1 |
♠AK8
♥953
♦A73
♣QJ83
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
♠QT743
♥QJ76
♦Q96
♣A
|
♠J
♥K82
♦KJ854
♣K954
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6 ♦3 ♥4 ♠5 NT4 |
EW: 1♣ 4♦ 2♥ 2♠ 1NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 4.00 0.00 2♦ E 3 ♣3 6-Hall-Mix vs 10-Imdieke-Feller
140 3.00 1.00 2♥ W 3 ♠A 9-Nielsen-Nielsen vs 7-Phillips-Mastic
150 1.50 2.50 1N E 3 ♣2 3-Hedberg-Rasmussen vs 11-Poriss-Greenlee
150 1.50 2.50 2♠ S -3 ♦Q 5-Olson-Olson vs 2-Hannaford-Rhodes
170 0.00 4.00 2♥ W 4 ♠A 8-Williams-Tadken vs 4-Ainbinder-Staab
|
2 |
♠AQJT62
♥K4
♦QJ96
♣9
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
♠983
♥76
♦T4
♣QJ8752
|
♠K5
♥AQJT83
♦AK82
♣3
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4 ♦5/4 ♥3 ♠6 NT5/4 |
EW: 3♣ 3♥ ♦6 ♠6 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 4.00 0.00 3♥ E 3 ♣K 5-Olson-Olson vs 2-Hannaford-Rhodes
170 2.50 1.50 3♥ E 4 ♠7 9-Nielsen-Nielsen vs 7-Phillips-Mastic
170 2.50 1.50 2♥ W 4 ♠4 8-Williams-Tadken vs 4-Ainbinder-Staab
200 1.00 3.00 3♠ N -2 ♥A 6-Hall-Mix vs 10-Imdieke-Feller
420 0.00 4.00 4♥ E 4 ♣A 3-Hedberg-Rasmussen vs 11-Poriss-Greenlee
|
3 |
♠A6
♥Q9843
♦JT94
♣86
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
♠K74
♥K75
♦62
♣KT532
|
♠JT83
♥J6
♦AKQ3
♣QJ4
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ ♣3 ♦6 ♠5 NT4 |
EW: 3♣ 1♦ 2♠ 1NT ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.00 0.00 2♠ E -1 ♥2 5-Olson-Olson vs 2-Hannaford-Rhodes
50 3.00 1.00 2♥ N -1 ♦A 9-Nielsen-Nielsen vs 7-Phillips-Mastic
90 1.50 2.50 1N W 1 ♥4 3-Hedberg-Rasmussen vs 11-Poriss-Greenlee
90 1.50 2.50 1N W 1 ♥3 8-Williams-Tadken vs 4-Ainbinder-Staab
150 0.00 4.00 1N W 3 ♦J 6-Hall-Mix vs 10-Imdieke-Feller
|
4 |
♠KQJ854
♥T
♦AT972
♣5
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
♠7
♥AKQ965
♦K63
♣A42
|
♠9632
♥84
♦QJ
♣QJT73
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ 2♠ 1NT ♣3 ♥2 |
EW: 3♣ 4♥ ♦4 ♠4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 3.50 0.50 3♠ N 3 ♥8 11-Poriss-Greenlee vs 4-Ainbinder-Staab
140 3.50 0.50 2♠ N 3 ♥8 12-Waterman-Waterman vs 2-Hannaford-Rhodes
200 1.50 2.50 3♠ N -2 ♥8 6-Hall-Mix vs 3-Hedberg-Rasmussen
200 1.50 2.50 3♠ N -2 ♥4 9-Nielsen-Nielsen vs 5-Olson-Olson
400 0.00 4.00 4♠ N -4 ♥8 7-Phillips-Mastic vs 10-Imdieke-Feller
|
5 |
♠AK4
♥-
♦QJ85
♣AQJ972
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
♠J832
♥AQ2
♦T9432
♣T
|
♠95
♥K97543
♦A
♣K863
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 2♦ 2♠ 1NT ♥5 |
EW: 2♥ ♣2 ♦5 ♠5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
130 4.00 0.00 4♣ N 4 ♦A 6-Hall-Mix vs 3-Hedberg-Rasmussen
100 3.00 1.00 3♥* E -1 ♣5 11-Poriss-Greenlee vs 4-Ainbinder-Staab
140 2.00 2.00 3♥ E 3 ♣5 9-Nielsen-Nielsen vs 5-Olson-Olson
200 0.50 3.50 3N N -2 ♥3 12-Waterman-Waterman vs 2-Hannaford-Rhodes
200 0.50 3.50 4♠ S -2 ♣T 7-Phillips-Mastic vs 10-Imdieke-Feller
|
6 |
♠AT74
♥T843
♦T853
♣2
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
♠Q8653
♥75
♦J97
♣QJ8
|
♠J9
♥QJ6
♦42
♣AT9764
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 6♦ 6♥ 4♠ 5NT |
EW: ♣6/5 ♦1 ♥1 ♠3 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
460 3.50 0.50 3N S 5 ♠5 6-Hall-Mix vs 3-Hedberg-Rasmussen
460 3.50 0.50 3N S 5 ♠5 12-Waterman-Waterman vs 2-Hannaford-Rhodes
430 1.50 2.50 3N S 4 ♠5 11-Poriss-Greenlee vs 4-Ainbinder-Staab
430 1.50 2.50 3N S 4 ♥7 9-Nielsen-Nielsen vs 5-Olson-Olson
50 0.00 4.00 4N S -1 ♣Q 7-Phillips-Mastic vs 10-Imdieke-Feller
|
7 |
♠J92
♥AT86
♦KQ72
♣54
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
♠AQ4
♥Q975
♦T64
♣J83
|
♠KT876
♥J42
♦85
♣AQ2
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 4♦ 1♥ 1NT ♠5 |
EW: 1♠ ♣4 ♦3 ♥6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
130 4.00 0.00 3♦ N 4 ♠6 11-Poriss-Greenlee vs 5-Olson-Olson
110 3.00 1.00 2♦ N 3 ♠7 2-Hannaford-Rhodes vs 9-Nielsen-Nielsen
PASS 1.50 2.50 Pass Out 10-Imdieke-Feller vs 8-Williams-Tadken
PASS 1.50 2.50 Pass Out 12-Waterman-Waterman vs 3-Hedberg-Rasmussen
80 0.00 4.00 1♠ E 1 ♥K 7-Phillips-Mastic vs 4-Ainbinder-Staab
|
8 |
♠QJ8752
♥J32
♦A3
♣T3
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
♠9
♥Q985
♦KQT987
♣52
|
♠AT64
♥A4
♦6
♣AKQ876
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣2 ♦3 ♥4 ♠6 NT4 |
EW: 4♣ 4♦ 2♥ 1♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 4.00 0.00 5♦ W -1 ♠Q 12-Waterman-Waterman vs 3-Hedberg-Rasmussen
100 3.00 1.00 2♠ N -2 ♣A 11-Poriss-Greenlee vs 5-Olson-Olson
130 2.00 2.00 4♣ E 4 ♠K 7-Phillips-Mastic vs 4-Ainbinder-Staab
150 1.00 3.00 3♣ E 5 ♠K 2-Hannaford-Rhodes vs 9-Nielsen-Nielsen
400 0.00 4.00 3N E 3 ♠K 10-Imdieke-Feller vs 8-Williams-Tadken
|
9 |
♠65
♥Q982
♦J863
♣AJ6
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
♠AKQ9
♥AKJ3
♦Q42
♣K5
|
♠JT82
♥75
♦A975
♣984
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ ♦4 ♥5 ♠3 NT6 |
EW: 3♦ 1♥ 4♠ 1NT ♣6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
300 4.00 0.00 3N E -3 ♣3 2-Hannaford-Rhodes vs 9-Nielsen-Nielsen
100 2.00 2.00 3N W -1 ♠6 12-Waterman-Waterman vs 3-Hedberg-Rasmussen
100 2.00 2.00 3N W -1 ♥2 10-Imdieke-Feller vs 8-Williams-Tadken
100 2.00 2.00 4♠ W -1 ♠6 7-Phillips-Mastic vs 4-Ainbinder-Staab
660 0.00 4.00 3N W 5 ♥2 11-Poriss-Greenlee vs 5-Olson-Olson
|
10 |
♠973
♥A532
♦KJT65
♣9
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
♠T8
♥QJT87
♦-
♣KJ7532
|
♠J6542
♥94
♦874
♣QT8
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 7♦ 2♥ 4♠ 5NT ♣5 |
EW: 2♣ ♦0 ♥3 ♠2 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
1390 4.00 0.00 6♦ N 7 ♥9 11-Poriss-Greenlee vs 6-Hall-Mix
660 3.00 1.00 3N S 5 ♣4 12-Waterman-Waterman vs 4-Ainbinder-Staab
640 2.00 2.00 5♦ N 7 ♥9 2-Hannaford-Rhodes vs 7-Phillips-Mastic
190 1.00 3.00 4♦ S 7 ♥Q 10-Imdieke-Feller vs 9-Nielsen-Nielsen
100 0.00 4.00 6N S -1 ♥Q 8-Williams-Tadken vs 5-Olson-Olson
|
11 |
♠Q74
♥KJ43
♦962
♣QJ6
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
♠5
♥T962
♦AQT
♣AK532
|
♠AK963
♥87
♦KJ754
♣8
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦1 ♥4 ♠3 NT4 |
EW: 2♣ 5♦ 2♥ 3♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 4.00 0.00 2♦ E 3 ♦3 10-Imdieke-Feller vs 9-Nielsen-Nielsen
130 3.00 1.00 3♦ E 4 ♦8 12-Waterman-Waterman vs 4-Ainbinder-Staab
150 2.00 2.00 2N W 3 ♥3 11-Poriss-Greenlee vs 6-Hall-Mix
170 1.00 3.00 2♦ E 6 ♦3 8-Williams-Tadken vs 5-Olson-Olson
400 0.00 4.00 3N W 3 ♥3 2-Hannaford-Rhodes vs 7-Phillips-Mastic
|
12 |
♠KJ85
♥T32
♦K73
♣KQ7
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
♠QT43
♥985
♦854
♣JT6
|
♠A62
♥AK74
♦T2
♣A432
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 3♦ 1♥ 2♠ 2NT |
EW: ♣5 ♦4 ♥6 ♠5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
120 3.50 0.50 2N N 2 ♥A 12-Waterman-Waterman vs 4-Ainbinder-Staab
120 3.50 0.50 1N N 2 ♥4 11-Poriss-Greenlee vs 6-Hall-Mix
110 2.00 2.00 2♦ S 3 ♣J 10-Imdieke-Feller vs 9-Nielsen-Nielsen
90 0.50 3.50 2♦ S 2 ♠3 2-Hannaford-Rhodes vs 7-Phillips-Mastic
90 0.50 3.50 2♦ S 2 ♥9 8-Williams-Tadken vs 5-Olson-Olson
|
13 |
♠AK9
♥T9
♦AT654
♣AQ5
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
♠QT8652
♥AJ854
♦Q3
♣-
|
♠J43
♥KQ6
♦87
♣JT832
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 3♦ 2NT ♥4 ♠4 |
EW: 1♥ 2♠ ♣4 ♦2 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
400 4.00 0.00 2♦ W -4 ♠A 4-Ainbinder-Staab vs 2-Hannaford-Rhodes
270 3.00 1.00 1N N 7 ♣2 3-Hedberg-Rasmussen vs 8-Williams-Tadken
240 2.00 2.00 1N N 6 ♣J 12-Waterman-Waterman vs 5-Olson-Olson
200 1.00 3.00 4♠* W -1 ♥T 7-Phillips-Mastic vs 11-Poriss-Greenlee
110 0.00 4.00 2♠ W 2 ♥T 9-Nielsen-Nielsen vs 6-Hall-Mix
|
14 |
♠T96
♥K8
♦KJ84
♣KT98
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
♠AKJ85
♥Q9732
♦93
♣7
|
♠Q42
♥A65
♦QT7
♣QJ62
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 2♦ ♥4 ♠4 NT5 |
EW: 3♥ 3♠ 1NT ♣5 ♦5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 3.50 0.50 4♠ W -1 ♠T 7-Phillips-Mastic vs 11-Poriss-Greenlee
50 3.50 0.50 3♠ W -1 ♠6 12-Waterman-Waterman vs 5-Olson-Olson
PASS 1.50 2.50 Pass Out 3-Hedberg-Rasmussen vs 8-Williams-Tadken
PASS 1.50 2.50 Pass Out 9-Nielsen-Nielsen vs 6-Hall-Mix
110 0.00 4.00 2♥ W 2 ♠6 4-Ainbinder-Staab vs 2-Hannaford-Rhodes
|
15 |
♠J852
♥AJT7
♦A2
♣AT5
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
♠KT743
♥Q654
♦KJ8
♣6
|
♠96
♥983
♦96
♣QJ7432
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 5♦ 3/4♥ 3♠ 4NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦2 ♥2 ♠4 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
660 4.00 0.00 3N N 5 ♣7 4-Ainbinder-Staab vs 2-Hannaford-Rhodes
630 1.50 2.50 3N N 4 ♠9 7-Phillips-Mastic vs 11-Poriss-Greenlee
630 1.50 2.50 3N N 4 ♠9 9-Nielsen-Nielsen vs 6-Hall-Mix
630 1.50 2.50 3N N 4 ♣Q 3-Hedberg-Rasmussen vs 8-Williams-Tadken
630 1.50 2.50 3N N 4 ♣Q 12-Waterman-Waterman vs 5-Olson-Olson
|
16 |
♠9
♥AQ7654
♦Q
♣KJT97
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
♠KQJT42
♥9
♦AJ6
♣Q84
|
♠76
♥J83
♦KT9532
♣A3
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 5♥ ♦2 ♠2 NT6 |
EW: 4♦ 4♠ ♣2 ♥2 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
690 4.00 0.00 4♥* N 5 ♠K 4-Ainbinder-Staab vs 9-Nielsen-Nielsen
420 3.00 1.00 4♥ N 4 ♠4 12-Waterman-Waterman vs 6-Hall-Mix
200 2.00 2.00 3♥ N 5 ♠7 5-Olson-Olson vs 3-Hedberg-Rasmussen
200 1.00 3.00 3♠ W 5 ♦Q 2-Hannaford-Rhodes vs 10-Imdieke-Feller
230 0.00 4.00 2♠ W 6 ♦Q 8-Williams-Tadken vs 11-Poriss-Greenlee
|
17 |
♠KT764
♥J2
♦AQJT8
♣4
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
♠QJ3
♥9864
♦K64
♣K93
|
♠982
♥AKQT75
♦-
♣AQ62
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♦ 1♠ ♣6 ♥2 NT4 |
EW: 1♣ 4♥ ♦2 ♠5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
550 4.00 0.00 5♦* N 5 ♥K 4-Ainbinder-Staab vs 9-Nielsen-Nielsen
420 2.50 1.50 4♠ E 4 ♠A 12-Waterman-Waterman vs 6-Hall-Mix
420 2.50 1.50 4♥ E 4 ♥A 5-Olson-Olson vs 3-Hedberg-Rasmussen
450 0.50 3.50 5♥ E 5 ♠A 2-Hannaford-Rhodes vs 10-Imdieke-Feller
450 0.50 3.50 4♥ W 5 ♣4 8-Williams-Tadken vs 11-Poriss-Greenlee
|
18 |
♠75
♥J953
♦T6
♣KJ643
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
♠J96
♥A84
♦KQ9543
♣9
|
♠AKT432
♥Q76
♦A
♣QT7
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ ♦3 ♥5 ♠1 NT2 |
EW: 4/3♦ 2/1♥ 5/4♠ 3NT ♣5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 4.00 0.00 4♠ E 4 ♣A 4-Ainbinder-Staab vs 9-Nielsen-Nielsen
450 3.00 1.00 4♠ E 5 ♣A 12-Waterman-Waterman vs 6-Hall-Mix
480 1.00 3.00 4♠ E 6 ♦2 5-Olson-Olson vs 3-Hedberg-Rasmussen
480 1.00 3.00 4♠ E 6 ♣2 2-Hannaford-Rhodes vs 10-Imdieke-Feller
480 1.00 3.00 4♠ E 6 ♣2 8-Williams-Tadken vs 11-Poriss-Greenlee
|
19 |
♠Q65
♥9642
♦A5
♣J984
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
♠A94
♥AQJ8
♦862
♣AK5
|
♠J72
♥T3
♦KQ74
♣T762
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4 ♦4 ♥5 ♠5 NT4 |
EW: 3♣ 2♦ 2♥ 2♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 4.00 0.00 2♥ W 2 ♦A 2-Hannaford-Rhodes vs 8-Williams-Tadken
120 2.50 1.50 2N W 2 ♥2 10-Imdieke-Feller vs 3-Hedberg-Rasmussen
120 2.50 1.50 1N W 2 ♥2 11-Poriss-Greenlee vs 9-Nielsen-Nielsen
600 1.00 3.00 3N W 3 ♦A 12-Waterman-Waterman vs 7-Phillips-Mastic
630 0.00 4.00 3N E 4 ♠3 6-Hall-Mix vs 4-Ainbinder-Staab
|
20 |
♠AK8
♥KT97
♦QJ32
♣65
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
♠JT63
♥8653
♦AT9
♣84
|
♠97
♥AJ4
♦876
♣AK972
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 2♦ 2♥ 2♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣5 ♦4 ♥5/4 ♠5 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
600 4.00 0.00 3N S 3 ♣8 10-Imdieke-Feller vs 3-Hedberg-Rasmussen
300 3.00 1.00 2♣ E -3 ♦3 12-Waterman-Waterman vs 7-Phillips-Mastic
150 2.00 2.00 2N S 3 ♣8 11-Poriss-Greenlee vs 9-Nielsen-Nielsen
PASS 1.00 3.00 Pass Out 6-Hall-Mix vs 4-Ainbinder-Staab
100 0.00 4.00 2N N -1 ♣A 2-Hannaford-Rhodes vs 8-Williams-Tadken
|
21 |
♠T83
♥T985
♦K872
♣A2
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
♠97652
♥AJ3
♦A
♣KT86
|
♠KJ
♥K742
♦943
♣QJ75
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ ♣3 ♥5 ♠5 NT6 |
EW: 4♣ 2♥ 2♠ ♦4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.00 0.00 1N E -2 ♦Q 11-Poriss-Greenlee vs 9-Nielsen-Nielsen
90 3.00 1.00 2♦ S 2 ♠7 6-Hall-Mix vs 4-Ainbinder-Staab
50 2.00 2.00 2♥ E -1 ♦Q 10-Imdieke-Feller vs 3-Hedberg-Rasmussen
90 1.00 3.00 2♣ E 2 ♥Q 12-Waterman-Waterman vs 7-Phillips-Mastic
110 0.00 4.00 2♥ E 2 ♦Q 2-Hannaford-Rhodes vs 8-Williams-Tadken
|
22 |
♠863
♥52
♦K953
♣K964
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
♠JT4
♥76
♦QJ76
♣8752
|
♠AQ
♥AKT98
♦T842
♣QJ
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 1♥ 2♠ 1NT ♦6 |
EW: 1♦ ♣5 ♥6 ♠4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 3.00 1.00 2♠ S 3 ♠2 10-Imdieke-Feller vs 4-Ainbinder-Staab
140 3.00 1.00 2♠ S 3 ♥7 3-Hedberg-Rasmussen vs 9-Nielsen-Nielsen
140 3.00 1.00 2♠ S 3 ♥5 12-Waterman-Waterman vs 8-Williams-Tadken
110 1.00 3.00 1♠ S 2 ♦Q 6-Hall-Mix vs 2-Hannaford-Rhodes
50 0.00 4.00 3N N -1 ♥A 7-Phillips-Mastic vs 5-Olson-Olson
|
23 |
♠K87
♥KJ7
♦AKQ72
♣95
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
♠J
♥A9543
♦JT854
♣Q2
|
♠T942
♥T86
♦-
♣JT8743
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 5♦ 2♥ 5/4♠ 6NT |
EW: ♣5 ♦2 ♥5 ♠2 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
660 4.00 0.00 3N N 5 ♣J 6-Hall-Mix vs 2-Hannaford-Rhodes
650 2.50 1.50 4♠ S 5 ♠J 7-Phillips-Mastic vs 5-Olson-Olson
650 2.50 1.50 4♠ S 5 ♥A 10-Imdieke-Feller vs 4-Ainbinder-Staab
620 1.00 3.00 4♠ S 4 ♣Q 3-Hedberg-Rasmussen vs 9-Nielsen-Nielsen
100 0.00 4.00 6♠ S -1 ♥A 12-Waterman-Waterman vs 8-Williams-Tadken
|
24 |
♠AJ3
♥J
♦Q9752
♣QT63
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
♠Q86
♥K53
♦AT8
♣AJ95
|
♠K9754
♥864
♦4
♣K872
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♦ 1♥ 1NT ♣5 ♠5 |
EW: 2♣ 1/2♠ ♦2 ♥5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 4.00 0.00 4♦ N 5 ♣2 3-Hedberg-Rasmussen vs 9-Nielsen-Nielsen
50 3.00 1.00 3♠ E -1 ♣4 7-Phillips-Mastic vs 5-Olson-Olson
50 1.50 2.50 3N N -1 ♣2 6-Hall-Mix vs 2-Hannaford-Rhodes
50 1.50 2.50 3♥ S -1 ♠Q 10-Imdieke-Feller vs 4-Ainbinder-Staab
140 0.00 4.00 2♠ E 3 ♣3 12-Waterman-Waterman vs 8-Williams-Tadken
|
25 |
♠Q975
♥AT
♦QT8
♣QJ32
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
♠KJ642
♥Q92
♦4
♣AT65
|
♠AT
♥KJ73
♦AK753
♣K4
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦3 ♥2 ♠2 NT2 |
EW: 4♣ 4♦ 5♥ 4/5♠ 4/5NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
600 3.50 0.50 3N E 3 ♦2 7-Phillips-Mastic vs 3-Hedberg-Rasmussen
600 3.50 0.50 3N E 3 ♦2 8-Williams-Tadken vs 6-Hall-Mix
630 1.50 2.50 3N E 4 ♦2 2-Hannaford-Rhodes vs 11-Poriss-Greenlee
630 1.50 2.50 3N E 4 ♣9 12-Waterman-Waterman vs 9-Nielsen-Nielsen
660 0.00 4.00 3N E 5 ♥8 5-Olson-Olson vs 10-Imdieke-Feller
|
26 |
♠T93
♥Q852
♦872
♣K54
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
♠K76
♥K7
♦AJ95
♣A876
|
♠Q85
♥9643
♦K4
♣JT92
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦5/6 ♥5 ♠5 NT4 |
EW: 3♣ 1♦ 2♥ 1♠ 2NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.00 0.00 1N W -1 ♠T 12-Waterman-Waterman vs 9-Nielsen-Nielsen
120 2.00 2.00 1N W 2 ♥2 8-Williams-Tadken vs 6-Hall-Mix
120 2.00 2.00 1N W 2 ♦8 5-Olson-Olson vs 10-Imdieke-Feller
120 2.00 2.00 1N W 2 ♦8 7-Phillips-Mastic vs 3-Hedberg-Rasmussen
150 0.00 4.00 1N W 3 ♥2 2-Hannaford-Rhodes vs 11-Poriss-Greenlee
|
27 |
♠KQT2
♥AK32
♦963
♣64
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
♠A875
♥86
♦T42
♣K987
|
♠J963
♥T97
♦QJ7
♣QT5
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 4♦ 5♥ 2♠ 2/3NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦3 ♥2 ♠5 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
450 4.00 0.00 4♥ N 5 ♦Q 12-Waterman-Waterman vs 9-Nielsen-Nielsen
420 2.00 2.00 4♥ N 4 ♠3 5-Olson-Olson vs 10-Imdieke-Feller
420 2.00 2.00 4♥ N 4 ♠3 7-Phillips-Mastic vs 3-Hedberg-Rasmussen
420 2.00 2.00 4♥ N 4 ♥T 2-Hannaford-Rhodes vs 11-Poriss-Greenlee
170 0.00 4.00 2♥ N 4 ♦Q 8-Williams-Tadken vs 6-Hall-Mix
|