1 |
♠Q4
♥KQ85
♦AJ7
♣KQJ9
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
♠A953
♥A32
♦64
♣A532
|
♠J6
♥9764
♦952
♣8764
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 4♦ 3♥ 3♠ 4NT |
EW: ♣3 ♦3 ♥3 ♠4 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
460 2.50 1.50 3N N 5 ♥9 9-Lean-Lean vs 7-Williams-Tadken
460 2.50 1.50 3N N 5 ♥4 6-Hannaford-Lundgreen vs 10-Waterman-Waterman
460 2.50 1.50 3N N 5 ♥4 12-Poriss-Greenlee vs 1-Besteman-Mix
460 2.50 1.50 3N N 5 ♣8 8-Hedberg-Bujanovich vs 4-Ainbinder-Barish
400 0.00 4.00 3N N 3 ♣8 3-Hollister-Hollister vs 11-Feller-Bellinger
|
2 |
♠KQ6
♥654
♦QJ96
♣AJ9
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
♠J954
♥AK9
♦85
♣Q732
|
♠A873
♥732
♦AT2
♣654
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 3♦ 2♥ 1NT ♠6 |
EW: 1♠ ♣6 ♦4 ♥5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 4.00 0.00 1N N 3 ♥7 12-Poriss-Greenlee vs 1-Besteman-Mix
120 3.00 1.00 1N N 2 ♠3 8-Hedberg-Bujanovich vs 4-Ainbinder-Barish
90 2.00 2.00 2♦ N 2 ♣4 9-Lean-Lean vs 7-Williams-Tadken
100 0.50 3.50 1N N -1 ♠3 6-Hannaford-Lundgreen vs 10-Waterman-Waterman
100 0.50 3.50 2♦ N -1 ♥7 3-Hollister-Hollister vs 11-Feller-Bellinger
|
3 |
♠T5
♥J83
♦J872
♣AJT6
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
♠A9872
♥96
♦KQ964
♣K
|
♠J643
♥A7
♦AT5
♣Q842
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 2♥ ♦2 ♠2 NT3 |
EW: 4♦ 4♠ 1NT ♣6 ♥4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 4.00 0.00 3♥ S 3 ♦K 8-Hedberg-Bujanovich vs 4-Ainbinder-Barish
110 3.00 1.00 2♥ S 2 ♦K 6-Hannaford-Lundgreen vs 10-Waterman-Waterman
620 2.00 2.00 4♠ W 4 ♥8 12-Poriss-Greenlee vs 1-Besteman-Mix
650 1.00 3.00 4♠ W 5 ♦2 9-Lean-Lean vs 7-Williams-Tadken
680 0.00 4.00 4♠ W 6 ♣6 3-Hollister-Hollister vs 11-Feller-Bellinger
|
4 |
♠AK2
♥62
♦Q52
♣AQJ65
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
♠J643
♥97
♦AJT98
♣72
|
♠T9
♥QT8543
♦K4
♣KT4
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 1♦ 1♥ 2♠ 4NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦5 ♥6 ♠4 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
660 4.00 0.00 3N N 5 ♥5 12-Poriss-Greenlee vs 2-Olson-Olson
630 3.00 1.00 3N N 4 ♥3 6-Hannaford-Lundgreen vs 3-Hollister-Hollister
600 2.00 2.00 3N N 3 ♥5 1-Besteman-Mix vs 8-Hedberg-Bujanovich
140 1.00 3.00 3♠ S 3 ♥9 7-Williams-Tadken vs 10-Waterman-Waterman
130 0.00 4.00 3♣ S 4 ♥9 11-Feller-Bellinger vs 4-Ainbinder-Barish
|
5 |
♠KJ92
♥A5
♦AT84
♣983
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
♠64
♥96
♦Q9765
♣AQJ4
|
♠AQ5
♥KJT
♦J32
♣K762
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ 2♠ ♣3 ♦4 NT5 |
EW: 3♣ 3♦ 1NT ♥4 ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 3.50 0.50 2♠ N 2 ♦2 1-Besteman-Mix vs 8-Hedberg-Bujanovich
110 3.50 0.50 2♠ N 2 ♣2 12-Poriss-Greenlee vs 2-Olson-Olson
50 2.00 2.00 4♣ E -1 ♦K 6-Hannaford-Lundgreen vs 3-Hollister-Hollister
100 1.00 3.00 1♦ N -1 ♦2 7-Williams-Tadken vs 10-Waterman-Waterman
200 0.00 4.00 2♠ N -2 ♣2 11-Feller-Bellinger vs 4-Ainbinder-Barish
|
6 |
♠JT8532
♥9
♦Q42
♣AK4
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
♠A9
♥JT3
♦AT53
♣T765
|
♠Q64
♥AQ7
♦KJ98
♣J82
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ 1♠ ♣5 ♦5 NT5 |
EW: 2♣ 2♦ 2NT ♥5 ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 4.00 0.00 2♠ N 2 ♣2 11-Feller-Bellinger vs 4-Ainbinder-Barish
100 3.00 1.00 3♦ E -1 ♠K 6-Hannaford-Lundgreen vs 3-Hollister-Hollister
50 2.00 2.00 2♥ S -1 ♦A 12-Poriss-Greenlee vs 2-Olson-Olson
110 1.00 3.00 3♦ E 3 ♠K 1-Besteman-Mix vs 8-Hedberg-Bujanovich
120 0.00 4.00 1N W 2 ♠3 7-Williams-Tadken vs 10-Waterman-Waterman
|
7 |
♠QT7
♥QT6
♦5
♣KQT853
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
♠AK
♥AK754
♦T987
♣94
|
♠J9543
♥J832
♦AQ3
♣2
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 1NT ♦6 ♥3 ♠4 |
EW: 1/-♦ 4♥ 2♠ ♣4 ♦7/6 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 4.00 0.00 3♣ N 5 ♥2 12-Poriss-Greenlee vs 3-Hollister-Hollister
100 3.00 1.00 4♥ W -1 ♦5 2-Olson-Olson vs 9-Lean-Lean
110 2.00 2.00 2♥ W 2 ♦5 7-Williams-Tadken vs 4-Ainbinder-Barish
140 1.00 3.00 3♥ W 3 ♣K 10-Waterman-Waterman vs 8-Hedberg-Bujanovich
200 0.00 4.00 5♣ N -2 ♥2 1-Besteman-Mix vs 6-Hannaford-Lundgreen
|
8 |
♠QJ52
♥9742
♦3
♣J765
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
♠AK8
♥JT6
♦975
♣K843
|
♠964
♥Q
♦AQJT2
♣AQ92
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♥ ♣3 ♦3 ♠5 NT3 |
EW: 4/3♣ 4♦ 2♠ 2NT ♥5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
300 4.00 0.00 4♦* E -2 ♥A 12-Poriss-Greenlee vs 3-Hollister-Hollister
110 3.00 1.00 2♥ S 2 ♠A 2-Olson-Olson vs 9-Lean-Lean
110 2.00 2.00 3♣ W 3 ♥A 7-Williams-Tadken vs 4-Ainbinder-Barish
130 1.00 3.00 4♦ E 4 ♥K 10-Waterman-Waterman vs 8-Hedberg-Bujanovich
430 0.00 4.00 3N W 4 ♥2 1-Besteman-Mix vs 6-Hannaford-Lundgreen
|
9 |
♠5
♥AJ64
♦T83
♣KQJ42
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
♠KQJ64
♥T982
♦J4
♣85
|
♠987
♥K7
♦Q96
♣AT973
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3/2♣ 4♦ 2♥ 2NT ♠6 |
EW: 1♠ ♣4 ♦3 ♥5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
430 4.00 0.00 3N N 4 ♣9 12-Poriss-Greenlee vs 3-Hollister-Hollister
200 3.00 1.00 2♠* W -1 ♣K 10-Waterman-Waterman vs 8-Hedberg-Bujanovich
110 1.50 2.50 2♥ N 2 ♣T 7-Williams-Tadken vs 4-Ainbinder-Barish
110 1.50 2.50 1♥ N 2 ♣A 1-Besteman-Mix vs 6-Hannaford-Lundgreen
150 0.00 4.00 3N N -3 ♠K 2-Olson-Olson vs 9-Lean-Lean
|
10 |
♠A975
♥KT62
♦T9
♣KQ9
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
♠83
♥4
♦876543
♣A832
|
♠K42
♥QJ9873
♦A
♣J64
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♦ 1♥ 3♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣5/6 ♦5 ♥6 ♠4 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
620 4.00 0.00 4♠ N 4 ♦A 2-Olson-Olson vs 7-Williams-Tadken
100 2.50 1.50 4♠ S -1 ♥4 11-Feller-Bellinger vs 6-Hannaford-Lundgreen
100 2.50 1.50 4♠ S -1 ♥4 12-Poriss-Greenlee vs 4-Ainbinder-Barish
200 1.00 3.00 4♠ S -2 ♥4 10-Waterman-Waterman vs 9-Lean-Lean
670 0.00 4.00 2♥* E 2 ♣J 3-Hollister-Hollister vs 1-Besteman-Mix
|
11 |
♠K2
♥K962
♦QJ
♣KQT43
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
♠AJT3
♥T3
♦AT963
♣A7
|
♠Q9864
♥8754
♦K8
♣86
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 1♥ ♦3 ♠3 NT5 |
EW: 3♦ 4♠ 1NT ♣4 ♥5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
130 4.00 0.00 4♣ N 4 ♦K 10-Waterman-Waterman vs 9-Lean-Lean
110 2.50 1.50 3♣ N 3 ♦K 11-Feller-Bellinger vs 6-Hannaford-Lundgreen
110 2.50 1.50 2♣ N 3 ♦K 2-Olson-Olson vs 7-Williams-Tadken
100 1.00 3.00 2♣ N -2 ♦K 3-Hollister-Hollister vs 1-Besteman-Mix
110 0.00 4.00 3♦ W 3 ♣K 12-Poriss-Greenlee vs 4-Ainbinder-Barish
|
12 |
♠-
♥AT9843
♦KQJ
♣AK63
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
♠AK5
♥K62
♦A4
♣QT542
|
♠T97432
♥5
♦T9832
♣8
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 5♥ 3NT ♦6 ♠5 |
EW: -/1♦ 2♠ ♣5 ♦5/7 ♥2 NT3/4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
990 4.00 0.00 4♥* N 5 ♣3 10-Waterman-Waterman vs 9-Lean-Lean
650 3.00 1.00 4♥ N 5 ♣8 11-Feller-Bellinger vs 6-Hannaford-Lundgreen
620 2.00 2.00 4♥ N 4 ♣8 2-Olson-Olson vs 7-Williams-Tadken
500 1.00 3.00 4♠* W -3 ♦K 12-Poriss-Greenlee vs 4-Ainbinder-Barish
200 0.00 4.00 4♥* N -1 ♣8 3-Hollister-Hollister vs 1-Besteman-Mix
|
13 |
♠T985
♥AQ84
♦875
♣KJ
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
♠AK6
♥762
♦KQ9
♣Q982
|
♠J7
♥KT3
♦AT6432
♣T5
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♥ 3♠ ♦4 NT4 |
EW: 3♦ 3NT ♣6 ♥5 ♠4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 3.50 0.50 2♦ E 3 ♠2 4-Ainbinder-Barish vs 2-Olson-Olson
110 3.50 0.50 2♦ E 3 ♣A 9-Lean-Lean vs 6-Hannaford-Lundgreen
130 2.00 2.00 2♦ E 4 ♣A 1-Besteman-Mix vs 10-Waterman-Waterman
150 1.00 3.00 1N W 3 ♠5 7-Williams-Tadken vs 11-Feller-Bellinger
210 0.00 4.00 1N W 5 ♥4 3-Hollister-Hollister vs 8-Hedberg-Bujanovich
|
14 |
♠JT5
♥AQ94
♦K97
♣A94
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
♠642
♥85
♦T8
♣QT8652
|
♠Q97
♥JT32
♦AQJ4
♣K3
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1/-♣ 3♦ 3/2♥ 3♠ 3NT ♣7/5 |
EW: ♣6 ♦4 ♥4 ♠4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 4.00 0.00 1♠ S 3 ♦T 9-Lean-Lean vs 6-Hannaford-Lundgreen
120 3.00 1.00 2N N 2 ♦4 7-Williams-Tadken vs 11-Feller-Bellinger
110 2.00 2.00 2♥ S 2 ♦7 1-Besteman-Mix vs 10-Waterman-Waterman
100 1.00 3.00 1♦ E -2 ♠K 3-Hollister-Hollister vs 8-Hedberg-Bujanovich
50 0.00 4.00 2♣ W -1 ♠J 4-Ainbinder-Barish vs 2-Olson-Olson
|
15 |
♠5
♥543
♦7642
♣AQ972
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
♠Q987
♥K76
♦85
♣K643
|
♠AJ632
♥J82
♦KJ9
♣J5
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 5♦ 4/5♥ 1♠ 2NT |
EW: ♣3 ♦2 ♥2 ♠6 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 4.00 0.00 3♠ E -3 ♣T 9-Lean-Lean vs 6-Hannaford-Lundgreen
100 3.00 1.00 3♠ E -2 ♣T 4-Ainbinder-Barish vs 2-Olson-Olson
100 1.50 2.50 1N S -1 ♠7 1-Besteman-Mix vs 10-Waterman-Waterman
100 1.50 2.50 3♥ S -1 ♠9 3-Hollister-Hollister vs 8-Hedberg-Bujanovich
110 0.00 4.00 2♠ E 2 ♣8 7-Williams-Tadken vs 11-Feller-Bellinger
|
16 |
♠K75
♥QJ84
♦KQT
♣Q32
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
♠J2
♥A97632
♦72
♣976
|
♠A984
♥5
♦A63
♣AJT54
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 1♠ ♣5 ♥6 NT6 |
EW: 2♣ 1♥ ♦5 ♠6/5 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 4.00 0.00 2♥ W -2 ♦K 4-Ainbinder-Barish vs 9-Lean-Lean
150 3.00 1.00 1N N 3 ♦3 12-Poriss-Greenlee vs 6-Hannaford-Lundgreen
50 1.50 2.50 1N N -1 ♦3 8-Hedberg-Bujanovich vs 11-Feller-Bellinger
50 1.50 2.50 3♠ S -1 ♦7 1-Besteman-Mix vs 7-Williams-Tadken
150 0.00 4.00 3♠ S -3 ♣7 2-Olson-Olson vs 10-Waterman-Waterman
|
17 |
♠32
♥64
♦K942
♣AQT93
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
♠KJ9
♥AKT3
♦A865
♣K7
|
♠QT74
♥87
♦JT73
♣J52
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ -/1♥ ♦4 ♥6/7 ♠5 NT5/6 |
EW: 2/3♦ 1♠ 1NT ♣5 ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 4.00 0.00 1♥ S 2 ♦A 1-Besteman-Mix vs 7-Williams-Tadken
50 3.00 1.00 3♦ W -1 ♠3 8-Hedberg-Bujanovich vs 11-Feller-Bellinger
50 2.00 2.00 2♥ S -1 ♦A 4-Ainbinder-Barish vs 9-Lean-Lean
90 1.00 3.00 1N W 1 ♥6 2-Olson-Olson vs 10-Waterman-Waterman
100 0.00 4.00 3♣ N -2 ♦J 12-Poriss-Greenlee vs 6-Hannaford-Lundgreen
|
18 |
♠T32
♥Q982
♦KQ43
♣T9
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
♠KQ54
♥K74
♦962
♣653
|
♠AJ986
♥6
♦A85
♣J742
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 3♦ 4♥ ♠5 NT6 |
EW: 1♠ ♣5 ♦4 ♥3 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
620 3.50 0.50 4♥ S 4 ♠K 1-Besteman-Mix vs 7-Williams-Tadken
620 3.50 0.50 4♥ S 4 ♠K 2-Olson-Olson vs 10-Waterman-Waterman
300 2.00 2.00 4♠* E -2 ♣A 12-Poriss-Greenlee vs 6-Hannaford-Lundgreen
170 1.00 3.00 3♥ S 4 ♠K 8-Hedberg-Bujanovich vs 11-Feller-Bellinger
100 0.00 4.00 4♠ E -2 ♣A 4-Ainbinder-Barish vs 9-Lean-Lean
|
19 |
♠AT42
♥J9
♦J7
♣KQJT6
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
♠KJ9
♥KQ87654
♦8
♣72
|
♠Q86
♥T2
♦QT
♣A98543
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♦ 3♠ 4NT ♣6 ♥5 |
EW: 1/-♣ 2♥ ♣7/5 ♦3/1 ♠4 NT3/1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
430 4.00 0.00 3N S 4 ♥8 11-Feller-Bellinger vs 9-Lean-Lean
400 3.00 1.00 5♦ S 5 ♥K 10-Waterman-Waterman vs 3-Hollister-Hollister
50 1.50 2.50 5♦ S -1 ♥K 6-Hannaford-Lundgreen vs 4-Ainbinder-Barish
50 1.50 2.50 5♦ S -1 ♥K 12-Poriss-Greenlee vs 7-Williams-Tadken
100 0.00 4.00 5♦ S -2 ♥K 2-Olson-Olson vs 8-Hedberg-Bujanovich
|
20 |
♠AQ4
♥K7
♦96
♣KT8753
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
♠73
♥AJ852
♦KQ743
♣6
|
♠965
♥643
♦AT2
♣AQ42
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 2♠ ♦3 ♥3 NT5 |
EW: 3♦ 3♥ 2NT ♣5 ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 4.00 0.00 2♠ S 2 ♣6 2-Olson-Olson vs 8-Hedberg-Bujanovich
90 2.50 1.50 2♣ N 2 ♦2 12-Poriss-Greenlee vs 7-Williams-Tadken
90 2.50 1.50 2♣ N 2 ♣J 6-Hannaford-Lundgreen vs 4-Ainbinder-Barish
100 1.00 3.00 3♠ S -1 ♣J 10-Waterman-Waterman vs 3-Hollister-Hollister
140 0.00 4.00 2♥ E 3 ♣J 11-Feller-Bellinger vs 9-Lean-Lean
|
21 |
♠KJ9
♥JT
♦KQ7653
♣K2
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
♠876
♥K962
♦98
♣AT54
|
♠T32
♥854
♦AT2
♣QJ63
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 4/5♦ 3♥ 4♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣6 ♦2 ♥4 ♠3 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
660 4.00 0.00 3N S 5 ♣4 10-Waterman-Waterman vs 3-Hollister-Hollister
650 3.00 1.00 4♠ S 5 ♦9 2-Olson-Olson vs 8-Hedberg-Bujanovich
600 2.00 2.00 3N N 3 ♣3 11-Feller-Bellinger vs 9-Lean-Lean
150 1.00 3.00 3♦ N 5 ♣3 12-Poriss-Greenlee vs 7-Williams-Tadken
200 0.00 4.00 3N S -2 ♣5 6-Hannaford-Lundgreen vs 4-Ainbinder-Barish
|
22 |
♠A85
♥KJ92
♦9632
♣42
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
♠KT73
♥84
♦AQJT54
♣3
|
♠J2
♥QT65
♦K
♣AKQT95
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4 ♦3 ♥5 ♠5 NT3 |
EW: 3♣ 3♦ 2♥ 2♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 4.00 0.00 3♣ E 3 ♠4 11-Feller-Bellinger vs 1-Besteman-Mix
600 3.00 1.00 3N E 3 ♦8 12-Poriss-Greenlee vs 8-Hedberg-Bujanovich
630 2.00 2.00 3N E 4 ♥3 10-Waterman-Waterman vs 4-Ainbinder-Barish
660 1.00 3.00 3N E 5 ♠4 3-Hollister-Hollister vs 9-Lean-Lean
720 0.00 4.00 3N E 7 ♠4 6-Hannaford-Lundgreen vs 2-Olson-Olson
|
23 |
♠Q
♥KJT3
♦T975
♣Q864
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
♠832
♥AQ92
♦KQ8
♣K53
|
♠AJT75
♥765
♦4
♣T972
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2/3♦ 1♥ 1NT ♣6 ♠6 |
EW: -/1♣ 1♠ ♣6/7 ♦4 ♥6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 4.00 0.00 3♠* E -1 ♦A 3-Hollister-Hollister vs 9-Lean-Lean
110 3.00 1.00 2♦ S 3 ♣3 11-Feller-Bellinger vs 1-Besteman-Mix
90 1.00 3.00 2♦ S 2 ♠A 6-Hannaford-Lundgreen vs 2-Olson-Olson
90 1.00 3.00 2♦ S 2 ♠8 12-Poriss-Greenlee vs 8-Hedberg-Bujanovich
90 1.00 3.00 2♦ S 2 ♠4 10-Waterman-Waterman vs 4-Ainbinder-Barish
|
24 |
♠AT85
♥84
♦QT852
♣T8
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
♠72
♥QJ96
♦74
♣KQ543
|
♠J9
♥AT7
♦A963
♣A976
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 3♠ ♣4 ♥4 NT6 |
EW: 3♣ 2♥ 1NT ♦4 ♠4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 3.50 0.50 3♠ S 3 ♣K 10-Waterman-Waterman vs 4-Ainbinder-Barish
140 3.50 0.50 1♠ S 3 ♣K 3-Hollister-Hollister vs 9-Lean-Lean
110 2.00 2.00 2♠ S 2 ♦7 12-Poriss-Greenlee vs 8-Hedberg-Bujanovich
50 1.00 3.00 3♥ E -1 ♣T 11-Feller-Bellinger vs 1-Besteman-Mix
110 0.00 4.00 3♣ W 3 ♥2 6-Hannaford-Lundgreen vs 2-Olson-Olson
|
25 |
♠82
♥73
♦AKQJT8
♣754
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
♠T
♥JT9864
♦9764
♣83
|
♠Q53
♥A52
♦53
♣AQT92
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 5♦ 4♠ 5NT ♥5 |
EW: 2♥ ♣6 ♦0 ♠3/0 NT0 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
450 3.00 1.00 4♠ S 5 ♥J 2-Olson-Olson vs 11-Feller-Bellinger
450 3.00 1.00 4♠ S 5 ♥J 4-Ainbinder-Barish vs 1-Besteman-Mix
450 3.00 1.00 4♠ S 5 ♣4 12-Poriss-Greenlee vs 9-Lean-Lean
420 1.00 3.00 4♠ S 4 ♣8 7-Williams-Tadken vs 3-Hollister-Hollister
50 0.00 4.00 4♠ S -1 ♣8 8-Hedberg-Bujanovich vs 6-Hannaford-Lundgreen
|
26 |
♠754
♥A62
♦A7632
♣KT
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
♠AKJ
♥Q9543
♦94
♣932
|
♠QT9832
♥JT
♦K8
♣AJ4
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 4♦ ♥6 ♠4 NT5 |
EW: 1♥ 3♠ 2NT ♣4 ♦3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
130 4.00 0.00 2♦ N 4 ♠2 7-Williams-Tadken vs 3-Hollister-Hollister
100 2.50 1.50 4♠ E -1 ♦Q 12-Poriss-Greenlee vs 9-Lean-Lean
100 2.50 1.50 3♠ E -1 ♦Q 8-Hedberg-Bujanovich vs 6-Hannaford-Lundgreen
170 1.00 3.00 3♥ W 4 ♦A 2-Olson-Olson vs 11-Feller-Bellinger
620 0.00 4.00 4♠ E 4 ♦Q 4-Ainbinder-Barish vs 1-Besteman-Mix
|
27 |
♠93
♥AT943
♦JT753
♣8
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
♠KQJ4
♥K
♦A2
♣KQJ974
|
♠8762
♥Q852
♦KQ6
♣T6
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 1♥ ♣2 ♠3 NT4 |
EW: 4♣ 3♠ 3NT ♦5 ♥5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 3.50 0.50 4♠ W -1 ♥A 2-Olson-Olson vs 11-Feller-Bellinger
50 3.50 0.50 4♠ W -1 ♣8 8-Hedberg-Bujanovich vs 6-Hannaford-Lundgreen
130 1.50 2.50 3♣ W 4 ♠9 4-Ainbinder-Barish vs 1-Besteman-Mix
130 1.50 2.50 1♣ W 4 ♥3 7-Williams-Tadken vs 3-Hollister-Hollister
430 0.00 4.00 3N W 4 ♦J 12-Poriss-Greenlee vs 9-Lean-Lean
|