1 |
♠-
♥-
♦-
♣-
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 5.00 0.00 4♠ E -2 ♥A 3-Stoll-Gallin vs 4-Likerman-Lindsay
110 4.00 1.00 3♣ W 3 ♦4 1-Burchfield-Burchfield vs 1-Kalman-Sullivan
170 3.00 2.00 2♥ E 4 ♠T 4-Rahn-Rahn vs 6-Barnhill-Barnhill
200 2.00 3.00 2♥ W 5 ♦4 2-Lennox-Lennox vs 2-Bond-Bond
420 1.00 4.00 4♥ W 4 ♦4 6-Gutkin-Katz vs 5-Zimmerman-Dugger
450 0.00 5.00 4♥ E 5 ♠T 5-Braunstein-Campbell vs 3-Galloway-Morse
|
2 |
♠-
♥-
♦-
♣-
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 5.00 0.00 3♠ N 4 ♣7 3-Stoll-Gallin vs 4-Likerman-Lindsay
150 4.00 1.00 3♣ N 5 ♥7 4-Rahn-Rahn vs 6-Barnhill-Barnhill
140 2.50 2.50 3♠ N 3 ♣7 1-Burchfield-Burchfield vs 1-Kalman-Sullivan
140 2.50 2.50 2♠ N 3 ♥7 2-Lennox-Lennox vs 2-Bond-Bond
100 0.50 4.50 3N S -1 ♥2 5-Braunstein-Campbell vs 3-Galloway-Morse
100 0.50 4.50 4♠ N -1 ♥4 6-Gutkin-Katz vs 5-Zimmerman-Dugger
|
3 |
♠-
♥-
♦-
♣-
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
460 4.50 0.50 3N S 5 ♠4 1-Burchfield-Burchfield vs 1-Kalman-Sullivan
460 4.50 0.50 3N S 5 ♠2 4-Rahn-Rahn vs 6-Barnhill-Barnhill
430 3.00 2.00 3N S 4 ♠2 6-Gutkin-Katz vs 5-Zimmerman-Dugger
130 1.00 4.00 3♦ S 4 ♠4 2-Lennox-Lennox vs 2-Bond-Bond
130 1.00 4.00 2♦ S 4 ♠Q 5-Braunstein-Campbell vs 3-Galloway-Morse
130 1.00 4.00 2♦ S 4 ♠9 3-Stoll-Gallin vs 4-Likerman-Lindsay
|
4 |
♠-
♥-
♦-
♣-
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
650 5.00 0.00 4♥ N 5 ♦A 3-Stoll-Gallin vs 4-Likerman-Lindsay
620 3.50 1.50 4♥ N 4 ♦A 2-Lennox-Lennox vs 2-Bond-Bond
620 3.50 1.50 4♥ N 4 ♣8 1-Burchfield-Burchfield vs 1-Kalman-Sullivan
110 2.00 3.00 2♥ S 2 ♦4 5-Braunstein-Campbell vs 3-Galloway-Morse
100 1.00 4.00 4♥ N -1 ♣8 6-Gutkin-Katz vs 5-Zimmerman-Dugger
200 0.00 5.00 5♥ N -2 ♦5 4-Rahn-Rahn vs 6-Barnhill-Barnhill
|
5 |
♠-
♥-
♦-
♣-
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 4.00 1.00 2♥ E 2 ♠J 6-Gutkin-Katz vs 4-Likerman-Lindsay
110 4.00 1.00 2♥ E 2 ♠T 2-Lennox-Lennox vs 1-Kalman-Sullivan
110 4.00 1.00 3♣ W 3 ♥J 5-Braunstein-Campbell vs 2-Bond-Bond
400 1.00 4.00 3N W 3 ♠5 3-Stoll-Gallin vs 3-Galloway-Morse
400 1.00 4.00 3N E 3 ♠T 4-Rahn-Rahn vs 5-Zimmerman-Dugger
400 1.00 4.00 3N E 3 ♣2 1-Burchfield-Burchfield vs 6-Barnhill-Barnhill
|
6 |
♠-
♥-
♦-
♣-
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.50 0.50 4♠ W -1 ♦4 3-Stoll-Gallin vs 3-Galloway-Morse
100 4.50 0.50 4♠ W -1 ♦4 4-Rahn-Rahn vs 5-Zimmerman-Dugger
50 3.00 2.00 4♦ S -1 ♠A 1-Burchfield-Burchfield vs 6-Barnhill-Barnhill
300 2.00 3.00 5♦* S -2 ♠A 2-Lennox-Lennox vs 1-Kalman-Sullivan
620 0.50 4.50 4♠ W 4 ♦K 6-Gutkin-Katz vs 4-Likerman-Lindsay
620 0.50 4.50 4♠ W 4 ♣7 5-Braunstein-Campbell vs 2-Bond-Bond
|
7 |
♠-
♥-
♦-
♣-
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
300 5.00 0.00 2N W -3 ♥6 5-Braunstein-Campbell vs 2-Bond-Bond
140 2.50 2.50 3♥ N 3 ♠T 3-Stoll-Gallin vs 3-Galloway-Morse
140 2.50 2.50 3♥ N 3 ♦A 4-Rahn-Rahn vs 5-Zimmerman-Dugger
140 2.50 2.50 3♥ N 3 ♣3 6-Gutkin-Katz vs 4-Likerman-Lindsay
140 2.50 2.50 2♥ N 3 ♣3 1-Burchfield-Burchfield vs 6-Barnhill-Barnhill
100 0.00 5.00 1N W -1 ♥6 2-Lennox-Lennox vs 1-Kalman-Sullivan
|
8 |
♠-
♥-
♦-
♣-
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 5.00 0.00 2♥ W 2 ♣4 2-Lennox-Lennox vs 1-Kalman-Sullivan
120 4.00 1.00 2N W 2 ♣4 5-Braunstein-Campbell vs 2-Bond-Bond
400 1.50 3.50 3N W 3 ♠3 4-Rahn-Rahn vs 5-Zimmerman-Dugger
400 1.50 3.50 3N W 3 ♥3 6-Gutkin-Katz vs 4-Likerman-Lindsay
400 1.50 3.50 3N W 3 ♣4 1-Burchfield-Burchfield vs 6-Barnhill-Barnhill
400 1.50 3.50 3N E 3 ♣7 3-Stoll-Gallin vs 3-Galloway-Morse
|
9 |
♠-
♥-
♦-
♣-
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
520 5.00 0.00 3N N 7 ♠5 4-Rahn-Rahn vs 4-Likerman-Lindsay
490 4.00 1.00 3N N 6 ♣T 6-Gutkin-Katz vs 3-Galloway-Morse
400 2.50 2.50 3N N 3 ♠5 2-Lennox-Lennox vs 6-Barnhill-Barnhill
400 2.50 2.50 3N N 3 ♠5 3-Stoll-Gallin vs 2-Bond-Bond
50 1.00 4.00 2N N -1 ♠5 5-Braunstein-Campbell vs 1-Kalman-Sullivan
100 0.00 5.00 3N N -2 ♠5 1-Burchfield-Burchfield vs 5-Zimmerman-Dugger
|
10 |
♠-
♥-
♦-
♣-
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 5.00 0.00 4♠ E -1 ♦A 3-Stoll-Gallin vs 2-Bond-Bond
620 3.50 1.50 4♠ E 4 ♥Q 4-Rahn-Rahn vs 4-Likerman-Lindsay
620 3.50 1.50 4♠ E 4 ♥J 5-Braunstein-Campbell vs 1-Kalman-Sullivan
650 1.50 3.50 4♠ E 5 ♥Q 2-Lennox-Lennox vs 6-Barnhill-Barnhill
650 1.50 3.50 4♠ E 5 ♦A 1-Burchfield-Burchfield vs 5-Zimmerman-Dugger
680 0.00 5.00 4♥ E 6 ♠3 6-Gutkin-Katz vs 3-Galloway-Morse
|
11 |
♠-
♥-
♦-
♣-
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 4.00 1.00 1N W -1 ♦2 1-Burchfield-Burchfield vs 5-Zimmerman-Dugger
50 4.00 1.00 1N W -1 ♦2 2-Lennox-Lennox vs 6-Barnhill-Barnhill
50 4.00 1.00 2♦ W -1 ♥K 6-Gutkin-Katz vs 3-Galloway-Morse
90 2.00 3.00 1N W 1 ♥A 5-Braunstein-Campbell vs 1-Kalman-Sullivan
120 0.50 4.50 1N W 2 ♥A 4-Rahn-Rahn vs 4-Likerman-Lindsay
120 0.50 4.50 1N W 2 ♦5 3-Stoll-Gallin vs 2-Bond-Bond
|
12 |
♠-
♥-
♦-
♣-
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 5.00 0.00 1♥ S 4 ♠2 1-Burchfield-Burchfield vs 5-Zimmerman-Dugger
140 3.50 1.50 1♥ S 3 ♣6 6-Gutkin-Katz vs 3-Galloway-Morse
140 3.50 1.50 1♥ S 3 ♣3 5-Braunstein-Campbell vs 1-Kalman-Sullivan
120 2.00 3.00 1N S 2 ♠2 4-Rahn-Rahn vs 4-Likerman-Lindsay
110 1.00 4.00 1♥ S 2 ♣6 2-Lennox-Lennox vs 6-Barnhill-Barnhill
100 0.00 5.00 4♥ S -1 ♦A 3-Stoll-Gallin vs 2-Bond-Bond
|
13 |
♠-
♥-
♦-
♣-
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 5.00 0.00 2♥ S 2 ♣4 2-Lennox-Lennox vs 5-Zimmerman-Dugger
90 3.50 1.50 1N S 1 ♠4 3-Stoll-Gallin vs 1-Kalman-Sullivan
90 3.50 1.50 2♦ N 2 ♥9 4-Rahn-Rahn vs 3-Galloway-Morse
100 1.00 4.00 3♥ S -1 ♠A 5-Braunstein-Campbell vs 6-Barnhill-Barnhill
100 1.00 4.00 2♥ S -1 ♣4 6-Gutkin-Katz vs 2-Bond-Bond
100 1.00 4.00 2♦ N -1 ♣2 1-Burchfield-Burchfield vs 4-Likerman-Lindsay
|
14 |
♠-
♥-
♦-
♣-
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
260 5.00 0.00 3♠ E 7 ♣J 5-Braunstein-Campbell vs 6-Barnhill-Barnhill
480 4.00 1.00 4♠ E 6 ♦2 6-Gutkin-Katz vs 2-Bond-Bond
510 1.50 3.50 4♠ E 7 ♥6 1-Burchfield-Burchfield vs 4-Likerman-Lindsay
510 1.50 3.50 4♠ E 7 ♥6 2-Lennox-Lennox vs 5-Zimmerman-Dugger
510 1.50 3.50 4♠ E 7 ♣K 4-Rahn-Rahn vs 3-Galloway-Morse
510 1.50 3.50 4♥ W 7 ♣6 3-Stoll-Gallin vs 1-Kalman-Sullivan
|
15 |
♠-
♥-
♦-
♣-
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
300 5.00 0.00 5♥ S -3 ♠A 2-Lennox-Lennox vs 5-Zimmerman-Dugger
420 4.00 1.00 4♠ W 4 ♥A 3-Stoll-Gallin vs 1-Kalman-Sullivan
450 1.50 3.50 5♠ W 5 ♥A 1-Burchfield-Burchfield vs 4-Likerman-Lindsay
450 1.50 3.50 4♠ W 5 ♥A 4-Rahn-Rahn vs 3-Galloway-Morse
450 1.50 3.50 4♠ W 5 ♣3 5-Braunstein-Campbell vs 6-Barnhill-Barnhill
450 1.50 3.50 4♠ W 5 ♣2 6-Gutkin-Katz vs 2-Bond-Bond
|
16 |
♠-
♥-
♦-
♣-
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
400 5.00 0.00 2N W -4 ♦4 1-Burchfield-Burchfield vs 4-Likerman-Lindsay
110 3.50 1.50 1♥ N 2 ♦T 2-Lennox-Lennox vs 5-Zimmerman-Dugger
110 3.50 1.50 2♦ S 3 ♣8 5-Braunstein-Campbell vs 6-Barnhill-Barnhill
100 1.50 3.50 2♣ E -1 ♠J 4-Rahn-Rahn vs 3-Galloway-Morse
100 1.50 3.50 2♣ E -1 ♠2 6-Gutkin-Katz vs 2-Bond-Bond
90 0.00 5.00 1N E 1 ♠J 3-Stoll-Gallin vs 1-Kalman-Sullivan
|
17 |
♠-
♥-
♦-
♣-
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 5.00 0.00 2♥ S 2 ♠A 4-Rahn-Rahn vs 2-Bond-Bond
100 4.00 1.00 3♦ W -2 ♥9 5-Braunstein-Campbell vs 5-Zimmerman-Dugger
90 3.00 2.00 2♣ S 2 ♠A 2-Lennox-Lennox vs 4-Likerman-Lindsay
50 2.00 3.00 2♣ S -1 ♦4 6-Gutkin-Katz vs 1-Kalman-Sullivan
100 1.00 4.00 2♥ S -2 ♠A 1-Burchfield-Burchfield vs 3-Galloway-Morse
150 0.00 5.00 4♥ S -3 ♠A 3-Stoll-Gallin vs 6-Barnhill-Barnhill
|
18 |
♠-
♥-
♦-
♣-
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
620 5.00 0.00 4♠ N 4 ♦6 4-Rahn-Rahn vs 2-Bond-Bond
170 4.00 1.00 2♠ N 4 ♥K 3-Stoll-Gallin vs 6-Barnhill-Barnhill
140 2.00 3.00 3♠ N 3 ♥K 2-Lennox-Lennox vs 4-Likerman-Lindsay
140 2.00 3.00 2♠ N 3 ♥K 6-Gutkin-Katz vs 1-Kalman-Sullivan
140 2.00 3.00 2♠ N 3 ♣4 1-Burchfield-Burchfield vs 3-Galloway-Morse
100 0.00 5.00 3♠ N -1 ♣4 5-Braunstein-Campbell vs 5-Zimmerman-Dugger
|
19 |
♠-
♥-
♦-
♣-
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 5.00 0.00 4♠ E -2 ♦A 5-Braunstein-Campbell vs 5-Zimmerman-Dugger
110 4.00 1.00 2♥ W 2 ♦9 6-Gutkin-Katz vs 1-Kalman-Sullivan
140 3.00 2.00 3♠ E 3 ♦A 2-Lennox-Lennox vs 4-Likerman-Lindsay
200 2.00 3.00 3♥ W 5 ♦9 4-Rahn-Rahn vs 2-Bond-Bond
620 1.00 4.00 4♥ W 4 ♦6 3-Stoll-Gallin vs 6-Barnhill-Barnhill
650 0.00 5.00 4♥ W 5 ♣7 1-Burchfield-Burchfield vs 3-Galloway-Morse
|
20 |
♠-
♥-
♦-
♣-
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
660 5.00 0.00 3N S 5 ♥6 6-Gutkin-Katz vs 1-Kalman-Sullivan
630 4.00 1.00 3N S 4 ♦5 1-Burchfield-Burchfield vs 3-Galloway-Morse
620 3.00 2.00 4♥ S 4 ♦K 4-Rahn-Rahn vs 2-Bond-Bond
600 1.50 3.50 3N S 3 ♦K 2-Lennox-Lennox vs 4-Likerman-Lindsay
600 1.50 3.50 3N S 3 ♦K 3-Stoll-Gallin vs 6-Barnhill-Barnhill
180 0.00 5.00 2N S 4 ♦K 5-Braunstein-Campbell vs 5-Zimmerman-Dugger
|
21 |
♠-
♥-
♦-
♣-
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
630 3.50 1.50 3N S 4 ♥4 1-Burchfield-Burchfield vs 2-Bond-Bond
630 3.50 1.50 3N N 4 ♥T 5-Braunstein-Campbell vs 4-Likerman-Lindsay
630 3.50 1.50 3N N 4 ♣2 3-Stoll-Gallin vs 5-Zimmerman-Dugger
630 3.50 1.50 3N N 4 ♣2 4-Rahn-Rahn vs 1-Kalman-Sullivan
600 0.50 4.50 3N N 3 ♣T 2-Lennox-Lennox vs 3-Galloway-Morse
600 0.50 4.50 3N N 3 ♣T 6-Gutkin-Katz vs 6-Barnhill-Barnhill
|
22 |
♠-
♥-
♦-
♣-
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
190 5.00 0.00 2♣ N 7 ♦6 1-Burchfield-Burchfield vs 2-Bond-Bond
170 4.00 1.00 3♣ N 6 ♦3 6-Gutkin-Katz vs 6-Barnhill-Barnhill
110 2.00 3.00 3♦ N 3 ♣7 2-Lennox-Lennox vs 3-Galloway-Morse
110 2.00 3.00 2♦ N 3 ♣7 5-Braunstein-Campbell vs 4-Likerman-Lindsay
110 2.00 3.00 1♦ N 3 ♠4 3-Stoll-Gallin vs 5-Zimmerman-Dugger
100 0.00 5.00 3N S -2 ♥5 4-Rahn-Rahn vs 1-Kalman-Sullivan
|
23 |
♠-
♥-
♦-
♣-
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
130 5.00 0.00 4♣ W 4 ♦5 4-Rahn-Rahn vs 1-Kalman-Sullivan
200 4.00 1.00 5♠ S -2 ♣K 3-Stoll-Gallin vs 5-Zimmerman-Dugger
600 3.00 2.00 5♣ W 5 ♠A 1-Burchfield-Burchfield vs 2-Bond-Bond
620 1.50 3.50 5♣ W 6 ♥3 5-Braunstein-Campbell vs 4-Likerman-Lindsay
620 1.50 3.50 5♣ E 6 ♥K 6-Gutkin-Katz vs 6-Barnhill-Barnhill
660 0.00 5.00 3N W 5 ♦Q 2-Lennox-Lennox vs 3-Galloway-Morse
|
24 |
♠-
♥-
♦-
♣-
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
300 5.00 0.00 5♣* W -2 ♦A 2-Lennox-Lennox vs 3-Galloway-Morse
100 3.50 1.50 5♣ W -2 ♦A 3-Stoll-Gallin vs 5-Zimmerman-Dugger
100 3.50 1.50 5♣ W -2 ♦A 5-Braunstein-Campbell vs 4-Likerman-Lindsay
110 1.00 4.00 3♣ W 3 ♠A 1-Burchfield-Burchfield vs 2-Bond-Bond
110 1.00 4.00 3♣ W 3 ♥4 6-Gutkin-Katz vs 6-Barnhill-Barnhill
110 1.00 4.00 3♣ W 3 ♦A 4-Rahn-Rahn vs 1-Kalman-Sullivan
|