1 |
♠Q6
♥A3
♦T854
♣AJ983
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 4♦ 2♥ 2♠ 2NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦3 ♥5 ♠5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 3.00 1.00 2♦ S 5 ♠J 5-Thieken-Niedner vs 4-Brooks-Strandberg
150 3.00 1.00 2♣ W -3 ♦4 1-Coopersmith-Spiegel vs 1-Ross-Lindamood
150 3.00 1.00 2♣ W -3 ♦4 3-Andrews-Weiner vs 5-Jackson-Lennox
130 1.00 3.00 2♦ S 4 ♠J 4-Mann-McMahan vs 2-Bond-Chareton
100 0.00 4.00 2N W -2 ♣3 2-Urben-Webster vs 3-Benaderet-Curwin
|
2 |
♠Q653
♥T5
♦93
♣KQ632
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 3♠ 1NT ♦5 ♥6 |
EW: 1♦ 1♥ ♣6/5 ♠4/3 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 2.50 1.50 3♠ S 3 ♦K 5-Thieken-Niedner vs 4-Brooks-Strandberg
140 2.50 1.50 3♠ S 3 ♦2 2-Urben-Webster vs 3-Benaderet-Curwin
140 2.50 1.50 3♠ S 3 ♦2 4-Mann-McMahan vs 2-Bond-Chareton
140 2.50 1.50 2♠ S 3 ♣T 1-Coopersmith-Spiegel vs 1-Ross-Lindamood
100 0.00 4.00 4♠ S -1 ♣T 3-Andrews-Weiner vs 5-Jackson-Lennox
|
3 |
♠J62
♥K8764
♦A87
♣54
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦1 ♥3 ♠1 NT1 |
EW: 4♣ 6♦ 4♥ 6♠ 6NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 4.00 0.00 2♦ E 5 ♥2 3-Andrews-Weiner vs 5-Jackson-Lennox
620 3.00 1.00 5♦ W 6 ♥8 1-Coopersmith-Spiegel vs 1-Ross-Lindamood
660 1.50 2.50 4N E 5 ♣7 2-Urben-Webster vs 3-Benaderet-Curwin
660 1.50 2.50 3N E 5 ♣7 4-Mann-McMahan vs 2-Bond-Chareton
690 0.00 4.00 3N W 6 ♥8 5-Thieken-Niedner vs 4-Brooks-Strandberg
|
4 |
♠AK
♥AK4
♦J752
♣AKQ9
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 7♣ 7♦ 4♥ 5♠ 6NT |
EW: ♣0 ♦0 ♥3 ♠2 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
1440 4.00 0.00 6N N 6 ♠5 4-Mann-McMahan vs 2-Bond-Chareton
690 2.00 2.00 3N N 6 ♠6 1-Coopersmith-Spiegel vs 1-Ross-Lindamood
690 2.00 2.00 3N N 6 ♠5 3-Andrews-Weiner vs 5-Jackson-Lennox
690 2.00 2.00 3N N 6 ♠5 5-Thieken-Niedner vs 4-Brooks-Strandberg
640 0.00 4.00 5♣ N 7 ♣6 2-Urben-Webster vs 3-Benaderet-Curwin
|
5 |
♠9
♥KQ932
♦Q95
♣T974
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 3♥ 1NT ♣5 ♠2 |
EW: 1♣ 4♠ ♦5 ♥4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 3.00 1.00 4♠ W -1 ♥K 2-Urben-Webster vs 3-Benaderet-Curwin
50 3.00 1.00 4♠ W -1 ♥K 4-Mann-McMahan vs 2-Bond-Chareton
50 3.00 1.00 4♠ W -1 ♦5 5-Thieken-Niedner vs 4-Brooks-Strandberg
140 1.00 3.00 2♠ W 3 ♦5 1-Coopersmith-Spiegel vs 1-Ross-Lindamood
420 0.00 4.00 4♠ W 4 ♦9 3-Andrews-Weiner vs 5-Jackson-Lennox
|
6 |
♠9865
♥AQJT4
♦QT2
♣9
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ ♣0 ♦6 ♠0 NT0 |
EW: 5♣ 1♦ 5♠ 2NT ♥5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 4.00 0.00 4♣ W 5 ♥A 3-Andrews-Weiner vs 4-Brooks-Strandberg
170 3.00 1.00 3♣ W 6 ♠5 1-Coopersmith-Spiegel vs 5-Jackson-Lennox
600 1.00 3.00 5♣ W 5 ♥A 2-Urben-Webster vs 2-Bond-Chareton
600 1.00 3.00 5♣ W 5 ♥A 4-Mann-McMahan vs 1-Ross-Lindamood
600 1.00 3.00 5♣ W 5 ♥A 5-Thieken-Niedner vs 3-Benaderet-Curwin
|
7 |
♠A543
♥AT7
♦AQ86
♣93
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2/1♦ 3♠ 2NT ♣3 ♥5 |
EW: 4♣ 1♥ ♦5 ♠4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 3.50 0.50 3♠ S 4 ♥2 5-Thieken-Niedner vs 3-Benaderet-Curwin
170 3.50 0.50 2♠ S 4 ♣A 4-Mann-McMahan vs 1-Ross-Lindamood
140 1.00 3.00 3♠ S 3 ♣A 2-Urben-Webster vs 2-Bond-Chareton
140 1.00 3.00 3♠ S 3 ♣K 3-Andrews-Weiner vs 4-Brooks-Strandberg
140 1.00 3.00 2♠ S 3 ♦9 1-Coopersmith-Spiegel vs 5-Jackson-Lennox
|
8 |
♠J4
♥AQT83
♦KQ7
♣KJ9
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦6 ♥4 ♠4 NT4 |
EW: 3♣ 3♥ 3♠ 2NT ♦6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 2.50 1.50 2N W 3 ♥8 1-Coopersmith-Spiegel vs 5-Jackson-Lennox
150 2.50 1.50 2N W 3 ♥3 2-Urben-Webster vs 2-Bond-Chareton
150 2.50 1.50 2N E 3 ♥5 3-Andrews-Weiner vs 4-Brooks-Strandberg
150 2.50 1.50 2♥ N -3 ♠7 4-Mann-McMahan vs 1-Ross-Lindamood
490 0.00 4.00 2N* W 2 ♥8 5-Thieken-Niedner vs 3-Benaderet-Curwin
|
9 |
♠KJT7
♥T6
♦J874
♣J93
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1/-♣ ♣7/6 ♦4 ♥6 ♠6 NT5 |
EW: 3♦ 1♠ 2NT ♣6 ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.00 0.00 3♦ W -1 ♠J 5-Thieken-Niedner vs 3-Benaderet-Curwin
90 2.50 1.50 2♦ W 2 ♥T 3-Andrews-Weiner vs 4-Brooks-Strandberg
90 2.50 1.50 2♦ W 2 ♥T 4-Mann-McMahan vs 1-Ross-Lindamood
600 0.50 3.50 3N E 3 ♥8 2-Urben-Webster vs 2-Bond-Chareton
600 0.50 3.50 3N E 3 ♣6 1-Coopersmith-Spiegel vs 5-Jackson-Lennox
|
10 |
♠J6
♥J9872
♦T9742
♣5
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣1 ♦6 ♥6 ♠1 NT1 |
EW: 6♣ 1♦ 1♥ 6♠ 6NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.00 0.00 6♠ W -1 ♥9 5-Thieken-Niedner vs 3-Benaderet-Curwin
600 3.00 1.00 5♣ E 5 ♥T 2-Urben-Webster vs 2-Bond-Chareton
620 2.00 2.00 4♠ W 4 ♥9 1-Coopersmith-Spiegel vs 5-Jackson-Lennox
680 0.50 3.50 4♠ W 6 ♥9 4-Mann-McMahan vs 1-Ross-Lindamood
680 0.50 3.50 4♠ W 6 ♣5 3-Andrews-Weiner vs 4-Brooks-Strandberg
|
11 |
♠KQ4
♥AKQJT4
♦3
♣QT7
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♥ 1♠ 1NT ♣5 ♦2 |
EW: 1♣ 5♦ ♥3 ♠6 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 2.00 2.00 4♥ N 4 ♦A 2-Urben-Webster vs 1-Ross-Lindamood
420 2.00 2.00 4♥ N 4 ♦A 4-Mann-McMahan vs 5-Jackson-Lennox
420 2.00 2.00 4♥ N 4 ♦A 5-Thieken-Niedner vs 2-Bond-Chareton
420 2.00 2.00 4♥ N 4 ♣9 1-Coopersmith-Spiegel vs 4-Brooks-Strandberg
420 2.00 2.00 4♥ N 4 ♣9 3-Andrews-Weiner vs 3-Benaderet-Curwin
|
12 |
♠J5
♥KT42
♦Q65
♣KT95
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 3♦ 4♥ 1♠ 3/2NT |
EW: ♣5 ♦4 ♥3 ♠6 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 4.00 0.00 3♥ N 4 ♣6 1-Coopersmith-Spiegel vs 4-Brooks-Strandberg
140 3.00 1.00 3♥ N 3 ♣A 4-Mann-McMahan vs 5-Jackson-Lennox
100 1.00 3.00 4♥ S -1 ♠4 5-Thieken-Niedner vs 2-Bond-Chareton
100 1.00 3.00 4♥ S -1 ♠2 2-Urben-Webster vs 1-Ross-Lindamood
100 1.00 3.00 4♥ S -1 ♣6 3-Andrews-Weiner vs 3-Benaderet-Curwin
|
13 |
♠AQ5
♥KJ854
♦532
♣J4
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1/-♣ 3♠ 1NT ♣7/6 ♦5 ♥5 |
EW: 1♦ 1♥ ♣6 ♠4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 3.00 1.00 2N E -2 ♠8 2-Urben-Webster vs 1-Ross-Lindamood
200 3.00 1.00 1N E -2 ♠8 3-Andrews-Weiner vs 3-Benaderet-Curwin
200 3.00 1.00 1N E -2 ♠5 1-Coopersmith-Spiegel vs 4-Brooks-Strandberg
100 0.50 3.50 1N E -1 ♠J 4-Mann-McMahan vs 5-Jackson-Lennox
100 0.50 3.50 1N E -1 ♠J 5-Thieken-Niedner vs 2-Bond-Chareton
|
14 |
♠73
♥873
♦KQ53
♣KJT5
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 2♦ ♥3 ♠3 NT6 |
EW: 2♥ 2♠ 1NT ♣4 ♦5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.50 0.50 4♠ E -2 ♦J 1-Coopersmith-Spiegel vs 4-Brooks-Strandberg
100 3.50 0.50 4♠ E -2 ♦6 3-Andrews-Weiner vs 3-Benaderet-Curwin
50 1.50 2.50 3♠ E -1 ♦6 5-Thieken-Niedner vs 2-Bond-Chareton
50 1.50 2.50 3♠ E -1 ♣9 2-Urben-Webster vs 1-Ross-Lindamood
140 0.00 4.00 2♠ E 3 ♣9 4-Mann-McMahan vs 5-Jackson-Lennox
|
15 |
♠T
♥Q76543
♦95
♣KQ82
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 1♦ 3♥ 1NT ♠5 |
EW: 2♠ ♣4 ♦6 ♥3 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
620 4.00 0.00 4♥ S 4 ♠Q 4-Mann-McMahan vs 5-Jackson-Lennox
170 2.50 1.50 3♥ S 4 ♠4 2-Urben-Webster vs 1-Ross-Lindamood
170 2.50 1.50 3♥ S 4 ♣9 3-Andrews-Weiner vs 3-Benaderet-Curwin
100 0.50 3.50 4♥ S -1 ♣9 1-Coopersmith-Spiegel vs 4-Brooks-Strandberg
100 0.50 3.50 4♥ S -1 ♣9 5-Thieken-Niedner vs 2-Bond-Chareton
|
16 |
♠532
♥QJ954
♦AJ7
♣53
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ ♣0 ♥4/5 ♠0/5 NT0 |
EW: 5♣ 2♠ ♦6 ♥6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.00 0.00 3♦ S -2 ♣Q 5-Thieken-Niedner vs 1-Ross-Lindamood
150 2.50 1.50 4♣ E 5 ♦K 1-Coopersmith-Spiegel vs 3-Benaderet-Curwin
150 2.50 1.50 3♣ E 5 ♥A 2-Urben-Webster vs 5-Jackson-Lennox
200 1.00 3.00 5♦ S -4 ♠A 4-Mann-McMahan vs 4-Brooks-Strandberg
600 0.00 4.00 5♣ E 5 ♦K 3-Andrews-Weiner vs 2-Bond-Chareton
|
17 |
♠A64
♥QT9
♦AT975
♣QT
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♦ 5♠ 1NT ♣6 ♥6 |
EW: 1♣ 1♥ ♦1 ♠1 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
450 4.00 0.00 4♠ S 5 ♥5 2-Urben-Webster vs 5-Jackson-Lennox
420 3.00 1.00 4♠ S 4 ♣A 3-Andrews-Weiner vs 2-Bond-Chareton
200 1.00 3.00 3♠ S 5 ♥8 1-Coopersmith-Spiegel vs 3-Benaderet-Curwin
200 1.00 3.00 3♠ S 5 ♥5 5-Thieken-Niedner vs 1-Ross-Lindamood
200 1.00 3.00 1♠ S 5 ♣A 4-Mann-McMahan vs 4-Brooks-Strandberg
|
18 |
♠962
♥83
♦KQT3
♣A853
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ ♦5 ♥6 ♠4 NT4 |
EW: 2♦ 1♥ 3♠ 2/3NT ♣5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 4.00 0.00 4♠ E -1 ♥J 4-Mann-McMahan vs 4-Brooks-Strandberg
150 2.50 1.50 2N W 3 ♦K 1-Coopersmith-Spiegel vs 3-Benaderet-Curwin
150 2.50 1.50 2N W 3 ♦K 5-Thieken-Niedner vs 1-Ross-Lindamood
170 1.00 3.00 2♠ W 4 ♦3 3-Andrews-Weiner vs 2-Bond-Chareton
400 0.00 4.00 3N W 3 ♣5 2-Urben-Webster vs 5-Jackson-Lennox
|
19 |
♠Q6542
♥J9
♦KQ6
♣QT7
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♠ ♣2 ♦4 ♥5 NT5 |
EW: 4♣ 3♦ 2♥ ♠5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.00 0.00 3N W -1 ♠6 1-Coopersmith-Spiegel vs 3-Benaderet-Curwin
50 2.50 1.50 4♠ S -1 ♣6 3-Andrews-Weiner vs 2-Bond-Chareton
50 2.50 1.50 2♠ N -1 ♦2 4-Mann-McMahan vs 4-Brooks-Strandberg
100 1.00 3.00 3♠ N -2 ♣A 5-Thieken-Niedner vs 1-Ross-Lindamood
130 0.00 4.00 3♦ W 4 ♥J 2-Urben-Webster vs 5-Jackson-Lennox
|
20 |
♠AJ874
♥2
♦KJ43
♣A64
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 1♥ 4♠ 3/4NT ♣6 |
EW: 1♣ ♦5 ♥5 ♠3 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
620 4.00 0.00 4♠ N 4 ♣Q 3-Andrews-Weiner vs 2-Bond-Chareton
140 2.50 1.50 2♠ N 3 ♣Q 1-Coopersmith-Spiegel vs 3-Benaderet-Curwin
140 2.50 1.50 2♠ N 3 ♣Q 4-Mann-McMahan vs 4-Brooks-Strandberg
100 0.50 3.50 4♠ N -1 ♣Q 2-Urben-Webster vs 5-Jackson-Lennox
100 0.50 3.50 4♠ N -1 ♣Q 5-Thieken-Niedner vs 1-Ross-Lindamood
|
21 |
♠86532
♥T
♦J83
♣Q875
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2/-♣ 2/3♦ -/1♥ 4♠ ♣8/5 ♥6/7 NT6/5 |
EW: 1/-NT ♣5 ♦4 ♥6 ♠3 NT7/6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 4.00 0.00 2♦ S 3 ♣T 5-Thieken-Niedner vs 5-Jackson-Lennox
100 3.00 1.00 2♣ E -2 ♠A 2-Urben-Webster vs 4-Brooks-Strandberg
90 1.50 2.50 2♦ S 2 ♣T 1-Coopersmith-Spiegel vs 2-Bond-Chareton
90 1.50 2.50 2♦ S 2 ♣T 4-Mann-McMahan vs 3-Benaderet-Curwin
200 0.00 4.00 2♥ S -2 ♣T 3-Andrews-Weiner vs 1-Ross-Lindamood
|
22 |
♠J965
♥KJ62
♦AKQ3
♣3
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 4♥ 4♠ 1NT ♣6 |
EW: 1♣ ♦6 ♥3 ♠3 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 4.00 0.00 4♥ S 4 ♦T 5-Thieken-Niedner vs 5-Jackson-Lennox
170 2.00 2.00 3♠ S 4 ♣5 3-Andrews-Weiner vs 1-Ross-Lindamood
170 2.00 2.00 3♥ S 4 ♦T 2-Urben-Webster vs 4-Brooks-Strandberg
170 2.00 2.00 2♥ S 4 ♠A 1-Coopersmith-Spiegel vs 2-Bond-Chareton
140 0.00 4.00 3♥ S 3 ♣2 4-Mann-McMahan vs 3-Benaderet-Curwin
|
23 |
♠J8642
♥53
♦QJ653
♣J
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ 2♥ ♣1 ♠4 NT3 |
EW: 5♣ 3/2♠ 4NT ♦4 ♥5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
130 4.00 0.00 4♣ W 4 ♦A 4-Mann-McMahan vs 3-Benaderet-Curwin
150 2.50 1.50 4♣ W 5 ♥5 1-Coopersmith-Spiegel vs 2-Bond-Chareton
150 2.50 1.50 3♣ W 5 ♥2 2-Urben-Webster vs 4-Brooks-Strandberg
600 0.50 3.50 5♣ W 5 ♥5 3-Andrews-Weiner vs 1-Ross-Lindamood
600 0.50 3.50 5♣ E 5 ♥5 5-Thieken-Niedner vs 5-Jackson-Lennox
|
24 |
♠K82
♥J
♦AT942
♣K964
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 2♦ 1♥ 1NT ♠5 |
EW: 2♠ ♣4 ♦5 ♥6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 3.00 1.00 2♠ W -1 ♥J 4-Mann-McMahan vs 3-Benaderet-Curwin
50 3.00 1.00 2♠ W -1 ♥J 5-Thieken-Niedner vs 5-Jackson-Lennox
50 3.00 1.00 1♥ W -1 ♥J 3-Andrews-Weiner vs 1-Ross-Lindamood
50 1.00 3.00 2N N -1 ♠3 2-Urben-Webster vs 4-Brooks-Strandberg
140 0.00 4.00 2♠ E 3 ♣6 1-Coopersmith-Spiegel vs 2-Bond-Chareton
|
25 |
♠K83
♥Q3
♦QT85
♣K985
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 2♦ 1NT ♥4 ♠6 |
EW: 3♥ 1♠ ♣6 ♦5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
120 4.00 0.00 1N N 2 ♠2 5-Thieken-Niedner vs 5-Jackson-Lennox
90 3.00 1.00 1N N 1 ♥4 3-Andrews-Weiner vs 1-Ross-Lindamood
50 1.00 3.00 3N S -1 ♣3 4-Mann-McMahan vs 3-Benaderet-Curwin
50 1.00 3.00 3N N -1 ♠6 1-Coopersmith-Spiegel vs 2-Bond-Chareton
50 1.00 3.00 2♦ S -1 ♠J 2-Urben-Webster vs 4-Brooks-Strandberg
|