1 |
♠A975
♥J632
♦JT
♣765
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
♠KT84
♥A5
♦876
♣KQJ8
|
♠Q632
♥4
♦AQ954
♣T93
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♥ 1NT ♣5 ♦4 ♠4 |
EW: 2/1♣ 3♦ 3♠ ♥4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 3.50 0.50 3♥ S 3 ♦8 4-Olson-Olson vs 1-Hedberg-Besteman
140 3.50 0.50 3♥ S 3 ♣8 10-Waterman-Waterman vs 8-Williams-Tadken
50 2.00 2.00 5♦ E -1 ♥K 9-Hollister-Hollister vs 2-Ainbinder-Barish
100 1.00 3.00 4♥ S -2 ♣K 6-Lean-Lean vs 5-Brackett-Gasperini
140 0.00 4.00 3♠ W 3 ♥K 7-Feller-Matthews vs 3-Bujanovich-Staab
|
2 |
♠A2
♥QT5
♦KJT8
♣J532
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
♠J9753
♥J
♦A652
♣A86
|
♠4
♥K73
♦Q943
♣KQ974
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♥ 3♠ 1NT ♣4 ♦4 |
EW: 2♣ 3♦ ♥3 ♠4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
620 4.00 0.00 4♥ S 4 ♣6 9-Hollister-Hollister vs 2-Ainbinder-Barish
150 3.00 1.00 3♠ W -3 ♥5 10-Waterman-Waterman vs 8-Williams-Tadken
140 1.50 2.50 3♥ S 3 ♠4 6-Lean-Lean vs 5-Brackett-Gasperini
140 1.50 2.50 3♥ S 3 ♣A 4-Olson-Olson vs 1-Hedberg-Besteman
100 0.00 4.00 4♥ S -1 ♣A 7-Feller-Matthews vs 3-Bujanovich-Staab
|
3 |
♠A7
♥AQT86
♦AK753
♣K
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
♠QJ43
♥94
♦J8
♣JT652
|
♠K86
♥KJ3
♦QT6
♣AQ84
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 2♥ ♣4 ♠5/4 NT4 |
EW: 3♣ 2♠ 1NT ♦5 ♥5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 4.00 0.00 2♥ N 3 ♣A 7-Feller-Matthews vs 3-Bujanovich-Staab
110 3.00 1.00 2♥ N 2 ♣A 10-Waterman-Waterman vs 8-Williams-Tadken
90 2.00 2.00 2♦ N 2 ♠K 6-Lean-Lean vs 5-Brackett-Gasperini
50 1.00 3.00 2N N -1 ♦6 9-Hollister-Hollister vs 2-Ainbinder-Barish
100 0.00 4.00 3♥ N -2 ♣A 4-Olson-Olson vs 1-Hedberg-Besteman
|
4 |
♠K98743
♥76
♦T63
♣K9
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
♠AQT6
♥854
♦842
♣853
|
♠J5
♥AKQT2
♦Q7
♣AT74
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ 1♠ ♣6 ♥4 NT6 |
EW: 1♣ 2♥ 1NT ♦4 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
130 4.00 0.00 3♦ S 4 ♥8 10-Waterman-Waterman vs 9-Hollister-Hollister
110 3.00 1.00 3♦ S 3 ♥8 8-Williams-Tadken vs 4-Olson-Olson
100 2.00 2.00 2♥ E -1 ♠2 5-Brackett-Gasperini vs 2-Ainbinder-Barish
120 1.00 3.00 1N E 2 ♦A 7-Feller-Matthews vs 6-Lean-Lean
140 0.00 4.00 2♥ E 3 ♦A 1-Hedberg-Besteman vs 3-Bujanovich-Staab
|
5 |
♠7
♥6532
♦AKJ
♣K9653
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
♠KQJT63
♥JT
♦QT8
♣QT
|
♠A82
♥K874
♦43
♣J842
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 3♦ 3♥ 1NT ♠6 |
EW: 1♠ ♣3 ♦3 ♥3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.00 1.00 3♠ W -2 ♦A 1-Hedberg-Besteman vs 3-Bujanovich-Staab
100 3.00 1.00 3♠ W -2 ♦A 7-Feller-Matthews vs 6-Lean-Lean
100 3.00 1.00 3♠ W -2 ♦A 8-Williams-Tadken vs 4-Olson-Olson
50 0.50 3.50 2♠ W -1 ♦A 5-Brackett-Gasperini vs 2-Ainbinder-Barish
50 0.50 3.50 2♠ W -1 ♦A 10-Waterman-Waterman vs 9-Hollister-Hollister
|
6 |
♠AT8752
♥J94
♦763
♣T
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
♠K94
♥QT73
♦A4
♣Q732
|
♠J6
♥K86
♦KQ92
♣AKJ8
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦4 ♥3 ♠6 NT3 |
EW: 4♣ 3♦ 3♥ 1♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 4.00 0.00 3♣ E 3 ♣4 10-Waterman-Waterman vs 9-Hollister-Hollister
600 2.50 1.50 3N E 3 ♦J 7-Feller-Matthews vs 6-Lean-Lean
600 2.50 1.50 3N E 3 ♦T 8-Williams-Tadken vs 4-Olson-Olson
630 1.00 3.00 3N E 4 ♦5 1-Hedberg-Besteman vs 3-Bujanovich-Staab
660 0.00 4.00 3N E 5 ♦J 5-Brackett-Gasperini vs 2-Ainbinder-Barish
|
7 |
♠J86
♥KT
♦AJ2
♣JT986
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
♠743
♥AQ972
♦K73
♣K4
|
♠AK52
♥J83
♦T864
♣73
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ ♦6 ♥5 ♠5 NT6 |
EW: 1♦ 2♥ 2♠ ♣5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 4.00 0.00 3♥ W -2 ♣J 2-Ainbinder-Barish vs 4-Olson-Olson
100 3.00 1.00 3♣ N -1 ♠A 10-Waterman-Waterman vs 1-Hedberg-Besteman
110 2.00 2.00 2♥ W 2 ♥2 9-Hollister-Hollister vs 5-Brackett-Gasperini
140 0.50 3.50 2♥ W 3 ♣J 6-Lean-Lean vs 3-Bujanovich-Staab
140 0.50 3.50 2♥ W 3 ♣6 8-Williams-Tadken vs 7-Feller-Matthews
|
8 |
♠T863
♥Q6
♦KQ74
♣985
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
♠KJ9
♥KT9854
♦863
♣4
|
♠752
♥AJ73
♦AT
♣QT73
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 2♦ 1/2♠ ♥3 NT4 |
EW: 4♥ 1NT ♣5 ♦4 ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 3.50 0.50 3♥ W 3 ♠8 10-Waterman-Waterman vs 1-Hedberg-Besteman
140 3.50 0.50 3♥ W 3 ♦7 9-Hollister-Hollister vs 5-Brackett-Gasperini
170 1.50 2.50 3♥ W 4 ♦K 6-Lean-Lean vs 3-Bujanovich-Staab
170 1.50 2.50 3♥ W 4 ♣3 2-Ainbinder-Barish vs 4-Olson-Olson
420 0.00 4.00 4♥ W 4 ♦4 8-Williams-Tadken vs 7-Feller-Matthews
|
9 |
♠J863
♥KQ7
♦8732
♣84
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
♠KQ
♥J862
♦QJT5
♣QJ5
|
♠A74
♥AT954
♦-
♣AT973
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣2 ♦6 ♥2 ♠6 NT4 |
EW: 5/4♣ 1♦ 5♥ 1♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
620 2.50 1.50 4♥ E 4 ♦A 6-Lean-Lean vs 3-Bujanovich-Staab
620 2.50 1.50 4♥ E 4 ♦A 8-Williams-Tadken vs 7-Feller-Matthews
620 2.50 1.50 4♥ E 4 ♦A 10-Waterman-Waterman vs 1-Hedberg-Besteman
620 2.50 1.50 4♥ E 4 ♦K 2-Ainbinder-Barish vs 4-Olson-Olson
650 0.00 4.00 4♥ E 5 ♦K 9-Hollister-Hollister vs 5-Brackett-Gasperini
|
10 |
♠T83
♥QT
♦983
♣QT952
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
♠QJ6542
♥A76
♦AK
♣AK
|
♠A97
♥K943
♦JT75
♣87
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6 ♦1 ♥2 ♠0 NT0 |
EW: 1♣ 5♦ 5♥ 7♠ 7NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
660 4.00 0.00 5N W 5 ♣9 9-Hollister-Hollister vs 8-Williams-Tadken
680 2.00 2.00 4♠ W 6 ♥Q 3-Bujanovich-Staab vs 5-Brackett-Gasperini
680 2.00 2.00 4♠ W 6 ♣T 7-Feller-Matthews vs 4-Olson-Olson
680 2.00 2.00 4♠ W 6 ♣9 10-Waterman-Waterman vs 2-Ainbinder-Barish
710 0.00 4.00 5♠ W 7 ♦9 1-Hedberg-Besteman vs 6-Lean-Lean
|
11 |
♠QJ
♥Q764
♦T983
♣Q52
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
♠9875
♥3
♦K74
♣T9764
|
♠K4
♥AJ52
♦AJ5
♣AKJ8
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣2 ♦5 ♥6 ♠5 NT4 |
EW: 5♣ 1♦ 2/1♠ 3NT ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 4.00 0.00 2N E -1 ♠9 9-Hollister-Hollister vs 8-Williams-Tadken
120 2.00 2.00 2N E 2 ♠3 3-Bujanovich-Staab vs 5-Brackett-Gasperini
120 2.00 2.00 2N E 2 ♠3 7-Feller-Matthews vs 4-Olson-Olson
120 2.00 2.00 2N E 2 ♠2 10-Waterman-Waterman vs 2-Ainbinder-Barish
430 0.00 4.00 3N E 4 ♥T 1-Hedberg-Besteman vs 6-Lean-Lean
|
12 |
♠9653
♥J86
♦T98542
♣-
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
♠A42
♥QT93
♦A
♣AKJ95
|
♠KJT7
♥K75
♦K7
♣Q764
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ ♣1 ♥2 ♠1 NT1 |
EW: 6♣ 4/5♥ 4/5♠ 6NT ♦6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.00 0.00 4♠ E -2 ♦Q 3-Bujanovich-Staab vs 5-Brackett-Gasperini
420 3.00 1.00 5♣ W 6 ♦9 9-Hollister-Hollister vs 8-Williams-Tadken
460 1.50 2.50 3N E 5 ♥2 10-Waterman-Waterman vs 2-Ainbinder-Barish
460 1.50 2.50 3N E 5 ♦3 7-Feller-Matthews vs 4-Olson-Olson
990 0.00 4.00 6N W 6 ♦8 1-Hedberg-Besteman vs 6-Lean-Lean
|
13 |
♠KQ94
♥532
♦K6
♣AJ84
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
♠AJ85
♥Q
♦JT8742
♣97
|
♠T6
♥AT984
♦A3
♣KQ62
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1/-♥ 1/-NT ♣5 ♦4 ♥7/6 ♠5 NT7/6 |
EW: 3♦ 1♠ ♣6 ♥6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.00 0.00 1N W -1 ♣4 8-Williams-Tadken vs 5-Brackett-Gasperini
90 3.00 1.00 1N S 1 ♥Q 4-Olson-Olson vs 6-Lean-Lean
90 2.00 2.00 2♦ W 2 ♠K 1-Hedberg-Besteman vs 9-Hollister-Hollister
100 1.00 3.00 1N S -1 ♥Q 10-Waterman-Waterman vs 3-Bujanovich-Staab
400 0.00 4.00 1N N -4 ♦J 2-Ainbinder-Barish vs 7-Feller-Matthews
|
14 |
♠A3
♥Q93
♦AKQT5
♣K93
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
♠74
♥AK42
♦J83
♣AQT8
|
♠KQJT98652
♥8
♦62
♣2
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 2♦ 3♥ 2NT ♠2 |
EW: 4♠ ♣4 ♦4 ♥3 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.00 0.00 6♠* E -1 ♥J 4-Olson-Olson vs 6-Lean-Lean
50 3.00 1.00 5♠ E -1 ♦9 2-Ainbinder-Barish vs 7-Feller-Matthews
420 1.50 2.50 4♠ E 4 ♥7 8-Williams-Tadken vs 5-Brackett-Gasperini
420 1.50 2.50 4♠ E 4 ♦4 1-Hedberg-Besteman vs 9-Hollister-Hollister
500 0.00 4.00 5♥* S -3 ♠7 10-Waterman-Waterman vs 3-Bujanovich-Staab
|
15 |
♠T73
♥AT974
♦K9
♣T85
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
♠AQ2
♥KQ32
♦63
♣AQ32
|
♠J5
♥865
♦AJ875
♣J97
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦5 ♥5 ♠6 NT5 |
EW: 2♣ 2♦ 2♥ 2/1NT ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 4.00 0.00 1N W -1 ♥7 8-Williams-Tadken vs 5-Brackett-Gasperini
90 3.00 1.00 1N W 1 ♥9 10-Waterman-Waterman vs 3-Bujanovich-Staab
100 2.00 2.00 2♠ S -1 ♦6 2-Ainbinder-Barish vs 7-Feller-Matthews
150 0.50 3.50 2N W 3 ♥7 1-Hedberg-Besteman vs 9-Hollister-Hollister
150 0.50 3.50 1N W 3 ♥7 4-Olson-Olson vs 6-Lean-Lean
|
16 |
♠AJ952
♥KT9
♦82
♣986
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
♠-
♥AJ7
♦K9753
♣AKJ73
|
♠KT74
♥Q865
♦QJ6
♣54
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣2 ♦2 ♥3 ♠6 NT3 |
EW: 5♣ 5♦ 4♥ 1♠ 2NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.00 0.00 3N W -1 ♠2 9-Hollister-Hollister vs 6-Lean-Lean
130 3.00 1.00 2♦ W 4 ♠A 3-Bujanovich-Staab vs 8-Williams-Tadken
150 2.00 2.00 3♠ N -3 ♣5 2-Ainbinder-Barish vs 1-Hedberg-Besteman
600 1.00 3.00 5♦ W 5 ♠A 5-Brackett-Gasperini vs 7-Feller-Matthews
630 0.00 4.00 3N W 4 ♠2 10-Waterman-Waterman vs 4-Olson-Olson
|
17 |
♠6
♥74
♦T86543
♣Q863
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
♠AK94
♥KT65
♦9
♣T972
|
♠JT832
♥A982
♦J72
♣J
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 4♦ ♥3 ♠4 NT6 |
EW: 3♥ 3♠ ♣5 ♦3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
210 3.50 0.50 2N S 5 ♠4 9-Hollister-Hollister vs 6-Lean-Lean
210 3.50 0.50 2N S 5 ♥6 3-Bujanovich-Staab vs 8-Williams-Tadken
180 2.00 2.00 2N S 4 ♠A 10-Waterman-Waterman vs 4-Olson-Olson
150 1.00 3.00 4♦ N 5 ♣J 2-Ainbinder-Barish vs 1-Hedberg-Besteman
100 0.00 4.00 5♦ N -2 ♣J 5-Brackett-Gasperini vs 7-Feller-Matthews
|
18 |
♠AK92
♥Q85
♦A8763
♣A
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
♠QT
♥732
♦KQJ5
♣K742
|
♠J853
♥KJ
♦T2
♣QJT85
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 4♥ 1♠ 2NT ♣5 |
EW: 2♣ ♦5 ♥3 ♠4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 3.50 0.50 1♠ N 3 ♦T 2-Ainbinder-Barish vs 1-Hedberg-Besteman
140 3.50 0.50 1♠ N 3 ♦2 3-Bujanovich-Staab vs 8-Williams-Tadken
120 2.00 2.00 1N N 2 ♣Q 9-Hollister-Hollister vs 6-Lean-Lean
70 1.00 3.00 1♦ N 1 ♣Q 10-Waterman-Waterman vs 4-Olson-Olson
90 0.00 4.00 1N W 1 ♠A 5-Brackett-Gasperini vs 7-Feller-Matthews
|
19 |
♠T
♥65432
♦J85
♣KJ42
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
♠A654
♥QJT
♦972
♣A86
|
♠KQJ983
♥K
♦AK64
♣Q3
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6 ♦2 ♥6 ♠2 NT2 |
EW: 1♣ 4♦ 1♥ 5♠ 5NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
620 3.50 0.50 4♠ E 4 ♣T 4-Olson-Olson vs 9-Hollister-Hollister
620 3.50 0.50 4♠ E 4 ♣T 10-Waterman-Waterman vs 5-Brackett-Gasperini
650 1.00 3.00 4♠ E 5 ♣T 3-Bujanovich-Staab vs 2-Ainbinder-Barish
650 1.00 3.00 4♠ E 5 ♣T 6-Lean-Lean vs 8-Williams-Tadken
650 1.00 3.00 4♠ E 5 ♣7 1-Hedberg-Besteman vs 7-Feller-Matthews
|
20 |
♠A2
♥AJ983
♦AT642
♣3
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
♠Q764
♥54
♦KJ7
♣J864
|
♠KJT83
♥72
♦Q93
♣T95
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 5♦ 6♥ 1♠ 4NT |
EW: ♣2 ♦2 ♥1 ♠5 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
1430 4.00 0.00 6♥ N 6 ♣T 10-Waterman-Waterman vs 5-Brackett-Gasperini
680 2.00 2.00 4♥ N 6 ♠T 6-Lean-Lean vs 8-Williams-Tadken
680 2.00 2.00 4♥ N 6 ♠6 4-Olson-Olson vs 9-Hollister-Hollister
680 2.00 2.00 4♥ N 6 ♦3 3-Bujanovich-Staab vs 2-Ainbinder-Barish
650 0.00 4.00 4♥ N 5 ♠J 1-Hedberg-Besteman vs 7-Feller-Matthews
|
21 |
♠Q3
♥KQJ
♦KJT53
♣A63
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
♠AK64
♥AT
♦62
♣KQ975
|
♠J972
♥98763
♦9
♣JT4
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ ♣3 ♥5 ♠3 NT6 |
EW: 4♣ 2♥ 4♠ ♦4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 2.00 2.00 3♦ N 3 ♠9 4-Olson-Olson vs 9-Hollister-Hollister
110 2.00 2.00 3♦ N 3 ♣8 10-Waterman-Waterman vs 5-Brackett-Gasperini
110 2.00 2.00 2♦ N 3 ♥9 1-Hedberg-Besteman vs 7-Feller-Matthews
110 2.00 2.00 2♦ N 3 ♣4 3-Bujanovich-Staab vs 2-Ainbinder-Barish
110 2.00 2.00 2♦ N 3 ♣4 6-Lean-Lean vs 8-Williams-Tadken
|
22 |
♠74
♥AKQ85
♦KQJT
♣Q7
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
♠J86
♥JT2
♦764
♣J432
|
♠AKT9532
♥9
♦A93
♣95
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 5♦ 5♥ ♠5 NT5 |
EW: 2♠ ♣2/3 ♦2 ♥1/2 NT4/5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
450 2.50 1.50 5♥ N 5 ♦A 2-Ainbinder-Barish vs 8-Williams-Tadken
450 2.50 1.50 4♥ N 5 ♠A 4-Olson-Olson vs 3-Bujanovich-Staab
450 2.50 1.50 4♥ N 5 ♠A 10-Waterman-Waterman vs 6-Lean-Lean
450 2.50 1.50 4♥ N 5 ♠K 7-Feller-Matthews vs 9-Hollister-Hollister
110 0.00 4.00 2♠ E 2 ♣A 5-Brackett-Gasperini vs 1-Hedberg-Besteman
|
23 |
♠A
♥A532
♦KT95
♣AQ97
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
♠QJT2
♥QT9
♦A642
♣KT
|
♠K64
♥J864
♦73
♣6432
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 5♦ 3♥ 2♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣2 ♦2 ♥4 ♠4 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
180 3.00 1.00 1N N 4 ♥4 2-Ainbinder-Barish vs 8-Williams-Tadken
180 3.00 1.00 1N N 4 ♥4 5-Brackett-Gasperini vs 1-Hedberg-Besteman
180 3.00 1.00 1N N 4 ♦7 4-Olson-Olson vs 3-Bujanovich-Staab
140 1.00 3.00 2♠ N 3 ♥8 7-Feller-Matthews vs 9-Hollister-Hollister
110 0.00 4.00 2♠ N 2 ♦8 10-Waterman-Waterman vs 6-Lean-Lean
|
24 |
♠AQT
♥KJ95
♦52
♣QJ83
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
♠64
♥32
♦AJ973
♣T764
|
♠K987
♥AQ76
♦T8
♣K52
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♥ 1♠ 1NT ♣6 ♦6 |
EW: 1♦ ♣6 ♥5 ♠6/5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
120 2.50 1.50 2N S 2 ♣4 2-Ainbinder-Barish vs 8-Williams-Tadken
120 2.50 1.50 2N N 2 ♥6 5-Brackett-Gasperini vs 1-Hedberg-Besteman
120 2.50 1.50 1N N 2 ♥Q 7-Feller-Matthews vs 9-Hollister-Hollister
120 2.50 1.50 1N N 2 ♥3 10-Waterman-Waterman vs 6-Lean-Lean
110 0.00 4.00 2♠ S 2 ♥3 4-Olson-Olson vs 3-Bujanovich-Staab
|
25 |
♠KT76
♥A932
♦T9
♣AQ7
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
♠A52
♥KQ76
♦A42
♣K86
|
♠Q93
♥54
♦J865
♣JT95
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 2♥ 2♠ 1NT ♣6 |
EW: ♣6 ♦6 ♥5 ♠5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
120 4.00 0.00 1N N 2 ♥4 3-Bujanovich-Staab vs 9-Hollister-Hollister
100 2.50 1.50 1N W -1 ♦T 10-Waterman-Waterman vs 7-Feller-Matthews
100 2.50 1.50 2♦ E -1 ♣3 6-Lean-Lean vs 2-Ainbinder-Barish
90 1.00 3.00 1N S 1 ♥K 8-Williams-Tadken vs 1-Hedberg-Besteman
100 0.00 4.00 1N N -2 ♠3 5-Brackett-Gasperini vs 4-Olson-Olson
|
26 |
♠652
♥T84
♦T86
♣JT98
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
♠AT
♥AQ732
♦A
♣K6543
|
♠Q9743
♥9
♦KJ53
♣AQ7
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣1/2 ♦4 ♥3 ♠1 NT2/3 |
EW: 5♣ 3♦ 4♥ 6♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
300 4.00 0.00 6N E -3 ♥5 10-Waterman-Waterman vs 7-Feller-Matthews
200 3.00 1.00 5N E -2 ♦2 6-Lean-Lean vs 2-Ainbinder-Barish
100 2.00 2.00 3N E -1 ♦4 5-Brackett-Gasperini vs 4-Olson-Olson
170 1.00 3.00 2♥ W 4 ♠2 3-Bujanovich-Staab vs 9-Hollister-Hollister
650 0.00 4.00 5♠ E 5 ♣2 8-Williams-Tadken vs 1-Hedberg-Besteman
|
27 |
♠Q95432
♥KQ95
♦T2
♣4
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
♠KJ
♥A876
♦K963
♣J82
|
♠7
♥JT42
♦AJ8
♣KQT73
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♠ ♣3 ♦4/5 ♥5 NT3 |
EW: 4♣ 1♦ 2♥ 1NT ♠4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 4.00 0.00 3♠ N 3 ♦A 6-Lean-Lean vs 2-Ainbinder-Barish
50 3.00 1.00 3♥ E -1 ♣A 5-Brackett-Gasperini vs 4-Olson-Olson
PASS 1.50 2.50 Pass Out 3-Bujanovich-Staab vs 9-Hollister-Hollister
PASS 1.50 2.50 Pass Out 8-Williams-Tadken vs 1-Hedberg-Besteman
50 0.00 4.00 4♠ N -1 ♦A 10-Waterman-Waterman vs 7-Feller-Matthews
|