1 |
♠9743
♥KQ9872
♦AQ
♣5
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
♠J
♥A4
♦K9832
♣AJ963
|
♠85
♥JT5
♦J765
♣KT82
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♥ 5♠ 1NT ♣4 ♦4 |
EW: 3♣ 3♦ ♥2 ♠2 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
480 3.50 0.50 4♠ S 6 ♥A 5-Hedberg-Juers vs 2-Hall-Gilbreath
480 3.50 0.50 4♠ S 6 ♥A 9-Hollister-Hollister vs 7-Ainbinder-Barish
450 2.00 2.00 4♠ S 5 ♦3 3-Williams-Tadken vs 11-Gasperini-Brackett
420 1.00 3.00 4♠ S 4 ♣A 12-Jentzer-Matthews vs 1-Olson-Olson
100 0.00 4.00 5♦ W -2 ♥K 6-Lean-Lean vs 10-Waterman-Waterman
|
2 |
♠9753
♥63
♦KQJ32
♣J3
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
♠AKQT
♥A974
♦T
♣T976
|
♠4
♥KQT82
♦A965
♣KQ5
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣1 ♦4 ♥0 ♠1 NT1 |
EW: 5♣ 3♦ 6♥ 4♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 4.00 0.00 3♦ W -1 ♣J 3-Williams-Tadken vs 11-Gasperini-Brackett
480 2.00 2.00 4♥ E 6 ♠J 6-Lean-Lean vs 10-Waterman-Waterman
480 2.00 2.00 4♥ E 6 ♠2 12-Jentzer-Matthews vs 1-Olson-Olson
480 2.00 2.00 4♥ E 6 ♥J 9-Hollister-Hollister vs 7-Ainbinder-Barish
980 0.00 4.00 6♥ E 6 ♣A 5-Hedberg-Juers vs 2-Hall-Gilbreath
|
3 |
♠4
♥KQJ542
♦T8
♣K865
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
♠T32
♥-
♦QJ6532
♣J972
|
♠AKQ96
♥T976
♦AK
♣AT
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♥ 1NT ♣5 ♦1 ♠2 |
EW: 2/1♣ 5♦ 5♠ ♥5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.50 0.50 4♠ E -1 ♥A 5-Hedberg-Juers vs 2-Hall-Gilbreath
100 3.50 0.50 3♠ E -1 ♥A 3-Williams-Tadken vs 11-Gasperini-Brackett
200 2.00 2.00 1♠ E 5 ♥3 9-Hollister-Hollister vs 7-Ainbinder-Barish
620 1.00 3.00 4♠ E 4 ♥A 12-Jentzer-Matthews vs 1-Olson-Olson
650 0.00 4.00 4♠ E 5 ♥A 6-Lean-Lean vs 10-Waterman-Waterman
|
4 |
♠J7
♥Q86
♦A4
♣K98764
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
♠T53
♥AJ752
♦K86
♣Q3
|
♠AKQ84
♥93
♦J753
♣A5
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ ♦5 ♥3/4 ♠3 NT5 |
EW: 2♦ 3♥ 3/4♠ 1/2NT ♣5/6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 4.00 0.00 4♠ E -2 ♠6 9-Hollister-Hollister vs 5-Hedberg-Juers
110 3.00 1.00 2♠ E 2 ♥4 6-Lean-Lean vs 3-Williams-Tadken
140 2.00 2.00 2♠ E 3 ♦2 11-Gasperini-Brackett vs 4-Hannaford-Lundgreen
300 1.00 3.00 3♦ S -3 ♠T 12-Jentzer-Matthews vs 2-Hall-Gilbreath
620 0.00 4.00 4♠ E 4 ♣J 7-Ainbinder-Barish vs 10-Waterman-Waterman
|
5 |
♠A7
♥KQJ864
♦T76
♣A3
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
♠KJT3
♥72
♦984
♣8754
|
♠Q8642
♥T3
♦AKQ53
♣6
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 5♥ 2NT ♦4 ♠4 |
EW: 3♦ 3♠ ♣0 ♥0 NT0 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
650 3.00 1.00 4♥ N 5 ♦A 7-Ainbinder-Barish vs 10-Waterman-Waterman
650 3.00 1.00 4♥ N 5 ♦A 11-Gasperini-Brackett vs 4-Hannaford-Lundgreen
650 3.00 1.00 4♥ N 5 ♦4 6-Lean-Lean vs 3-Williams-Tadken
140 1.00 3.00 3♥ N 3 ♦A 9-Hollister-Hollister vs 5-Hedberg-Juers
50 0.00 4.00 4♠ E -1 ♣K 12-Jentzer-Matthews vs 2-Hall-Gilbreath
|
6 |
♠KQJ
♥J85
♦JT654
♣94
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
♠T732
♥Q93
♦K983
♣72
|
♠A9864
♥KT
♦2
♣AKJT5
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 1♥ ♣5 ♠4 NT6 |
EW: 1♣ 3♠ 1NT ♦5 ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.50 0.50 4♠ E -1 ♠5 7-Ainbinder-Barish vs 10-Waterman-Waterman
100 3.50 0.50 4♠ E -1 ♦A 12-Jentzer-Matthews vs 2-Hall-Gilbreath
110 2.00 2.00 2♠ E 2 ♠5 9-Hollister-Hollister vs 5-Hedberg-Juers
140 1.00 3.00 3♠ E 3 ♣3 11-Gasperini-Brackett vs 4-Hannaford-Lundgreen
150 0.00 4.00 3♥ S -3 ♠T 6-Lean-Lean vs 3-Williams-Tadken
|
7 |
♠AQ863
♥AJ
♦763
♣872
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
♠K9
♥6
♦KQT984
♣AQJT
|
♠J54
♥T732
♦AJ2
♣K64
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♥ 1♠ ♣3 ♦3 NT3 |
EW: 4♣ 4♦ 2NT ♥5 ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
130 2.50 1.50 4♦ W 4 ♥A 1-Olson-Olson vs 6-Lean-Lean
130 2.50 1.50 4♦ W 4 ♥A 2-Hall-Gilbreath vs 9-Hollister-Hollister
130 2.50 1.50 3♦ W 4 ♥A 7-Ainbinder-Barish vs 4-Hannaford-Lundgreen
130 2.50 1.50 3♦ W 4 ♥A 12-Jentzer-Matthews vs 3-Williams-Tadken
150 0.00 4.00 3♦ W 5 ♥A 11-Gasperini-Brackett vs 5-Hedberg-Juers
|
8 |
♠J964
♥T653
♦853
♣Q9
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
♠K873
♥Q942
♦A9
♣853
|
♠AQ
♥A8
♦QJ42
♣AT642
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦4 ♥4 ♠4 NT3 |
EW: 4♣ 3♦ 3♥ 3♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 3.50 0.50 3N E -1 ♦6 11-Gasperini-Brackett vs 5-Hedberg-Juers
50 3.50 0.50 3♣ E -1 ♠T 2-Hall-Gilbreath vs 9-Hollister-Hollister
120 2.00 2.00 2N E 2 ♦6 12-Jentzer-Matthews vs 3-Williams-Tadken
400 1.00 3.00 3N W 3 ♠4 7-Ainbinder-Barish vs 4-Hannaford-Lundgreen
430 0.00 4.00 3N E 4 ♦6 1-Olson-Olson vs 6-Lean-Lean
|
9 |
♠42
♥AKT62
♦843
♣KQ4
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
♠KQT
♥97
♦AQ975
♣AT9
|
♠96
♥QJ5
♦KJT2
♣7652
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♥ 2♠ ♣5 ♦5 NT5 |
EW: 1♣ 2♦ 2NT ♥4 ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 3.00 1.00 2♠ S 3 ♥9 2-Hall-Gilbreath vs 9-Hollister-Hollister
140 3.00 1.00 3♥ N 3 ♦K 1-Olson-Olson vs 6-Lean-Lean
140 3.00 1.00 3♥ N 3 ♦K 7-Ainbinder-Barish vs 4-Hannaford-Lundgreen
110 1.00 3.00 2♠ S 2 ♦A 12-Jentzer-Matthews vs 3-Williams-Tadken
110 0.00 4.00 3♦ E 3 ♥8 11-Gasperini-Brackett vs 5-Hedberg-Juers
|
10 |
♠Q872
♥A2
♦AKQ
♣Q832
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
♠3
♥QJ98653
♦-
♣KJ975
|
♠AJ964
♥T
♦T432
♣AT6
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♦ 2♠ 3NT ♣3 ♥3 |
EW: 3♣ 4♥ ♦3 ♠5 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 4.00 0.00 3♥* W -1 ♦A 12-Jentzer-Matthews vs 4-Hannaford-Lundgreen
130 2.50 1.50 3♦ S 4 ♥Q 11-Gasperini-Brackett vs 6-Lean-Lean
130 2.50 1.50 2♦ S 4 ♥Q 10-Waterman-Waterman vs 9-Hollister-Hollister
200 0.50 3.50 3♥ W 5 ♦A 3-Williams-Tadken vs 1-Olson-Olson
200 0.50 3.50 5♦* N -1 ♦2 2-Hall-Gilbreath vs 7-Ainbinder-Barish
|
11 |
♠T9
♥T93
♦AKJ75
♣Q93
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
♠J86
♥52
♦93
♣KJT872
|
♠AKQ5
♥AKJ74
♦T64
♣5
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ ♣4 ♥4 ♠3 NT6 |
EW: 3♣ 3♥ 3♠ 1NT ♦5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 3.50 0.50 3N W -3 ♦K 3-Williams-Tadken vs 1-Olson-Olson
150 3.50 0.50 4♥ E -3 ♦2 12-Jentzer-Matthews vs 4-Hannaford-Lundgreen
100 2.00 2.00 2♥ E -2 ♠4 10-Waterman-Waterman vs 9-Hollister-Hollister
110 1.00 3.00 2♥ E 2 ♦2 11-Gasperini-Brackett vs 6-Lean-Lean
140 0.00 4.00 3♠ E 3 ♦2 2-Hall-Gilbreath vs 7-Ainbinder-Barish
|
12 |
♠QT73
♥A3
♦52
♣AQ842
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
♠KJ85
♥QJ842
♦J83
♣K
|
♠9642
♥975
♦AK7
♣753
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 4♦ 1♥ 1♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣2 ♦3 ♥6 ♠6 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
600 4.00 0.00 3N S 3 ♥4 2-Hall-Gilbreath vs 7-Ainbinder-Barish
180 3.00 1.00 1N S 4 ♥4 12-Jentzer-Matthews vs 4-Hannaford-Lundgreen
150 1.50 2.50 3♣ N 5 ♥5 10-Waterman-Waterman vs 9-Hollister-Hollister
150 1.50 2.50 2♣ N 5 ♥9 3-Williams-Tadken vs 1-Olson-Olson
100 0.00 4.00 1N S -1 ♥Q 11-Gasperini-Brackett vs 6-Lean-Lean
|
13 |
♠AK6
♥KJT93
♦5
♣T932
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
♠2
♥A87654
♦T943
♣J5
|
♠98543
♥-
♦KQJ762
♣A4
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 1♥ 3♠ ♦3 NT6 |
EW: 3♦ ♣2 ♥5 ♠3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 4.00 0.00 2♥ W -2 ♠4 4-Hannaford-Lundgreen vs 2-Hall-Gilbreath
130 3.00 1.00 3♣ S 4 ♦T 7-Ainbinder-Barish vs 11-Gasperini-Brackett
200 1.50 2.50 3♥ N -2 ♦K 1-Olson-Olson vs 10-Waterman-Waterman
200 1.50 2.50 3♥ N -2 ♦K 12-Jentzer-Matthews vs 5-Hedberg-Juers
800 0.00 4.00 4♥* N -3 ♦K 9-Hollister-Hollister vs 6-Lean-Lean
|
14 |
♠A53
♥AK943
♦96
♣AJ8
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
♠J84
♥J7
♦KJ32
♣7654
|
♠K72
♥85
♦Q85
♣QT932
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 3♦ 5♥ 5♠ 4NT |
EW: ♣5 ♦3 ♥1 ♠2 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
450 2.00 2.00 4♥ N 5 ♥8 7-Ainbinder-Barish vs 11-Gasperini-Brackett
450 2.00 2.00 4♥ N 5 ♣T 4-Hannaford-Lundgreen vs 2-Hall-Gilbreath
450 2.00 2.00 4♥ N 5 ♣9 1-Olson-Olson vs 10-Waterman-Waterman
450 2.00 2.00 4♥ N 5 ♣3 9-Hollister-Hollister vs 6-Lean-Lean
450 2.00 2.00 4♥ N 5 ♣3 12-Jentzer-Matthews vs 5-Hedberg-Juers
|
15 |
♠92
♥Q83
♦JT972
♣872
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
♠J8
♥KJ2
♦85
♣KQJ965
|
♠KT765
♥96
♦K643
♣T3
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 3♦ 4♥ 1♠ 1NT |
EW: ♣6 ♦4 ♥3 ♠5 NT5/4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 4.00 0.00 3♣ W -3 ♦J 12-Jentzer-Matthews vs 5-Hedberg-Juers
140 3.00 1.00 2♥ S 3 ♣K 9-Hollister-Hollister vs 6-Lean-Lean
200 1.00 3.00 2N S -2 ♣K 1-Olson-Olson vs 10-Waterman-Waterman
200 1.00 3.00 2N S -2 ♣K 4-Hannaford-Lundgreen vs 2-Hall-Gilbreath
200 1.00 3.00 2N S -2 ♣K 7-Ainbinder-Barish vs 11-Gasperini-Brackett
|
16 |
♠JT54
♥J7
♦T97
♣K732
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
♠AK3
♥AQ98
♦J3
♣JT84
|
♠Q9872
♥432
♦Q4
♣Q65
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♦ 1♥ 2NT ♣6 ♠5 |
EW: 1♣ 1♠ ♦3 ♥6 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
300 4.00 0.00 2♥ W -3 ♦T 5-Hedberg-Juers vs 3-Williams-Tadken
200 2.50 1.50 3♠ W -2 ♦A 12-Jentzer-Matthews vs 6-Lean-Lean
200 2.50 1.50 3♠ W -2 ♦T 1-Olson-Olson vs 7-Ainbinder-Barish
130 0.50 3.50 3♦ S 4 ♠K 2-Hall-Gilbreath vs 10-Waterman-Waterman
130 0.50 3.50 2♦ S 4 ♠A 4-Hannaford-Lundgreen vs 9-Hollister-Hollister
|
17 |
♠5
♥K872
♦AJT4
♣KQ92
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
♠AQJ4
♥Q954
♦5
♣A854
|
♠T8632
♥T63
♦973
♣JT
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3/4♣ 5♦ 1/2♥ 2NT ♠5/6 |
EW: 1♠ ♣3 ♦2 ♥5 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
430 4.00 0.00 3N S 4 ♠Q 2-Hall-Gilbreath vs 10-Waterman-Waterman
400 2.50 1.50 3N N 3 ♠3 12-Jentzer-Matthews vs 6-Lean-Lean
400 2.50 1.50 5♦ N 5 ♣J 1-Olson-Olson vs 7-Ainbinder-Barish
150 1.00 3.00 4♦ N 5 ♠4 4-Hannaford-Lundgreen vs 9-Hollister-Hollister
130 0.00 4.00 3♦ N 4 ♣T 5-Hedberg-Juers vs 3-Williams-Tadken
|
18 |
♠KQJ
♥A
♦Q7
♣AKJT832
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
♠T9754
♥97
♦A84
♣954
|
♠A
♥KQ8643
♦T952
♣76
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 1♦ 2♠ 3NT ♥6 |
EW: ♣2 ♦5 ♥6 ♠4 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
600 4.00 0.00 5♣ N 5 ♥3 4-Hannaford-Lundgreen vs 9-Hollister-Hollister
150 3.00 1.00 3♣ N 5 ♠A 5-Hedberg-Juers vs 3-Williams-Tadken
100 2.00 2.00 5♣ N -1 ♥K 2-Hall-Gilbreath vs 10-Waterman-Waterman
200 1.00 3.00 4♠ S -2 ♥9 1-Olson-Olson vs 7-Ainbinder-Barish
300 0.00 4.00 4♠ N -3 ♥9 12-Jentzer-Matthews vs 6-Lean-Lean
|
19 |
♠KQT53
♥J9
♦KT974
♣2
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
♠9
♥T72
♦Q8
♣K987643
|
♠A762
♥Q63
♦J652
♣AJ
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 3♥ 4♠ 3NT ♣5 |
EW: 1♣ ♦3 ♥4/3 ♠2 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
180 4.00 0.00 1N S 4 ♣7 12-Jentzer-Matthews vs 7-Ainbinder-Barish
170 3.00 1.00 2♠ N 4 ♣A 10-Waterman-Waterman vs 3-Williams-Tadken
150 2.00 2.00 2N S 3 ♣7 5-Hedberg-Juers vs 1-Olson-Olson
140 1.00 3.00 2♠ N 3 ♠6 11-Gasperini-Brackett vs 9-Hollister-Hollister
50 0.00 4.00 2♥ S -1 ♠9 6-Lean-Lean vs 4-Hannaford-Lundgreen
|
20 |
♠AKJ95
♥4
♦T74
♣Q985
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
♠863
♥J752
♦AK
♣JT42
|
♠T7
♥AKQT93
♦Q652
♣6
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 2♠ ♦4 ♥3 NT4 |
EW: 4♥ ♣4 ♦6 ♠4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
400 4.00 0.00 3♦ W -4 ♠A 6-Lean-Lean vs 4-Hannaford-Lundgreen
PASS 3.00 1.00 Pass Out 11-Gasperini-Brackett vs 9-Hollister-Hollister
170 2.00 2.00 3♥ E 4 ♠2 5-Hedberg-Juers vs 1-Olson-Olson
200 1.00 3.00 3♥ E 5 ♣A 12-Jentzer-Matthews vs 7-Ainbinder-Barish
620 0.00 4.00 4♥ E 4 ♣A 10-Waterman-Waterman vs 3-Williams-Tadken
|
21 |
♠54
♥AQJ7
♦AQ743
♣95
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
♠QJ72
♥84
♦KT62
♣A64
|
♠K863
♥6532
♦85
♣J83
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 4♦ 5♥ 2♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣1 ♦1 ♥1 ♠5 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
660 4.00 0.00 3N S 5 ♥8 10-Waterman-Waterman vs 3-Williams-Tadken
600 3.00 1.00 3N S 3 ♠2 11-Gasperini-Brackett vs 9-Hollister-Hollister
120 2.00 2.00 2N S 2 ♠2 5-Hedberg-Juers vs 1-Olson-Olson
100 1.00 3.00 3N S -1 ♠2 12-Jentzer-Matthews vs 7-Ainbinder-Barish
200 0.00 4.00 3N N -2 ♠4 6-Lean-Lean vs 4-Hannaford-Lundgreen
|
22 |
♠9852
♥K94
♦AK9
♣AQ9
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
♠AQJ
♥QT73
♦Q86
♣874
|
♠T763
♥J865
♦T72
♣J5
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 4♦ 1♥ 1/2♠ 3/4NT |
EW: ♣3 ♦3 ♥6 ♠5 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
430 4.00 0.00 3N N 4 ♥4 10-Waterman-Waterman vs 4-Hannaford-Lundgreen
400 2.50 1.50 3N N 3 ♥5 7-Ainbinder-Barish vs 5-Hedberg-Juers
400 2.50 1.50 3N N 3 ♥4 6-Lean-Lean vs 2-Hall-Gilbreath
150 0.50 3.50 2N N 3 ♣J 11-Gasperini-Brackett vs 1-Olson-Olson
150 0.50 3.50 2♣ N 5 ♥5 3-Williams-Tadken vs 9-Hollister-Hollister
|
23 |
♠T4
♥AT9
♦A98653
♣T4
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
♠A853
♥75
♦KQJ4
♣Q73
|
♠KQJ7
♥KQ82
♦T7
♣KJ6
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦5 ♥5/4 ♠3 NT3 |
EW: 1♣ 2♦ 1♥ 3♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.00 1.00 4♠ W -1 ♦A 10-Waterman-Waterman vs 4-Hannaford-Lundgreen
100 3.00 1.00 4♠ E -1 ♦2 7-Ainbinder-Barish vs 5-Hedberg-Juers
100 3.00 1.00 4♠ E -1 ♦2 11-Gasperini-Brackett vs 1-Olson-Olson
PASS 1.00 3.00 Pass Out 3-Williams-Tadken vs 9-Hollister-Hollister
150 0.00 4.00 1N E 3 ♣5 6-Lean-Lean vs 2-Hall-Gilbreath
|
24 |
♠QJ5
♥QJ954
♦-
♣AT964
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
♠9643
♥T863
♦KT962
♣-
|
♠T872
♥AK
♦AQ5
♣Q873
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 2♥ 1NT ♦4 ♠4 |
EW: 3♦ 3/2♠ ♣2 ♥4 NT6/5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 4.00 0.00 3♣ N 5 ♠4 10-Waterman-Waterman vs 4-Hannaford-Lundgreen
100 3.00 1.00 2N E -2 ♥4 6-Lean-Lean vs 2-Hall-Gilbreath
50 2.00 2.00 3N S -1 ♠6 3-Williams-Tadken vs 9-Hollister-Hollister
110 0.50 3.50 2♠ E 2 ♥7 7-Ainbinder-Barish vs 5-Hedberg-Juers
110 0.50 3.50 2♠ E 2 ♦4 11-Gasperini-Brackett vs 1-Olson-Olson
|
25 |
♠K32
♥K
♦J7654
♣T872
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
♠75
♥A752
♦KT9
♣AQ63
|
♠AQJ
♥QJT943
♦82
♣K4
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣2 ♦4 ♥1 ♠4 NT1 |
EW: 5♣ 2♦ 6♥ 3♠ 6NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
PASS 4.00 0.00 Pass Out 12-Jentzer-Matthews vs 9-Hollister-Hollister
650 2.50 1.50 4♥ W 5 ♠T 4-Hannaford-Lundgreen vs 1-Olson-Olson
650 2.50 1.50 4♥ E 5 ♠6 7-Ainbinder-Barish vs 3-Williams-Tadken
680 1.00 3.00 4♥ E 6 ♠T 5-Hedberg-Juers vs 10-Waterman-Waterman
710 0.00 4.00 4♥ E 7 ♠T 2-Hall-Gilbreath vs 11-Gasperini-Brackett
|
26 |
♠AQT3
♥AJT3
♦Q763
♣A
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
♠K54
♥Q854
♦954
♣652
|
♠98762
♥K962
♦K2
♣98
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 7♣ 7♦ 3♥ 4♠ 7NT |
EW: ♣0 ♦0 ♥3 ♠3 NT0 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
720 3.50 0.50 3N N 7 ♠9 5-Hedberg-Juers vs 10-Waterman-Waterman
720 3.50 0.50 3N N 7 ♥9 12-Jentzer-Matthews vs 9-Hollister-Hollister
660 2.00 2.00 3N N 5 ♥8 7-Ainbinder-Barish vs 3-Williams-Tadken
640 1.00 3.00 5♣ S 7 ♥4 2-Hall-Gilbreath vs 11-Gasperini-Brackett
190 0.00 4.00 4♣ S 7 ♦9 4-Hannaford-Lundgreen vs 1-Olson-Olson
|
27 |
♠QJ5
♥85
♦KT8
♣J8532
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
♠K8
♥Q976
♦J643
♣A94
|
♠T642
♥AK432
♦Q5
♣Q7
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1/2♣ 1♦ 1♠ ♥4 NT6 |
EW: 3♥ 1/-NT ♣5/4 ♦6 ♠5 NT7/6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
430 4.00 0.00 3N N 4 ♣Q 12-Jentzer-Matthews vs 9-Hollister-Hollister
90 2.50 1.50 1N N 1 ♥2 5-Hedberg-Juers vs 10-Waterman-Waterman
90 2.50 1.50 1♦ S 2 ♠K 7-Ainbinder-Barish vs 3-Williams-Tadken
50 1.00 3.00 3♥ E -1 ♣6 2-Hall-Gilbreath vs 11-Gasperini-Brackett
170 0.00 4.00 2♥ W 4 ♠3 4-Hannaford-Lundgreen vs 1-Olson-Olson
|