1 |
♠QJ53
♥6
♦J9843
♣832
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
♠AT97
♥K943
♦T6
♣J96
|
♠642
♥AQJ72
♦AQ5
♣A4
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ ♣6 ♥4 ♠5 NT4 |
EW: 3♥ 2♠ 3NT ♣6 ♦5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 4.00 0.00 4♥ E -1 ♣K 9-Greenlee-Kittock vs 2-Bujanovich-Staab
140 3.00 1.00 3♥ E 3 ♣K 10-Wilson-Wilson vs 8-Besteman-Miller
170 2.00 2.00 3♥ E 4 ♣K 6-Hedberg-Peterson vs 5-Ainbinder-Barish
420 0.50 3.50 4♥ E 4 ♥5 4-Bramlage-Kittlaus vs 1-Cordon-Woods
420 0.50 3.50 4♥ E 4 ♥5 7-Brackett-Nielsen vs 3-Hintz-Conley
|
2 |
♠32
♥K62
♦K974
♣J874
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
♠AQ
♥Q753
♦J3
♣AQ632
|
♠KJT976
♥AT94
♦A2
♣9
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣2 ♦6 ♥1 ♠1 NT1 |
EW: 4♣ 1♦ 6♥ 6♠ 5NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
450 3.50 0.50 4♠ E 5 ♥J 4-Bramlage-Kittlaus vs 1-Cordon-Woods
450 3.50 0.50 4♠ E 5 ♦T 7-Brackett-Nielsen vs 3-Hintz-Conley
480 1.00 3.00 4♠ E 6 ♥J 6-Hedberg-Peterson vs 5-Ainbinder-Barish
480 1.00 3.00 4♠ E 6 ♥J 9-Greenlee-Kittock vs 2-Bujanovich-Staab
480 1.00 3.00 4♠ E 6 ♥J 10-Wilson-Wilson vs 8-Besteman-Miller
|
3 |
♠K7
♥J652
♦KQT
♣9843
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
♠Q952
♥K973
♦963
♣J6
|
♠JT8643
♥-
♦8752
♣KQ5
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 2♦ 4♥ 4NT ♠6 |
EW: 1♠ ♣3 ♦4 ♥3 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 3.00 1.00 4♥ S 4 ♣J 4-Bramlage-Kittlaus vs 1-Cordon-Woods
420 3.00 1.00 4♥ S 4 ♣J 7-Brackett-Nielsen vs 3-Hintz-Conley
420 3.00 1.00 4♥ S 4 ♣J 10-Wilson-Wilson vs 8-Besteman-Miller
150 0.50 3.50 6♥ S -3 ♣J 6-Hedberg-Peterson vs 5-Ainbinder-Barish
150 0.50 3.50 6♥ S -3 ♣J 9-Greenlee-Kittock vs 2-Bujanovich-Staab
|
4 |
♠62
♥K874
♦J
♣JT8763
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
♠KJT73
♥T6
♦K865
♣K9
|
♠A94
♥J52
♦AQT73
♣A5
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 1♥ ♦1 ♠1 NT1 |
EW: 5♦ 5♠ 3NT ♣5 ♥5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.00 0.00 4♠ E -1 ♣2 8-Besteman-Miller vs 4-Bramlage-Kittlaus
620 3.00 1.00 4♠ E 4 ♥A 5-Ainbinder-Barish vs 2-Bujanovich-Staab
680 1.00 3.00 4♠ E 6 ♦9 7-Brackett-Nielsen vs 6-Hedberg-Peterson
680 1.00 3.00 4♠ E 6 ♦4 10-Wilson-Wilson vs 9-Greenlee-Kittock
680 1.00 3.00 4♠ E 6 ♣2 1-Cordon-Woods vs 3-Hintz-Conley
|
5 |
♠AQ2
♥A986432
♦K64
♣-
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
♠765
♥5
♦873
♣QT6542
|
♠984
♥QJT7
♦QJ9
♣983
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 6♦ 5♥ 6♠ 5NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦1 ♥2 ♠0/1 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
660 4.00 0.00 3N S 5 ♣5 7-Brackett-Nielsen vs 6-Hedberg-Peterson
100 1.50 2.50 6N S -1 ♣6 1-Cordon-Woods vs 3-Hintz-Conley
100 1.50 2.50 6N S -1 ♣6 10-Wilson-Wilson vs 9-Greenlee-Kittock
100 1.50 2.50 6N S -1 ♣5 8-Besteman-Miller vs 4-Bramlage-Kittlaus
100 1.50 2.50 6♥ N -1 ♠9 5-Ainbinder-Barish vs 2-Bujanovich-Staab
|
6 |
♠4
♥K5
♦KT32
♣KJT642
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
♠J2
♥QJT973
♦65
♣Q83
|
♠AKQT83
♥4
♦AQ97
♣A7
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6 ♦4 ♥3 ♠3/2 NT4 |
EW: -/1♦ 3♥ 4♠ 3NT ♣5/6 ♦6/7 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 4.00 0.00 3♠ E 4 ♣9 8-Besteman-Miller vs 4-Bramlage-Kittlaus
620 2.50 1.50 4♠ E 4 ♣9 1-Cordon-Woods vs 3-Hintz-Conley
620 2.50 1.50 4♠ E 4 ♣9 10-Wilson-Wilson vs 9-Greenlee-Kittock
650 0.50 3.50 4♠ E 5 ♣9 5-Ainbinder-Barish vs 2-Bujanovich-Staab
650 0.50 3.50 4♠ E 5 ♣9 7-Brackett-Nielsen vs 6-Hedberg-Peterson
|
7 |
♠A875
♥Q7
♦985
♣AJ74
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
♠QJT6
♥AT98
♦KJ
♣Q95
|
♠K32
♥K543
♦T76
♣T82
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 3♦ 1♠ 1NT ♥6 |
EW: 1♥ ♣4 ♦4 ♠6 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 3.50 0.50 3♥ E -2 ♦A 6-Hedberg-Peterson vs 3-Hintz-Conley
200 3.50 0.50 2♥ E -2 ♠9 10-Wilson-Wilson vs 1-Cordon-Woods
100 2.00 2.00 2♥ E -1 ♠9 8-Besteman-Miller vs 7-Brackett-Nielsen
110 0.50 3.50 2♥ E 2 ♠9 2-Bujanovich-Staab vs 4-Bramlage-Kittlaus
110 0.50 3.50 2♥ E 2 ♠9 9-Greenlee-Kittock vs 5-Ainbinder-Barish
|
8 |
♠T7
♥763
♦JT652
♣964
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
♠K853
♥J98
♦A83
♣Q85
|
♠AQ42
♥KT5
♦K
♣AJT73
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ ♣3 ♥5 ♠2 NT3 |
EW: 4♣ 2♥ 5/4♠ 4/3NT ♦6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
130 3.50 0.50 3♣ E 4 ♦4 2-Bujanovich-Staab vs 4-Bramlage-Kittlaus
130 3.50 0.50 3♣ E 4 ♦4 10-Wilson-Wilson vs 1-Cordon-Woods
200 1.50 2.50 3♠ W 5 ♦J 9-Greenlee-Kittock vs 5-Ainbinder-Barish
200 1.50 2.50 2♠ W 5 ♦J 8-Besteman-Miller vs 7-Brackett-Nielsen
210 0.00 4.00 1N W 5 ♦5 6-Hedberg-Peterson vs 3-Hintz-Conley
|
9 |
♠A542
♥Q3
♦KJT4
♣AQ4
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
♠T8
♥T2
♦A82
♣J86532
|
♠J
♥AK9876
♦95
♣KT97
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ 4♠ 2/1NT ♣4/3 ♥5 |
EW: 3♣ 2♥ ♦3 ♠3 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 2.00 2.00 4♠ N 4 ♥A 2-Bujanovich-Staab vs 4-Bramlage-Kittlaus
420 2.00 2.00 4♠ N 4 ♥A 6-Hedberg-Peterson vs 3-Hintz-Conley
420 2.00 2.00 4♠ N 4 ♥A 8-Besteman-Miller vs 7-Brackett-Nielsen
420 2.00 2.00 4♠ N 4 ♥A 9-Greenlee-Kittock vs 5-Ainbinder-Barish
420 2.00 2.00 4♠ N 4 ♥A 10-Wilson-Wilson vs 1-Cordon-Woods
|
10 |
♠2
♥AQT4
♦QJ9
♣AT543
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
♠T853
♥9
♦K85432
♣K8
|
♠AQ9764
♥62
♦A
♣QJ72
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 3♥ 2NT ♦4 ♠3 |
EW: 2♦ 4♠ ♣6 ♥4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.00 0.00 4♥ S -1 ♠T 10-Wilson-Wilson vs 2-Bujanovich-Staab
170 3.00 1.00 3♠ E 4 ♣9 3-Hintz-Conley vs 5-Ainbinder-Barish
620 1.50 2.50 4♠ E 4 ♥7 9-Greenlee-Kittock vs 8-Besteman-Miller
620 1.50 2.50 4♠ E 4 ♣9 7-Brackett-Nielsen vs 4-Bramlage-Kittlaus
650 0.00 4.00 4♠ E 5 ♣9 1-Cordon-Woods vs 6-Hedberg-Peterson
|
11 |
♠K53
♥T
♦JT9854
♣532
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
♠T76
♥AK743
♦AK2
♣A4
|
♠Q8
♥9652
♦63
♣KQ986
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ ♣3 ♥2 ♠6 NT4 |
EW: 4♣ 4♥ 1♠ 2NT ♦6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 3.50 0.50 3♥ W 4 ♠3 3-Hintz-Conley vs 5-Ainbinder-Barish
170 3.50 0.50 2♥ W 4 ♠K 1-Cordon-Woods vs 6-Hedberg-Peterson
420 2.00 2.00 4♥ W 4 ♠K 7-Brackett-Nielsen vs 4-Bramlage-Kittlaus
450 1.00 3.00 4♥ W 5 ♦J 9-Greenlee-Kittock vs 8-Besteman-Miller
480 0.00 4.00 4♥ W 6 ♦J 10-Wilson-Wilson vs 2-Bujanovich-Staab
|
12 |
♠AQ7
♥T632
♦K4
♣AK86
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
♠K5
♥85
♦Q953
♣QJ754
|
♠32
♥QJ9
♦JT62
♣T932
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 4♦ 6♥ 7♠ 6NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦3 ♥1 ♠0 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
1460 4.00 0.00 6♠ N 7 ♦2 9-Greenlee-Kittock vs 8-Besteman-Miller
1430 3.00 1.00 6♥ N 6 ♦J 10-Wilson-Wilson vs 2-Bujanovich-Staab
710 2.00 2.00 5♠ N 7 ♥Q 1-Cordon-Woods vs 6-Hedberg-Peterson
680 0.50 3.50 5♠ N 6 ♠2 3-Hintz-Conley vs 5-Ainbinder-Barish
680 0.50 3.50 4♠ N 6 ♦J 7-Brackett-Nielsen vs 4-Bramlage-Kittlaus
|
13 |
♠AKT85
♥T32
♦KQ2
♣AJ
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
♠Q9
♥7
♦T874
♣Q76432
|
♠3
♥KQJ65
♦AJ96
♣985
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2/1♥ 4♠ 3NT ♣5 ♦5 |
EW: 1♣ 2♦ ♥5 ♠3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
620 2.50 1.50 4♠ N 4 ♥K 1-Cordon-Woods vs 9-Greenlee-Kittock
620 2.50 1.50 4♠ N 4 ♥K 4-Bramlage-Kittlaus vs 6-Hedberg-Peterson
620 2.50 1.50 4♠ N 4 ♥K 8-Besteman-Miller vs 5-Ainbinder-Barish
620 2.50 1.50 4♠ N 4 ♥K 10-Wilson-Wilson vs 3-Hintz-Conley
170 0.00 4.00 3♠ N 4 ♦A 2-Bujanovich-Staab vs 7-Brackett-Nielsen
|
14 |
♠AQ75
♥852
♦Q653
♣82
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
♠JT
♥94
♦KJ842
♣KT65
|
♠K9632
♥AK6
♦9
♣AQ94
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣2 ♦4 ♥6 ♠3 NT4 |
EW: 5♣ 3♦ 1♥ 4♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 4.00 0.00 3N E -3 ♥Q 10-Wilson-Wilson vs 3-Hintz-Conley
90 3.00 1.00 2♣ E 2 ♥Q 2-Bujanovich-Staab vs 7-Brackett-Nielsen
110 2.00 2.00 2♣ E 3 ♥Q 1-Cordon-Woods vs 9-Greenlee-Kittock
150 1.00 3.00 2♣ E 5 ♥Q 8-Besteman-Miller vs 5-Ainbinder-Barish
400 0.00 4.00 3N W 3 ♠5 4-Bramlage-Kittlaus vs 6-Hedberg-Peterson
|
15 |
♠KJ84
♥QT53
♦96
♣AJ4
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
♠QT972
♥972
♦874
♣82
|
♠65
♥K64
♦K52
♣K9765
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 6♦ 7♥ 5♠ 7NT |
EW: ♣2 ♦1/0 ♥0 ♠2 NT0 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
690 4.00 0.00 3N S 6 ♠T 2-Bujanovich-Staab vs 7-Brackett-Nielsen
660 1.50 2.50 3N S 5 ♠T 1-Cordon-Woods vs 9-Greenlee-Kittock
660 1.50 2.50 3N S 5 ♠9 8-Besteman-Miller vs 5-Ainbinder-Barish
660 1.50 2.50 3N S 5 ♠7 4-Bramlage-Kittlaus vs 6-Hedberg-Peterson
660 1.50 2.50 3N S 5 ♠7 10-Wilson-Wilson vs 3-Hintz-Conley
|
16 |
♠AQ65
♥K72
♦J8764
♣8
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
♠T72
♥A965
♦A2
♣AQ96
|
♠K83
♥8
♦KQT93
♣KJT7
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣1 ♦3 ♥6 ♠5 NT3 |
EW: 6♣ 4♦ 1♠ 4NT ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 3.00 1.00 2♦ E 3 ♠4 10-Wilson-Wilson vs 4-Bramlage-Kittlaus
110 3.00 1.00 2♦ E 3 ♥Q 3-Hintz-Conley vs 8-Besteman-Miller
110 3.00 1.00 3♣ W 3 ♦4 2-Bujanovich-Staab vs 1-Cordon-Woods
180 1.00 3.00 1N E 4 ♥Q 9-Greenlee-Kittock vs 6-Hedberg-Peterson
600 0.00 4.00 3N W 3 ♦3 5-Ainbinder-Barish vs 7-Brackett-Nielsen
|
17 |
♠K
♥QT2
♦KJ92
♣AKJ63
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
♠QT52
♥K643
♦A4
♣984
|
♠AJ987
♥AJ98
♦T5
♣72
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 3♦ ♥2 ♠3 NT3 |
EW: 5♥ 4♠ 2NT ♣4 ♦4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 4.00 0.00 4♦ N 5 ♠A 10-Wilson-Wilson vs 4-Bramlage-Kittlaus
50 2.00 2.00 1N N -1 ♠8 9-Greenlee-Kittock vs 6-Hedberg-Peterson
50 2.00 2.00 4♦ N -1 ♠A 3-Hintz-Conley vs 8-Besteman-Miller
50 2.00 2.00 4♣ N -1 ♠A 2-Bujanovich-Staab vs 1-Cordon-Woods
170 0.00 4.00 3♠ E 4 ♦Q 5-Ainbinder-Barish vs 7-Brackett-Nielsen
|
18 |
♠A8
♥52
♦A643
♣QJT97
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
♠Q97
♥AQT9
♦JT75
♣63
|
♠4
♥KJ8763
♦KQ9
♣K54
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 1♦ 5♠ 1NT ♥4 |
EW: 3♥ ♣3/2 ♦6 ♠0/2 NT0/5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
650 3.50 0.50 4♠ S 5 ♥A 2-Bujanovich-Staab vs 1-Cordon-Woods
650 3.50 0.50 4♠ S 5 ♥A 9-Greenlee-Kittock vs 6-Hedberg-Peterson
620 2.00 2.00 4♠ S 4 ♥A 3-Hintz-Conley vs 8-Besteman-Miller
300 1.00 3.00 5♥* E -2 ♦8 5-Ainbinder-Barish vs 7-Brackett-Nielsen
50 0.00 4.00 4♥ E -1 ♦8 10-Wilson-Wilson vs 4-Bramlage-Kittlaus
|
19 |
♠8432
♥QT8
♦AJ6
♣KQ9
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
♠AKQ9
♥A654
♦Q87
♣72
|
♠-
♥KJ972
♦K95432
♣AT
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ ♦1 ♥1 ♠6 NT1 |
EW: 5♦ 5♥ 3NT ♣6 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.00 0.00 6♥ W -1 ♣K 4-Bramlage-Kittlaus vs 9-Greenlee-Kittock
620 2.00 2.00 4♥ W 4 ♣K 6-Hedberg-Peterson vs 8-Besteman-Miller
620 2.00 2.00 4♥ E 4 ♠J 1-Cordon-Woods vs 7-Brackett-Nielsen
620 2.00 2.00 4♥ E 4 ♦T 3-Hintz-Conley vs 2-Bujanovich-Staab
650 0.00 4.00 4♥ E 5 ♠J 10-Wilson-Wilson vs 5-Ainbinder-Barish
|
20 |
♠K74
♥A87
♦T84
♣9732
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
♠653
♥KQJ4
♦A96
♣AJ6
|
♠J9
♥2
♦KJ75
♣KQT854
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♥ 2♠ ♣3 ♦4 NT5 |
EW: 4♣ 2/1♦ 1NT ♥5 ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 3.00 1.00 3N W -2 ♠4 6-Hedberg-Peterson vs 8-Besteman-Miller
200 3.00 1.00 5♣ W -2 ♠4 1-Cordon-Woods vs 7-Brackett-Nielsen
200 3.00 1.00 5♣ W -2 ♦8 10-Wilson-Wilson vs 5-Ainbinder-Barish
600 0.50 3.50 3N W 3 ♠4 3-Hintz-Conley vs 2-Bujanovich-Staab
600 0.50 3.50 3N W 3 ♣2 4-Bramlage-Kittlaus vs 9-Greenlee-Kittock
|
21 |
♠T82
♥T6432
♦AKJ82
♣-
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
♠63
♥AQ87
♦Q7
♣97632
|
♠Q754
♥95
♦954
♣QT85
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 5♦ 4♥ 5/6♠ 5NT |
EW: ♣5 ♦2 ♥3 ♠1 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
690 4.00 0.00 3N S 6 ♣9 1-Cordon-Woods vs 7-Brackett-Nielsen
660 3.00 1.00 3N S 5 ♣3 6-Hedberg-Peterson vs 8-Besteman-Miller
620 1.50 2.50 4♥ S 4 ♠6 3-Hintz-Conley vs 2-Bujanovich-Staab
620 1.50 2.50 4♥ S 4 ♣3 4-Bramlage-Kittlaus vs 9-Greenlee-Kittock
100 0.00 4.00 5♥ S -1 ♠6 10-Wilson-Wilson vs 5-Ainbinder-Barish
|
22 |
♠T5
♥AKJ5
♦AT7543
♣Q
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
♠87632
♥-
♦KJ9
♣KJ963
|
♠Q4
♥Q98
♦86
♣A87542
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♦ 4♥ 1♠ 1NT ♣3 |
EW: 4♣ ♦3 ♥2 ♠6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
450 4.00 0.00 4♥ S 5 ♠3 10-Wilson-Wilson vs 6-Hedberg-Peterson
420 1.50 2.50 4♥ S 4 ♠8 2-Bujanovich-Staab vs 8-Besteman-Miller
420 1.50 2.50 4♥ S 4 ♠8 5-Ainbinder-Barish vs 1-Cordon-Woods
420 1.50 2.50 4♥ S 4 ♠8 7-Brackett-Nielsen vs 9-Greenlee-Kittock
420 1.50 2.50 4♥ S 4 ♣3 4-Bramlage-Kittlaus vs 3-Hintz-Conley
|
23 |
♠AT942
♥7
♦J653
♣873
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
♠3
♥KJT8
♦AT842
♣K42
|
♠KQJ8
♥653
♦Q
♣AJT65
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣2 ♦5 ♥4 ♠5 NT3 |
EW: 4♣ 2♦ 3♥ 2♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
180 4.00 0.00 2N W 4 ♠2 5-Ainbinder-Barish vs 1-Cordon-Woods
600 3.00 1.00 3N W 3 ♠4 10-Wilson-Wilson vs 6-Hedberg-Peterson
630 2.00 2.00 3N W 4 ♠4 2-Bujanovich-Staab vs 8-Besteman-Miller
660 0.50 3.50 3N W 5 ♥7 4-Bramlage-Kittlaus vs 3-Hintz-Conley
660 0.50 3.50 3N W 5 ♥7 7-Brackett-Nielsen vs 9-Greenlee-Kittock
|
24 |
♠Q873
♥KQ84
♦3
♣Q984
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
♠T94
♥AT97
♦KQJ4
♣AK
|
♠AK2
♥J65
♦T982
♣JT7
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ ♦4 ♥5 ♠5 NT5 |
EW: 3♦ 2♥ 1/2♠ 2NT ♣6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 3.50 0.50 3N W -1 ♠3 10-Wilson-Wilson vs 6-Hedberg-Peterson
50 3.50 0.50 3N W -1 ♣4 4-Bramlage-Kittlaus vs 3-Hintz-Conley
400 1.00 3.00 3N W 3 ♠2 5-Ainbinder-Barish vs 1-Cordon-Woods
400 1.00 3.00 3N W 3 ♥8 7-Brackett-Nielsen vs 9-Greenlee-Kittock
400 1.00 3.00 3N W 3 ♥4 2-Bujanovich-Staab vs 8-Besteman-Miller
|
25 |
♠96
♥K2
♦QJ32
♣AQJ76
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
♠852
♥T95
♦T954
♣T52
|
♠KJT74
♥QJ764
♦K87
♣-
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 7♣ 5♦ 2♥ 2♠ 5NT |
EW: ♣0 ♦2 ♥4 ♠4 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
940 3.00 1.00 6♣ N 7 ♥Q 3-Hintz-Conley vs 9-Greenlee-Kittock
940 3.00 1.00 6♣ N 7 ♥Q 6-Hedberg-Peterson vs 2-Bujanovich-Staab
940 3.00 1.00 6♣ N 7 ♥Q 10-Wilson-Wilson vs 7-Brackett-Nielsen
420 1.00 3.00 5♣ N 6 ♠7 5-Ainbinder-Barish vs 4-Bramlage-Kittlaus
50 0.00 4.00 6N S -1 ♠2 8-Besteman-Miller vs 1-Cordon-Woods
|
26 |
♠K85
♥Q8
♦KJ75
♣AK54
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
♠3
♥KT932
♦AT92
♣873
|
♠T972
♥A654
♦Q63
♣J2
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 1♦ 4♠ 1NT ♥4 |
EW: 3♥ ♣2 ♦6 ♠3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
620 4.00 0.00 4♠ N 4 ♣J 6-Hedberg-Peterson vs 2-Bujanovich-Staab
140 3.00 1.00 3♠ N 3 ♥4 5-Ainbinder-Barish vs 4-Bramlage-Kittlaus
100 1.00 3.00 4♠ N -1 ♥A 3-Hintz-Conley vs 9-Greenlee-Kittock
100 1.00 3.00 4♠ N -1 ♣J 10-Wilson-Wilson vs 7-Brackett-Nielsen
100 1.00 3.00 4♠ N -1 ♣2 8-Besteman-Miller vs 1-Cordon-Woods
|
27 |
♠6
♥AQ942
♦8643
♣Q54
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
♠J98
♥J3
♦AQ72
♣A872
|
♠Q5432
♥T
♦KJT
♣K963
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♥ 1NT ♣3 ♦5 ♠5 |
EW: 2♣ 2♦ 2♠ ♥4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
300 4.00 0.00 4♠* E -2 ♥6 10-Wilson-Wilson vs 7-Brackett-Nielsen
150 3.00 1.00 4♠ E -3 ♣J 5-Ainbinder-Barish vs 4-Bramlage-Kittlaus
50 1.00 3.00 4♥ S -1 ♠J 6-Hedberg-Peterson vs 2-Bujanovich-Staab
50 1.00 3.00 4♥ S -1 ♠J 8-Besteman-Miller vs 1-Cordon-Woods
50 1.00 3.00 4♥ S -1 ♠8 3-Hintz-Conley vs 9-Greenlee-Kittock
|