1 |
♠K8643
♥75
♦K9
♣Q943
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
♠72
♥AQT84
♦J43
♣652
|
♠AJT9
♥J32
♦Q82
♣AK7
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦6 ♥3 ♠6 NT4 |
EW: 1♣ 1♦ 3♥ 1♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
90 4.00 0.00 2♦ S 2 ♥5 9-Greenlee-Berry vs 7-Williams-Tadken
110 2.50 1.50 2♥ W 2 ♦K 3-Besteman-Davis vs 11-Moss-McNaught
110 2.50 1.50 2♥ E 2 ♦A 6-Lean-Lean vs 10-Waterman-Waterman
140 1.00 3.00 2♥ E 3 ♣J 12-Jentzer-Feller vs 1-Kittock-Willcoxon
150 0.00 4.00 1N E 3 ♠Q 5-Hedberg-Geritz vs 2-Moss-McNaught
|
2 |
♠AJ763
♥64
♦AT98
♣J4
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
♠QT95
♥JT3
♦Q6
♣KT92
|
♠K8
♥AKQ97
♦K7543
♣6
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ ♦5 ♥3/4 ♠6 NT5/4 |
EW: 2♦ 3♥ 1♠ 2NT ♣6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.00 0.00 3♦ E -2 ♠4 5-Hedberg-Geritz vs 2-Moss-McNaught
50 2.50 1.50 4♥ E -1 ♠4 12-Jentzer-Feller vs 1-Kittock-Willcoxon
50 2.50 1.50 3♥ E -1 ♠4 9-Greenlee-Berry vs 7-Williams-Tadken
140 1.00 3.00 2♥ E 3 ♣A 3-Besteman-Davis vs 11-Moss-McNaught
420 0.00 4.00 4♥ E 4 ♠4 6-Lean-Lean vs 10-Waterman-Waterman
|
3 |
♠-
♥K752
♦J653
♣Q9853
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
♠T862
♥A64
♦2
♣AKJ64
|
♠J97543
♥T83
♦Q4
♣72
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 5♦ 4♥ 4NT ♠6 |
EW: 1♠ ♣5 ♦2 ♥3 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
1100 4.00 0.00 4♠* E -4 ♦A 6-Lean-Lean vs 10-Waterman-Waterman
800 3.00 1.00 4♠* E -3 ♦A 5-Hedberg-Geritz vs 2-Moss-McNaught
430 2.00 2.00 3N S 4 ♣A 9-Greenlee-Berry vs 7-Williams-Tadken
420 1.00 3.00 5♦ S 6 ♣A 12-Jentzer-Feller vs 1-Kittock-Willcoxon
200 0.00 4.00 3♠ E -2 ♦A 3-Besteman-Davis vs 11-Moss-McNaught
|
4 |
♠KQ4
♥64
♦J87
♣AKQ85
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
♠JT632
♥AK732
♦2
♣T3
|
♠A5
♥95
♦AT654
♣7642
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 2♦ 3NT ♥5 ♠6 |
EW: 1♥ 1♠ ♣4 ♦5 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
500 4.00 0.00 2♦* E -2 ♦K 12-Jentzer-Feller vs 2-Moss-McNaught
150 3.00 1.00 1N N 3 ♦5 11-Moss-McNaught vs 4-Bujanovich-Staab
100 2.00 2.00 2♥ W -1 ♣A 9-Greenlee-Berry vs 5-Hedberg-Geritz
90 0.50 3.50 2♣ N 2 ♠A 7-Williams-Tadken vs 10-Waterman-Waterman
90 0.50 3.50 2♣ N 2 ♥9 6-Lean-Lean vs 3-Besteman-Davis
|
5 |
♠AQJ43
♥53
♦KT5
♣653
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
♠75
♥KJ96
♦Q632
♣874
|
♠T92
♥Q4
♦AJ9874
♣AK
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 1♥ 3♠ 1/-NT ♦3 NT7/6 |
EW: 4♦ ♣4 ♥5 ♠3 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 4.00 0.00 3♠ N 3 ♣A 6-Lean-Lean vs 3-Besteman-Davis
100 3.00 1.00 4♦ E -2 ♣Q 12-Jentzer-Feller vs 2-Moss-McNaught
130 1.50 2.50 4♦ E 4 ♠A 7-Williams-Tadken vs 10-Waterman-Waterman
130 1.50 2.50 3♦ E 4 ♠K 9-Greenlee-Berry vs 5-Hedberg-Geritz
200 0.00 4.00 3♠ N -2 ♣A 11-Moss-McNaught vs 4-Bujanovich-Staab
|
6 |
♠985
♥A72
♦K976
♣J92
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
♠J2
♥Q86
♦A843
♣K765
|
♠AK763
♥K943
♦J5
♣A3
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦4 ♥3 ♠4 NT5 |
EW: 1♣ 2♦ 4♥ 3♠ 2NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
300 4.00 0.00 3N E -3 ♣4 12-Jentzer-Feller vs 2-Moss-McNaught
100 3.00 1.00 3N W -1 ♠T 6-Lean-Lean vs 3-Besteman-Davis
110 2.00 2.00 2♠ E 2 ♦2 11-Moss-McNaught vs 4-Bujanovich-Staab
140 0.50 3.50 2♠ W 3 ♣8 9-Greenlee-Berry vs 5-Hedberg-Geritz
140 0.50 3.50 2♠ E 3 ♣4 7-Williams-Tadken vs 10-Waterman-Waterman
|
7 |
♠83
♥K52
♦AJ85
♣AJ63
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
♠J742
♥QT973
♦Q3
♣T7
|
♠KQT96
♥J
♦KT9764
♣4
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 3♥ 4NT ♦5 ♠5 |
EW: 1♦ 2♠ ♣2 ♥4 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
630 4.00 0.00 3N N 4 ♠9 12-Jentzer-Feller vs 3-Besteman-Davis
600 3.00 1.00 5♣ S 5 ♦Q 11-Moss-McNaught vs 5-Hedberg-Geritz
500 2.00 2.00 4♦* E -2 ♠A 1-Kittock-Willcoxon vs 6-Lean-Lean
150 1.00 3.00 4♣ S 5 ♠J 7-Williams-Tadken vs 4-Bujanovich-Staab
130 0.00 4.00 3♣ S 4 ♠2 2-Moss-McNaught vs 9-Greenlee-Berry
|
8 |
♠A97
♥K82
♦854
♣KJT9
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
♠QJT2
♥AJ974
♦A2
♣43
|
♠63
♥53
♦KQT97
♣Q762
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ -/1♠ 1NT ♦6 ♥5 ♠6/7 |
EW: 1♦ 1♥ ♣6 ♠6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.00 0.00 3♥ W -2 ♦4 7-Williams-Tadken vs 4-Bujanovich-Staab
50 3.00 1.00 2♣ N -1 ♥5 1-Kittock-Willcoxon vs 6-Lean-Lean
100 2.00 2.00 2N N -2 ♥5 12-Jentzer-Feller vs 3-Besteman-Davis
140 1.00 3.00 2♥ W 3 ♥2 11-Moss-McNaught vs 5-Hedberg-Geritz
150 0.00 4.00 1N E 3 ♠4 2-Moss-McNaught vs 9-Greenlee-Berry
|
9 |
♠AQ73
♥T
♦KJ976
♣AQ3
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
♠K
♥Q954
♦A854
♣J852
|
♠JT6542
♥86
♦T32
♣T4
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 5♦ 5♥ 3♠ 5NT |
EW: ♣2 ♦2 ♥2 ♠4 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
460 4.00 0.00 3N N 5 ♠5 1-Kittock-Willcoxon vs 6-Lean-Lean
450 2.50 1.50 4♥ S 5 ♠K 12-Jentzer-Feller vs 3-Besteman-Davis
450 2.50 1.50 4♥ S 5 ♦A 7-Williams-Tadken vs 4-Bujanovich-Staab
430 1.00 3.00 3N N 4 ♠5 11-Moss-McNaught vs 5-Hedberg-Geritz
100 0.00 4.00 6N S -2 ♦A 2-Moss-McNaught vs 9-Greenlee-Berry
|
10 |
♠A954
♥AK62
♦T4
♣JT7
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
♠Q73
♥QJT
♦J9763
♣AK
|
♠-
♥84
♦AKQ85
♣965432
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ 3♠ ♣3 ♦0 NT6 |
EW: 4♣ 5♦ ♥4 ♠4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 4.00 0.00 3♠ N 3 ♣A 3-Besteman-Davis vs 1-Kittock-Willcoxon
100 3.00 1.00 3N N -1 ♣J 11-Moss-McNaught vs 6-Lean-Lean
130 2.00 2.00 4♦ E 4 ♠8 2-Moss-McNaught vs 7-Williams-Tadken
500 1.00 3.00 5♠* S -2 ♣A 10-Waterman-Waterman vs 9-Greenlee-Berry
640 0.00 4.00 5♦ E 7 ♠8 12-Jentzer-Feller vs 4-Bujanovich-Staab
|
11 |
♠943
♥KJ7
♦AT3
♣A843
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
♠KT8
♥Q5
♦97654
♣KQ6
|
♠QJ7
♥843
♦KQ82
♣T52
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 3♥ 3♠ 2NT ♦6 |
EW: 1♦ ♣4 ♥4 ♠4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 3.50 0.50 3♥ S 3 ♠2 3-Besteman-Davis vs 1-Kittock-Willcoxon
140 3.50 0.50 1♥ S 3 ♣K 12-Jentzer-Feller vs 4-Bujanovich-Staab
110 1.50 2.50 2♥ S 2 ♣K 10-Waterman-Waterman vs 9-Greenlee-Berry
110 1.50 2.50 1♥ S 2 ♦7 2-Moss-McNaught vs 7-Williams-Tadken
PASS 0.00 4.00 Pass Out 11-Moss-McNaught vs 6-Lean-Lean
|
12 |
♠3
♥Q965
♦AT8754
♣T7
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
♠K9642
♥K3
♦Q3
♣6542
|
♠AQJ875
♥AJT82
♦-
♣K3
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 4♦ ♥3 ♠2 NT4 |
EW: 4♥ 5♠ ♣4/2 ♦2 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 4.00 0.00 6♠ E -1 ♦4 10-Waterman-Waterman vs 9-Greenlee-Berry
450 2.50 1.50 5♠ E 5 ♦K 11-Moss-McNaught vs 6-Lean-Lean
450 2.50 1.50 5♠ E 5 ♦6 12-Jentzer-Feller vs 4-Bujanovich-Staab
480 0.50 3.50 4♠ E 6 ♥7 3-Besteman-Davis vs 1-Kittock-Willcoxon
480 0.50 3.50 4♠ E 6 ♣Q 2-Moss-McNaught vs 7-Williams-Tadken
|
13 |
♠KQ75
♥7
♦J4
♣QJT975
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
♠J6
♥AK654
♦Q
♣AK864
|
♠AT94
♥QJ983
♦K762
♣-
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦6 ♥1 ♠3 NT3 |
EW: 1♣ 5♥ 4♠ 4NT ♦6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
630 4.00 0.00 4N W 4 ♣2 7-Williams-Tadken vs 11-Moss-McNaught
650 2.50 1.50 4♥ W 5 ♠K 1-Kittock-Willcoxon vs 10-Waterman-Waterman
650 2.50 1.50 4♥ W 5 ♣Q 4-Bujanovich-Staab vs 2-Moss-McNaught
710 1.00 3.00 4♥ W 7 ♣Q 9-Greenlee-Berry vs 6-Lean-Lean
1430 0.00 4.00 6♥ E 6 ♦A 12-Jentzer-Feller vs 5-Hedberg-Geritz
|
14 |
♠KJ7643
♥AQ
♦86
♣T86
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
♠QT2
♥987
♦Q9532
♣97
|
♠98
♥T642
♦4
♣AQJ542
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 5♦ 6♥ 6♠ 6NT |
EW: ♣5 ♦2 ♥1 ♠1 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
480 2.50 1.50 4♠ N 6 ♦4 1-Kittock-Willcoxon vs 10-Waterman-Waterman
480 2.50 1.50 4♠ N 6 ♦4 9-Greenlee-Berry vs 6-Lean-Lean
480 2.50 1.50 4♠ N 6 ♦4 12-Jentzer-Feller vs 5-Hedberg-Geritz
480 2.50 1.50 4♠ N 6 ♣A 4-Bujanovich-Staab vs 2-Moss-McNaught
110 0.00 4.00 3♦ S 3 ♥9 7-Williams-Tadken vs 11-Moss-McNaught
|
15 |
♠AJ743
♥542
♦T863
♣9
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
♠Q
♥AT86
♦J9754
♣QT2
|
♠K52
♥K73
♦KQ2
♣K754
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♠ ♣6 ♦4 ♥5 NT6 |
EW: 1♣ 2♦ 1NT ♥6 ♠4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 4.00 0.00 2♠ N 4 ♦K 1-Kittock-Willcoxon vs 10-Waterman-Waterman
150 3.00 1.00 3♥ W -3 ♣9 9-Greenlee-Berry vs 6-Lean-Lean
50 2.00 2.00 3♥ W -1 ♣9 7-Williams-Tadken vs 11-Moss-McNaught
90 1.00 3.00 2♦ W 2 ♣9 4-Bujanovich-Staab vs 2-Moss-McNaught
100 0.00 4.00 4♠ N -1 ♦K 12-Jentzer-Feller vs 5-Hedberg-Geritz
|
16 |
♠987
♥763
♦QT9
♣J872
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
♠T543
♥84
♦J8765
♣KQ
|
♠KQ2
♥AKT2
♦32
♣9543
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 2♥ 3NT ♦6 ♠6 |
EW: ♣4 ♦6 ♥5/4 ♠6 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 4.00 0.00 1N E -2 ♥5 1-Kittock-Willcoxon vs 7-Williams-Tadken
150 3.00 1.00 1N N 3 ♦2 2-Moss-McNaught vs 10-Waterman-Waterman
100 2.00 2.00 2♠ W -1 ♥7 5-Hedberg-Geritz vs 3-Besteman-Davis
70 1.00 3.00 1♦ N 1 ♥A 4-Bujanovich-Staab vs 9-Greenlee-Berry
100 0.00 4.00 2♠ N -2 ♦3 12-Jentzer-Feller vs 6-Lean-Lean
|
17 |
♠83
♥Q92
♦AQ73
♣K652
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
♠A76
♥AT84
♦986
♣T74
|
♠KQJT
♥K65
♦J54
♣A83
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 2♦ ♥5 ♠5 NT5 |
EW: 1♥ 1♠ 1NT ♣5 ♦5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 4.00 0.00 1N N -1 ♠T 1-Kittock-Willcoxon vs 7-Williams-Tadken
80 2.50 1.50 1♠ E 1 ♠2 5-Hedberg-Geritz vs 3-Besteman-Davis
80 2.50 1.50 1♠ E 1 ♥3 4-Bujanovich-Staab vs 9-Greenlee-Berry
90 1.00 3.00 1N W 1 ♦3 12-Jentzer-Feller vs 6-Lean-Lean
120 0.00 4.00 1N W 2 ♣J 2-Moss-McNaught vs 10-Waterman-Waterman
|
18 |
♠J95
♥AQ3
♦53
♣KJT96
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
♠K84
♥KJT6
♦84
♣A832
|
♠732
♥852
♦AKT9
♣Q74
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 2♦ 2♠ 1NT ♥6 |
EW: ♣6 ♦5 ♥6 ♠4/5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 4.00 0.00 1♠ S 3 ♥6 12-Jentzer-Feller vs 6-Lean-Lean
PASS 2.50 1.50 Pass Out 4-Bujanovich-Staab vs 9-Greenlee-Berry
PASS 2.50 1.50 Pass Out 5-Hedberg-Geritz vs 3-Besteman-Davis
100 1.00 3.00 2♣ N -1 ♦9 1-Kittock-Willcoxon vs 7-Williams-Tadken
120 0.00 4.00 1N E 2 ♦Q 2-Moss-McNaught vs 10-Waterman-Waterman
|
19 |
♠J
♥J53
♦J8765
♣AQT3
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
♠T72
♥AQT72
♦T
♣J964
|
♠Q965
♥K8
♦KQ43
♣K52
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ ♣6 ♥5 ♠6 NT5 |
EW: 1♣ 1♥ 1♠ 1/-NT ♦5 NT7/6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.00 1.00 2♥ W -1 ♠J 5-Hedberg-Geritz vs 1-Kittock-Willcoxon
100 3.00 1.00 2♥ W -1 ♠J 10-Waterman-Waterman vs 3-Besteman-Davis
100 3.00 1.00 2♥ E -1 ♠J 11-Moss-McNaught vs 9-Greenlee-Berry
90 1.00 3.00 2♦ S 2 ♣4 12-Jentzer-Feller vs 7-Williams-Tadken
120 0.00 4.00 2N E 2 ♠A 6-Lean-Lean vs 4-Bujanovich-Staab
|
20 |
♠A965
♥A85
♦632
♣752
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
♠J2
♥QJ7
♦AJT7
♣AJ43
|
♠KQT874
♥K42
♦Q5
♣K6
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦3 ♥3 ♠2 NT2 |
EW: 3♣ 4♦ 3♥ 5♠ 5NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
620 4.00 0.00 4♠ E 4 ♥T 12-Jentzer-Feller vs 7-Williams-Tadken
650 2.00 2.00 4♠ E 5 ♥6 10-Waterman-Waterman vs 3-Besteman-Davis
650 2.00 2.00 4♠ E 5 ♦4 6-Lean-Lean vs 4-Bujanovich-Staab
650 2.00 2.00 4♠ E 5 ♣T 11-Moss-McNaught vs 9-Greenlee-Berry
660 0.00 4.00 3N W 5 ♠5 5-Hedberg-Geritz vs 1-Kittock-Willcoxon
|
21 |
♠A7
♥T9865
♦A9
♣T962
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
♠J9543
♥3
♦Q7643
♣A8
|
♠Q2
♥AQJ74
♦KT852
♣J
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 1♥ 1NT ♦3 ♠5 |
EW: 4♦ 1♠ ♣3 ♥6 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 4.00 0.00 3♣ N 5 ♥A 12-Jentzer-Feller vs 7-Williams-Tadken
130 3.00 1.00 4♣ S 4 ♥3 11-Moss-McNaught vs 9-Greenlee-Berry
100 1.50 2.50 5♣ S -1 ♥4 10-Waterman-Waterman vs 3-Besteman-Davis
100 1.50 2.50 5♣ S -1 ♥3 5-Hedberg-Geritz vs 1-Kittock-Willcoxon
130 0.00 4.00 4♦ E 4 ♣K 6-Lean-Lean vs 4-Bujanovich-Staab
|
22 |
♠QT
♥T
♦AQJT84
♣Q763
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
♠A76
♥KQ2
♦63
♣AJ984
|
♠K983
♥A63
♦K972
♣K2
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦5 ♥5 ♠3 NT3 |
EW: 4♣ 2♦ 2♥ 4♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 4.00 0.00 3N W -2 ♦Q 3-Besteman-Davis vs 9-Greenlee-Berry
600 3.00 1.00 3N E 3 ♥4 6-Lean-Lean vs 2-Moss-McNaught
630 1.50 2.50 3N W 4 ♣3 7-Williams-Tadken vs 5-Hedberg-Geritz
630 1.50 2.50 3N E 4 ♥4 10-Waterman-Waterman vs 4-Bujanovich-Staab
1100 0.00 4.00 4♦* N -5 ♣K 11-Moss-McNaught vs 1-Kittock-Willcoxon
|
23 |
♠-
♥QJ98
♦K985
♣KQ642
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
♠K7642
♥7642
♦J2
♣J5
|
♠AQ985
♥AK3
♦A43
♣93
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 4♦ ♥5 ♠4 NT5 |
EW: 2♥ 3♠ 2NT ♣3 ♦3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
130 4.00 0.00 3♣ N 4 ♥A 6-Lean-Lean vs 2-Moss-McNaught
100 3.00 1.00 4♠ E -1 ♣T 7-Williams-Tadken vs 5-Hedberg-Geritz
140 1.00 3.00 3♠ W 3 ♥Q 3-Besteman-Davis vs 9-Greenlee-Berry
140 1.00 3.00 3♠ E 3 ♥T 10-Waterman-Waterman vs 4-Bujanovich-Staab
140 1.00 3.00 2♠ E 3 ♥6 11-Moss-McNaught vs 1-Kittock-Willcoxon
|
24 |
♠KT94
♥762
♦K75
♣QT3
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
♠AQ
♥KJ84
♦Q6
♣AK954
|
♠J87632
♥AT3
♦AJ3
♣6
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣2 ♦3 ♥1 ♠2 NT2 |
EW: 4/5♣ 3♦ 6♥ 5♠ 4/5NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.00 0.00 6N W -2 ♥7 11-Moss-McNaught vs 1-Kittock-Willcoxon
50 3.00 1.00 6♠ E -1 ♦9 6-Lean-Lean vs 2-Moss-McNaught
430 2.00 2.00 3N W 4 ♠4 7-Williams-Tadken vs 5-Hedberg-Geritz
450 0.50 3.50 4♠ E 5 ♦T 10-Waterman-Waterman vs 4-Bujanovich-Staab
450 0.50 3.50 4♠ E 5 ♦2 3-Besteman-Davis vs 9-Greenlee-Berry
|
25 |
♠J9872
♥Q9843
♦K
♣Q2
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
♠Q43
♥A6
♦986
♣98643
|
♠AT5
♥J52
♦QJ542
♣KT
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1/-♣ 1♦ 4♥ 3♠ 3NT ♣7/6 |
EW: ♣5 ♦6/5 ♥3/2 ♠3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 3.50 0.50 3♥ N 4 ♦Q 12-Jentzer-Feller vs 9-Greenlee-Berry
170 3.50 0.50 2♥ S 4 ♥A 4-Bujanovich-Staab vs 1-Kittock-Willcoxon
140 1.50 2.50 3♥ N 3 ♥2 5-Hedberg-Geritz vs 10-Waterman-Waterman
140 1.50 2.50 1♥ N 3 ♦2 7-Williams-Tadken vs 3-Besteman-Davis
50 0.00 4.00 2N S -1 ♣4 2-Moss-McNaught vs 11-Moss-McNaught
|
26 |
♠863
♥T43
♦J9
♣A7643
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
♠T972
♥A8
♦K842
♣KQJ
|
♠AKJ4
♥Q9652
♦Q5
♣85
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6 ♦5 ♥4 ♠3 NT5 |
EW: 1♣ 2♦ 3♥ 4♠ 2NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
620 4.00 0.00 4♠ E 4 ♦7 7-Williams-Tadken vs 3-Besteman-Davis
100 3.00 1.00 4♠ W -1 ♦J 5-Hedberg-Geritz vs 10-Waterman-Waterman
600 2.00 2.00 3N W 3 ♣2 2-Moss-McNaught vs 11-Moss-McNaught
620 1.00 3.00 4♠ W 4 ♦J 12-Jentzer-Feller vs 9-Greenlee-Berry
800 0.00 4.00 2♦* S -3 ♥A 4-Bujanovich-Staab vs 1-Kittock-Willcoxon
|
27 |
♠AKJ532
♥JT874
♦-
♣Q8
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
♠9
♥AQ3
♦J942
♣KT743
|
♠4
♥K92
♦AKQ853
♣AJ5
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♠ ♣0 ♦0 ♥4 NT0 |
EW: 4/5♣ 6♦ 3♥ 1NT ♠4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 4.00 0.00 4♦ E 6 ♠8 7-Williams-Tadken vs 3-Besteman-Davis
190 3.00 1.00 4♦ E 7 ♥3 2-Moss-McNaught vs 11-Moss-McNaught
400 2.00 2.00 5♣ W 5 ♠2 12-Jentzer-Feller vs 9-Greenlee-Berry
420 1.00 3.00 5♦ E 6 ♠Q 4-Bujanovich-Staab vs 1-Kittock-Willcoxon
920 0.00 4.00 6♦ E 6 ♠6 5-Hedberg-Geritz vs 10-Waterman-Waterman
|