1 |
♠84
♥A53
♦8432
♣J643
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
♠AQ
♥KT74
♦AQ96
♣AK5
|
♠KJ9752
♥98
♦J75
♣Q9
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4 ♦0 ♥2/3 ♠0 NT0 |
EW: 3♣ 5/6♦ 4♥ 5/6♠ 5/6NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
150 2.00 0.00 4♦ W +1 6-Curley-Wilkinson vs 1-Echtenkamp-Echtenkamp
450 1.00 1.00 4♠ E +1 4-Hill-O Neal vs 2-Patchin-Purvis
480 0.00 2.00 4♠ E +2 5-Forslund-Forslund vs 3-Johnson-Peeples
|
2 |
♠K753
♥82
♦AQ53
♣Q43
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
♠AJ62
♥K9
♦J82
♣J976
|
♠Q
♥Q7543
♦KT97
♣A85
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♠ ♣5 ♦6 ♥6 NT6 |
EW: 1/2♣ 1♦ 1♥ 1NT ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
PASS 2.00 0.00 Pass Out 5-Forslund-Forslund vs 3-Johnson-Peeples
110 1.00 1.00 1♥ E +1 4-Hill-O Neal vs 2-Patchin-Purvis
200 0.00 2.00 3♠ S -2 6-Curley-Wilkinson vs 1-Echtenkamp-Echtenkamp
|
3 |
♠Q9865
♥JT54
♦A9
♣K7
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
♠KJ7
♥AQ2
♦K762
♣A42
|
♠AT4
♥K3
♦Q853
♣Q985
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦2 ♥4 ♠4 NT2 |
EW: 4♣ 5♦ 2♥ 3♠ 5NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
600 1.00 1.00 3N W 4-Hill-O Neal vs 2-Patchin-Purvis
600 1.00 1.00 3N W 6-Curley-Wilkinson vs 1-Echtenkamp-Echtenkamp
600 1.00 1.00 3N E 5-Forslund-Forslund vs 3-Johnson-Peeples
|
4 |
♠K8
♥KT764
♦A9762
♣3
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
♠AT976
♥3
♦J3
♣JT864
|
♠Q32
♥AJ9
♦QT54
♣K92
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 4♥ 1NT ♣5 ♠6 |
EW: 1♣ 1♠ ♦5 ♥3 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
140 2.00 0.00 2♥ N +1 4-Hill-O Neal vs 2-Patchin-Purvis
100 1.00 1.00 2♠ W -1 6-Curley-Wilkinson vs 1-Echtenkamp-Echtenkamp
100 0.00 2.00 4♥ N -1 5-Forslund-Forslund vs 3-Johnson-Peeples
|
5 |
♠KJT5
♥QT2
♦QJT
♣T64
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
♠Q42
♥753
♦K52
♣QJ82
|
♠A87
♥KJ84
♦A874
♣A5
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6 ♦6 ♥5 ♠6 NT6 |
EW: 1♣ 1♦ 1/2♥ 1NT ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 2.00 0.00 3N E -2 4-Hill-O Neal vs 2-Patchin-Purvis
50 1.00 1.00 1N E -1 6-Curley-Wilkinson vs 1-Echtenkamp-Echtenkamp
120 0.00 2.00 2N E 5-Forslund-Forslund vs 3-Johnson-Peeples
|
6 |
♠KJ52
♥96532
♦-
♣T973
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
♠AQ93
♥AQT74
♦J4
♣A8
|
♠86
♥J
♦T97653
♣KJ62
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5/6 ♦3 ♥5 ♠5/6 NT5 |
EW: 1/2♣ 2/4♦ 1/2♥ 1/2♠ 2/1NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
110 2.00 0.00 2♠ N 6-Curley-Wilkinson vs 2-Patchin-Purvis
100 1.00 1.00 2♠ W -1 4-Hill-O Neal vs 3-Johnson-Peeples
200 0.00 2.00 3♦ S -4 1-Echtenkamp-Echtenkamp vs 5-Forslund-Forslund
|
7 |
♠84
♥KJT87
♦K652
♣J6
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
♠QT93
♥A94
♦A
♣QT874
|
♠J2
♥Q65
♦QJ743
♣AK9
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦3 ♥6 ♠5 NT3 |
EW: 4♣ 2♦ 1♥ 2♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
600 2.00 0.00 3N E 1-Echtenkamp-Echtenkamp vs 5-Forslund-Forslund
630 0.50 1.50 3N W +1 6-Curley-Wilkinson vs 2-Patchin-Purvis
630 0.50 1.50 3N E +1 4-Hill-O Neal vs 3-Johnson-Peeples
|
8 |
♠AK6
♥Q8654
♦Q5
♣KJ4
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
♠Q5432
♥A2
♦T76
♣Q96
|
♠JT7
♥3
♦J432
♣A8753
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 2/4♦ 5♥ 1♠ 2/4NT |
EW: ♣6 ♦3 ♥2 ♠6 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
450 1.00 1.00 4♥ N +1 1-Echtenkamp-Echtenkamp vs 5-Forslund-Forslund
450 1.00 1.00 4♥ N +1 4-Hill-O Neal vs 3-Johnson-Peeples
450 1.00 1.00 4♥ N +1 6-Curley-Wilkinson vs 2-Patchin-Purvis
|
9 |
♠T763
♥6
♦AK63
♣AT96
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
♠Q
♥KT98
♦8752
♣K752
|
♠J982
♥AQJ7
♦JT9
♣J3
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 2♦ 1♥ 3♠ 2NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦5 ♥6 ♠3 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
200 2.00 0.00 3♠ N +2 1-Echtenkamp-Echtenkamp vs 5-Forslund-Forslund
PASS 0.50 1.50 Pass Out 4-Hill-O Neal vs 3-Johnson-Peeples
PASS 0.50 1.50 Pass Out 6-Curley-Wilkinson vs 2-Patchin-Purvis
|
10 |
♠J82
♥KT863
♦QJ9
♣Q2
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
♠KT76
♥J
♦876532
♣43
|
♠A93
♥A9752
♦T
♣J876
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 1♦ 3♥ 1♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣3 ♦5 ♥4 ♠6 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
600 1.50 0.50 3N S 1-Echtenkamp-Echtenkamp vs 5-Forslund-Forslund
600 1.50 0.50 3N S 4-Hill-O Neal vs 3-Johnson-Peeples
150 0.00 2.00 1N S +2 6-Curley-Wilkinson vs 2-Patchin-Purvis
|
11 |
♠A86
♥54
♦Q95
♣KT642
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
♠Q942
♥AQ9
♦732
♣875
|
♠73
♥KJ32
♦AKJT84
♣J
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 1♠ ♦3 ♥3 NT3 |
EW: 4♦ 2♥ ♣3 ♠5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
150 2.00 0.00 3N E -3 5-Forslund-Forslund vs 4-Hill-O Neal
130 1.00 1.00 3♣ N +1 6-Curley-Wilkinson vs 3-Johnson-Peeples
110 0.00 2.00 3♦ E 2-Patchin-Purvis vs 1-Echtenkamp-Echtenkamp
|
12 |
♠3
♥AT97632
♦K
♣KQJT
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
♠8642
♥KQJ4
♦Q94
♣73
|
♠AQJ5
♥5
♦J7532
♣865
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 2♦ 4♥ 2♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣0 ♦5 ♥2 ♠4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
600 2.00 0.00 3N N 5-Forslund-Forslund vs 4-Hill-O Neal
200 1.00 1.00 3N S -2 2-Patchin-Purvis vs 1-Echtenkamp-Echtenkamp
500 0.00 2.00 6♥* N -2 6-Curley-Wilkinson vs 3-Johnson-Peeples
|
13 |
♠-
♥T832
♦T975
♣AQ652
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
♠QJ86
♥AK5
♦AJ8
♣JT9
|
♠KT752
♥QJ97
♦32
♣87
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 3♦ ♥6 ♠4 NT6 |
EW: 1♥ 3♠ ♣4 ♦4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 2.00 0.00 4♣ N -1 6-Curley-Wilkinson vs 3-Johnson-Peeples
110 1.00 1.00 2♠ E 5-Forslund-Forslund vs 4-Hill-O Neal
170 0.00 2.00 2♠ W +2 2-Patchin-Purvis vs 1-Echtenkamp-Echtenkamp
|
14 |
♠T54
♥T96543
♦T43
♣A
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
♠A632
♥82
♦976
♣K762
|
♠K87
♥AK
♦KQ852
♣854
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 2♥ ♦4 ♠4 NT6 |
EW: 2♦ 1♠ ♣6 ♥5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
140 2.00 0.00 2♥ N +1 6-Curley-Wilkinson vs 3-Johnson-Peeples
50 1.00 1.00 2♦ E -1 5-Forslund-Forslund vs 4-Hill-O Neal
120 0.00 2.00 1N E +1 2-Patchin-Purvis vs 1-Echtenkamp-Echtenkamp
|
15 |
♠74
♥J98732
♦AQT6
♣8
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
♠J653
♥KT64
♦3
♣KQ32
|
♠T982
♥A
♦K985
♣AJ74
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 2♥ ♣4 ♠4 NT6 |
EW: 2♣ 2♠ 1NT ♦4 ♥5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 1.50 0.50 3♦ S -1 2-Patchin-Purvis vs 1-Echtenkamp-Echtenkamp
100 1.50 0.50 3♦ S -1 6-Curley-Wilkinson vs 3-Johnson-Peeples
110 0.00 2.00 2♠ E 5-Forslund-Forslund vs 4-Hill-O Neal
|
16 |
♠KT53
♥864
♦K52
♣985
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
♠J
♥A2
♦J7
♣AKJ76432
|
♠AQ92
♥Q93
♦AT63
♣QT
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣0 ♦4 ♥6 ♠6/5 NT0 |
EW: 6♣ 3/2♦ 1♥ 1/-♠ 6NT ♠7/6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 2.00 0.00 6N E -1 2-Patchin-Purvis vs 5-Forslund-Forslund
660 1.00 1.00 3N W +2 6-Curley-Wilkinson vs 4-Hill-O Neal
1370 0.00 2.00 6♣ W 3-Johnson-Peeples vs 1-Echtenkamp-Echtenkamp
|
17 |
♠97
♥9764
♦AKJ7
♣K32
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
♠T
♥KQJT2
♦Q95
♣Q985
|
♠K6432
♥5
♦632
♣AJT6
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ 3♠ 3/2NT ♣5 ♥6 |
EW: 1♣ ♦4 ♥6 ♠4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
110 2.00 0.00 3♦ N 6-Curley-Wilkinson vs 4-Hill-O Neal
50 1.00 1.00 1N N -1 2-Patchin-Purvis vs 5-Forslund-Forslund
100 0.00 2.00 2N N -2 3-Johnson-Peeples vs 1-Echtenkamp-Echtenkamp
|
18 |
♠J96
♥QT9543
♦A3
♣75
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
♠843
♥J7
♦J7652
♣JT4
|
♠KQ752
♥A6
♦QT4
♣A86
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 1♦ 4♥ 1♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣4/3 ♦6 ♥3 ♠6 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
200 2.00 0.00 3♥ N +2 6-Curley-Wilkinson vs 4-Hill-O Neal
100 1.00 1.00 2♠ E -2 3-Johnson-Peeples vs 1-Echtenkamp-Echtenkamp
380 0.00 2.00 1N* E +2 2-Patchin-Purvis vs 5-Forslund-Forslund
|
19 |
♠98642
♥9
♦K652
♣AJT
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
♠KT5
♥Q76
♦QT93
♣873
|
♠AJ7
♥T532
♦AJ4
♣K95
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ ♦5 ♥6 ♠6 NT5 |
EW: 2♦ 1♠ 2NT ♣5 ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 1.50 0.50 1N N -2 3-Johnson-Peeples vs 1-Echtenkamp-Echtenkamp
100 1.50 0.50 1N N -2 6-Curley-Wilkinson vs 4-Hill-O Neal
200 0.00 2.00 2N S -4 2-Patchin-Purvis vs 5-Forslund-Forslund
|
20 |
♠QJ8742
♥K84
♦9
♣983
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
♠K5
♥AJT96
♦J764
♣T7
|
♠A6
♥7532
♦KQ85
♣KQ6
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 3♠ ♦4 ♥4 NT4 |
EW: 3♦ 3♥ 1NT ♣5 ♠4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
140 2.00 0.00 2♠ N +1 2-Patchin-Purvis vs 5-Forslund-Forslund
100 1.00 1.00 4♥ W -1 6-Curley-Wilkinson vs 4-Hill-O Neal
170 0.00 2.00 3♥ W +1 3-Johnson-Peeples vs 1-Echtenkamp-Echtenkamp
|
21 |
♠742
♥Q
♦976532
♣875
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
♠K65
♥AKT4
♦KJ4
♣J62
|
♠AJT983
♥J32
♦AQ
♣QT
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦5 ♥3 ♠0 NT0 |
EW: 1♣ 2♦ 4♥ 5♠ 5NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
450 1.50 0.50 4♠ E +1 3-Johnson-Peeples vs 2-Patchin-Purvis
450 1.50 0.50 4♠ E +1 6-Curley-Wilkinson vs 5-Forslund-Forslund
520 0.00 2.00 3N W +4 1-Echtenkamp-Echtenkamp vs 4-Hill-O Neal
|
22 |
♠-
♥T973
♦5432
♣KJT32
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
♠AQ7532
♥J5
♦6
♣Q876
|
♠JT8
♥864
♦JT97
♣A54
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 5♦ 5♥ 2NT ♠6 |
EW: 1♠ ♣3 ♦2 ♥2 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
420 2.00 0.00 4♥ N 1-Echtenkamp-Echtenkamp vs 4-Hill-O Neal
150 1.00 1.00 3♦ S +2 3-Johnson-Peeples vs 2-Patchin-Purvis
50 0.00 2.00 3N S -1 6-Curley-Wilkinson vs 5-Forslund-Forslund
|
23 |
♠Q3
♥K97
♦Q9873
♣J53
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
♠A874
♥AT4
♦T52
♣Q94
|
♠J6
♥J6532
♦64
♣K876
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 4♦ -/1♥ 4♠ 3/4NT ♥6/7 |
EW: ♣6/5 ♦2 ♥6 ♠2 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
660 2.00 0.00 3N N +2 6-Curley-Wilkinson vs 5-Forslund-Forslund
630 1.00 1.00 3N S +1 1-Echtenkamp-Echtenkamp vs 4-Hill-O Neal
600 0.00 2.00 3N N 3-Johnson-Peeples vs 2-Patchin-Purvis
|
24 |
♠Q43
♥954
♦J843
♣AQ6
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
♠KJ762
♥QJ
♦A6
♣KJT3
|
♠A5
♥83
♦QT752
♣8754
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♥ 2NT ♣5 ♦6 ♠6 |
EW: 2♣ 1♦ 1♠ ♥4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
250 2.00 0.00 3N E -5 6-Curley-Wilkinson vs 5-Forslund-Forslund
200 1.00 1.00 3N E -4 1-Echtenkamp-Echtenkamp vs 4-Hill-O Neal
100 0.00 2.00 3♠ W -2 3-Johnson-Peeples vs 2-Patchin-Purvis
|
25 |
♠A87653
♥T7
♦A9
♣T54
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
♠2
♥854
♦KT52
♣A9872
|
♠KQ94
♥Q9632
♦83
♣J3
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 4♦ 1♥ 3♠ 4NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦3 ♥6 ♠4 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
420 1.50 0.50 4♠ S 1-Echtenkamp-Echtenkamp vs 4-Hill-O Neal
420 1.50 0.50 4♠ S 6-Curley-Wilkinson vs 5-Forslund-Forslund
50 0.00 2.00 4♠ N -1 3-Johnson-Peeples vs 2-Patchin-Purvis
|