1 |
♠93
♥AT3
♦T763
♣9864
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ ♣4 ♥3 ♠3 NT6 |
EW: 3♣ 4/3♥ 4/3♠ ♦5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.00 0.00 4♠ E -2 ♦A 1-Nelson-Tooley vs 1-Bakst-Max
50 1.50 1.50 4♠ E -1 ♥7 5-Braunstein-Araghi vs 4-Back-Rothman
50 1.50 1.50 4♠ E -1 ♦A 4-Withers-Gerber vs 2-Barber-Bailey
170 0.00 3.00 3♥ W 4 ♦3 3-Nia-Glaser vs 5-Finnegan-Eberle
|
2 |
♠K8632
♥J
♦AK75
♣QJ5
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ ♣6 ♥3 ♠6 NT4 |
EW: 1♣ 3♥ 1♠ 3NT ♦5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 3.00 0.00 4♥ W -1 ♠6 4-Withers-Gerber vs 2-Barber-Bailey
140 2.00 1.00 2♥ W 3 ♦K 5-Braunstein-Araghi vs 4-Back-Rothman
170 1.00 2.00 3♥ W 4 ♦A 1-Nelson-Tooley vs 1-Bakst-Max
420 0.00 3.00 4♥ W 4 ♦A 3-Nia-Glaser vs 5-Finnegan-Eberle
|
3 |
♠K6
♥3
♦Q97632
♣KT65
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ ♣6 ♥6 ♠4 NT4 |
EW: 1♥ 1♠ 1NT ♣6 ♦6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 3.00 0.00 2♦ N 3 ♠3 5-Braunstein-Araghi vs 4-Back-Rothman
100 2.00 1.00 2♠ W -1 ♥3 1-Nelson-Tooley vs 1-Bakst-Max
100 1.00 2.00 3♦ N -2 ♠3 3-Nia-Glaser vs 5-Finnegan-Eberle
110 0.00 3.00 1♠ W 2 ♦6 4-Withers-Gerber vs 2-Barber-Bailey
|
4 |
♠J98654
♥Q32
♦843
♣8
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♠ ♣2 ♦0 ♥3/2 NT5/4 |
EW: 5♣ 5/4♦ 4♥ ♠4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 2.83 0.17 3♥ E 5 ♦9 5-Braunstein-Araghi vs 4-Back-Rothman
600 1.50 1.50 5♦ W 5 ♠8 4-Withers-Gerber vs 2-Barber-Bailey
620 0.17 2.83 4♥ E 4 ♠K 3-Nia-Glaser vs 5-Finnegan-Eberle
|
5 |
♠AK5
♥9874
♦K7
♣KT83
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 4♠ ♦3 ♥3 NT6 |
EW: 3♦ 3♥ 1NT ♣3 ♠3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 3.00 0.00 2♠ N 4 ♣5 1-Nelson-Tooley vs 5-Finnegan-Eberle
100 2.00 1.00 2♣ W -2 ♠K 2-Jones-Rasmussen vs 2-Barber-Bailey
110 1.00 2.00 2♥ E 2 ♠6 4-Withers-Gerber vs 1-Bakst-Max
300 0.00 3.00 2N N -3 ♦T 5-Braunstein-Araghi vs 3-Beckvall-Johnson
|
6 |
♠T42
♥K9763
♦K62
♣T5
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣1 ♦1 ♥5 ♠1 NT1 |
EW: 6♣ 6♦ 2♥ 6♠ 6NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 3.00 0.00 4♣ W 6 ♠2 1-Nelson-Tooley vs 5-Finnegan-Eberle
620 2.00 1.00 5♦ W 6 ♥7 2-Jones-Rasmussen vs 2-Barber-Bailey
660 1.00 2.00 3N W 5 ♥6 4-Withers-Gerber vs 1-Bakst-Max
1370 0.00 3.00 6♣ W 6 ♥6 5-Braunstein-Araghi vs 3-Beckvall-Johnson
|
7 |
♠T65
♥AJT2
♦T7632
♣5
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 2♥ 1NT ♣2 ♠2 |
EW: 5♣ 4♠ ♦4 ♥3 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 3.00 0.00 2♥ S 3 ♠3 5-Braunstein-Araghi vs 3-Beckvall-Johnson
140 2.00 1.00 2♠ W 3 ♥A 2-Jones-Rasmussen vs 2-Barber-Bailey
620 0.50 2.50 4♠ W 4 ♥A 1-Nelson-Tooley vs 5-Finnegan-Eberle
620 0.50 2.50 5♣ E 6 ♥4 4-Withers-Gerber vs 1-Bakst-Max
|
8 |
♠K643
♥J7
♦983
♣KQ87
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4 ♦4 ♥2 ♠1 NT4 |
EW: 2/3♣ 2♦ 4♥ 5♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 2.17 0.83 4♠ W -1 ♦3 2-Jones-Rasmussen vs 2-Barber-Bailey
50 2.17 0.83 3♥ W -1 ♦3 1-Nelson-Tooley vs 5-Finnegan-Eberle
400 0.17 2.83 3N E 3 ♦2 5-Braunstein-Araghi vs 3-Beckvall-Johnson
|
9 |
♠832
♥42
♦A94
♣97654
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 3♦ ♥4 ♠5 NT4 |
EW: 3♥ 2♠ -/1NT ♣6 ♦4 NT6/7 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
300 3.00 0.00 5♥ E -3 ♣A 1-Nelson-Tooley vs 4-Back-Rothman
140 2.00 1.00 3♥ E 3 ♥3 5-Braunstein-Araghi vs 2-Barber-Bailey
170 1.00 2.00 3♥ E 4 ♦3 2-Jones-Rasmussen vs 1-Bakst-Max
620 0.00 3.00 4♥ E 4 ♦Q 3-Nia-Glaser vs 3-Beckvall-Johnson
|
10 |
♠Q9
♥A974
♦AT6
♣QJ54
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ -/1♦ 2♥ 1♠ 2NT ♦6/7 |
EW: ♣4 ♦6 ♥5 ♠6 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
630 3.00 0.00 3N S 4 ♦7 1-Nelson-Tooley vs 4-Back-Rothman
130 2.00 1.00 4♣ N 4 ♥J 2-Jones-Rasmussen vs 1-Bakst-Max
110 1.00 2.00 2♣ S 3 ♥6 5-Braunstein-Araghi vs 2-Barber-Bailey
300 0.00 3.00 4♥ N -3 ♦9 3-Nia-Glaser vs 3-Beckvall-Johnson
|
11 |
♠J53
♥K8532
♦K85
♣Q4
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 2♦ 2♥ 1♠ 2NT |
EW: ♣6 ♦4 ♥5 ♠6 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
90 2.50 0.50 1N S 1 ♦9 2-Jones-Rasmussen vs 1-Bakst-Max
90 2.50 0.50 1N S 1 ♣5 1-Nelson-Tooley vs 4-Back-Rothman
50 1.00 2.00 2♣ W -1 ♥3 5-Braunstein-Araghi vs 2-Barber-Bailey
50 0.00 3.00 2♥ N -1 ♣T 3-Nia-Glaser vs 3-Beckvall-Johnson
|
12 |
♠K43
♥KJT98
♦T4
♣KQ8
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2/1♣ 1♥ 4♠ ♦3 NT6 |
EW: 4♦ 1NT ♣5 ♥5 ♠3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
620 3.00 0.00 4♠ S 4 ♣6 2-Jones-Rasmussen vs 1-Bakst-Max
170 2.00 1.00 3♠ S 4 ♦A 3-Nia-Glaser vs 3-Beckvall-Johnson
50 1.00 2.00 5♦ W -1 ♠K 1-Nelson-Tooley vs 4-Back-Rothman
130 0.00 3.00 4♦ W 4 ♣K 5-Braunstein-Araghi vs 2-Barber-Bailey
|
13 |
♠76
♥A63
♦AJ8764
♣63
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 5♦ 1♥ 2♠ 2/3NT |
EW: ♣6 ♦2 ♥6 ♠5 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 3.00 0.00 1♦ N 5 ♥J 1-Nelson-Tooley vs 3-Beckvall-Johnson
130 1.50 1.50 3♦ N 4 ♣7 2-Jones-Rasmussen vs 5-Finnegan-Eberle
130 1.50 1.50 2♦ N 4 ♥J 3-Nia-Glaser vs 2-Barber-Bailey
200 0.00 3.00 2N S -2 ♣2 4-Withers-Gerber vs 4-Back-Rothman
|
14 |
♠T65
♥K97
♦KQJ5
♣KJT
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣1 ♦5 ♥5 ♠1/0 NT1 |
EW: 6♣ 2♦ 2♥ 5♠ 5NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.00 0.00 3N E -2 ♣Q 2-Jones-Rasmussen vs 5-Finnegan-Eberle
120 2.00 1.00 2N E 2 ♦T 3-Nia-Glaser vs 2-Barber-Bailey
420 1.00 2.00 4♠ W 4 ♦K 1-Nelson-Tooley vs 3-Beckvall-Johnson
460 0.00 3.00 3N E 5 ♥3 4-Withers-Gerber vs 4-Back-Rothman
|
15 |
♠AKQT97
♥96
♦94
♣KJ4
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: -/1♣ 2♦ 1♥ 3♠ 2NT ♣6/7 |
EW: ♣6 ♦4/3 ♥6 ♠3 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 2.00 1.00 3♠ N 3 ♣A 4-Withers-Gerber vs 4-Back-Rothman
140 2.00 1.00 2♠ N 3 ♥8 1-Nelson-Tooley vs 3-Beckvall-Johnson
140 2.00 1.00 2♠ N 3 ♥8 3-Nia-Glaser vs 2-Barber-Bailey
200 0.00 3.00 4♠ N -2 ♥8 2-Jones-Rasmussen vs 5-Finnegan-Eberle
|
16 |
♠A
♥QT9
♦KQJ752
♣K82
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ ♣3 ♥6 ♠6 NT3 |
EW: 4♣ 3NT ♦5 ♥6 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
80 3.00 0.00 1♠ S 1 ♥5 4-Withers-Gerber vs 4-Back-Rothman
70 2.00 1.00 1♦ N 1 ♣A 3-Nia-Glaser vs 2-Barber-Bailey
50 1.00 2.00 2♠ S -1 ♦A 2-Jones-Rasmussen vs 5-Finnegan-Eberle
150 0.00 3.00 4♥ S -3 ♣3 1-Nelson-Tooley vs 3-Beckvall-Johnson
|
17 |
♠AQT72
♥J82
♦AQT4
♣2
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 2♠ ♣5 ♥4 NT5 |
EW: 1♣ 2♥ 2NT ♦6 ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
120 3.00 0.00 1N S 2 ♥A 2-Jones-Rasmussen vs 4-Back-Rothman
110 2.00 1.00 2♠ N 2 ♥6 5-Braunstein-Araghi vs 5-Finnegan-Eberle
50 1.00 2.00 3♠ N -1 ♥Q 3-Nia-Glaser vs 1-Bakst-Max
110 0.00 3.00 2♥ W 2 ♠7 4-Withers-Gerber vs 3-Beckvall-Johnson
|
18 |
♠K542
♥T752
♦T
♣Q732
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦3 ♥6 ♠6 NT4 |
EW: 1♣ 4♦ 1♥ 1♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 3.00 0.00 2♠ N 2 ♦K 3-Nia-Glaser vs 1-Bakst-Max
90 2.00 1.00 1N E 1 ♠8 2-Jones-Rasmussen vs 4-Back-Rothman
110 1.00 2.00 3♦ E 3 ♠T 5-Braunstein-Araghi vs 5-Finnegan-Eberle
180 0.00 3.00 1N E 4 ♠8 4-Withers-Gerber vs 3-Beckvall-Johnson
|
19 |
♠AQ82
♥KQJ96
♦Q9
♣65
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♥ 3♠ ♣4 ♦4 NT6 |
EW: 3♣ 3♦ ♥5 ♠3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 3.00 0.00 2♠ S 3 ♥A 5-Braunstein-Araghi vs 5-Finnegan-Eberle
50 1.50 1.50 4♠ S -1 ♦A 2-Jones-Rasmussen vs 4-Back-Rothman
50 1.50 1.50 4♠ S -1 ♣3 4-Withers-Gerber vs 3-Beckvall-Johnson
90 0.00 3.00 2♣ E 2 ♥5 3-Nia-Glaser vs 1-Bakst-Max
|
20 |
♠AT875
♥AJ
♦A4
♣KQ64
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 1♦ 4♠ 3NT ♥6 |
EW: -/1♥ ♣3 ♦6 ♥6/7 ♠2/3 NT2/3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
650 3.00 0.00 4♠ N 5 ♦5 2-Jones-Rasmussen vs 4-Back-Rothman
620 2.00 1.00 4♠ N 4 ♦6 3-Nia-Glaser vs 1-Bakst-Max
180 1.00 2.00 2N N 4 ♦5 5-Braunstein-Araghi vs 5-Finnegan-Eberle
140 0.00 3.00 3♠ N 3 ♦5 4-Withers-Gerber vs 3-Beckvall-Johnson
|