N S +2 2-Gallagher-Devine vs 4-Rodzach-Smith
120 1.00 2.00 1N S +1 5-Gugick-Sullivan vs 6-Naschold-Joerger
100 0.00 3.00 2♥ W -1 8-Shifrin-Barsky vs 1-Marquardt-Wood
|
4 |
♠KQT765
♥9
♦JT95
♣73
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
♠J3
♥AQJ743
♦AQ6
♣T9
|
♠A8
♥KT852
♦K874
♣K6
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 2♠ ♦4 ♥3 NT3 |
EW: 3♦ 4♥ 4/-NT ♣4 ♠4 NT10/6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 2.50 0.50 5♥ W -1 2-Gallagher-Devine vs 4-Rodzach-Smith
100 2.50 0.50 5♥ W -1 5-Gugick-Sullivan vs 6-Naschold-Joerger
620 1.00 2.00 4♥ W 3-Nadler-Nadler vs 7-Barrett-Micone
1100 0.00 3.00 5♣* S -4 8-Shifrin-Barsky vs 1-Marquardt-Wood
|
5 |
♠AT5
♥A7
♦QT8532
♣63
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
♠73
♥KJ4
♦A976
♣AQ82
|
♠K2
♥9865
♦J4
♣KJT95
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 2♠ ♣3 ♥4 NT4 |
EW: 4♣ 2♥ 1NT ♦6 ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
170 3.00 0.00 2♠ S +2 4-Rodzach-Smith vs 1-Marquardt-Wood
50 1.50 1.50 2N W -1 6-Naschold-Joerger vs 7-Barrett-Micone
50 1.50 1.50 3♥ E -1 3-Nadler-Nadler vs 5-Gugick-Sullivan
200 0.00 3.00 4♠ S -2 8-Shifrin-Barsky vs 2-Gallagher-Devine
|
6 |
♠JT97
♥Q73
♦Q65
♣A97
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
♠AK53
♥AJ92
♦A43
♣86
|
♠64
♥K654
♦9872
♣KJ4
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6 ♦4 ♥3 ♠5 NT5 |
EW: 1♣ 3♦ 4♥ 2♠ 2NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 3.00 0.00 1N W -1 8-Shifrin-Barsky vs 2-Gallagher-Devine
50 2.00 1.00 2♣ S -1 4-Rodzach-Smith vs 1-Marquardt-Wood
90 1.00 2.00 1N W 3-Nadler-Nadler vs 5-Gugick-Sullivan
120 0.00 3.00 1N W +1 6-Naschold-Joerger vs 7-Barrett-Micone
|
7 |
♠AK2
♥KQJ43
♦6
♣J643
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
♠J964
♥AT86
♦JT2
♣Q8
|
♠-
♥52
♦K8754
♣AT9752
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♥ 4♠ 3NT ♣5 ♦5 |
EW: 1♣ 2/1♦ ♥4 ♠3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
200 3.00 0.00 4♣* E -1 8-Shifrin-Barsky vs 2-Gallagher-Devine
100 1.00 2.00 5♠ S -1 3-Nadler-Nadler vs 5-Gugick-Sullivan
100 1.00 2.00 5♠ S -1 4-Rodzach-Smith vs 1-Marquardt-Wood
100 1.00 2.00 5♠ S -1 6-Naschold-Joerger vs 7-Barrett-Micone
|
8 |
♠2
♥7653
♦AT
♣KT9632
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
♠AKQT963
♥A2
♦J9
♣84
|
♠J74
♥QT94
♦KQ843
♣Q
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 1♥ ♦2 ♠2 NT5 |
EW: 3♦ 4♠ ♣4 ♥5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 3.00 0.00 3N W -2 6-Naschold-Joerger vs 7-Barrett-Micone
450 1.00 2.00 5♠ W 4-Rodzach-Smith vs 1-Marquardt-Wood
450 1.00 2.00 4♠ W +1 3-Nadler-Nadler vs 5-Gugick-Sullivan
450 1.00 2.00 4♠ W +1 8-Shifrin-Barsky vs 2-Gallagher-Devine
|
9 |
♠974
♥KJ765
♦T85
♣86
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
♠Q3
♥A8
♦AK943
♣QJ73
|
♠AKJT8
♥T92
♦J2
♣AT5
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣1 ♦2 ♥5 ♠1 NT2 |
EW: 6♣ 5♦ 2♥ 5♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
600 2.83 0.17 3N W 7-Barrett-Micone vs 1-Marquardt-Wood
620 1.50 1.50 5♦ W +1 8-Shifrin-Barsky vs 3-Nadler-Nadler
690 0.17 2.83 3N W +3 4-Rodzach-Smith vs 6-Naschold-Joerger
|
10 |
♠K53
♥KQJ32
♦9
♣Q542
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
♠AQJT
♥T87
♦AQT4
♣J8
|
♠98762
♥A64
♦6
♣KT73
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6 ♦6 ♥6 ♠3 NT5 |
EW: 1♣ 1♥ 4♠ 1NT ♦6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 2.83 0.17 4♠ E -1 7-Barrett-Micone vs 1-Marquardt-Wood
300 1.50 1.50 3♦ S -3 4-Rodzach-Smith vs 6-Naschold-Joerger
620 0.17 2.83 4♠ W 8-Shifrin-Barsky vs 3-Nadler-Nadler
|
11 |
♠64
♥KQ862
♦K94
♣T82
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
♠QJ7
♥974
♦752
♣KJ74
|
♠T853
♥JT
♦AQJ
♣Q963
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ 3♥ 2NT ♣6 ♠6 |
EW: 1♣ 1♠ ♦4 ♥4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
170 2.83 0.17 2♥ N +2 8-Shifrin-Barsky vs 3-Nadler-Nadler
140 1.50 1.50 3♥ S 4-Rodzach-Smith vs 6-Naschold-Joerger
120 0.17 2.83 2N S 7-Barrett-Micone vs 1-Marquardt-Wood
|
12 |
♠T964
♥J97542
♦T4
♣2
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
♠AJ3
♥Q8
♦AJ97
♣8643
|
♠K852
♥K3
♦K865
♣JT5
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 2♥ ♦4 ♠5 NT6 |
EW: 3♦ 1♠ 1NT ♣5 ♥3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
170 2.83 0.17 2♥ S +2 4-Rodzach-Smith vs 6-Naschold-Joerger
140 1.50 1.50 2♥ N +1 8-Shifrin-Barsky vs 3-Nadler-Nadler
110 0.17 2.83 2♥ S 7-Barrett-Micone vs 1-Marquardt-Wood
|
13 |
♠AK
♥T53
♦Q98
♣Q8743
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
♠T8764
♥96
♦AKJ4
♣KJ
|
♠Q5
♥AKQJ742
♦63
♣A2
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ ♦3 ♥1 ♠4 NT1 |
EW: 3♦ 5♥ 3♠ 5NT ♣6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
620 3.00 0.00 4♥ E 6-Naschold-Joerger vs 3-Nadler-Nadler
650 1.50 1.50 4♥ E +1 1-Marquardt-Wood vs 2-Gallagher-Devine
650 1.50 1.50 4♥ E +1 8-Shifrin-Barsky vs 4-Rodzach-Smith
690 0.00 3.00 3N W +3 5-Gugick-Sullivan vs 7-Barrett-Micone
|
14 |
♠AJT7
♥KJT82
♦87
♣75
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
♠K2
♥A9654
♦A2
♣AKJ4
|
♠Q54
♥Q7
♦KQJT
♣T982
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣2 ♦3 ♥4 ♠5 NT2 |
EW: 5♣ 3/4♦ 3♥ 1♠ 4/5NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
430 2.00 1.00 3N E +1 1-Marquardt-Wood vs 2-Gallagher-Devine
430 2.00 1.00 3N E +1 6-Naschold-Joerger vs 3-Nadler-Nadler
430 2.00 1.00 3N E +1 8-Shifrin-Barsky vs 4-Rodzach-Smith
460 0.00 3.00 3N W +2 5-Gugick-Sullivan vs 7-Barrett-Micone
|
15 |
♠73
♥J872
♦T7
♣KQJ95
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
♠982
♥K94
♦J932
♣874
|
♠Q
♥A6
♦AQ865
♣AT632
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♥ 3♠ 2NT ♣6 ♦4 |
EW: 1♣ 3♦ ♥3 ♠3 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
300 3.00 0.00 5♦* W -2 1-Marquardt-Wood vs 2-Gallagher-Devine
170 2.00 1.00 3♠ S +1 8-Shifrin-Barsky vs 4-Rodzach-Smith
100 1.00 2.00 5♦ W -2 5-Gugick-Sullivan vs 7-Barrett-Micone
200 0.00 3.00 5♠* S -1 6-Naschold-Joerger vs 3-Nadler-Nadler
|
16 |
♠K982
♥T
♦A62
♣AJT52
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
♠A5
♥QJ8
♦KT74
♣Q973
|
♠QT63
♥A974
♦QJ53
♣8
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 1♠ 1NT ♦4 ♥6 |
EW: 3/2♦ ♣5 ♥6 ♠5/6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
200 3.00 0.00 2N W -2 8-Shifrin-Barsky vs 4-Rodzach-Smith
100 2.00 1.00 2N W -1 5-Gugick-Sullivan vs 7-Barrett-Micone
80 1.00 2.00 1♠ N 6-Naschold-Joerger vs 3-Nadler-Nadler
100 0.00 3.00 3♠ N -2 1-Marquardt-Wood vs 2-Gallagher-Devine
|
17 |
♠92
♥J8743
♦QJT8
♣T7
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
♠JT86
♥Q6
♦A543
♣A52
|
♠A3
♥AKT5
♦K962
♣843
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6 ♦3 ♥5 ♠6 NT5 |
EW: 1/-♣ 4♦ 2♥ 1♠ 2NT ♣7/6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 2.17 0.83 3N E -2 8-Shifrin-Barsky vs 5-Gugick-Sullivan
100 2.17 0.83 3♦ E -2 2-Gallagher-Devine vs 3-Nadler-Nadler
50 0.17 2.83 3N W -1 7-Barrett-Micone vs 4-Rodzach-Smith
|
18 |
♠-
♥863
♦98764
♣QJ963
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
♠KQT94
♥AKQT
♦AK2
♣7
|
♠87632
♥4
♦J53
♣K854
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6 ♦5/6 ♥5 ♠2 NT2 |
EW: -/1♣ 1♦ -/1♥ 5♠ 3NT ♣6/7 ♥6/7 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
420 2.83 0.17 4♠ W 8-Shifrin-Barsky vs 5-Gugick-Sullivan
450 0.83 2.17 5♠ E 7-Barrett-Micone vs 4-Rodzach-Smith
450 0.83 2.17 4♠ E +1 2-Gallagher-Devine vs 3-Nadler-Nadler
|
19 |
♠KQ8
♥AK85
♦Q92
♣AT3
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
♠63
♥QJT3
♦K86
♣8754
|
♠T9742
♥6
♦754
♣J962
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 4♦ 5♥ 4♠ 5NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦2 ♥2 ♠3 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
460 2.17 0.83 4N S +1 2-Gallagher-Devine vs 3-Nadler-Nadler
460 2.17 0.83 3N N +2 8-Shifrin-Barsky vs 5-Gugick-Sullivan
100 0.17 2.83 6N S -2 7-Barrett-Micone vs 4-Rodzach-Smith
|
20 |
♠QT87
♥T62
♦J
♣A8643
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
♠6
♥KJ75
♦KT43
♣KQ72
|
♠J532
♥Q4
♦Q98765
♣5
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 2♥ 3♠ 1NT ♦4 |
EW: 3♦ ♣3 ♥4 ♠4 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
200 2.83 0.17 4♦* W -1 7-Barrett-Micone vs 4-Rodzach-Smith
130 1.50 1.50 3♣ S +1 2-Gallagher-Devine vs 3-Nadler-Nadler
300 0.17 2.83 3N S -3 8-Shifrin-Barsky vs 5-Gugick-Sullivan
|
21 |
♠AT76
♥A9
♦T87432
♣3
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
♠53
♥KJ8743
♦-
♣AJ854
|
♠8
♥QT6
♦KQJ96
♣KT96
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 3/4♠ 2NT ♣1/2 ♥2 |
EW: 5♣ 4♥ ♦6 ♠3 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
790 2.83 0.17 4♠* S 1-Marquardt-Wood vs 5-Gugick-Sullivan
100 1.50 1.50 5♠ S -1 8-Shifrin-Barsky vs 6-Naschold-Joerger
200 0.17 2.83 5♠ S -2 7-Barrett-Micone vs 2-Gallagher-Devine
|
22 |
♠75
♥AT962
♦AJ4
♣732
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
♠J32
♥K84
♦KQT85
♣Q4
|
♠QT984
♥Q
♦63
♣AJT96
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♥ 2NT ♣6 ♦6 ♠5 |
EW: 1♣ 1♦ 2♠ ♥4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
140 2.83 0.17 3♥ N 1-Marquardt-Wood vs 5-Gugick-Sullivan
PASS 1.50 1.50 Pass Out 7-Barrett-Micone vs 2-Gallagher-Devine
50 0.17 2.83 4♥ N -1 8-Shifrin-Barsky vs 6-Naschold-Joerger
|
23 |
♠Q52
♥QJT96
♦K6
♣KQT
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
♠K976
♥A7
♦754
♣AJ75
|
♠AT
♥K852
♦AQT82
♣92
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦2 ♥4 ♠3 NT3 |
EW: 4♣ 5♦ 3♥ 3♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
150 2.83 0.17 3♦ E +2 8-Shifrin-Barsky vs 6-Naschold-Joerger
600 0.83 2.17 3N W 1-Marquardt-Wood vs 5-Gugick-Sullivan
600 0.83 2.17 3N E 7-Barrett-Micone vs 2-Gallagher-Devine
|
24 |
♠J
♥JT8
♦AQ85
♣A9843
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
♠762
♥7643
♦J63
♣KQ6
|
♠KQ983
♥Q52
♦KT94
♣7
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 3♦ 2♥ 2♠ 4/3NT |
EW: ♣2 ♦4 ♥5 ♠5 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
430 2.83 0.17 3N S +1 7-Barrett-Micone vs 2-Gallagher-Devine
200 1.50 1.50 3♠ E -4 1-Marquardt-Wood vs 5-Gugick-Sullivan
150 0.17 2.83 3♣ N +2 8-Shifrin-Barsky vs 6-Naschold-Joerger
|
25 |
♠QJ2
♥KT
♦A98432
♣98
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
♠T83
♥AJ5432
♦QJ5
♣J
|
♠K95
♥97
♦76
♣AK7543
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 3♦ 2♠ 2NT ♥6 |
EW: 1♥ ♣6 ♦4 ♠4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
120 2.83 0.17 2N N 4-Rodzach-Smith vs 5-Gugick-Sullivan
110 1.50 1.50 3♦ N 2-Gallagher-Devine vs 6-Naschold-Joerger
50 0.17 2.83 3N S -1 1-Marquardt-Wood vs 3-Nadler-Nadler
|
26 |
♠KJ9532
♥Q86
♦92
♣A7
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
♠76
♥KT972
♦A5
♣KQ83
|
♠T84
♥J4
♦73
♣JT9654
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4/6♦ 1♥ 5♠ 2NT ♣5 |
EW: 2♣ ♦1 ♥5 ♠1 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
620 2.83 0.17 4♠ N 2-Gallagher-Devine vs 6-Naschold-Joerger
600 0.83 2.17 3N N 1-Marquardt-Wood vs 3-Nadler-Nadler
600 0.83 2.17 3N N 4-Rodzach-Smith vs 5-Gugick-Sullivan
|
27 |
♠K52
♥9865
♦Q83
♣AK8
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
♠AT43
♥J43
♦KT65
♣74
|
♠Q86
♥Q
♦A972
♣JT963
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♥ 1NT ♣6 ♦5 ♠6 |
EW: 1♣ 2♦ 1♠ ♥5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
PASS 2.83 0.17 Pass Out 4-Rodzach-Smith vs 5-Gugick-Sullivan
100 0.83 2.17 4♥ S -2 1-Marquardt-Wood vs 3-Nadler-Nadler
100 0.83 2.17 4♥ S -2 2-Gallagher-Devine vs 6-Naschold-Joerger
|
28 |
♠J86
♥AJ64
♦KJ853
♣4
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
♠QT73
♥952
♦T9
♣K765
|
♠A942
♥K7
♦74
♣A9832
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♦ 4♥ 1NT ♣5 ♠5 |
EW: 2♣ 2♠ ♦3 ♥3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
620 2.17 0.83 4♥ S 1-Marquardt-Wood vs 3-Nadler-Nadler
620 2.17 0.83 4♥ S 4-Rodzach-Smith vs 5-Gugick-Sullivan
130 0.17 2.83 3♦ N +1 2-Gallagher-Devine vs 6-Naschold-Joerger
|