1 |
♠8754
♥A873
♦Q42
♣87
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
♠K9
♥KQJ96
♦A753
♣A4
|
♠A63
♥T
♦JT8
♣KQJ965
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣1 ♦3 ♥1 ♠4 NT1 |
EW: 5♣ 4♦ 5♥ 2/3♠ 5NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
400 7.00 0.00 3N E 5-Nickerson-Bowlen vs 8-Cates-Krout
460 5.50 1.50 3N E +2 8-Jensen-McEvoy vs 5-Cecchi-Boyson
460 5.50 1.50 3N E +2 10-Flannigan-Traquair vs 9-Monro-Monro
480 4.00 3.00 4♥ W +2 4-Binsted-Strachan vs 6-Neilsen-Neilsen
490 1.50 5.50 3N W +3 1-Antonsen-Wood vs 1-Bannatyne-Hansen
490 1.50 5.50 3N E +3 6-Haley-Catherall vs 10-Paul-Schramm
490 1.50 5.50 3N E +3 7-Arnot-Landry vs 3-Blackburn-Senaratne
490 1.50 5.50 3N E +3 9-Pollhammer-Fraser vs 7-Johansen-Wanless
|
2 |
♠QT852
♥JT972
♦-
♣A82
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
♠9
♥AK63
♦643
♣JT754
|
♠AKJ643
♥54
♦87
♣963
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♦ 1♥ 2NT ♣5 ♠6 |
EW: 1/2♣ 1♠ ♦3 ♥4 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
690 7.00 0.00 3N N +3 8-Jensen-McEvoy vs 5-Cecchi-Boyson
660 6.00 1.00 3N S +2 5-Nickerson-Bowlen vs 8-Cates-Krout
130 4.00 3.00 4♦ S 9-Pollhammer-Fraser vs 7-Johansen-Wanless
130 4.00 3.00 3♦ S +1 1-Antonsen-Wood vs 1-Bannatyne-Hansen
130 4.00 3.00 3♦ S +1 7-Arnot-Landry vs 3-Blackburn-Senaratne
110 1.50 5.50 3♦ S 4-Binsted-Strachan vs 6-Neilsen-Neilsen
110 1.50 5.50 3♦ S 6-Haley-Catherall vs 10-Paul-Schramm
200 0.00 7.00 5♦ S -2 10-Flannigan-Traquair vs 9-Monro-Monro
|
3 |
♠A86432
♥J2
♦KQ8
♣83
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
♠QT95
♥764
♦T97
♣T62
|
♠J7
♥AKT853
♦J3
♣AK7
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 3♦ 1♠ ♥4 NT5 |
EW: 2♥ ♣3 ♦3 ♠5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 7.00 0.00 3♥ E -1 8-Jensen-McEvoy vs 5-Cecchi-Boyson
50 6.00 1.00 4♦ S -1 7-Arnot-Landry vs 3-Blackburn-Senaratne
100 3.00 4.00 3♠ N -2 1-Antonsen-Wood vs 1-Bannatyne-Hansen
100 3.00 4.00 3♠ N -2 4-Binsted-Strachan vs 6-Neilsen-Neilsen
100 3.00 4.00 3♠ N -2 6-Haley-Catherall vs 10-Paul-Schramm
100 3.00 4.00 2♠ N -2 5-Nickerson-Bowlen vs 8-Cates-Krout
100 3.00 4.00 5♦ S -2 9-Pollhammer-Fraser vs 7-Johansen-Wanless
140 0.00 7.00 3♥ E 10-Flannigan-Traquair vs 9-Monro-Monro
|
4 |
♠K32
♥Q42
♦A62
♣QT64
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
♠A
♥T9
♦KQT87
♣AK982
|
♠9654
♥K8763
♦J543
♣-
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♠ ♦3 ♥5 NT6 |
EW: 4♦ 2♥ ♣5 ♠5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
500 7.00 0.00 5♦* W -2 8-Jensen-McEvoy vs 4-Osborne-Wilson
200 6.00 1.00 5♦ E -2 1-Antonsen-Wood vs 10-Paul-Schramm
140 5.00 2.00 3♠ S 5-Nickerson-Bowlen vs 7-Johansen-Wanless
100 4.00 3.00 4♦ W -1 9-Pollhammer-Fraser vs 6-Neilsen-Neilsen
110 3.00 4.00 3♦ W 6-Haley-Catherall vs 9-Monro-Monro
130 1.50 5.50 3♦ W +1 7-Arnot-Landry vs 1-Bannatyne-Hansen
130 1.50 5.50 3♦ W +1 10-Flannigan-Traquair vs 8-Cates-Krout
200 0.00 7.00 4♠ S -2 2-Kostrinsky-Walker vs 2-Friedman-Usher
|
5 |
♠764
♥Q653
♦K32
♣864
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
♠AQ52
♥K
♦QT865
♣J32
|
♠K983
♥J9
♦AJ974
♣K9
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 4♥ ♦3 ♠3 NT4 |
EW: 4♦ 4/3♠ ♣3 ♥3 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
50 7.00 0.00 4♠ W -1 6-Haley-Catherall vs 9-Monro-Monro
110 6.00 1.00 3♦ E 10-Flannigan-Traquair vs 8-Cates-Krout
170 5.00 2.00 2♠ W +2 8-Jensen-McEvoy vs 4-Osborne-Wilson
400 4.00 3.00 5♦ E 2-Kostrinsky-Walker vs 2-Friedman-Usher
420 2.00 5.00 4♠ W 1-Antonsen-Wood vs 10-Paul-Schramm
420 2.00 5.00 4♠ W 9-Pollhammer-Fraser vs 6-Neilsen-Neilsen
420 2.00 5.00 4♠ E 7-Arnot-Landry vs 1-Bannatyne-Hansen
550 0.00 7.00 5♦* E 5-Nickerson-Bowlen vs 7-Johansen-Wanless
|
6 |
♠743
♥J432
♦K97
♣732
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
♠AKJ
♥AK976
♦JT2
♣QT
|
♠T85
♥Q8
♦AQ3
♣KJ964
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣1 ♦2 ♥2 ♠2 NT1 |
EW: 6♣ 5♦ 5♥ 5♠ 6NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
200 7.00 0.00 6♥ W -2 2-Kostrinsky-Walker vs 2-Friedman-Usher
630 6.00 1.00 3N E +1 10-Flannigan-Traquair vs 8-Cates-Krout
660 5.00 2.00 3N E +2 5-Nickerson-Bowlen vs 7-Johansen-Wanless
690 2.50 4.50 5N E +1 1-Antonsen-Wood vs 10-Paul-Schramm
690 2.50 4.50 3N W +3 7-Arnot-Landry vs 1-Bannatyne-Hansen
690 2.50 4.50 3N W +3 8-Jensen-McEvoy vs 4-Osborne-Wilson
690 2.50 4.50 3N E +3 9-Pollhammer-Fraser vs 6-Neilsen-Neilsen
1440 0.00 7.00 6N E 6-Haley-Catherall vs 9-Monro-Monro
|
7 |
♠AQ98
♥QJ742
♦95
♣QJ
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
♠K654
♥9
♦AKJ2
♣K763
|
♠3
♥AK863
♦T7643
♣T8
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♠ ♦3 ♥5 NT5 |
EW: 4♦ 2♥ 2NT ♣6 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 7.00 0.00 3♠ N -1 1-Antonsen-Wood vs 9-Monro-Monro
110 6.00 1.00 2♦ W +1 2-Kostrinsky-Walker vs 1-Bannatyne-Hansen
130 3.50 3.50 3♦ W +1 6-Haley-Catherall vs 8-Cates-Krout
130 3.50 3.50 3♦ W +1 8-Jensen-McEvoy vs 2-Friedman-Usher
130 3.50 3.50 3♦ W +1 9-Pollhammer-Fraser vs 5-Cecchi-Boyson
130 3.50 3.50 3♦ W +1 10-Flannigan-Traquair vs 7-Johansen-Wanless
150 0.50 6.50 4♦ W +1 7-Arnot-Landry vs 10-Paul-Schramm
150 0.50 6.50 3♦ E +2 3-Gibson-Beall vs 3-Blackburn-Senaratne
|
8 |
♠KJT95
♥AT3
♦K6
♣Q93
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
♠84
♥QJ62
♦Q8
♣AKJ87
|
♠AQ6
♥954
♦A72
♣T642
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ -/1♠ ♣4 ♥4/5 ♠6/7 NT5 |
EW: 3♣ 1/2♥ 1NT ♦5/6 ♠5/6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
530 7.00 0.00 3♠* N 1-Antonsen-Wood vs 9-Monro-Monro
100 5.50 1.50 3N E -2 3-Gibson-Beall vs 3-Blackburn-Senaratne
100 5.50 1.50 4♣ W -2 6-Haley-Catherall vs 8-Cates-Krout
50 3.50 3.50 4♣ W -1 2-Kostrinsky-Walker vs 1-Bannatyne-Hansen
50 3.50 3.50 3♣ W -1 8-Jensen-McEvoy vs 2-Friedman-Usher
100 2.00 5.00 3♠* N -1 9-Pollhammer-Fraser vs 5-Cecchi-Boyson
110 1.00 6.00 2♣ W +1 7-Arnot-Landry vs 10-Paul-Schramm
130 0.00 7.00 4♣ W 10-Flannigan-Traquair vs 7-Johansen-Wanless
|
9 |
♠J654
♥T5
♦753
♣J962
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
♠AK93
♥K84
♦T
♣T7543
|
♠Q8
♥AQJ76
♦K42
♣AQ8
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣2 ♦6 ♥1 ♠3 NT2 |
EW: 5♣ 1♦ 6♥ 4♠ 5NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 6.50 0.50 5♥ E -1 1-Antonsen-Wood vs 9-Monro-Monro
100 6.50 0.50 4♥ E -1 7-Arnot-Landry vs 10-Paul-Schramm
620 3.50 3.50 4♠ W 2-Kostrinsky-Walker vs 1-Bannatyne-Hansen
620 3.50 3.50 4♥ E 3-Gibson-Beall vs 3-Blackburn-Senaratne
620 3.50 3.50 4♥ E 6-Haley-Catherall vs 8-Cates-Krout
620 3.50 3.50 4♥ E 10-Flannigan-Traquair vs 7-Johansen-Wanless
650 1.00 6.00 4♥ E +1 8-Jensen-McEvoy vs 2-Friedman-Usher
660 0.00 7.00 3N E +2 9-Pollhammer-Fraser vs 5-Cecchi-Boyson
|
10 |
♠Q9754
♥K2
♦A72
♣Q54
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
♠J32
♥AJ865
♦KT
♣K72
|
♠KT8
♥Q7
♦Q9854
♣963
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♠ ♦6 ♥5/6 NT6 |
EW: 1♦ 1♥ 1NT ♣5 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
140 7.00 0.00 1♠ N +2 1-Antonsen-Wood vs 8-Cates-Krout
100 5.50 1.50 1N E -1 7-Arnot-Landry vs 9-Monro-Monro
100 5.50 1.50 2♥ W -1 8-Jensen-McEvoy vs 1-Bannatyne-Hansen
100 2.50 4.50 2N S -1 2-Kostrinsky-Walker vs 10-Paul-Schramm
100 2.50 4.50 2♠ N -1 10-Flannigan-Traquair vs 6-Neilsen-Neilsen
100 2.50 4.50 2♣ S -1 4-Binsted-Strachan vs 4-Osborne-Wilson
100 2.50 4.50 2♣ S -1 9-Pollhammer-Fraser vs 3-Blackburn-Senaratne
120 0.00 7.00 1N E +1 3-Gibson-Beall vs 2-Friedman-Usher
|
11 |
♠KJT963
♥Q9
♦T5
♣872
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
♠75
♥653
♦KQ96432
♣T
|
♠84
♥AK7
♦AJ8
♣KJ965
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ 3♠ ♣5 ♦3 NT4 |
EW: 2♣ 4♦ ♥6 ♠3 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
450 7.00 0.00 4♠ N +1 1-Antonsen-Wood vs 8-Cates-Krout
420 6.00 1.00 4♠ N 10-Flannigan-Traquair vs 6-Neilsen-Neilsen
300 5.00 2.00 5♦* W -2 7-Arnot-Landry vs 9-Monro-Monro
150 4.00 3.00 4♣ E -3 2-Kostrinsky-Walker vs 10-Paul-Schramm
140 3.00 4.00 2♠ N +1 8-Jensen-McEvoy vs 1-Bannatyne-Hansen
100 2.00 5.00 5♦ W -2 4-Binsted-Strachan vs 4-Osborne-Wilson
50 1.00 6.00 5♦ W -1 9-Pollhammer-Fraser vs 3-Blackburn-Senaratne
130 0.00 7.00 4♦ W 3-Gibson-Beall vs 2-Friedman-Usher
|
12 |
♠AKQ85
♥AQT64
♦752
♣-
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
♠T6432
♥82
♦T96
♣653
|
♠-
♥KJ53
♦KQJ4
♣KQ984
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1/-♣ 2♦ 3♥ 3♠ 3/2NT ♣7/6 |
EW: ♣6 ♦5 ♥3 ♠3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
620 6.50 0.50 4♠ N 3-Gibson-Beall vs 2-Friedman-Usher
620 6.50 0.50 4♠ N 4-Binsted-Strachan vs 4-Osborne-Wilson
140 5.00 2.00 3♠ N 7-Arnot-Landry vs 9-Monro-Monro
100 3.50 3.50 4♠ N -1 8-Jensen-McEvoy vs 1-Bannatyne-Hansen
100 3.50 3.50 4♠ N -1 10-Flannigan-Traquair vs 6-Neilsen-Neilsen
200 2.00 5.00 4♠ N -2 1-Antonsen-Wood vs 8-Cates-Krout
500 1.00 6.00 4♠* N -2 2-Kostrinsky-Walker vs 10-Paul-Schramm
1100 0.00 7.00 6♠* N -4 9-Pollhammer-Fraser vs 3-Blackburn-Senaratne
|
13 |
♠Q9
♥J93
♦AK972
♣A65
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
♠JT6
♥KQ842
♦T5
♣KQ2
|
♠8543
♥A75
♦43
♣JT93
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♦ 2♠ 2NT ♣6 ♥6 |
EW: ♣6 ♦3 ♥6 ♠4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
130 3.50 3.50 4♦ N 2-Kostrinsky-Walker vs 9-Monro-Monro
130 3.50 3.50 3♦ S +1 1-Antonsen-Wood vs 7-Johansen-Wanless
130 3.50 3.50 3♦ N +1 3-Gibson-Beall vs 1-Bannatyne-Hansen
130 3.50 3.50 3♦ N +1 4-Binsted-Strachan vs 3-Blackburn-Senaratne
130 3.50 3.50 3♦ N +1 5-Nickerson-Bowlen vs 5-Cecchi-Boyson
130 3.50 3.50 3♦ N +1 9-Pollhammer-Fraser vs 2-Friedman-Usher
130 3.50 3.50 3♦ N +1 10-Flannigan-Traquair vs 4-Osborne-Wilson
130 3.50 3.50 2♦ N +2 8-Jensen-McEvoy vs 10-Paul-Schramm
|
14 |
♠9843
♥QJ
♦853
♣KT72
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
♠K
♥AT94
♦K7
♣AQJ843
|
♠A75
♥8752
♦AT62
♣65
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♠ ♣4 ♦5 ♥3 NT4 |
EW: 3♣ 2/1♦ 4♥ 2NT ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
50 6.50 0.50 4♥ E -1 5-Nickerson-Bowlen vs 5-Cecchi-Boyson
50 6.50 0.50 4♥ E -1 9-Pollhammer-Fraser vs 2-Friedman-Usher
110 5.00 2.00 3♣ W 2-Kostrinsky-Walker vs 9-Monro-Monro
140 4.00 3.00 3♥ E 3-Gibson-Beall vs 1-Bannatyne-Hansen
170 3.00 4.00 2♥ E +2 8-Jensen-McEvoy vs 10-Paul-Schramm
420 1.00 6.00 4♥ W 1-Antonsen-Wood vs 7-Johansen-Wanless
420 1.00 6.00 4♥ W 4-Binsted-Strachan vs 3-Blackburn-Senaratne
420 1.00 6.00 4♥ E 10-Flannigan-Traquair vs 4-Osborne-Wilson
|
15 |
♠A6
♥T93
♦J853
♣AJT7
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
♠QJ9532
♥AJ865
♦-
♣Q9
|
♠K74
♥Q742
♦KQT9
♣84
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 2♦ 1NT ♥2/3 ♠3 |
EW: 4♥ 3♠ ♣4 ♦5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
50 7.00 0.00 4♥ E -1 2-Kostrinsky-Walker vs 9-Monro-Monro
200 6.00 1.00 2♠ W +3 5-Nickerson-Bowlen vs 5-Cecchi-Boyson
420 4.50 2.50 4♠ W 3-Gibson-Beall vs 1-Bannatyne-Hansen
420 4.50 2.50 4♠ W 9-Pollhammer-Fraser vs 2-Friedman-Usher
450 2.50 4.50 4♠ W +1 8-Jensen-McEvoy vs 10-Paul-Schramm
450 2.50 4.50 4♠ W +1 10-Flannigan-Traquair vs 4-Osborne-Wilson
480 1.00 6.00 4♥ W +2 4-Binsted-Strachan vs 3-Blackburn-Senaratne
800 0.00 7.00 5♦* N -3 1-Antonsen-Wood vs 7-Johansen-Wanless
|
16 |
♠AJT762
♥Q72
♦2
♣KQ4
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
♠K53
♥T83
♦QJ93
♣T62
|
♠Q98
♥AKJ5
♦A8
♣J987
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 1/-♥ 2/1♠ ♣6 ♥7/6 NT6/5 |
EW: 1♣ 1NT ♦6/5 ♥6 ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
140 7.00 0.00 3♠ N 2-Kostrinsky-Walker vs 8-Cates-Krout
110 5.00 2.00 2♠ N 4-Binsted-Strachan vs 2-Friedman-Usher
110 5.00 2.00 2♠ N 5-Nickerson-Bowlen vs 4-Osborne-Wilson
110 5.00 2.00 2♠ N 9-Pollhammer-Fraser vs 1-Bannatyne-Hansen
50 2.50 4.50 3♠ N -1 10-Flannigan-Traquair vs 3-Blackburn-Senaratne
50 2.50 4.50 2♠ N -1 3-Gibson-Beall vs 10-Paul-Schramm
120 1.00 6.00 1N E +1 6-Haley-Catherall vs 6-Neilsen-Neilsen
150 0.00 7.00 2N E +1 1-Antonsen-Wood vs 5-Cecchi-Boyson
|
17 |
♠JT9862
♥Q2
♦86
♣AJ2
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
♠54
♥J9754
♦A4
♣KQ94
|
♠K73
♥86
♦Q953
♣T753
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 4♦ 3♥ 4♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣6/5 ♦3 ♥4 ♠2 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
420 5.50 1.50 4♠ N 1-Antonsen-Wood vs 5-Cecchi-Boyson
420 5.50 1.50 4♠ N 2-Kostrinsky-Walker vs 8-Cates-Krout
420 5.50 1.50 4♠ N 5-Nickerson-Bowlen vs 4-Osborne-Wilson
420 5.50 1.50 4♠ N 6-Haley-Catherall vs 6-Neilsen-Neilsen
200 3.00 4.00 3♠ N +2 3-Gibson-Beall vs 10-Paul-Schramm
110 2.00 5.00 2♠ N 10-Flannigan-Traquair vs 3-Blackburn-Senaratne
90 1.00 6.00 2♦ S 9-Pollhammer-Fraser vs 1-Bannatyne-Hansen
50 0.00 7.00 4♠ N -1 4-Binsted-Strachan vs 2-Friedman-Usher
|
18 |
♠Q54
♥8763
♦KQ876
♣6
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
♠AT82
♥K952
♦92
♣A98
|
♠J763
♥JT4
♦AT43
♣43
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 1♦ -/1NT ♥5/6 ♠4 NT5/7 |
EW: 1♥ 2♠ ♣4 ♦6 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
630 7.00 0.00 3N N +1 2-Kostrinsky-Walker vs 8-Cates-Krout
130 5.00 2.00 4♣ S 1-Antonsen-Wood vs 5-Cecchi-Boyson
130 5.00 2.00 3♣ S +1 4-Binsted-Strachan vs 2-Friedman-Usher
130 5.00 2.00 2♣ S +2 5-Nickerson-Bowlen vs 4-Osborne-Wilson
110 2.00 5.00 3♣ S 6-Haley-Catherall vs 6-Neilsen-Neilsen
110 2.00 5.00 3♣ S 9-Pollhammer-Fraser vs 1-Bannatyne-Hansen
110 2.00 5.00 3♣ S 10-Flannigan-Traquair vs 3-Blackburn-Senaratne
200 0.00 7.00 5♣ N -2 3-Gibson-Beall vs 10-Paul-Schramm
|
19 |
♠Q32
♥Q76
♦Q532
♣KQT
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
♠T98
♥AK5
♦JT
♣A9864
|
♠KJ754
♥98
♦AK6
♣J75
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦6 ♥6 ♠3 NT3 |
EW: 4♣ 1♦ 1♥ 4♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
170 6.00 1.00 3♠ E +1 4-Binsted-Strachan vs 1-Bannatyne-Hansen
170 6.00 1.00 2♠ E +2 3-Gibson-Beall vs 9-Monro-Monro
170 6.00 1.00 2♠ E +2 7-Arnot-Landry vs 7-Johansen-Wanless
620 3.50 3.50 4♠ E 1-Antonsen-Wood vs 4-Osborne-Wilson
620 3.50 3.50 4♠ E 5-Nickerson-Bowlen vs 3-Blackburn-Senaratne
630 1.00 6.00 3N W +1 2-Kostrinsky-Walker vs 6-Neilsen-Neilsen
630 1.00 6.00 3N W +1 6-Haley-Catherall vs 5-Cecchi-Boyson
630 1.00 6.00 3N W +1 10-Flannigan-Traquair vs 2-Friedman-Usher
|
20 |
♠AQ2
♥QJ64
♦A
♣KJ864
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
♠J653
♥AT75
♦84
♣QT5
|
♠K4
♥K9832
♦Q65
♣A32
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 5/4♦ 3/2♠ ♥5 NT6 |
EW: 1/2♥ 1NT ♣4 ♦2 ♠4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
620 7.00 0.00 4♠ N 3-Gibson-Beall vs 9-Monro-Monro
400 6.00 1.00 3♣ W -4 4-Binsted-Strachan vs 1-Bannatyne-Hansen
100 5.00 2.00 4♦ S -1 7-Arnot-Landry vs 7-Johansen-Wanless
140 4.00 3.00 3♥ E 10-Flannigan-Traquair vs 2-Friedman-Usher
200 2.50 4.50 3N N -2 1-Antonsen-Wood vs 4-Osborne-Wilson
200 2.50 4.50 2N N -2 6-Haley-Catherall vs 5-Cecchi-Boyson
300 1.00 6.00 3N N -3 5-Nickerson-Bowlen vs 3-Blackburn-Senaratne
400 0.00 7.00 3N N -4 2-Kostrinsky-Walker vs 6-Neilsen-Neilsen
|
21 |
♠A9
♥943
♦AJT8
♣JT74
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
♠82
♥AJ652
♦K952
♣62
|
♠KJ65
♥QT87
♦Q
♣A983
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 1♠ ♣6 ♥3 NT5 |
EW: 3♥ 2NT ♣6 ♦5 ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
PASS 7.00 0.00 Pass Out 6-Haley-Catherall vs 5-Cecchi-Boyson
110 6.00 1.00 2♥ W 4-Binsted-Strachan vs 1-Bannatyne-Hansen
140 3.50 3.50 2♥ W +1 3-Gibson-Beall vs 9-Monro-Monro
140 3.50 3.50 2♥ W +1 7-Arnot-Landry vs 7-Johansen-Wanless
140 3.50 3.50 2♥ W +1 10-Flannigan-Traquair vs 2-Friedman-Usher
140 3.50 3.50 2♥ E +1 5-Nickerson-Bowlen vs 3-Blackburn-Senaratne
170 0.50 6.50 3♥ W +1 1-Antonsen-Wood vs 4-Osborne-Wilson
170 0.50 6.50 3♥ W +1 2-Kostrinsky-Walker vs 6-Neilsen-Neilsen
|
22 |
♠A32
♥KT
♦J82
♣Q7432
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
♠K854
♥J543
♦97
♣KJ6
|
♠QJ6
♥Q982
♦KQ53
♣AT
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♦ ♥4 ♠5 NT6 |
EW: 3♥ 2♠ 1NT ♣6 ♦6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
90 6.50 0.50 1N E 2-Kostrinsky-Walker vs 5-Cecchi-Boyson
90 6.50 0.50 1N E 4-Binsted-Strachan vs 10-Paul-Schramm
110 5.00 2.00 2♥ W 6-Haley-Catherall vs 4-Osborne-Wilson
140 2.00 5.00 2♥ W +1 3-Gibson-Beall vs 7-Johansen-Wanless
140 2.00 5.00 2♥ W +1 5-Nickerson-Bowlen vs 2-Friedman-Usher
140 2.00 5.00 2♥ W +1 7-Arnot-Landry vs 6-Neilsen-Neilsen
140 2.00 5.00 2♥ W +1 8-Jensen-McEvoy vs 8-Cates-Krout
140 2.00 5.00 2♥ E +1 1-Antonsen-Wood vs 3-Blackburn-Senaratne
|
23 |
♠93
♥98753
♦K983
♣A2
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
♠K765
♥KJ
♦AJ642
♣64
|
♠AT
♥AT42
♦QT75
♣QJ5
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ ♦1/2 ♥4 ♠6 NT3 |
EW: 4♦ 2/1♥ 4NT ♣5 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
110 7.00 0.00 3♦ W 6-Haley-Catherall vs 4-Osborne-Wilson
180 6.00 1.00 2N E +2 8-Jensen-McEvoy vs 8-Cates-Krout
600 4.50 2.50 3N E 2-Kostrinsky-Walker vs 5-Cecchi-Boyson
600 4.50 2.50 3N E 7-Arnot-Landry vs 6-Neilsen-Neilsen
630 2.00 5.00 3N E +1 1-Antonsen-Wood vs 3-Blackburn-Senaratne
630 2.00 5.00 3N E +1 3-Gibson-Beall vs 7-Johansen-Wanless
630 2.00 5.00 3N E +1 5-Nickerson-Bowlen vs 2-Friedman-Usher
660 0.00 7.00 3N E +2 4-Binsted-Strachan vs 10-Paul-Schramm
|
24 |
♠Q97
♥5
♦JT8743
♣AQ4
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
♠-
♥AQJ8632
♦A2
♣JT72
|
♠KJT84
♥K4
♦K65
♣K95
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣1 ♦6 ♥1 ♠4 NT2 |
EW: 6♣ 1♦ 6♥ 2♠ 5NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
450 5.50 1.50 4♥ W +1 3-Gibson-Beall vs 7-Johansen-Wanless
450 5.50 1.50 4♥ W +1 4-Binsted-Strachan vs 10-Paul-Schramm
450 5.50 1.50 4♥ W +1 5-Nickerson-Bowlen vs 2-Friedman-Usher
450 5.50 1.50 4♥ W +1 8-Jensen-McEvoy vs 8-Cates-Krout
460 3.00 4.00 3N E +2 2-Kostrinsky-Walker vs 5-Cecchi-Boyson
480 1.00 6.00 4♥ W +2 1-Antonsen-Wood vs 3-Blackburn-Senaratne
480 1.00 6.00 4♥ W +2 6-Haley-Catherall vs 4-Osborne-Wilson
480 1.00 6.00 4♥ W +2 7-Arnot-Landry vs 6-Neilsen-Neilsen
|
25 |
♠AQJ853
♥K86
♦-
♣QT76
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
♠T
♥Q4
♦T8762
♣KJ985
|
♠762
♥A9732
♦AQ54
♣A
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♠ 2NT ♣6 ♦4 ♥5 |
EW: 3♦ -/1♥ ♣6 ♥6/7 ♠4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
170 6.50 0.50 3♠ N +1 6-Haley-Catherall vs 3-Blackburn-Senaratne
170 6.50 0.50 2♠ N +2 3-Gibson-Beall vs 6-Neilsen-Neilsen
140 3.50 3.50 3♠ N 5-Nickerson-Bowlen vs 1-Bannatyne-Hansen
140 3.50 3.50 3♠ N 7-Arnot-Landry vs 5-Cecchi-Boyson
140 3.50 3.50 2♠ N +1 2-Kostrinsky-Walker vs 4-Osborne-Wilson
140 3.50 3.50 2♠ N +1 8-Jensen-McEvoy vs 7-Johansen-Wanless
50 1.00 6.00 3♠ N -1 4-Binsted-Strachan vs 8-Cates-Krout
100 0.00 7.00 4♠* N -1 9-Pollhammer-Fraser vs 9-Monro-Monro
|
26 |
♠KQ72
♥AJT864
♦AT
♣J
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
♠AT4
♥K973
♦J86
♣872
|
♠J3
♥52
♦Q42
♣KQ9654
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 4♦ 4♥ 5♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣5 ♦3 ♥2 ♠2 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
650 7.00 0.00 4♠ S +1 4-Binsted-Strachan vs 8-Cates-Krout
200 4.50 2.50 2♠ S +3 2-Kostrinsky-Walker vs 4-Osborne-Wilson
200 4.50 2.50 3♥ N +2 3-Gibson-Beall vs 6-Neilsen-Neilsen
200 4.50 2.50 2♥ N +3 5-Nickerson-Bowlen vs 1-Bannatyne-Hansen
200 4.50 2.50 2♥ N +3 9-Pollhammer-Fraser vs 9-Monro-Monro
140 1.00 6.00 3♥ N 7-Arnot-Landry vs 5-Cecchi-Boyson
140 1.00 6.00 2♥ N +1 6-Haley-Catherall vs 3-Blackburn-Senaratne
140 1.00 6.00 2♥ N +1 8-Jensen-McEvoy vs 7-Johansen-Wanless
|
27 |
♠KQ52
♥K5
♦AKQ82
♣65
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
♠A97
♥AT976
♦J63
♣KJ
|
♠T8
♥8432
♦9
♣AT9842
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ 2♠ ♣3 ♥2 NT6 |
EW: 4♣ 4♥ ♦4 ♠4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
140 6.50 0.50 3♠ N 5-Nickerson-Bowlen vs 1-Bannatyne-Hansen
140 6.50 0.50 3♠ N 9-Pollhammer-Fraser vs 9-Monro-Monro
110 5.00 2.00 3♦ N 3-Gibson-Beall vs 6-Neilsen-Neilsen
50 4.00 3.00 4♥ W -1 4-Binsted-Strachan vs 8-Cates-Krout
50 3.00 4.00 4♦ N -1 7-Arnot-Landry vs 5-Cecchi-Boyson
140 2.00 5.00 3♥ W 8-Jensen-McEvoy vs 7-Johansen-Wanless
200 1.00 6.00 3♥ W +2 6-Haley-Catherall vs 3-Blackburn-Senaratne
450 0.00 7.00 4♥ W +1 2-Kostrinsky-Walker vs 4-Osborne-Wilson
|
28 |
♠A432
♥K94
♦K73
♣K93
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
♠J9865
♥5
♦AQ6
♣AT84
|
♠Q
♥JT86
♦8542
♣J765
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 3♥ 2♠ 2/3NT ♣6 |
EW: 1♣ ♦5/6 ♥4 ♠5 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
600 7.00 0.00 3N N 4-Binsted-Strachan vs 7-Johansen-Wanless
170 5.50 1.50 2♥ S +2 3-Gibson-Beall vs 5-Cecchi-Boyson
170 5.50 1.50 2♥ S +2 7-Arnot-Landry vs 4-Osborne-Wilson
140 3.50 3.50 3♠ S 8-Jensen-McEvoy vs 6-Neilsen-Neilsen
140 3.50 3.50 2♥ S +1 10-Flannigan-Traquair vs 10-Paul-Schramm
100 1.00 6.00 4♥ S -1 9-Pollhammer-Fraser vs 8-Cates-Krout
100 1.00 6.00 3♥ S -1 5-Nickerson-Bowlen vs 9-Monro-Monro
100 1.00 6.00 3♥ S -1 6-Haley-Catherall vs 2-Friedman-Usher
|
29 |
♠Q3
♥T9876
♦Q8
♣J932
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
♠2
♥43
♦AK7532
♣Q854
|
♠AT97654
♥Q
♦T64
♣AK
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦0 ♥6 ♠2 NT3 |
EW: 2♣ 6♦ 4♠ 2NT ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
170 5.50 1.50 3♠ E +1 5-Nickerson-Bowlen vs 9-Monro-Monro
170 5.50 1.50 3♠ E +1 6-Haley-Catherall vs 2-Friedman-Usher
170 5.50 1.50 3♠ E +1 8-Jensen-McEvoy vs 6-Neilsen-Neilsen
170 5.50 1.50 3♠ E +1 9-Pollhammer-Fraser vs 8-Cates-Krout
200 3.00 4.00 3♥ S -2 7-Arnot-Landry vs 4-Osborne-Wilson
400 2.00 5.00 4♥ S -4 4-Binsted-Strachan vs 7-Johansen-Wanless
620 0.50 6.50 4♠ E 3-Gibson-Beall vs 5-Cecchi-Boyson
620 0.50 6.50 4♠ E 10-Flannigan-Traquair vs 10-Paul-Schramm
|
30 |
♠T32
♥3
♦AJ93
♣AJ985
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
♠7654
♥QJ876
♦KT
♣K3
|
♠AK9
♥T2
♦Q8642
♣T74
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 2♦ 1♥ 1♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣3 ♦5 ♥5 ♠5/6 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
120 7.00 0.00 1N N +1 7-Arnot-Landry vs 4-Osborne-Wilson
90 5.50 1.50 1N N 8-Jensen-McEvoy vs 6-Neilsen-Neilsen
90 5.50 1.50 2♦ N 3-Gibson-Beall vs 5-Cecchi-Boyson
PASS 3.50 3.50 Pass Out 4-Binsted-Strachan vs 7-Johansen-Wanless
PASS 3.50 3.50 Pass Out 10-Flannigan-Traquair vs 10-Paul-Schramm
50 1.00 6.00 3N S -1 9-Pollhammer-Fraser vs 8-Cates-Krout
50 1.00 6.00 2N N -1 5-Nickerson-Bowlen vs 9-Monro-Monro
50 1.00 6.00 2N N -1 6-Haley-Catherall vs 2-Friedman-Usher
|