1 |
♠KQ2
♥KJ2
♦3
♣AQJ954
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
♠JT6
♥AT97
♦A9642
♣7
|
♠A73
♥Q86
♦K87
♣KT63
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6 ♦5 ♥4 ♠6 NT5 |
EW: 1♣ 2♦ 2/3♥ 1♠ 2NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 3.25 0.75 2N E -1 ♣8 7-Emer-Lemery vs 3-Calise-Calise
50 3.25 0.75 2N E -1 ♣8 9-Taylor-Hsieh vs 2-Gibson-Dempsey
100 1.38 2.63 2♣* N -1 ♥J 6-Goodsell-Blackwell vs 5-Sullivan-Granby
250 0.13 3.88 3♣ N -5 10-Kanekar-Mathur vs 8-Zissen-Van Hemert
|
2 |
♠KJT643
♥976
♦K7
♣95
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
♠Q
♥J83
♦JT962
♣KQ43
|
♠A7
♥AKQ52
♦83
♣AT82
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♠ ♣2 ♦4 ♥2 NT3 |
EW: 5♣ 3♦ 5♥ 4NT ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 3.88 0.13 3♥ E 4 ♣J 9-Taylor-Hsieh vs 2-Gibson-Dempsey
450 1.38 2.63 4♥ E 5 ♠9 6-Goodsell-Blackwell vs 5-Sullivan-Granby
450 1.38 2.63 4♥ E 5 ♠9 10-Kanekar-Mathur vs 8-Zissen-Van Hemert
450 1.38 2.63 4♥ E 5 ♣6 7-Emer-Lemery vs 3-Calise-Calise
|
3 |
♠Q9
♥AKJ8
♦KQ2
♣AT43
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
♠53
♥Q54
♦AJT953
♣87
|
♠AKJT76
♥92
♦8764
♣2
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 5♥ ♦5 ♠5 NT6 |
EW: 2♦ 1♠ ♣2 ♥1 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
800 3.25 0.75 5♦* W -3 ♥A 6-Goodsell-Blackwell vs 5-Sullivan-Granby
800 3.25 0.75 5♦* W -3 ♣A 10-Kanekar-Mathur vs 8-Zissen-Van Hemert
450 1.38 2.63 4♥ N 5 ♠A 9-Taylor-Hsieh vs 2-Gibson-Dempsey
170 0.13 3.88 3♥ N 4 ♠A 7-Emer-Lemery vs 3-Calise-Calise
|
4 |
♠9
♥T8753
♦AKQ7
♣Q73
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
♠KQ8632
♥QJ62
♦4
♣J6
|
♠JT54
♥A94
♦J65
♣AK5
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 3♦ ♥5 ♠2 NT6 |
EW: 1♥ 4♠ 1NT ♣4 ♦3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 3.88 0.13 2♠ E 4 ♦A 8-Zissen-Van Hemert vs 4-Bradley-Mercer
620 1.38 2.63 4♠ W 4 ♦A 1-Casey-Jones vs 3-Calise-Calise
620 1.38 2.63 4♠ W 4 ♦A 5-Sullivan-Granby vs 2-Gibson-Dempsey
620 1.38 2.63 4♠ W 4 ♦K 7-Emer-Lemery vs 6-Goodsell-Blackwell
|
5 |
♠73
♥T54
♦J973
♣9832
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
♠T
♥AKQJ872
♦T52
♣76
|
♠AKQ9854
♥6
♦AKQ
♣KT
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6 ♦3 ♥0 ♠0 NT0 |
EW: 1♣ 4/3♦ 6/5♥ 6/5♠ 6/2NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 3.88 0.13 6♠ W -1 ♣9 5-Sullivan-Granby vs 2-Gibson-Dempsey
450 2.63 1.38 4♠ E 5 ♥9 8-Zissen-Van Hemert vs 4-Bradley-Mercer
1010 0.75 3.25 6♠ W 7 ♦9 1-Casey-Jones vs 3-Calise-Calise
1010 0.75 3.25 6♥ W 7 ♦3 7-Emer-Lemery vs 6-Goodsell-Blackwell
|
6 |
♠AQ984
♥KJ953
♦96
♣4
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
♠J
♥T86
♦T84
♣KQJ932
|
♠KT732
♥AQ4
♦KJ
♣T87
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 3/2♥ 2♠ 1NT ♣4 |
EW: 2♣ ♦4 ♥4 ♠5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
400 3.88 0.13 3N E -4 ♦4 8-Zissen-Van Hemert vs 4-Bradley-Mercer
50 1.38 2.63 3♦ S -1 ♠J 1-Casey-Jones vs 3-Calise-Calise
50 1.38 2.63 3♦ S -1 ♠J 5-Sullivan-Granby vs 2-Gibson-Dempsey
50 1.38 2.63 3♦ S -1 ♠J 7-Emer-Lemery vs 6-Goodsell-Blackwell
|
7 |
♠53
♥T2
♦KQJ82
♣J932
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
♠KT72
♥AQJ7
♦95
♣Q64
|
♠AQ8
♥63
♦T743
♣AKT5
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣2 ♦5 ♥4 ♠2 NT2 |
EW: 4♣ 2♦ 3♥ 4♠ 2NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.88 0.13 3N E -1 ♦A 2-Gibson-Dempsey vs 4-Bradley-Mercer
180 2.63 1.38 2N E 4 ♥6 10-Kanekar-Mathur vs 1-Casey-Jones
600 1.38 2.63 3N E 3 ♠4 9-Taylor-Hsieh vs 5-Sullivan-Granby
630 0.13 3.88 3N E 4 ♥5 6-Goodsell-Blackwell vs 3-Calise-Calise
|
8 |
♠T
♥KQ75
♦JT85
♣J754
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
♠KJ53
♥984
♦A42
♣AQ9
|
♠84
♥AJ3
♦KQ9763
♣K8
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦2/1 ♥5/4 ♠5 NT1 |
EW: 2♣ 5♦ 2♥ 2♠ 5NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
130 3.88 0.13 3♦ E 4 ♣6 10-Kanekar-Mathur vs 1-Casey-Jones
400 2.63 1.38 5♦ E 5 ♥T 6-Goodsell-Blackwell vs 3-Calise-Calise
430 1.38 2.63 3N E 4 2-Gibson-Dempsey vs 4-Bradley-Mercer
490 0.13 3.88 3N W 6 ♠T 9-Taylor-Hsieh vs 5-Sullivan-Granby
|
9 |
♠QJ5
♥JT8762
♦96
♣97
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
♠8742
♥KQ3
♦QJ
♣KJ83
|
♠AT3
♥4
♦AKT872
♣T42
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ ♣3/4 ♦3 ♠4 NT4 |
EW: 3♣ 3♦ 2♠ 3NT ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.88 0.13 3♥ N -2 ♦A 2-Gibson-Dempsey vs 4-Bradley-Mercer
110 2.63 1.38 3♦ E 3 ♦3 6-Goodsell-Blackwell vs 3-Calise-Calise
630 1.38 2.63 3N W 4 ♥J 9-Taylor-Hsieh vs 5-Sullivan-Granby
1150 0.13 3.88 3N* W 5 ♥7 10-Kanekar-Mathur vs 1-Casey-Jones
|
10 |
♠KT6532
♥Q5
♦AJ92
♣A
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
♠AQ
♥T983
♦74
♣KT632
|
♠9874
♥J2
♦KQ86
♣J74
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ 3/2♥ 3♠ 1NT ♣6 |
EW: 1♣ ♦4 ♥4 ♠4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 3.88 0.13 2♠ N 4 ♦5 1-Casey-Jones vs 6-Goodsell-Blackwell
140 2.63 1.38 2♠ N 3 ♣7 9-Taylor-Hsieh vs 8-Zissen-Van Hemert
100 1.38 2.63 3N N -1 ♦6 10-Kanekar-Mathur vs 2-Gibson-Dempsey
200 0.13 3.88 3N S -2 ♣3 7-Emer-Lemery vs 4-Bradley-Mercer
|
11 |
♠J76
♥QJ95
♦T42
♣AJ7
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
♠QT3
♥A64
♦QJ983
♣65
|
♠K5
♥KT873
♦75
♣9843
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 1♦ 1♥ 3♠ 2NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦6 ♥6 ♠3 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
450 3.88 0.13 4♠ S 5 ♦Q 10-Kanekar-Mathur vs 2-Gibson-Dempsey
420 2.63 1.38 4♠ S 4 ♦Q 9-Taylor-Hsieh vs 8-Zissen-Van Hemert
170 0.75 3.25 2♠ S 4 ♦Q 1-Casey-Jones vs 6-Goodsell-Blackwell
170 0.75 3.25 2♠ S 4 ♦J 7-Emer-Lemery vs 4-Bradley-Mercer
|
12 |
♠8532
♥AJ8
♦JT3
♣J32
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
♠A
♥932
♦A92
♣QT9754
|
♠KQJ
♥KQ6
♦K875
♣AK8
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣1 ♦2 ♥3/2 ♠5 NT1 |
EW: 6♣ 5♦ 4♥ 2♠ 6NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
460 3.88 0.13 3N E 5 ♠6 10-Kanekar-Mathur vs 2-Gibson-Dempsey
490 2.00 2.00 3N E 6 ♠T 7-Emer-Lemery vs 4-Bradley-Mercer
490 2.00 2.00 3N E 6 ♠6 9-Taylor-Hsieh vs 8-Zissen-Van Hemert
920 0.13 3.88 6♣ W 6 ♦J 1-Casey-Jones vs 6-Goodsell-Blackwell
|
13 |
♠4
♥852
♦JT9642
♣843
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
♠952
♥AQ94
♦K8
♣KQ76
|
♠AQJ873
♥K3
♦53
♣AJ2
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣2 ♦5 ♥3 ♠2 NT2 |
EW: 5♣ 2♦ 4♥ 5♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
650 3.50 0.50 4♠ E 5 ♥J 1-Casey-Jones vs 9-Taylor-Hsieh
650 3.50 0.50 4♠ E 5 ♣T 8-Zissen-Van Hemert vs 5-Sullivan-Granby
680 1.00 3.00 5♠ E 6 ♥J 2-Gibson-Dempsey vs 7-Emer-Lemery
680 1.00 3.00 4♠ E 6 ♥J 10-Kanekar-Mathur vs 3-Calise-Calise
680 1.00 3.00 4♠ E 6 ♣T 4-Bradley-Mercer vs 6-Goodsell-Blackwell
|
14 |
♠AQ942
♥J865
♦AJ5
♣7
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
♠T7
♥AK3
♦T874
♣Q842
|
♠K8653
♥742
♦KQ63
♣6
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 2♥ 1♠ 1/-NT ♦6/5 NT7/6 |
EW: 1♦ ♣4 ♥5 ♠6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
400 4.00 0.00 3N N 3 ♦3 1-Casey-Jones vs 9-Taylor-Hsieh
110 3.00 1.00 3♣ S 3 ♥A 4-Bradley-Mercer vs 6-Goodsell-Blackwell
50 1.50 2.50 3N N -1 ♦K 10-Kanekar-Mathur vs 3-Calise-Calise
50 1.50 2.50 3N N -1 ♦3 8-Zissen-Van Hemert vs 5-Sullivan-Granby
100 0.00 4.00 3N N -2 ♦3 2-Gibson-Dempsey vs 7-Emer-Lemery
|
15 |
♠JT92
♥AK5432
♦5
♣94
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
♠Q743
♥J8
♦AQ
♣J8632
|
♠K65
♥T6
♦KJT74
♣KQ7
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♥ 2NT ♣4 ♦5 ♠6 |
EW: 2♣ 2♦ 1♠ ♥3 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 4.00 0.00 3♠ W -4 ♦5 4-Bradley-Mercer vs 6-Goodsell-Blackwell
170 2.50 1.50 3♥ N 4 ♦J 8-Zissen-Van Hemert vs 5-Sullivan-Granby
170 2.50 1.50 2♥ N 4 ♣K 1-Casey-Jones vs 9-Taylor-Hsieh
150 1.00 3.00 4♠ W -3 ♥A 2-Gibson-Dempsey vs 7-Emer-Lemery
100 0.00 4.00 3♠ W -2 ♥A 10-Kanekar-Mathur vs 3-Calise-Calise
|
16 |
♠K9732
♥J7
♦J5
♣AJ32
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
♠T54
♥AT43
♦942
♣K98
|
♠QJ86
♥Q2
♦AK83
♣QT5
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6 ♦6/5 ♥6 ♠6 NT5 |
EW: 1♦ 1♠ 2NT ♣6 ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.50 0.50 2N W -1 ♠2 3-Calise-Calise vs 8-Zissen-Van Hemert
100 3.50 0.50 2N W -1 ♥J 10-Kanekar-Mathur vs 4-Bradley-Mercer
120 1.00 3.00 2N W 2 ♥J 2-Gibson-Dempsey vs 1-Casey-Jones
120 1.00 3.00 1N W 2 ♠4 9-Taylor-Hsieh vs 6-Goodsell-Blackwell
120 1.00 3.00 1N E 2 ♠A 5-Sullivan-Granby vs 7-Emer-Lemery
|
17 |
♠AKT3
♥KJT
♦KQ
♣T765
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
♠J
♥Q32
♦A9853
♣KJ98
|
♠Q87654
♥54
♦J2
♣432
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 2/3♦ 5♥ 2♠ 4/5NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦3 ♥2 ♠5 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 3.00 1.00 4♥ S 4 ♠J 2-Gibson-Dempsey vs 1-Casey-Jones
420 3.00 1.00 4♥ N 4 ♠8 5-Sullivan-Granby vs 7-Emer-Lemery
420 3.00 1.00 4♥ N 4 ♠6 9-Taylor-Hsieh vs 6-Goodsell-Blackwell
50 0.50 3.50 4♥ N -1 ♠6 10-Kanekar-Mathur vs 4-Bradley-Mercer
50 0.50 3.50 4♥ N -1 ♠4 3-Calise-Calise vs 8-Zissen-Van Hemert
|
18 |
♠K853
♥KQ2
♦QJT9
♣T4
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
♠AQ9
♥AJ7
♦K76
♣QJ83
|
♠76
♥T9865
♦43
♣K765
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 2♠ ♣5 ♥5 NT6 |
EW: 2♣ 2♥ 1NT ♦5 ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.00 0.00 3♦ N -1 ♣5 2-Gibson-Dempsey vs 1-Casey-Jones
110 1.50 2.50 2♥ W 2 ♦Q 3-Calise-Calise vs 8-Zissen-Van Hemert
110 1.50 2.50 2♥ W 2 ♦Q 5-Sullivan-Granby vs 7-Emer-Lemery
110 1.50 2.50 2♥ W 2 ♦Q 9-Taylor-Hsieh vs 6-Goodsell-Blackwell
110 1.50 2.50 2♥ W 2 ♦Q 10-Kanekar-Mathur vs 4-Bradley-Mercer
|
19 |
♠K954
♥94
♦K9
♣JT854
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
♠AT62
♥JT87
♦QJ7
♣A3
|
♠QJ73
♥AK3
♦A865
♣K9
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6 ♦3 ♥3 ♠3 NT3 |
EW: 1♣ 3♦ 3♥ 4♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 4.00 0.00 6♠ E -2 ♠8 10-Kanekar-Mathur vs 5-Sullivan-Granby
620 2.00 2.00 4♠ E 4 ♥2 1-Casey-Jones vs 7-Emer-Lemery
620 2.00 2.00 4♠ E 4 ♥2 3-Calise-Calise vs 2-Gibson-Dempsey
620 2.00 2.00 4♠ E 4 ♣2 6-Goodsell-Blackwell vs 8-Zissen-Van Hemert
1430 0.00 4.00 6♠ E 6 ♥2 4-Bradley-Mercer vs 9-Taylor-Hsieh
|
20 |
♠AT72
♥A975
♦J32
♣Q7
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
♠KQJ6
♥KQ2
♦T6
♣T862
|
♠953
♥T4
♦A985
♣AKJ3
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ ♣4 ♦6 ♠5 NT5 |
EW: 3♣ 1♦ 2♠ 2NT ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 4.00 0.00 2♥ S 2 ♦T 10-Kanekar-Mathur vs 5-Sullivan-Granby
110 3.00 1.00 2♣ W 3 ♦J 3-Calise-Calise vs 2-Gibson-Dempsey
130 2.00 2.00 3♣ E 4 ♥3 1-Casey-Jones vs 7-Emer-Lemery
150 1.00 3.00 1N E 3 ♦K 4-Bradley-Mercer vs 9-Taylor-Hsieh
170 0.00 4.00 1♠ W 4 ♣Q 6-Goodsell-Blackwell vs 8-Zissen-Van Hemert
|
21 |
♠6532
♥K32
♦A983
♣64
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
♠KJT7
♥Q654
♦QJ
♣T53
|
♠A94
♥JT8
♦K4
♣AK872
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ ♣4 ♥4 ♠4 NT4 |
EW: 3♣ 2♥ 3♠ 1NT ♦5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.00 0.00 3N E -2 ♦7 1-Casey-Jones vs 7-Emer-Lemery
50 2.50 1.50 2N E -1 ♦5 4-Bradley-Mercer vs 9-Taylor-Hsieh
50 2.50 1.50 2N E -1 ♦5 6-Goodsell-Blackwell vs 8-Zissen-Van Hemert
150 1.00 3.00 2N E 3 ♥7 3-Calise-Calise vs 2-Gibson-Dempsey
400 0.00 4.00 3N E 3 ♥6 10-Kanekar-Mathur vs 5-Sullivan-Granby
|
22 |
♠AQ842
♥Q82
♦KJ93
♣4
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
♠T965
♥97
♦AQ65
♣KJT
|
♠KJ
♥JT643
♦742
♣763
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4/3♣ 3♦ 2♥ 4♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣3 ♦4 ♥4 ♠3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
400 3.50 0.50 3N S 3 ♦5 4-Bradley-Mercer vs 3-Calise-Calise
400 3.50 0.50 3N S 3 ♦5 7-Emer-Lemery vs 9-Taylor-Hsieh
150 2.00 2.00 2N N 3 ♥J 5-Sullivan-Granby vs 1-Casey-Jones
50 1.00 3.00 3N N -1 ♥J 10-Kanekar-Mathur vs 6-Goodsell-Blackwell
150 0.00 4.00 4♠ N -3 2-Gibson-Dempsey vs 8-Zissen-Van Hemert
|
23 |
♠K53
♥86
♦AJT83
♣AT9
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
♠AQJT2
♥A53
♦72
♣K87
|
♠8
♥K942
♦K65
♣QJ653
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣2 ♦6 ♥4 ♠3 NT5 |
EW: 5♣ 1♦ 3♥ 3♠ 2NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.50 0.50 2N E -1 ♦Q 7-Emer-Lemery vs 9-Taylor-Hsieh
100 3.50 0.50 3♣ W -1 ♥8 4-Bradley-Mercer vs 3-Calise-Calise
110 2.00 2.00 2♠ W 2 ♥8 5-Sullivan-Granby vs 1-Casey-Jones
140 1.00 3.00 3♥ E 3 ♦Q 10-Kanekar-Mathur vs 6-Goodsell-Blackwell
170 0.00 4.00 2♠ W 4 ♥8 2-Gibson-Dempsey vs 8-Zissen-Van Hemert
|
24 |
♠J3
♥K5
♦AKJT865
♣96
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
♠KQ4
♥Q9
♦Q92
♣T7542
|
♠A8
♥A87632
♦74
♣KQ3
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ 2♠ 2NT ♣5 ♥5 |
EW: 1♣ 2♥ ♦4 ♠5 NT4/5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 4.00 0.00 3♠ S 3 ♥Q 4-Bradley-Mercer vs 3-Calise-Calise
110 3.00 1.00 3♦ N 3 ♥A 7-Emer-Lemery vs 9-Taylor-Hsieh
50 1.00 3.00 4♦ N -1 ♠A 5-Sullivan-Granby vs 1-Casey-Jones
50 1.00 3.00 4♦ N -1 ♣K 10-Kanekar-Mathur vs 6-Goodsell-Blackwell
50 1.00 3.00 4♦ N -1 2-Gibson-Dempsey vs 8-Zissen-Van Hemert
|
25 |
♠AKJ
♥AT32
♦Q2
♣KJ64
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
♠Q97
♥6
♦JT976
♣AQ72
|
♠T8632
♥8754
♦43
♣98
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 4♦ 6♥ 4♠ 6NT |
EW: ♣2 ♦3 ♥1 ♠3 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
450 2.63 1.38 4♥ S 5 ♠7 10-Kanekar-Mathur vs 7-Emer-Lemery
450 2.63 1.38 4♥ S 5 ♦J 3-Calise-Calise vs 9-Taylor-Hsieh
450 2.63 1.38 4♥ S 5 ♦J 8-Zissen-Van Hemert vs 1-Casey-Jones
420 0.13 3.88 4♥ S 4 ♦J 5-Sullivan-Granby vs 4-Bradley-Mercer
|
26 |
♠AQ987
♥A986
♦94
♣42
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
♠KJT3
♥-
♦K875
♣AJT95
|
♠42
♥KQJT2
♦T63
♣K73
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: -/1♥ -/1♠ ♣5 ♦5/6 ♥5/7 ♠6/7 NT4/6 |
EW: 2♣ 1♦ -/1♥ -/1♠ 1NT ♥6/7 ♠6/7 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
300 3.25 0.75 3♦ W -3 ♣4 5-Sullivan-Granby vs 4-Bradley-Mercer
300 3.25 0.75 3♣ W -3 ♦9 10-Kanekar-Mathur vs 7-Emer-Lemery
100 1.38 2.63 3♣ W -1 ♦9 8-Zissen-Van Hemert vs 1-Casey-Jones
120 0.13 3.88 2N W 2 ♥6 3-Calise-Calise vs 9-Taylor-Hsieh
|
27 |
♠862
♥KJT5
♦97
♣K952
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
♠Q94
♥A97
♦AQT6
♣QJ7
|
♠AJT5
♥Q42
♦J54
♣643
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6 ♦4 ♥5 ♠4 NT4 |
EW: 1♣ 3♦ 2♥ 3♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 3.88 0.13 2N W -1 ♥5 10-Kanekar-Mathur vs 7-Emer-Lemery
120 1.38 2.63 2N W 2 ♥J 3-Calise-Calise vs 9-Taylor-Hsieh
120 1.38 2.63 2N W 2 ♣2 5-Sullivan-Granby vs 4-Bradley-Mercer
120 1.38 2.63 2N W 2 8-Zissen-Van Hemert vs 1-Casey-Jones
|