1 |
♠KT9
♥63
♦A8432
♣AJT
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ 2♠ 1NT ♣6 ♥6 |
EW: 1♣ 1♥ ♦4 ♠5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 3.00 0.00 2♥ E -1 ♦J 1-Rothman-Olgin vs 1-Knode-Sacks
100 2.00 1.00 2♦ N -2 ♥A 2-Urben-Baronofsky vs 2-Hargest-Hargest
110 0.50 2.50 2♥ E 2 ♦5 3-Curwin-Benaderet vs 3-Poncher-Hendrix
110 0.50 2.50 2♥ E 2 ♣2 4-Chernis-Sherman vs 4-Burchfield-Burchfield
|
2 |
♠KJ53
♥K53
♦A954
♣A7
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 4♥ 4♠ 1NT ♦5 |
EW: 2♦ ♣5 ♥2/3 ♠2 NT4/5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 3.00 0.00 2N E -4 ♥4 3-Curwin-Benaderet vs 3-Poncher-Hendrix
50 2.00 1.00 2N E -1 ♠T 4-Chernis-Sherman vs 4-Burchfield-Burchfield
90 1.00 2.00 2♦ W 2 ♣A 1-Rothman-Olgin vs 1-Knode-Sacks
130 0.00 3.00 2♦ W 4 ♥3 2-Urben-Baronofsky vs 2-Hargest-Hargest
|
3 |
♠KJT93
♥Q4
♦A4
♣JT86
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 1♠ 1NT ♦4 ♥5/4 |
EW: 2♦ 2♥ ♣4 ♠4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 3.00 0.00 2♠ N 3 ♦T 4-Chernis-Sherman vs 4-Burchfield-Burchfield
110 1.50 1.50 3♣ S 3 ♦K 3-Curwin-Benaderet vs 3-Poncher-Hendrix
110 1.50 1.50 2♣ S 3 ♦K 1-Rothman-Olgin vs 1-Knode-Sacks
100 0.00 3.00 3N N -2 ♦5 2-Urben-Baronofsky vs 2-Hargest-Hargest
|
4 |
♠T74
♥962
♦AQT
♣QJ65
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 1♦ 3♥ 3♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣5 ♦5/6 ♥3 ♠4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 2.50 0.50 3♥ S 3 ♦J 4-Chernis-Sherman vs 4-Burchfield-Burchfield
140 2.50 0.50 2♥ S 3 ♣8 2-Urben-Baronofsky vs 2-Hargest-Hargest
110 0.50 2.50 2♥ S 2 ♦5 1-Rothman-Olgin vs 1-Knode-Sacks
110 0.50 2.50 2♥ S 2 ♦5 3-Curwin-Benaderet vs 3-Poncher-Hendrix
|
5 |
♠AJ82
♥T982
♦A765
♣5
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♥ 4♠ 2NT ♣5 ♦6 |
EW: 1♣ ♦6 ♥5 ♠3 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.00 0.00 4♣ W -2 ♠A 4-Chernis-Sherman vs 4-Burchfield-Burchfield
50 2.00 1.00 3♣ W -1 ♥T 3-Curwin-Benaderet vs 3-Poncher-Hendrix
110 1.00 2.00 2♣ W 3 ♥T 2-Urben-Baronofsky vs 2-Hargest-Hargest
130 0.00 3.00 2♣ W 4 ♥T 1-Rothman-Olgin vs 1-Knode-Sacks
|
6 |
♠T62
♥KQ2
♦AT63
♣Q42
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♠ ♣5/4 ♦5 ♥5 NT6 |
EW: 2♣ 2♦ 2♥ ♠6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 3.00 0.00 1N E -2 ♠4 1-Rothman-Olgin vs 1-Knode-Sacks
110 2.00 1.00 2♠ S 2 ♣9 3-Curwin-Benaderet vs 3-Poncher-Hendrix
100 1.00 2.00 2N E -1 ♠4 2-Urben-Baronofsky vs 2-Hargest-Hargest
PASS 0.00 3.00 Pass Out 4-Chernis-Sherman vs 4-Burchfield-Burchfield
|
7 |
♠Q3
♥Q2
♦A54
♣AKJ974
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 2♦ 3/4♥ 5NT ♠6 |
EW: ♣2 ♦5 ♥2 ♠6 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
620 3.00 0.00 5♣ N 6 ♥3 4-Chernis-Sherman vs 4-Burchfield-Burchfield
600 2.00 1.00 5♣ N 5 ♦J 1-Rothman-Olgin vs 1-Knode-Sacks
130 1.00 2.00 3♣ N 4 ♠2 3-Curwin-Benaderet vs 3-Poncher-Hendrix
100 0.00 3.00 5♣ S -1 ♠4 2-Urben-Baronofsky vs 2-Hargest-Hargest
|
8 |
♠432
♥KJ6
♦A9
♣AJ764
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 4♦ 2♥ ♠4 NT4 |
EW: 3♠ ♣3 ♦3 ♥4 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.00 0.00 4♠* E -1 ♠7 3-Curwin-Benaderet vs 2-Hargest-Hargest
50 1.50 1.50 4♠ E -1 ♣K 1-Rothman-Olgin vs 4-Burchfield-Burchfield
50 1.50 1.50 4♠ E -1 ♣K 4-Chernis-Sherman vs 3-Poncher-Hendrix
100 0.00 3.00 5♣ N -2 ♠A 2-Urben-Baronofsky vs 1-Knode-Sacks
|
9 |
♠74
♥AQ854
♦AKJ
♣AK5
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 3♥ 2♠ 3NT ♦5 |
EW: 1/2♦ ♣5 ♥4 ♠4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 2.50 0.50 3♠ N 3 ♣7 3-Curwin-Benaderet vs 2-Hargest-Hargest
140 2.50 0.50 1♥ N 3 ♠A 2-Urben-Baronofsky vs 1-Knode-Sacks
110 0.50 2.50 2♥ N 2 ♦2 4-Chernis-Sherman vs 3-Poncher-Hendrix
110 0.50 2.50 1♥ N 2 ♠A 1-Rothman-Olgin vs 4-Burchfield-Burchfield
|
10 |
♠J93
♥97
♦T32
♣J9743
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5/4 ♦6 ♥0 ♠1 NT1 |
EW: 2♣ 1♦ 6♥ 6♠ 5NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
230 3.00 0.00 2♠ E 6 ♦K 2-Urben-Baronofsky vs 1-Knode-Sacks
650 2.00 1.00 4♠ E 5 ♣A 1-Rothman-Olgin vs 4-Burchfield-Burchfield
680 0.50 2.50 4♠ E 6 ♥Q 4-Chernis-Sherman vs 3-Poncher-Hendrix
680 0.50 2.50 4♥ W 6 ♦K 3-Curwin-Benaderet vs 2-Hargest-Hargest
|
11 |
♠94
♥432
♦Q762
♣J986
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♦ ♥6 ♠5 NT6 |
EW: 1♥ 2♠ ♣6 ♦6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
300 3.00 0.00 4♠* W -2 ♣6 3-Curwin-Benaderet vs 2-Hargest-Hargest
50 1.50 1.50 2N S -1 ♠6 4-Chernis-Sherman vs 3-Poncher-Hendrix
50 1.50 1.50 1N S -1 ♠6 2-Urben-Baronofsky vs 1-Knode-Sacks
100 0.00 3.00 2N S -2 ♥K 1-Rothman-Olgin vs 4-Burchfield-Burchfield
|
12 |
♠AQ95
♥KQ7
♦QT642
♣J
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ 5♥ 1♠ 2/3NT ♣5 |
EW: 1♣ ♦3 ♥2 ♠5 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
620 2.50 0.50 4♥ S 4 ♠2 2-Urben-Baronofsky vs 1-Knode-Sacks
620 2.50 0.50 4♥ S 4 ♦5 3-Curwin-Benaderet vs 2-Hargest-Hargest
200 1.00 2.00 3♥ S 5 ♣9 1-Rothman-Olgin vs 4-Burchfield-Burchfield
170 0.00 3.00 3♥ S 4 ♠2 4-Chernis-Sherman vs 3-Poncher-Hendrix
|
13 |
♠KQ87
♥A542
♦975
♣32
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣2 ♦2 ♥4 ♠3 NT2 |
EW: 5♣ 5♦ 3♥ 4♠ 5NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 3.00 0.00 6N W -2 ♥A 1-Rothman-Olgin vs 4-Burchfield-Burchfield
130 2.00 1.00 3♦ E 4 ♠T 3-Curwin-Benaderet vs 2-Hargest-Hargest
630 1.00 2.00 3N W 4 ♠K 2-Urben-Baronofsky vs 1-Knode-Sacks
660 0.00 3.00 3N E 5 ♣5 4-Chernis-Sherman vs 3-Poncher-Hendrix
|
14 |
♠JT62
♥Q3
♦75
♣AK963
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 3♠ 2NT ♦5 ♥5 |
EW: 2♦ 2♥ ♣4 ♠4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 3.00 0.00 1♠ S 3 ♣Q 1-Rothman-Olgin vs 4-Burchfield-Burchfield
50 2.00 1.00 3♦ E -1 ♠A 4-Chernis-Sherman vs 3-Poncher-Hendrix
PASS 1.00 2.00 Pass Out 3-Curwin-Benaderet vs 2-Hargest-Hargest
110 0.00 3.00 2♥ W 2 ♣A 2-Urben-Baronofsky vs 1-Knode-Sacks
|
15 |
♠AKT75
♥7653
♦5
♣Q65
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ ♦2/3 ♥3 ♠6 NT2/6 |
EW: 4♦ 2♥ 1NT ♣5 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 2.50 0.50 4♥ W -1 ♠A 1-Rothman-Olgin vs 3-Poncher-Hendrix
50 2.50 0.50 4♦ W -1 ♠A 2-Urben-Baronofsky vs 4-Burchfield-Burchfield
130 0.50 2.50 4♦ W 4 ♠A 3-Curwin-Benaderet vs 1-Knode-Sacks
130 0.50 2.50 3♦ W 4 ♠A 4-Chernis-Sherman vs 2-Hargest-Hargest
|
16 |
♠T86
♥95
♦AJ4
♣97532
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦5 ♥3 ♠3 NT3 |
EW: 2♣ 2♦ 4♥ 4♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 3.00 0.00 4♥ W -2 ♠6 2-Urben-Baronofsky vs 4-Burchfield-Burchfield
620 1.50 1.50 4♥ E 4 ♠A 1-Rothman-Olgin vs 3-Poncher-Hendrix
620 1.50 1.50 4♥ E 4 ♦3 3-Curwin-Benaderet vs 1-Knode-Sacks
630 0.00 3.00 3N E 4 ♦3 4-Chernis-Sherman vs 2-Hargest-Hargest
|
17 |
♠T832
♥KQ
♦T32
♣KQT4
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 2♦ 1♥ 3♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣6 ♦5 ♥5 ♠4/3 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 2.50 0.50 2♠ N 3 ♥5 4-Chernis-Sherman vs 2-Hargest-Hargest
140 2.50 0.50 1♠ N 3 ♥9 2-Urben-Baronofsky vs 4-Burchfield-Burchfield
110 1.00 2.00 2♠ N 2 ♥9 3-Curwin-Benaderet vs 1-Knode-Sacks
80 0.00 3.00 1♠ S 1 ♦5 1-Rothman-Olgin vs 3-Poncher-Hendrix
|
18 |
♠Q85
♥3
♦KT982
♣K864
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 1♠ ♣3 ♥2 NT3 |
EW: 3♣ 5♥ 4NT ♦5 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
450 1.50 1.50 4♥ W 5 ♦T 2-Urben-Baronofsky vs 4-Burchfield-Burchfield
450 1.50 1.50 4♥ E 5 ♠J 3-Curwin-Benaderet vs 1-Knode-Sacks
450 1.50 1.50 4♥ E 5 ♠J 4-Chernis-Sherman vs 2-Hargest-Hargest
450 1.50 1.50 4♥ E 5 ♣Q 1-Rothman-Olgin vs 3-Poncher-Hendrix
|
19 |
♠T984
♥9762
♦92
♣QT5
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 2♦ 3♥ ♠5 NT6 |
EW: 1♠ ♣5/4 ♦5/4 ♥4/3 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
500 3.00 0.00 4♠* W -2 ♦9 3-Curwin-Benaderet vs 1-Knode-Sacks
200 2.00 1.00 3♠ W -2 ♦9 4-Chernis-Sherman vs 2-Hargest-Hargest
100 1.00 2.00 3♠ W -1 ♦9 1-Rothman-Olgin vs 3-Poncher-Hendrix
50 0.00 3.00 4♥ N -1 ♦5 2-Urben-Baronofsky vs 4-Burchfield-Burchfield
|
20 |
♠KJ853
♥T94
♦KQ52
♣8
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 2♠ ♣5 ♥5 NT5 |
EW: 2♣ 2NT ♦5/6 ♥6 ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
PASS 2.00 1.00 Pass Out 2-Urben-Baronofsky vs 4-Burchfield-Burchfield
PASS 2.00 1.00 Pass Out 3-Curwin-Benaderet vs 1-Knode-Sacks
PASS 2.00 1.00 Pass Out 4-Chernis-Sherman vs 2-Hargest-Hargest
120 0.00 3.00 2N E 2 ♣3 1-Rothman-Olgin vs 3-Poncher-Hendrix
|
21 |
♠A9643
♥QT7
♦AT9
♣32
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♠ ♣5 ♦4 ♥6 NT5 |
EW: 2♣ 3♦ 1♥ 1NT ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.00 0.00 3N W -2 ♠4 1-Rothman-Olgin vs 3-Poncher-Hendrix
150 1.50 1.50 2N W 3 ♠4 4-Chernis-Sherman vs 2-Hargest-Hargest
150 1.50 1.50 1N E 3 ♥6 3-Curwin-Benaderet vs 1-Knode-Sacks
430 0.00 3.00 3N W 4 ♠4 2-Urben-Baronofsky vs 4-Burchfield-Burchfield
|
22 |
♠J5
♥AKQT642
♦82
♣A6
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 4♦ 5♥ ♠4 NT6 |
EW: 3♠ ♣3 ♦1 ♥1 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
480 2.50 0.50 4♥ N 6 ♠A 2-Urben-Baronofsky vs 3-Poncher-Hendrix
480 2.50 0.50 4♥ N 6 ♠A 4-Chernis-Sherman vs 1-Knode-Sacks
450 0.50 2.50 4♥ N 5 ♠A 1-Rothman-Olgin vs 2-Hargest-Hargest
450 0.50 2.50 4♥ N 5 ♦6 3-Curwin-Benaderet vs 4-Burchfield-Burchfield
|
23 |
♠KQT965
♥A
♦A3
♣KQ76
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 1♦ 3♠ 2NT ♥6 |
EW: 1♥ ♣3 ♦5/6 ♠3/4 NT4/5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 3.00 0.00 3♠ N 3 ♥4 2-Urben-Baronofsky vs 3-Poncher-Hendrix
100 1.00 2.00 4♠ N -1 ♥4 4-Chernis-Sherman vs 1-Knode-Sacks
100 1.00 2.00 3♠ N -1 ♦9 1-Rothman-Olgin vs 2-Hargest-Hargest
100 1.00 2.00 3♠ N -1 ♦9 3-Curwin-Benaderet vs 4-Burchfield-Burchfield
|
24 |
♠AJ754
♥A7
♦KJ5
♣J73
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♦ 2♠ 2NT ♣5 ♥4 |
EW: 2♥ ♣6 ♦2 ♠4 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 3.00 0.00 3♦ S 6 ♥K 3-Curwin-Benaderet vs 4-Burchfield-Burchfield
150 2.00 1.00 4♦ S 5 ♥K 2-Urben-Baronofsky vs 3-Poncher-Hendrix
170 0.50 2.50 3♥ W 4 ♦K 4-Chernis-Sherman vs 1-Knode-Sacks
170 0.50 2.50 2♥ W 4 ♣3 1-Rothman-Olgin vs 2-Hargest-Hargest
|
25 |
♠KQJ9
♥QT4
♦Q3
♣QT63
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 3♦ 1♠ ♥5 NT5 |
EW: 2♥ 2NT ♣5 ♦4 ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 3.00 0.00 3♥ E -2 ♠T 2-Urben-Baronofsky vs 3-Poncher-Hendrix
110 2.00 1.00 2♠ N 2 ♥A 4-Chernis-Sherman vs 1-Knode-Sacks
100 0.50 2.50 3♥ E -1 ♣K 1-Rothman-Olgin vs 2-Hargest-Hargest
100 0.50 2.50 2♥ E -1 ♣8 3-Curwin-Benaderet vs 4-Burchfield-Burchfield
|
26 |
♠A52
♥AJT42
♦A92
♣J2
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ ♣5 ♥5 ♠5 NT6 |
EW: 1♣ 2♥ 2♠ 1NT ♦5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
90 3.00 0.00 1N E 1 ♦7 4-Chernis-Sherman vs 1-Knode-Sacks
110 2.00 1.00 2♥ W 2 ♣J 3-Curwin-Benaderet vs 4-Burchfield-Burchfield
120 1.00 2.00 1N E 2 ♥3 1-Rothman-Olgin vs 2-Hargest-Hargest
200 0.00 3.00 2♦ S -2 ♠3 2-Urben-Baronofsky vs 3-Poncher-Hendrix
|
27 |
♠Q
♥AT96432
♦KQ7
♣76
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ 3/4♥ 1♠ 1/2NT ♣6 |
EW: 1♣ ♦4 ♥3 ♠5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
400 3.00 0.00 3N S 3 ♦5 3-Curwin-Benaderet vs 4-Burchfield-Burchfield
170 2.00 1.00 3♥ N 4 ♦T 2-Urben-Baronofsky vs 3-Poncher-Hendrix
140 1.00 2.00 3♥ N 3 ♦T 1-Rothman-Olgin vs 2-Hargest-Hargest
100 0.00 3.00 3N S -2 ♦5 4-Chernis-Sherman vs 1-Knode-Sacks
|
28 |
♠QT7
♥3
♦AKT876
♣A63
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 6♦ 6♠ 6NT ♣6 ♥6 |
EW: 1♣ 1♥ ♦0 ♠0 NT0 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
650 2.00 1.00 4♠ S 5 ♥2 1-Rothman-Olgin vs 2-Hargest-Hargest
650 2.00 1.00 4♠ S 5 ♣K 2-Urben-Baronofsky vs 3-Poncher-Hendrix
650 2.00 1.00 4♠ S 5 ♣K 3-Curwin-Benaderet vs 4-Burchfield-Burchfield
140 0.00 3.00 3♠ S 3 ♣K 4-Chernis-Sherman vs 1-Knode-Sacks
|