1 |
♠54
♥QT73
♦AK84
♣J43
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
♠A9
♥A542
♦JT6
♣T652
|
♠KQJ7
♥KJ8
♦753
♣AQ7
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦6 ♥5 ♠6 NT5 |
EW: 2♣ 1♦ 2♥ 1♠ 2NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 2.63 1.38 3N E -1 ♠3 7-Kanekar-Wood vs 3-Casey-Jones
50 2.63 1.38 3N E -1 ♠3 10-Hall-Rouede vs 8-Humphreys-Humphreys
50 2.63 1.38 3N E -1 ♦2 9-Ellery-Ellery vs 2-Deutsch-Zechman
400 0.13 3.88 3N E 3 ♠3 6-Bradley-Rice vs 5-McMahan-Mogilner
|
2 |
♠T52
♥J632
♦Q954
♣96
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
♠K6
♥K87
♦J8732
♣QT4
|
♠AQ98
♥Q94
♦T
♣KJ852
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4 ♦6 ♥6 ♠6 NT6 |
EW: 3♣ 1♦ 1♠ 1NT ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
90 3.88 0.13 1N S 1 ♣4 9-Ellery-Ellery vs 2-Deutsch-Zechman
90 2.63 1.38 2♣ E 2 ♦A 7-Kanekar-Wood vs 3-Casey-Jones
110 1.38 2.63 2♣ E 3 ♦K 6-Bradley-Rice vs 5-McMahan-Mogilner
150 0.13 3.88 1N W 3 ♥2 10-Hall-Rouede vs 8-Humphreys-Humphreys
|
3 |
♠AT4
♥J85
♦JT6
♣T942
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
♠K963
♥AT6
♦853
♣Q87
|
♠Q2
♥KQ942
♦A92
♣AK3
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4 ♦5 ♥3/2 ♠5/4 NT3 |
EW: 3♣ 2♦ 4♥ 2♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
620 2.00 2.00 4♥ E 4 ♥3 9-Ellery-Ellery vs 2-Deutsch-Zechman
620 2.00 2.00 4♥ E 4 ♦K 6-Bradley-Rice vs 5-McMahan-Mogilner
620 2.00 2.00 4♥ E 4 ♦K 7-Kanekar-Wood vs 3-Casey-Jones
620 2.00 2.00 4♥ E 4 ♦K 10-Hall-Rouede vs 8-Humphreys-Humphreys
|
4 |
♠A854
♥2
♦75
♣AK9764
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
♠96
♥KQ43
♦KQJ93
♣T5
|
♠K732
♥JT975
♦8
♣Q83
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 2/1♦ 3♠ 2NT ♥5 |
EW: 2♥ ♣3 ♦5 ♠3 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
120 3.88 0.13 1N S 2 ♦K 1-Zissen-Van Hemert vs 3-Casey-Jones
100 2.00 2.00 3N S -1 ♦K 7-Kanekar-Wood vs 6-Bradley-Rice
100 2.00 2.00 5♣ N -1 ♦8 5-McMahan-Mogilner vs 2-Deutsch-Zechman
300 0.13 3.88 3N S -3 ♦K 8-Humphreys-Humphreys vs 4-Higgins-Good
|
5 |
♠J765
♥742
♦T3
♣KT65
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
♠K82
♥KT65
♦84
♣Q973
|
♠AT3
♥AJ93
♦AJ9
♣A42
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4 ♦6 ♥3 ♠5 NT3 |
EW: 3♣ 1♦ 4♥ 2♠ 4/3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 3.25 0.75 4♥ W -1 ♦T 5-McMahan-Mogilner vs 2-Deutsch-Zechman
50 3.25 0.75 3♥ W -1 ♠5 7-Kanekar-Wood vs 6-Bradley-Rice
140 1.38 2.63 2♥ E 3 ♦K 1-Zissen-Van Hemert vs 3-Casey-Jones
400 0.13 3.88 3N W 3 ♦T 8-Humphreys-Humphreys vs 4-Higgins-Good
|
6 |
♠KJ4
♥AJ86
♦2
♣J7432
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
♠T963
♥KT7
♦AKT6
♣85
|
♠852
♥953
♦QJ984
♣QT
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 1♦ 4♥ 2♠ 2NT |
EW: ♣2 ♦6 ♥2 ♠4 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
800 3.88 0.13 3♦* W -3 ♥A 7-Kanekar-Wood vs 6-Bradley-Rice
400 2.63 1.38 3N S 3 ♦3 8-Humphreys-Humphreys vs 4-Higgins-Good
50 1.38 2.63 4♥ N -1 ♦Q 5-McMahan-Mogilner vs 2-Deutsch-Zechman
100 0.13 3.88 4N S -2 ♦A 1-Zissen-Van Hemert vs 3-Casey-Jones
|
7 |
♠AJ65
♥AJ32
♦J53
♣62
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
♠Q842
♥Q98
♦Q
♣AKJ53
|
♠97
♥64
♦AT964
♣T987
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 3♥ 3♠ 1NT ♣5 |
EW: 2♣ ♦6 ♥3 ♠4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 3.88 0.13 4♣ W -2 ♦J 2-Deutsch-Zechman vs 4-Higgins-Good
170 2.63 1.38 2♥ S 4 ♣A 9-Ellery-Ellery vs 5-McMahan-Mogilner
140 1.38 2.63 1♥ N 3 ♣T 6-Bradley-Rice vs 3-Casey-Jones
110 0.13 3.88 3♣ W 3 ♥A 10-Hall-Rouede vs 1-Zissen-Van Hemert
|
8 |
♠7542
♥JT874
♦K962
♣-
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
♠KJT9
♥KQ
♦75
♣AQ654
|
♠Q8
♥953
♦AQJ83
♣K32
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4 ♦4 ♥6 ♠4 NT3 |
EW: 3♣ 2/3♦ 2♠ 2NT ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 3.88 0.13 3N W -3 ♥7 9-Ellery-Ellery vs 5-McMahan-Mogilner
110 2.63 1.38 2♣ W 3 ♥J 2-Deutsch-Zechman vs 4-Higgins-Good
400 1.38 2.63 3N W 3 ♣J 6-Bradley-Rice vs 3-Casey-Jones
430 0.13 3.88 3N E 4 ♣J 10-Hall-Rouede vs 1-Zissen-Van Hemert
|
9 |
♠2
♥AK64
♦AT5
♣AKT32
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
♠K963
♥QT32
♦QJ4
♣Q8
|
♠AJ8
♥95
♦K9832
♣J64
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 2♥ 1♠ ♦6 NT6 |
EW: 1♦ ♣4 ♥5 ♠6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
130 3.88 0.13 1♣ N 4 ♥5 9-Ellery-Ellery vs 5-McMahan-Mogilner
110 2.63 1.38 1♣ N 3 ♦2 10-Hall-Rouede vs 1-Zissen-Van Hemert
150 0.75 3.25 2N N -3 ♦9 6-Bradley-Rice vs 3-Casey-Jones
150 0.75 3.25 1N N -3 ♥9 2-Deutsch-Zechman vs 4-Higgins-Good
|
10 |
♠2
♥AQ4
♦AKJ95
♣8762
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
♠9763
♥KT9
♦-
♣KQJ954
|
♠AKJ54
♥76532
♦Q2
♣3
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♦ 3NT ♣4 ♥5 ♠4 |
EW: 1♣ 1/2♥ 3♠ ♦2 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 3.88 0.13 4♠ E -2 ♦3 7-Kanekar-Wood vs 4-Higgins-Good
150 2.00 2.00 4♦ S 5 ♥9 10-Hall-Rouede vs 2-Deutsch-Zechman
150 2.00 2.00 4♦ N 5 ♣3 9-Ellery-Ellery vs 8-Humphreys-Humphreys
100 0.13 3.88 4♠ E -1 ♦8 1-Zissen-Van Hemert vs 6-Bradley-Rice
|
11 |
♠A54
♥AKQ2
♦J8752
♣2
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
♠KQT9
♥9743
♦A43
♣A3
|
♠8763
♥85
♦Q
♣KQ8654
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♦ 1♥ ♣4 ♠4 NT6 |
EW: 3♣ 3♠ ♦3 ♥4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 3.25 0.75 2♠ E -1 ♥J 9-Ellery-Ellery vs 8-Humphreys-Humphreys
50 3.25 0.75 2♠ E -1 ♣J 1-Zissen-Van Hemert vs 6-Bradley-Rice
110 1.38 2.63 2♠ E 2 ♣J 7-Kanekar-Wood vs 4-Higgins-Good
420 0.13 3.88 4♠ E 4 ♣J 10-Hall-Rouede vs 2-Deutsch-Zechman
|
12 |
♠JT63
♥KJT3
♦JT
♣AK4
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
♠7
♥AQ8652
♦K974
♣32
|
♠A98542
♥74
♦A83
♣75
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 2NT ♦6 ♥6 ♠6 |
EW: 1♥ ♣4 ♦6 ♠6 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.88 0.13 2♥ W -2 ♦J 9-Ellery-Ellery vs 8-Humphreys-Humphreys
50 2.63 1.38 2♥ W -1 ♣A 1-Zissen-Van Hemert vs 6-Bradley-Rice
200 1.38 2.63 5♣ S -2 ♦4 10-Hall-Rouede vs 2-Deutsch-Zechman
300 0.13 3.88 5♣ S -3 ♥A 7-Kanekar-Wood vs 4-Higgins-Good
|
13 |
♠865
♥J9865
♦Q
♣AJ75
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
♠JT42
♥Q
♦J9632
♣K43
|
♠AKQ93
♥K4
♦T754
♣86
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 5♥ 2NT ♦6 ♠6 |
EW: 1♦ 1♠ ♣2 ♥2 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
650 2.50 1.50 4♥ S 5 ♠J 1-Zissen-Van Hemert vs 9-Ellery-Ellery
650 2.50 1.50 4♥ S 5 ♠J 10-Hall-Rouede vs 3-Casey-Jones
650 2.50 1.50 4♥ N 5 ♠A 2-Deutsch-Zechman vs 7-Kanekar-Wood
650 2.50 1.50 4♥ N 5 ♠A 4-Higgins-Good vs 6-Bradley-Rice
200 0.00 4.00 4♠ E -2 ♦K 8-Humphreys-Humphreys vs 5-McMahan-Mogilner
|
14 |
♠A
♥Q64
♦KJ854
♣QT83
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
♠J65
♥AKJ952
♦76
♣J7
|
♠K8743
♥T
♦Q93
♣A654
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 3♦ 3NT ♥6 ♠6 |
EW: 1♥ ♣4 ♦3 ♠6 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 4.00 0.00 3♦ N 3 ♥T 10-Hall-Rouede vs 3-Casey-Jones
50 2.50 1.50 4♦ N -1 ♥T 4-Higgins-Good vs 6-Bradley-Rice
50 2.50 1.50 3♦ N -1 ♥T 8-Humphreys-Humphreys vs 5-McMahan-Mogilner
110 0.50 3.50 2♥ W 2 ♠A 2-Deutsch-Zechman vs 7-Kanekar-Wood
110 0.50 3.50 2♥ W 2 ♦5 1-Zissen-Van Hemert vs 9-Ellery-Ellery
|
15 |
♠753
♥J32
♦AT54
♣T62
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
♠Q4
♥AQT98
♦Q98
♣AJ3
|
♠AKT962
♥K75
♦J7
♣95
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6 ♦5 ♥1 ♠1 NT1 |
EW: 1♣ 2♦ 5♥ 5♠ 5NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
450 4.00 0.00 4♥ W 5 ♣2 4-Higgins-Good vs 6-Bradley-Rice
480 1.50 2.50 4♠ W 6 1-Zissen-Van Hemert vs 9-Ellery-Ellery
480 1.50 2.50 4♠ E 6 ♣K 8-Humphreys-Humphreys vs 5-McMahan-Mogilner
480 1.50 2.50 4♥ W 6 ♠3 10-Hall-Rouede vs 3-Casey-Jones
480 1.50 2.50 4♥ W 6 ♣T 2-Deutsch-Zechman vs 7-Kanekar-Wood
|
16 |
♠K95
♥QT73
♦KJT
♣J76
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
♠T84
♥A965
♦A762
♣42
|
♠A3
♥KJ84
♦Q3
♣AKT83
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦5 ♥2/1 ♠6 NT3 |
EW: 4♣ 2♦ 5♥ 1♠ 2NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.00 0.00 4♥ E -1 ♠6 10-Hall-Rouede vs 4-Higgins-Good
170 3.00 1.00 3♥ W 4 ♣6 9-Ellery-Ellery vs 6-Bradley-Rice
620 2.00 2.00 4♥ W 4 ♦J 3-Casey-Jones vs 8-Humphreys-Humphreys
630 1.00 3.00 3N E 4 ♠6 5-McMahan-Mogilner vs 7-Kanekar-Wood
990 0.00 4.00 4♥* W 5 2-Deutsch-Zechman vs 1-Zissen-Van Hemert
|
17 |
♠K762
♥Q32
♦AQT64
♣5
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
♠Q983
♥84
♦KJ8
♣KQJ3
|
♠4
♥T76
♦972
♣T97642
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 7♦ 7♥ 6♠ 7NT |
EW: ♣6 ♦0 ♥0 ♠1 NT0 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
510 4.00 0.00 4♥ S 7 ♥8 3-Casey-Jones vs 8-Humphreys-Humphreys
450 2.50 1.50 4♠ S 5 ♣K 9-Ellery-Ellery vs 6-Bradley-Rice
450 2.50 1.50 4♠ N 5 ♣7 5-McMahan-Mogilner vs 7-Kanekar-Wood
430 1.00 3.00 4N S 4 ♣K 2-Deutsch-Zechman vs 1-Zissen-Van Hemert
260 0.00 4.00 3♠ N 7 ♣T 10-Hall-Rouede vs 4-Higgins-Good
|
18 |
♠K732
♥AT6
♦KT3
♣Q54
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
♠AQJ8
♥J9
♦8752
♣862
|
♠54
♥Q843
♦AQ64
♣K93
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 1♦ 2♥ 2/1♠ 2NT |
EW: ♣5 ♦6 ♥5 ♠5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 4.00 0.00 1N N 3 ♠5 9-Ellery-Ellery vs 6-Bradley-Rice
120 3.00 1.00 1N N 2 ♦7 3-Casey-Jones vs 8-Humphreys-Humphreys
90 2.00 2.00 1N S 1 ♥4 5-McMahan-Mogilner vs 7-Kanekar-Wood
200 1.00 3.00 2♣ N -2 ♥3 2-Deutsch-Zechman vs 1-Zissen-Van Hemert
300 0.00 4.00 3N S -3 ♥J 10-Hall-Rouede vs 4-Higgins-Good
|
19 |
♠76543
♥7
♦A642
♣K52
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
♠KT
♥QJT954
♦J97
♣J4
|
♠9
♥A632
♦KQT85
♣AT9
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 4♠ ♦4 ♥4 NT6 |
EW: 3♦ 3♥ 1NT ♣4 ♠3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 2.50 1.50 4♠ S 4 ♥Q 1-Zissen-Van Hemert vs 7-Kanekar-Wood
420 2.50 1.50 4♠ S 4 ♥Q 3-Casey-Jones vs 2-Deutsch-Zechman
420 2.50 1.50 4♠ S 4 ♥Q 4-Higgins-Good vs 9-Ellery-Ellery
420 2.50 1.50 4♠ S 4 ♦7 10-Hall-Rouede vs 5-McMahan-Mogilner
200 0.00 4.00 5♥* W -1 ♠7 6-Bradley-Rice vs 8-Humphreys-Humphreys
|
20 |
♠975
♥KQ653
♦K52
♣A7
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
♠QT62
♥A74
♦T43
♣642
|
♠A43
♥J9
♦987
♣Q9853
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 5♦ 5♥ 2♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦2 ♥2 ♠4 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
650 3.00 1.00 4♥ N 5 ♠A 1-Zissen-Van Hemert vs 7-Kanekar-Wood
650 3.00 1.00 4♥ N 5 ♠A 10-Hall-Rouede vs 5-McMahan-Mogilner
650 3.00 1.00 4♥ N 5 ♣5 3-Casey-Jones vs 2-Deutsch-Zechman
620 0.50 3.50 4♥ N 4 ♥9 6-Bradley-Rice vs 8-Humphreys-Humphreys
620 0.50 3.50 4♥ N 4 ♣9 4-Higgins-Good vs 9-Ellery-Ellery
|
21 |
♠3
♥9732
♦JT865
♣T86
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
♠AK9874
♥AJ4
♦73
♣42
|
♠J2
♥Q8
♦KQ94
♣AQ975
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦5 ♥6 ♠2 NT3/2 |
EW: 3♣ 2/1♦ 1♥ 5/4♠ 4/3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.00 0.00 4♠ W -2 ♦J 1-Zissen-Van Hemert vs 7-Kanekar-Wood
50 3.00 1.00 4♠ W -1 ♥2 10-Hall-Rouede vs 5-McMahan-Mogilner
170 2.00 2.00 2♠ W 4 ♥7 3-Casey-Jones vs 2-Deutsch-Zechman
420 0.50 3.50 4♠ W 4 ♥9 4-Higgins-Good vs 9-Ellery-Ellery
420 0.50 3.50 4♠ W 4 ♦J 6-Bradley-Rice vs 8-Humphreys-Humphreys
|
22 |
♠J7543
♥752
♦K7
♣Q87
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
♠AK2
♥Q96
♦AJ9
♣6542
|
♠QT
♥KJ84
♦QT865
♣T3
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♠ ♦3 ♥4 NT6 |
EW: 3♦ 3♥ 1NT ♣6 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
80 3.50 0.50 1♠ N 1 ♥4 4-Higgins-Good vs 3-Casey-Jones
80 3.50 0.50 1♠ N 1 ♥4 7-Kanekar-Wood vs 9-Ellery-Ellery
150 1.50 2.50 1N W 3 ♠4 5-McMahan-Mogilner vs 1-Zissen-Van Hemert
150 1.50 2.50 1N W 3 ♠4 10-Hall-Rouede vs 6-Bradley-Rice
180 0.00 4.00 1N W 4 ♠4 2-Deutsch-Zechman vs 8-Humphreys-Humphreys
|
23 |
♠JT43
♥T654
♦Q4
♣T98
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
♠AKQ9
♥AQ3
♦5
♣Q6542
|
♠8
♥K9
♦KJT962
♣AKJ7
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣1 ♦1 ♥3 ♠2 NT1 |
EW: 6♣ 6♦ 4♥ 5♠ 6NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
660 3.50 0.50 3N W 5 ♥4 7-Kanekar-Wood vs 9-Ellery-Ellery
660 3.50 0.50 3N E 5 ♥2 5-McMahan-Mogilner vs 1-Zissen-Van Hemert
690 1.50 2.50 4N W 6 ♠3 2-Deutsch-Zechman vs 8-Humphreys-Humphreys
690 1.50 2.50 3N W 6 ♣T 4-Higgins-Good vs 3-Casey-Jones
1440 0.00 4.00 6N W 6 ♠3 10-Hall-Rouede vs 6-Bradley-Rice
|
24 |
♠AKQ64
♥9
♦982
♣8732
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
♠JT7
♥A763
♦QJT
♣AQT
|
♠852
♥QJ82
♦7653
♣K5
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 2♠ 1NT ♦6 ♥6 |
EW: ♣4 ♦6 ♥6 ♠5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
470 4.00 0.00 2♠* N 2 ♣K 7-Kanekar-Wood vs 9-Ellery-Ellery
110 3.00 1.00 2♠ N 2 ♥2 4-Higgins-Good vs 3-Casey-Jones
100 2.00 2.00 1N E -2 ♠9 2-Deutsch-Zechman vs 8-Humphreys-Humphreys
50 1.00 3.00 2♥ E -1 ♦A 10-Hall-Rouede vs 6-Bradley-Rice
110 0.00 4.00 2♥ E 2 ♣4 5-McMahan-Mogilner vs 1-Zissen-Van Hemert
|
25 |
♠QJ5
♥AKJ6
♦Q
♣AJT65
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
♠A3
♥982
♦762
♣Q9874
|
♠T76
♥Q73
♦AJ943
♣K3
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♦ 3♥ 4♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣5 ♦5 ♥3 ♠3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
430 3.88 0.13 3N S 4 ♦7 8-Humphreys-Humphreys vs 1-Zissen-Van Hemert
110 2.63 1.38 2♥ N 2 ♠7 10-Hall-Rouede vs 7-Kanekar-Wood
50 0.75 3.25 4♠ S -1 ♦7 3-Casey-Jones vs 9-Ellery-Ellery
50 0.75 3.25 3♠ S -1 ♦7 5-McMahan-Mogilner vs 4-Higgins-Good
|
26 |
♠Q965
♥A53
♦75
♣A952
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
♠AJT3
♥KJT74
♦83
♣K7
|
♠K8742
♥8
♦AT6
♣8643
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 3♦ 1♥ 2NT ♠5 |
EW: 2♠ ♣5 ♦4 ♥5 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
870 3.88 0.13 3♦* S 4 ♥J 5-McMahan-Mogilner vs 4-Higgins-Good
130 2.63 1.38 2♦ S 4 ♣K 3-Casey-Jones vs 9-Ellery-Ellery
110 1.38 2.63 2♦ S 3 ♥J 10-Hall-Rouede vs 7-Kanekar-Wood
100 0.13 3.88 3N N -1 ♥9 8-Humphreys-Humphreys vs 1-Zissen-Van Hemert
|
27 |
♠AT94
♥-
♦KQT764
♣J73
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
♠K65
♥QJ86
♦9
♣98642
|
♠QJ2
♥7432
♦853
♣KT5
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 6♦ 3♥ 4♠ 5NT |
EW: ♣5 ♦1 ♥4 ♠2 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
490 3.25 0.75 3N S 6 ♣4 3-Casey-Jones vs 9-Ellery-Ellery
490 3.25 0.75 3N S 6 ♣4 10-Hall-Rouede vs 7-Kanekar-Wood
430 1.38 2.63 3N N 4 ♠Q 8-Humphreys-Humphreys vs 1-Zissen-Van Hemert
400 0.13 3.88 5♦ N 5 ♥2 5-McMahan-Mogilner vs 4-Higgins-Good
|