1 |
♠7
♥KQ7643
♦K3
♣K742
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 2♥ ♦5 ♠4 NT5 |
EW: 2♦ 3♠ 2NT ♣4 ♥5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 2.00 0.00 2♥ N 3 ♠T 1-Fisher-Beckvall vs 1-Barber-Johnson
110 1.00 1.00 2♥ N 2 ♣5 2-Rothman-Back vs 3-Finnegan-Kalman
140 0.00 2.00 3♠ W 3 ♥K 3-McClelion-Baker vs 2-Withers-Kovach
|
2 |
♠9743
♥Q
♦AT
♣AKJ654
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 4♠ 2NT ♦5/4 ♥4 |
EW: 2♦ 3♥ ♣3 ♠2 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
130 2.00 0.00 3♣ N 4 ♥A 1-Fisher-Beckvall vs 1-Barber-Johnson
50 1.00 1.00 4♥ W -1 ♠A 2-Rothman-Back vs 3-Finnegan-Kalman
100 0.00 2.00 5♣ N -1 ♥A 3-McClelion-Baker vs 2-Withers-Kovach
|
3 |
♠T982
♥9
♦T4
♣AKJ752
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 2♠ 1NT ♦5 ♥5 |
EW: 1♦ 2/-♥ ♣6/5 ♥8/6 ♠5/4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
300 1.50 0.50 3N E -3 ♥A 2-Rothman-Back vs 3-Finnegan-Kalman
300 1.50 0.50 2N E -3 ♥6 3-McClelion-Baker vs 2-Withers-Kovach
150 0.00 2.00 4♠ N -3 ♦A 1-Fisher-Beckvall vs 1-Barber-Johnson
|
4 |
♠KJ7
♥JT6
♦A82
♣KJ62
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♦ 3♥ 3♠ 4NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦5 ♥3 ♠3 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
600 2.00 0.00 3N N 3 ♥3 2-Rothman-Back vs 3-Finnegan-Kalman
140 1.00 1.00 1♥ S 3 ♠5 3-McClelion-Baker vs 2-Withers-Kovach
200 0.00 2.00 4♠ N -2 ♥A 1-Fisher-Beckvall vs 1-Barber-Johnson
|
5 |
♠AK93
♥8
♦QJ8643
♣32
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 4♠ ♣5 ♥5 NT6 |
EW: 1♣ 2♥ 1NT ♦4 ♠3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 2.00 0.00 4♥ W -2 ♣3 1-Fisher-Beckvall vs 1-Barber-Johnson
50 1.00 1.00 3♥ W -1 ♦Q 3-McClelion-Baker vs 2-Withers-Kovach
110 0.00 2.00 2♥ W 2 ♠A 2-Rothman-Back vs 3-Finnegan-Kalman
|
6 |
♠KQ752
♥5
♦AQJ2
♣KQ3
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 3♦ 2♥ 1♠ 1NT |
EW: ♣3 ♦3 ♥5 ♠6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 2.00 0.00 1♠ N 2 ♦3 1-Fisher-Beckvall vs 1-Barber-Johnson
110 1.00 1.00 1♠ W 2 ♠2 3-McClelion-Baker vs 2-Withers-Kovach
200 0.00 2.00 3N S -4 ♠3 2-Rothman-Back vs 3-Finnegan-Kalman
|
7 |
♠Q63
♥K954
♦T97
♣AT3
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ 2♠ ♣3 ♥5 NT6 |
EW: 3♣ 2♥ ♦4 ♠4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 2.00 0.00 3N E -2 ♠7 1-Fisher-Beckvall vs 1-Barber-Johnson
100 1.00 1.00 3♣ W -1 ♠5 3-McClelion-Baker vs 2-Withers-Kovach
600 0.00 2.00 3N E 3 ♠A 2-Rothman-Back vs 3-Finnegan-Kalman
|
8 |
♠53
♥AJT8
♦A752
♣A65
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1/2♣ 3/4♦ 3/4♥ 1/3NT ♠5 |
EW: 2♠ ♣5 ♦3 ♥3 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 2.00 0.00 4♥ S 4 ♣T 2-Rothman-Back vs 2-Withers-Kovach
50 1.00 1.00 3♥ S -1 ♦4 3-McClelion-Baker vs 1-Barber-Johnson
100 0.00 2.00 4♥ S -2 ♦4 1-Fisher-Beckvall vs 3-Finnegan-Kalman
|
9 |
♠92
♥A94
♦J7
♣QT9752
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6 ♦4 ♥5 ♠4 NT4 |
EW: 1♣ 3♦ 2♥ 3♠ 2NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 2.00 0.00 3♠ W -2 ♣7 2-Rothman-Back vs 2-Withers-Kovach
140 0.50 1.50 2♠ W 3 ♦J 1-Fisher-Beckvall vs 3-Finnegan-Kalman
140 0.50 1.50 2♠ W 3 ♣T 3-McClelion-Baker vs 1-Barber-Johnson
|
10 |
♠T8643
♥K7
♦J984
♣T6
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣0 ♦1 ♥1 ♠5 NT1 |
EW: 7♣ 6♦ 6♥ 2♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 2.00 0.00 2♥ W 3 ♠4 2-Rothman-Back vs 2-Withers-Kovach
630 1.00 1.00 3N E 4 ♠7 1-Fisher-Beckvall vs 3-Finnegan-Kalman
1440 0.00 2.00 6N E 6 ♠K 3-McClelion-Baker vs 1-Barber-Johnson
|
11 |
♠K9
♥KT96532
♦4
♣964
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♥ ♣5 ♦2 ♠4 NT4 |
EW: 1♣ 5♦ 3♠ 2NT ♥5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 2.00 0.00 5♦ E -1 ♠J 2-Rothman-Back vs 2-Withers-Kovach
100 1.00 1.00 3♥* N -1 ♣K 1-Fisher-Beckvall vs 3-Finnegan-Kalman
110 0.00 2.00 3♦ W 3 ♦4 3-McClelion-Baker vs 1-Barber-Johnson
|
12 |
♠K8653
♥AQ
♦Q962
♣Q2
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2/1♥ 3♠ ♣2/1 ♦3/2 NT2 |
EW: 5♣ 4♦ 2NT ♥5 ♠3/4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 2.00 0.00 2♠ N 2 ♦7 1-Fisher-Beckvall vs 3-Finnegan-Kalman
100 1.00 1.00 4♣ E -2 ♠A 2-Rothman-Back vs 2-Withers-Kovach
200 0.00 2.00 4♠ N -2 ♦A 3-McClelion-Baker vs 1-Barber-Johnson
|
13 |
♠532
♥J43
♦T76
♣QJ83
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 1♠ 1NT ♦5 ♥6 |
EW: 2♦ 1♥ ♣5 ♠6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
630 2.00 0.00 3N S 4 ♠2 2-Rothman-Back vs 2-Withers-Kovach
100 1.00 1.00 2N S -1 ♦5 3-McClelion-Baker vs 1-Barber-Johnson
200 0.00 2.00 3N S -2 ♦2 1-Fisher-Beckvall vs 3-Finnegan-Kalman
|
14 |
♠A6
♥AK763
♦K84
♣J73
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 5♦ 5♥ 2♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣2 ♦2 ♥2 ♠5 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
400 2.00 0.00 3N N 3 ♦3 3-McClelion-Baker vs 1-Barber-Johnson
150 0.50 1.50 3♠ E -3 ♥9 1-Fisher-Beckvall vs 3-Finnegan-Kalman
150 0.50 1.50 3♠ E -3 ♣K 2-Rothman-Back vs 2-Withers-Kovach
|
15 |
♠Q3
♥AKQ3
♦AJT8
♣754
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 2/1♥ 2/3♠ ♣5 NT6 |
EW: 2♣ 1NT ♦5/6 ♥5 ♠4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 2.00 0.00 2♠ N 3 ♣9 1-Fisher-Beckvall vs 2-Withers-Kovach
100 1.00 1.00 3♥ N -1 ♠9 3-McClelion-Baker vs 3-Finnegan-Kalman
400 0.00 2.00 3N N -4 ♣A 2-Rothman-Back vs 1-Barber-Johnson
|
16 |
♠A8
♥AKJT85
♦AQ5
♣K3
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 2♦ 5♥ 4NT ♠6 |
EW: 1♠ ♣3 ♦5 ♥2 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
450 1.50 0.50 4♥ N 5 ♦4 2-Rothman-Back vs 1-Barber-Johnson
450 1.50 0.50 4♥ N 5 ♦4 3-McClelion-Baker vs 3-Finnegan-Kalman
420 0.00 2.00 4♥ N 4 ♠3 1-Fisher-Beckvall vs 2-Withers-Kovach
|
17 |
♠T
♥KQ83
♦QJ965
♣752
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♦ 2♥ 3♠ 1NT ♣5 |
EW: 2♣ ♦1 ♥5 ♠3 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 2.00 0.00 2♠ S 4 ♣K 2-Rothman-Back vs 1-Barber-Johnson
140 1.00 1.00 2♠ S 3 ♣A 1-Fisher-Beckvall vs 2-Withers-Kovach
110 0.00 2.00 2♠ S 2 ♣A 3-McClelion-Baker vs 3-Finnegan-Kalman
|
18 |
♠KQT
♥QJT7
♦Q4
♣AKQJ
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 2♦ 1♥ 2♠ 2NT |
EW: ♣6 ♦3 ♥6 ♠5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
120 1.50 0.50 2N N 2 ♥6 1-Fisher-Beckvall vs 2-Withers-Kovach
120 1.50 0.50 2N N 2 ♣5 3-McClelion-Baker vs 3-Finnegan-Kalman
200 0.00 2.00 2♣ N -2 ♥3 2-Rothman-Back vs 1-Barber-Johnson
|
19 |
♠K9
♥AQJ86
♦642
♣JT3
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 2♥ 2NT ♦6 ♠6 |
EW: 1♠ ♣2 ♦6 ♥4 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 2.00 0.00 2♥ N 4 ♣A 1-Fisher-Beckvall vs 2-Withers-Kovach
130 1.00 1.00 4♣ S 4 ♥3 3-McClelion-Baker vs 3-Finnegan-Kalman
50 0.00 2.00 3N S -1 ♦3 2-Rothman-Back vs 1-Barber-Johnson
|
20 |
♠A94
♥KQJ96
♦AK86
♣K
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2/3♦ 5♥ 3♠ 1NT ♣5 |
EW: 2♣ ♦4 ♥2 ♠3 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
650 2.00 0.00 4♥ N 5 ♣8 1-Fisher-Beckvall vs 2-Withers-Kovach
620 1.00 1.00 4♥ N 4 ♣Q 2-Rothman-Back vs 1-Barber-Johnson
200 0.00 2.00 3♥ N 5 ♣8 3-McClelion-Baker vs 3-Finnegan-Kalman
|
21 |
♠KJT6
♥QJ83
♦AJ6
♣74
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1/2♣ 2♦ 3♥ 4/5♠ 2NT |
EW: ♣5 ♦5 ♥3 ♠2 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
650 2.00 0.00 4♠ S 5 ♣8 1-Fisher-Beckvall vs 2-Withers-Kovach
620 1.00 1.00 4♠ S 4 ♣8 3-McClelion-Baker vs 3-Finnegan-Kalman
200 0.00 2.00 3N S -2 ♣8 2-Rothman-Back vs 1-Barber-Johnson
|