1 |
♠K
♥KJ653
♦KQ942
♣42
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
♠QT97654
♥Q2
♦J
♣K63
|
♠83
♥T98
♦7653
♣QJ95
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 7♦ 7♥ 7NT ♠6 |
EW: 1♠ ♣3 ♦0 ♥0 NT0 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
1010 6.50 0.50 6♥ N 7 3-Bagley-Yingst vs 4-Kelley-Elsner
1010 6.50 0.50 6♥ N 7 7-Rainwater-Woodward vs 5-Smith-Smith
520 5.00 2.00 3N S 7 2-Van Zevern-Harder vs 2-Overgaard-Gill
510 2.00 5.00 5♥ N 7 5-Imholte-DePuy vs 8-McCalden-McCalden
510 2.00 5.00 4♥ S 7 4-Hartshorn-Gallegos vs 6-McGregor-Huser
510 2.00 5.00 4♥ N 7 1-Wheaton-Wheaton vs 1-Silveira-Silveira
510 2.00 5.00 4♥ N 7 6-Minson-Porter vs 3-Shepard-Davis
510 2.00 5.00 4♥ N 7 8-Nelson-Nelson vs 7-Stansbury-Stansbury
|
2 |
♠3
♥AQT2
♦AJ975
♣864
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
♠942
♥J84
♦82
♣AKT32
|
♠A76
♥9765
♦T43
♣J75
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 4♦ 4♥ 4♠ 1NT |
EW: ♣6 ♦2/1 ♥3 ♠2 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
630 7.00 0.00 3N N 4 5-Imholte-DePuy vs 8-McCalden-McCalden
620 4.00 3.00 4♠ S 4 1-Wheaton-Wheaton vs 1-Silveira-Silveira
620 4.00 3.00 4♠ S 4 2-Van Zevern-Harder vs 2-Overgaard-Gill
620 4.00 3.00 4♠ S 4 3-Bagley-Yingst vs 4-Kelley-Elsner
620 4.00 3.00 4♠ S 4 6-Minson-Porter vs 3-Shepard-Davis
620 4.00 3.00 4♠ S 4 7-Rainwater-Woodward vs 5-Smith-Smith
600 1.00 6.00 3N N 3 8-Nelson-Nelson vs 7-Stansbury-Stansbury
170 0.00 7.00 2♠ S 4 4-Hartshorn-Gallegos vs 6-McGregor-Huser
|
3 |
♠T8
♥K82
♦K43
♣AKQT9
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
♠-
♥T9654
♦QJT52
♣J32
|
♠Q765432
♥AJ3
♦A8
♣8
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♠ 4NT ♦6 ♥5 |
EW: 2♥ ♣2 ♦6 ♠6 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
800 7.00 0.00 2♠* E -3 3-Bagley-Yingst vs 4-Kelley-Elsner
460 6.00 1.00 3N N 5 2-Van Zevern-Harder vs 2-Overgaard-Gill
430 5.00 2.00 3N N 4 5-Imholte-DePuy vs 8-McCalden-McCalden
400 3.50 3.50 3N N 3 6-Minson-Porter vs 3-Shepard-Davis
400 3.50 3.50 3N N 3 8-Nelson-Nelson vs 7-Stansbury-Stansbury
200 1.50 5.50 2♠ E -2 4-Hartshorn-Gallegos vs 6-McGregor-Huser
200 1.50 5.50 2♠ E -2 7-Rainwater-Woodward vs 5-Smith-Smith
150 0.00 7.00 2N S 3 1-Wheaton-Wheaton vs 1-Silveira-Silveira
|
4 |
♠Q973
♥K7
♦KQ3
♣9653
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
♠K54
♥JT62
♦J85
♣AJ7
|
♠AT8
♥Q84
♦T92
♣KT84
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 1♠ ♣6 ♥6 NT6 |
EW: 1NT ♣6 ♦6 ♥6 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
PASS 4.50 2.50 Pass Out 2-Van Zevern-Harder vs 1-Silveira-Silveira
PASS 4.50 2.50 Pass Out 4-Hartshorn-Gallegos vs 5-Smith-Smith
PASS 4.50 2.50 Pass Out 5-Imholte-DePuy vs 7-Stansbury-Stansbury
PASS 4.50 2.50 Pass Out 6-Minson-Porter vs 2-Overgaard-Gill
PASS 4.50 2.50 Pass Out 7-Rainwater-Woodward vs 4-Kelley-Elsner
PASS 4.50 2.50 Pass Out 8-Nelson-Nelson vs 6-McGregor-Huser
100 0.50 6.50 1N S -1 1-Wheaton-Wheaton vs 8-McCalden-McCalden
100 0.50 6.50 2♦ S -1 3-Bagley-Yingst vs 3-Shepard-Davis
|
5 |
♠JT5
♥Q654
♦KJ7
♣J94
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
♠9432
♥K7
♦AQ9865
♣A
|
♠AKQ
♥AJ
♦T4
♣KQT872
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣0 ♦2 ♥3 ♠0 NT0 |
EW: 7♣ 5♦ 4♥ 7♠ 7NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
490 7.00 0.00 3N E 6 5-Imholte-DePuy vs 7-Stansbury-Stansbury
510 6.00 1.00 4♠ E 7 4-Hartshorn-Gallegos vs 5-Smith-Smith
520 5.00 2.00 3N E 7 6-Minson-Porter vs 2-Overgaard-Gill
990 2.00 5.00 6N E 6 1-Wheaton-Wheaton vs 8-McCalden-McCalden
990 2.00 5.00 6N E 6 2-Van Zevern-Harder vs 1-Silveira-Silveira
990 2.00 5.00 6N E 6 3-Bagley-Yingst vs 3-Shepard-Davis
990 2.00 5.00 6N E 6 7-Rainwater-Woodward vs 4-Kelley-Elsner
990 2.00 5.00 6N E 6 8-Nelson-Nelson vs 6-McGregor-Huser
|
6 |
♠QJ842
♥AT75
♦-
♣9865
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
♠K76
♥82
♦KJ9865
♣T7
|
♠T9
♥KJ6
♦AQT2
♣AKQJ
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ 1♠ ♣2 ♦1 NT2 |
EW: 3/4♣ 5♦ 5NT ♥5 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
660 4.50 2.50 3N E 5 1-Wheaton-Wheaton vs 8-McCalden-McCalden
660 4.50 2.50 3N E 5 2-Van Zevern-Harder vs 1-Silveira-Silveira
660 4.50 2.50 3N E 5 3-Bagley-Yingst vs 3-Shepard-Davis
660 4.50 2.50 3N E 5 6-Minson-Porter vs 2-Overgaard-Gill
660 4.50 2.50 3N E 5 7-Rainwater-Woodward vs 4-Kelley-Elsner
660 4.50 2.50 3N E 5 8-Nelson-Nelson vs 6-McGregor-Huser
690 0.50 6.50 3N E 6 4-Hartshorn-Gallegos vs 5-Smith-Smith
690 0.50 6.50 3N E 6 5-Imholte-DePuy vs 7-Stansbury-Stansbury
|
7 |
♠T95
♥T98
♦K62
♣8763
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
♠874
♥A43
♦A4
♣AKQJ2
|
♠AKJ63
♥QJ6
♦Q7
♣T95
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣0 ♦6 ♥2 ♠0 NT0 |
EW: 7♣ 3/4♥ 7♠ 7NT ♦6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 7.00 0.00 6♠ E -1 7-Rainwater-Woodward vs 3-Shepard-Davis
620 6.00 1.00 5♣ W 6 1-Wheaton-Wheaton vs 7-Stansbury-Stansbury
650 4.50 2.50 5♠ W 5 5-Imholte-DePuy vs 6-McGregor-Huser
650 4.50 2.50 4♠ E 5 6-Minson-Porter vs 1-Silveira-Silveira
660 3.00 4.00 3N W 5 2-Van Zevern-Harder vs 8-McCalden-McCalden
690 2.00 5.00 3N E 6 4-Hartshorn-Gallegos vs 4-Kelley-Elsner
1440 1.00 6.00 6N W 6 3-Bagley-Yingst vs 2-Overgaard-Gill
1460 0.00 7.00 6♠ E 7 8-Nelson-Nelson vs 5-Smith-Smith
|
8 |
♠QJT9
♥K9763
♦QJ2
♣T
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
♠AK3
♥JT2
♦6
♣KJ8642
|
♠742
♥54
♦K7543
♣AQ7
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 4♥ 2♠ ♣4 NT5 |
EW: 2♣ ♦5 ♥2 ♠4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
200 7.00 0.00 3♥ S 5 8-Nelson-Nelson vs 5-Smith-Smith
170 5.00 2.00 3♥ S 4 4-Hartshorn-Gallegos vs 4-Kelley-Elsner
170 5.00 2.00 3♥ N 4 2-Van Zevern-Harder vs 8-McCalden-McCalden
170 5.00 2.00 3♥ N 4 3-Bagley-Yingst vs 2-Overgaard-Gill
50 2.50 4.50 4♣ W -1 6-Minson-Porter vs 1-Silveira-Silveira
50 2.50 4.50 3♣ W -1 1-Wheaton-Wheaton vs 7-Stansbury-Stansbury
110 1.00 6.00 2♣ W 3 7-Rainwater-Woodward vs 3-Shepard-Davis
150 0.00 7.00 1N E 3 5-Imholte-DePuy vs 6-McGregor-Huser
|
9 |
♠QJ632
♥A752
♦K
♣J95
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
♠T754
♥Q3
♦6542
♣762
|
♠98
♥KT4
♦AQ97
♣AQT3
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 3♥ 2♠ 2/1NT ♦6 |
EW: 1♦ ♣6 ♥4 ♠4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
420 7.00 0.00 4♥ N 4 3-Bagley-Yingst vs 2-Overgaard-Gill
200 6.00 1.00 2♥ N 5 4-Hartshorn-Gallegos vs 4-Kelley-Elsner
140 4.50 2.50 2♠ N 3 8-Nelson-Nelson vs 5-Smith-Smith
140 4.50 2.50 2♥ N 3 6-Minson-Porter vs 1-Silveira-Silveira
110 3.00 4.00 2♠ N 2 7-Rainwater-Woodward vs 3-Shepard-Davis
100 2.00 5.00 1N E -1 5-Imholte-DePuy vs 6-McGregor-Huser
50 1.00 6.00 4♥ N -1 2-Van Zevern-Harder vs 8-McCalden-McCalden
120 0.00 7.00 1N E 2 1-Wheaton-Wheaton vs 7-Stansbury-Stansbury
|
10 |
♠J43
♥9752
♦JT832
♣T
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
♠A95
♥KJT64
♦74
♣Q74
|
♠T62
♥AQ
♦K5
♣AKJ953
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ ♣1 ♥1 ♠5 NT1 |
EW: 6/5♣ 6/5♥ 6/2NT ♦4 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
170 6.50 0.50 3♣ E 6 2-Van Zevern-Harder vs 7-Stansbury-Stansbury
170 6.50 0.50 2♣ E 6 7-Rainwater-Woodward vs 2-Overgaard-Gill
620 5.00 2.00 4♥ W 4 8-Nelson-Nelson vs 4-Kelley-Elsner
680 3.50 3.50 4♥ W 6 5-Imholte-DePuy vs 5-Smith-Smith
680 3.50 3.50 4♥ W 6 6-Minson-Porter vs 8-McCalden-McCalden
690 2.00 5.00 3N E 6 3-Bagley-Yingst vs 1-Silveira-Silveira
720 0.50 6.50 3N E 7 1-Wheaton-Wheaton vs 6-McGregor-Huser
720 0.50 6.50 3N E 7 4-Hartshorn-Gallegos vs 3-Shepard-Davis
|
11 |
♠Q43
♥KT82
♦KQ84
♣98
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
♠JT8762
♥9
♦AT7
♣652
|
♠K95
♥A64
♦63
♣AKJ73
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 2♥ ♣3 ♠4 NT6 |
EW: 4/3♣ 3♠ ♦6 ♥4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
300 7.00 0.00 4♠* W -2 8-Nelson-Nelson vs 4-Kelley-Elsner
50 6.00 1.00 4♠ E -1 2-Van Zevern-Harder vs 7-Stansbury-Stansbury
50 5.00 2.00 4♥ N -1 5-Imholte-DePuy vs 5-Smith-Smith
100 4.00 3.00 5♥ S -2 3-Bagley-Yingst vs 1-Silveira-Silveira
140 2.00 5.00 3♠ W 3 4-Hartshorn-Gallegos vs 3-Shepard-Davis
140 2.00 5.00 2♠ E 3 6-Minson-Porter vs 8-McCalden-McCalden
140 2.00 5.00 2♠ E 3 7-Rainwater-Woodward vs 2-Overgaard-Gill
170 0.00 7.00 3♠ E 4 1-Wheaton-Wheaton vs 6-McGregor-Huser
|
12 |
♠T4
♥J83
♦AQ98
♣T643
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
♠J73
♥QT
♦KT62
♣9875
|
♠K5
♥A752
♦J7
♣AKQJ2
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 2♥ 3♠ ♣5 NT6 |
EW: 2♣ 1NT ♦6/5 ♥4 ♠4/3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 6.00 1.00 4♣ E -2 2-Van Zevern-Harder vs 7-Stansbury-Stansbury
100 6.00 1.00 4♣ E -2 3-Bagley-Yingst vs 1-Silveira-Silveira
100 6.00 1.00 4♣ E -2 8-Nelson-Nelson vs 4-Kelley-Elsner
50 3.50 3.50 2N E -1 4-Hartshorn-Gallegos vs 3-Shepard-Davis
50 3.50 3.50 3♣ E -1 1-Wheaton-Wheaton vs 6-McGregor-Huser
110 1.50 5.50 3♣ W 3 5-Imholte-DePuy vs 5-Smith-Smith
110 1.50 5.50 3♣ E 3 6-Minson-Porter vs 8-McCalden-McCalden
130 0.00 7.00 2♣ E 4 7-Rainwater-Woodward vs 2-Overgaard-Gill
|
13 |
♠92
♥T75
♦987
♣T7654
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
♠T5
♥J843
♦KJ6
♣AK82
|
♠AKJ863
♥K9
♦A432
♣J
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦2 ♥3 ♠2 NT2 |
EW: 2♣ 5/4♦ 4♥ 5/4♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
620 7.00 0.00 4♠ E 4 1-Wheaton-Wheaton vs 5-Smith-Smith
630 6.00 1.00 3N W 4 7-Rainwater-Woodward vs 1-Silveira-Silveira
650 3.50 3.50 4♠ W 5 6-Minson-Porter vs 7-Stansbury-Stansbury
650 3.50 3.50 4♠ E 5 3-Bagley-Yingst vs 8-McCalden-McCalden
650 3.50 3.50 4♠ E 5 4-Hartshorn-Gallegos vs 2-Overgaard-Gill
650 3.50 3.50 4♠ E 5 8-Nelson-Nelson vs 3-Shepard-Davis
680 0.50 6.50 4♠ E 6 2-Van Zevern-Harder vs 6-McGregor-Huser
680 0.50 6.50 4♠ E 6 5-Imholte-DePuy vs 4-Kelley-Elsner
|
14 |
♠T62
♥92
♦KT
♣QJ9632
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
♠K75
♥AK4
♦7532
♣874
|
♠Q84
♥Q8653
♦J84
♣T5
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 2♦ 1♥ 4♠ 2NT |
EW: ♣1 ♦5/4 ♥6 ♠3 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
140 7.00 0.00 2♠ S 3 5-Imholte-DePuy vs 4-Kelley-Elsner
70 6.00 1.00 1♦ S 1 1-Wheaton-Wheaton vs 5-Smith-Smith
50 2.50 4.50 3N N -1 3-Bagley-Yingst vs 8-McCalden-McCalden
50 2.50 4.50 3N N -1 4-Hartshorn-Gallegos vs 2-Overgaard-Gill
50 2.50 4.50 3N N -1 6-Minson-Porter vs 7-Stansbury-Stansbury
50 2.50 4.50 3N N -1 7-Rainwater-Woodward vs 1-Silveira-Silveira
50 2.50 4.50 3N N -1 8-Nelson-Nelson vs 3-Shepard-Davis
50 2.50 4.50 3♠ S -1 2-Van Zevern-Harder vs 6-McGregor-Huser
|
15 |
♠T93
♥982
♦632
♣QJT3
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
♠AK76
♥AT54
♦A87
♣84
|
♠J42
♥7
♦KQT954
♣652
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 2♥ ♦2 ♠3 NT4 |
EW: 4♦ 4♠ 3NT ♣5 ♥5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
130 5.50 1.50 3♦ W 4 6-Minson-Porter vs 7-Stansbury-Stansbury
130 5.50 1.50 3♦ E 4 1-Wheaton-Wheaton vs 5-Smith-Smith
130 5.50 1.50 3♦ E 4 5-Imholte-DePuy vs 4-Kelley-Elsner
130 5.50 1.50 3♦ E 4 8-Nelson-Nelson vs 3-Shepard-Davis
150 2.00 5.00 4♦ W 5 3-Bagley-Yingst vs 8-McCalden-McCalden
150 2.00 5.00 3♦ W 5 7-Rainwater-Woodward vs 1-Silveira-Silveira
150 2.00 5.00 3♦ E 5 4-Hartshorn-Gallegos vs 2-Overgaard-Gill
500 0.00 7.00 3♥* S -2 2-Van Zevern-Harder vs 6-McGregor-Huser
|
16 |
♠Q2
♥K9754
♦T5
♣KJ85
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
♠943
♥QJT863
♦92
♣76
|
♠AJT865
♥-
♦AQ8
♣AT43
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2/1♣ 2/1♦ ♥6 ♠4 NT6 |
EW: 2♠ ♣5/4 ♦4/3 ♥6 NT6/5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
200 7.00 0.00 4♠ E -2 2-Van Zevern-Harder vs 5-Smith-Smith
130 6.00 1.00 3♦ S 4 8-Nelson-Nelson vs 2-Overgaard-Gill
100 4.50 2.50 4♠ E -1 4-Hartshorn-Gallegos vs 1-Silveira-Silveira
100 4.50 2.50 4♠ E -1 7-Rainwater-Woodward vs 8-McCalden-McCalden
100 3.00 4.00 4♦ S -2 1-Wheaton-Wheaton vs 4-Kelley-Elsner
140 1.50 5.50 3♠ E 3 3-Bagley-Yingst vs 7-Stansbury-Stansbury
140 1.50 5.50 3♠ E 3 6-Minson-Porter vs 6-McGregor-Huser
500 0.00 7.00 4♦* S -3 5-Imholte-DePuy vs 3-Shepard-Davis
|
17 |
♠QT975
♥JT82
♦J7
♣QT
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
♠J63
♥Q975
♦QT6
♣853
|
♠A2
♥K43
♦K85
♣J7642
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ 2♥ 5♠ 3NT ♣6 |
EW: ♣6 ♦4 ♥5 ♠2 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
450 7.00 0.00 4♠ N 5 3-Bagley-Yingst vs 7-Stansbury-Stansbury
420 6.00 1.00 4♠ N 4 8-Nelson-Nelson vs 2-Overgaard-Gill
400 5.00 2.00 3N S 3 4-Hartshorn-Gallegos vs 1-Silveira-Silveira
300 4.00 3.00 1N* E -2 7-Rainwater-Woodward vs 8-McCalden-McCalden
140 3.00 4.00 2♠ N 3 1-Wheaton-Wheaton vs 4-Kelley-Elsner
110 1.50 5.50 2♠ N 2 5-Imholte-DePuy vs 3-Shepard-Davis
110 1.50 5.50 3♦ S 3 2-Van Zevern-Harder vs 5-Smith-Smith
50 0.00 7.00 3N S -1 6-Minson-Porter vs 6-McGregor-Huser
|
18 |
♠542
♥J3
♦T63
♣AKT94
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
♠QJ9
♥Q964
♦AQ54
♣63
|
♠T87
♥T82
♦J7
♣QJ875
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 3♦ 1/2♥ 3♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣5 ♦4 ♥4/5 ♠4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
600 6.50 0.50 3N N 3 6-Minson-Porter vs 6-McGregor-Huser
600 6.50 0.50 3N N 3 8-Nelson-Nelson vs 2-Overgaard-Gill
150 4.00 3.00 2N N 3 1-Wheaton-Wheaton vs 4-Kelley-Elsner
150 4.00 3.00 2N N 3 3-Bagley-Yingst vs 7-Stansbury-Stansbury
150 4.00 3.00 2N N 3 7-Rainwater-Woodward vs 8-McCalden-McCalden
120 2.00 5.00 2N N 2 4-Hartshorn-Gallegos vs 1-Silveira-Silveira
110 1.00 6.00 3♦ S 3 2-Van Zevern-Harder vs 5-Smith-Smith
100 0.00 7.00 3N N -1 5-Imholte-DePuy vs 3-Shepard-Davis
|
19 |
♠A762
♥KJ763
♦T
♣KJ7
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
♠KQJ8
♥94
♦KJ962
♣86
|
♠53
♥AQ85
♦Q75
♣AT52
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ ♣6 ♦3 ♠5 NT5 |
EW: 1/-♣ 4♦ 1♠ 2NT ♣7/6 ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
110 7.00 0.00 2♥ N 2 8-Nelson-Nelson vs 8-McCalden-McCalden
50 5.50 1.50 2♠ S -1 4-Hartshorn-Gallegos vs 7-Stansbury-Stansbury
50 5.50 1.50 2♥ S -1 3-Bagley-Yingst vs 5-Smith-Smith
100 4.00 3.00 3♥ N -2 6-Minson-Porter vs 4-Kelley-Elsner
150 2.00 5.00 1N S -3 1-Wheaton-Wheaton vs 2-Overgaard-Gill
150 2.00 5.00 1N S -3 7-Rainwater-Woodward vs 6-McGregor-Huser
150 2.00 5.00 2♠ N -3 2-Van Zevern-Harder vs 3-Shepard-Davis
200 0.00 7.00 1N S -4 5-Imholte-DePuy vs 1-Silveira-Silveira
|
20 |
♠6
♥JT6
♦QJ6532
♣KJT
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
♠AT742
♥K84
♦94
♣AQ5
|
♠KJ953
♥5
♦T8
♣98642
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♦ 4♥ 1NT ♣5 ♠5 |
EW: 2♣ 2♠ ♦3 ♥3 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
200 4.50 2.50 4♠ W -2 1-Wheaton-Wheaton vs 2-Overgaard-Gill
200 4.50 2.50 4♠ W -2 2-Van Zevern-Harder vs 3-Shepard-Davis
200 4.50 2.50 4♠ W -2 3-Bagley-Yingst vs 5-Smith-Smith
200 4.50 2.50 4♠ W -2 4-Hartshorn-Gallegos vs 7-Stansbury-Stansbury
200 4.50 2.50 4♠ W -2 6-Minson-Porter vs 4-Kelley-Elsner
200 4.50 2.50 4♠ W -2 8-Nelson-Nelson vs 8-McCalden-McCalden
100 1.00 6.00 3♠ W -1 5-Imholte-DePuy vs 1-Silveira-Silveira
200 0.00 7.00 5♥* S -1 7-Rainwater-Woodward vs 6-McGregor-Huser
|
21 |
♠T3
♥AK9863
♦AKJ3
♣J
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
♠A
♥52
♦864
♣AK75432
|
♠K9764
♥JT74
♦97
♣Q9
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♦ 3♥ 1♠ ♣4 NT4 |
EW: 3♣ ♦3 ♥4 ♠4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
170 7.00 0.00 3♥ N 4 7-Rainwater-Woodward vs 6-McGregor-Huser
140 5.00 2.00 3♥ N 3 1-Wheaton-Wheaton vs 2-Overgaard-Gill
140 5.00 2.00 3♥ N 3 6-Minson-Porter vs 4-Kelley-Elsner
140 5.00 2.00 3♥ N 3 8-Nelson-Nelson vs 8-McCalden-McCalden
130 3.00 4.00 4♦ N 4 3-Bagley-Yingst vs 5-Smith-Smith
100 2.00 5.00 5♣ W -2 5-Imholte-DePuy vs 1-Silveira-Silveira
50 1.00 6.00 4♣ W -1 4-Hartshorn-Gallegos vs 7-Stansbury-Stansbury
100 0.00 7.00 4♥ N -1 2-Van Zevern-Harder vs 3-Shepard-Davis
|
22 |
♠Q73
♥JT42
♦AKT72
♣A
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
♠KT
♥Q63
♦854
♣KT643
|
♠J984
♥A985
♦63
♣QJ9
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♦ 1♥ 3♠ 2NT ♣6 |
EW: 1/-♣ ♣7/6 ♦2 ♥6 ♠4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
150 7.00 0.00 1N N 3 4-Hartshorn-Gallegos vs 8-McCalden-McCalden
130 5.50 1.50 2♦ N 4 2-Van Zevern-Harder vs 4-Kelley-Elsner
130 5.50 1.50 2♦ N 4 8-Nelson-Nelson vs 1-Silveira-Silveira
110 3.00 4.00 2♠ S 2 1-Wheaton-Wheaton vs 3-Shepard-Davis
110 3.00 4.00 1♠ S 2 7-Rainwater-Woodward vs 7-Stansbury-Stansbury
110 3.00 4.00 3♦ N 3 5-Imholte-DePuy vs 2-Overgaard-Gill
50 0.50 6.50 2♠ S -1 3-Bagley-Yingst vs 6-McGregor-Huser
50 0.50 6.50 2♠ S -1 6-Minson-Porter vs 5-Smith-Smith
|
23 |
♠KT86
♥T97
♦J95
♣K82
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
♠97532
♥KJ8
♦KQ86
♣T
|
♠AQJ
♥54
♦AT72
♣QJ97
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6 ♦2 ♥6 ♠3 NT3 |
EW: 1♣ 5♦ 4♠ 3NT ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 6.50 0.50 2♥ S -1 4-Hartshorn-Gallegos vs 8-McCalden-McCalden
100 6.50 0.50 2♥ S -1 6-Minson-Porter vs 5-Smith-Smith
140 4.00 3.00 3♠ W 3 2-Van Zevern-Harder vs 4-Kelley-Elsner
140 4.00 3.00 3♠ W 3 5-Imholte-DePuy vs 2-Overgaard-Gill
140 4.00 3.00 2♠ W 3 1-Wheaton-Wheaton vs 3-Shepard-Davis
150 2.00 5.00 3♦ W 5 7-Rainwater-Woodward vs 7-Stansbury-Stansbury
170 0.50 6.50 3♠ W 4 3-Bagley-Yingst vs 6-McGregor-Huser
170 0.50 6.50 3♠ E 4 8-Nelson-Nelson vs 1-Silveira-Silveira
|
24 |
♠J
♥KJT72
♦AJ98
♣J87
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
♠A854
♥Q8
♦T2
♣A9632
|
♠T9763
♥A93
♦K54
♣K4
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ ♣5 ♥6 ♠3 NT6 |
EW: 2♣ 3♠ 1NT ♦6 ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
140 7.00 0.00 2♥ N 3 7-Rainwater-Woodward vs 7-Stansbury-Stansbury
110 6.00 1.00 2♥ N 2 2-Van Zevern-Harder vs 4-Kelley-Elsner
100 5.00 2.00 3♠* E -1 8-Nelson-Nelson vs 1-Silveira-Silveira
50 3.50 3.50 3♠ E -1 4-Hartshorn-Gallegos vs 8-McCalden-McCalden
50 3.50 3.50 2♦ W -1 1-Wheaton-Wheaton vs 3-Shepard-Davis
PASS 2.00 5.00 Pass Out 3-Bagley-Yingst vs 6-McGregor-Huser
140 1.00 6.00 3♠ E 3 5-Imholte-DePuy vs 2-Overgaard-Gill
170 0.00 7.00 3♠ E 4 6-Minson-Porter vs 5-Smith-Smith
|