1 |
♠QJ9
♥AJ54
♦K32
♣984
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
♠K862
♥KQT2
♦QT6
♣Q7
|
♠543
♥8
♦A74
♣AJT652
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ ♣4 ♦6 ♠5 NT5 |
EW: 2♣ 1♠ 2NT ♦6 ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
150 4.00 0.00 2♥ W -3 2-Hayward-Attebury vs 2-Swanson-Alberts
100 3.00 1.00 3♣ W -2 5-Wagner-Hanson vs 3-Smith-Smith
50 2.00 2.00 3N W -1 1-Allen-Blonarwitz vs 5-Reed-Slade
120 1.00 3.00 2N W 4-Fallen-Stoa vs 1-Titcomb-Hubman
400 0.00 4.00 3N W 3-Vaughan-Vaughan vs 4-Almy-Almy
|
2 |
♠AT86
♥AQ2
♦JT4
♣A83
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
♠KJ952
♥763
♦A53
♣KJ
|
♠Q4
♥T854
♦KQ9
♣QT95
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦6 ♥6 ♠6 NT5 |
EW: 1♣ 1♦ 1♠ 2NT ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 3.50 0.50 1N N -1 4-Fallen-Stoa vs 1-Titcomb-Hubman
100 3.50 0.50 1N N -1 5-Wagner-Hanson vs 3-Smith-Smith
150 2.00 2.00 1N E +2 2-Hayward-Attebury vs 2-Swanson-Alberts
200 1.00 3.00 1♠ N -2 3-Vaughan-Vaughan vs 4-Almy-Almy
400 0.00 4.00 2♥ S -4 1-Allen-Blonarwitz vs 5-Reed-Slade
|
3 |
♠AJ43
♥9
♦Q8642
♣543
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
♠QT76
♥63
♦KJ7
♣AQT6
|
♠K852
♥KQJT5
♦53
♣92
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: -/1♣ 2♦ ♣6/7 ♥5 ♠4 NT5 |
EW: 2♥ 3♠ 1NT ♣6 ♦4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
200 4.00 0.00 4♠ W -2 2-Hayward-Attebury vs 2-Swanson-Alberts
100 3.00 1.00 2N W -1 1-Allen-Blonarwitz vs 5-Reed-Slade
90 2.00 2.00 2♣ S 3-Vaughan-Vaughan vs 4-Almy-Almy
100 1.00 3.00 1N N -2 4-Fallen-Stoa vs 1-Titcomb-Hubman
110 0.00 4.00 2♠ E 5-Wagner-Hanson vs 3-Smith-Smith
|
4 |
♠AK
♥AQJ
♦AT862
♣J42
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
♠Q542
♥85
♦Q73
♣AK53
|
♠T76
♥964
♦94
♣QT876
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 6♦ 6♥ 2♠ 2NT ♣6 |
EW: ♣6 ♦0/1 ♥0 ♠4 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
650 3.00 1.00 5♥ S 4-Fallen-Stoa vs 1-Titcomb-Hubman
650 3.00 1.00 4♥ S +1 1-Allen-Blonarwitz vs 5-Reed-Slade
650 3.00 1.00 4♥ S +1 5-Wagner-Hanson vs 3-Smith-Smith
620 1.00 3.00 4♥ S 3-Vaughan-Vaughan vs 4-Almy-Almy
110 0.00 4.00 2♦ N +1 2-Hayward-Attebury vs 2-Swanson-Alberts
|
5 |
♠Q97653
♥75
♦J4
♣AJ7
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
♠A2
♥JT632
♦982
♣Q54
|
♠T4
♥AKQ84
♦T63
♣863
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 5♦ 1♥ 5♠ 1NT |
EW: ♣2 ♦2 ♥6 ♠2 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
650 3.00 1.00 4♠ N +1 1-Allen-Blonarwitz vs 4-Almy-Almy
650 3.00 1.00 4♠ N +1 3-Vaughan-Vaughan vs 3-Smith-Smith
650 3.00 1.00 4♠ N +1 5-Wagner-Hanson vs 2-Swanson-Alberts
150 0.50 3.50 3♦ S +2 2-Hayward-Attebury vs 1-Titcomb-Hubman
150 0.50 3.50 3♦ S +2 4-Fallen-Stoa vs 5-Reed-Slade
|
6 |
♠QT
♥QJ9873
♦65
♣T32
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
♠983
♥K54
♦KQ93
♣874
|
♠AJ
♥62
♦8742
♣AQJ96
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♥ 1♠ ♣4 ♦4 NT4 |
EW: 2♣ 3♦ 1NT ♥4 ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
200 4.00 0.00 3♦ W -2 5-Wagner-Hanson vs 3-Smith-Smith
140 2.50 1.50 2♠ S +1 2-Hayward-Attebury vs 2-Swanson-Alberts
140 2.50 1.50 2♠ S +1 3-Vaughan-Vaughan vs 4-Almy-Almy
80 1.00 3.00 1♠ S 4-Fallen-Stoa vs 1-Titcomb-Hubman
50 0.00 4.00 2♠ S -1 1-Allen-Blonarwitz vs 5-Reed-Slade
|
7 |
♠K82
♥KT76
♦Q6
♣J753
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
♠96
♥QJ
♦KJ954
♣T986
|
♠T7543
♥83
♦T732
♣AK
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 4♥ 1♠ 3NT ♦5 |
EW: 2♦ ♣4 ♥3 ♠5 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
650 3.50 0.50 4♥ S +1 4-Fallen-Stoa vs 5-Reed-Slade
650 3.50 0.50 4♥ S +1 5-Wagner-Hanson vs 2-Swanson-Alberts
620 2.00 2.00 4♥ S 1-Allen-Blonarwitz vs 4-Almy-Almy
200 1.00 3.00 3♥ S +2 3-Vaughan-Vaughan vs 3-Smith-Smith
150 0.00 4.00 1N S +2 2-Hayward-Attebury vs 1-Titcomb-Hubman
|
8 |
♠AQJ72
♥JT42
♦KT
♣A9
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
♠-
♥AQ763
♦Q98743
♣K5
|
♠KT53
♥8
♦62
♣JT7643
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ 2♠ 3NT ♣6 ♦5 |
EW: -/1♦ ♣6 ♦6/7 ♥5 ♠5 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
50 4.00 0.00 3♠ N -1 4-Fallen-Stoa vs 5-Reed-Slade
100 3.00 1.00 4♠ N -2 5-Wagner-Hanson vs 2-Swanson-Alberts
150 1.50 2.50 4♠ N -3 2-Hayward-Attebury vs 1-Titcomb-Hubman
150 1.50 2.50 4♠ N -3 3-Vaughan-Vaughan vs 3-Smith-Smith
200 0.00 4.00 3N N -4 1-Allen-Blonarwitz vs 4-Almy-Almy
|
9 |
♠87
♥542
♦43
♣AQ7653
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
♠KT953
♥KQ7
♦AT97
♣J
|
♠QJ642
♥AJT6
♦KQ2
♣4
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ ♦3 ♥1 ♠2 NT5 |
EW: 3♦ 4♥ 5♠ ♣5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
650 2.00 2.00 4♠ E +1 1-Allen-Blonarwitz vs 3-Smith-Smith
650 2.00 2.00 4♠ E +1 2-Hayward-Attebury vs 5-Reed-Slade
650 2.00 2.00 4♠ E +1 3-Vaughan-Vaughan vs 2-Swanson-Alberts
650 2.00 2.00 4♠ E +1 4-Fallen-Stoa vs 4-Almy-Almy
650 2.00 2.00 4♠ E +1 5-Wagner-Hanson vs 1-Titcomb-Hubman
|
10 |
♠KJ92
♥QT4
♦AKT73
♣5
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
♠763
♥K8
♦94
♣KQ8742
|
♠AQ85
♥A75
♦J862
♣J9
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 2♥ ♣4 ♠6 NT6 |
EW: 3♣ 1♠ ♦5 ♥5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
140 4.00 0.00 3♥ S 1-Allen-Blonarwitz vs 4-Almy-Almy
110 2.50 1.50 2♥ S 3-Vaughan-Vaughan vs 3-Smith-Smith
110 2.50 1.50 2♥ S 5-Wagner-Hanson vs 2-Swanson-Alberts
120 0.50 3.50 2N W 4-Fallen-Stoa vs 5-Reed-Slade
120 0.50 3.50 2N E 2-Hayward-Attebury vs 1-Titcomb-Hubman
|
11 |
♠AT
♥AJ87
♦K943
♣642
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
♠QJ75
♥KT6532
♦Q7
♣5
|
♠9832
♥4
♦652
♣KJT83
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 6♦ 3♥ 3♠ 6NT |
EW: ♣2 ♦1 ♥4 ♠4 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
460 4.00 0.00 3N S +2 3-Vaughan-Vaughan vs 2-Swanson-Alberts
430 3.00 1.00 3N S +1 2-Hayward-Attebury vs 5-Reed-Slade
400 2.00 2.00 3N S 4-Fallen-Stoa vs 4-Almy-Almy
150 1.00 3.00 4♠ S -3 5-Wagner-Hanson vs 1-Titcomb-Hubman
200 0.00 4.00 5♥ S -4 1-Allen-Blonarwitz vs 3-Smith-Smith
|
12 |
♠8
♥KQ5
♦K763
♣T8743
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
♠9764
♥AJT932
♦85
♣K
|
♠AKJ2
♥74
♦JT942
♣AQ
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ ♦6 ♥4 ♠4 NT6 |
EW: 1♦ 2♥ 2♠ ♣4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
200 3.50 0.50 3N E -4 1-Allen-Blonarwitz vs 4-Almy-Almy
200 3.50 0.50 3N E -4 2-Hayward-Attebury vs 1-Titcomb-Hubman
50 2.00 2.00 4♥ W -1 4-Fallen-Stoa vs 5-Reed-Slade
110 1.00 3.00 2♥ W 5-Wagner-Hanson vs 2-Swanson-Alberts
140 0.00 4.00 2♥ W +1 3-Vaughan-Vaughan vs 3-Smith-Smith
|
13 |
♠AKJ754
♥K5
♦65
♣AQJ
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
♠32
♥Q976
♦Q73
♣K985
|
♠96
♥JT42
♦AKJ982
♣T
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 5♠ 1NT ♦5 ♥5 |
EW: 1♦ 2♥ ♣3 ♠1 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
650 2.50 1.50 4♠ N +1 1-Allen-Blonarwitz vs 3-Smith-Smith
650 2.50 1.50 4♠ N +1 3-Vaughan-Vaughan vs 2-Swanson-Alberts
650 2.50 1.50 4♠ N +1 4-Fallen-Stoa vs 4-Almy-Almy
650 2.50 1.50 4♠ N +1 5-Wagner-Hanson vs 1-Titcomb-Hubman
170 0.00 4.00 3♠ N +1 2-Hayward-Attebury vs 5-Reed-Slade
|
14 |
♠QT52
♥Q
♦T43
♣KQJ98
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
♠763
♥AT7532
♦J7
♣T3
|
♠K4
♥J64
♦AKQ9865
♣4
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 5♠ ♦4 ♥4 NT5 |
EW: 3♦ 2♥ ♣2 ♠2 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
480 4.00 0.00 4♠ N +2 4-Fallen-Stoa vs 4-Almy-Almy
200 3.00 1.00 3♠ N +2 5-Wagner-Hanson vs 1-Titcomb-Hubman
150 2.00 2.00 4♣ N +1 3-Vaughan-Vaughan vs 2-Swanson-Alberts
50 1.00 3.00 5♦ E -1 1-Allen-Blonarwitz vs 3-Smith-Smith
110 0.00 4.00 3♦ E 2-Hayward-Attebury vs 5-Reed-Slade
|
15 |
♠86
♥A9
♦AQJ9863
♣63
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
♠AJ7
♥KQ863
♦K7
♣Q42
|
♠KQT2
♥42
♦42
♣JT987
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♦ 1♥ 3NT ♣5 ♠6 |
EW: 2♣ 1♠ ♦3 ♥6 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
150 4.00 0.00 3♥ W -3 2-Hayward-Attebury vs 5-Reed-Slade
110 3.00 1.00 2♦ N +1 1-Allen-Blonarwitz vs 3-Smith-Smith
50 1.00 3.00 3♠ E -1 3-Vaughan-Vaughan vs 2-Swanson-Alberts
50 1.00 3.00 2♠ E -1 4-Fallen-Stoa vs 4-Almy-Almy
50 1.00 3.00 3♥ W -1 5-Wagner-Hanson vs 1-Titcomb-Hubman
|
16 |
♠J53
♥T87652
♦T3
♣A5
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
♠8742
♥KQ94
♦A7
♣KT9
|
♠QT6
♥AJ
♦KJ654
♣743
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♥ ♦6 ♠6 NT5 |
EW: 1♠ 2/1NT ♣6/5 ♦5 ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 3.50 0.50 2♥ W -1 3-Vaughan-Vaughan vs 1-Titcomb-Hubman
100 3.50 0.50 2♦ E -1 1-Allen-Blonarwitz vs 2-Swanson-Alberts
90 1.00 3.00 1N W 2-Hayward-Attebury vs 4-Almy-Almy
90 1.00 3.00 1N E 4-Fallen-Stoa vs 3-Smith-Smith
90 1.00 3.00 1N E 5-Wagner-Hanson vs 5-Reed-Slade
|
17 |
♠KQ853
♥4
♦JT2
♣A763
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
♠2
♥AQT92
♦Q83
♣JT85
|
♠A96
♥K853
♦AK54
♣92
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♠ ♣6 ♦2 ♥2 NT3 |
EW: 1♣ 5♦ 5♥ 4NT ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
200 3.00 1.00 3♥ W +2 2-Hayward-Attebury vs 4-Almy-Almy
200 3.00 1.00 3♥ W +2 3-Vaughan-Vaughan vs 1-Titcomb-Hubman
200 3.00 1.00 3♥ W +2 4-Fallen-Stoa vs 3-Smith-Smith
450 0.50 3.50 4♥ W +1 5-Wagner-Hanson vs 5-Reed-Slade
450 0.50 3.50 4♥ E +1 1-Allen-Blonarwitz vs 2-Swanson-Alberts
|
18 |
♠AQ4
♥Q8
♦J6
♣AJ9873
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
♠KJ8
♥AJ42
♦832
♣T54
|
♠95
♥973
♦AKQ54
♣Q62
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 1♥ 3♠ ♦5 NT5 |
EW: 1♦ 1NT ♣5 ♥6 ♠3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
130 4.00 0.00 3♣ N +1 3-Vaughan-Vaughan vs 1-Titcomb-Hubman
90 2.50 1.50 2♣ N 4-Fallen-Stoa vs 3-Smith-Smith
90 2.50 1.50 2♣ N 5-Wagner-Hanson vs 5-Reed-Slade
50 1.00 3.00 2♦ E -1 2-Hayward-Attebury vs 4-Almy-Almy
100 0.00 4.00 2♣ N -1 1-Allen-Blonarwitz vs 2-Swanson-Alberts
|
19 |
♠5
♥T84
♦A8654
♣9752
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
♠KJ62
♥AKJ97
♦-
♣KQ63
|
♠94
♥Q532
♦KJT93
♣JT
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4 ♦6 ♥2 ♠6 NT4 |
EW: 1♣ 1♦ 4♥ 1♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
140 4.00 0.00 3♥ W 5-Wagner-Hanson vs 5-Reed-Slade
170 2.50 1.50 3♥ W +1 1-Allen-Blonarwitz vs 2-Swanson-Alberts
170 2.50 1.50 3♥ W +1 4-Fallen-Stoa vs 3-Smith-Smith
620 0.50 3.50 4♥ W 2-Hayward-Attebury vs 4-Almy-Almy
620 0.50 3.50 4♥ W 3-Vaughan-Vaughan vs 1-Titcomb-Hubman
|
20 |
♠KQJ
♥AJT7
♦AQ865
♣4
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
♠94
♥6432
♦KT4
♣Q932
|
♠T852
♥K
♦J73
♣KJT65
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 6♦ 7♥ 6♠ 5NT |
EW: ♣6 ♦1 ♥0 ♠1 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
650 3.50 0.50 4♥ S +1 1-Allen-Blonarwitz vs 2-Swanson-Alberts
650 3.50 0.50 4♥ S +1 4-Fallen-Stoa vs 3-Smith-Smith
620 2.00 2.00 4♥ S 5-Wagner-Hanson vs 5-Reed-Slade
140 1.00 3.00 3♠ S 2-Hayward-Attebury vs 4-Almy-Almy
100 0.00 4.00 4♥ S -1 3-Vaughan-Vaughan vs 1-Titcomb-Hubman
|
21 |
♠Q63
♥4
♦AT9864
♣974
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
♠AT2
♥KQ8
♦K
♣AQJ632
|
♠KJ974
♥7632
♦Q752
♣-
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦6 ♥4 ♠3 NT3 |
EW: 2♣ 1♦ 3♥ 4♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
250 4.00 0.00 5♥ E -5 3-Vaughan-Vaughan vs 5-Reed-Slade
50 2.50 1.50 3N E -1 5-Wagner-Hanson vs 4-Almy-Almy
50 2.50 1.50 3♣ W -1 4-Fallen-Stoa vs 2-Swanson-Alberts
180 1.00 3.00 2N W +2 1-Allen-Blonarwitz vs 1-Titcomb-Hubman
400 0.00 4.00 3N W 2-Hayward-Attebury vs 3-Smith-Smith
|
22 |
♠A76
♥K6543
♦-
♣KT654
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
♠T98543
♥9
♦T
♣QJ987
|
♠KQ
♥JT
♦AQJ986542
♣-
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 6/5♥ 1/-♠ 4NT ♦4 ♠7/6 |
EW: 3♦ ♣4 ♥1 ♠6 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
500 4.00 0.00 5♦* E -2 1-Allen-Blonarwitz vs 1-Titcomb-Hubman
450 3.00 1.00 5♥ S 5-Wagner-Hanson vs 4-Almy-Almy
420 2.00 2.00 4♥ N 3-Vaughan-Vaughan vs 5-Reed-Slade
100 1.00 3.00 5♦ E -1 2-Hayward-Attebury vs 3-Smith-Smith
130 0.00 4.00 4♦ E 4-Fallen-Stoa vs 2-Swanson-Alberts
|
23 |
♠K874
♥AJ72
♦J
♣AK76
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
♠62
♥93
♦976543
♣T92
|
♠J3
♥KQT
♦AKT2
♣QJ85
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 4♥ 4♠ 1NT ♦5 |
EW: ♣6 ♦6 ♥3 ♠3 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
620 3.50 0.50 4♠ S 4-Fallen-Stoa vs 2-Swanson-Alberts
620 3.50 0.50 4♠ N 3-Vaughan-Vaughan vs 5-Reed-Slade
170 2.00 2.00 3♠ S +1 2-Hayward-Attebury vs 3-Smith-Smith
70 1.00 3.00 1♦ E 5-Wagner-Hanson vs 4-Almy-Almy
100 0.00 4.00 4♠ S -1 1-Allen-Blonarwitz vs 1-Titcomb-Hubman
|
24 |
♠AQ8
♥K5
♦QJT982
♣87
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
♠T965
♥T86
♦K
♣QJ953
|
♠J
♥J942
♦A7543
♣642
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 4♦ 3♥ 4♠ 4/5NT |
EW: ♣5 ♦2 ♥3 ♠2 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
460 3.50 0.50 3N S +2 2-Hayward-Attebury vs 3-Smith-Smith
460 3.50 0.50 3N S +2 3-Vaughan-Vaughan vs 5-Reed-Slade
420 2.00 2.00 4♠ S 4-Fallen-Stoa vs 2-Swanson-Alberts
400 1.00 3.00 3N S 1-Allen-Blonarwitz vs 1-Titcomb-Hubman
100 0.00 4.00 5♠ S -2 5-Wagner-Hanson vs 4-Almy-Almy
|
25 |
♠AK98
♥KJ84
♦53
♣KJ5
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
♠Q742
♥QT953
♦9
♣AQT
|
♠J65
♥A7
♦T64
♣86432
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♦ 1♥ 1♠ 4NT ♣6 |
EW: ♣6 ♦2 ♥5 ♠3 NT2/3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
460 3.00 1.00 3N N +2 1-Allen-Blonarwitz vs 1-Titcomb-Hubman
460 3.00 1.00 3N N +2 3-Vaughan-Vaughan vs 5-Reed-Slade
460 3.00 1.00 3N N +2 4-Fallen-Stoa vs 2-Swanson-Alberts
430 1.00 3.00 3N N +1 2-Hayward-Attebury vs 3-Smith-Smith
150 0.00 4.00 3♦ S +2 5-Wagner-Hanson vs 4-Almy-Almy
|