1 |
♠T8
♥KQT6
♦AJ874
♣KQ
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
♠AQ63
♥J4
♦QT5
♣JT43
|
♠KJ7542
♥82
♦96
♣762
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 6♦ 6♥ 1♠ 1NT |
EW: ♣1 ♦0 ♥0 ♠6 NT0 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
510 6.00 2.00 4♥ S +3 1-Collins-Lockwood vs 1-Hanset-Goodrich
510 6.00 2.00 4♥ S +3 3-Waters-Thayer vs 5-Boyd-Poole
510 6.00 2.00 4♥ S +3 9-Richard-Schramm vs 8-Harvey-Smith-Bourdon
510 6.00 2.00 4♥ N +3 2-Barbour-Barbour vs 3-Hutton-Hutton
510 6.00 2.00 4♥ N +3 5-Patchin-Boone vs 9-Opheim-Opheim
480 2.50 5.50 4♥ S +2 4-Anderson-Lee-Branscum vs 7-Echtenkamp-Echtenkamp
480 2.50 5.50 4♥ S +2 6-Neitzel-Sahler vs 2-McLeod-McLeod
200 1.00 7.00 4♠ E -4 8-Rutherford-Hines vs 6-Adams-Ammann
100 0.00 8.00 3♠ E -2 7-Larson-Larson vs 4-Lepp-Lepp
|
2 |
♠T75
♥QJ86
♦632
♣KT8
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
♠Q32
♥K42
♦QT85
♣763
|
♠KJ6
♥T93
♦AK74
♣QJ4
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♥ 1♠ ♦5 NT6 |
EW: 2♦ 1NT ♣6 ♥6 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
50 6.50 1.50 2N W -1 1-Collins-Lockwood vs 1-Hanset-Goodrich
50 6.50 1.50 3♦ E -1 4-Anderson-Lee-Branscum vs 7-Echtenkamp-Echtenkamp
50 6.50 1.50 3♦ E -1 9-Richard-Schramm vs 8-Harvey-Smith-Bourdon
50 6.50 1.50 2♦ E -1 5-Patchin-Boone vs 9-Opheim-Opheim
90 2.50 5.50 1N W 6-Neitzel-Sahler vs 2-McLeod-McLeod
90 2.50 5.50 1N W 7-Larson-Larson vs 4-Lepp-Lepp
90 2.50 5.50 2♦ E 3-Waters-Thayer vs 5-Boyd-Poole
90 2.50 5.50 2♦ E 8-Rutherford-Hines vs 6-Adams-Ammann
200 0.00 8.00 2♥ N -2 2-Barbour-Barbour vs 3-Hutton-Hutton
|
3 |
♠KQJ42
♥AT64
♦KQ7
♣3
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
♠T3
♥8753
♦93
♣QJT87
|
♠5
♥KQJ92
♦AJT2
♣964
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 3♦ 6♠ 3/2NT ♥6 |
EW: 1♥ ♣6 ♦3 ♠1 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
980 7.50 0.50 6♠ S 3-Waters-Thayer vs 5-Boyd-Poole
980 7.50 0.50 6♠ S 5-Patchin-Boone vs 9-Opheim-Opheim
480 5.50 2.50 4♠ S +2 1-Collins-Lockwood vs 1-Hanset-Goodrich
480 5.50 2.50 4♠ N +2 7-Larson-Larson vs 4-Lepp-Lepp
450 4.00 4.00 4♠ N +1 8-Rutherford-Hines vs 6-Adams-Ammann
50 1.50 6.50 6♠ S -1 2-Barbour-Barbour vs 3-Hutton-Hutton
50 1.50 6.50 6♠ S -1 4-Anderson-Lee-Branscum vs 7-Echtenkamp-Echtenkamp
50 1.50 6.50 6♠ S -1 6-Neitzel-Sahler vs 2-McLeod-McLeod
50 1.50 6.50 6♠ S -1 9-Richard-Schramm vs 8-Harvey-Smith-Bourdon
|
4 |
♠J7543
♥KJ8
♦K6
♣A32
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
♠K
♥953
♦AJT87
♣9864
|
♠AT9
♥Q
♦Q9432
♣KQT5
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♥ 2♠ 1NT ♣3 ♦3 |
EW: 4♣ 4♦ ♥3 ♠4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
650 8.00 0.00 5♠ N 4-Anderson-Lee-Branscum vs 6-Adams-Ammann
200 6.50 1.50 5♦* E -1 5-Patchin-Boone vs 8-Harvey-Smith-Bourdon
200 6.50 1.50 5♦* E -1 6-Neitzel-Sahler vs 1-Hanset-Goodrich
140 5.00 3.00 3♠ N 8-Rutherford-Hines vs 5-Boyd-Poole
100 3.00 5.00 5♠ N -1 9-Richard-Schramm vs 7-Echtenkamp-Echtenkamp
100 3.00 5.00 4♠ N -1 1-Collins-Lockwood vs 9-Opheim-Opheim
100 3.00 5.00 3♠ N -1 2-Barbour-Barbour vs 2-McLeod-McLeod
130 1.00 7.00 4♦ E 3-Waters-Thayer vs 4-Lepp-Lepp
200 0.00 8.00 4♠ N -2 7-Larson-Larson vs 3-Hutton-Hutton
|
5 |
♠Q5
♥AT6
♦JT8642
♣92
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
♠7
♥J852
♦AK3
♣T7643
|
♠AKJ4
♥Q43
♦Q95
♣AQ8
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4 ♦6 ♥5 ♠6 NT4 |
EW: 3♣ 1♦ 2♥ 1/-♠ 3NT ♠7/6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
150 7.50 0.50 3N E -3 9-Richard-Schramm vs 7-Echtenkamp-Echtenkamp
150 7.50 0.50 2N E -3 8-Rutherford-Hines vs 5-Boyd-Poole
100 6.00 2.00 3N E -2 4-Anderson-Lee-Branscum vs 6-Adams-Ammann
100 5.00 3.00 2♠ S -1 1-Collins-Lockwood vs 9-Opheim-Opheim
150 4.00 4.00 1N E +2 6-Neitzel-Sahler vs 1-Hanset-Goodrich
430 1.50 6.50 3N E +1 2-Barbour-Barbour vs 2-McLeod-McLeod
430 1.50 6.50 3N E +1 3-Waters-Thayer vs 4-Lepp-Lepp
430 1.50 6.50 3N E +1 5-Patchin-Boone vs 8-Harvey-Smith-Bourdon
430 1.50 6.50 3N E +1 7-Larson-Larson vs 3-Hutton-Hutton
|
6 |
♠K
♥QJ863
♦953
♣9532
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
♠T865
♥K
♦AJ864
♣K86
|
♠97
♥A542
♦7
♣AQJT74
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 2♥ 1♠ ♣2 NT4 |
EW: 5♣ 3NT ♦6/5 ♥5 ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
140 8.00 0.00 2♠ S +1 8-Rutherford-Hines vs 5-Boyd-Poole
110 7.00 1.00 2♠ S 6-Neitzel-Sahler vs 1-Hanset-Goodrich
50 5.50 2.50 4♠ S -1 5-Patchin-Boone vs 8-Harvey-Smith-Bourdon
50 5.50 2.50 3♥ N -1 2-Barbour-Barbour vs 2-McLeod-McLeod
100 3.50 4.50 4♠ S -2 9-Richard-Schramm vs 7-Echtenkamp-Echtenkamp
100 3.50 4.50 4♥ N -2 4-Anderson-Lee-Branscum vs 6-Adams-Ammann
150 1.00 7.00 4♣ E +1 1-Collins-Lockwood vs 9-Opheim-Opheim
150 1.00 7.00 3♣ E +2 3-Waters-Thayer vs 4-Lepp-Lepp
150 1.00 7.00 3♣ E +2 7-Larson-Larson vs 3-Hutton-Hutton
|
7 |
♠-
♥Q543
♦953
♣QT9763
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
♠KJT432
♥AK96
♦87
♣2
|
♠Q7
♥T87
♦KT2
♣AJ854
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 2♦ ♥6 ♠4 NT6 |
EW: 1♥ 3/2♠ 1NT ♣5/4 ♦5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
200 7.50 0.50 4♠ W -2 6-Neitzel-Sahler vs 9-Opheim-Opheim
200 7.50 0.50 2♥ W -2 7-Larson-Larson vs 2-McLeod-McLeod
90 6.00 2.00 2♦ S 5-Patchin-Boone vs 7-Echtenkamp-Echtenkamp
100 3.50 4.50 1♠ S -1 3-Waters-Thayer vs 3-Hutton-Hutton
100 3.50 4.50 1♠ S -1 9-Richard-Schramm vs 6-Adams-Ammann
100 3.50 4.50 3♦ N -1 2-Barbour-Barbour vs 1-Hanset-Goodrich
100 3.50 4.50 3♣ N -1 1-Collins-Lockwood vs 8-Harvey-Smith-Bourdon
110 1.00 7.00 2♥ W 4-Anderson-Lee-Branscum vs 5-Boyd-Poole
200 0.00 8.00 1♠ S -2 8-Rutherford-Hines vs 4-Lepp-Lepp
|
8 |
♠KQ
♥AJT987
♦42
♣K75
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
♠J743
♥KQ43
♦KJ98
♣Q
|
♠AT2
♥6
♦QT7653
♣A96
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 2♥ ♦3 ♠5 NT5 |
EW: 4♦ 2♠ ♣4 ♥4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
50 8.00 0.00 5♦ W -1 2-Barbour-Barbour vs 1-Hanset-Goodrich
100 7.00 1.00 3♥ N -2 1-Collins-Lockwood vs 8-Harvey-Smith-Bourdon
130 4.00 4.00 4♦ W 4-Anderson-Lee-Branscum vs 5-Boyd-Poole
130 4.00 4.00 4♦ W 6-Neitzel-Sahler vs 9-Opheim-Opheim
130 4.00 4.00 4♦ W 8-Rutherford-Hines vs 4-Lepp-Lepp
130 4.00 4.00 3♦ W +1 9-Richard-Schramm vs 6-Adams-Ammann
130 4.00 4.00 3♦ E +1 3-Waters-Thayer vs 3-Hutton-Hutton
150 0.50 7.50 4♦ W +1 5-Patchin-Boone vs 7-Echtenkamp-Echtenkamp
150 0.50 7.50 4♦ W +1 7-Larson-Larson vs 2-McLeod-McLeod
|
9 |
♠96
♥AJ
♦AK76
♣AQT96
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
♠AQJT
♥KQ
♦T432
♣J85
|
♠8743
♥87653
♦Q
♣432
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4/5♣ 4/5♦ 1/2♥ 4/5NT ♠6 |
EW: ♣2 ♦2 ♥5 ♠6 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
460 8.00 0.00 3N S +2 3-Waters-Thayer vs 3-Hutton-Hutton
130 6.50 1.50 3♦ N +1 6-Neitzel-Sahler vs 9-Opheim-Opheim
130 6.50 1.50 2♦ N +2 1-Collins-Lockwood vs 8-Harvey-Smith-Bourdon
110 4.50 3.50 3♦ S 7-Larson-Larson vs 2-McLeod-McLeod
110 4.50 3.50 2♦ N +1 4-Anderson-Lee-Branscum vs 5-Boyd-Poole
90 3.00 5.00 2♦ N 8-Rutherford-Hines vs 4-Lepp-Lepp
50 1.50 6.50 5♦ N -1 9-Richard-Schramm vs 6-Adams-Ammann
50 1.50 6.50 3♦ S -1 2-Barbour-Barbour vs 1-Hanset-Goodrich
150 0.00 8.00 4♦ N -3 5-Patchin-Boone vs 7-Echtenkamp-Echtenkamp
|
10 |
♠JT5
♥Q
♦Q93
♣KJ9542
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
♠AQ83
♥T764
♦A64
♣83
|
♠9762
♥A832
♦K75
♣A6
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♦ ♥5 ♠5 NT6 |
EW: 2♥ 2♠ 1NT ♣6 ♦6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 8.00 0.00 3♠ W -1 5-Patchin-Boone vs 6-Adams-Ammann
PASS 5.50 2.50 Pass Out 1-Collins-Lockwood vs 7-Echtenkamp-Echtenkamp
PASS 5.50 2.50 Pass Out 3-Waters-Thayer vs 2-McLeod-McLeod
PASS 5.50 2.50 Pass Out 4-Anderson-Lee-Branscum vs 4-Lepp-Lepp
PASS 5.50 2.50 Pass Out 6-Neitzel-Sahler vs 8-Harvey-Smith-Bourdon
80 2.50 5.50 1♥ E 2-Barbour-Barbour vs 9-Opheim-Opheim
80 2.50 5.50 1♥ E 9-Richard-Schramm vs 5-Boyd-Poole
110 0.50 7.50 2♠ W 8-Rutherford-Hines vs 3-Hutton-Hutton
110 0.50 7.50 1♠ E +1 7-Larson-Larson vs 1-Hanset-Goodrich
|
11 |
♠AT9
♥Q64
♦Q743
♣962
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
♠KQJ86
♥A7
♦985
♣J74
|
♠7
♥832
♦KT62
♣AQT53
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♥ ♣4 ♦5 ♠5 NT6 |
EW: 2♣ 1♦ 1♠ ♥4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
150 8.00 0.00 2♠ W -3 4-Anderson-Lee-Branscum vs 4-Lepp-Lepp
140 6.50 1.50 3♥ S 2-Barbour-Barbour vs 9-Opheim-Opheim
140 6.50 1.50 2♥ S +1 5-Patchin-Boone vs 6-Adams-Ammann
110 5.00 3.00 2♥ S 1-Collins-Lockwood vs 7-Echtenkamp-Echtenkamp
50 3.50 4.50 3♥ S -1 7-Larson-Larson vs 1-Hanset-Goodrich
50 3.50 4.50 2♥ S -1 9-Richard-Schramm vs 5-Boyd-Poole
110 1.50 6.50 2♥ E 3-Waters-Thayer vs 2-McLeod-McLeod
110 1.50 6.50 3♣ E 8-Rutherford-Hines vs 3-Hutton-Hutton
150 0.00 8.00 1N E +2 6-Neitzel-Sahler vs 8-Harvey-Smith-Bourdon
|
12 |
♠T
♥KJT75
♦6542
♣AQ5
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
♠AKJ95
♥AQ9
♦873
♣K8
|
♠742
♥864
♦9
♣JT9764
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♦ 2♥ 2NT ♣4 ♠5 |
EW: 1/2♣ 1♠ ♦2 ♥3/4 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
170 8.00 0.00 4♦ S +2 4-Anderson-Lee-Branscum vs 4-Lepp-Lepp
130 6.50 1.50 4♦ S 6-Neitzel-Sahler vs 8-Harvey-Smith-Bourdon
130 6.50 1.50 3♦ S +1 2-Barbour-Barbour vs 9-Opheim-Opheim
110 5.00 3.00 2♥ N 3-Waters-Thayer vs 2-McLeod-McLeod
100 3.50 4.50 5♣ E -2 8-Rutherford-Hines vs 3-Hutton-Hutton
100 3.50 4.50 4♣ E -2 5-Patchin-Boone vs 6-Adams-Ammann
50 1.50 6.50 2♠ W -1 7-Larson-Larson vs 1-Hanset-Goodrich
50 1.50 6.50 2♠ W -1 9-Richard-Schramm vs 5-Boyd-Poole
100 0.00 8.00 4♦ S -1 1-Collins-Lockwood vs 7-Echtenkamp-Echtenkamp
|
13 |
♠K3
♥AT53
♦K75
♣9743
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
♠A84
♥K8
♦QT64
♣AKJ2
|
♠QJT976
♥Q6
♦82
♣QT8
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♥ ♣4 ♦6 ♠4 NT4 |
EW: 3♣ 3♠ ♦6 ♥5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 8.00 0.00 4♠ W -1 2-Barbour-Barbour vs 8-Harvey-Smith-Bourdon
140 7.00 1.00 2♠ E +1 9-Richard-Schramm vs 4-Lepp-Lepp
170 5.00 3.00 3♠ E +1 8-Rutherford-Hines vs 2-McLeod-McLeod
170 5.00 3.00 2♠ W +2 3-Waters-Thayer vs 1-Hanset-Goodrich
170 5.00 3.00 2♠ W +2 6-Neitzel-Sahler vs 7-Echtenkamp-Echtenkamp
620 2.00 6.00 4♠ W 1-Collins-Lockwood vs 6-Adams-Ammann
620 2.00 6.00 4♠ W 5-Patchin-Boone vs 5-Boyd-Poole
620 2.00 6.00 4♠ W 7-Larson-Larson vs 9-Opheim-Opheim
650 0.00 8.00 4♠ E +1 4-Anderson-Lee-Branscum vs 3-Hutton-Hutton
|
14 |
♠AJT762
♥J95
♦6
♣T87
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
♠3
♥AK32
♦KQ9753
♣Q2
|
♠K98
♥Q74
♦AJ
♣AK643
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣0 ♦0 ♥0 ♠5 NT0 |
EW: 6♣ 6♦ 6♥ 2♠ 6NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
420 7.50 0.50 5♦ W +1 5-Patchin-Boone vs 5-Boyd-Poole
420 7.50 0.50 5♦ W +1 6-Neitzel-Sahler vs 7-Echtenkamp-Echtenkamp
440 6.00 2.00 5♦ E +2 7-Larson-Larson vs 9-Opheim-Opheim
490 4.50 3.50 3N E +3 4-Anderson-Lee-Branscum vs 3-Hutton-Hutton
490 4.50 3.50 3N E +3 9-Richard-Schramm vs 4-Lepp-Lepp
520 3.00 5.00 3N E +4 1-Collins-Lockwood vs 6-Adams-Ammann
920 1.50 6.50 6♦ W 8-Rutherford-Hines vs 2-McLeod-McLeod
920 1.50 6.50 6♦ E 2-Barbour-Barbour vs 8-Harvey-Smith-Bourdon
1020 0.00 8.00 6N E +1 3-Waters-Thayer vs 1-Hanset-Goodrich
|
15 |
♠A
♥AKQT
♦AJ87
♣8754
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
♠KQT4
♥J964
♦K92
♣QT
|
♠987652
♥875
♦643
♣K
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 6♣ 6♦ 5♥ 3♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣1 ♦1 ♥1 ♠4 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
1100 8.00 0.00 4♠* E -5 1-Collins-Lockwood vs 6-Adams-Ammann
620 6.50 1.50 5♣ S +1 4-Anderson-Lee-Branscum vs 3-Hutton-Hutton
620 6.50 1.50 5♣ S +1 5-Patchin-Boone vs 5-Boyd-Poole
500 5.00 3.00 3♠* E -3 7-Larson-Larson vs 9-Opheim-Opheim
300 4.00 4.00 1♦ W -6 9-Richard-Schramm vs 4-Lepp-Lepp
170 3.00 5.00 3♣ N +3 2-Barbour-Barbour vs 8-Harvey-Smith-Bourdon
100 2.00 6.00 3♠ E -2 3-Waters-Thayer vs 1-Hanset-Goodrich
200 0.50 7.50 3N N -2 6-Neitzel-Sahler vs 7-Echtenkamp-Echtenkamp
200 0.50 7.50 3N N -2 8-Rutherford-Hines vs 2-McLeod-McLeod
|
16 |
♠K42
♥K8
♦A975
♣9532
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
♠QJT
♥J643
♦QJ2
♣AJ6
|
♠A976
♥QT95
♦8
♣KT74
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ ♣4 ♥3 ♠4 NT4 |
EW: 2♣ 3♥ 2♠ 3NT ♦6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
200 8.00 0.00 3N W -2 6-Neitzel-Sahler vs 6-Adams-Ammann
100 7.00 1.00 3♥ E -1 1-Collins-Lockwood vs 5-Boyd-Poole
PASS 5.50 2.50 Pass Out 3-Waters-Thayer vs 9-Opheim-Opheim
PASS 5.50 2.50 Pass Out 4-Anderson-Lee-Branscum vs 2-McLeod-McLeod
140 2.50 5.50 3♥ W 9-Richard-Schramm vs 3-Hutton-Hutton
140 2.50 5.50 3♥ E 2-Barbour-Barbour vs 7-Echtenkamp-Echtenkamp
140 2.50 5.50 3♥ E 8-Rutherford-Hines vs 1-Hanset-Goodrich
140 2.50 5.50 2♥ E +1 7-Larson-Larson vs 8-Harvey-Smith-Bourdon
170 0.00 8.00 2♥ E +2 5-Patchin-Boone vs 4-Lepp-Lepp
|
17 |
♠J8642
♥94
♦J97432
♣-
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
♠KT
♥Q65
♦-
♣JT965432
|
♠Q93
♥AJ872
♦AK6
♣K8
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 1♠ ♣3 ♥4 NT5 |
EW: 4♣ 3♥ ♦5 ♠5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
200 8.00 0.00 3N E -4 7-Larson-Larson vs 8-Harvey-Smith-Bourdon
100 7.00 1.00 5♣* W -1 3-Waters-Thayer vs 9-Opheim-Opheim
50 5.00 3.00 4♥ E -1 6-Neitzel-Sahler vs 6-Adams-Ammann
50 5.00 3.00 5♣ W -1 4-Anderson-Lee-Branscum vs 2-McLeod-McLeod
50 5.00 3.00 5♣ E -1 2-Barbour-Barbour vs 7-Echtenkamp-Echtenkamp
130 3.00 5.00 3♣ E +1 9-Richard-Schramm vs 3-Hutton-Hutton
400 2.00 6.00 3N E 8-Rutherford-Hines vs 1-Hanset-Goodrich
500 1.00 7.00 5♦* S -3 1-Collins-Lockwood vs 5-Boyd-Poole
510 0.00 8.00 4♣* W 5-Patchin-Boone vs 4-Lepp-Lepp
|
18 |
♠K97
♥AQT43
♦T62
♣K6
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
♠AJT83
♥J
♦Q874
♣AQJ
|
♠64
♥K9652
♦A95
♣742
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6 ♦4 ♥5 ♠4 NT4/5 |
EW: 1♣ 2/3♦ 1/2♥ 2/3♠ 1/2NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
110 8.00 0.00 2♠ W 3-Waters-Thayer vs 9-Opheim-Opheim
140 6.50 1.50 2♠ W +1 6-Neitzel-Sahler vs 6-Adams-Ammann
140 6.50 1.50 2♠ W +1 7-Larson-Larson vs 8-Harvey-Smith-Bourdon
200 3.50 4.50 2♥ N -2 1-Collins-Lockwood vs 5-Boyd-Poole
200 3.50 4.50 2♥ N -2 2-Barbour-Barbour vs 7-Echtenkamp-Echtenkamp
200 3.50 4.50 2♥ N -2 4-Anderson-Lee-Branscum vs 2-McLeod-McLeod
200 3.50 4.50 2♥ N -2 9-Richard-Schramm vs 3-Hutton-Hutton
300 0.50 7.50 2♥ N -3 5-Patchin-Boone vs 4-Lepp-Lepp
300 0.50 7.50 2♥ N -3 8-Rutherford-Hines vs 1-Hanset-Goodrich
|
19 |
♠T52
♥QT9
♦KQ8
♣J654
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
♠Q84
♥854
♦AT9752
♣3
|
♠9763
♥AJ62
♦43
♣A72
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 1♥ 1♠ 3NT ♦6 |
EW: 1♦ ♣3 ♥5 ♠5 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
430 7.50 0.50 3N S +1 5-Patchin-Boone vs 3-Hutton-Hutton
430 7.50 0.50 3N N +1 8-Rutherford-Hines vs 9-Opheim-Opheim
400 4.50 3.50 3N S 1-Collins-Lockwood vs 4-Lepp-Lepp
400 4.50 3.50 3N S 3-Waters-Thayer vs 8-Harvey-Smith-Bourdon
400 4.50 3.50 3N S 6-Neitzel-Sahler vs 5-Boyd-Poole
400 4.50 3.50 3N S 9-Richard-Schramm vs 2-McLeod-McLeod
150 2.00 6.00 1N S +2 7-Larson-Larson vs 7-Echtenkamp-Echtenkamp
130 0.50 7.50 3♣ S +1 2-Barbour-Barbour vs 6-Adams-Ammann
130 0.50 7.50 3♣ S +1 4-Anderson-Lee-Branscum vs 1-Hanset-Goodrich
|
20 |
♠9
♥Q62
♦AK82
♣A6432
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
♠KJT7542
♥974
♦943
♣-
|
♠86
♥AK5
♦QJT7
♣KT75
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ -/1♦ 2♥ 1NT ♦6/7 ♠4/5 |
EW: 2♠ ♣4 ♦6 ♥5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
140 8.00 0.00 3♥ S 9-Richard-Schramm vs 2-McLeod-McLeod
100 6.50 1.50 4♠ W -1 3-Waters-Thayer vs 8-Harvey-Smith-Bourdon
100 6.50 1.50 3♠ W -1 6-Neitzel-Sahler vs 5-Boyd-Poole
100 4.50 3.50 2N S -1 8-Rutherford-Hines vs 9-Opheim-Opheim
100 4.50 3.50 4♣ N -1 7-Larson-Larson vs 7-Echtenkamp-Echtenkamp
140 3.00 5.00 3♠ W 1-Collins-Lockwood vs 4-Lepp-Lepp
170 1.50 6.50 3♠ W +1 2-Barbour-Barbour vs 6-Adams-Ammann
170 1.50 6.50 3♠ W +1 4-Anderson-Lee-Branscum vs 1-Hanset-Goodrich
200 0.00 8.00 3♥ S -2 5-Patchin-Boone vs 3-Hutton-Hutton
|
21 |
♠AJ7
♥A2
♦A73
♣Q8532
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
♠KQ4
♥9764
♦K92
♣AK4
|
♠8
♥KJT853
♦JT654
♣7
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3/4♣ 2♠ ♦3 ♥2 NT3 |
EW: 3♦ 4♥ 1NT ♣3 ♠3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
620 8.00 0.00 4♠ N 5-Patchin-Boone vs 3-Hutton-Hutton
140 7.00 1.00 2♠ N +1 3-Waters-Thayer vs 8-Harvey-Smith-Bourdon
50 6.00 2.00 4♥ E -1 2-Barbour-Barbour vs 6-Adams-Ammann
110 5.00 3.00 3♦ W 1-Collins-Lockwood vs 4-Lepp-Lepp
170 4.00 4.00 3♥ W +1 8-Rutherford-Hines vs 9-Opheim-Opheim
200 3.00 5.00 4♠* N -1 9-Richard-Schramm vs 2-McLeod-McLeod
420 2.00 6.00 4♥ E 7-Larson-Larson vs 7-Echtenkamp-Echtenkamp
450 1.00 7.00 4♥ E +1 4-Anderson-Lee-Branscum vs 1-Hanset-Goodrich
800 0.00 8.00 5♠* S -3 6-Neitzel-Sahler vs 5-Boyd-Poole
|
22 |
♠KQ72
♥K74
♦AJ
♣AT73
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
♠A
♥A9832
♦Q8752
♣62
|
♠T653
♥T65
♦T43
♣QJ5
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 1♦ 1♥ 4♠ 4NT |
EW: ♣3 ♦6 ♥6 ♠3 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
420 6.50 1.50 4♠ N 3-Waters-Thayer vs 7-Echtenkamp-Echtenkamp
420 6.50 1.50 4♠ N 5-Patchin-Boone vs 2-McLeod-McLeod
420 6.50 1.50 4♠ N 6-Neitzel-Sahler vs 4-Lepp-Lepp
420 6.50 1.50 4♠ N 7-Larson-Larson vs 6-Adams-Ammann
400 4.00 4.00 3N N 8-Rutherford-Hines vs 8-Harvey-Smith-Bourdon
170 3.00 5.00 3♠ S +1 4-Anderson-Lee-Branscum vs 9-Opheim-Opheim
140 2.00 6.00 1♠ S +2 2-Barbour-Barbour vs 5-Boyd-Poole
50 0.50 7.50 3N N -1 9-Richard-Schramm vs 1-Hanset-Goodrich
50 0.50 7.50 4♠ N -1 1-Collins-Lockwood vs 3-Hutton-Hutton
|
23 |
♠QT
♥KQ64
♦T86
♣J854
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
♠K98
♥AJT8
♦KQ54
♣K9
|
♠J654
♥9532
♦972
♣T2
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3/4♣ 1/2♦ 1♥ 2♠ 2/3NT |
EW: ♣3/4 ♦5 ♥6 ♠5 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
150 7.50 0.50 2N N +1 7-Larson-Larson vs 6-Adams-Ammann
150 7.50 0.50 1N S +2 1-Collins-Lockwood vs 3-Hutton-Hutton
130 5.50 2.50 3♣ S +1 4-Anderson-Lee-Branscum vs 9-Opheim-Opheim
130 5.50 2.50 2♣ S +2 2-Barbour-Barbour vs 5-Boyd-Poole
120 4.00 4.00 1N S +1 3-Waters-Thayer vs 7-Echtenkamp-Echtenkamp
110 2.00 6.00 3♣ S 5-Patchin-Boone vs 2-McLeod-McLeod
110 2.00 6.00 2♣ S +1 6-Neitzel-Sahler vs 4-Lepp-Lepp
110 2.00 6.00 2♣ S +1 9-Richard-Schramm vs 1-Hanset-Goodrich
100 0.00 8.00 1N W -1 8-Rutherford-Hines vs 8-Harvey-Smith-Bourdon
|
24 |
♠Q973
♥6
♦T9632
♣754
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
♠KJ4
♥K87
♦Q754
♣T96
|
♠A85
♥T432
♦K8
♣KQJ8
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 1♠ ♣6 ♥6 NT6 |
EW: 1♣ 1/-♥ 1NT ♦6 ♥7/6 ♠6/5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 8.00 0.00 1N W -2 3-Waters-Thayer vs 7-Echtenkamp-Echtenkamp
80 7.00 1.00 1♥ S 6-Neitzel-Sahler vs 4-Lepp-Lepp
50 5.50 2.50 2♥ S -1 8-Rutherford-Hines vs 8-Harvey-Smith-Bourdon
50 5.50 2.50 1♥ S -1 4-Anderson-Lee-Branscum vs 9-Opheim-Opheim
90 3.00 5.00 1N W 2-Barbour-Barbour vs 5-Boyd-Poole
90 3.00 5.00 1N W 5-Patchin-Boone vs 2-McLeod-McLeod
90 3.00 5.00 1N W 9-Richard-Schramm vs 1-Hanset-Goodrich
100 1.00 7.00 2♥ S -2 1-Collins-Lockwood vs 3-Hutton-Hutton
120 0.00 8.00 1N W +1 7-Larson-Larson vs 6-Adams-Ammann
|
25 |
♠732
♥KJ852
♦QJT8
♣7
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
♠T65
♥T743
♦7543
♣J4
|
♠AK
♥6
♦K2
♣AQT98532
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♦ 4♥ 3♠ 4NT ♣4 |
EW: 3♣ ♦3 ♥3 ♠3 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
650 8.00 0.00 5♥* N 3-Waters-Thayer vs 6-Adams-Ammann
420 7.00 1.00 4♥ N 4-Anderson-Lee-Branscum vs 8-Harvey-Smith-Bourdon
200 5.50 2.50 5♣* E -1 9-Richard-Schramm vs 9-Opheim-Opheim
200 5.50 2.50 4♣* E -1 1-Collins-Lockwood vs 2-McLeod-McLeod
100 3.50 4.50 5♣ E -1 2-Barbour-Barbour vs 4-Lepp-Lepp
100 3.50 4.50 5♣ E -1 8-Rutherford-Hines vs 7-Echtenkamp-Echtenkamp
100 2.00 6.00 4♠ S -2 7-Larson-Larson vs 5-Boyd-Poole
110 1.00 7.00 3♣ E 6-Neitzel-Sahler vs 3-Hutton-Hutton
630 0.00 8.00 3N E +1 5-Patchin-Boone vs 1-Hanset-Goodrich
|
26 |
♠K6
♥Q93
♦K843
♣JT64
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
♠832
♥K2
♦T9765
♣AK2
|
♠QJT
♥AJT65
♦Q2
♣Q98
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6 ♦5 ♥4 ♠6 NT4 |
EW: 1♣ 1♦ 2♥ 1♠ 3/2NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
300 8.00 0.00 4♥ E -3 9-Richard-Schramm vs 9-Opheim-Opheim
200 7.00 1.00 4♥ E -2 4-Anderson-Lee-Branscum vs 8-Harvey-Smith-Bourdon
PASS 6.00 2.00 Pass Out 5-Patchin-Boone vs 1-Hanset-Goodrich
110 5.00 3.00 2♥ E 2-Barbour-Barbour vs 4-Lepp-Lepp
140 4.00 4.00 2♥ E +1 6-Neitzel-Sahler vs 3-Hutton-Hutton
150 2.50 5.50 1N W +2 1-Collins-Lockwood vs 2-McLeod-McLeod
150 2.50 5.50 1N E +2 3-Waters-Thayer vs 6-Adams-Ammann
600 0.50 7.50 3N E 7-Larson-Larson vs 5-Boyd-Poole
600 0.50 7.50 3N E 8-Rutherford-Hines vs 7-Echtenkamp-Echtenkamp
|
27 |
♠AKQ42
♥Q942
♦Q7
♣J8
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
♠86
♥KT5
♦J95
♣A9765
|
♠953
♥J873
♦KT43
♣K2
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♥ 3♠ 2NT ♦6 |
EW: ♣6 ♦6 ♥5 ♠4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
420 6.50 1.50 4♠ N 1-Collins-Lockwood vs 2-McLeod-McLeod
420 6.50 1.50 4♠ N 3-Waters-Thayer vs 6-Adams-Ammann
420 6.50 1.50 4♠ N 4-Anderson-Lee-Branscum vs 8-Harvey-Smith-Bourdon
420 6.50 1.50 4♠ N 7-Larson-Larson vs 5-Boyd-Poole
170 4.00 4.00 3♠ N +1 2-Barbour-Barbour vs 4-Lepp-Lepp
50 2.50 5.50 4♠ N -1 6-Neitzel-Sahler vs 3-Hutton-Hutton
50 2.50 5.50 4♠ N -1 8-Rutherford-Hines vs 7-Echtenkamp-Echtenkamp
100 0.50 7.50 4♠ N -2 5-Patchin-Boone vs 1-Hanset-Goodrich
100 0.50 7.50 4♠ N -2 9-Richard-Schramm vs 9-Opheim-Opheim
|