1 |
♠T95
♥KJ3
♦AQJ9
♣A52
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
♠-
♥A42
♦T632
♣K98763
|
♠A32
♥QT986
♦54
♣QJ4
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 5♠ ♣4 ♥5 NT6 |
EW: 3♣ 1♥ ♦4 ♠2 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
450 2.00 2.00 4♠ S 5 ♥A 6-Besteman-Sater vs 5-Wilson-Wilson
450 2.00 2.00 4♠ N 5 ♥6 9-Abbott-Bayle vs 2-Lean-Lean
450 2.00 2.00 4♠ N 5 ♦5 4-Fisher-Cockerill vs 1-Urie-Hintz
450 2.00 2.00 4♠ N 5 ♦5 10-Spears-McCandless vs 8-Kittock-Smith
450 2.00 2.00 4♠ N 5 ♣Q 7-Bujanovich-Roberts vs 3-Bellinger-Ainbinder
|
2 |
♠J74
♥5
♦KT753
♣9654
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
♠AT6
♥Q98642
♦J
♣AQ3
|
♠852
♥AT7
♦AQ9864
♣T
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ ♦4 ♥2 ♠5 NT3 |
EW: 3♦ 5/4♥ 1♠ 3NT ♣5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 4.00 0.00 3♦ E -3 ♠K 4-Fisher-Cockerill vs 1-Urie-Hintz
100 3.00 1.00 3♦ E -2 ♠3 6-Besteman-Sater vs 5-Wilson-Wilson
170 2.00 2.00 3♥ W 4 ♦3 7-Bujanovich-Roberts vs 3-Bellinger-Ainbinder
420 1.00 3.00 4♥ W 4 ♣9 10-Spears-McCandless vs 8-Kittock-Smith
1100 0.00 4.00 5♣* S -4 ♥Q 9-Abbott-Bayle vs 2-Lean-Lean
|
3 |
♠A7
♥AQ7
♦KJ2
♣A9652
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
♠JT9852
♥T
♦A943
♣QT
|
♠K643
♥KJ965
♦Q876
♣-
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 2♥ 2NT ♦4 ♠3/2 |
EW: 2♦ 4♠ ♣3 ♥5 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 4.00 0.00 4♠* E -1 ♣A 4-Fisher-Cockerill vs 1-Urie-Hintz
130 2.50 1.50 2♣ N 4 ♠3 10-Spears-McCandless vs 8-Kittock-Smith
130 2.50 1.50 2♣ N 4 ♦6 9-Abbott-Bayle vs 2-Lean-Lean
620 0.50 3.50 4♠ W 4 ♥7 7-Bujanovich-Roberts vs 3-Bellinger-Ainbinder
620 0.50 3.50 4♠ W 4 ♣A 6-Besteman-Sater vs 5-Wilson-Wilson
|
4 |
♠AT93
♥K742
♦Q875
♣7
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
♠Q4
♥T53
♦KJT3
♣AKQ3
|
♠J852
♥A9
♦642
♣T962
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♥ 2♠ 1NT ♣6 ♦6 |
EW: 1♣ ♦6 ♥4 ♠5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 3.50 0.50 3N W -2 ♠T 8-Kittock-Smith vs 4-Fisher-Cockerill
200 3.50 0.50 2N W -2 ♦5 10-Spears-McCandless vs 9-Abbott-Bayle
170 2.00 2.00 1♥ S 4 ♣A 7-Bujanovich-Roberts vs 6-Besteman-Sater
120 1.00 3.00 1N S 2 ♣A 5-Wilson-Wilson vs 2-Lean-Lean
90 0.00 4.00 1N W 1 ♦5 1-Urie-Hintz vs 3-Bellinger-Ainbinder
|
5 |
♠QT54
♥K652
♦AK4
♣42
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
♠J7
♥973
♦T963
♣9753
|
♠K863
♥QJT
♦75
♣AKQ8
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 3♦ 3♥ 2♠ 2NT |
EW: ♣6 ♦4 ♥4 ♠4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
120 3.50 0.50 2N S 2 ♥9 8-Kittock-Smith vs 4-Fisher-Cockerill
120 3.50 0.50 2N S 2 ♣3 10-Spears-McCandless vs 9-Abbott-Bayle
100 1.50 2.50 2N S -1 ♦3 5-Wilson-Wilson vs 2-Lean-Lean
100 1.50 2.50 3♠ N -1 ♣A 1-Urie-Hintz vs 3-Bellinger-Ainbinder
200 0.00 4.00 3N S -2 ♥9 7-Bujanovich-Roberts vs 6-Besteman-Sater
|
6 |
♠Q3
♥Q54
♦K72
♣KQT86
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
♠JT976
♥K3
♦T93
♣A72
|
♠K82
♥J7
♦AQJ8
♣J943
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ ♣5 ♦4/3 ♠3 NT3 |
EW: 1/2♣ 2♦ 4♠ 1NT ♥5/6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 4.00 0.00 2♥ S 2 ♠9 7-Bujanovich-Roberts vs 6-Besteman-Sater
100 2.50 1.50 3♠ W -1 ♥Q 5-Wilson-Wilson vs 2-Lean-Lean
100 2.50 1.50 3♠ W -1 ♥4 1-Urie-Hintz vs 3-Bellinger-Ainbinder
50 1.00 3.00 4♥ S -1 ♠6 10-Spears-McCandless vs 9-Abbott-Bayle
100 0.00 4.00 4♥ S -2 ♠J 8-Kittock-Smith vs 4-Fisher-Cockerill
|
7 |
♠JT74
♥KJ652
♦KT
♣Q9
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
♠-
♥AT83
♦AJ7
♣AT8732
|
♠A932
♥74
♦986532
♣4
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♠ ♣6 ♦2 ♥6 NT5 |
EW: 1♣ 4♦ 2NT ♥6 ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.00 0.00 3♠ S -1 ♦A 2-Lean-Lean vs 4-Fisher-Cockerill
200 1.50 2.50 4♠ S -2 ♣A 8-Kittock-Smith vs 7-Bujanovich-Roberts
200 1.50 2.50 4♠ S -2 ♣A 9-Abbott-Bayle vs 5-Wilson-Wilson
200 1.50 2.50 4♠ S -2 ♣A 10-Spears-McCandless vs 1-Urie-Hintz
200 1.50 2.50 2♥ N -2 ♣4 6-Besteman-Sater vs 3-Bellinger-Ainbinder
|
8 |
♠Q96
♥7652
♦KT3
♣J42
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
♠J3
♥K9843
♦Q765
♣AQ
|
♠A42
♥AJT
♦AJ82
♣865
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6 ♦1 ♥2 ♠6 NT2 |
EW: 6♦ 5♥ 1♠ 4NT ♣6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 3.50 0.50 3N E -1 ♣7 6-Besteman-Sater vs 3-Bellinger-Ainbinder
50 3.50 0.50 4♥ W -1 ♠6 9-Abbott-Bayle vs 5-Wilson-Wilson
420 2.00 2.00 4♥ W 4 ♠6 10-Spears-McCandless vs 1-Urie-Hintz
450 1.00 3.00 4♥ W 5 ♠6 8-Kittock-Smith vs 7-Bujanovich-Roberts
480 0.00 4.00 4♥ W 6 ♣2 2-Lean-Lean vs 4-Fisher-Cockerill
|
9 |
♠J53
♥98
♦T873
♣AKQ3
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
♠Q8
♥QT3
♦AJ2
♣JT842
|
♠K2
♥AKJ52
♦K64
♣765
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♠ ♣4 ♦6 ♥4 NT4 |
EW: 3♣ 1♦ 3♥ 3NT ♠4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 3.50 0.50 4♥ E -2 ♠A 2-Lean-Lean vs 4-Fisher-Cockerill
200 3.50 0.50 4♥ E -2 ♠A 9-Abbott-Bayle vs 5-Wilson-Wilson
100 2.00 2.00 4♥ E -1 ♠A 10-Spears-McCandless vs 1-Urie-Hintz
50 1.00 3.00 3♠ S -1 ♥Q 8-Kittock-Smith vs 7-Bujanovich-Roberts
100 0.00 4.00 3♠ S -2 ♥Q 6-Besteman-Sater vs 3-Bellinger-Ainbinder
|
10 |
♠AQ
♥QT85
♦K2
♣AKT93
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
♠KT962
♥K7
♦AJT8
♣85
|
♠753
♥AJ964
♦543
♣J2
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 1♦ 2NT ♥6 ♠5 |
EW: 1♥ 2♠ ♣3 ♦6 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
130 3.50 0.50 3♣ N 4 ♠5 3-Bellinger-Ainbinder vs 5-Wilson-Wilson
130 3.50 0.50 3♣ N 4 ♠3 7-Bujanovich-Roberts vs 4-Fisher-Cockerill
100 2.00 2.00 2♠ W -1 ♣A 10-Spears-McCandless vs 2-Lean-Lean
100 1.00 3.00 5♣ N -1 ♠7 9-Abbott-Bayle vs 8-Kittock-Smith
200 0.00 4.00 2N S -2 ♠6 1-Urie-Hintz vs 6-Besteman-Sater
|
11 |
♠T
♥QT843
♦KJ
♣AQ982
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
♠QJ542
♥A65
♦AQ973
♣-
|
♠K9873
♥-
♦T542
♣KJT7
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 3♥ 1NT ♦2 ♠2 |
EW: 5♦ 5♠ ♣5 ♥4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
450 2.00 2.00 5♠ W 5 ♥3 3-Bellinger-Ainbinder vs 5-Wilson-Wilson
450 2.00 2.00 5♠ W 5 ♥3 7-Bujanovich-Roberts vs 4-Fisher-Cockerill
450 2.00 2.00 4♠ W 5 ♥3 10-Spears-McCandless vs 2-Lean-Lean
450 2.00 2.00 4♠ W 5 ♥2 1-Urie-Hintz vs 6-Besteman-Sater
450 2.00 2.00 4♠ W 5 ♣8 9-Abbott-Bayle vs 8-Kittock-Smith
|
12 |
♠97
♥KJ7542
♦9
♣T964
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
♠A853
♥Q
♦AKQ3
♣KQ53
|
♠Q6
♥863
♦JT752
♣J72
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♥ 2♠ 1NT ♣5 ♦3 |
EW: 2♣ 4♦ ♥3 ♠5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 4.00 0.00 5♦ W -1 ♥2 9-Abbott-Bayle vs 8-Kittock-Smith
100 3.00 1.00 2♠ S -1 ♦A 1-Urie-Hintz vs 6-Besteman-Sater
110 2.00 2.00 2♦ W 3 ♠9 10-Spears-McCandless vs 2-Lean-Lean
130 0.50 3.50 4♦ W 4 ♥2 3-Bellinger-Ainbinder vs 5-Wilson-Wilson
130 0.50 3.50 2♦ W 4 ♠9 7-Bujanovich-Roberts vs 4-Fisher-Cockerill
|
13 |
♠84
♥KQ92
♦KJT
♣KQ92
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
♠T653
♥T43
♦Q32
♣A84
|
♠QJ2
♥A87
♦A7
♣JT765
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 3♦ 3♥ 2♠ 2NT |
EW: ♣5 ♦3/4 ♥3/4 ♠5 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
180 3.00 1.00 2N N 4 ♣J 10-Spears-McCandless vs 3-Bellinger-Ainbinder
180 3.00 1.00 1N N 4 ♦A 4-Fisher-Cockerill vs 6-Besteman-Sater
180 3.00 1.00 1N N 4 ♣J 1-Urie-Hintz vs 9-Abbott-Bayle
90 1.00 3.00 1N N 1 ♣6 2-Lean-Lean vs 7-Bujanovich-Roberts
100 0.00 4.00 1N N -1 ♣6 8-Kittock-Smith vs 5-Wilson-Wilson
|
14 |
♠75
♥A742
♦J64
♣Q654
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
♠9643
♥Q
♦KQ83
♣AJ73
|
♠A82
♥T965
♦972
♣K82
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1/2♥ -/1NT ♣6 ♦6 ♠5/6 NT6/7 |
EW: 1♣ 1♦ ♥5 ♠6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 4.00 0.00 2♥ N 3 ♠2 4-Fisher-Cockerill vs 6-Besteman-Sater
120 3.00 1.00 1N S 2 ♣3 8-Kittock-Smith vs 5-Wilson-Wilson
110 1.50 2.50 2♥ N 2 ♦9 2-Lean-Lean vs 7-Bujanovich-Roberts
110 1.50 2.50 2♥ N 2 ♦9 10-Spears-McCandless vs 3-Bellinger-Ainbinder
50 0.00 4.00 1♠ W -1 ♦4 1-Urie-Hintz vs 9-Abbott-Bayle
|
15 |
♠AT62
♥KQ
♦AT2
♣JT32
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
♠Q93
♥JT54
♦KJ3
♣AQ4
|
♠75
♥A972
♦974
♣K976
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 3♠ ♣6 ♥5 NT6 |
EW: 1♣ 2♥ ♦5 ♠4 NT5/6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 3.50 0.50 2♥ E -1 ♠K 2-Lean-Lean vs 7-Bujanovich-Roberts
50 3.50 0.50 2♣ W -1 ♥K 1-Urie-Hintz vs 9-Abbott-Bayle
110 2.00 2.00 2♥ E 2 ♣8 8-Kittock-Smith vs 5-Wilson-Wilson
140 1.00 3.00 2♥ E 3 ♣8 10-Spears-McCandless vs 3-Bellinger-Ainbinder
200 0.00 4.00 2♠ N -2 ♣K 4-Fisher-Cockerill vs 6-Besteman-Sater
|
16 |
♠KQ983
♥KT852
♦83
♣K
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
♠62
♥Q6
♦AK942
♣7652
|
♠JT
♥J97
♦QJT7
♣AJ98
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 3♥ 3♠ 1NT ♦6 |
EW: 1♦ ♣6 ♥4 ♠4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 4.00 0.00 4♠ N 4 ♦Q 10-Spears-McCandless vs 4-Fisher-Cockerill
140 3.00 1.00 3♠ N 3 ♦Q 2-Lean-Lean vs 1-Urie-Hintz
PASS 1.50 2.50 Pass Out 3-Bellinger-Ainbinder vs 8-Kittock-Smith
PASS 1.50 2.50 Pass Out 5-Wilson-Wilson vs 7-Bujanovich-Roberts
50 0.00 4.00 4♠ N -1 ♦Q 9-Abbott-Bayle vs 6-Besteman-Sater
|
17 |
♠AT95
♥875
♦Q642
♣AQ
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
♠K742
♥K
♦A5
♣J97652
|
♠J863
♥QJT92
♦J98
♣K
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 3♦ 2♥ 2NT ♠6 |
EW: -/1♠ ♣5 ♦4 ♥5 ♠6/7 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 4.00 0.00 2♦ N 3 ♣K 2-Lean-Lean vs 1-Urie-Hintz
100 3.00 1.00 2♣ W -2 ♠A 3-Bellinger-Ainbinder vs 8-Kittock-Smith
50 1.00 3.00 2♥ S -1 ♦A 9-Abbott-Bayle vs 6-Besteman-Sater
50 1.00 3.00 3♦ N -1 ♣K 10-Spears-McCandless vs 4-Fisher-Cockerill
50 1.00 3.00 2♦ N -1 ♥Q 5-Wilson-Wilson vs 7-Bujanovich-Roberts
|
18 |
♠K9
♥QJ
♦K9852
♣7532
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
♠A74
♥75
♦QJT3
♣QJ94
|
♠QJT6
♥AT82
♦A76
♣A8
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦5 ♥5 ♠4 NT3 |
EW: 2/3♣ 2♦ 1♥ 2♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
120 4.00 0.00 1N E 2 ♥4 9-Abbott-Bayle vs 6-Besteman-Sater
400 1.50 2.50 3N E 3 ♥6 5-Wilson-Wilson vs 7-Bujanovich-Roberts
400 1.50 2.50 3N E 3 ♥4 10-Spears-McCandless vs 4-Fisher-Cockerill
400 1.50 2.50 3N E 3 ♥3 2-Lean-Lean vs 1-Urie-Hintz
400 1.50 2.50 3N E 3 ♥3 3-Bellinger-Ainbinder vs 8-Kittock-Smith
|
19 |
♠42
♥Q873
♦AK94
♣842
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
♠AQ8
♥K52
♦JT872
♣96
|
♠7653
♥T9
♦Q53
♣AJ75
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2/1♣ 2/3♥ 1♠ 1NT ♦5/6 |
EW: 1♦ ♣5 ♥4 ♠5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 4.00 0.00 4♥ N 4 ♦Q 4-Fisher-Cockerill vs 9-Abbott-Bayle
140 3.00 1.00 2♥ N 3 ♠7 10-Spears-McCandless vs 5-Wilson-Wilson
110 2.00 2.00 2♥ N 2 ♠3 3-Bellinger-Ainbinder vs 2-Lean-Lean
50 1.00 3.00 1N S -1 ♦7 6-Besteman-Sater vs 8-Kittock-Smith
100 0.00 4.00 4♥ N -2 ♦Q 1-Urie-Hintz vs 7-Bujanovich-Roberts
|
20 |
♠4
♥AKJ65
♦KJT96
♣AK
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
♠A86
♥Q4
♦AQ543
♣962
|
♠KJ32
♥T9872
♦-
♣JT75
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2/1♣ 3♦ 2♥ 1♠ 2NT |
EW: ♣5 ♦4 ♥5 ♠6 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 4.00 0.00 2♥ N 2 ♣J 10-Spears-McCandless vs 5-Wilson-Wilson
100 1.50 2.50 2♠ S -1 ♣6 6-Besteman-Sater vs 8-Kittock-Smith
100 1.50 2.50 2♠ N -1 ♦Q 1-Urie-Hintz vs 7-Bujanovich-Roberts
100 1.50 2.50 3♥ N -1 ♠2 3-Bellinger-Ainbinder vs 2-Lean-Lean
100 1.50 2.50 3♥ N -1 ♠2 4-Fisher-Cockerill vs 9-Abbott-Bayle
|
21 |
♠985
♥KJT6
♦AK4
♣A43
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
♠Q642
♥A98532
♦6
♣82
|
♠T73
♥Q7
♦85
♣JT9765
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 6♦ 2♥ 4/3♠ 6NT |
EW: ♣5 ♦1 ♥4 ♠3 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
720 4.00 0.00 3N N 7 ♣J 3-Bellinger-Ainbinder vs 2-Lean-Lean
690 2.50 1.50 4N N 6 ♣J 4-Fisher-Cockerill vs 9-Abbott-Bayle
690 2.50 1.50 3N N 6 ♥Q 1-Urie-Hintz vs 7-Bujanovich-Roberts
620 1.00 3.00 5♦ S 6 ♥A 10-Spears-McCandless vs 5-Wilson-Wilson
170 0.00 4.00 3♦ S 6 ♥A 6-Besteman-Sater vs 8-Kittock-Smith
|
22 |
♠K983
♥T87
♦KJ95
♣A3
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
♠Q74
♥J65
♦Q83
♣J975
|
♠AJT6
♥Q2
♦742
♣KQ86
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ 3♥ 1♠ 1NT ♣6 |
EW: 1♣ ♦4 ♥4 ♠6 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 3.50 0.50 3♥ S 4 ♠4 7-Bujanovich-Roberts vs 9-Abbott-Bayle
170 3.50 0.50 3♥ S 4 ♣5 5-Wilson-Wilson vs 1-Urie-Hintz
140 2.00 2.00 2♥ S 3 ♣7 10-Spears-McCandless vs 6-Besteman-Sater
110 1.00 3.00 1♠ N 2 ♣K 4-Fisher-Cockerill vs 3-Bellinger-Ainbinder
50 0.00 4.00 2♥ S -1 ♣5 2-Lean-Lean vs 8-Kittock-Smith
|
23 |
♠62
♥AK98
♦AT3
♣K973
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
♠5
♥65
♦97542
♣JT865
|
♠AJT3
♥J32
♦KQJ8
♣42
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 5♥ 5♠ 2NT ♦6 |
EW: ♣4 ♦6 ♥1 ♠2 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
650 4.00 0.00 4♥ S 5 ♠5 10-Spears-McCandless vs 6-Besteman-Sater
620 2.00 2.00 4♠ S 4 ♦2 7-Bujanovich-Roberts vs 9-Abbott-Bayle
620 2.00 2.00 4♥ S 4 ♦2 5-Wilson-Wilson vs 1-Urie-Hintz
620 2.00 2.00 4♥ N 4 ♦K 4-Fisher-Cockerill vs 3-Bellinger-Ainbinder
600 0.00 4.00 3N N 3 ♦K 2-Lean-Lean vs 8-Kittock-Smith
|
24 |
♠AQ42
♥AJ6
♦543
♣953
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
♠KT53
♥T97
♦A
♣KJ862
|
♠6
♥Q532
♦Q9872
♣T74
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: -/1♣ 2♦ 1♥ 4♠ 2/5NT ♣6/7 |
EW: ♣6 ♦4 ♥5 ♠3 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 4.00 0.00 4♠ N 4 ♦9 10-Spears-McCandless vs 6-Besteman-Sater
180 3.00 1.00 2N N 4 ♠6 7-Bujanovich-Roberts vs 9-Abbott-Bayle
170 2.00 2.00 2♠ N 4 ♥2 4-Fisher-Cockerill vs 3-Bellinger-Ainbinder
150 1.00 3.00 2♦ E -3 ♠J 2-Lean-Lean vs 8-Kittock-Smith
140 0.00 4.00 2♠ N 3 ♣T 5-Wilson-Wilson vs 1-Urie-Hintz
|
25 |
♠T32
♥AJ
♦AKQ5
♣KJ75
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
♠64
♥KQ853
♦732
♣T43
|
♠A98
♥7642
♦JT8
♣962
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 5♦ 2♥ 5♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣2 ♦1 ♥4 ♠1 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
490 4.00 0.00 3N N 6 ♦J 10-Spears-McCandless vs 7-Bujanovich-Roberts
480 3.00 1.00 5♠ N 6 ♦J 8-Kittock-Smith vs 1-Urie-Hintz
460 2.00 2.00 3N N 5 ♦9 6-Besteman-Sater vs 2-Lean-Lean
400 1.00 3.00 3N N 3 ♥2 3-Bellinger-Ainbinder vs 9-Abbott-Bayle
50 0.00 4.00 6♠ S -1 ♥K 5-Wilson-Wilson vs 4-Fisher-Cockerill
|
26 |
♠JT83
♥96
♦KQ42
♣KQT
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
♠Q972
♥Q42
♦T5
♣A942
|
♠K64
♥A753
♦976
♣873
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 4♦ 2♥ 2♠ 2NT |
EW: ♣5 ♦3 ♥5 ♠5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
630 4.00 0.00 3N S 4 ♥2 10-Spears-McCandless vs 7-Bujanovich-Roberts
600 2.50 1.50 3N S 3 ♦T 8-Kittock-Smith vs 1-Urie-Hintz
600 2.50 1.50 3N S 3 ♣2 5-Wilson-Wilson vs 4-Fisher-Cockerill
150 1.00 3.00 1N S 3 ♣2 3-Bellinger-Ainbinder vs 9-Abbott-Bayle
110 0.00 4.00 3♦ S 3 ♣A 6-Besteman-Sater vs 2-Lean-Lean
|
27 |
♠8
♥98543
♦AT
♣KJ753
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
♠T942
♥JT62
♦93
♣942
|
♠J7653
♥KQ
♦KQJ62
♣A
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 1♦ 3♥ 3/2NT ♠5 |
EW: 2♠ ♣2 ♦6 ♥4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
400 4.00 0.00 5♣ N 5 ♥K 8-Kittock-Smith vs 1-Urie-Hintz
140 2.50 1.50 2♥ S 3 ♦9 5-Wilson-Wilson vs 4-Fisher-Cockerill
140 2.50 1.50 2♥ S 3 ♦9 10-Spears-McCandless vs 7-Bujanovich-Roberts
110 1.00 3.00 2♥ S 2 ♦3 3-Bellinger-Ainbinder vs 9-Abbott-Bayle
50 0.00 4.00 3♠ E -1 ♥A 6-Besteman-Sater vs 2-Lean-Lean
|