This is a multi-session event. These masterpoint awards are not final. You will receive
at least the award shown. For example, if the award for your overall performance in a two
session event is greater than your current award, you will receive that final award instead
of (not in addition to) the award shown here.
1 |
♠AQJ95
♥76
♦KT85
♣83
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
♠T83
♥QT942
♦64
♣A65
|
♠64
♥AKJ
♦AQJ973
♣Q4
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 2♠ ♦3 ♥3 NT4 |
EW: 3♦ 3♥ 2NT ♣5 ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
50 5.50 2.50 4♥ W -1 2-Barbour-Barbour vs 3-Waters-Thayer
50 5.50 2.50 4♥ W -1 8-Harvey-Smith-Bourdon vs 6-Adams-Ammann
50 5.50 2.50 3♥ W -1 5-Patchin-Boone vs 9-Boyd-Poole
50 5.50 2.50 3♦ E -1 1-Hanset-Goodrich vs 1-Collins-Lockwood
50 5.50 2.50 3♦ E -1 6-Neitzel-Sahler vs 2-McLeod-McLeod
50 5.50 2.50 3♦ E -1 9-Richard-Schramm vs 8-Rutherford-Hines
100 2.00 6.00 4♠ N -2 3-Hutton-Hutton vs 5-Opheim-Opheim
110 1.00 7.00 3♦ E 7-Rise-Lachowicz vs 4-Lepp-Lepp
130 0.00 8.00 3♦ E +1 4-Anderson-Lee-Branscum vs 7-Larson-Larson
|
2 |
♠J5
♥AKT65
♦T54
♣T84
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
♠A983
♥QJ73
♦J8632
♣-
|
♠KQT74
♥98
♦Q
♣J7652
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 2♦ 2/3♥ 2NT ♠4 |
EW: 2♠ ♣2 ♦4/5 ♥3/4 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
600 8.00 0.00 3N S 7-Rise-Lachowicz vs 4-Lepp-Lepp
130 7.00 1.00 4♣ S 6-Neitzel-Sahler vs 2-McLeod-McLeod
110 5.00 3.00 3♣ S 4-Anderson-Lee-Branscum vs 7-Larson-Larson
110 5.00 3.00 3♣ S 5-Patchin-Boone vs 9-Boyd-Poole
110 5.00 3.00 3♣ S 8-Harvey-Smith-Bourdon vs 6-Adams-Ammann
50 3.00 5.00 3♠ E -1 1-Hanset-Goodrich vs 1-Collins-Lockwood
100 1.50 6.50 3♣ S -1 2-Barbour-Barbour vs 3-Waters-Thayer
100 1.50 6.50 3♣ S -1 9-Richard-Schramm vs 8-Rutherford-Hines
110 0.00 8.00 2♠ E 3-Hutton-Hutton vs 5-Opheim-Opheim
|
3 |
♠87
♥A9
♦J72
♣QT9654
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
♠A965432
♥J85
♦5
♣AJ
|
♠Q
♥KQT3
♦AQ83
♣K732
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6 ♦6 ♥4 ♠3 NT5 |
EW: 1♣ 1♦ 3♥ 4♠ 2NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
300 8.00 0.00 4♥ E -3 3-Hutton-Hutton vs 5-Opheim-Opheim
200 7.00 1.00 3N E -2 9-Richard-Schramm vs 8-Rutherford-Hines
100 6.00 2.00 3N E -1 4-Anderson-Lee-Branscum vs 7-Larson-Larson
150 5.00 3.00 3♣ N -3 5-Patchin-Boone vs 9-Boyd-Poole
170 3.50 4.50 3♠ W +1 1-Hanset-Goodrich vs 1-Collins-Lockwood
170 3.50 4.50 3♠ W +1 2-Barbour-Barbour vs 3-Waters-Thayer
620 1.00 7.00 4♠ W 6-Neitzel-Sahler vs 2-McLeod-McLeod
620 1.00 7.00 4♠ W 7-Rise-Lachowicz vs 4-Lepp-Lepp
620 1.00 7.00 4♠ W 8-Harvey-Smith-Bourdon vs 6-Adams-Ammann
|
4 |
♠T94
♥K7
♦QJ9764
♣83
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
♠85
♥QT43
♦A532
♣972
|
♠Q63
♥A9652
♦8
♣KQ64
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 3♦ 3♠ 2/1NT ♥5 |
EW: 2♥ ♣5 ♦3 ♠4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
750 8.00 0.00 5♦* N 4-Anderson-Lee-Branscum vs 6-Adams-Ammann
200 7.00 1.00 3♠ S +2 8-Harvey-Smith-Bourdon vs 5-Opheim-Opheim
170 4.50 3.50 3♠ S +1 5-Patchin-Boone vs 8-Rutherford-Hines
170 4.50 3.50 3♠ S +1 6-Neitzel-Sahler vs 1-Collins-Lockwood
170 4.50 3.50 3♠ S +1 7-Rise-Lachowicz vs 3-Waters-Thayer
170 4.50 3.50 3♠ S +1 9-Richard-Schramm vs 7-Larson-Larson
150 2.00 6.00 3♦ N +2 3-Hutton-Hutton vs 4-Lepp-Lepp
140 1.00 7.00 3♠ S 1-Hanset-Goodrich vs 9-Boyd-Poole
170 0.00 8.00 2♠ E +2 2-Barbour-Barbour vs 2-McLeod-McLeod
|
5 |
♠T7643
♥JT
♦AT85
♣K7
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
♠-
♥AKQ932
♦KJ42
♣Q95
|
♠AK
♥8764
♦9763
♣A84
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♠ ♣5 ♦2 ♥2 NT2 |
EW: 1♣ 4/5♦ 5♥ 5NT ♠4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
200 7.50 0.50 4♠* S -1 1-Hanset-Goodrich vs 9-Boyd-Poole
200 7.50 0.50 4♠* S -1 6-Neitzel-Sahler vs 1-Collins-Lockwood
420 6.00 2.00 4♥ W 7-Rise-Lachowicz vs 3-Waters-Thayer
450 4.00 4.00 5♥ W 8-Harvey-Smith-Bourdon vs 5-Opheim-Opheim
450 4.00 4.00 4♥ W +1 2-Barbour-Barbour vs 2-McLeod-McLeod
450 4.00 4.00 4♥ W +1 4-Anderson-Lee-Branscum vs 6-Adams-Ammann
480 2.00 6.00 5♥ W +1 9-Richard-Schramm vs 7-Larson-Larson
650 0.50 7.50 5♥* W 3-Hutton-Hutton vs 4-Lepp-Lepp
650 0.50 7.50 5♥* W 5-Patchin-Boone vs 8-Rutherford-Hines
|
6 |
♠Q73
♥J72
♦A765
♣A75
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
♠J96
♥A98
♦J98
♣J862
|
♠KT84
♥T4
♦Q432
♣Q43
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2/1♣ 2♦ 4/3♥ 2♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣5 ♦5 ♥3 ♠5 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
460 8.00 0.00 3N S +2 5-Patchin-Boone vs 8-Rutherford-Hines
430 6.50 1.50 3N S +1 3-Hutton-Hutton vs 4-Lepp-Lepp
430 6.50 1.50 3N S +1 4-Anderson-Lee-Branscum vs 6-Adams-Ammann
420 4.00 4.00 4♥ S 2-Barbour-Barbour vs 2-McLeod-McLeod
420 4.00 4.00 4♥ S 7-Rise-Lachowicz vs 3-Waters-Thayer
420 4.00 4.00 4♥ N 8-Harvey-Smith-Bourdon vs 5-Opheim-Opheim
200 2.00 6.00 2♥ S +3 6-Neitzel-Sahler vs 1-Collins-Lockwood
50 0.50 7.50 4♥ S -1 1-Hanset-Goodrich vs 9-Boyd-Poole
50 0.50 7.50 4♥ S -1 9-Richard-Schramm vs 7-Larson-Larson
|
7 |
♠J986
♥65
♦9754
♣AJ4
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
♠A742
♥A4
♦Q82
♣K872
|
♠K
♥Q982
♦AT63
♣T953
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ 1♠ ♣4 ♦5 NT5 |
EW: 3♣ 2♦ 1/-NT ♥6/5 ♠5 NT7/6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
200 8.00 0.00 2♦ E -2 7-Rise-Lachowicz vs 2-McLeod-McLeod
120 7.00 1.00 1N N +1 1-Hanset-Goodrich vs 8-Rutherford-Hines
110 5.50 2.50 2♠ S 2-Barbour-Barbour vs 1-Collins-Lockwood
110 5.50 2.50 2♥ S 5-Patchin-Boone vs 7-Larson-Larson
100 3.50 4.50 2N W -1 6-Neitzel-Sahler vs 9-Boyd-Poole
100 3.50 4.50 1N W -1 3-Hutton-Hutton vs 3-Waters-Thayer
90 2.00 6.00 1N E 9-Richard-Schramm vs 6-Adams-Ammann
110 1.00 7.00 3♣ E 4-Anderson-Lee-Branscum vs 5-Opheim-Opheim
200 0.00 8.00 2N N -2 8-Harvey-Smith-Bourdon vs 4-Lepp-Lepp
|
8 |
♠J96
♥AT8
♦AKT
♣KT43
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
♠KQ54
♥Q63
♦73
♣J952
|
♠2
♥7542
♦Q652
♣AQ87
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 3/2♦ 2♥ 3♠ 2/1NT |
EW: ♣6 ♦4 ♥5 ♠4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
420 8.00 0.00 4♠ S 1-Hanset-Goodrich vs 8-Rutherford-Hines
400 7.00 1.00 3N N 5-Patchin-Boone vs 7-Larson-Larson
50 5.00 3.00 3N S -1 4-Anderson-Lee-Branscum vs 5-Opheim-Opheim
50 5.00 3.00 3N S -1 6-Neitzel-Sahler vs 9-Boyd-Poole
50 5.00 3.00 4♠ N -1 3-Hutton-Hutton vs 3-Waters-Thayer
100 1.50 6.50 3N N -2 7-Rise-Lachowicz vs 2-McLeod-McLeod
100 1.50 6.50 4♠ N -2 2-Barbour-Barbour vs 1-Collins-Lockwood
100 1.50 6.50 4♠ N -2 8-Harvey-Smith-Bourdon vs 4-Lepp-Lepp
100 1.50 6.50 4♠ N -2 9-Richard-Schramm vs 6-Adams-Ammann
|
9 |
♠KJ4
♥AT86
♦98
♣Q432
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
♠T732
♥KQ72
♦KJ
♣K98
|
♠85
♥J54
♦AQ54
♣T765
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 1♥ 2♠ 1NT ♣6 |
EW: 1♣ ♦6 ♥6 ♠5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
150 8.00 0.00 1N N +2 5-Patchin-Boone vs 7-Larson-Larson
120 7.00 1.00 1N N +1 7-Rise-Lachowicz vs 2-McLeod-McLeod
110 5.50 2.50 2♠ S 8-Harvey-Smith-Bourdon vs 4-Lepp-Lepp
110 5.50 2.50 1♠ S +1 3-Hutton-Hutton vs 3-Waters-Thayer
100 4.00 4.00 1N E -1 1-Hanset-Goodrich vs 8-Rutherford-Hines
90 2.50 5.50 1N N 2-Barbour-Barbour vs 1-Collins-Lockwood
90 2.50 5.50 1N N 4-Anderson-Lee-Branscum vs 5-Opheim-Opheim
50 0.50 7.50 1N N -1 9-Richard-Schramm vs 6-Adams-Ammann
50 0.50 7.50 1♥ N -1 6-Neitzel-Sahler vs 9-Boyd-Poole
|
10 |
♠AKT4
♥Q754
♦A82
♣54
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
♠932
♥9
♦T765
♣KJ762
|
♠Q
♥T8
♦KQJ943
♣QT83
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 7♥ 7♠ 7NT ♣5 ♦4 |
EW: 2♣ 3♦ ♥0 ♠0 NT0 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
1460 8.00 0.00 6♠ S +1 5-Patchin-Boone vs 6-Adams-Ammann
710 5.00 3.00 4♠ S +3 3-Hutton-Hutton vs 2-McLeod-McLeod
710 5.00 3.00 4♠ N +3 9-Richard-Schramm vs 5-Opheim-Opheim
710 5.00 3.00 4♥ S +3 1-Hanset-Goodrich vs 7-Larson-Larson
710 5.00 3.00 4♥ S +3 6-Neitzel-Sahler vs 8-Rutherford-Hines
710 5.00 3.00 4♥ S +3 8-Harvey-Smith-Bourdon vs 3-Waters-Thayer
680 1.00 7.00 4♥ S +2 2-Barbour-Barbour vs 9-Boyd-Poole
680 1.00 7.00 4♥ S +2 4-Anderson-Lee-Branscum vs 4-Lepp-Lepp
680 1.00 7.00 4♥ S +2 7-Rise-Lachowicz vs 1-Collins-Lockwood
|
11 |
♠KQJT97
♥95
♦52
♣T86
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
♠64
♥Q6
♦J943
♣Q9542
|
♠-
♥KT8732
♦KQT7
♣AJ7
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♠ 3NT ♣4 ♦3 ♥3 |
EW: 3/2♣ 4♦ 3♥ ♠3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
450 6.50 1.50 4♠ S +1 1-Hanset-Goodrich vs 7-Larson-Larson
450 6.50 1.50 4♠ S +1 3-Hutton-Hutton vs 2-McLeod-McLeod
450 6.50 1.50 4♠ S +1 4-Anderson-Lee-Branscum vs 4-Lepp-Lepp
450 6.50 1.50 4♠ S +1 5-Patchin-Boone vs 6-Adams-Ammann
420 3.00 5.00 4♠ S 2-Barbour-Barbour vs 9-Boyd-Poole
420 3.00 5.00 4♠ S 6-Neitzel-Sahler vs 8-Rutherford-Hines
420 3.00 5.00 4♠ N 9-Richard-Schramm vs 5-Opheim-Opheim
300 1.00 7.00 5♥* E -2 7-Rise-Lachowicz vs 1-Collins-Lockwood
50 0.00 8.00 5♠ N -1 8-Harvey-Smith-Bourdon vs 3-Waters-Thayer
|
12 |
♠A2
♥K863
♦J64
♣KT53
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
♠QT97
♥Q74
♦Q7
♣AQ76
|
♠854
♥AJ952
♦KT85
♣8
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ ♦6 ♥4 ♠5 NT5 |
EW: -/1♦ 2/3♥ 1/2♠ 1/2NT ♣5 ♦6/7 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
50 7.50 0.50 4♥ E -1 5-Patchin-Boone vs 6-Adams-Ammann
50 7.50 0.50 2♥ E -1 3-Hutton-Hutton vs 2-McLeod-McLeod
PASS 6.00 2.00 Pass Out 1-Hanset-Goodrich vs 7-Larson-Larson
80 5.00 3.00 1♠ W 4-Anderson-Lee-Branscum vs 4-Lepp-Lepp
110 4.00 4.00 1♥ E +1 9-Richard-Schramm vs 5-Opheim-Opheim
140 3.00 5.00 2♥ E +1 2-Barbour-Barbour vs 9-Boyd-Poole
150 2.00 6.00 1N E +2 7-Rise-Lachowicz vs 1-Collins-Lockwood
180 1.00 7.00 1N E +3 8-Harvey-Smith-Bourdon vs 3-Waters-Thayer
200 0.00 8.00 2♥ E +3 6-Neitzel-Sahler vs 8-Rutherford-Hines
|
13 |
♠KQJ93
♥QT9
♦72
♣843
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
♠A6
♥AKJ72
♦AQ8
♣752
|
♠8542
♥4
♦T9653
♣AQT
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦1/2 ♥4 ♠4 NT4 |
EW: 2♣ 5♦ 3/2♥ 2♠ 2NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
300 7.50 0.50 3N W -3 9-Richard-Schramm vs 4-Lepp-Lepp
300 7.50 0.50 2N W -3 6-Neitzel-Sahler vs 7-Larson-Larson
200 6.00 2.00 3♥ W -2 1-Hanset-Goodrich vs 6-Adams-Ammann
100 4.50 3.50 1N W -1 3-Hutton-Hutton vs 1-Collins-Lockwood
100 4.50 3.50 2♥ W -1 7-Rise-Lachowicz vs 9-Boyd-Poole
140 3.00 5.00 2♥ W +1 2-Barbour-Barbour vs 8-Rutherford-Hines
150 2.00 6.00 2N E +1 8-Harvey-Smith-Bourdon vs 2-McLeod-McLeod
180 1.00 7.00 2N E +2 4-Anderson-Lee-Branscum vs 3-Waters-Thayer
200 0.00 8.00 1♠ N -2 5-Patchin-Boone vs 5-Opheim-Opheim
|
14 |
♠QJ62
♥KQT986
♦973
♣-
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
♠K73
♥2
♦K842
♣KQ764
|
♠AT54
♥J
♦A5
♣JT9852
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♥ 1NT ♣3 ♦6 ♠4 |
EW: 4♣ 3♠ ♦5 ♥4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
300 8.00 0.00 6♣* W -2 8-Harvey-Smith-Bourdon vs 2-McLeod-McLeod
100 6.00 2.00 5♥ S -2 5-Patchin-Boone vs 5-Opheim-Opheim
100 6.00 2.00 4♥ N -2 1-Hanset-Goodrich vs 6-Adams-Ammann
100 6.00 2.00 4♥ N -2 6-Neitzel-Sahler vs 7-Larson-Larson
150 4.00 4.00 5♥ S -3 3-Hutton-Hutton vs 1-Collins-Lockwood
300 3.00 5.00 5♥* S -2 4-Anderson-Lee-Branscum vs 3-Waters-Thayer
400 1.50 6.50 5♣ W 2-Barbour-Barbour vs 8-Rutherford-Hines
400 1.50 6.50 5♣ W 7-Rise-Lachowicz vs 9-Boyd-Poole
500 0.00 8.00 5♥* N -3 9-Richard-Schramm vs 4-Lepp-Lepp
|
15 |
♠J2
♥7
♦AQJ85
♣AKJ62
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
♠QT83
♥98643
♦6
♣974
|
♠95
♥QT2
♦T9742
♣Q85
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 6♣ 6♦ 4♥ 6♠ 6NT |
EW: ♣1 ♦1 ♥2 ♠1 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
690 5.00 3.00 4N N +2 7-Rise-Lachowicz vs 9-Boyd-Poole
690 5.00 3.00 3N S +3 2-Barbour-Barbour vs 8-Rutherford-Hines
690 5.00 3.00 3N S +3 5-Patchin-Boone vs 5-Opheim-Opheim
690 5.00 3.00 3N S +3 6-Neitzel-Sahler vs 7-Larson-Larson
690 5.00 3.00 3N S +3 8-Harvey-Smith-Bourdon vs 2-McLeod-McLeod
690 5.00 3.00 3N N +3 1-Hanset-Goodrich vs 6-Adams-Ammann
690 5.00 3.00 3N N +3 4-Anderson-Lee-Branscum vs 3-Waters-Thayer
650 1.00 7.00 4♠ S +1 3-Hutton-Hutton vs 1-Collins-Lockwood
200 0.00 8.00 6♠ S -2 9-Richard-Schramm vs 4-Lepp-Lepp
|
16 |
♠Q6
♥8
♦K9542
♣J7532
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
♠K43
♥KJT9432
♦J
♣Q6
|
♠J85
♥A5
♦AQT87
♣T94
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ ♦6 ♥3 ♠6 NT4 |
EW: 4♥ 1NT ♣5 ♦6 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 8.00 0.00 4♥ W -1 6-Neitzel-Sahler vs 6-Adams-Ammann
50 6.50 1.50 3♠ S -1 4-Anderson-Lee-Branscum vs 2-McLeod-McLeod
50 6.50 1.50 2♠ S -1 7-Rise-Lachowicz vs 8-Rutherford-Hines
100 5.00 3.00 3♠ S -2 3-Hutton-Hutton vs 9-Boyd-Poole
150 4.00 4.00 4♠ S -3 2-Barbour-Barbour vs 7-Larson-Larson
200 3.00 5.00 3♦ N -4 9-Richard-Schramm vs 3-Waters-Thayer
620 2.00 6.00 4♥ W 5-Patchin-Boone vs 4-Lepp-Lepp
790 0.50 7.50 4♥* W 1-Hanset-Goodrich vs 5-Opheim-Opheim
790 0.50 7.50 4♥* W 8-Harvey-Smith-Bourdon vs 1-Collins-Lockwood
|
17 |
♠AJT
♥KJ643
♦J72
♣72
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
♠Q972
♥A5
♦AK
♣KJT96
|
♠K5
♥72
♦Q8643
♣AQ53
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣1 ♦1 ♥5 ♠4 NT1 |
EW: 6♣ 6♦ 1♥ 3♠ 5NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
170 7.50 0.50 4♣ W +2 1-Hanset-Goodrich vs 5-Opheim-Opheim
170 7.50 0.50 3♣ W +3 5-Patchin-Boone vs 4-Lepp-Lepp
420 6.00 2.00 5♣ W +1 4-Anderson-Lee-Branscum vs 2-McLeod-McLeod
460 3.00 5.00 3N W +2 2-Barbour-Barbour vs 7-Larson-Larson
460 3.00 5.00 3N W +2 3-Hutton-Hutton vs 9-Boyd-Poole
460 3.00 5.00 3N W +2 6-Neitzel-Sahler vs 6-Adams-Ammann
460 3.00 5.00 3N W +2 7-Rise-Lachowicz vs 8-Rutherford-Hines
460 3.00 5.00 3N W +2 9-Richard-Schramm vs 3-Waters-Thayer
920 0.00 8.00 6♣ E 8-Harvey-Smith-Bourdon vs 1-Collins-Lockwood
|
18 |
♠JT3
♥A74
♦KJT4
♣Q96
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
♠86
♥K653
♦Q762
♣KT2
|
♠K95
♥JT982
♦5
♣AJ75
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♦ 4♠ 3NT ♣5 ♥4 |
EW: 3♥ ♣6 ♦2 ♠3 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
650 8.00 0.00 4♠ S +1 7-Rise-Lachowicz vs 8-Rutherford-Hines
620 7.00 1.00 4♠ S 5-Patchin-Boone vs 4-Lepp-Lepp
170 5.00 3.00 3♠ S +1 1-Hanset-Goodrich vs 5-Opheim-Opheim
170 5.00 3.00 3♠ S +1 3-Hutton-Hutton vs 9-Boyd-Poole
170 5.00 3.00 3♠ S +1 9-Richard-Schramm vs 3-Waters-Thayer
140 2.50 5.50 3♠ S 2-Barbour-Barbour vs 7-Larson-Larson
140 2.50 5.50 3♠ S 4-Anderson-Lee-Branscum vs 2-McLeod-McLeod
100 0.50 7.50 4♠ S -1 6-Neitzel-Sahler vs 6-Adams-Ammann
100 0.50 7.50 4♠ S -1 8-Harvey-Smith-Bourdon vs 1-Collins-Lockwood
|
19 |
♠AKJ
♥Q9874
♦84
♣954
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
♠8652
♥KT6
♦AKJ7
♣QT
|
♠Q9
♥A5
♦Q962
♣KJ762
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ ♣3 ♦3 ♠5 NT4 |
EW: 4♣ 4♦ 2♠ 2NT ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
130 6.00 2.00 3♦ W +1 2-Barbour-Barbour vs 6-Adams-Ammann
130 6.00 2.00 3♦ W +1 3-Hutton-Hutton vs 8-Rutherford-Hines
130 6.00 2.00 3♦ W +1 7-Rise-Lachowicz vs 7-Larson-Larson
130 6.00 2.00 3♦ W +1 8-Harvey-Smith-Bourdon vs 9-Boyd-Poole
130 6.00 2.00 3♦ W +1 9-Richard-Schramm vs 2-McLeod-McLeod
150 3.00 5.00 2♣ E +3 4-Anderson-Lee-Branscum vs 1-Collins-Lockwood
600 2.00 6.00 3N W 6-Neitzel-Sahler vs 5-Opheim-Opheim
630 1.00 7.00 3N W +1 5-Patchin-Boone vs 3-Waters-Thayer
660 0.00 8.00 3N W +2 1-Hanset-Goodrich vs 4-Lepp-Lepp
|
20 |
♠76
♥AJ985
♦QT2
♣972
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
♠T83
♥K3
♦AK74
♣8643
|
♠AQ954
♥T62
♦865
♣KQ
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 1♦ 3♥ 2NT ♠6 |
EW: 1/-♠ ♣4 ♦5 ♥4 ♠7/6 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
200 7.00 1.00 3♠ E -2 2-Barbour-Barbour vs 6-Adams-Ammann
200 7.00 1.00 2♠ E -2 9-Richard-Schramm vs 2-McLeod-McLeod
200 7.00 1.00 2♦ W -2 3-Hutton-Hutton vs 8-Rutherford-Hines
140 5.00 3.00 3♥ N 8-Harvey-Smith-Bourdon vs 9-Boyd-Poole
100 2.50 5.50 1N W -1 1-Hanset-Goodrich vs 4-Lepp-Lepp
100 2.50 5.50 2♠ E -1 4-Anderson-Lee-Branscum vs 1-Collins-Lockwood
100 2.50 5.50 2♠ E -1 6-Neitzel-Sahler vs 5-Opheim-Opheim
100 2.50 5.50 2♠ E -1 7-Rise-Lachowicz vs 7-Larson-Larson
100 0.00 8.00 3♥ N -1 5-Patchin-Boone vs 3-Waters-Thayer
|
21 |
♠T9
♥6532
♦AQ8654
♣8
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
♠AK75
♥QJ84
♦92
♣JT9
|
♠32
♥AK7
♦KT73
♣A432
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦4 ♥3 ♠5 NT4 |
EW: 2♣ 3♦ 4♥ 1♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
150 8.00 0.00 4♥ W -3 9-Richard-Schramm vs 2-McLeod-McLeod
100 6.00 2.00 3N W -2 1-Hanset-Goodrich vs 4-Lepp-Lepp
100 6.00 2.00 4♥ W -2 6-Neitzel-Sahler vs 5-Opheim-Opheim
100 6.00 2.00 4♥ W -2 8-Harvey-Smith-Bourdon vs 9-Boyd-Poole
50 4.00 4.00 3N W -1 5-Patchin-Boone vs 3-Waters-Thayer
140 3.00 5.00 2♥ W +1 3-Hutton-Hutton vs 8-Rutherford-Hines
300 2.00 6.00 2♦ N -3 2-Barbour-Barbour vs 6-Adams-Ammann
430 1.00 7.00 3N W +1 4-Anderson-Lee-Branscum vs 1-Collins-Lockwood
800 0.00 8.00 2♦* N -3 7-Rise-Lachowicz vs 7-Larson-Larson
|
22 |
♠KT8763
♥7
♦AK
♣KT75
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
♠AQ54
♥Q62
♦QJ75
♣Q2
|
♠9
♥JT854
♦T98
♣J983
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 1/2♦ 1♥ 4♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣3 ♦5 ♥6 ♠2/3 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
460 8.00 0.00 3N S +2 4-Anderson-Lee-Branscum vs 9-Boyd-Poole
450 6.50 1.50 4♠ N +1 5-Patchin-Boone vs 2-McLeod-McLeod
450 6.50 1.50 4♠ N +1 9-Richard-Schramm vs 1-Collins-Lockwood
430 5.00 3.00 3N S +1 3-Hutton-Hutton vs 7-Larson-Larson
300 4.00 4.00 1♠ W -3 7-Rise-Lachowicz vs 6-Adams-Ammann
200 3.00 5.00 2♠ N +3 8-Harvey-Smith-Bourdon vs 8-Rutherford-Hines
170 1.00 7.00 2♠ N +2 1-Hanset-Goodrich vs 3-Waters-Thayer
170 1.00 7.00 2♠ N +2 6-Neitzel-Sahler vs 4-Lepp-Lepp
170 1.00 7.00 1♠ N +3 2-Barbour-Barbour vs 5-Opheim-Opheim
|
23 |
♠J74
♥J43
♦A3
♣Q8754
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
♠K8
♥K98652
♦Q2
♣JT9
|
♠AQ953
♥AT
♦KT75
♣K6
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦4 ♥3 ♠3 NT3 |
EW: 1♣ 3♦ 4♥ 4♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
300 8.00 0.00 4♠ E -3 8-Harvey-Smith-Bourdon vs 8-Rutherford-Hines
100 7.00 1.00 4♥ W -1 9-Richard-Schramm vs 1-Collins-Lockwood
140 6.00 2.00 2♥ W +1 5-Patchin-Boone vs 2-McLeod-McLeod
170 5.00 3.00 2♥ W +2 4-Anderson-Lee-Branscum vs 9-Boyd-Poole
200 4.00 4.00 2♥ W +3 6-Neitzel-Sahler vs 4-Lepp-Lepp
620 2.50 5.50 4♥ W 7-Rise-Lachowicz vs 6-Adams-Ammann
620 2.50 5.50 4♥ E 3-Hutton-Hutton vs 7-Larson-Larson
650 0.50 7.50 4♥ W +1 1-Hanset-Goodrich vs 3-Waters-Thayer
650 0.50 7.50 4♥ W +1 2-Barbour-Barbour vs 5-Opheim-Opheim
|
24 |
♠Q32
♥J2
♦Q98632
♣J8
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
♠K
♥KT9543
♦J7
♣6543
|
♠J9864
♥Q6
♦KT5
♣AQ2
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ 1♠ 2NT ♣6 ♥5 |
EW: 2/1♥ ♣6 ♦4 ♠6/5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
120 8.00 0.00 2N S 6-Neitzel-Sahler vs 4-Lepp-Lepp
90 7.00 1.00 2♦ N 8-Harvey-Smith-Bourdon vs 8-Rutherford-Hines
50 5.50 2.50 3♥ W -1 3-Hutton-Hutton vs 7-Larson-Larson
50 5.50 2.50 3♥ W -1 9-Richard-Schramm vs 1-Collins-Lockwood
50 4.00 4.00 2N S -1 7-Rise-Lachowicz vs 6-Adams-Ammann
100 2.00 6.00 2N S -2 4-Anderson-Lee-Branscum vs 9-Boyd-Poole
100 2.00 6.00 3♠ N -2 5-Patchin-Boone vs 2-McLeod-McLeod
100 2.00 6.00 3♦ N -2 2-Barbour-Barbour vs 5-Opheim-Opheim
150 0.00 8.00 1N S -3 1-Hanset-Goodrich vs 3-Waters-Thayer
|
25 |
♠T643
♥Q952
♦T63
♣J4
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
♠K52
♥KT4
♦AK87
♣Q98
|
♠AQ98
♥AJ87
♦QJ
♣KT5
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣2 ♦1 ♥1 ♠1 NT1 |
EW: 4♣ 6♦ 6♥ 6♠ 6NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
200 8.00 0.00 6N E -2 4-Anderson-Lee-Branscum vs 8-Rutherford-Hines
100 7.00 1.00 6N E -1 5-Patchin-Boone vs 1-Collins-Lockwood
660 5.50 2.50 3N E +2 7-Rise-Lachowicz vs 5-Opheim-Opheim
660 5.50 2.50 3N E +2 8-Harvey-Smith-Bourdon vs 7-Larson-Larson
690 2.50 5.50 3N W +3 3-Hutton-Hutton vs 6-Adams-Ammann
690 2.50 5.50 3N E +3 1-Hanset-Goodrich vs 2-McLeod-McLeod
690 2.50 5.50 3N E +3 2-Barbour-Barbour vs 4-Lepp-Lepp
690 2.50 5.50 3N E +3 6-Neitzel-Sahler vs 3-Waters-Thayer
1440 0.00 8.00 6N W 9-Richard-Schramm vs 9-Boyd-Poole
|
26 |
♠A
♥A87653
♦KQ64
♣43
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
♠Q93
♥QJ9
♦A983
♣AT9
|
♠K8752
♥K2
♦J7
♣KQ62
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ ♣4 ♦6 ♠3 NT4 |
EW: 3♣ 1♦ 3♠ 3NT ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
200 7.50 0.50 4♠ E -2 3-Hutton-Hutton vs 6-Adams-Ammann
200 7.50 0.50 4♠ E -2 5-Patchin-Boone vs 1-Collins-Lockwood
100 4.50 3.50 4♠ E -1 4-Anderson-Lee-Branscum vs 8-Rutherford-Hines
100 4.50 3.50 4♠ E -1 6-Neitzel-Sahler vs 3-Waters-Thayer
100 4.50 3.50 4♠ E -1 7-Rise-Lachowicz vs 5-Opheim-Opheim
100 4.50 3.50 4♠ E -1 8-Harvey-Smith-Bourdon vs 7-Larson-Larson
140 2.00 6.00 3♠ E 2-Barbour-Barbour vs 4-Lepp-Lepp
170 1.00 7.00 3♠ E +1 1-Hanset-Goodrich vs 2-McLeod-McLeod
300 0.00 8.00 5♥ N -3 9-Richard-Schramm vs 9-Boyd-Poole
|
27 |
♠632
♥T42
♦T532
♣KQ7
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
♠KQT4
♥863
♦KQJ
♣JT9
|
♠A95
♥J9
♦9874
♣A854
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ ♣4 ♦5 ♠4 NT6 |
EW: 2♣ 2♦ 2♠ ♥5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
110 7.50 0.50 2♥ S 6-Neitzel-Sahler vs 3-Waters-Thayer
110 7.50 0.50 1♥ S +1 3-Hutton-Hutton vs 6-Adams-Ammann
90 6.00 2.00 1N S 4-Anderson-Lee-Branscum vs 8-Rutherford-Hines
80 4.50 3.50 1♥ S 7-Rise-Lachowicz vs 5-Opheim-Opheim
80 4.50 3.50 1♥ S 8-Harvey-Smith-Bourdon vs 7-Larson-Larson
50 3.00 5.00 3♣ E -1 2-Barbour-Barbour vs 4-Lepp-Lepp
110 2.00 6.00 2♠ W 1-Hanset-Goodrich vs 2-McLeod-McLeod
140 0.50 7.50 3♠ W 5-Patchin-Boone vs 1-Collins-Lockwood
140 0.50 7.50 2♠ W +1 9-Richard-Schramm vs 9-Boyd-Poole
|