1 |
♠AQT95
♥QT3
♦Q6
♣A87
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 6/5♣ 3/2♦ 3♥ 6/5♠ 6/5NT |
EW: ♣1 ♦3 ♥4 ♠1 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
460 5.00 0.00 3N S 5 ♣T 5-Diamond-Falbo vs 3-Marsh-Gaer
450 3.50 1.50 4♠ N 5 ♥6 2-Chard-Trees vs 2-Zack-Bender
450 3.50 1.50 4♠ N 5 ♦T 3-Certa-Jones vs 4-Markowitz-Raine
400 2.00 3.00 3N S 3 ♥8 6-Spencer-Bendheim vs 5-Berry-Bullard
50 0.50 4.50 4♠ N -1 ♥6 1-Shapiro-Tucker vs 1-Zinn-Rehfeldt
50 0.50 4.50 4♠ N -1 ♦7 4-Yee-Comstock vs 6-Hall-Salem
|
2 |
♠82
♥Q84
♦T8653
♣J93
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4 ♦5 ♥2/1 ♠2 NT2 |
EW: 3♣ 2♦ 5♥ 5♠ 5NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 5.00 0.00 4♥ E 4 ♦K 6-Spencer-Bendheim vs 5-Berry-Bullard
450 3.50 1.50 4♥ E 5 ♥7 5-Diamond-Falbo vs 3-Marsh-Gaer
450 3.50 1.50 4♥ E 5 ♦K 1-Shapiro-Tucker vs 1-Zinn-Rehfeldt
480 1.00 4.00 4♥ E 6 ♦K 2-Chard-Trees vs 2-Zack-Bender
480 1.00 4.00 4♥ E 6 ♦K 3-Certa-Jones vs 4-Markowitz-Raine
480 1.00 4.00 4♥ E 6 ♦K 4-Yee-Comstock vs 6-Hall-Salem
|
3 |
♠4
♥AKQ9763
♦QT6
♣QJ
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 3♦ 6♥ 2♠ 5/6NT |
EW: ♣6 ♦4 ♥1 ♠4 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
980 5.00 0.00 6♥ S 6 ♦A 3-Certa-Jones vs 4-Markowitz-Raine
480 3.50 1.50 4♥ N 6 ♠T 5-Diamond-Falbo vs 3-Marsh-Gaer
480 3.50 1.50 4♥ N 6 ♣2 2-Chard-Trees vs 2-Zack-Bender
450 2.00 3.00 4♥ N 5 ♦4 6-Spencer-Bendheim vs 5-Berry-Bullard
420 1.00 4.00 4♥ N 4 ♦2 1-Shapiro-Tucker vs 1-Zinn-Rehfeldt
200 0.00 5.00 2♥ N 5 ♠5 4-Yee-Comstock vs 6-Hall-Salem
|
4 |
♠JT9875
♥KQ
♦K8
♣J85
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 1♠ ♣5 ♥5 NT5 |
EW: 2♣ 2♥ 2NT ♦5 ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 5.00 0.00 2♠ N 3 ♦A 2-Chard-Trees vs 2-Zack-Bender
110 4.00 1.00 2♦ S 3 ♠A 5-Diamond-Falbo vs 3-Marsh-Gaer
100 2.00 3.00 3♥ W -1 ♠J 1-Shapiro-Tucker vs 1-Zinn-Rehfeldt
100 2.00 3.00 3♥ W -1 ♦K 3-Certa-Jones vs 4-Markowitz-Raine
100 2.00 3.00 3♥ W -1 ♦K 6-Spencer-Bendheim vs 5-Berry-Bullard
100 0.00 5.00 2♠ N -1 ♣2 4-Yee-Comstock vs 6-Hall-Salem
|
5 |
♠87
♥T9
♦AKQ98
♣T642
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6 ♦6 ♥5 ♠5 NT6 |
EW: 1♦ 2♥ 2♠ 1NT ♣6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 5.00 0.00 1N E -1 ♦T 2-Chard-Trees vs 1-Zinn-Rehfeldt
80 4.00 1.00 1♠ W 1 ♦A 3-Certa-Jones vs 3-Marsh-Gaer
90 3.00 2.00 1N E 1 ♦T 5-Diamond-Falbo vs 2-Zack-Bender
110 1.50 3.50 1♠ W 2 ♦A 1-Shapiro-Tucker vs 6-Hall-Salem
110 1.50 3.50 2♥ E 2 ♦T 4-Yee-Comstock vs 5-Berry-Bullard
120 0.00 5.00 1N E 2 ♦T 6-Spencer-Bendheim vs 4-Markowitz-Raine
|
6 |
♠Q98
♥KT85
♦KJ54
♣KQ
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 2♥ 1♠ 1NT ♣6 |
EW: 1♣ ♦5/6 ♥4 ♠6 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 5.00 0.00 2♠ W -2 ♥5 6-Spencer-Bendheim vs 4-Markowitz-Raine
110 3.50 1.50 2♥ S 2 ♦A 3-Certa-Jones vs 3-Marsh-Gaer
110 3.50 1.50 2♥ S 2 ♣6 4-Yee-Comstock vs 5-Berry-Bullard
100 2.00 3.00 3♥ S -2 ♠J 5-Diamond-Falbo vs 2-Zack-Bender
110 1.00 4.00 2♠ W 2 ♣K 1-Shapiro-Tucker vs 6-Hall-Salem
140 0.00 5.00 2♠ W 3 ♣K 2-Chard-Trees vs 1-Zinn-Rehfeldt
|
7 |
♠AJ9
♥Q7
♦KT93
♣KQT7
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♦ 1♥ 2♠ 3NT ♣6 |
EW: -/1♣ ♣6/7 ♦3 ♥6 ♠4 NT3/4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
630 5.00 0.00 3N N 4 ♣6 4-Yee-Comstock vs 5-Berry-Bullard
150 3.00 2.00 2N N 3 ♣6 3-Certa-Jones vs 3-Marsh-Gaer
150 3.00 2.00 2N N 3 ♣2 2-Chard-Trees vs 1-Zinn-Rehfeldt
150 3.00 2.00 1N N 3 ♥3 6-Spencer-Bendheim vs 4-Markowitz-Raine
100 1.00 4.00 2♠ N -1 ♦5 1-Shapiro-Tucker vs 6-Hall-Salem
300 0.00 5.00 4♠ N -3 ♦5 5-Diamond-Falbo vs 2-Zack-Bender
|
8 |
♠AT73
♥T4
♦AJ8
♣AKJ4
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 3♦ 2♥ 3♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣5 ♦4 ♥4/5 ♠3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
500 5.00 0.00 2♥* E -3 ♠Q 3-Certa-Jones vs 3-Marsh-Gaer
150 3.50 1.50 3♥ E -3 ♠Q 5-Diamond-Falbo vs 2-Zack-Bender
150 3.50 1.50 2♥ E -3 ♠Q 6-Spencer-Bendheim vs 4-Markowitz-Raine
120 1.00 4.00 1N N 2 ♥A 1-Shapiro-Tucker vs 6-Hall-Salem
120 1.00 4.00 1N N 2 ♥A 2-Chard-Trees vs 1-Zinn-Rehfeldt
120 1.00 4.00 1N N 2 ♥A 4-Yee-Comstock vs 5-Berry-Bullard
|
9 |
♠AJ875
♥43
♦96
♣AQT3
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2/3♣ 1♦ 4♥ 3♠ 2/3NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦6 ♥3 ♠4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
400 5.00 0.00 3N W -4 ♥8 6-Spencer-Bendheim vs 3-Marsh-Gaer
140 3.00 2.00 3♠ N 3 ♦3 3-Certa-Jones vs 2-Zack-Bender
140 3.00 2.00 2♠ N 3 ♦5 4-Yee-Comstock vs 4-Markowitz-Raine
140 3.00 2.00 2♥ S 3 ♦2 1-Shapiro-Tucker vs 5-Berry-Bullard
110 1.00 4.00 2♥ S 2 ♦8 2-Chard-Trees vs 6-Hall-Salem
50 0.00 5.00 2♠ N -1 ♦5 5-Diamond-Falbo vs 1-Zinn-Rehfeldt
|
10 |
♠853
♥K
♦Q95
♣KQ9653
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 3♦ ♥5 ♠5 NT6 |
EW: 1♥ 2♠ 1NT ♣4 ♦4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 5.00 0.00 3♥ W -2 ♦6 2-Chard-Trees vs 6-Hall-Salem
150 4.00 1.00 3♦ S 5 ♥A 1-Shapiro-Tucker vs 5-Berry-Bullard
130 3.00 2.00 3♣ N 4 ♥3 3-Certa-Jones vs 2-Zack-Bender
110 1.50 3.50 3♦ S 3 ♠2 4-Yee-Comstock vs 4-Markowitz-Raine
110 1.50 3.50 3♣ N 3 ♥8 6-Spencer-Bendheim vs 3-Marsh-Gaer
170 0.00 5.00 2♥ W 4 ♦5 5-Diamond-Falbo vs 1-Zinn-Rehfeldt
|
11 |
♠9
♥KJT982
♦KQ94
♣J6
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 3♦ 4♥ 4♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣2 ♦4 ♥3 ♠3 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 4.50 0.50 4♠ S 4 ♣6 2-Chard-Trees vs 6-Hall-Salem
420 4.50 0.50 4♠ S 4 ♣3 4-Yee-Comstock vs 4-Markowitz-Raine
170 3.00 2.00 3♠ S 4 ♦A 5-Diamond-Falbo vs 1-Zinn-Rehfeldt
50 1.00 4.00 4♠ S -1 ♥3 3-Certa-Jones vs 2-Zack-Bender
50 1.00 4.00 4♠ S -1 ♦A 1-Shapiro-Tucker vs 5-Berry-Bullard
50 1.00 4.00 4♠ S -1 ♦A 6-Spencer-Bendheim vs 3-Marsh-Gaer
|
12 |
♠J6
♥Q9652
♦A5
♣AQ98
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ ♣5 ♥5 ♠4 NT4 |
EW: 2♣ -/2♥ 2/3♠ 2/3NT ♦5 ♥5/8 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 5.00 0.00 3♠ W 3 ♦A 5-Diamond-Falbo vs 1-Zinn-Rehfeldt
150 2.50 2.50 2N W 3 ♥7 2-Chard-Trees vs 6-Hall-Salem
150 2.50 2.50 2N W 3 ♥6 6-Spencer-Bendheim vs 3-Marsh-Gaer
150 2.50 2.50 2N W 3 ♥5 1-Shapiro-Tucker vs 5-Berry-Bullard
150 2.50 2.50 2N W 3 ♥3 3-Certa-Jones vs 2-Zack-Bender
400 0.00 5.00 3N W 3 ♣8 4-Yee-Comstock vs 4-Markowitz-Raine
|
13 |
♠AJ95
♥K8653
♦QJT
♣8
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 6♦ 4♥ 4♠ 6NT |
EW: ♣2 ♦1 ♥3 ♠2 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
690 5.00 0.00 3N S 6 ♥A 3-Certa-Jones vs 1-Zinn-Rehfeldt
660 3.50 1.50 3N N 5 ♠3 4-Yee-Comstock vs 3-Marsh-Gaer
660 3.50 1.50 3N N 5 ♣3 6-Spencer-Bendheim vs 2-Zack-Bender
620 1.50 3.50 5♦ S 6 ♣J 1-Shapiro-Tucker vs 4-Markowitz-Raine
620 1.50 3.50 5♦ S 6 ♣J 2-Chard-Trees vs 5-Berry-Bullard
190 0.00 5.00 3♦ S 7 ♣J 5-Diamond-Falbo vs 6-Hall-Salem
|
14 |
♠KQT9
♥QT
♦QT83
♣KT6
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 4♦ 1NT ♥4 ♠5 |
EW: 2♥ 2♠ ♣4/5 ♦3 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
130 4.50 0.50 4♦ S 4 ♥A 3-Certa-Jones vs 1-Zinn-Rehfeldt
130 4.50 0.50 4♦ S 4 ♥A 4-Yee-Comstock vs 3-Marsh-Gaer
110 2.50 2.50 3♦ S 3 ♥A 1-Shapiro-Tucker vs 4-Markowitz-Raine
110 2.50 2.50 3♦ S 3 ♥A 2-Chard-Trees vs 5-Berry-Bullard
50 1.00 4.00 4♥ E -1 ♠6 5-Diamond-Falbo vs 6-Hall-Salem
100 0.00 5.00 3N N -2 ♥8 6-Spencer-Bendheim vs 2-Zack-Bender
|
15 |
♠765
♥Q52
♦J6
♣AT963
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 1♦ 1♥ 3♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦6 ♥6 ♠4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
180 5.00 0.00 1N S 4 ♥4 3-Certa-Jones vs 1-Zinn-Rehfeldt
120 2.50 2.50 1N S 2 ♥6 2-Chard-Trees vs 5-Berry-Bullard
120 2.50 2.50 1N S 2 ♥6 6-Spencer-Bendheim vs 2-Zack-Bender
120 2.50 2.50 1N S 2 ♥4 1-Shapiro-Tucker vs 4-Markowitz-Raine
120 2.50 2.50 1N S 2 ♥4 5-Diamond-Falbo vs 6-Hall-Salem
110 0.00 5.00 2♥ W 2 ♦J 4-Yee-Comstock vs 3-Marsh-Gaer
|
16 |
♠KT4
♥KT
♦Q5
♣AKQJ87
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 6♣ 1♦ 5♥ 4♠ 5NT |
EW: ♣1 ♦4 ♥2 ♠2 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
460 4.00 1.00 3N N 5 ♠2 6-Spencer-Bendheim vs 2-Zack-Bender
460 4.00 1.00 3N N 5 ♦6 2-Chard-Trees vs 5-Berry-Bullard
460 4.00 1.00 3N N 5 ♦4 4-Yee-Comstock vs 3-Marsh-Gaer
450 2.00 3.00 4♥ S 5 ♦3 3-Certa-Jones vs 1-Zinn-Rehfeldt
400 1.00 4.00 5♣ N 5 ♦A 5-Diamond-Falbo vs 6-Hall-Salem
150 0.00 5.00 3♣ N 5 ♦A 1-Shapiro-Tucker vs 4-Markowitz-Raine
|
17 |
♠Q94
♥65
♦AJ3
♣QJ842
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 2♥ ♦6 ♠5 NT5 |
EW: 1♦ 2♠ ♣6 ♥5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 5.00 0.00 3♠* W -1 ♥6 6-Spencer-Bendheim vs 1-Zinn-Rehfeldt
50 4.00 1.00 3♥ W -1 ♥6 2-Chard-Trees vs 4-Markowitz-Raine
110 3.00 2.00 2♠ W 2 ♥6 3-Certa-Jones vs 6-Hall-Salem
140 1.50 3.50 3♠ W 3 ♥6 1-Shapiro-Tucker vs 3-Marsh-Gaer
140 1.50 3.50 3♠ W 3 ♥6 5-Diamond-Falbo vs 5-Berry-Bullard
150 0.00 5.00 2N N -3 ♠7 4-Yee-Comstock vs 2-Zack-Bender
|
18 |
♠8743
♥J8
♦AKT98
♣K9
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ -/1NT ♣5/6 ♥5 ♠5/6 NT6/7 |
EW: 1♣ 2♥ 1♠ ♦6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.50 0.50 3♥ W -2 ♦A 3-Certa-Jones vs 6-Hall-Salem
100 4.50 0.50 2♥ W -2 ♦A 5-Diamond-Falbo vs 5-Berry-Bullard
50 3.00 2.00 2♥ W -1 ♦A 6-Spencer-Bendheim vs 1-Zinn-Rehfeldt
80 2.00 3.00 1♠ W 1 ♦A 4-Yee-Comstock vs 2-Zack-Bender
110 0.50 4.50 1♠ W 2 ♦A 2-Chard-Trees vs 4-Markowitz-Raine
110 0.50 4.50 2♥ W 2 ♦A 1-Shapiro-Tucker vs 3-Marsh-Gaer
|
19 |
♠QT4
♥865
♦KJ432
♣K4
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 2/3♦ 2♥ 2/3♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣5 ♦4 ♥5 ♠4 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
430 3.00 2.00 3N S 4 ♥T 1-Shapiro-Tucker vs 3-Marsh-Gaer
430 3.00 2.00 3N S 4 ♥T 4-Yee-Comstock vs 2-Zack-Bender
430 3.00 2.00 3N S 4 ♥7 3-Certa-Jones vs 6-Hall-Salem
430 3.00 2.00 3N S 4 ♥7 5-Diamond-Falbo vs 5-Berry-Bullard
430 3.00 2.00 3N N 4 ♦7 2-Chard-Trees vs 4-Markowitz-Raine
400 0.00 5.00 3N N 3 ♣8 6-Spencer-Bendheim vs 1-Zinn-Rehfeldt
|
20 |
♠T
♥AT6
♦AK73
♣AK864
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 6♣ 4♦ 4NT ♥6 ♠6 |
EW: ♣1 ♦3 ♥6 ♠6 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
630 5.00 0.00 3N S 4 ♠A 2-Chard-Trees vs 4-Markowitz-Raine
200 4.00 1.00 2♠* W -1 ♠T 6-Spencer-Bendheim vs 1-Zinn-Rehfeldt
150 3.00 2.00 4♣ S 5 ♥K 3-Certa-Jones vs 6-Hall-Salem
130 2.00 3.00 4♣ S 4 ♥K 4-Yee-Comstock vs 2-Zack-Bender
100 0.50 4.50 5♣ S -1 ♠4 5-Diamond-Falbo vs 5-Berry-Bullard
100 0.50 4.50 5♣ S -1 ♥5 1-Shapiro-Tucker vs 3-Marsh-Gaer
|
21 |
♠J5
♥QJ8
♦KJ
♣A76432
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 3♠ ♦5 ♥6 NT6 |
EW: 2♦ ♣6 ♥6 ♠3 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 4.00 1.00 3♠ S 3 ♥6 2-Chard-Trees vs 3-Marsh-Gaer
140 4.00 1.00 2♠ S 3 ♥5 3-Certa-Jones vs 5-Berry-Bullard
140 4.00 1.00 2♠ S 3 ♥5 5-Diamond-Falbo vs 4-Markowitz-Raine
100 2.00 3.00 3N E -2 ♣T 1-Shapiro-Tucker vs 2-Zack-Bender
100 0.50 4.50 3♠ S -1 ♥5 4-Yee-Comstock vs 1-Zinn-Rehfeldt
100 0.50 4.50 2♠ S -1 ♥8 6-Spencer-Bendheim vs 6-Hall-Salem
|
22 |
♠A8
♥Q754
♦9732
♣763
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 6♣ ♦2 ♥2 ♠4 NT4 |
EW: 4♦ 5♥ 2♠ ♣1 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
1090 4.50 0.50 6♣* S 6 ♥K 1-Shapiro-Tucker vs 2-Zack-Bender
1090 4.50 0.50 6♣* S 6 ♥2 6-Spencer-Bendheim vs 6-Hall-Salem
710 3.00 2.00 4♣* S 6 ♥2 4-Yee-Comstock vs 1-Zinn-Rehfeldt
420 1.00 4.00 5♣ S 6 ♥6 2-Chard-Trees vs 3-Marsh-Gaer
420 1.00 4.00 5♣ S 6 ♥2 3-Certa-Jones vs 5-Berry-Bullard
420 1.00 4.00 5♣ S 6 ♥2 5-Diamond-Falbo vs 4-Markowitz-Raine
|
23 |
♠QT6
♥JT2
♦KQ754
♣KQ
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 2♥ 2♠ 1NT ♣5 |
EW: 1♣ ♦5 ♥3 ♠4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
620 4.50 0.50 4♥ S 4 ♥9 2-Chard-Trees vs 3-Marsh-Gaer
620 4.50 0.50 4♥ S 4 ♣A 3-Certa-Jones vs 5-Berry-Bullard
100 2.50 2.50 4♥ S -1 ♠9 1-Shapiro-Tucker vs 2-Zack-Bender
100 2.50 2.50 4♥ S -1 ♠8 6-Spencer-Bendheim vs 6-Hall-Salem
200 0.50 4.50 4♥ S -2 ♠9 4-Yee-Comstock vs 1-Zinn-Rehfeldt
200 0.50 4.50 4♥ S -2 ♠9 5-Diamond-Falbo vs 4-Markowitz-Raine
|
24 |
♠QJ853
♥AT7
♦5
♣J854
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 2♦ 1♥ 4♠ 2NT |
EW: ♣5 ♦5 ♥5 ♠3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
400 4.50 0.50 3N S 3 ♦2 1-Shapiro-Tucker vs 2-Zack-Bender
400 4.50 0.50 3N N 3 ♥2 4-Yee-Comstock vs 1-Zinn-Rehfeldt
50 2.50 2.50 4♠ S -1 ♦J 3-Certa-Jones vs 5-Berry-Bullard
50 2.50 2.50 4♠ N -1 ♥K 6-Spencer-Bendheim vs 6-Hall-Salem
100 0.50 4.50 3N S -2 ♦J 5-Diamond-Falbo vs 4-Markowitz-Raine
100 0.50 4.50 4♠ S -2 ♦J 2-Chard-Trees vs 3-Marsh-Gaer
|