1 |
♠J65
♥K87
♦A4
♣AQJ96
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
♠AQ4
♥QJ92
♦K98
♣KT8
|
♠K8732
♥A653
♦J5
♣42
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ ♣6 ♥3 ♠3 NT3 |
EW: 4♥ 3/4♠ 3/4NT ♣6 ♦5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 4.00 0.00 3♦ S -1 ♥2 5-Crawford-McMahan vs 3-Klein-Curwin
150 3.00 1.00 1N N -3 ♥3 6-Camins-Cree vs 5-Rice-Hackstock
170 2.00 2.00 3♠ E 4 ♣7 3-Berton, Jr-Farnham vs 4-Knode-Schaffner
200 1.00 3.00 3N N -4 ♠3 4-Urben-Comstock vs 6-Machada-Lucier
250 0.00 4.00 3N N -5 ♠3 1-Weiss-Hampton vs 1-Metosky-Claymon
|
2 |
♠KQ3
♥6
♦8742
♣KJT42
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
♠JT542
♥KQ
♦J65
♣987
|
♠A97
♥A98753
♦KQT
♣A
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ ♦6 ♥3 ♠3 NT5 |
EW: 1♦ 4♥ 4♠ 1NT ♣5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 4.00 0.00 4♥ E -1 ♣3 5-Crawford-McMahan vs 3-Klein-Curwin
170 1.50 2.50 3♥ E 4 ♠6 1-Weiss-Hampton vs 1-Metosky-Claymon
170 1.50 2.50 2♥ E 4 ♦A 4-Urben-Comstock vs 6-Machada-Lucier
170 1.50 2.50 2♥ E 4 ♣3 3-Berton, Jr-Farnham vs 4-Knode-Schaffner
170 1.50 2.50 1♥ E 4 ♠6 6-Camins-Cree vs 5-Rice-Hackstock
|
3 |
♠A4
♥A8
♦JT974
♣JT84
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
♠QT762
♥KQ5
♦AQ
♣975
|
♠K953
♥J974
♦K32
♣K6
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 2♦ ♥5 ♠4 NT6 |
EW: 2♥ 2♠ 1NT ♣5 ♦5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.50 0.50 4♠ W -1 ♥A 4-Urben-Comstock vs 6-Machada-Lucier
100 3.50 0.50 4♠ W -1 ♦J 6-Camins-Cree vs 5-Rice-Hackstock
110 2.00 2.00 2♠ W 2 ♦J 5-Crawford-McMahan vs 3-Klein-Curwin
140 1.00 3.00 3♠ W 3 ♦J 1-Weiss-Hampton vs 1-Metosky-Claymon
620 0.00 4.00 4♠ W 4 ♥A 3-Berton, Jr-Farnham vs 4-Knode-Schaffner
|
4 |
♠9532
♥A4
♦AT75
♣J92
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
♠AQT6
♥KT953
♦2
♣T63
|
♠K84
♥62
♦K984
♣AK85
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1/-♦ ♣4 ♦7/6 ♥4 ♠4 NT5 |
EW: 3♣ 3♥ 3/2♠ 2NT ♦6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 4.00 0.00 2N E -2 ♦3 5-Crawford-McMahan vs 3-Klein-Curwin
100 3.00 1.00 3N E -1 ♦J 6-Camins-Cree vs 5-Rice-Hackstock
110 2.00 2.00 2♥ W 2 ♠3 3-Berton, Jr-Farnham vs 4-Knode-Schaffner
140 0.50 3.50 2♠ W 3 ♥A 4-Urben-Comstock vs 6-Machada-Lucier
140 0.50 3.50 2♠ W 3 ♣2 1-Weiss-Hampton vs 1-Metosky-Claymon
|
5 |
♠KJ753
♥42
♦K5
♣QJT5
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
♠T2
♥T9873
♦642
♣862
|
♠A98
♥KQ6
♦A93
♣AK94
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 2♠ 2NT ♣6 ♥6 |
EW: 1♣ 1♥ ♦5 ♠4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
250 4.00 0.00 3N E -5 ♠4 2-Crane-Bergera vs 2-Metosky-Minsker
200 3.00 1.00 3N E -4 ♦Q 1-Weiss-Hampton vs 6-Machada-Lucier
150 1.50 2.50 2N E -3 ♦Q 4-Urben-Comstock vs 5-Rice-Hackstock
150 1.50 2.50 2N E -3 ♦8 6-Camins-Cree vs 4-Knode-Schaffner
100 0.00 4.00 3♥ E -2 ♦Q 5-Crawford-McMahan vs 1-Metosky-Claymon
|
6 |
♠K8765
♥T73
♦T
♣J952
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
♠AQT3
♥AQJ65
♦Q4
♣A6
|
♠J
♥9842
♦987653
♣Q7
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ ♦3 ♥2 ♠6 NT4 |
EW: 4/3♦ 4♥ 3/1NT ♣5 ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 4.00 0.00 3♣ S 3 ♥A 1-Weiss-Hampton vs 6-Machada-Lucier
50 2.50 1.50 3♠ N -1 ♥9 2-Crane-Bergera vs 2-Metosky-Minsker
50 2.50 1.50 3♣ S -1 ♦Q 5-Crawford-McMahan vs 1-Metosky-Claymon
140 1.00 3.00 1♥ W 3 ♦T 4-Urben-Comstock vs 5-Rice-Hackstock
620 0.00 4.00 4♥ E 4 ♦A 6-Camins-Cree vs 4-Knode-Schaffner
|
7 |
♠5
♥Q9
♦KT6
♣AKJT985
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
♠QJT
♥JT63
♦932
♣Q72
|
♠93
♥AK874
♦AQJ74
♣6
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 3/2♠ ♦4 ♥3/2 NT3 |
EW: 3♦ 4♥ ♣3 ♠3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
620 4.00 0.00 4♠ S 4 ♥3 1-Weiss-Hampton vs 6-Machada-Lucier
130 3.00 1.00 4♣ N 4 ♥A 6-Camins-Cree vs 4-Knode-Schaffner
200 1.00 3.00 4♠ S -2 ♥J 2-Crane-Bergera vs 2-Metosky-Minsker
200 1.00 3.00 4♠ S -2 ♥J 4-Urben-Comstock vs 5-Rice-Hackstock
200 1.00 3.00 4♠ S -2 ♦3 5-Crawford-McMahan vs 1-Metosky-Claymon
|
8 |
♠T85
♥6
♦QJ753
♣AKT2
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
♠AJ
♥J975
♦KT864
♣95
|
♠Q9732
♥QT4
♦A9
♣QJ8
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2/3♣ ♦6 ♥6 ♠5/6 NT6 |
EW: 1♦ 1♠ 1NT ♣4 ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 4.00 0.00 2♠ E -1 ♥A 5-Crawford-McMahan vs 1-Metosky-Claymon
100 2.50 1.50 2♦ N -2 ♣Q 1-Weiss-Hampton vs 6-Machada-Lucier
100 2.50 1.50 3♣ N -2 ♠9 2-Crane-Bergera vs 2-Metosky-Minsker
150 0.50 3.50 2♥ S -3 ♠A 6-Camins-Cree vs 4-Knode-Schaffner
150 0.50 3.50 3♦ N -3 ♣Q 4-Urben-Comstock vs 5-Rice-Hackstock
|
9 |
♠KQT9
♥JT96
♦Q8
♣Q62
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
♠A
♥K2
♦J7643
♣T9853
|
♠J742
♥AQ8
♦A2
♣AKJ7
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣1 ♦3 ♥5 ♠5 NT3 |
EW: 6♣ 4♦ 2♥ 2♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 4.00 0.00 3♣ E 3 ♠3 3-Berton, Jr-Farnham vs 3-Klein-Curwin
150 3.00 1.00 2N E 3 ♦6 5-Crawford-McMahan vs 6-Machada-Lucier
180 2.00 2.00 2N E 4 ♦9 6-Camins-Cree vs 2-Metosky-Minsker
630 0.50 3.50 3N E 4 ♠3 2-Crane-Bergera vs 1-Metosky-Claymon
630 0.50 3.50 3N E 4 ♥7 1-Weiss-Hampton vs 5-Rice-Hackstock
|
10 |
♠75
♥84
♦K62
♣AQ9853
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
♠K9
♥9532
♦AJ974
♣JT
|
♠Q86432
♥A7
♦83
♣K76
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 1♥ 2NT ♦6 ♠5 |
EW: 1♦ 1♠ ♣4 ♥4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 4.00 0.00 2♠ E -2 ♥K 3-Berton, Jr-Farnham vs 3-Klein-Curwin
150 3.00 1.00 2N S 3 ♦7 2-Crane-Bergera vs 1-Metosky-Claymon
100 2.00 2.00 3♠ E -1 ♥K 5-Crawford-McMahan vs 6-Machada-Lucier
200 0.50 3.50 3N N -2 ♠4 1-Weiss-Hampton vs 5-Rice-Hackstock
200 0.50 3.50 3♥ S -2 ♣J 6-Camins-Cree vs 2-Metosky-Minsker
|
11 |
♠82
♥AJ5
♦KQ52
♣AQ87
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
♠A74
♥73
♦A976
♣KT96
|
♠KJT965
♥QT2
♦T8
♣42
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♦ 2♥ ♠5 NT6 |
EW: 2♠ 1NT ♣6 ♦6 ♥5/4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 4.00 0.00 2♥ N 3 ♦T 5-Crawford-McMahan vs 6-Machada-Lucier
50 2.50 1.50 4♥ N -1 ♠K 1-Weiss-Hampton vs 5-Rice-Hackstock
50 2.50 1.50 2♦ N -1 ♠J 2-Crane-Bergera vs 1-Metosky-Claymon
100 1.00 3.00 2N S -2 ♠A 3-Berton, Jr-Farnham vs 3-Klein-Curwin
200 0.00 4.00 3N N -4 ♠J 6-Camins-Cree vs 2-Metosky-Minsker
|
12 |
♠43
♥KT43
♦953
♣T832
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
♠A872
♥2
♦AQJ762
♣54
|
♠KQJT65
♥Q75
♦4
♣AJ6
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 2♥ ♦2 ♠1 NT3 |
EW: 4♦ 6♠ 2NT ♣5 ♥5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.00 0.00 4♠* W -1 ♥4 1-Weiss-Hampton vs 5-Rice-Hackstock
200 2.50 1.50 3♠ E 5 ♥8 3-Berton, Jr-Farnham vs 3-Klein-Curwin
200 2.50 1.50 2♠ E 5 ♣K 2-Crane-Bergera vs 1-Metosky-Claymon
450 1.00 3.00 4♠ E 5 ♣K 5-Crawford-McMahan vs 6-Machada-Lucier
1100 0.00 4.00 5♥* N -4 ♠K 6-Camins-Cree vs 2-Metosky-Minsker
|
13 |
♠J843
♥A873
♦Q7
♣QJ5
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
♠652
♥QJ2
♦K65
♣A862
|
♠A9
♥64
♦AJT843
♣T74
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♥ 2♠ ♣5 ♦4 NT5 |
EW: 2♣ 2♦ 2NT ♥5 ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 3.50 0.50 1♠ N 2 ♥3 2-Crane-Bergera vs 6-Machada-Lucier
110 3.50 0.50 2♥ N 2 ♦A 4-Urben-Comstock vs 4-Knode-Schaffner
90 1.50 2.50 2♦ E 2 ♠K 3-Berton, Jr-Farnham vs 2-Metosky-Minsker
90 1.50 2.50 2♦ E 2 ♠7 1-Weiss-Hampton vs 3-Klein-Curwin
100 0.00 4.00 2♥ N -1 ♠A 6-Camins-Cree vs 1-Metosky-Claymon
|
14 |
♠7
♥954
♦Q53
♣KQT832
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
♠K83
♥AJ863
♦AJT
♣J6
|
♠QJ64
♥QT7
♦987
♣954
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2/3♣ 2/3♦ -/1♠ 1NT ♥4/6 ♠6/7 |
EW: ♣4 ♦4 ♥6 ♠6 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.00 0.00 3♥ W -2 ♠7 6-Camins-Cree vs 1-Metosky-Claymon
50 3.00 1.00 2♥ W -1 ♠7 1-Weiss-Hampton vs 3-Klein-Curwin
50 2.00 2.00 3N N -1 ♥8 3-Berton, Jr-Farnham vs 2-Metosky-Minsker
100 1.00 3.00 4♠ S -2 ♥A 2-Crane-Bergera vs 6-Machada-Lucier
110 0.00 4.00 2♥ W 2 ♠7 4-Urben-Comstock vs 4-Knode-Schaffner
|
15 |
♠K42
♥Q8
♦A9842
♣JT9
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
♠865
♥J3
♦QT6
♣87532
|
♠AQT
♥KT92
♦K53
♣KQ6
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 1♥ 1♠ ♣5 NT6 |
EW: 2♣ 1NT ♦6 ♥6 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 3.50 0.50 1N E -1 ♥7 1-Weiss-Hampton vs 3-Klein-Curwin
50 3.50 0.50 1N E -1 ♥5 3-Berton, Jr-Farnham vs 2-Metosky-Minsker
90 2.00 2.00 1N E 1 ♥5 6-Camins-Cree vs 1-Metosky-Claymon
100 1.00 3.00 2♥ S -1 ♣2 2-Crane-Bergera vs 6-Machada-Lucier
120 0.00 4.00 1N E 2 ♥5 4-Urben-Comstock vs 4-Knode-Schaffner
|
16 |
♠AT85
♥T96
♦A9872
♣K
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
♠J6
♥QJ3
♦KJT
♣T9742
|
♠K42
♥A874
♦643
♣AQ6
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 2♠ ♣4 ♥5 NT5 |
EW: 2♣ 2♥ 2NT ♦6 ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.50 0.50 2♥ E -1 ♦Q 1-Weiss-Hampton vs 3-Klein-Curwin
100 3.50 0.50 2♣ E -1 ♠3 2-Crane-Bergera vs 6-Machada-Lucier
110 2.00 2.00 1♣ E 3 ♦5 6-Camins-Cree vs 1-Metosky-Claymon
120 0.50 3.50 1N W 2 ♦7 3-Berton, Jr-Farnham vs 2-Metosky-Minsker
120 0.50 3.50 1N E 2 ♦7 4-Urben-Comstock vs 4-Knode-Schaffner
|
17 |
♠K98
♥A7
♦A85
♣Q9852
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
♠Q654
♥64
♦J932
♣KT4
|
♠JT3
♥QJ9852
♦Q7
♣J7
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 4♦ 2/1♥ 3♠ 4NT |
EW: ♣2 ♦3 ♥5 ♠4 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
490 4.00 0.00 3N N 6 ♥Q 3-Berton, Jr-Farnham vs 1-Metosky-Claymon
460 3.00 1.00 3N S 5 ♥6 1-Weiss-Hampton vs 2-Metosky-Minsker
430 1.00 3.00 3N S 4 ♠4 5-Crawford-McMahan vs 5-Rice-Hackstock
430 1.00 3.00 3N S 4 ♥6 2-Crane-Bergera vs 4-Knode-Schaffner
430 1.00 3.00 3N S 4 ♥4 4-Urben-Comstock vs 3-Klein-Curwin
|
18 |
♠AJ3
♥T6
♦97
♣Q87642
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
♠QT94
♥8
♦AT832
♣AKT
|
♠7652
♥QJ954
♦KQ
♣93
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ ♦5 ♥6 ♠4 NT6 |
EW: 2♦ 1♥ 2♠ ♣5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
180 4.00 0.00 1N N 4 ♠2 1-Weiss-Hampton vs 2-Metosky-Minsker
150 2.50 1.50 1N N 3 ♠5 2-Crane-Bergera vs 4-Knode-Schaffner
150 2.50 1.50 3♦ E -3 ♥6 4-Urben-Comstock vs 3-Klein-Curwin
110 1.00 3.00 2♦ W 3 ♥6 5-Crawford-McMahan vs 5-Rice-Hackstock
300 0.00 4.00 2♥ S -3 ♣A 3-Berton, Jr-Farnham vs 1-Metosky-Claymon
|
19 |
♠875
♥KT8
♦AK8
♣T763
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
♠KJT6
♥AQ5
♦T7543
♣5
|
♠42
♥76432
♦Q9
♣KJ82
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 2/3♦ 2♥ 3♠ 4NT |
EW: ♣3/2 ♦4 ♥4/5 ♠4 NT3/2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 4.00 0.00 2N N 3 ♣2 5-Crawford-McMahan vs 5-Rice-Hackstock
110 3.00 1.00 2♠ N 2 ♦Q 2-Crane-Bergera vs 4-Knode-Schaffner
90 2.00 2.00 1N N 1 ♥7 4-Urben-Comstock vs 3-Klein-Curwin
50 0.50 3.50 3N N -1 ♥3 1-Weiss-Hampton vs 2-Metosky-Minsker
50 0.50 3.50 2N N -1 ♥3 3-Berton, Jr-Farnham vs 1-Metosky-Claymon
|
20 |
♠T4
♥AJ7653
♦K7
♣AQT
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
♠K65
♥842
♦AJ3
♣9863
|
♠AQJ87
♥QT9
♦T6
♣KJ4
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 1♥ ♣5/3 ♠4 NT4 |
EW: 2♣ 2♠ 2NT ♦5 ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.00 0.00 3♠ E -1 ♥K 5-Crawford-McMahan vs 5-Rice-Hackstock
100 2.50 1.50 3♥ N -1 ♠A 2-Crane-Bergera vs 4-Knode-Schaffner
100 2.50 1.50 3♥ N -1 ♠A 4-Urben-Comstock vs 3-Klein-Curwin
140 0.50 3.50 3♠ E 3 ♥K 3-Berton, Jr-Farnham vs 1-Metosky-Claymon
140 0.50 3.50 2♠ E 3 ♥K 1-Weiss-Hampton vs 2-Metosky-Minsker
|
21 |
♠Q96
♥874
♦A765
♣Q83
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
♠432
♥AJ93
♦82
♣AT52
|
♠875
♥2
♦KQJ43
♣J974
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♥ 2♠ 1NT ♣5 ♦6 |
EW: 2♣ 1♦ ♥5 ♠5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.00 1.00 3N N -1 ♦J 3-Berton, Jr-Farnham vs 5-Rice-Hackstock
100 3.00 1.00 3♥ S -1 ♦8 5-Crawford-McMahan vs 4-Knode-Schaffner
100 3.00 1.00 3♥ N -1 ♦K 4-Urben-Comstock vs 2-Metosky-Minsker
200 1.00 3.00 4♥ S -2 ♦8 2-Crane-Bergera vs 3-Klein-Curwin
500 0.00 4.00 4♥* N -2 ♣A 6-Camins-Cree vs 6-Machada-Lucier
|
22 |
♠5
♥T7432
♦A765
♣A53
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
♠AK83
♥KJ6
♦Q43
♣J62
|
♠QT62
♥Q98
♦K82
♣Q84
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 1♦ 2♥ ♠6 NT6 |
EW: 1♠ 1NT ♣5 ♦5 ♥5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.00 0.00 2♠ E -1 ♥A 4-Urben-Comstock vs 2-Metosky-Minsker
110 1.50 2.50 2♠ E 2 ♥A 3-Berton, Jr-Farnham vs 5-Rice-Hackstock
110 1.50 2.50 2♠ E 2 ♦J 2-Crane-Bergera vs 3-Klein-Curwin
110 1.50 2.50 2♠ E 2 ♦J 5-Crawford-McMahan vs 4-Knode-Schaffner
110 1.50 2.50 2♠ E 2 ♦5 6-Camins-Cree vs 6-Machada-Lucier
|
23 |
♠4
♥AKJ3
♦KQJT5
♣743
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
♠AT
♥T85
♦A986
♣AKJ2
|
♠KJ87
♥Q764
♦-
♣QT965
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ ♣2 ♥4 ♠6 NT4 |
EW: 4♣ 2♥ 3NT ♦5 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.00 0.00 3N W -1 ♦K 3-Berton, Jr-Farnham vs 5-Rice-Hackstock
110 3.00 1.00 2♠ E 2 ♣8 6-Camins-Cree vs 6-Machada-Lucier
120 1.50 2.50 2N W 2 ♦K 2-Crane-Bergera vs 3-Klein-Curwin
120 1.50 2.50 2N W 2 ♦T 5-Crawford-McMahan vs 4-Knode-Schaffner
130 0.00 4.00 3♣ E 4 ♠2 4-Urben-Comstock vs 2-Metosky-Minsker
|
24 |
♠KQ86
♥T86
♦9754
♣53
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
♠J932
♥K743
♦A
♣QJT7
|
♠A754
♥QJ
♦K83
♣AK82
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦6 ♥4 ♠3 NT4 |
EW: 4♣ 1♦ 3♥ 4♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 3.50 0.50 4♠ E -1 ♦Q 2-Crane-Bergera vs 3-Klein-Curwin
50 3.50 0.50 4♠ E -1 ♦Q 5-Crawford-McMahan vs 4-Knode-Schaffner
420 1.50 2.50 4♠ E 4 ♦Q 3-Berton, Jr-Farnham vs 5-Rice-Hackstock
420 1.50 2.50 4♠ E 4 ♣4 4-Urben-Comstock vs 2-Metosky-Minsker
430 0.00 4.00 3N E 4 ♦6 6-Camins-Cree vs 6-Machada-Lucier
|