1 |
♠J98
♥A87532
♦K2
♣97
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
♠AQ7642
♥K9
♦T76
♣K6
|
♠KT
♥4
♦AQ853
♣AQJ42
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣0 ♦1 ♥6 ♠0 NT0 |
EW: 6♣ 5♦ -/1♥ 6♠ 1/6NT ♥6/7 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
200 4.00 0.00 3♠ W +2 5-Gousie-McMullen vs 4-Robbins-Robbins
260 3.00 1.00 3♠ W +4 4-Lawson-Lawson vs 2-Dailey-Falls
400 2.00 2.00 3N W 3-Hardy-Reeve vs 5-Rusby-Maxson
480 0.50 3.50 4♠ W +2 1-Wenneman-Kalhorn vs 1-Stoa-Fallen
480 0.50 3.50 4♠ W +2 2-Wyman-Lemaster vs 3-Hubman-Titcomb
|
2 |
♠AJ87
♥73
♦AK4
♣KJ74
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
♠QT43
♥AQJT6
♦75
♣A9
|
♠K52
♥K82
♦QJ86
♣T62
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ ♦6 ♥4 ♠5 NT6 |
EW: 1♦ 2/3♥ 1♠ 1NT ♣5/6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 4.00 0.00 2♠ N -1 3-Hardy-Reeve vs 5-Rusby-Maxson
140 2.00 2.00 2♥ W +1 1-Wenneman-Kalhorn vs 1-Stoa-Fallen
140 2.00 2.00 2♥ W +1 4-Lawson-Lawson vs 2-Dailey-Falls
140 2.00 2.00 2♥ W +1 5-Gousie-McMullen vs 4-Robbins-Robbins
670 0.00 4.00 2♥* W +2 2-Wyman-Lemaster vs 3-Hubman-Titcomb
|
3 |
♠J9854
♥A73
♦J932
♣K
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
♠QT63
♥J96
♦QT84
♣73
|
♠A
♥T854
♦A5
♣AJ9864
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 1♥ 2♠ 1NT ♣6 |
EW: 1♣ ♦5 ♥6 ♠5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
140 4.00 0.00 2♠ N +1 2-Wyman-Lemaster vs 3-Hubman-Titcomb
110 3.00 1.00 2♠ N 3-Hardy-Reeve vs 5-Rusby-Maxson
50 1.50 2.50 1N S -1 5-Gousie-McMullen vs 4-Robbins-Robbins
50 1.50 2.50 3♠ N -1 4-Lawson-Lawson vs 2-Dailey-Falls
90 0.00 4.00 2♣ E 1-Wenneman-Kalhorn vs 1-Stoa-Fallen
|
4 |
♠AQ7
♥KT
♦Q962
♣AJT8
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
♠JT98
♥AQ74
♦743
♣95
|
♠K6542
♥9653
♦AKT
♣4
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 3/2♦ 2/1NT ♥4 ♠5/4 |
EW: 2♥ 2♠ ♣3 ♦4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
600 4.00 0.00 3N N 2-Wyman-Lemaster vs 3-Hubman-Titcomb
180 3.00 1.00 1N N +3 1-Wenneman-Kalhorn vs 1-Stoa-Fallen
130 2.00 2.00 3♣ N +1 5-Gousie-McMullen vs 4-Robbins-Robbins
120 1.00 3.00 1N N +1 3-Hardy-Reeve vs 5-Rusby-Maxson
100 0.00 4.00 2♠ E -1 4-Lawson-Lawson vs 2-Dailey-Falls
|
5 |
♠AK
♥AQ2
♦Q975
♣8643
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
♠QJT4
♥KT75
♦A3
♣KJ9
|
♠852
♥9
♦KJT42
♣Q752
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ ♣5 ♦5 ♠5 NT5 |
EW: 2♣ 2♦ 1♠ 2NT ♥5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
140 4.00 0.00 2♥ N +1 5-Gousie-McMullen vs 4-Robbins-Robbins
90 3.00 1.00 2♣ E 4-Lawson-Lawson vs 2-Dailey-Falls
100 2.00 2.00 2♥ N -1 3-Hardy-Reeve vs 5-Rusby-Maxson
200 0.50 3.50 3♥ N -2 1-Wenneman-Kalhorn vs 1-Stoa-Fallen
200 0.50 3.50 3♥ N -2 2-Wyman-Lemaster vs 3-Hubman-Titcomb
|
6 |
♠65
♥AQ9732
♦93
♣AJ2
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
♠-
♥85
♦AKJ7652
♣KQT8
|
♠AKJT7432
♥KJT4
♦4
♣-
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6 ♦2 ♥4/5 ♠2/1 NT3/2 |
EW: 1♣ 3♦ 2♥ 4♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 4.00 0.00 6♠ E -1 5-Gousie-McMullen vs 3-Hubman-Titcomb
650 1.50 2.50 4♠ E +1 1-Wenneman-Kalhorn vs 5-Rusby-Maxson
650 1.50 2.50 4♠ E +1 2-Wyman-Lemaster vs 2-Dailey-Falls
650 1.50 2.50 4♠ E +1 3-Hardy-Reeve vs 4-Robbins-Robbins
650 1.50 2.50 4♠ E +1 4-Lawson-Lawson vs 1-Stoa-Fallen
|
7 |
♠K
♥KJT875
♦J86
♣AT3
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
♠AJT972
♥-
♦Q954
♣Q74
|
♠543
♥Q943
♦A2
♣9865
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 3♦ 3♥ 1NT ♠5 |
EW: 2♠ ♣5 ♦4 ♥3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
620 3.50 0.50 4♥ N 2-Wyman-Lemaster vs 2-Dailey-Falls
620 3.50 0.50 4♥ N 5-Gousie-McMullen vs 3-Hubman-Titcomb
100 1.00 3.00 4♥ N -1 1-Wenneman-Kalhorn vs 5-Rusby-Maxson
100 1.00 3.00 4♥ N -1 3-Hardy-Reeve vs 4-Robbins-Robbins
100 1.00 3.00 4♥ N -1 4-Lawson-Lawson vs 1-Stoa-Fallen
|
8 |
♠AQJ
♥AKJ4
♦KQ3
♣KT4
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
♠KT953
♥T32
♦974
♣AQ
|
♠42
♥Q5
♦AT8652
♣876
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 1♦ 5♥ 3♠ 5NT |
EW: ♣2 ♦6 ♥2 ♠4 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
430 4.00 0.00 3N N +1 5-Gousie-McMullen vs 3-Hubman-Titcomb
110 3.00 1.00 2♣ N +1 2-Wyman-Lemaster vs 2-Dailey-Falls
100 1.50 2.50 2N N -2 1-Wenneman-Kalhorn vs 5-Rusby-Maxson
100 1.50 2.50 3♥ N -2 4-Lawson-Lawson vs 1-Stoa-Fallen
150 0.00 4.00 3N N -3 3-Hardy-Reeve vs 4-Robbins-Robbins
|
9 |
♠AT64
♥T82
♦2
♣T7643
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
♠QJ
♥AKJ763
♦A98
♣KJ
|
♠9852
♥4
♦QJ7654
♣85
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ -/1♠ ♦3/4 ♥4/5 ♠6/7 NT4/5 |
EW: 3♦ 2♥ ♣4 ♠5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
200 4.00 0.00 3♥ W -2 1-Wenneman-Kalhorn vs 5-Rusby-Maxson
50 3.00 1.00 3♣ S -1 2-Wyman-Lemaster vs 2-Dailey-Falls
110 2.00 2.00 2♥ W 3-Hardy-Reeve vs 4-Robbins-Robbins
170 1.00 3.00 1♥ W +3 4-Lawson-Lawson vs 1-Stoa-Fallen
200 0.00 4.00 3♥ W +2 5-Gousie-McMullen vs 3-Hubman-Titcomb
|
10 |
♠T97
♥52
♦AT643
♣K96
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
♠QJ862
♥QJT86
♦K
♣84
|
♠K3
♥743
♦Q9872
♣A53
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 2♦ 2NT ♥4 ♠6 |
EW: 2♥ 1♠ ♣4 ♦5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
180 4.00 0.00 1N S +3 4-Lawson-Lawson vs 1-Stoa-Fallen
150 2.50 1.50 2N S +1 2-Wyman-Lemaster vs 2-Dailey-Falls
150 2.50 1.50 2N S +1 3-Hardy-Reeve vs 4-Robbins-Robbins
120 1.00 3.00 2N N 1-Wenneman-Kalhorn vs 5-Rusby-Maxson
110 0.00 4.00 3♣ S 5-Gousie-McMullen vs 3-Hubman-Titcomb
|
11 |
♠T762
♥754
♦JT3
♣KJ8
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
♠J53
♥862
♦864
♣T743
|
♠A8
♥KQT93
♦KQ92
♣A5
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 3♠ ♦5 ♥5/4 NT6/4 |
EW: 1♦ 2♥ ♣5 ♠4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
120 4.00 0.00 1N S +1 1-Wenneman-Kalhorn vs 4-Robbins-Robbins
50 3.00 1.00 2♠ S -1 4-Lawson-Lawson vs 5-Rusby-Maxson
100 2.00 2.00 1N* S -1 3-Hardy-Reeve vs 3-Hubman-Titcomb
110 1.00 3.00 2♥ E 5-Gousie-McMullen vs 2-Dailey-Falls
140 0.00 4.00 2♥ E +1 2-Wyman-Lemaster vs 1-Stoa-Fallen
|
12 |
♠KT42
♥84
♦K9
♣AQJ93
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
♠AJ975
♥K95
♦J76
♣65
|
♠Q3
♥T32
♦QT84
♣K742
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 2♦ 3♥ 1♠ 2NT |
EW: ♣3 ♦5 ♥3 ♠6 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
170 4.00 0.00 2♥ S +2 2-Wyman-Lemaster vs 1-Stoa-Fallen
140 3.00 1.00 2♥ S +1 5-Gousie-McMullen vs 2-Dailey-Falls
130 2.00 2.00 2♣ N +2 3-Hardy-Reeve vs 3-Hubman-Titcomb
120 1.00 3.00 2N S 4-Lawson-Lawson vs 5-Rusby-Maxson
200 0.00 4.00 3N N -2 1-Wenneman-Kalhorn vs 4-Robbins-Robbins
|
13 |
♠T8743
♥93
♦A76
♣AKJ
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
♠652
♥KJT4
♦T954
♣84
|
♠AJ
♥8762
♦Q82
♣QT73
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 3♦ 1♥ 4♠ 4NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦4 ♥6 ♠3 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
650 3.00 1.00 4♠ N +1 2-Wyman-Lemaster vs 1-Stoa-Fallen
650 3.00 1.00 4♠ N +1 3-Hardy-Reeve vs 3-Hubman-Titcomb
650 3.00 1.00 4♠ N +1 5-Gousie-McMullen vs 2-Dailey-Falls
620 1.00 3.00 4♠ N 4-Lawson-Lawson vs 5-Rusby-Maxson
200 0.00 4.00 4♠ N -2 1-Wenneman-Kalhorn vs 4-Robbins-Robbins
|
14 |
♠AQ82
♥A65
♦J2
♣KQ98
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
♠T3
♥KQ987
♦A74
♣A74
|
♠954
♥J432
♦Q5
♣6532
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 5♦ 5♠ 1NT ♥6 |
EW: 1♥ ♣4 ♦2 ♠2 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
450 4.00 0.00 4♠ N +1 3-Hardy-Reeve vs 3-Hubman-Titcomb
420 3.00 1.00 4♠ N 1-Wenneman-Kalhorn vs 4-Robbins-Robbins
400 2.00 2.00 5♦ S 5-Gousie-McMullen vs 2-Dailey-Falls
140 1.00 3.00 3♠ N 4-Lawson-Lawson vs 5-Rusby-Maxson
100 0.00 4.00 3N N -2 2-Wyman-Lemaster vs 1-Stoa-Fallen
|
15 |
♠T863
♥T3
♦752
♣JT94
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
♠AQJ7
♥K
♦AQT
♣KQ763
|
♠K54
♥Q984
♦843
♣852
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦4 ♥6 ♠2 NT3 |
EW: 4♣ 2♦ 1♥ 4♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 4.00 0.00 4♠ E -2 5-Gousie-McMullen vs 2-Dailey-Falls
50 3.00 1.00 4♠ E -1 3-Hardy-Reeve vs 3-Hubman-Titcomb
100 2.00 2.00 1♥ S -1 1-Wenneman-Kalhorn vs 4-Robbins-Robbins
110 0.50 3.50 3♣ W 2-Wyman-Lemaster vs 1-Stoa-Fallen
110 0.50 3.50 3♣ W 4-Lawson-Lawson vs 5-Rusby-Maxson
|
16 |
♠K
♥73
♦AK98652
♣KQ8
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
♠AJT87
♥AKT85
♦-
♣T65
|
♠92
♥QJ9642
♦Q43
♣73
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 5♦ ♥3 ♠6 NT6 |
EW: 4♥ ♣2 ♦2 ♠6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
550 4.00 0.00 5♦* N 5-Gousie-McMullen vs 1-Stoa-Fallen
400 2.50 1.50 5♦ N 1-Wenneman-Kalhorn vs 3-Hubman-Titcomb
400 2.50 1.50 5♦ N 3-Hardy-Reeve vs 2-Dailey-Falls
650 1.00 3.00 4♥ W +1 4-Lawson-Lawson vs 4-Robbins-Robbins
680 0.00 4.00 4♥ W +2 2-Wyman-Lemaster vs 5-Rusby-Maxson
|
17 |
♠AJ64
♥JT
♦K8
♣JT876
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
♠T
♥KQ98
♦J96432
♣92
|
♠Q952
♥A7542
♦A5
♣43
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 3♠ 1NT ♦5 ♥4 |
EW: 2♦ 3♥ ♣4 ♠4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
110 4.00 0.00 2♠ N 4-Lawson-Lawson vs 4-Robbins-Robbins
50 2.00 2.00 4♠ N -1 2-Wyman-Lemaster vs 5-Rusby-Maxson
50 2.00 2.00 4♠ N -1 3-Hardy-Reeve vs 2-Dailey-Falls
50 2.00 2.00 4♠ N -1 5-Gousie-McMullen vs 1-Stoa-Fallen
100 0.00 4.00 4♠ N -2 1-Wenneman-Kalhorn vs 3-Hubman-Titcomb
|
18 |
♠QT82
♥65
♦72
♣AQ987
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
♠AK964
♥KT2
♦A65
♣63
|
♠53
♥Q873
♦943
♣KT52
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♦ -/1NT ♥6 ♠6 NT6/7 |
EW: 1♥ 1♠ ♣5 ♦6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
90 3.50 0.50 2♦ S 1-Wenneman-Kalhorn vs 3-Hubman-Titcomb
90 3.50 0.50 2♦ S 3-Hardy-Reeve vs 2-Dailey-Falls
50 2.00 2.00 2♠ W -1 2-Wyman-Lemaster vs 5-Rusby-Maxson
100 0.50 3.50 3N N -1 5-Gousie-McMullen vs 1-Stoa-Fallen
100 0.50 3.50 2♦ S -1 4-Lawson-Lawson vs 4-Robbins-Robbins
|
19 |
♠7
♥T74
♦T98763
♣J62
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
♠KT985
♥AKJ
♦AKQ2
♣3
|
♠AQJ62
♥Q53
♦4
♣AT87
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4 ♦4 ♥1 ♠0 NT1 |
EW: 2♣ 3♦ 5♥ 7♠ 6NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
710 4.00 0.00 4♠ W +3 4-Lawson-Lawson vs 4-Robbins-Robbins
1460 1.50 2.50 6♠ W +1 1-Wenneman-Kalhorn vs 3-Hubman-Titcomb
1460 1.50 2.50 6♠ W +1 2-Wyman-Lemaster vs 5-Rusby-Maxson
1460 1.50 2.50 6♠ W +1 3-Hardy-Reeve vs 2-Dailey-Falls
1460 1.50 2.50 6♠ W +1 5-Gousie-McMullen vs 1-Stoa-Fallen
|
20 |
♠KQJT65
♥82
♦J6
♣Q84
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
♠98732
♥KJ
♦952
♣J32
|
♠4
♥QT93
♦KQT43
♣K97
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3/2♣ 4♠ ♦5 ♥6 NT6 |
EW: 1♦ 1NT ♣4 ♥6 ♠3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
1070 4.00 0.00 2♠* N +2 3-Hardy-Reeve vs 2-Dailey-Falls
140 2.50 1.50 2♠ N +1 1-Wenneman-Kalhorn vs 3-Hubman-Titcomb
140 2.50 1.50 3♥ S 4-Lawson-Lawson vs 4-Robbins-Robbins
100 0.50 3.50 4♠ N -1 2-Wyman-Lemaster vs 5-Rusby-Maxson
100 0.50 3.50 4♠ N -1 5-Gousie-McMullen vs 1-Stoa-Fallen
|
21 |
♠J2
♥Q5
♦AKT987
♣A96
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
♠AQ96
♥742
♦J
♣KJT42
|
♠75
♥AJT93
♦643
♣Q75
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ 1♠ 1NT ♣4 ♥4 |
EW: 3♣ 2♥ ♦4 ♠6 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
130 4.00 0.00 3♦ N +1 3-Hardy-Reeve vs 1-Stoa-Fallen
110 3.00 1.00 3♦ N 5-Gousie-McMullen vs 5-Rusby-Maxson
50 2.00 2.00 4♥ E -1 4-Lawson-Lawson vs 3-Hubman-Titcomb
100 0.50 3.50 2♠ S -1 1-Wenneman-Kalhorn vs 2-Dailey-Falls
100 0.50 3.50 3♦ N -1 2-Wyman-Lemaster vs 4-Robbins-Robbins
|
22 |
♠J954
♥94
♦KQ7
♣J763
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
♠T83
♥A65
♦954
♣AKQ8
|
♠A76
♥KJ82
♦AJT86
♣4
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦2 ♥3 ♠4 NT3 |
EW: 2♣ 5♦ 4♥ 2♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 4.00 0.00 2N W -1 2-Wyman-Lemaster vs 4-Robbins-Robbins
150 2.50 1.50 3♦ E +2 1-Wenneman-Kalhorn vs 2-Dailey-Falls
150 2.50 1.50 2♦ E +3 3-Hardy-Reeve vs 1-Stoa-Fallen
630 1.00 3.00 3N E +1 4-Lawson-Lawson vs 3-Hubman-Titcomb
660 0.00 4.00 3N E +2 5-Gousie-McMullen vs 5-Rusby-Maxson
|
23 |
♠Q3
♥J83
♦K87
♣AKQ98
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
♠JT74
♥KQT742
♦T
♣T6
|
♠652
♥65
♦J6532
♣752
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 7♣ 6♦ 2/3♥ 5♠ 7NT |
EW: ♣0 ♦1 ♥4 ♠1 NT0 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
1370 4.00 0.00 6♣ N 1-Wenneman-Kalhorn vs 2-Dailey-Falls
720 3.00 1.00 3N S +4 3-Hardy-Reeve vs 1-Stoa-Fallen
640 2.00 2.00 5♣ N +2 2-Wyman-Lemaster vs 4-Robbins-Robbins
600 1.00 3.00 5♦ S 5-Gousie-McMullen vs 5-Rusby-Maxson
100 0.00 4.00 5♣ N -1 4-Lawson-Lawson vs 3-Hubman-Titcomb
|
24 |
♠Q8
♥K953
♦843
♣J742
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
♠AT972
♥4
♦AKT75
♣65
|
♠65
♥QJ86
♦QJ92
♣KQ3
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 2♥ ♦3 ♠5 NT6 |
EW: 3♦ 1♠ 1NT ♣4 ♥5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
50 3.00 1.00 2N E -1 4-Lawson-Lawson vs 3-Hubman-Titcomb
50 3.00 1.00 5♦ E -1 1-Wenneman-Kalhorn vs 2-Dailey-Falls
50 3.00 1.00 3♦ W -1 3-Hardy-Reeve vs 1-Stoa-Fallen
110 1.00 3.00 3♦ W 2-Wyman-Lemaster vs 4-Robbins-Robbins
430 0.00 4.00 3N E +1 5-Gousie-McMullen vs 5-Rusby-Maxson
|
25 |
♠AJ3
♥-
♦KQT432
♣7652
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
♠Q82
♥KQJ8
♦98
♣A943
|
♠T976
♥T962
♦A6
♣QT8
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 5♦ 1♥ 1♠ 2NT |
EW: ♣5 ♦2 ♥6 ♠5 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
430 4.00 0.00 3N S +1 2-Wyman-Lemaster vs 4-Robbins-Robbins
150 3.00 1.00 2♦ N +3 3-Hardy-Reeve vs 1-Stoa-Fallen
50 2.00 2.00 3N S -1 5-Gousie-McMullen vs 5-Rusby-Maxson
100 0.50 3.50 3N S -2 4-Lawson-Lawson vs 3-Hubman-Titcomb
100 0.50 3.50 4♦ N -2 1-Wenneman-Kalhorn vs 2-Dailey-Falls
|