1 |
♠2
♥T6
♦AQT63
♣KQ875
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
♠KT8
♥AQJ52
♦8
♣AJ32
|
♠AQ9764
♥87
♦75
♣964
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ ♣5 ♥2/4 ♠2 NT3 |
EW: 1♣ 2/3♥ 5♠ 2NT ♦4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
130 4.00 0.00 4♦ N 2-Knowles-Coone vs 3-Lust-Lust
100 2.50 1.50 5♠* E -1 5-Lee-Sawyer vs 4-Barthels-Barthels
100 2.50 1.50 3♠ W -2 3-Gaunt-Kirkland vs 5-Wilhelmi-Greeley
100 1.00 3.00 5♦ N -2 1-Vaillancourt-Nordstrom vs 1-Howard-Enos
300 0.00 4.00 5♦* N -2 4-Scroggins-Brezel vs 2-Pan-Tu
|
2 |
♠KT3
♥JT54
♦5
♣Q8742
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
♠AQ875
♥7
♦8732
♣J63
|
♠J96
♥632
♦AT64
♣A95
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 1♦ 4♥ 1NT ♠6 |
EW: 1♠ ♣4 ♦6/4 ♥3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
650 3.00 1.00 4♥ S +1 1-Vaillancourt-Nordstrom vs 1-Howard-Enos
650 3.00 1.00 4♥ S +1 2-Knowles-Coone vs 3-Lust-Lust
650 3.00 1.00 4♥ S +1 4-Scroggins-Brezel vs 2-Pan-Tu
620 1.00 3.00 4♥ S 5-Lee-Sawyer vs 4-Barthels-Barthels
100 0.00 4.00 3♠ W -2 3-Gaunt-Kirkland vs 5-Wilhelmi-Greeley
|
3 |
♠A742
♥J9863
♦643
♣4
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
♠K
♥KQ542
♦A82
♣T862
|
♠JT86
♥7
♦K97
♣KQJ97
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♠ ♣3 ♦6 ♥6 NT5 |
EW: 4♣ 1♥ 1NT ♦6 ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 4.00 0.00 2N W -1 4-Scroggins-Brezel vs 2-Pan-Tu
50 3.00 1.00 2♦ S -1 5-Lee-Sawyer vs 4-Barthels-Barthels
110 2.00 2.00 3♣ E 3-Gaunt-Kirkland vs 5-Wilhelmi-Greeley
130 0.50 3.50 3♣ W +1 1-Vaillancourt-Nordstrom vs 1-Howard-Enos
130 0.50 3.50 3♣ E +1 2-Knowles-Coone vs 3-Lust-Lust
|
4 |
♠Q86
♥T743
♦Q4
♣QJT2
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
♠KT953
♥J962
♦A5
♣86
|
♠2
♥Q5
♦T987632
♣K93
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3/4♣ 4♥ 3♠ 4NT ♦6 |
EW: 1/-♦ ♣4/3 ♦7/6 ♥3 ♠4 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
660 4.00 0.00 3N S +2 2-Knowles-Coone vs 3-Lust-Lust
600 3.00 1.00 3N S 3-Gaunt-Kirkland vs 5-Wilhelmi-Greeley
110 2.00 2.00 2♥ N 5-Lee-Sawyer vs 4-Barthels-Barthels
200 1.00 3.00 3♥ N -2 1-Vaillancourt-Nordstrom vs 1-Howard-Enos
300 0.00 4.00 3N S -3 4-Scroggins-Brezel vs 2-Pan-Tu
|
5 |
♠T943
♥QT5
♦A54
♣743
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
♠KQ86
♥K96
♦62
♣AJT9
|
♠AJ5
♥72
♦QJ83
♣KQ86
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ ♣3 ♦6 ♠3 NT4 |
EW: 4♣ 1♦ 3♠ 3NT ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
400 3.00 1.00 3N W 1-Vaillancourt-Nordstrom vs 1-Howard-Enos
400 3.00 1.00 3N W 5-Lee-Sawyer vs 4-Barthels-Barthels
400 3.00 1.00 3N E 3-Gaunt-Kirkland vs 5-Wilhelmi-Greeley
420 1.00 3.00 4♠ W 2-Knowles-Coone vs 3-Lust-Lust
430 0.00 4.00 3N E +1 4-Scroggins-Brezel vs 2-Pan-Tu
|
6 |
♠93
♥J853
♦QT7
♣K732
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
♠AJT7
♥AKQ42
♦83
♣T4
|
♠865
♥T96
♦K952
♣AJ5
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 1♦ ♥5 ♠5 NT5/6 |
EW: 2♥ 2/1♠ 1NT ♣5 ♦6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 3.50 0.50 3♥ W -1 4-Scroggins-Brezel vs 1-Howard-Enos
100 3.50 0.50 2♥ W -1 3-Gaunt-Kirkland vs 4-Barthels-Barthels
50 2.00 2.00 2♣ S -1 5-Lee-Sawyer vs 3-Lust-Lust
110 1.00 3.00 2♥ W 2-Knowles-Coone vs 2-Pan-Tu
140 0.00 4.00 2♥ W +1 1-Vaillancourt-Nordstrom vs 5-Wilhelmi-Greeley
|
7 |
♠K
♥AJ98
♦AQ42
♣QT75
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
♠T98642
♥T64
♦6
♣K43
|
♠AQ75
♥K5
♦KJ753
♣A9
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♥ ♦4 ♠2 NT3 |
EW: 2♦ 5♠ 3NT ♣6 ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 4.00 0.00 2♦ E -1 5-Lee-Sawyer vs 3-Lust-Lust
200 2.00 2.00 3♠ E +2 2-Knowles-Coone vs 2-Pan-Tu
200 2.00 2.00 2♠ E +3 4-Scroggins-Brezel vs 1-Howard-Enos
200 2.00 2.00 1♦ N -2 3-Gaunt-Kirkland vs 4-Barthels-Barthels
650 0.00 4.00 4♠ W +1 1-Vaillancourt-Nordstrom vs 5-Wilhelmi-Greeley
|
8 |
♠Q42
♥AT
♦JT64
♣KQJT
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
♠JT6
♥7
♦AQ85
♣A8432
|
♠AK7
♥Q8532
♦7
♣9765
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1NT ♣4 ♦6 ♥6 ♠6 |
EW: 3/2♣ 1/-♦ 1♥ 1♠ ♦7/6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
800 4.00 0.00 4♣* W -4 2-Knowles-Coone vs 2-Pan-Tu
110 3.00 1.00 2♦ S +1 3-Gaunt-Kirkland vs 4-Barthels-Barthels
50 2.00 2.00 3N W -1 4-Scroggins-Brezel vs 1-Howard-Enos
50 1.00 3.00 3♦ N -1 5-Lee-Sawyer vs 3-Lust-Lust
110 0.00 4.00 3♣ W 1-Vaillancourt-Nordstrom vs 5-Wilhelmi-Greeley
|
9 |
♠32
♥AJ
♦K975
♣AT972
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
♠KJ8
♥K92
♦AJT2
♣Q85
|
♠A954
♥T87654
♦Q
♣K3
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6 ♦5 ♥3 ♠4 NT3/4 |
EW: 1♣ 2♦ 4♥ 3♠ 2NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 4.00 0.00 3♦ N -2 3-Gaunt-Kirkland vs 4-Barthels-Barthels
110 3.00 1.00 2♥ E 4-Scroggins-Brezel vs 1-Howard-Enos
140 2.00 2.00 2♥ E +1 2-Knowles-Coone vs 2-Pan-Tu
170 1.00 3.00 3♥ E +1 1-Vaillancourt-Nordstrom vs 5-Wilhelmi-Greeley
200 0.00 4.00 2♥ E +3 5-Lee-Sawyer vs 3-Lust-Lust
|
10 |
♠A754
♥-
♦KT9
♣AQ9532
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
♠2
♥JT732
♦Q7653
♣74
|
♠KT
♥A984
♦J42
♣KT86
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 1♦ 1♥ 6♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦6 ♥6 ♠1 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
680 3.50 0.50 5♠ S +1 1-Vaillancourt-Nordstrom vs 5-Wilhelmi-Greeley
680 3.50 0.50 5♠ S +1 2-Knowles-Coone vs 2-Pan-Tu
650 2.00 2.00 5♠ S 4-Scroggins-Brezel vs 1-Howard-Enos
100 0.50 3.50 6♠ S -1 3-Gaunt-Kirkland vs 4-Barthels-Barthels
100 0.50 3.50 6♠ S -1 5-Lee-Sawyer vs 3-Lust-Lust
|
11 |
♠3
♥KT632
♦83
♣K9642
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
♠T98
♥AQ97
♦QT652
♣Q
|
♠AK752
♥J4
♦A4
♣JT53
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ ♦5 ♥6 ♠4 NT6 |
EW: 2♦ -/1♥ 2♠ 1NT ♣6 ♥6/7 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 4.00 0.00 3♠ W -2 2-Knowles-Coone vs 1-Howard-Enos
50 3.00 1.00 3♠ E -1 3-Gaunt-Kirkland vs 3-Lust-Lust
110 2.00 2.00 2♠ E 4-Scroggins-Brezel vs 5-Wilhelmi-Greeley
120 1.00 3.00 2N E 5-Lee-Sawyer vs 2-Pan-Tu
140 0.00 4.00 2♠ E +1 1-Vaillancourt-Nordstrom vs 4-Barthels-Barthels
|
12 |
♠843
♥K85
♦AKJ6
♣AJ2
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
♠Q52
♥QT7
♦98
♣KQ643
|
♠AKJT9
♥J2
♦T74
♣T85
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ 3♥ 1NT ♣6 ♠6 |
EW: 1♣ 1♠ ♦3 ♥4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
140 2.50 1.50 3♥ N 4-Scroggins-Brezel vs 5-Wilhelmi-Greeley
140 2.50 1.50 2♥ N +1 2-Knowles-Coone vs 1-Howard-Enos
140 2.50 1.50 2♥ N +1 3-Gaunt-Kirkland vs 3-Lust-Lust
140 2.50 1.50 2♥ N +1 5-Lee-Sawyer vs 2-Pan-Tu
110 0.00 4.00 2♠ E 1-Vaillancourt-Nordstrom vs 4-Barthels-Barthels
|
13 |
♠AQT
♥A82
♦KT975
♣AJ
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
♠8764
♥QJ3
♦AQ42
♣KT
|
♠KJ52
♥95
♦J8
♣Q9642
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♦ 3♥ 1/-NT ♠6/5 NT7/6 |
EW: 1♠ ♣6 ♦6 ♥4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
170 4.00 0.00 2♥ N +2 5-Lee-Sawyer vs 2-Pan-Tu
120 3.00 1.00 2N N 4-Scroggins-Brezel vs 5-Wilhelmi-Greeley
110 2.00 2.00 1♦ N +2 1-Vaillancourt-Nordstrom vs 4-Barthels-Barthels
100 1.00 3.00 2♠ E -1 2-Knowles-Coone vs 1-Howard-Enos
200 0.00 4.00 2♦ N -2 3-Gaunt-Kirkland vs 3-Lust-Lust
|
14 |
♠AJ73
♥JT4
♦T643
♣JT
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
♠Q54
♥K2
♦A87
♣K7642
|
♠KT98
♥AQ96
♦J52
♣Q9
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4 ♦5 ♥4 ♠4 NT4 |
EW: 3♣ 2♦ 3♥ 3♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
50 3.50 0.50 3N E -1 4-Scroggins-Brezel vs 5-Wilhelmi-Greeley
50 3.50 0.50 3N E -1 5-Lee-Sawyer vs 2-Pan-Tu
90 2.00 2.00 1N W 3-Gaunt-Kirkland vs 3-Lust-Lust
140 1.00 3.00 2♠ E +1 2-Knowles-Coone vs 1-Howard-Enos
150 0.00 4.00 2N W +1 1-Vaillancourt-Nordstrom vs 4-Barthels-Barthels
|
15 |
♠-
♥AK9532
♦J9653
♣AJ
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
♠QT3
♥J8
♦QT742
♣963
|
♠J94
♥76
♦AK
♣KT8542
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2/1♦ 6♥ 5/4♠ 3NT ♣6 |
EW: ♣6 ♦5 ♥0 ♠2 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
650 3.00 1.00 4♠ S +1 3-Gaunt-Kirkland vs 3-Lust-Lust
650 3.00 1.00 4♥ N +1 4-Scroggins-Brezel vs 5-Wilhelmi-Greeley
650 3.00 1.00 4♥ N +1 5-Lee-Sawyer vs 2-Pan-Tu
620 1.00 3.00 4♠ S 2-Knowles-Coone vs 1-Howard-Enos
100 0.00 4.00 6♥ N -1 1-Vaillancourt-Nordstrom vs 4-Barthels-Barthels
|
16 |
♠K8
♥J92
♦T7632
♣AKJ
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
♠J63
♥QT53
♦Q5
♣T862
|
♠T754
♥86
♦A84
♣Q954
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 5♦ 4♥ 4/3♠ 5/3NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦2 ♥3 ♠3 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
460 2.50 1.50 3N N +2 1-Vaillancourt-Nordstrom vs 3-Lust-Lust
460 2.50 1.50 3N N +2 2-Knowles-Coone vs 5-Wilhelmi-Greeley
460 2.50 1.50 3N N +2 4-Scroggins-Brezel vs 4-Barthels-Barthels
460 2.50 1.50 3N N +2 5-Lee-Sawyer vs 1-Howard-Enos
420 0.00 4.00 4♥ S 3-Gaunt-Kirkland vs 2-Pan-Tu
|
17 |
♠KJ8
♥A853
♦J98
♣J94
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
♠732
♥K6
♦KQT432
♣A5
|
♠Q954
♥QT42
♦A5
♣QT8
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ ♦4 ♥5 ♠5 NT5 |
EW: 3♦ 1♥ 2♠ 2NT ♣6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
110 4.00 0.00 2♦ W +1 2-Knowles-Coone vs 5-Wilhelmi-Greeley
150 2.00 2.00 2N E +1 3-Gaunt-Kirkland vs 2-Pan-Tu
150 2.00 2.00 2N E +1 4-Scroggins-Brezel vs 4-Barthels-Barthels
150 2.00 2.00 2N E +1 5-Lee-Sawyer vs 1-Howard-Enos
430 0.00 4.00 3N E +1 1-Vaillancourt-Nordstrom vs 3-Lust-Lust
|
18 |
♠K973
♥AJT2
♦KJT8
♣5
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
♠QJ42
♥KQ63
♦Q3
♣862
|
♠5
♥985
♦A7652
♣KQJ7
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 2♦ 1/2♥ 4♠ 2NT |
EW: ♣5 ♦5 ♥5 ♠3 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
500 4.00 0.00 3♣* E -3 3-Gaunt-Kirkland vs 2-Pan-Tu
140 2.50 1.50 2♠ S +1 2-Knowles-Coone vs 5-Wilhelmi-Greeley
140 2.50 1.50 2♠ S +1 5-Lee-Sawyer vs 1-Howard-Enos
110 1.00 3.00 2♠ S 4-Scroggins-Brezel vs 4-Barthels-Barthels
50 0.00 4.00 2♣ E -1 1-Vaillancourt-Nordstrom vs 3-Lust-Lust
|
19 |
♠6532
♥T2
♦A7432
♣T5
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
♠Q84
♥A6
♦JT9865
♣A9
|
♠AJ7
♥K8
♦K
♣J876432
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♥ ♣2 ♦3 ♠4 NT2 |
EW: 4♣ 4♦ 3♠ 4NT ♥5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
140 4.00 0.00 3♥ S 2-Knowles-Coone vs 5-Wilhelmi-Greeley
50 2.50 1.50 3♥ S -1 1-Vaillancourt-Nordstrom vs 3-Lust-Lust
50 2.50 1.50 3♥ S -1 5-Lee-Sawyer vs 1-Howard-Enos
600 1.00 3.00 3N E 3-Gaunt-Kirkland vs 2-Pan-Tu
620 0.00 4.00 5♣ E +1 4-Scroggins-Brezel vs 4-Barthels-Barthels
|
20 |
♠72
♥QT9
♦964
♣A8732
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
♠A6
♥A3
♦QT53
♣QJT64
|
♠KQJT5
♥K65
♦AK87
♣K
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣2 ♦1 ♥4 ♠1 NT1 |
EW: 5♣ 6♦ 3♥ 6♠ 6NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
170 4.00 0.00 2♦ W +4 3-Gaunt-Kirkland vs 2-Pan-Tu
690 3.00 1.00 4N W +2 2-Knowles-Coone vs 5-Wilhelmi-Greeley
720 2.00 2.00 3N E +4 4-Scroggins-Brezel vs 4-Barthels-Barthels
1440 1.00 3.00 6N W 5-Lee-Sawyer vs 1-Howard-Enos
1470 0.00 4.00 6N E +1 1-Vaillancourt-Nordstrom vs 3-Lust-Lust
|
21 |
♠KQ72
♥A9
♦953
♣AQ98
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
♠A93
♥T76
♦T82
♣K652
|
♠JT85
♥KQ5
♦AKJ6
♣73
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 2♥ 1NT ♦6 ♠6 |
EW: -/1♦ -/1♠ ♣5 ♦6/7 ♥5 ♠6/7 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
110 2.50 1.50 2♥ N 2-Knowles-Coone vs 4-Barthels-Barthels
110 2.50 1.50 2♥ N 3-Gaunt-Kirkland vs 1-Howard-Enos
110 2.50 1.50 2♥ N 4-Scroggins-Brezel vs 3-Lust-Lust
110 2.50 1.50 2♥ N 5-Lee-Sawyer vs 5-Wilhelmi-Greeley
100 0.00 4.00 2♥ N -1 1-Vaillancourt-Nordstrom vs 2-Pan-Tu
|
22 |
♠4
♥7
♦AJT854
♣J7643
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
♠AKT53
♥985
♦763
♣T8
|
♠962
♥KJT
♦Q92
♣AQ95
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 2♦ 1♥ ♠5 NT5 |
EW: 1/-♠ 1/-NT ♣4 ♦4/2 ♥6/5 ♠7/6 NT7/6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
200 3.50 0.50 3N E -2 1-Vaillancourt-Nordstrom vs 2-Pan-Tu
200 3.50 0.50 2♠ W -2 3-Gaunt-Kirkland vs 1-Howard-Enos
140 2.00 2.00 3♥ S 2-Knowles-Coone vs 4-Barthels-Barthels
100 1.00 3.00 5♦ N -2 5-Lee-Sawyer vs 5-Wilhelmi-Greeley
150 0.00 4.00 3N S -3 4-Scroggins-Brezel vs 3-Lust-Lust
|
23 |
♠KQ93
♥T9
♦K972
♣AQ2
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
♠T42
♥KQJ4
♦QJ83
♣63
|
♠87
♥87532
♦T6
♣JT85
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 4♦ 1♥ 5♠ 4NT |
EW: ♣3 ♦3 ♥6 ♠1 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
680 4.00 0.00 4♠ S +2 2-Knowles-Coone vs 4-Barthels-Barthels
650 2.00 2.00 4♠ S +1 3-Gaunt-Kirkland vs 1-Howard-Enos
650 2.00 2.00 4♠ S +1 4-Scroggins-Brezel vs 3-Lust-Lust
650 2.00 2.00 4♠ S +1 5-Lee-Sawyer vs 5-Wilhelmi-Greeley
630 0.00 4.00 3N S +1 1-Vaillancourt-Nordstrom vs 2-Pan-Tu
|
24 |
♠75
♥987532
♦653
♣J7
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
♠AJT32
♥KJT
♦T742
♣2
|
♠Q6
♥Q6
♦KQJ8
♣KQ843
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6 ♦3 ♥6 ♠4 NT4 |
EW: 1♣ 4♦ 1♥ 3♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 4.00 0.00 3♥ S -2 3-Gaunt-Kirkland vs 1-Howard-Enos
110 3.00 1.00 2♠ W 2-Knowles-Coone vs 4-Barthels-Barthels
140 1.50 2.50 2♠ W +1 4-Scroggins-Brezel vs 3-Lust-Lust
140 1.50 2.50 2♠ W +1 5-Lee-Sawyer vs 5-Wilhelmi-Greeley
170 0.00 4.00 3♠ E +1 1-Vaillancourt-Nordstrom vs 2-Pan-Tu
|
25 |
♠763
♥AK9863
♦Q5
♣92
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
♠KJT
♥QT2
♦AKT6
♣Q43
|
♠Q542
♥J4
♦873
♣AKT8
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4 ♦5 ♥6 ♠4 NT3 |
EW: 3♣ 2♦ 1♥ 3♠ 1NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
200 4.00 0.00 3N W -2 2-Knowles-Coone vs 4-Barthels-Barthels
50 3.00 1.00 2♥ N -1 5-Lee-Sawyer vs 5-Wilhelmi-Greeley
170 2.00 2.00 2♠ E +2 4-Scroggins-Brezel vs 3-Lust-Lust
600 1.00 3.00 3N W 3-Gaunt-Kirkland vs 1-Howard-Enos
630 0.00 4.00 3N W +1 1-Vaillancourt-Nordstrom vs 2-Pan-Tu
|