1 |
♠2
♥T8763
♦QJ974
♣98
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
♠AKJ9753
♥Q9
♦63
♣T2
|
♠Q6
♥A5
♦AT8
♣KQJ654
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ 2♥ ♣1 ♠1 NT1 |
EW: 3♣ 5♠ 3NT ♦4 ♥5/4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
150 7.00 0.00 3♣ E +2 2-Ruegg-Cockroft vs 2-Phillips-Tovey
450 4.50 2.50 5♠ W 6-Johnson-Bromley vs 3-Moore-Moore
450 4.50 2.50 4♠ W +1 3-Van Sickle-Van Sickle vs 4-Guichon-Guichon
450 4.50 2.50 4♠ W +1 5-Chaffee-Goerzen vs 8-Kwan-Martignago
450 4.50 2.50 4♠ W +1 7-Ottridge-Maunsell vs 5-Williams-Brady
480 1.50 5.50 4♠ W +2 1-Ophoff-Matheson vs 1-Bell-Satanove
480 1.50 5.50 4♠ W +2 8-Cameron-Lenaghan vs 7-Warnes-lacey
490 0.00 7.00 3N E +3 4-Shapiro-Emerman vs 6-Bromley-Laidlaw
|
2 |
♠JT9
♥KQ632
♦T72
♣K2
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
♠Q84
♥5
♦J853
♣AT954
|
♠A6
♥AJT987
♦Q
♣QJ73
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 1♠ ♣3 ♥5 NT5 |
EW: 3/4♣ 2♥ 1NT ♦6 ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
50 6.50 0.50 2♥ E -1 8-Cameron-Lenaghan vs 7-Warnes-lacey
50 6.50 0.50 5♣ E -1 7-Ottridge-Maunsell vs 5-Williams-Brady
80 5.00 2.00 1♥ E 2-Ruegg-Cockroft vs 2-Phillips-Tovey
100 3.50 3.50 3♠ S -1 5-Chaffee-Goerzen vs 8-Kwan-Martignago
100 3.50 3.50 2♠ S -1 6-Johnson-Bromley vs 3-Moore-Moore
110 2.00 5.00 2♥ E 4-Shapiro-Emerman vs 6-Bromley-Laidlaw
200 1.00 6.00 4♠* N -1 3-Van Sickle-Van Sickle vs 4-Guichon-Guichon
400 0.00 7.00 4♦ S -4 1-Ophoff-Matheson vs 1-Bell-Satanove
|
3 |
♠T74
♥J5
♦J8432
♣K98
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
♠A63
♥642
♦KQ6
♣AJT2
|
♠K92
♥AQ873
♦A975
♣4
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6 ♦4 ♥2 ♠5 NT3 |
EW: 3♦ 4♥ 2♠ 3NT ♣6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 7.00 0.00 3N W -1 6-Johnson-Bromley vs 3-Moore-Moore
140 6.00 1.00 3♥ E 7-Ottridge-Maunsell vs 5-Williams-Brady
630 4.00 3.00 3N W +1 1-Ophoff-Matheson vs 1-Bell-Satanove
630 4.00 3.00 3N W +1 4-Shapiro-Emerman vs 6-Bromley-Laidlaw
630 4.00 3.00 3N W +1 8-Cameron-Lenaghan vs 7-Warnes-lacey
650 1.50 5.50 4♥ E +1 2-Ruegg-Cockroft vs 2-Phillips-Tovey
650 1.50 5.50 4♥ E +1 5-Chaffee-Goerzen vs 8-Kwan-Martignago
660 0.00 7.00 3N W +2 3-Van Sickle-Van Sickle vs 4-Guichon-Guichon
|
4 |
♠AJT9
♥J8
♦K8743
♣42
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
♠75432
♥765
♦52
♣Q86
|
♠KQ6
♥KQT4
♦9
♣AKT73
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♦ 1NT ♣5 ♥6/5 ♠5 |
EW: 2♣ 1♥ 2♠ ♦3 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
130 5.00 2.00 4♦ S 3-Van Sickle-Van Sickle vs 3-Moore-Moore
130 5.00 2.00 3♦ S +1 6-Johnson-Bromley vs 2-Phillips-Tovey
130 5.00 2.00 3♦ S +1 7-Ottridge-Maunsell vs 4-Guichon-Guichon
130 5.00 2.00 3♦ N +1 8-Cameron-Lenaghan vs 6-Bromley-Laidlaw
130 5.00 2.00 2♦ N +2 2-Ruegg-Cockroft vs 1-Bell-Satanove
110 2.00 5.00 3♦ S 4-Shapiro-Emerman vs 5-Williams-Brady
90 1.00 6.00 1N S 1-Ophoff-Matheson vs 8-Kwan-Martignago
140 0.00 7.00 3♥ E 5-Chaffee-Goerzen vs 7-Warnes-lacey
|
5 |
♠54
♥6432
♦K987
♣974
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
♠J98
♥AKJT8
♦AQ
♣AJ3
|
♠AKQT2
♥7
♦JT32
♣K62
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣1 ♦1 ♥0 ♠0 NT0 |
EW: 5/6♣ 6♦ 7♥ 7♠ 7NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
490 7.00 0.00 3N E +3 6-Johnson-Bromley vs 2-Phillips-Tovey
980 5.50 1.50 6♠ W 8-Cameron-Lenaghan vs 6-Bromley-Laidlaw
980 5.50 1.50 6♠ E 7-Ottridge-Maunsell vs 4-Guichon-Guichon
990 4.00 3.00 6N E 3-Van Sickle-Van Sickle vs 3-Moore-Moore
1010 2.00 5.00 6♠ E +1 2-Ruegg-Cockroft vs 1-Bell-Satanove
1010 2.00 5.00 6♠ E +1 4-Shapiro-Emerman vs 5-Williams-Brady
1010 2.00 5.00 6♠ E +1 5-Chaffee-Goerzen vs 7-Warnes-lacey
1020 0.00 7.00 6N E +1 1-Ophoff-Matheson vs 8-Kwan-Martignago
|
6 |
♠Q852
♥32
♦K64
♣KQT2
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
♠96
♥AKJ4
♦AQT93
♣54
|
♠AKJ3
♥85
♦J72
♣A963
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4 ♦1 ♥4 ♠3 NT2 |
EW: 3♣ 6♦ 3♥ 3♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
600 5.00 2.00 3N W 2-Ruegg-Cockroft vs 1-Bell-Satanove
600 5.00 2.00 3N W 5-Chaffee-Goerzen vs 7-Warnes-lacey
600 5.00 2.00 3N E 1-Ophoff-Matheson vs 8-Kwan-Martignago
600 5.00 2.00 3N E 3-Van Sickle-Van Sickle vs 3-Moore-Moore
600 5.00 2.00 3N E 7-Ottridge-Maunsell vs 4-Guichon-Guichon
630 2.00 5.00 3N E +1 6-Johnson-Bromley vs 2-Phillips-Tovey
690 0.50 6.50 3N E +3 4-Shapiro-Emerman vs 5-Williams-Brady
690 0.50 6.50 3N E +3 8-Cameron-Lenaghan vs 6-Bromley-Laidlaw
|
7 |
♠Q96
♥KJ4
♦JT976
♣A7
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
♠AT85
♥9875
♦852
♣J3
|
♠KJ7432
♥AT62
♦3
♣T9
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 6♣ 6♦ ♥5 ♠5 NT6 |
EW: 2♠ ♣1 ♦0 ♥6 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
1370 7.00 0.00 6♦ N 5-Chaffee-Goerzen vs 6-Bromley-Laidlaw
640 6.00 1.00 5♦ S +2 4-Shapiro-Emerman vs 4-Guichon-Guichon
630 5.00 2.00 3N N +1 8-Cameron-Lenaghan vs 5-Williams-Brady
620 3.50 3.50 5♦ N +1 7-Ottridge-Maunsell vs 3-Moore-Moore
620 3.50 3.50 5♣ S +1 1-Ophoff-Matheson vs 7-Warnes-lacey
190 2.00 5.00 4♦ N +3 2-Ruegg-Cockroft vs 8-Kwan-Martignago
300 0.50 6.50 3N N -3 3-Van Sickle-Van Sickle vs 2-Phillips-Tovey
300 0.50 6.50 3N N -3 6-Johnson-Bromley vs 1-Bell-Satanove
|
8 |
♠KJ84
♥K74
♦9876
♣T5
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
♠65
♥AT85
♦AQ32
♣AK2
|
♠AT93
♥J93
♦5
♣J9876
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣2/3 ♦5/6 ♥3 ♠4 NT4 |
EW: 4♣ 1♦ 4♥ 3♠ 2NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
50 6.50 0.50 3N W -1 8-Cameron-Lenaghan vs 5-Williams-Brady
50 6.50 0.50 1N W -1 3-Van Sickle-Van Sickle vs 2-Phillips-Tovey
90 4.50 2.50 1N W 2-Ruegg-Cockroft vs 8-Kwan-Martignago
90 4.50 2.50 1N W 5-Chaffee-Goerzen vs 6-Bromley-Laidlaw
120 2.50 4.50 1N W +1 6-Johnson-Bromley vs 1-Bell-Satanove
120 2.50 4.50 1N W +1 7-Ottridge-Maunsell vs 3-Moore-Moore
150 1.00 6.00 1N W +2 4-Shapiro-Emerman vs 4-Guichon-Guichon
180 0.00 7.00 1N W +3 1-Ophoff-Matheson vs 7-Warnes-lacey
|
9 |
♠AJ75
♥A764
♦8
♣AK73
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
♠K6432
♥5
♦T975
♣J64
|
♠QT9
♥93
♦AJ32
♣QT98
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 2♦ 6♥ 1♠ 4NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦5 ♥1 ♠6/5 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
980 6.00 1.00 6♥ S 2-Ruegg-Cockroft vs 8-Kwan-Martignago
980 6.00 1.00 6♥ S 3-Van Sickle-Van Sickle vs 2-Phillips-Tovey
980 6.00 1.00 6♥ S 7-Ottridge-Maunsell vs 3-Moore-Moore
510 4.00 3.00 4♥ N +3 1-Ophoff-Matheson vs 7-Warnes-lacey
480 1.50 5.50 5♥ S +1 5-Chaffee-Goerzen vs 6-Bromley-Laidlaw
480 1.50 5.50 4♥ S +2 4-Shapiro-Emerman vs 4-Guichon-Guichon
480 1.50 5.50 4♥ S +2 6-Johnson-Bromley vs 1-Bell-Satanove
480 1.50 5.50 4♥ S +2 8-Cameron-Lenaghan vs 5-Williams-Brady
|
10 |
♠7652
♥AQ92
♦Q9
♣KJ6
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
♠AQ8
♥85
♦J75
♣85432
|
♠JT4
♥JT7
♦K8642
♣Q7
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 1♦ 3/4♥ 3♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣5 ♦6 ♥3 ♠4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
620 6.00 1.00 4♥ N 4-Shapiro-Emerman vs 3-Moore-Moore
620 6.00 1.00 4♥ N 5-Chaffee-Goerzen vs 5-Williams-Brady
620 6.00 1.00 4♥ N 8-Cameron-Lenaghan vs 4-Guichon-Guichon
600 4.00 3.00 3N N 2-Ruegg-Cockroft vs 7-Warnes-lacey
180 3.00 4.00 1N N +3 1-Ophoff-Matheson vs 6-Bromley-Laidlaw
170 2.00 5.00 3♥ N +1 3-Van Sickle-Van Sickle vs 1-Bell-Satanove
100 0.50 6.50 4♥ N -1 6-Johnson-Bromley vs 8-Kwan-Martignago
100 0.50 6.50 4♥ N -1 7-Ottridge-Maunsell vs 2-Phillips-Tovey
|
11 |
♠J96
♥Q54
♦JT872
♣54
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
♠732
♥93
♦AK6
♣AQ872
|
♠T54
♥AJT2
♦543
♣J63
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1/2♦ 1♥ 1♠ ♣6 NT6 |
EW: 1♣ 1NT ♦5 ♥6 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
90 7.00 0.00 1N N 5-Chaffee-Goerzen vs 5-Williams-Brady
50 5.50 1.50 3♣ W -1 4-Shapiro-Emerman vs 3-Moore-Moore
50 5.50 1.50 2♣ W -1 7-Ottridge-Maunsell vs 2-Phillips-Tovey
50 3.00 4.00 1N S -1 3-Van Sickle-Van Sickle vs 1-Bell-Satanove
50 3.00 4.00 1N S -1 6-Johnson-Bromley vs 8-Kwan-Martignago
50 3.00 4.00 1N S -1 8-Cameron-Lenaghan vs 4-Guichon-Guichon
110 1.00 6.00 2♣ W +1 2-Ruegg-Cockroft vs 7-Warnes-lacey
150 0.00 7.00 3♠ S -3 1-Ophoff-Matheson vs 6-Bromley-Laidlaw
|
12 |
♠A87
♥AKJ74
♦K94
♣T7
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
♠QT32
♥8
♦JT63
♣K942
|
♠J65
♥95
♦AQ85
♣8653
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♥ 2NT ♣5 ♦5 ♠6 |
EW: 2♣ 1♦ ♥3 ♠6 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
620 4.50 2.50 4♥ N 2-Ruegg-Cockroft vs 7-Warnes-lacey
620 4.50 2.50 4♥ N 3-Van Sickle-Van Sickle vs 1-Bell-Satanove
620 4.50 2.50 4♥ N 4-Shapiro-Emerman vs 3-Moore-Moore
620 4.50 2.50 4♥ N 5-Chaffee-Goerzen vs 5-Williams-Brady
620 4.50 2.50 4♥ N 6-Johnson-Bromley vs 8-Kwan-Martignago
620 4.50 2.50 4♥ N 7-Ottridge-Maunsell vs 2-Phillips-Tovey
600 1.00 6.00 3N N 1-Ophoff-Matheson vs 6-Bromley-Laidlaw
100 0.00 7.00 4♥ N -1 8-Cameron-Lenaghan vs 4-Guichon-Guichon
|
13 |
♠QJ5
♥KJ84
♦JT872
♣5
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
♠T987
♥95
♦A93
♣8762
|
♠6432
♥AT73
♦Q54
♣KQ
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 3♦ 3♥ 3NT ♠6 |
EW: ♣3 ♦4/3 ♥4/3 ♠6 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
660 7.00 0.00 3N S +2 5-Chaffee-Goerzen vs 4-Guichon-Guichon
630 6.00 1.00 3N S +1 1-Ophoff-Matheson vs 5-Williams-Brady
600 4.50 2.50 3N S 7-Ottridge-Maunsell vs 1-Bell-Satanove
600 4.50 2.50 3N N 3-Van Sickle-Van Sickle vs 8-Kwan-Martignago
150 3.00 4.00 2N S +1 8-Cameron-Lenaghan vs 3-Moore-Moore
130 2.00 5.00 2♣ S +2 6-Johnson-Bromley vs 7-Warnes-lacey
120 1.00 6.00 1N S +1 4-Shapiro-Emerman vs 2-Phillips-Tovey
110 0.00 7.00 2♣ S +1 2-Ruegg-Cockroft vs 6-Bromley-Laidlaw
|
14 |
♠T84
♥KQT987
♦AJ
♣K5
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
♠-
♥J52
♦KT865
♣JT976
|
♠QJ963
♥A3
♦7432
♣A4
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♥ 3♠ 3NT ♣6 ♦4 |
EW: 2/3♦ ♣6 ♥4 ♠4 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
690 7.00 0.00 2N* S +2 5-Chaffee-Goerzen vs 4-Guichon-Guichon
420 5.50 1.50 4♥ N 2-Ruegg-Cockroft vs 6-Bromley-Laidlaw
420 5.50 1.50 4♥ N 4-Shapiro-Emerman vs 2-Phillips-Tovey
400 4.00 3.00 4N W -8 7-Ottridge-Maunsell vs 1-Bell-Satanove
200 3.00 4.00 2♥ N +3 6-Johnson-Bromley vs 7-Warnes-lacey
110 2.00 5.00 2♥ N 8-Cameron-Lenaghan vs 3-Moore-Moore
50 1.00 6.00 4♠ S -1 3-Van Sickle-Van Sickle vs 8-Kwan-Martignago
300 0.00 7.00 5♠* S -2 1-Ophoff-Matheson vs 5-Williams-Brady
|
15 |
♠AK8
♥832
♦AQ953
♣J9
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
♠943
♥AKJ9
♦KT2
♣AQ2
|
♠Q76
♥T65
♦864
♣KT53
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4 ♦6 ♥4 ♠6 NT4 |
EW: 2/3♣ 1♦ 2/3♥ -/1♠ 3NT ♠6/7 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
150 7.00 0.00 3♣ E -3 6-Johnson-Bromley vs 7-Warnes-lacey
90 6.00 1.00 2♦ N 4-Shapiro-Emerman vs 2-Phillips-Tovey
90 4.00 3.00 1N W 1-Ophoff-Matheson vs 5-Williams-Brady
90 4.00 3.00 1N W 2-Ruegg-Cockroft vs 6-Bromley-Laidlaw
90 4.00 3.00 1N W 3-Van Sickle-Van Sickle vs 8-Kwan-Martignago
100 2.00 5.00 2♦ S -1 5-Chaffee-Goerzen vs 4-Guichon-Guichon
120 1.00 6.00 1N W +1 8-Cameron-Lenaghan vs 3-Moore-Moore
150 0.00 7.00 1N W +2 7-Ottridge-Maunsell vs 1-Bell-Satanove
|
16 |
♠Q97642
♥K92
♦T6
♣A3
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
♠T85
♥J8
♦J5
♣KJ8642
|
♠K
♥A73
♦AK8742
♣Q97
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♥ 3♠ 1NT ♣2 ♦4 |
EW: 4♣ 3/2♦ ♥3 ♠4 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
140 6.50 0.50 2♠ N +1 5-Chaffee-Goerzen vs 3-Moore-Moore
140 6.50 0.50 3♥ S 6-Johnson-Bromley vs 6-Bromley-Laidlaw
130 4.00 3.00 2♦ E +2 2-Ruegg-Cockroft vs 5-Williams-Brady
130 4.00 3.00 2♦ E +2 7-Ottridge-Maunsell vs 8-Kwan-Martignago
130 4.00 3.00 2♦ E +2 8-Cameron-Lenaghan vs 2-Phillips-Tovey
150 1.50 5.50 3♦ E +2 3-Van Sickle-Van Sickle vs 7-Warnes-lacey
150 1.50 5.50 3♦ E +2 4-Shapiro-Emerman vs 1-Bell-Satanove
170 0.00 7.00 3♦ E +3 1-Ophoff-Matheson vs 4-Guichon-Guichon
|
17 |
♠KQJ3
♥63
♦T982
♣974
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
♠AT86
♥KQ98
♦43
♣AT5
|
♠72
♥AT542
♦AJ
♣Q863
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ ♣3 ♥2 ♠6 NT3 |
EW: 4♣ 4♥ 1♠ 2NT ♦6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
50 7.00 0.00 5♥ E -1 5-Chaffee-Goerzen vs 3-Moore-Moore
140 5.50 1.50 3♥ E 3-Van Sickle-Van Sickle vs 7-Warnes-lacey
140 5.50 1.50 1♥ E +2 7-Ottridge-Maunsell vs 8-Kwan-Martignago
170 2.50 4.50 3♥ E +1 1-Ophoff-Matheson vs 4-Guichon-Guichon
170 2.50 4.50 3♥ E +1 6-Johnson-Bromley vs 6-Bromley-Laidlaw
170 2.50 4.50 2♥ E +2 4-Shapiro-Emerman vs 1-Bell-Satanove
170 2.50 4.50 1♥ E +3 2-Ruegg-Cockroft vs 5-Williams-Brady
420 0.00 7.00 4♥ E 8-Cameron-Lenaghan vs 2-Phillips-Tovey
|
18 |
♠-
♥A982
♦J975
♣AQJ63
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
♠AQ9752
♥43
♦Q432
♣T
|
♠K843
♥J65
♦T6
♣8752
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 6♣ 5♦ 7♥ 1NT ♠5 |
EW: 2♠ ♣1 ♦2 ♥0 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
680 5.50 1.50 5♥ S +1 1-Ophoff-Matheson vs 4-Guichon-Guichon
680 5.50 1.50 5♥ N +1 3-Van Sickle-Van Sickle vs 7-Warnes-lacey
680 5.50 1.50 4♥ S +2 2-Ruegg-Cockroft vs 5-Williams-Brady
680 5.50 1.50 4♥ S +2 8-Cameron-Lenaghan vs 2-Phillips-Tovey
650 3.00 4.00 4♥ S +1 5-Chaffee-Goerzen vs 3-Moore-Moore
600 2.00 5.00 5♣ N 7-Ottridge-Maunsell vs 8-Kwan-Martignago
130 1.00 6.00 3♣ N +1 4-Shapiro-Emerman vs 1-Bell-Satanove
100 0.00 7.00 5♣ S -1 6-Johnson-Bromley vs 6-Bromley-Laidlaw
|
19 |
♠A
♥AK82
♦KJ32
♣7652
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
♠J53
♥J43
♦9874
♣T83
|
♠Q982
♥QT9
♦A6
♣AJ94
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 3♦ 3♥ 2♠ 2NT |
EW: ♣5 ♦4 ♥4 ♠5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
400 6.50 0.50 3N S 4-Shapiro-Emerman vs 8-Kwan-Martignago
400 6.50 0.50 3N S 5-Chaffee-Goerzen vs 2-Phillips-Tovey
150 4.50 2.50 1N N +2 1-Ophoff-Matheson vs 3-Moore-Moore
150 4.50 2.50 1N N +2 6-Johnson-Bromley vs 5-Williams-Brady
130 3.00 4.00 2♦ N +2 7-Ottridge-Maunsell vs 7-Warnes-lacey
120 2.00 5.00 2N N 8-Cameron-Lenaghan vs 1-Bell-Satanove
110 1.00 6.00 2♠ S 2-Ruegg-Cockroft vs 4-Guichon-Guichon
50 0.00 7.00 3N N -1 3-Van Sickle-Van Sickle vs 6-Bromley-Laidlaw
|
20 |
♠62
♥9642
♦KT
♣J8543
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
♠QJ7
♥AQ3
♦7432
♣A92
|
♠AK4
♥KJT75
♦Q98
♣T7
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ ♦5 ♥4 ♠6 NT4 |
EW: 2♦ 3♥ 1♠ 3NT ♣6/5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
200 6.50 0.50 4♥ E -2 5-Chaffee-Goerzen vs 2-Phillips-Tovey
200 6.50 0.50 4♥ E -2 6-Johnson-Bromley vs 5-Williams-Brady
100 4.50 2.50 4♥ E -1 3-Van Sickle-Van Sickle vs 6-Bromley-Laidlaw
100 4.50 2.50 4♥ E -1 4-Shapiro-Emerman vs 8-Kwan-Martignago
600 3.00 4.00 3N W 1-Ophoff-Matheson vs 3-Moore-Moore
620 2.00 5.00 4♥ E 2-Ruegg-Cockroft vs 4-Guichon-Guichon
630 0.50 6.50 3N W +1 7-Ottridge-Maunsell vs 7-Warnes-lacey
630 0.50 6.50 3N W +1 8-Cameron-Lenaghan vs 1-Bell-Satanove
|
21 |
♠A72
♥K74
♦T832
♣QJ2
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
♠54
♥JT9
♦K65
♣T9876
|
♠KQJT9
♥A8
♦AJ94
♣A4
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4 ♦3 ♥6 ♠3 NT3 |
EW: 3♣ 4/3♦ 1/-♥ 4/3♠ 4/3NT ♥7/6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
140 5.50 1.50 2♠ E +1 6-Johnson-Bromley vs 5-Williams-Brady
140 5.50 1.50 1♠ E +2 1-Ophoff-Matheson vs 3-Moore-Moore
140 5.50 1.50 1♠ E +2 5-Chaffee-Goerzen vs 2-Phillips-Tovey
140 5.50 1.50 1♠ E +2 8-Cameron-Lenaghan vs 1-Bell-Satanove
170 2.00 5.00 1♠ E +3 2-Ruegg-Cockroft vs 4-Guichon-Guichon
170 2.00 5.00 1♠ E +3 3-Van Sickle-Van Sickle vs 6-Bromley-Laidlaw
170 2.00 5.00 1♠ E +3 4-Shapiro-Emerman vs 8-Kwan-Martignago
200 0.00 7.00 1♠ E +4 7-Ottridge-Maunsell vs 7-Warnes-lacey
|
22 |
♠A82
♥AJ953
♦4
♣KJ73
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
♠65
♥42
♦AKT632
♣654
|
♠QJT9743
♥KQ
♦J8
♣QT
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 1♦ 5♥ 2NT ♠6 |
EW: 1♠ ♣2 ♦6 ♥2 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
450 6.00 1.00 5♥ N 3-Van Sickle-Van Sickle vs 5-Williams-Brady
450 6.00 1.00 4♥ N +1 4-Shapiro-Emerman vs 7-Warnes-lacey
450 6.00 1.00 4♥ N +1 5-Chaffee-Goerzen vs 1-Bell-Satanove
200 3.50 3.50 3♠ E -2 7-Ottridge-Maunsell vs 6-Bromley-Laidlaw
200 3.50 3.50 3♥ N +2 2-Ruegg-Cockroft vs 3-Moore-Moore
100 2.00 5.00 2♠ E -1 1-Ophoff-Matheson vs 2-Phillips-Tovey
50 1.00 6.00 5♥ N -1 6-Johnson-Bromley vs 4-Guichon-Guichon
110 0.00 7.00 2♠ E 8-Cameron-Lenaghan vs 8-Kwan-Martignago
|
23 |
♠3
♥A764
♦QJ32
♣KQJ3
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
♠98762
♥T952
♦AT5
♣5
|
♠KJ4
♥KQ83
♦86
♣9842
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 6♦ 1♥ 1♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣1 ♦1 ♥5 ♠6 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
660 6.00 1.00 3N S +2 2-Ruegg-Cockroft vs 3-Moore-Moore
660 6.00 1.00 3N S +2 3-Van Sickle-Van Sickle vs 5-Williams-Brady
660 6.00 1.00 3N N +2 5-Chaffee-Goerzen vs 1-Bell-Satanove
630 3.50 3.50 3N N +1 4-Shapiro-Emerman vs 7-Warnes-lacey
630 3.50 3.50 3N N +1 7-Ottridge-Maunsell vs 6-Bromley-Laidlaw
600 1.50 5.50 3N N 1-Ophoff-Matheson vs 2-Phillips-Tovey
600 1.50 5.50 3N N 6-Johnson-Bromley vs 4-Guichon-Guichon
100 0.00 7.00 5♣ S -1 8-Cameron-Lenaghan vs 8-Kwan-Martignago
|
24 |
♠8532
♥KJ5
♦J5
♣Q983
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
♠AJ97
♥9
♦K9876
♣AK6
|
♠QT4
♥T873
♦T2
♣7542
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: -/1♣ 2/3♥ -/1NT ♣5/7 ♦5/6 ♠4/5 NT6/7 |
EW: 1♠ ♣6 ♦6 ♥4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
170 7.00 0.00 2♥ S +2 7-Ottridge-Maunsell vs 6-Bromley-Laidlaw
140 5.00 2.00 3♥ S 2-Ruegg-Cockroft vs 3-Moore-Moore
140 5.00 2.00 3♥ S 4-Shapiro-Emerman vs 7-Warnes-lacey
140 5.00 2.00 1♥ S +2 6-Johnson-Bromley vs 4-Guichon-Guichon
110 3.00 4.00 1♥ S +1 1-Ophoff-Matheson vs 2-Phillips-Tovey
50 1.50 5.50 3N S -1 8-Cameron-Lenaghan vs 8-Kwan-Martignago
50 1.50 5.50 4♥ S -1 5-Chaffee-Goerzen vs 1-Bell-Satanove
100 0.00 7.00 3♥ S -2 3-Van Sickle-Van Sickle vs 5-Williams-Brady
|