1 |
♠T87
♥K854
♦KT95
♣T9
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
♠632
♥QT976
♦A82
♣Q7
|
♠QJ54
♥A2
♦J74
♣8643
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 4♦ 2♥ 3♠ 2NT |
EW: ♣4/3 ♦3 ♥5/4 ♠4/3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 4.00 0.00 2♥ W -3 ♣T 9-Bramlage-Lundgreen vs 7-Wilson-Wilson
130 3.00 1.00 2♣ S 4 ♦A 8-Shannon-Shannon vs 4-Cordon-Miller
110 2.00 2.00 2♣ S 3 ♥T 5-Greenlee-Hunt vs 2-Staab-Nielsen
90 1.00 3.00 2♣ S 2 ♠6 12-Hedberg-Peterson vs 1-Bujanovich-Smith
50 0.00 4.00 3N S -1 ♥7 6-Hintz-Woods vs 10-Zane-Wilson-Brackett
|
2 |
♠JT4
♥T876
♦KJ
♣KQ95
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
♠A762
♥2
♦A8743
♣T42
|
♠K9
♥KJ943
♦965
♣A73
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1NT ♣6 ♦4 ♥6 ♠6 |
EW: 1♦ ♣6 ♥6 ♠6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
PASS 3.00 1.00 Pass Out 5-Greenlee-Hunt vs 2-Staab-Nielsen
PASS 3.00 1.00 Pass Out 6-Hintz-Woods vs 10-Zane-Wilson-Brackett
PASS 3.00 1.00 Pass Out 8-Shannon-Shannon vs 4-Cordon-Miller
90 1.00 3.00 2♦ W 2 ♣K 12-Hedberg-Peterson vs 1-Bujanovich-Smith
200 0.00 4.00 3♠ N -2 ♦6 9-Bramlage-Lundgreen vs 7-Wilson-Wilson
|
3 |
♠QT3
♥A93
♦T853
♣A62
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
♠74
♥K8
♦AK642
♣QJ98
|
♠AK85
♥T7654
♦Q7
♣K4
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦3 ♥4 ♠5 NT5 |
EW: 2♣ 3/4♦ 3♥ 2♠ 2NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 3.50 0.50 3N W -2 ♠3 5-Greenlee-Hunt vs 2-Staab-Nielsen
200 3.50 0.50 4♥ E -2 ♠6 6-Hintz-Woods vs 10-Zane-Wilson-Brackett
600 1.50 2.50 3N W 3 ♦3 9-Bramlage-Lundgreen vs 7-Wilson-Wilson
600 1.50 2.50 3N W 3 ♦3 12-Hedberg-Peterson vs 1-Bujanovich-Smith
630 0.00 4.00 3N W 4 ♦3 8-Shannon-Shannon vs 4-Cordon-Miller
|
4 |
♠T2
♥J85
♦KJT7
♣AQ83
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
♠AK8654
♥AKQ
♦2
♣J75
|
♠Q3
♥T7642
♦AQ4
♣K94
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦5 ♥0 ♠0 NT0 |
EW: 3♣ 2♦ 6♥ 6♠ 6NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
650 4.00 0.00 7-Wilson-Wilson vs 10-Zane-Wilson-Brackett
680 1.50 2.50 4♠ W 6 ♦J 1-Bujanovich-Smith vs 8-Shannon-Shannon
680 1.50 2.50 4♠ W 6 ♦J 9-Bramlage-Lundgreen vs 5-Greenlee-Hunt
680 1.50 2.50 4♠ W 6 ♣2 12-Hedberg-Peterson vs 2-Staab-Nielsen
680 1.50 2.50 4♥ E 6 ♣T 11-Ainbinder-Barish vs 4-Cordon-Miller
|
5 |
♠T872
♥953
♦65
♣KT65
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
♠KJ53
♥T74
♦KJ42
♣J9
|
♠Q4
♥AQJ62
♦QT7
♣A42
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ ♦5 ♥4 ♠6 NT6 |
EW: 2♦ 2♥ 1♠ 1NT ♣5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
120 4.00 0.00 7-Wilson-Wilson vs 10-Zane-Wilson-Brackett
100 2.00 2.00 3N E -2 ♦3 1-Bujanovich-Smith vs 8-Shannon-Shannon
100 2.00 2.00 3N E -2 ♦3 9-Bramlage-Lundgreen vs 5-Greenlee-Hunt
100 2.00 2.00 3N E -2 ♣2 12-Hedberg-Peterson vs 2-Staab-Nielsen
140 0.00 4.00 2♥ E 3 ♠A 11-Ainbinder-Barish vs 4-Cordon-Miller
|
6 |
♠AT765
♥AK9
♦A7
♣J92
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
♠KJ4
♥T875
♦54
♣KT85
|
♠Q983
♥QJ6
♦JT9
♣743
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 5♦ 3/4♥ 3♠ 4NT |
EW: ♣3 ♦1 ♥3 ♠4 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
490 4.00 0.00 7-Wilson-Wilson vs 10-Zane-Wilson-Brackett
460 2.00 2.00 3N S 5 ♣5 9-Bramlage-Lundgreen vs 5-Greenlee-Hunt
460 2.00 2.00 3N N 5 ♠3 12-Hedberg-Peterson vs 2-Staab-Nielsen
460 2.00 2.00 3N N 5 ♦J 11-Ainbinder-Barish vs 4-Cordon-Miller
400 0.00 4.00 5♦ S 5 ♥7 1-Bujanovich-Smith vs 8-Shannon-Shannon
|
7 |
♠J32
♥AT
♦KQJ3
♣AK73
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
♠QT876
♥KJ532
♦A4
♣6
|
♠9
♥9764
♦T92
♣T9542
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3/4♣ 4/5♦ 2/3♠ 2/5NT ♥5 |
EW: 2♥ ♣3 ♦2 ♠4 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
660 4.00 0.00 4N S 5 ♥3 2-Staab-Nielsen vs 9-Bramlage-Lundgreen
630 3.00 1.00 3N N 4 ♠9 10-Zane-Wilson-Brackett vs 8-Shannon-Shannon
620 1.50 2.50 5♦ S 6 ♣6 7-Wilson-Wilson vs 4-Cordon-Miller
620 1.50 2.50 1-Bujanovich-Smith vs 6-Hintz-Woods
200 0.00 4.00 6N N -2 ♠9 11-Ainbinder-Barish vs 5-Greenlee-Hunt
|
8 |
♠T9
♥AKQJ2
♦QJ7653
♣-
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
♠AQ4
♥T75
♦T4
♣KJ873
|
♠KJ7
♥943
♦AK92
♣965
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 1♥ 1♠ ♣5 NT6 |
EW: 1♣ 1NT ♦5 ♥5 ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 4.00 0.00 4♥ N 4 ♦A 7-Wilson-Wilson vs 4-Cordon-Miller
140 3.00 1.00 2♥ N 3 ♠J 11-Ainbinder-Barish vs 5-Greenlee-Hunt
110 2.00 2.00 1-Bujanovich-Smith vs 6-Hintz-Woods
50 1.00 3.00 3♦ N -1 ♣9 10-Zane-Wilson-Brackett vs 8-Shannon-Shannon
150 0.00 4.00 4♥ N -3 ♣6 2-Staab-Nielsen vs 9-Bramlage-Lundgreen
|
9 |
♠AK32
♥J3
♦AT943
♣92
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
♠5
♥AT96
♦K75
♣AQ843
|
♠976
♥K8752
♦J8
♣T65
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1/2♦ 2♠ ♣4 ♥3 NT6 |
EW: 3♣ 4♥ 1NT ♦5 ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 4.00 0.00 7-Wilson-Wilson vs 4-Cordon-Miller
170 3.00 1.00 2♠ S 4 ♥J 11-Ainbinder-Barish vs 5-Greenlee-Hunt
110 2.00 2.00 2♠ S 2 ♠5 10-Zane-Wilson-Brackett vs 8-Shannon-Shannon
50 1.00 3.00 3♠ S -1 ♠5 2-Staab-Nielsen vs 9-Bramlage-Lundgreen
100 0.00 4.00 1-Bujanovich-Smith vs 6-Hintz-Woods
|
10 |
♠A942
♥6
♦AT962
♣JT4
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
♠KJ8753
♥KJT5
♦8
♣K6
|
♠Q6
♥Q832
♦KQ7
♣7532
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 4♦ ♥6 ♠5/6 NT6 |
EW: 1♥ 1♠ 1NT ♣3 ♦3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 4.00 0.00 3♠ W -2 ♥6 12-Hedberg-Peterson vs 4-Cordon-Miller
100 2.00 2.00 2♠ W -1 ♥K 2-Staab-Nielsen vs 7-Wilson-Wilson
100 2.00 2.00 2♠ W -1 ♥6 11-Ainbinder-Barish vs 6-Hintz-Woods
100 2.00 2.00 2♥ W -1 ♣J 10-Zane-Wilson-Brackett vs 9-Bramlage-Lundgreen
100 0.00 4.00 8-Shannon-Shannon vs 5-Greenlee-Hunt
|
11 |
♠842
♥KQT6
♦KQ97
♣86
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
♠A973
♥J7
♦43
♣AKJT2
|
♠QJT5
♥A92
♦T62
♣Q73
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 1♥ ♣3 ♠2 NT3 |
EW: 4♣ 5♠ 3NT ♦5 ♥5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 4.00 0.00 8-Shannon-Shannon vs 5-Greenlee-Hunt
170 3.00 1.00 2♠ E 4 ♦A 11-Ainbinder-Barish vs 6-Hintz-Woods
200 1.00 3.00 2♠ E 5 ♥7 10-Zane-Wilson-Brackett vs 9-Bramlage-Lundgreen
200 1.00 3.00 2♠ E 5 ♥3 12-Hedberg-Peterson vs 4-Cordon-Miller
200 1.00 3.00 2♠ E 5 ♦3 2-Staab-Nielsen vs 7-Wilson-Wilson
|
12 |
♠J6
♥K3
♦KJT92
♣K962
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
♠T52
♥AJ42
♦Q7654
♣5
|
♠A9
♥T765
♦83
♣AT843
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 1♦ 2♠ 2NT ♥6 |
EW: 1♥ ♣5 ♦6 ♠4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
600 4.00 0.00 3N N 3 ♣4 11-Ainbinder-Barish vs 6-Hintz-Woods
140 3.00 1.00 3♠ S 3 ♦3 2-Staab-Nielsen vs 7-Wilson-Wilson
100 2.00 2.00 4♠ S -1 ♣5 12-Hedberg-Peterson vs 4-Cordon-Miller
200 0.50 3.50 4♠ S -2 ♦8 10-Zane-Wilson-Brackett vs 9-Bramlage-Lundgreen
200 0.50 3.50 8-Shannon-Shannon vs 5-Greenlee-Hunt
|
13 |
♠Q54
♥QJT97
♦Q93
♣A6
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
♠K972
♥8432
♦2
♣QT92
|
♠AJT63
♥K6
♦KJ4
♣874
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 5♦ 3/2♥ 1NT ♠5 |
EW: 1♠ ♣6 ♦2/1 ♥4 NT6/5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 4.00 0.00 3♥ N 4 ♠A 12-Hedberg-Peterson vs 5-Greenlee-Hunt
150 3.00 1.00 4-Cordon-Miller vs 2-Staab-Nielsen
130 2.00 2.00 3♦ S 4 ♠K 7-Wilson-Wilson vs 11-Ainbinder-Barish
100 1.00 3.00 3♠ E -1 ♦A 9-Bramlage-Lundgreen vs 6-Hintz-Woods
100 0.00 4.00 4♥ N -1 ♣8 1-Bujanovich-Smith vs 10-Zane-Wilson-Brackett
|
14 |
♠KJT5
♥KJ8
♦52
♣K732
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
♠Q8763
♥75
♦QJ74
♣T9
|
♠9
♥AQ962
♦A983
♣865
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4/3♣ 2♠ 3NT ♦5 ♥6 |
EW: 2♦ ♣3 ♥6 ♠5 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
210 4.00 0.00 2N N 5 ♠9 7-Wilson-Wilson vs 11-Ainbinder-Barish
180 3.00 1.00 1N S 4 ♠6 12-Hedberg-Peterson vs 5-Greenlee-Hunt
110 2.00 2.00 2♠ N 2 ♠9 9-Bramlage-Lundgreen vs 6-Hintz-Woods
50 1.00 3.00 4♠ N -1 ♠9 1-Bujanovich-Smith vs 10-Zane-Wilson-Brackett
110 0.00 4.00 4-Cordon-Miller vs 2-Staab-Nielsen
|
15 |
♠JT98
♥AT87
♦A4
♣543
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
♠Q
♥KQJ
♦T765
♣AKT76
|
♠76542
♥962
♦J3
♣J82
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 2♥ 2♠ 2NT ♣5 |
EW: 1♣ ♦4 ♥4 ♠4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 4.00 0.00 2♦ S 3 ♠Q 1-Bujanovich-Smith vs 10-Zane-Wilson-Brackett
100 1.50 2.50 2♦ S -1 ♣A 7-Wilson-Wilson vs 11-Ainbinder-Barish
100 1.50 2.50 2♦ S -1 ♣A 9-Bramlage-Lundgreen vs 6-Hintz-Woods
100 1.50 2.50 2♦ S -1 ♣A 12-Hedberg-Peterson vs 5-Greenlee-Hunt
100 1.50 2.50 4-Cordon-Miller vs 2-Staab-Nielsen
|
16 |
♠QJ643
♥QJ93
♦Q6
♣T9
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
♠AK92
♥T8654
♦K32
♣5
|
♠T75
♥K72
♦AT
♣J8732
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 2♦ 2NT ♥5 ♠6 |
EW: 2♥ 1♠ ♣6/5 ♦5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
430 4.00 0.00 3N N 4 ♣2 8-Shannon-Shannon vs 11-Ainbinder-Barish
400 3.00 1.00 3N S 3 ♥5 2-Staab-Nielsen vs 10-Zane-Wilson-Brackett
130 2.00 2.00 3♦ S 4 ♣3 1-Bujanovich-Smith vs 7-Wilson-Wilson
110 1.00 3.00 3♣ S 3 ♠A 4-Cordon-Miller vs 9-Bramlage-Lundgreen
100 0.00 4.00 3♦ S -2 ♠A 12-Hedberg-Peterson vs 6-Hintz-Woods
|
17 |
♠A83
♥J82
♦KT9762
♣9
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
♠52
♥T64
♦Q8
♣KJT865
|
♠J6
♥AK973
♦A5
♣Q432
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♦ 4♠ 1NT ♣5 ♥5 |
EW: 2♣ 2♥ ♦3 ♠3 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 4.00 0.00 4♠ S 4 ♥T 8-Shannon-Shannon vs 11-Ainbinder-Barish
170 2.00 2.00 3♠ N 4 ♦3 1-Bujanovich-Smith vs 7-Wilson-Wilson
170 2.00 2.00 2♠ S 4 ♥T 2-Staab-Nielsen vs 10-Zane-Wilson-Brackett
170 2.00 2.00 2♠ N 4 ♥6 4-Cordon-Miller vs 9-Bramlage-Lundgreen
140 0.00 4.00 3♠ S 3 ♥4 12-Hedberg-Peterson vs 6-Hintz-Woods
|
18 |
♠84
♥J8765
♦AKT4
♣K7
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
♠AKJ63
♥4
♦Q752
♣AT3
|
♠9
♥AT2
♦863
♣QJ9842
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♥ ♣2 ♦5 ♠6 NT4 |
EW: 3♣ -/2♦ 1♠ ♦6/8 ♥4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 3.50 0.50 1♠ W -1 ♦A 2-Staab-Nielsen vs 10-Zane-Wilson-Brackett
50 3.50 0.50 4♣ E -1 ♣T 1-Bujanovich-Smith vs 7-Wilson-Wilson
130 1.50 2.50 4♣ E 4 ♥K 8-Shannon-Shannon vs 11-Ainbinder-Barish
130 1.50 2.50 2♣ E 4 ♥K 12-Hedberg-Peterson vs 6-Hintz-Woods
140 0.00 4.00 2♠ W 3 ♦A 4-Cordon-Miller vs 9-Bramlage-Lundgreen
|
19 |
♠AQ984
♥Q974
♦QJ
♣KT
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
♠JT52
♥KT
♦93
♣A7632
|
♠K
♥63
♦AKT8742
♣985
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♥ 2♠ ♣4 ♦4 NT4 |
EW: 3♣ 3♦ 2NT ♥5 ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
300 4.00 0.00 3♥ E -3 ♠7 11-Ainbinder-Barish vs 9-Bramlage-Lundgreen
110 3.00 1.00 2♠ N 2 ♦A 5-Greenlee-Hunt vs 1-Bujanovich-Smith
150 1.50 2.50 3♠ N -3 ♦A 6-Hintz-Woods vs 4-Cordon-Miller
150 1.50 2.50 3♠ N -3 ♦2 2-Staab-Nielsen vs 8-Shannon-Shannon
200 0.00 4.00 3♠ N -4 ♦A 12-Hedberg-Peterson vs 7-Wilson-Wilson
|
20 |
♠AQT874
♥964
♦T4
♣95
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
♠95
♥QT872
♦K6
♣A864
|
♠6
♥AK
♦AJ832
♣KJT32
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣0 ♦2 ♥0 ♠6 NT1 |
EW: 6♣ 4♦ 5♥ 1♠ 1NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
130 4.00 0.00 3♦ E 4 ♠K 6-Hintz-Woods vs 4-Cordon-Miller
170 1.50 2.50 4♣ E 6 ♠K 2-Staab-Nielsen vs 8-Shannon-Shannon
170 1.50 2.50 4♣ E 6 ♠K 5-Greenlee-Hunt vs 1-Bujanovich-Smith
170 1.50 2.50 4♣ E 6 ♠K 11-Ainbinder-Barish vs 9-Bramlage-Lundgreen
170 1.50 2.50 3♣ E 6 ♠2 12-Hedberg-Peterson vs 7-Wilson-Wilson
|
21 |
♠A873
♥AKT
♦J752
♣72
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
♠Q954
♥976
♦AQ3
♣QT3
|
♠KT
♥J83
♦984
♣AK865
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ ♣4 ♥6 ♠6 NT5 |
EW: 3♣ 1♥ 1♠ 2NT ♦6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.50 0.50 1N S -1 ♠4 6-Hintz-Woods vs 4-Cordon-Miller
100 3.50 0.50 1N S -1 ♠4 11-Ainbinder-Barish vs 9-Bramlage-Lundgreen
150 1.50 2.50 2N W 3 ♠3 5-Greenlee-Hunt vs 1-Bujanovich-Smith
150 1.50 2.50 2N W 3 ♠3 12-Hedberg-Peterson vs 7-Wilson-Wilson
180 0.00 4.00 2N W 4 ♠3 2-Staab-Nielsen vs 8-Shannon-Shannon
|
22 |
♠KJ973
♥A98754
♦-
♣53
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
♠AQ84
♥62
♦KJ973
♣T2
|
♠T652
♥KQT3
♦54
♣Q76
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 3♦ 3♥ 1♠ 2NT |
EW: ♣3 ♦4 ♥4 ♠6 NT5/4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
130 3.00 1.00 4♣ S 4 ♣2 7-Wilson-Wilson vs 5-Greenlee-Hunt
130 3.00 1.00 3♣ S 4 ♥6 11-Ainbinder-Barish vs 1-Bujanovich-Smith
130 3.00 1.00 3♣ S 4 ♥3 12-Hedberg-Peterson vs 8-Shannon-Shannon
50 1.00 3.00 4♥ N -1 ♦6 6-Hintz-Woods vs 2-Staab-Nielsen
100 0.00 4.00 4♥ N -2 ♦5 10-Zane-Wilson-Brackett vs 4-Cordon-Miller
|
23 |
♠AQ2
♥QT4
♦KQT65
♣K9
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
♠95
♥A762
♦93
♣AJ875
|
♠K76
♥K3
♦A8742
♣642
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ 1♠ ♣4 ♦5 NT6 |
EW: 3♣ 1♦ ♥6 ♠6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 4.00 0.00 2♠ N 2 ♦A 6-Hintz-Woods vs 2-Staab-Nielsen
90 3.00 1.00 1N N 1 ♦4 10-Zane-Wilson-Brackett vs 4-Cordon-Miller
100 1.00 3.00 2N N -1 ♣6 11-Ainbinder-Barish vs 1-Bujanovich-Smith
100 1.00 3.00 2♠ S -1 ♦9 12-Hedberg-Peterson vs 8-Shannon-Shannon
100 1.00 3.00 2♠ S -1 ♣A 7-Wilson-Wilson vs 5-Greenlee-Hunt
|
24 |
♠AKQT84
♥5
♦K
♣KQ542
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
♠76
♥K876
♦T7
♣J9876
|
♠J95
♥JT94
♦J986
♣AT
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 4♦ 2♥ 5♠ 3/4NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦2 ♥5 ♠1 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
480 4.00 0.00 4♠ N 6 ♣A 7-Wilson-Wilson vs 5-Greenlee-Hunt
450 3.00 1.00 4♠ N 5 ♥J 11-Ainbinder-Barish vs 1-Bujanovich-Smith
430 2.00 2.00 3N S 4 ♣7 12-Hedberg-Peterson vs 8-Shannon-Shannon
230 1.00 3.00 3♠ N 6 ♣A 10-Zane-Wilson-Brackett vs 4-Cordon-Miller
50 0.00 4.00 6♠ N -1 ♣A 6-Hintz-Woods vs 2-Staab-Nielsen
|
25 |
♠KT74
♥J82
♦AKQ
♣J95
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
♠J865
♥64
♦98
♣T8742
|
♠A92
♥AKQT95
♦32
♣Q6
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 4♦ 2♠ ♥6 NT6 |
EW: 1♥ ♣6 ♦3 ♠5 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 4.00 0.00 3♥ E -2 ♣A 4-Cordon-Miller vs 1-Bujanovich-Smith
130 2.50 1.50 3♦ S 4 ♥6 2-Staab-Nielsen vs 11-Ainbinder-Barish
130 2.50 1.50 12-Hedberg-Peterson vs 9-Bramlage-Lundgreen
50 1.00 3.00 4♦ S -1 ♥6 5-Greenlee-Hunt vs 10-Zane-Wilson-Brackett
500 0.00 4.00 3N* N -3 ♥A 8-Shannon-Shannon vs 6-Hintz-Woods
|
26 |
♠6
♥85
♦98652
♣QJ985
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
♠AK53
♥QT76
♦AJ3
♣32
|
♠9872
♥AK43
♦QT7
♣AK
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6 ♦3 ♥1 ♠1 NT1 |
EW: 1♣ 4♦ 6♥ 6♠ 6NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
650 3.50 0.50 4♥ E 5 ♣T 8-Shannon-Shannon vs 6-Hintz-Woods
650 3.50 0.50 12-Hedberg-Peterson vs 9-Bramlage-Lundgreen
660 2.00 2.00 3N E 5 ♠4 5-Greenlee-Hunt vs 10-Zane-Wilson-Brackett
680 0.50 3.50 4♥ E 6 ♠Q 2-Staab-Nielsen vs 11-Ainbinder-Barish
680 0.50 3.50 4♥ E 6 ♠Q 4-Cordon-Miller vs 1-Bujanovich-Smith
|
27 |
♠K853
♥K94
♦AK6
♣654
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
♠A72
♥6
♦Q98432
♣KQ3
|
♠QJ96
♥AQ532
♦T
♣J87
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6 ♦5 ♥5 ♠4 NT6 |
EW: 2♦ 2♥ 2/3♠ 1NT ♣6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 4.00 0.00 12-Hedberg-Peterson vs 9-Bramlage-Lundgreen
110 2.50 1.50 2♠ E 2 ♣A 5-Greenlee-Hunt vs 10-Zane-Wilson-Brackett
110 2.50 1.50 3♦ W 3 ♣6 4-Cordon-Miller vs 1-Bujanovich-Smith
140 1.00 3.00 2♠ E 3 ♥J 8-Shannon-Shannon vs 6-Hintz-Woods
150 0.00 4.00 2N S -3 ♦2 2-Staab-Nielsen vs 11-Ainbinder-Barish
|