1 |
♠852
♥AJ2
♦JT95
♣J43
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
♠AJ73
♥8763
♦8432
♣K
|
♠KT964
♥T54
♦K7
♣QT8
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 3♦ 2♥ 2NT ♠6 |
EW: 1♠ ♣3 ♦4 ♥5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
130 3.00 1.00 3♣ S 4 ♠A 6-Ainbinder-Barish vs 5-Brackett-Gasperini
130 3.00 1.00 3♣ S 4 ♠7 10-Greenlee-Poriss vs 8-Williams-Tadken
130 3.00 1.00 3♣ S 4 ♥8 7-Waterman-Waterman vs 3-Hedberg-Jentzer
50 1.00 3.00 3N N -1 ♠6 4-Bujanovich-Thompson vs 1-Gilbreath-Hall
110 0.00 4.00 2♠ E 2 ♥K 9-Olson-Olson vs 2-Lean-Lean
|
2 |
♠72
♥K7654
♦Q72
♣A83
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
♠AKJ54
♥J
♦A96
♣T962
|
♠T
♥AQT93
♦T84
♣KJ75
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣2 ♦5/4 ♥4 ♠5 NT5 |
EW: 4♣ 2♦ 3♥ 2♠ 2NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 4.00 0.00 2♠ W -1 ♦2 10-Greenlee-Poriss vs 8-Williams-Tadken
90 3.00 1.00 1N E 1 ♦3 7-Waterman-Waterman vs 3-Hedberg-Jentzer
110 2.00 2.00 2♠ W 2 ♣A 9-Olson-Olson vs 2-Lean-Lean
300 0.50 3.50 2♥ N -3 ♠T 4-Bujanovich-Thompson vs 1-Gilbreath-Hall
300 0.50 3.50 2♥ N -3 ♠T 6-Ainbinder-Barish vs 5-Brackett-Gasperini
|
3 |
♠AJT4
♥963
♦Q6
♣Q742
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
♠K7632
♥T74
♦K7
♣K53
|
♠Q98
♥AQ852
♦AT
♣AJ6
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ ♣3 ♥2 ♠3 NT3 |
EW: 3♣ 5♥ 4♠ 4NT ♦6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
400 4.00 0.00 3N E -4 ♦5 9-Olson-Olson vs 2-Lean-Lean
100 3.00 1.00 4♠ E -1 ♦2 7-Waterman-Waterman vs 3-Hedberg-Jentzer
50 2.00 2.00 3♦ S -1 ♥4 10-Greenlee-Poriss vs 8-Williams-Tadken
170 1.00 3.00 3♥ E 4 ♠5 6-Ainbinder-Barish vs 5-Brackett-Gasperini
630 0.00 4.00 3N E 4 ♦9 4-Bujanovich-Thompson vs 1-Gilbreath-Hall
|
4 |
♠K8632
♥KT76
♦65
♣98
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
♠QJT9
♥A3
♦A832
♣AT3
|
♠A4
♥85
♦QJT7
♣J7654
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ ♣1 ♦1 ♠5/6 NT2 |
EW: 5♣ 5♦ 1♠ 2NT ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.50 0.50 2N W -1 ♥7 5-Brackett-Gasperini vs 2-Lean-Lean
100 3.50 0.50 1N W -1 ♠3 10-Greenlee-Poriss vs 9-Olson-Olson
120 2.00 2.00 1N W 2 ♠2 7-Waterman-Waterman vs 6-Ainbinder-Barish
150 1.00 3.00 2N W 3 ♠3 1-Gilbreath-Hall vs 3-Hedberg-Jentzer
180 0.00 4.00 2N W 4 ♠3 8-Williams-Tadken vs 4-Bujanovich-Thompson
|
5 |
♠Q5
♥J5
♦Q86
♣JT8543
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
♠A7432
♥AQ6
♦A93
♣AQ
|
♠JT8
♥T974
♦KJT5
♣K7
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4 ♦1 ♥2 ♠1 NT1 |
EW: 3♣ 6♦ 4♥ 6♠ 6NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.00 1.00 3N W -2 ♣J 1-Gilbreath-Hall vs 3-Hedberg-Jentzer
100 3.00 1.00 3N W -2 ♣J 7-Waterman-Waterman vs 6-Ainbinder-Barish
100 3.00 1.00 3N W -2 ♣5 5-Brackett-Gasperini vs 2-Lean-Lean
450 0.50 3.50 4♠ W 5 ♥J 8-Williams-Tadken vs 4-Bujanovich-Thompson
450 0.50 3.50 4♠ W 5 ♣J 10-Greenlee-Poriss vs 9-Olson-Olson
|
6 |
♠-
♥T54
♦KQT986
♣9532
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
♠Q863
♥Q762
♦7
♣JT64
|
♠KJ7
♥A9
♦J432
♣AKQ7
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ ♣4 ♥6 ♠6 NT5 |
EW: 2♣ -/1♠ 2NT ♦5 ♥6 ♠6/7 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 3.50 0.50 2♠ S -1 ♦7 10-Greenlee-Poriss vs 9-Olson-Olson
50 3.50 0.50 2♠ S -1 ♣J 7-Waterman-Waterman vs 6-Ainbinder-Barish
100 2.00 2.00 2♠ S -2 ♦7 5-Brackett-Gasperini vs 2-Lean-Lean
500 1.00 3.00 4♠* S -3 ♦7 1-Gilbreath-Hall vs 3-Hedberg-Jentzer
630 0.00 4.00 3N E 4 ♠A 8-Williams-Tadken vs 4-Bujanovich-Thompson
|
7 |
♠A
♥J965
♦AK965
♣T32
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
♠QT9
♥73
♦JT2
♣AJ765
|
♠6532
♥KQT42
♦Q73
♣8
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 3♦ 2♥ 2♠ 2NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦3 ♥5 ♠4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
600 3.50 0.50 3N S 3 ♣7 2-Lean-Lean vs 4-Bujanovich-Thompson
600 3.50 0.50 3N S 3 ♣6 10-Greenlee-Poriss vs 1-Gilbreath-Hall
200 1.50 2.50 3N S -2 ♣5 8-Williams-Tadken vs 7-Waterman-Waterman
200 1.50 2.50 3N N -2 ♥T 9-Olson-Olson vs 5-Brackett-Gasperini
400 0.00 4.00 4♠ S -4 ♦J 6-Ainbinder-Barish vs 3-Hedberg-Jentzer
|
8 |
♠Q8753
♥KJ743
♦42
♣9
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
♠J4
♥AT2
♦763
♣AQT43
|
♠AK6
♥86
♦AKQJ5
♣J65
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣0 ♦0 ♥5 ♠5 NT0 |
EW: 7♣ 7♦ 2♥ 2♠ 5/6NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
400 4.00 0.00 3N E 3 ♥5 10-Greenlee-Poriss vs 1-Gilbreath-Hall
460 3.00 1.00 3N W 5 ♥4 8-Williams-Tadken vs 7-Waterman-Waterman
490 1.50 2.50 3N E 6 ♦T 2-Lean-Lean vs 4-Bujanovich-Thompson
490 1.50 2.50 3N E 6 ♣2 9-Olson-Olson vs 5-Brackett-Gasperini
1020 0.00 4.00 6N W 7 ♠3 6-Ainbinder-Barish vs 3-Hedberg-Jentzer
|
9 |
♠K863
♥Q94
♦J32
♣A64
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
♠754
♥AK2
♦865
♣KJT2
|
♠QJT
♥J85
♦AKQ97
♣93
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦3 ♥5 ♠5 NT4 |
EW: 2♣ 4♦ 2♥ 2♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.00 0.00 3N W -1 ♠3 6-Ainbinder-Barish vs 3-Hedberg-Jentzer
120 3.00 1.00 1N W 2 ♠3 2-Lean-Lean vs 4-Bujanovich-Thompson
130 2.00 2.00 3♦ E 4 ♥T 9-Olson-Olson vs 5-Brackett-Gasperini
150 1.00 3.00 1N W 3 ♠3 10-Greenlee-Poriss vs 1-Gilbreath-Hall
630 0.00 4.00 3N W 4 ♥4 8-Williams-Tadken vs 7-Waterman-Waterman
|
10 |
♠QJ7
♥AT754
♦K52
♣K5
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
♠86
♥62
♦J9874
♣AJ43
|
♠K94
♥KQJ98
♦AT63
♣2
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 4♠ 2/1NT ♦4 ♥6 |
EW: 3♦ ♣3 ♥6 ♠3 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
620 4.00 0.00 4♠ S 4 ♥6 10-Greenlee-Poriss vs 2-Lean-Lean
200 3.00 1.00 2♥ E -2 ♦Q 9-Olson-Olson vs 8-Williams-Tadken
170 2.00 2.00 2♠ N 4 ♣2 7-Waterman-Waterman vs 4-Bujanovich-Thompson
140 1.00 3.00 3♠ N 3 ♥J 3-Hedberg-Jentzer vs 5-Brackett-Gasperini
300 0.00 4.00 3N N -3 ♥K 1-Gilbreath-Hall vs 6-Ainbinder-Barish
|
11 |
♠KJ9
♥AQ7
♦J753
♣T95
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
♠64
♥T32
♦AT864
♣J73
|
♠A75
♥KJ865
♦K92
♣A6
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 3♠ ♦4/3 ♥4 NT6/4 |
EW: 3♦ 3♥ ♣4 ♠4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 3.50 0.50 3♠ S 4 ♦A 10-Greenlee-Poriss vs 2-Lean-Lean
170 3.50 0.50 2♠ N 4 ♣A 7-Waterman-Waterman vs 4-Bujanovich-Thompson
140 2.00 2.00 2♠ N 3 ♣A 3-Hedberg-Jentzer vs 5-Brackett-Gasperini
80 1.00 3.00 1♠ S 1 ♥T 9-Olson-Olson vs 8-Williams-Tadken
140 0.00 4.00 3♥ E 3 ♦Q 1-Gilbreath-Hall vs 6-Ainbinder-Barish
|
12 |
♠K5
♥K54
♦AQ96
♣9843
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
♠QJT87
♥98
♦J74
♣AQ5
|
♠32
♥AQT6
♦T853
♣KJ7
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♥ ♦5 ♠5 NT5 |
EW: 1♦ 1♠ 1NT ♣6 ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
120 3.50 0.50 1N N 2 ♦T 3-Hedberg-Jentzer vs 5-Brackett-Gasperini
120 3.50 0.50 1N N 2 ♦3 9-Olson-Olson vs 8-Williams-Tadken
90 1.50 2.50 1N N 1 ♠3 7-Waterman-Waterman vs 4-Bujanovich-Thompson
90 1.50 2.50 1N N 1 ♥6 1-Gilbreath-Hall vs 6-Ainbinder-Barish
200 0.00 4.00 1N S -2 ♠Q 10-Greenlee-Poriss vs 2-Lean-Lean
|
13 |
♠74
♥A97
♦984
♣AQ954
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
♠AQJ852
♥J86
♦AJ
♣J7
|
♠KT93
♥K532
♦Q3
♣KT3
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♦ ♥3 ♠2 NT3 |
EW: 3♥ 4♠ 4NT ♣6 ♦6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 4.00 0.00 2♠ W 4 ♦9 1-Gilbreath-Hall vs 9-Olson-Olson
620 2.00 2.00 4♠ W 4 ♥A 4-Bujanovich-Thompson vs 6-Ainbinder-Barish
620 2.00 2.00 4♠ W 4 ♥9 8-Williams-Tadken vs 5-Brackett-Gasperini
620 2.00 2.00 4♠ W 4 ♦9 10-Greenlee-Poriss vs 3-Hedberg-Jentzer
650 0.00 4.00 4♠ W 5 ♦9 2-Lean-Lean vs 7-Waterman-Waterman
|
14 |
♠KJ73
♥A2
♦42
♣J8653
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
♠62
♥JT87653
♦J7
♣AK
|
♠T5
♥KQ94
♦AT653
♣Q9
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 4♠ ♦6 ♥4 NT6 |
EW: 1♦ 3♥ ♣3 ♠3 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 3.50 0.50 4♠ S 4 ♣A 1-Gilbreath-Hall vs 9-Olson-Olson
420 3.50 0.50 4♠ S 4 ♣K 10-Greenlee-Poriss vs 3-Hedberg-Jentzer
170 1.50 2.50 3♠ S 4 ♣A 4-Bujanovich-Thompson vs 6-Ainbinder-Barish
170 1.50 2.50 2♠ S 4 ♣A 8-Williams-Tadken vs 5-Brackett-Gasperini
420 0.00 4.00 4♥ W 4 ♠3 2-Lean-Lean vs 7-Waterman-Waterman
|
15 |
♠432
♥A9865
♦953
♣83
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
♠T8
♥QT732
♦J82
♣K52
|
♠AQ9
♥KJ
♦KT6
♣AT764
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 2♠ ♣4 ♥5 NT5 |
EW: 3/2♣ 2/1♥ 2/1NT ♦6 ♠5/4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 4.00 0.00 3♠ S 4 ♣2 10-Greenlee-Poriss vs 3-Hedberg-Jentzer
50 3.00 1.00 2♥ E -1 ♣Q 1-Gilbreath-Hall vs 9-Olson-Olson
110 2.00 2.00 2♥ W 2 ♥4 2-Lean-Lean vs 7-Waterman-Waterman
120 1.00 3.00 1N E 2 ♠J 8-Williams-Tadken vs 5-Brackett-Gasperini
200 0.00 4.00 3♠ S -2 ♣K 4-Bujanovich-Thompson vs 6-Ainbinder-Barish
|
16 |
♠T95
♥T962
♦8
♣AQT95
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
♠K632
♥AK84
♦QT63
♣6
|
♠AJ8
♥3
♦KJ75
♣KJ432
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦2 ♥5 ♠4 NT4 |
EW: 2♣ 4♦ 2♥ 3♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 3.50 0.50 3N W -2 ♥9 2-Lean-Lean vs 1-Gilbreath-Hall
200 3.50 0.50 5♦ W -2 ♥T 3-Hedberg-Jentzer vs 8-Williams-Tadken
100 2.00 2.00 3N W -1 ♥2 10-Greenlee-Poriss vs 4-Bujanovich-Thompson
600 1.00 3.00 3N E 3 ♠4 9-Olson-Olson vs 6-Ainbinder-Barish
630 0.00 4.00 3N E 4 ♥Q 5-Brackett-Gasperini vs 7-Waterman-Waterman
|
17 |
♠AQ4
♥Q65
♦Q94
♣QT43
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
♠972
♥AKJ42
♦763
♣J8
|
♠KJ8
♥T3
♦KT85
♣AK75
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6/5 ♦4 ♥4 ♠5 NT6/5 |
EW: 1/2♣ 3♦ 3♥ 2♠ 1/2NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.00 0.00 3N E -2 ♣4 2-Lean-Lean vs 1-Gilbreath-Hall
100 3.00 1.00 1N N -2 ♦5 9-Olson-Olson vs 6-Ainbinder-Barish
110 2.00 2.00 1♥ W 2 ♣3 3-Hedberg-Jentzer vs 8-Williams-Tadken
120 1.00 3.00 1N E 2 ♠3 10-Greenlee-Poriss vs 4-Bujanovich-Thompson
400 0.00 4.00 3N E 3 ♠T 5-Brackett-Gasperini vs 7-Waterman-Waterman
|
18 |
♠Q854
♥J76
♦AT72
♣A8
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
♠T6
♥AQ8
♦J643
♣J942
|
♠97
♥543
♦KQ985
♣753
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 1♦ 5♥ 5♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦6 ♥2 ♠2 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
710 4.00 0.00 4♠ S 7 ♥8 2-Lean-Lean vs 1-Gilbreath-Hall
680 2.00 2.00 5♠ S 6 ♥8 9-Olson-Olson vs 6-Ainbinder-Barish
680 2.00 2.00 4♠ S 6 ♥8 3-Hedberg-Jentzer vs 8-Williams-Tadken
680 2.00 2.00 4♠ S 6 ♣2 10-Greenlee-Poriss vs 4-Bujanovich-Thompson
650 0.00 4.00 4♠ N 5 ♦3 5-Brackett-Gasperini vs 7-Waterman-Waterman
|
19 |
♠K9
♥T87
♦QJ6532
♣J5
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
♠A52
♥Q9632
♦A4
♣AT6
|
♠JT86
♥K4
♦T9
♣K8742
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ -/1NT ♣3 ♥5 ♠5 NT6/7 |
EW: 3♣ 2♥ 2♠ ♦5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
90 3.50 0.50 1N S 1 ♥3 4-Bujanovich-Thompson vs 9-Olson-Olson
90 3.50 0.50 2♦ N 2 ♥4 10-Greenlee-Poriss vs 5-Brackett-Gasperini
50 1.00 3.00 2N S -1 ♥2 3-Hedberg-Jentzer vs 2-Lean-Lean
50 1.00 3.00 3♦ S -1 ♠5 6-Ainbinder-Barish vs 8-Williams-Tadken
50 1.00 3.00 2♦ N -1 ♥K 1-Gilbreath-Hall vs 7-Waterman-Waterman
|
20 |
♠KT95
♥842
♦K3
♣7532
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
♠732
♥JT3
♦QJ954
♣AT
|
♠QJ
♥AKQ96
♦87
♣KJ96
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♠ ♣4 ♦5 ♥4 NT4 |
EW: 2♣ 2♦ 3♥ 1NT ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 4.00 0.00 2♥ E 2 ♣4 10-Greenlee-Poriss vs 5-Brackett-Gasperini
140 2.00 2.00 3♥ E 3 ♠A 3-Hedberg-Jentzer vs 2-Lean-Lean
140 2.00 2.00 2♥ E 3 ♦A 6-Ainbinder-Barish vs 8-Williams-Tadken
140 2.00 2.00 2♥ E 3 ♣4 1-Gilbreath-Hall vs 7-Waterman-Waterman
170 0.00 4.00 2♥ E 4 ♦6 4-Bujanovich-Thompson vs 9-Olson-Olson
|
21 |
♠K2
♥9853
♦AQ6
♣A632
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
♠JT865
♥K764
♦T2
♣85
|
♠AQ74
♥J
♦J754
♣KQT4
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♦ 2♥ 1/-NT ♠4 NT7/6 |
EW: 3♠ ♣6 ♦6 ♥5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 4.00 0.00 2♥ S 3 ♦T 10-Greenlee-Poriss vs 5-Brackett-Gasperini
110 3.00 1.00 2♥ S 2 ♦T 4-Bujanovich-Thompson vs 9-Olson-Olson
80 2.00 2.00 1♥ S 1 ♠J 6-Ainbinder-Barish vs 8-Williams-Tadken
50 1.00 3.00 3♠ W -1 ♥9 3-Hedberg-Jentzer vs 2-Lean-Lean
200 0.00 4.00 4♥ S -2 ♠J 1-Gilbreath-Hall vs 7-Waterman-Waterman
|
22 |
♠8
♥QJT97
♦7632
♣J95
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
♠T94
♥A83
♦AQJT
♣AQ6
|
♠AQ73
♥2
♦K9854
♣T84
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ ♣5 ♦3 ♠5 NT4 |
EW: 2♣ 4♦ 2♠ 3NT ♥5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.00 0.00 3N W -1 ♥Q 7-Waterman-Waterman vs 9-Olson-Olson
130 3.00 1.00 2♦ E 4 ♠5 5-Brackett-Gasperini vs 1-Gilbreath-Hall
170 2.00 2.00 2♦ E 6 ♠2 10-Greenlee-Poriss vs 6-Ainbinder-Barish
600 0.50 3.50 3N W 3 ♥Q 4-Bujanovich-Thompson vs 3-Hedberg-Jentzer
600 0.50 3.50 5♦ W 5 ♠8 2-Lean-Lean vs 8-Williams-Tadken
|
23 |
♠J93
♥A652
♦A87
♣A53
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
♠AT82
♥KQJ
♦QT
♣T972
|
♠KQ
♥93
♦KJ432
♣KJ84
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4 ♦3 ♥5 ♠4 NT3 |
EW: 3♣ 3♦ 2/1♥ 3♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
120 4.00 0.00 2N W 2 ♥2 10-Greenlee-Poriss vs 6-Ainbinder-Barish
140 3.00 1.00 1♠ W 3 ♠3 4-Bujanovich-Thompson vs 3-Hedberg-Jentzer
150 2.00 2.00 1N E 3 ♥8 7-Waterman-Waterman vs 9-Olson-Olson
630 0.50 3.50 3N W 4 ♠3 2-Lean-Lean vs 8-Williams-Tadken
630 0.50 3.50 3N W 4 ♥2 5-Brackett-Gasperini vs 1-Gilbreath-Hall
|
24 |
♠K74
♥J63
♦KT852
♣QT
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
♠T93
♥T84
♦AQ763
♣93
|
♠J852
♥75
♦94
♣J8752
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 5♦ 6♥ 5♠ 6NT |
EW: ♣3 ♦2 ♥1 ♠2 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
980 3.00 1.00 6♥ S 6 ♠T 4-Bujanovich-Thompson vs 3-Hedberg-Jentzer
980 3.00 1.00 6♥ S 6 ♥8 7-Waterman-Waterman vs 9-Olson-Olson
980 3.00 1.00 6♥ S 6 ♦A 5-Brackett-Gasperini vs 1-Gilbreath-Hall
480 1.00 3.00 4♥ S 6 ♦A 10-Greenlee-Poriss vs 6-Ainbinder-Barish
50 0.00 4.00 6♥ S -1 ♣9 2-Lean-Lean vs 8-Williams-Tadken
|
25 |
♠543
♥J95
♦A763
♣963
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
♠AJ2
♥K8
♦QT9
♣AKQJ5
|
♠KT87
♥T642
♦J4
♣T74
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦6 ♥5 ♠3 NT3 |
EW: 4♣ 1♦ 2♥ 4♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.00 0.00 3N W -1 ♦3 3-Hedberg-Jentzer vs 9-Olson-Olson
120 3.00 1.00 2N W 2 ♦3 8-Williams-Tadken vs 1-Gilbreath-Hall
180 2.00 2.00 2N W 4 ♦6 5-Brackett-Gasperini vs 4-Bujanovich-Thompson
660 0.50 3.50 3N W 5 ♦7 6-Ainbinder-Barish vs 2-Lean-Lean
660 0.50 3.50 3N W 5 ♦3 10-Greenlee-Poriss vs 7-Waterman-Waterman
|
26 |
♠A862
♥Q82
♦432
♣T83
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
♠KQ5
♥AK3
♦QJ97
♣AQ6
|
♠973
♥JT765
♦865
♣KJ
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6 ♦4 ♥4 ♠5 NT4 |
EW: 1♣ 3♦ 3♥ 1/2♠ 2NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.00 0.00 4♥ W -1 ♠A 6-Ainbinder-Barish vs 2-Lean-Lean
90 3.00 1.00 1N W 1 ♥8 5-Brackett-Gasperini vs 4-Bujanovich-Thompson
140 2.00 2.00 3♥ E 3 ♣8 3-Hedberg-Jentzer vs 9-Olson-Olson
600 1.00 3.00 3N W 3 ♠2 8-Williams-Tadken vs 1-Gilbreath-Hall
630 0.00 4.00 3N W 4 ♦2 10-Greenlee-Poriss vs 7-Waterman-Waterman
|
27 |
♠AQT2
♥876
♦A2
♣KJ94
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
♠864
♥KQ43
♦Q94
♣T86
|
♠KJ9
♥T9
♦KJT85
♣Q75
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 2♥ 2♠ 1NT ♦6 |
EW: 1♦ ♣5 ♥5 ♠5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.00 0.00 2♦* E -1 ♠7 6-Ainbinder-Barish vs 2-Lean-Lean
50 3.00 1.00 3♦ E -1 ♣A 3-Hedberg-Jentzer vs 9-Olson-Olson
50 2.00 2.00 2♥ S -1 ♦4 10-Greenlee-Poriss vs 7-Waterman-Waterman
90 1.00 3.00 1N W 1 ♥7 5-Brackett-Gasperini vs 4-Bujanovich-Thompson
100 0.00 4.00 2♠ N -2 ♦8 8-Williams-Tadken vs 1-Gilbreath-Hall
|