1 |
♠A
♥9632
♦A52
♣KJ954
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 3/2♦ 3♥ 3♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦4 ♥3 ♠4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
430 3.50 0.50 3N S 4 ♦J 1-Munzinger-Parsons vs 1-Roth-Winsberg
430 3.50 0.50 3N N 4 ♠2 4-Mann-McMahan vs 2-Epner-Allison
120 2.00 2.00 2N S 2 ♦6 5-Likerman-Lindsay vs 4-Brooks-Strandberg
100 0.50 3.50 3N S -2 ♦6 3-Andrews-Weiner vs 5-Cummings-Jackson
100 0.50 3.50 2N N -2 ♠2 2-Bond-Chareton vs 3-Lilien-Prince
|
2 |
♠J83
♥AKQ96
♦QJ7
♣92
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1/2♣ 1/2♦ 3♥ 3♠ 2/3NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦5 ♥4 ♠4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
600 4.00 0.00 3N N 3 ♦3 3-Andrews-Weiner vs 5-Cummings-Jackson
150 3.00 1.00 2N S 3 ♠2 1-Munzinger-Parsons vs 1-Roth-Winsberg
200 1.00 3.00 4N N -2 ♣3 4-Mann-McMahan vs 2-Epner-Allison
200 1.00 3.00 3N N -2 ♦T 2-Bond-Chareton vs 3-Lilien-Prince
200 1.00 3.00 4♥ N -2 ♦3 5-Likerman-Lindsay vs 4-Brooks-Strandberg
|
3 |
♠J7
♥T643
♦QJ543
♣86
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 1NT ♣2/3 ♥6 ♠5 |
EW: 4♣ 2♠ ♦4 ♥6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
800 4.00 0.00 4♠* W -3 ♦Q 4-Mann-McMahan vs 2-Epner-Allison
400 3.00 1.00 3N S 3 ♠5 5-Likerman-Lindsay vs 4-Brooks-Strandberg
150 2.00 2.00 2N S 3 ♠5 3-Andrews-Weiner vs 5-Cummings-Jackson
120 1.00 3.00 2N S 2 ♠5 2-Bond-Chareton vs 3-Lilien-Prince
100 0.00 4.00 5♠ N -2 ♠2 1-Munzinger-Parsons vs 1-Roth-Winsberg
|
4 |
♠AQ875
♥QT63
♦9
♣A63
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♥ 3♠ ♣1 ♦2 NT3 |
EW: 6♣ 5♦ 2NT ♥4 ♠4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
130 4.00 0.00 4♣ W 4 ♦9 2-Bond-Chareton vs 3-Lilien-Prince
150 3.00 1.00 3♦ E 5 ♠J 1-Munzinger-Parsons vs 1-Roth-Winsberg
200 2.00 2.00 4♠ N -2 ♦A 4-Mann-McMahan vs 2-Epner-Allison
620 0.50 3.50 5♣ W 6 ♠A 3-Andrews-Weiner vs 5-Cummings-Jackson
620 0.50 3.50 5♣ W 6 ♦9 5-Likerman-Lindsay vs 4-Brooks-Strandberg
|
5 |
♠AT8764
♥5
♦KQ53
♣42
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 2♦ 3♠ ♥5 NT5 |
EW: 2♥ ♣4 ♦4 ♠4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 3.88 0.13 4♥ W -3 ♦K 5-Likerman-Lindsay vs 4-Brooks-Strandberg
100 2.63 1.38 4♥ W -2 ♠A 1-Munzinger-Parsons vs 1-Roth-Winsberg
140 1.38 2.63 3♥ W 3 ♠A 2-Bond-Chareton vs 3-Lilien-Prince
420 0.13 3.88 4♥ W 4 ♠A 3-Andrews-Weiner vs 5-Cummings-Jackson
|
6 |
♠95
♥QT4
♦743
♣AQJ53
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 2♦ ♥3 ♠3 NT6 |
EW: 4♥ 4♠ 1NT ♣4 ♦4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 3.50 0.50 5♣ N -1 ♥8 5-Likerman-Lindsay vs 3-Lilien-Prince
50 3.50 0.50 4♣ N -1 ♥5 1-Munzinger-Parsons vs 5-Cummings-Jackson
100 2.00 2.00 5♣ N -2 ♥A 4-Mann-McMahan vs 1-Roth-Winsberg
620 0.50 3.50 4♥ W 4 ♠9 3-Andrews-Weiner vs 4-Brooks-Strandberg
620 0.50 3.50 4♥ W 4 ♣A 2-Bond-Chareton vs 2-Epner-Allison
|
7 |
♠AJ95
♥AKT
♦KQ43
♣A4
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♦ 4/3♠ 3/2NT ♥6 |
EW: 1♥ ♣6 ♦6 ♠3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
620 4.00 0.00 4♠ N 4 ♣K 5-Likerman-Lindsay vs 3-Lilien-Prince
100 3.00 1.00 2♥ E -1 ♦8 1-Munzinger-Parsons vs 5-Cummings-Jackson
100 1.00 3.00 3N N -1 ♥3 3-Andrews-Weiner vs 4-Brooks-Strandberg
100 1.00 3.00 2N N -1 ♣7 2-Bond-Chareton vs 2-Epner-Allison
100 1.00 3.00 3♠ S -1 ♦A 4-Mann-McMahan vs 1-Roth-Winsberg
|
8 |
♠T8
♥A985
♦AQJ
♣AJ94
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 3♥ 2NT ♦6 ♠6 |
EW: -/1♦ 1♠ ♣5 ♦6/7 ♥4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.00 0.00 3♠ E -2 ♥2 5-Likerman-Lindsay vs 3-Lilien-Prince
50 2.00 2.00 2♠ E -1 ♥2 3-Andrews-Weiner vs 4-Brooks-Strandberg
50 2.00 2.00 2♠ E -1 ♥2 4-Mann-McMahan vs 1-Roth-Winsberg
50 2.00 2.00 2♦ W -1 ♣4 2-Bond-Chareton vs 2-Epner-Allison
110 0.00 4.00 2♠ E 2 ♣7 1-Munzinger-Parsons vs 5-Cummings-Jackson
|
9 |
♠KJ92
♥Q753
♦KQ6
♣T2
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣1 ♦5 ♥3/2 ♠3/1 NT1 |
EW: 5♣ 2♦ 4♥ 4♠ 5NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
630 3.50 0.50 3N W 4 ♥3 2-Bond-Chareton vs 2-Epner-Allison
630 3.50 0.50 3N E 4 ♦3 4-Mann-McMahan vs 1-Roth-Winsberg
660 1.00 3.00 3N W 5 ♠2 3-Andrews-Weiner vs 4-Brooks-Strandberg
660 1.00 3.00 3N E 5 ♦4 1-Munzinger-Parsons vs 5-Cummings-Jackson
660 1.00 3.00 3N E 5 ♦3 5-Likerman-Lindsay vs 3-Lilien-Prince
|
10 |
♠J
♥QJ952
♦KQ872
♣A6
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 4♦ 2♥ 3♠ 4NT |
EW: ♣6 ♦2 ♥5 ♠3 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
630 3.50 0.50 3N S 4 ♣J 4-Mann-McMahan vs 1-Roth-Winsberg
630 3.50 0.50 3N S 4 ♣J 5-Likerman-Lindsay vs 3-Lilien-Prince
620 2.00 2.00 4♠ S 4 ♣J 3-Andrews-Weiner vs 4-Brooks-Strandberg
600 0.50 3.50 3N N 3 ♥8 2-Bond-Chareton vs 2-Epner-Allison
600 0.50 3.50 3N N 3 ♣5 1-Munzinger-Parsons vs 5-Cummings-Jackson
|
11 |
♠Q9
♥T95
♦QT97
♣KJ65
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦5 ♥6 ♠4 NT6 |
EW: 4♣ 2♦ -/1♥ 3♠ 1NT ♥6/7 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.50 0.50 3N W -2 ♣5 5-Likerman-Lindsay vs 2-Epner-Allison
100 3.50 0.50 4♠ W -2 ♦T 3-Andrews-Weiner vs 3-Lilien-Prince
50 2.00 2.00 3N W -1 ♣5 2-Bond-Chareton vs 1-Roth-Winsberg
110 1.00 3.00 2♠ E 2 ♣7 1-Munzinger-Parsons vs 4-Brooks-Strandberg
150 0.00 4.00 2N W 3 ♦7 4-Mann-McMahan vs 5-Cummings-Jackson
|
12 |
♠AT97
♥QJ95
♦AKT2
♣J
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 1♦ 4♥ 4♠ 5NT |
EW: ♣2 ♦5 ♥3 ♠3 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
660 4.00 0.00 3N N 5 ♠K 2-Bond-Chareton vs 1-Roth-Winsberg
630 3.00 1.00 3N N 4 ♦3 5-Likerman-Lindsay vs 2-Epner-Allison
600 1.50 2.50 3N N 3 ♥3 4-Mann-McMahan vs 5-Cummings-Jackson
600 1.50 2.50 3N N 3 ♦4 1-Munzinger-Parsons vs 4-Brooks-Strandberg
110 0.00 4.00 3♣ S 3 ♥6 3-Andrews-Weiner vs 3-Lilien-Prince
|
13 |
♠AJ2
♥KJ62
♦T62
♣J52
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6 ♦3/2 ♥6 ♠1 NT4 |
EW: 1♣ 4♦ 1♥ 6/5♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 4.00 0.00 3♠ W 3 ♥6 1-Munzinger-Parsons vs 4-Brooks-Strandberg
170 3.00 1.00 3♠ W 4 ♥2 2-Bond-Chareton vs 1-Roth-Winsberg
200 2.00 2.00 2♠ W 5 ♥2 5-Likerman-Lindsay vs 2-Epner-Allison
620 1.00 3.00 4♠ W 4 ♦6 4-Mann-McMahan vs 5-Cummings-Jackson
650 0.00 4.00 4♠ W 5 ♥2 3-Andrews-Weiner vs 3-Lilien-Prince
|
14 |
♠J932
♥AK54
♦K73
♣74
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 1/-NT ♦4 ♥6 ♠5 NT7/6 |
EW: 2♦ 1♥ 1♠ ♣4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 4.00 0.00 2♥ N 2 ♠K 3-Andrews-Weiner vs 3-Lilien-Prince
50 3.00 1.00 3♠ E -1 ♣T 4-Mann-McMahan vs 5-Cummings-Jackson
50 2.00 2.00 3♣ S -1 ♠6 2-Bond-Chareton vs 1-Roth-Winsberg
150 0.50 3.50 2♥ N -3 ♣5 1-Munzinger-Parsons vs 4-Brooks-Strandberg
150 0.50 3.50 2♥ N -3 ♣5 5-Likerman-Lindsay vs 2-Epner-Allison
|
15 |
♠9876
♥K
♦A752
♣T863
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ ♦2 ♥2 ♠4 NT2 |
EW: 4♦ 5♥ 3♠ 2NT ♣5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 4.00 0.00 3♥ W 4 ♠9 5-Likerman-Lindsay vs 2-Epner-Allison
420 3.00 1.00 4♥ W 4 ♣3 2-Bond-Chareton vs 1-Roth-Winsberg
450 1.50 2.50 4♥ W 5 ♦A 4-Mann-McMahan vs 5-Cummings-Jackson
450 1.50 2.50 4♥ W 5 ♣3 3-Andrews-Weiner vs 3-Lilien-Prince
480 0.00 4.00 4♥ W 6 ♠6 1-Munzinger-Parsons vs 4-Brooks-Strandberg
|
16 |
♠K5
♥93
♦KT5432
♣AK9
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 2♦ 1♥ ♠2 NT5 |
EW: 5♠ 2NT ♣5 ♦5 ♥5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 4.00 0.00 5♦ N -1 ♣6 3-Andrews-Weiner vs 2-Epner-Allison
100 3.00 1.00 4♦ N -2 ♣6 5-Likerman-Lindsay vs 1-Roth-Winsberg
200 1.50 2.50 3N S -4 ♠J 2-Bond-Chareton vs 5-Cummings-Jackson
200 1.50 2.50 3♠ E 5 ♦Q 1-Munzinger-Parsons vs 3-Lilien-Prince
500 0.00 4.00 5♦* N -3 ♣6 4-Mann-McMahan vs 4-Brooks-Strandberg
|
17 |
♠J8752
♥QJ
♦6
♣AQT96
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 2♥ ♦2 ♠5 NT4 |
EW: 4♦ 2♠ ♣3 ♥4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 3.00 1.00 1N E -1 ♥A 5-Likerman-Lindsay vs 1-Roth-Winsberg
50 3.00 1.00 2♠ W -1 ♥Q 4-Mann-McMahan vs 4-Brooks-Strandberg
50 3.00 1.00 4♦ E -1 ♥A 1-Munzinger-Parsons vs 3-Lilien-Prince
50 0.50 3.50 4♥ S -1 ♦A 3-Andrews-Weiner vs 2-Epner-Allison
50 0.50 3.50 4♥ S -1 ♣J 2-Bond-Chareton vs 5-Cummings-Jackson
|
18 |
♠JT53
♥862
♦93
♣J963
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6 ♦4 ♥6 ♠5 NT4 |
EW: 1♣ 3♦ 2♠ 1NT ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.00 0.00 3♠ W -2 ♥2 1-Munzinger-Parsons vs 3-Lilien-Prince
90 3.00 1.00 2♦ E 2 ♠A 5-Likerman-Lindsay vs 1-Roth-Winsberg
110 1.50 2.50 2♠ W 2 ♥8 2-Bond-Chareton vs 5-Cummings-Jackson
110 1.50 2.50 2♦ E 3 ♥4 3-Andrews-Weiner vs 2-Epner-Allison
130 0.00 4.00 3♦ E 4 ♠A 4-Mann-McMahan vs 4-Brooks-Strandberg
|
19 |
♠K86
♥A87642
♦T96
♣9
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♥ ♣4 ♦1 ♠1 NT1 |
EW: 3♣ 5♦ 6♠ 1NT ♥5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 4.00 0.00 3♠ E 3 ♥K 4-Mann-McMahan vs 4-Brooks-Strandberg
200 3.00 1.00 2♠ E 5 ♥K 1-Munzinger-Parsons vs 3-Lilien-Prince
620 2.00 2.00 4♠ E 4 ♥K 3-Andrews-Weiner vs 2-Epner-Allison
650 1.00 3.00 4♠ E 5 ♥3 5-Likerman-Lindsay vs 1-Roth-Winsberg
680 0.00 4.00 4♠ E 6 ♥8 2-Bond-Chareton vs 5-Cummings-Jackson
|
20 |
♠T93
♥JT76
♦65
♣J765
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣0 ♦0 ♥5 ♠0 NT0 |
EW: 7♣ 7♦ 2♥ 7♠ 7NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
300 4.00 0.00 6N W -3 ♦2 1-Munzinger-Parsons vs 3-Lilien-Prince
710 3.00 1.00 4♠ E 7 ♥K 4-Mann-McMahan vs 4-Brooks-Strandberg
720 2.00 2.00 3N W 7 ♥6 5-Likerman-Lindsay vs 1-Roth-Winsberg
1440 1.00 3.00 6N W 6 ♥6 3-Andrews-Weiner vs 2-Epner-Allison
1460 0.00 4.00 6♠ E 7 ♥5 2-Bond-Chareton vs 5-Cummings-Jackson
|
21 |
♠6
♥AK753
♦QT63
♣A72
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♥ ♣3 ♦4 ♠5 NT6 |
EW: 4♣ 3♦ 2♠ 1NT ♥3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
620 4.00 0.00 4♥ N 4 ♠3 3-Andrews-Weiner vs 1-Roth-Winsberg
170 3.00 1.00 3♥ S 4 ♣3 4-Mann-McMahan vs 3-Lilien-Prince
140 1.50 2.50 3♥ N 3 ♦7 1-Munzinger-Parsons vs 2-Epner-Allison
140 1.50 2.50 3♥ N 3 ♣6 5-Likerman-Lindsay vs 5-Cummings-Jackson
100 0.00 4.00 4♥ N -1 ♣6 2-Bond-Chareton vs 4-Brooks-Strandberg
|
22 |
♠JT843
♥AJ
♦AK85
♣72
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 3♦ 1♥ 3/4♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦3 ♥6 ♠3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
400 4.00 0.00 3N N 3 ♥3 5-Likerman-Lindsay vs 5-Cummings-Jackson
130 3.00 1.00 2♦ N 4 ♥3 2-Bond-Chareton vs 4-Brooks-Strandberg
120 2.00 2.00 1N S 2 ♣4 1-Munzinger-Parsons vs 2-Epner-Allison
110 0.50 3.50 3♦ N 3 ♥9 4-Mann-McMahan vs 3-Lilien-Prince
110 0.50 3.50 3♦ N 3 ♥3 3-Andrews-Weiner vs 1-Roth-Winsberg
|
23 |
♠Q7
♥84
♦KQT85
♣KQ82
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦5 ♥0 ♠0 NT0 |
EW: 2♣ 1♦ 7♥ 7♠ 7NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
260 4.00 0.00 2♥ E 7 ♦J 4-Mann-McMahan vs 3-Lilien-Prince
650 2.00 2.00 4♥ E 5 ♠3 1-Munzinger-Parsons vs 2-Epner-Allison
650 2.00 2.00 4♥ E 5 ♦7 2-Bond-Chareton vs 4-Brooks-Strandberg
650 2.00 2.00 4♥ E 5 ♦2 3-Andrews-Weiner vs 1-Roth-Winsberg
710 0.00 4.00 4♥ E 7 ♦J 5-Likerman-Lindsay vs 5-Cummings-Jackson
|
24 |
♠AJ43
♥7
♦K73
♣AT965
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 2♦ 5♠ 1NT ♥3 |
EW: 4♥ ♣3 ♦5 ♠2 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
650 4.00 0.00 5♠* S 5 ♥K 3-Andrews-Weiner vs 1-Roth-Winsberg
420 3.00 1.00 4♠ S 4 ♣3 1-Munzinger-Parsons vs 2-Epner-Allison
100 1.50 2.50 5♥* E -1 ♠K 2-Bond-Chareton vs 4-Brooks-Strandberg
100 1.50 2.50 5♥* E -1 ♣Q 4-Mann-McMahan vs 3-Lilien-Prince
50 0.00 4.00 5♠ S -1 ♥4 5-Likerman-Lindsay vs 5-Cummings-Jackson
|
25 |
♠K82
♥AKQT
♦T953
♣AT
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♥ 3NT ♣4 ♦5 ♠5 |
EW: 3♣ 1♦ 2♠ ♥3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 3.00 1.00 4♥ N 4 ♠J 1-Munzinger-Parsons vs 2-Epner-Allison
420 3.00 1.00 4♥ N 4 ♦A 2-Bond-Chareton vs 4-Brooks-Strandberg
420 3.00 1.00 4♥ N 4 ♣K 3-Andrews-Weiner vs 1-Roth-Winsberg
140 1.00 3.00 2♥ N 3 ♣K 5-Likerman-Lindsay vs 5-Cummings-Jackson
50 0.00 4.00 4♥ N -1 ♦A 4-Mann-McMahan vs 3-Lilien-Prince
|