1 |
♠JT62
♥AKJ962
♦96
♣5
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
♠Q8
♥Q
♦AQJ82
♣QJ943
|
♠AK9
♥843
♦T53
♣T762
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♥ 1/2♠ ♣2 ♦2 NT5 |
EW: 4♣ 3♦ ♥4 ♠5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
PASS 4.00 0.00 Pass Out 5-Schaffer-Halenza vs 3-Foster-Norton Jr
50 3.00 1.00 4♥ N -1 4-Haralson-Nixon vs 6-Nadler-Nadler
130 1.50 2.50 3♦ W +1 3-Bentley-Siggins vs 4-Howard-Roberts
130 1.50 2.50 3♣ W +1 6-Litman-Smith vs 5-Nelson-Nelson
150 0.00 4.00 3♣ E +2 1-Gallagher-Devine vs 1-Erickson-Kucha
|
2 |
♠KJT8
♥J76
♦T95
♣754
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
♠7
♥AKT94
♦J7
♣AQT83
|
♠A95432
♥832
♦AQ8
♣2
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦3 ♥2 ♠4 NT4 |
EW: 4♣ 3♦ 5♥ 3♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
300 4.00 0.00 4♠* E -2 1-Gallagher-Devine vs 1-Erickson-Kucha
50 3.00 1.00 4♥ W -1 4-Haralson-Nixon vs 6-Nadler-Nadler
140 2.00 2.00 2♠ E +1 5-Schaffer-Halenza vs 3-Foster-Norton Jr
170 1.00 3.00 2♠ E +2 6-Litman-Smith vs 5-Nelson-Nelson
420 0.00 4.00 4♥ W 3-Bentley-Siggins vs 4-Howard-Roberts
|
3 |
♠T64
♥43
♦KQ874
♣A52
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
♠AQ853
♥K862
♦6
♣984
|
♠J9
♥AT97
♦9532
♣K63
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 1NT ♣6 ♥3 ♠5 |
EW: 4♥ 2♠ ♣6 ♦5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
90 4.00 0.00 2♦ N 6-Litman-Smith vs 5-Nelson-Nelson
50 2.00 2.00 2N S -1 4-Haralson-Nixon vs 6-Nadler-Nadler
50 2.00 2.00 1N N -1 1-Gallagher-Devine vs 1-Erickson-Kucha
50 2.00 2.00 3♦ N -1 5-Schaffer-Halenza vs 3-Foster-Norton Jr
140 0.00 4.00 3♠ W 3-Bentley-Siggins vs 4-Howard-Roberts
|
4 |
♠Q9653
♥A5
♦AK9
♣652
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
♠82
♥T8
♦QJT85
♣KT93
|
♠JT7
♥QJ7643
♦63
♣J4
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 3♦ 2♥ 5♠ 5NT |
EW: ♣3 ♦4 ♥5 ♠2 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
620 3.00 1.00 4♠ S 6-Litman-Smith vs 5-Nelson-Nelson
620 3.00 1.00 4♠ N 1-Gallagher-Devine vs 1-Erickson-Kucha
620 3.00 1.00 4♠ N 4-Haralson-Nixon vs 6-Nadler-Nadler
140 1.00 3.00 2♠ N +1 5-Schaffer-Halenza vs 3-Foster-Norton Jr
100 0.00 4.00 5♠ N -1 3-Bentley-Siggins vs 4-Howard-Roberts
|
5 |
♠Q653
♥AQ93
♦Q8
♣643
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
♠JT84
♥64
♦6432
♣AT5
|
♠AK2
♥K87
♦AKJT9
♣82
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1/-♣ ♣7/6 ♦2 ♥6 ♠4/3 NT4/3 |
EW: 5♦ 3♠ 3NT ♣6 ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
50 4.00 0.00 3N E -1 3-Bentley-Siggins vs 4-Howard-Roberts
130 3.00 1.00 3♦ E +1 4-Haralson-Nixon vs 6-Nadler-Nadler
150 1.00 3.00 1N E +2 1-Gallagher-Devine vs 1-Erickson-Kucha
150 1.00 3.00 1N E +2 5-Schaffer-Halenza vs 3-Foster-Norton Jr
150 1.00 3.00 1♦ E +4 6-Litman-Smith vs 5-Nelson-Nelson
|
6 |
♠KJ
♥Q87
♦AKJT2
♣A95
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
♠872
♥AT2
♦9876
♣K64
|
♠AQ95
♥965
♦Q5
♣J832
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 4♦ 4♥ 3♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦3 ♥3 ♠4 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
180 4.00 0.00 1N N +3 4-Haralson-Nixon vs 5-Nelson-Nelson
150 3.00 1.00 2N N +1 1-Gallagher-Devine vs 6-Nadler-Nadler
140 2.00 2.00 2♥ S +1 6-Litman-Smith vs 4-Howard-Roberts
120 0.50 3.50 2N N 2-Cleary-Gold vs 2-Zuckerman-Zuckerman
120 0.50 3.50 1N N +1 5-Schaffer-Halenza vs 1-Erickson-Kucha
|
7 |
♠Q732
♥Q
♦KJT4
♣A965
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
♠6
♥KT3
♦6532
♣Q8743
|
♠T84
♥A98642
♦98
♣KJ
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 4♦ 5♠ 4NT ♥5 |
EW: 2♥ ♣5 ♦3 ♠1 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
680 4.00 0.00 4♠ S +2 4-Haralson-Nixon vs 5-Nelson-Nelson
650 2.00 2.00 4♠ S +1 1-Gallagher-Devine vs 6-Nadler-Nadler
650 2.00 2.00 4♠ S +1 2-Cleary-Gold vs 2-Zuckerman-Zuckerman
650 2.00 2.00 4♠ S +1 6-Litman-Smith vs 4-Howard-Roberts
100 0.00 4.00 6♠ S -1 5-Schaffer-Halenza vs 1-Erickson-Kucha
|
8 |
♠K32
♥J9653
♦76
♣AQJ
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
♠AQT64
♥K4
♦J852
♣64
|
♠J9
♥T7
♦KQT94
♣9872
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 4♥ 1NT ♦5 ♠5 |
EW: 2♦ 2♠ ♣3 ♥3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
420 2.50 1.50 4♥ N 1-Gallagher-Devine vs 6-Nadler-Nadler
420 2.50 1.50 4♥ N 2-Cleary-Gold vs 2-Zuckerman-Zuckerman
420 2.50 1.50 4♥ N 4-Haralson-Nixon vs 5-Nelson-Nelson
420 2.50 1.50 4♥ N 6-Litman-Smith vs 4-Howard-Roberts
50 0.00 4.00 3♦ E -1 5-Schaffer-Halenza vs 1-Erickson-Kucha
|
9 |
♠AQ3
♥K85
♦JT532
♣J5
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
♠T9876
♥4
♦A7
♣AT982
|
♠KJ5
♥QJ9732
♦9
♣Q63
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ 2/1NT ♣4 ♥6/5 ♠4 |
EW: 3♣ 1♥ 3♠ ♦4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
500 4.00 0.00 4♠* W -2 6-Litman-Smith vs 4-Howard-Roberts
110 3.00 1.00 3♦ S 4-Haralson-Nixon vs 5-Nelson-Nelson
100 2.00 2.00 3♠ W -1 5-Schaffer-Halenza vs 1-Erickson-Kucha
50 1.00 3.00 3N N -1 2-Cleary-Gold vs 2-Zuckerman-Zuckerman
500 0.00 4.00 5♦* S -3 1-Gallagher-Devine vs 6-Nadler-Nadler
|
10 |
♠AK53
♥KJ85
♦KQ94
♣5
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
♠JT4
♥T4
♦AJ
♣AQJT92
|
♠87
♥9763
♦T873
♣K43
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ 4♥ 5♠ ♣5 NT6 |
EW: 1♣ ♦3 ♥3 ♠2 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
650 4.00 0.00 4♠ S +1 6-Litman-Smith vs 4-Howard-Roberts
200 2.00 2.00 3♠ S +2 5-Schaffer-Halenza vs 1-Erickson-Kucha
200 2.00 2.00 2♠ S +3 1-Gallagher-Devine vs 6-Nadler-Nadler
200 2.00 2.00 2♠ S +3 2-Cleary-Gold vs 2-Zuckerman-Zuckerman
170 0.00 4.00 3♠ S +1 4-Haralson-Nixon vs 5-Nelson-Nelson
|
11 |
♠K43
♥J3
♦J73
♣KT973
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
♠Q952
♥85
♦T842
♣654
|
♠JT
♥KQT76
♦AKQ96
♣Q
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 2♠ 2NT ♦4 ♥5 |
EW: 3♦ 1♥ ♣3 ♠5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 4.00 0.00 3♥* E -1 3-Bentley-Siggins vs 3-Foster-Norton Jr
50 2.00 2.00 3♥ E -1 6-Litman-Smith vs 2-Zuckerman-Zuckerman
50 2.00 2.00 4♦ E -1 5-Schaffer-Halenza vs 6-Nadler-Nadler
50 2.00 2.00 3♦ E -1 2-Cleary-Gold vs 1-Erickson-Kucha
130 0.00 4.00 4♦ E 1-Gallagher-Devine vs 5-Nelson-Nelson
|
12 |
♠KQJ8
♥KQ75
♦K97
♣64
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
♠AT763
♥A
♦QJ652
♣J7
|
♠2
♥J94
♦T83
♣KT9532
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♥ 3♠ 2NT ♣5 ♦5 |
EW: 1♣ ♦6 ♥3 ♠4 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
730 4.00 0.00 3♥* N 3-Bentley-Siggins vs 3-Foster-Norton Jr
650 3.00 1.00 4♥ S +1 1-Gallagher-Devine vs 5-Nelson-Nelson
200 2.00 2.00 3♥ S +2 6-Litman-Smith vs 2-Zuckerman-Zuckerman
170 1.00 3.00 3♥ S +1 2-Cleary-Gold vs 1-Erickson-Kucha
50 0.00 4.00 2♦ W -1 5-Schaffer-Halenza vs 6-Nadler-Nadler
|
13 |
♠KQ
♥K982
♦A87
♣JT63
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
♠92
♥A75
♦T642
♣9842
|
♠AJ86
♥J6
♦QJ953
♣AQ
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 3♥ 2♠ 1NT ♦5 |
EW: 2♦ ♣4 ♥3 ♠5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
170 3.50 0.50 3♥ S +1 6-Litman-Smith vs 2-Zuckerman-Zuckerman
170 3.50 0.50 2♥ N +2 2-Cleary-Gold vs 1-Erickson-Kucha
100 2.00 2.00 1N E -1 1-Gallagher-Devine vs 5-Nelson-Nelson
100 1.00 3.00 1N N -1 5-Schaffer-Halenza vs 6-Nadler-Nadler
200 0.00 4.00 2N N -2 3-Bentley-Siggins vs 3-Foster-Norton Jr
|
14 |
♠JT93
♥52
♦Q62
♣QJ76
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
♠86
♥KQJ3
♦K4
♣AT983
|
♠K54
♥T9876
♦T9875
♣-
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ -/1♦ 2♠ 2NT ♦6/7 ♥4 |
EW: 3♥ ♣5 ♦6 ♠4/3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
150 3.00 1.00 5♠ S -3 3-Bentley-Siggins vs 3-Foster-Norton Jr
150 3.00 1.00 4♠ N -3 1-Gallagher-Devine vs 5-Nelson-Nelson
150 3.00 1.00 4♠ N -3 6-Litman-Smith vs 2-Zuckerman-Zuckerman
170 1.00 3.00 3♥ E +1 5-Schaffer-Halenza vs 6-Nadler-Nadler
590 0.00 4.00 4♥* E 2-Cleary-Gold vs 1-Erickson-Kucha
|
15 |
♠AJ873
♥AQ7
♦T65
♣Q8
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
♠9
♥K653
♦KQ92
♣J765
|
♠T642
♥98
♦J87
♣T943
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 3♦ 4♥ 6♠ 6NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦3 ♥1 ♠1 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
1460 3.50 0.50 6♠ S +1 2-Cleary-Gold vs 1-Erickson-Kucha
1460 3.50 0.50 6♠ S +1 5-Schaffer-Halenza vs 6-Nadler-Nadler
1430 2.00 2.00 6♠ N 3-Bentley-Siggins vs 3-Foster-Norton Jr
680 0.50 3.50 4♠ S +2 1-Gallagher-Devine vs 5-Nelson-Nelson
680 0.50 3.50 4♠ S +2 6-Litman-Smith vs 2-Zuckerman-Zuckerman
|
16 |
♠QJ62
♥92
♦A8
♣AQ986
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
♠AK
♥QT5
♦T542
♣J532
|
♠T9753
♥8763
♦6
♣KT4
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 5♦ 2♥ 2♠ 4NT |
EW: ♣5 ♦1 ♥3 ♠4 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
460 3.50 0.50 3N S +2 4-Haralson-Nixon vs 4-Howard-Roberts
460 3.50 0.50 3N N +2 2-Cleary-Gold vs 6-Nadler-Nadler
400 2.00 2.00 3N S 3-Bentley-Siggins vs 2-Zuckerman-Zuckerman
150 1.00 3.00 3♦ S +2 6-Litman-Smith vs 1-Erickson-Kucha
130 0.00 4.00 3♦ S +1 1-Gallagher-Devine vs 3-Foster-Norton Jr
|
17 |
♠JT942
♥Q6
♦852
♣K32
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
♠AK8
♥9
♦KT94
♣Q8765
|
♠765
♥K542
♦AQ3
♣AT4
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣2 ♦2 ♥6 ♠5 NT3 |
EW: 5♣ 5/4♦ 1♥ 2♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 3.50 0.50 3N E -2 3-Bentley-Siggins vs 2-Zuckerman-Zuckerman
100 3.50 0.50 3N E -2 4-Haralson-Nixon vs 4-Howard-Roberts
110 2.00 2.00 3♣ E 2-Cleary-Gold vs 6-Nadler-Nadler
150 1.00 3.00 3♣ E +2 6-Litman-Smith vs 1-Erickson-Kucha
430 0.00 4.00 3N E +1 1-Gallagher-Devine vs 3-Foster-Norton Jr
|
18 |
♠J96
♥7
♦KJ87
♣J7653
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
♠KT74
♥QT654
♦A5
♣AK
|
♠Q8532
♥9
♦T64
♣QT82
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 1♥ ♣6 ♠3 NT5 |
EW: 4♠ 1NT ♣6 ♦5 ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 3.50 0.50 2♥ S -1 2-Cleary-Gold vs 6-Nadler-Nadler
100 3.50 0.50 2♥ S -1 4-Haralson-Nixon vs 4-Howard-Roberts
140 2.00 2.00 3♠ E 3-Bentley-Siggins vs 2-Zuckerman-Zuckerman
170 1.00 3.00 2♠ W +2 6-Litman-Smith vs 1-Erickson-Kucha
500 0.00 4.00 3♥* S -2 1-Gallagher-Devine vs 3-Foster-Norton Jr
|
19 |
♠532
♥Q72
♦AQT85
♣87
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
♠KQ4
♥KJ63
♦K962
♣AJ
|
♠J96
♥AT954
♦43
♣QT2
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ ♦6 ♥3 ♠6 NT4 |
EW: 1♦ 4♥ 3NT ♣5 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
110 4.00 0.00 2♣ N +1 3-Bentley-Siggins vs 2-Zuckerman-Zuckerman
100 2.50 1.50 4♥ W -1 1-Gallagher-Devine vs 3-Foster-Norton Jr
100 2.50 1.50 3♥ E -1 2-Cleary-Gold vs 6-Nadler-Nadler
90 1.00 3.00 1N W 4-Haralson-Nixon vs 4-Howard-Roberts
620 0.00 4.00 4♥ W 6-Litman-Smith vs 1-Erickson-Kucha
|
20 |
♠A54
♥K943
♦7
♣Q8762
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
♠T6
♥T8765
♦QT9
♣KT3
|
♠KQJ97
♥2
♦KJ6432
♣A
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 2♥ ♦3 ♠4 NT6 |
EW: 4♦ 2♠ ♣3 ♥5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
110 3.50 0.50 2♠ E 4-Haralson-Nixon vs 4-Howard-Roberts
110 3.50 0.50 1♠ E +1 1-Gallagher-Devine vs 3-Foster-Norton Jr
130 1.50 2.50 4♦ E 3-Bentley-Siggins vs 2-Zuckerman-Zuckerman
130 1.50 2.50 3♦ E +1 6-Litman-Smith vs 1-Erickson-Kucha
150 0.00 4.00 3♦ E +2 2-Cleary-Gold vs 6-Nadler-Nadler
|
21 |
♠T
♥65
♦A2
♣AKT98752
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
♠J987
♥KQT93
♦985
♣J
|
♠K62
♥874
♦QJT
♣Q643
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 6♣ 4♦ 1♥ 3♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣1 ♦3 ♥4 ♠4/3 NT4/1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
680 4.00 0.00 4♠ N +2 2-Cleary-Gold vs 4-Howard-Roberts
600 3.00 1.00 5♣ N 4-Haralson-Nixon vs 3-Foster-Norton Jr
100 2.00 2.00 3N S -1 5-Schaffer-Halenza vs 5-Nelson-Nelson
200 1.00 3.00 4♦ S -2 3-Bentley-Siggins vs 1-Erickson-Kucha
1700 0.00 4.00 7N* S -6 1-Gallagher-Devine vs 2-Zuckerman-Zuckerman
|
22 |
♠KT32
♥84
♦JT63
♣J93
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
♠8
♥K7532
♦AQ954
♣K8
|
♠Q964
♥AT9
♦K72
♣A42
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ ♦3 ♥2 ♠6 NT4 |
EW: 4♦ 5♥ 3/2NT ♣6 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
600 3.50 0.50 3N E 1-Gallagher-Devine vs 2-Zuckerman-Zuckerman
600 3.50 0.50 3N E 5-Schaffer-Halenza vs 5-Nelson-Nelson
620 2.00 2.00 4♥ W 2-Cleary-Gold vs 4-Howard-Roberts
650 0.50 3.50 4♥ W +1 4-Haralson-Nixon vs 3-Foster-Norton Jr
650 0.50 3.50 4♥ E +1 3-Bentley-Siggins vs 1-Erickson-Kucha
|
23 |
♠Q976
♥A94
♦J72
♣AJ4
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
♠T2
♥7653
♦K986
♣K97
|
♠KJ
♥KJT2
♦QT54
♣Q83
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 3/2♠ 1NT ♦5 ♥6/5 |
EW: 1♦ 1♥ ♣5 ♠4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
200 4.00 0.00 3♥ E -2 4-Haralson-Nixon vs 3-Foster-Norton Jr
140 3.00 1.00 3♠ S 2-Cleary-Gold vs 4-Howard-Roberts
PASS 2.00 2.00 Pass Out 3-Bentley-Siggins vs 1-Erickson-Kucha
100 1.00 3.00 3♠ S -1 5-Schaffer-Halenza vs 5-Nelson-Nelson
200 0.00 4.00 4♠ S -2 1-Gallagher-Devine vs 2-Zuckerman-Zuckerman
|
24 |
♠T62
♥A72
♦AT64
♣A43
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
♠9754
♥KJ83
♦9
♣JT82
|
♠AQ83
♥94
♦875
♣Q765
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♦ 3♥ 3NT ♣5/6 ♠5 |
EW: 1♣ 1♠ ♦3 ♥4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
430 4.00 0.00 3N S +1 1-Gallagher-Devine vs 2-Zuckerman-Zuckerman
400 2.00 2.00 3N S 4-Haralson-Nixon vs 3-Foster-Norton Jr
400 2.00 2.00 3N N 2-Cleary-Gold vs 4-Howard-Roberts
400 2.00 2.00 3N N 3-Bentley-Siggins vs 1-Erickson-Kucha
50 0.00 4.00 3N N -1 5-Schaffer-Halenza vs 5-Nelson-Nelson
|
25 |
♠J8654
♥T97
♦K96
♣J4
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
♠A3
♥AQJ3
♦QJ5
♣KQ87
|
♠T72
♥86
♦AT74
♣AT32
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣0 ♦1 ♥1 ♠3 NT1 |
EW: 7♣ 6♦ 6♥ 3♠ 6NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
630 4.00 0.00 3N W +1 5-Schaffer-Halenza vs 5-Nelson-Nelson
660 3.00 1.00 3N W +2 2-Cleary-Gold vs 4-Howard-Roberts
690 1.50 2.50 3N W +3 1-Gallagher-Devine vs 2-Zuckerman-Zuckerman
690 1.50 2.50 3N E +3 3-Bentley-Siggins vs 1-Erickson-Kucha
720 0.00 4.00 3N E +4 4-Haralson-Nixon vs 3-Foster-Norton Jr
|
26 |
♠JT53
♥JT62
♦KT
♣862
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
♠K864
♥Q984
♦6
♣K975
|
♠AQ92
♥A53
♦A832
♣A4
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4 ♦6 ♥2 ♠2 NT4 |
EW: 2♣ 1♦ 5♥ 5♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 4.00 0.00 3N E -1 5-Schaffer-Halenza vs 4-Howard-Roberts
600 3.00 1.00 3N E 6-Litman-Smith vs 6-Nadler-Nadler
620 1.00 3.00 4♠ E 2-Cleary-Gold vs 3-Foster-Norton Jr
620 1.00 3.00 4♠ E 4-Haralson-Nixon vs 2-Zuckerman-Zuckerman
620 1.00 3.00 4♥ W 3-Bentley-Siggins vs 5-Nelson-Nelson
|
27 |
♠KT854
♥54
♦Q6
♣AJ98
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
♠6
♥AQ62
♦AKT75
♣754
|
♠AQJ932
♥K3
♦9843
♣3
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ ♦0 ♥4 ♠2 NT3 |
EW: 6♦ 2♥ 4♠ 2NT ♣5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
50 3.50 0.50 4♠ E -1 4-Haralson-Nixon vs 2-Zuckerman-Zuckerman
50 3.50 0.50 4♠ E -1 5-Schaffer-Halenza vs 4-Howard-Roberts
150 1.50 2.50 4♦ W +1 2-Cleary-Gold vs 3-Foster-Norton Jr
150 1.50 2.50 4♦ W +1 6-Litman-Smith vs 6-Nadler-Nadler
200 0.00 4.00 1♠ N -4 3-Bentley-Siggins vs 5-Nelson-Nelson
|
28 |
♠92
♥KJ84
♦AK9752
♣T
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
♠AKJ83
♥3
♦J3
♣J8542
|
♠QT6
♥AQ975
♦T8
♣K73
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ ♣4 ♥6 ♠4 NT6 |
EW: 3♣ 2♠ ♦3 ♥6 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 4.00 0.00 4♠ W -2 2-Cleary-Gold vs 3-Foster-Norton Jr
50 1.50 2.50 3♠ W -1 3-Bentley-Siggins vs 5-Nelson-Nelson
50 1.50 2.50 3♠ W -1 4-Haralson-Nixon vs 2-Zuckerman-Zuckerman
50 1.50 2.50 3♠ W -1 5-Schaffer-Halenza vs 4-Howard-Roberts
50 1.50 2.50 3♠ W -1 6-Litman-Smith vs 6-Nadler-Nadler
|
29 |
♠T7
♥QJ3
♦AKQT
♣AK84
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
♠Q8652
♥87
♦952
♣QT5
|
♠KJ94
♥AKT9
♦7
♣J762
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ 2♥ 2NT ♣6 ♠5 |
EW: 2♠ ♣6 ♦4 ♥5 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
670 4.00 0.00 3♦* N 3-Bentley-Siggins vs 5-Nelson-Nelson
100 2.50 1.50 3♠ W -1 5-Schaffer-Halenza vs 4-Howard-Roberts
100 2.50 1.50 3♠ W -1 6-Litman-Smith vs 6-Nadler-Nadler
100 1.00 3.00 4♦ N -1 2-Cleary-Gold vs 3-Foster-Norton Jr
200 0.00 4.00 4♥* S -1 4-Haralson-Nixon vs 2-Zuckerman-Zuckerman
|
30 |
♠J975
♥T986
♦J5
♣732
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
♠AQ2
♥Q2
♦A98763
♣J6
|
♠T83
♥KJ75
♦Q4
♣KQ85
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦4 ♥5 ♠5 NT5 |
EW: 2♣ 3♦ 2♥ 1♠ 2NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
150 4.00 0.00 3N E -3 2-Cleary-Gold vs 3-Foster-Norton Jr
90 3.00 1.00 2♦ W 6-Litman-Smith vs 6-Nadler-Nadler
110 2.00 2.00 2♦ W +1 5-Schaffer-Halenza vs 4-Howard-Roberts
150 1.00 3.00 1N S -3 4-Haralson-Nixon vs 2-Zuckerman-Zuckerman
180 0.00 4.00 2N E +2 3-Bentley-Siggins vs 5-Nelson-Nelson
|